have you noticed any "real" performance hit since you've installed these in RAID0? Since TRIM is not supported in RAID of any kind, just wondering if you noticed your drives slowing down at all.
Dat islekker snel.Ik heb sinds een week een Kingston SSD 128GB in mijn ASUS N73JQ,laptop.windows start op in 15 sec,met software erbij 19 sec.Voorheen met de originele schijf 50 sec,de vooruitgang is enorm,ook met zappen,downloaden en aplicaties openen,alles gaat veel sneller.Eigenlijk zou nu al standaard in elke computer een SSD geinstalleerdt moeten zijn.
@gr2k Yeah my ASUS N73JQ also on a Kingston 128GB SSD in just 18 sec.I paid second hands only 120 euros for the ssd.My notebook boots up now twice as fast.Before it was 45 sec with the original Seagate 500GB 5400 RPM drive.
@mansen2525 impossible you cant make the win 7 boot screen go faster than those red, blue, yellow, and green things meet in the center of the screen it is impossible to boot in 15 seconds
LOL, I have a laptop with only 1 SSD (80 Gig) and it boots up 7 just as quickly... the person who made this video needs to optimize their Windows 7 PC and it should boot up even faster.
In HD-Tune Pro, go to the tab 'random access' and perform that test. Check how many IOPS you get at the different sized blocks. (read and write). Check out the new link for a screenshot in the video. This is basically every day use performance, the other tests are more synthethic.
@TheIrredeemable It really depends on which X-25 you have. If you have the X25-E, which the E stands for extreme, then You'll have to reevaluate what you just said. The X25-E has 250MB/s of sequential write, so if you put both of them in RAID 0, your single Vertex 2 might not have enough power to rival them. IMHO.
If you are willing to spend nearly four hundred on a single low gig extreme series that is.....Espeacially when you could purchase and RAID two vertex 2s and out perform the E for that price.
Raid doesn't speed up booting in case of ssd. The response time of 0,1ms does not get any better, only worse. So this is a bad example to show off speed.
@UticaCC12 read speeds arent that interesting because in real life there are rarely files on the disk that are in the following sectors. Realistic benchmarks show Random Read and Write speeds, like in the links in the videodescription. look at where ocz is in those benchmarks. looks to me you fall for their marketing.
the X-25M's arnt even they fast SDD's any more they have 250mb/s read when the OCZ Agility 2's have an amazing 285mb/s read. and their the same price for the intel 80gb and the OCZ 90gb. OCZ FTW!
Maybe in booting because raid1 takes a little more time initializing (post) and improves large file transfer rather than opening small files (which happends alot at booting windows). A harddisk is in general not faster in extracting winrar files, starting programs, video editting, searching files/programs etc. Take my word for it that everything inside Windows is dominated by SSD. If you want we can both make videos of doing certain tasks and find out.
@HansensUniverse what is your HDD, need specs too. like mb/s write and read. if you dont know the mb/s theres abunch of free software that can tell you.
I'm not sure if I should switch to SSDs because of the amount of data I write to them; due to the limited amount of times that the cells can be written to, the SSDs can literally get eaten away with use.
the clock starts running when you hit the power button and stops when you open a window, it doesn't stop when the desktop is shown because win 7 is still booting
I'll say the same thing here that i did on the other RAIDed SSD video.
ONE OCZ vertex with TRIM enabled is just as fast, or faster than this. Raiding SSDs with a built in RAID controller gets your very little help with booting. Maybe with copying HUGE files, but otherwise, there's nothing noticable because A: Mobo RAID controllers suck and B: You lose TRIM which means that it's going to increase the latency. More than two fold. More like ten fold.
It doesn't matter that the mobo raid-controller sucks. Raid0 has a very simple algorithm, especially with only 2 drives. It starts to suffer with 3+ drives. I know because people on forums tested this compared to a decent raid-card. Ocz is not as fast, even not with TRIM:
-PCmark
-IOMeter
Especially IOMeter proves why Intel's SSD controller has no rival. Nothing beats it. And the latency story is not true, It's still 0.1ms according to HDTach and other benchmarks. Like I said, raid0 algorithm.
So, correct me if i'm wrong, but that means that you DID double that latency of the drives. When you RAID, you should be able to effectively half the latency. Like this, it didn't do much. I just can't reallu justify spending the money on two SSDs to get the latency of one. If they had some sort of way to run TRIM in RAID, i'd do it in a heart beat.
@keldererik Ah, i see. I suppose that works... i'm just not big of RAID. Every time i've tried it it's blown up in a few months or dragged down so bad that it was useless.
@DragonTamer2345 If you RAID 2x intel SSDs you wont notice any improvements. However, there will be improvements for 512K reads and writes, that means you will be able to copy movies faster. the 4K reads and writes will not double, in some cases with other SSDs, 4K performance can even decrease.
Putting SSD's in raid-0 is idiotic. You lose the built in TRIM function with these X-25-M and you double the latency. (The main reason people get SSD's is their micro second latencys). Latency is more important then read/write speed.
If you did not lose the TRIM function when you raid SSD's it would be great, but its a waste of money since you do. Since you double the latency the boot time is almost unaffected by the faster read/write speed.
Prove it with a benchmark. I've already proven you wrong by running a single SSD and RAID0. Both videos can be found in my profile. I'm not a troll, people that watch this and get jelous or what not have the need to post stupid comments, like yourself. Do you really think I should answer every dumb comment i get on youtube? Like now, fucktard.
ssd's can't crash. Eventually they won't be able to write data, but still able to read the cells. So copy all the data is no problem. They have longer life than normal hdd's these days. Thanks for trying to be smart, and good luck with being dumb.
@arni291 I was going to say, my 5k rpm hdd load in jjust a few seconds slower. Those new corsair force seires ssd's are pretty fast. I'd like to see a startup with those.
This has been flagged as spam show
I do the same time with just my 2TB HDD...
But when I have no application installed...
bigemul 1 week ago
Comment removed
bigemul 1 week ago
A macbook pro does that boot time in 2 1 tb hard drive RAID 0.
harborskoolmaniac 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi would 2 x 60 raid 0 ssd would have better performance or getting 120 single ssd or does it matter?
PCIEXPRES2 3 months ago
have you noticed any "real" performance hit since you've installed these in RAID0? Since TRIM is not supported in RAID of any kind, just wondering if you noticed your drives slowing down at all.
seetherfan1328 6 months ago
WTF is this case?
yuri00r 6 months ago 2
@yuri00r Apparently it's made by uhaul.
HayLotion 1 month ago
from what I always heard, RAID 0 actually slows, SSDs. At least that was the case with early models.
Shaniirne 6 months ago
Dat islekker snel.Ik heb sinds een week een Kingston SSD 128GB in mijn ASUS N73JQ,laptop.windows start op in 15 sec,met software erbij 19 sec.Voorheen met de originele schijf 50 sec,de vooruitgang is enorm,ook met zappen,downloaden en aplicaties openen,alles gaat veel sneller.Eigenlijk zou nu al standaard in elke computer een SSD geinstalleerdt moeten zijn.
helthuismartin 6 months ago
odd thing is my single SSD drive boots just as fast ..
gr2k 7 months ago
@gr2k Yeah my ASUS N73JQ also on a Kingston 128GB SSD in just 18 sec.I paid second hands only 120 euros for the ssd.My notebook boots up now twice as fast.Before it was 45 sec with the original Seagate 500GB 5400 RPM drive.
helthuismartin 7 months ago
hiow long from standy?
iXW1X 7 months ago
when did win7 come out?
ravenousjerboa 8 months ago
wats the song name??
giutarmanjosh 8 months ago
Thank you, but my Pc faster than yours even if i have q9450@3.5, check out my video ^6^
kaenlaithai 10 months ago
5400 rpm drives should be banned!
XxHardcorexxGamerxX 11 months ago
Wow! Impressive... Just wish SSDs became a little more affordable...
XxHardcorexxGamerxX 11 months ago
haha, my ssd boot windows 7 in 15 or less
mansen2525 11 months ago
@mansen2525 impossible you cant make the win 7 boot screen go faster than those red, blue, yellow, and green things meet in the center of the screen it is impossible to boot in 15 seconds
blowupuate13 11 months ago
@blowupuate13 i clocked it at 14,7 sec
mansen2525 11 months ago
@mansen2525 check my channel, its a bit fail on the clock but it is faster than yours ;)
mansen2525 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@blowupuate13 check my channel, its a bit fail on the clock but it is faster than yours ;)
mansen2525 11 months ago
LOL, I have a laptop with only 1 SSD (80 Gig) and it boots up 7 just as quickly... the person who made this video needs to optimize their Windows 7 PC and it should boot up even faster.
RayTech70 1 year ago
@RayTech70 he has shit tons of programs on his ssd =.=
AphamX 1 year ago
Nice PSU, I have the same one, but the 1kw version.
l33tp1mp 1 year ago
@keldererik
Recently installed a OCZ Vertex 2 series 60gb SSD.
With a 295 R speed and 285 W speed 250 sustained it alone can easily rival X-25s in a RAID config.
It also supports TRIM and scores a blistering 7.7 index rating.
If you intend on updating anytime soon go for the latest Vertex 2 series with the SF controllers.
The 60 gig is on sale on NewEgg.
TheIrredeemable 1 year ago
@TheIrredeemable
How is the random read and random write speed?
keldererik 1 year ago
@keldererik
4K random writes.
Nothing too astounding, but still quite nice.
TheIrredeemable 1 year ago
@TheIrredeemable
4k random writes what?
In HD-Tune Pro, go to the tab 'random access' and perform that test. Check how many IOPS you get at the different sized blocks. (read and write). Check out the new link for a screenshot in the video. This is basically every day use performance, the other tests are more synthethic.
keldererik 1 year ago
@TheIrredeemable It really depends on which X-25 you have. If you have the X25-E, which the E stands for extreme, then You'll have to reevaluate what you just said. The X25-E has 250MB/s of sequential write, so if you put both of them in RAID 0, your single Vertex 2 might not have enough power to rival them. IMHO.
wwyk1993 11 months ago
@wwyk1993
If you are willing to spend nearly four hundred on a single low gig extreme series that is.....Espeacially when you could purchase and RAID two vertex 2s and out perform the E for that price.
Not to mention you would have more storage space.
TheIrredeemable 11 months ago
@TheIrredeemable The X25-E comes in both 32 and 64GB sizes.
wwyk1993 11 months ago
@wwyk1993
I am aware of this.
However, even the 32gig is nearly four hundred dollars.
You could purchase several Vertex 2 90GB at that price.
TheIrredeemable 11 months ago
@keldererik
Personally im not sure.
But as long as you use the RAID drives as a boot and update config (OS partition) only then you shouldnt need TRIM fo a while.
I use a Intel X-25 for a OS partition and a 32gig Corsair Nova V gaming series SSD for games.
Indeed 70 gigs is not alot of space, but its so easy to mantain and keep nice and speedy.
The TRIM feature and Win7 are a godsend to SSD users.
Also AHCI is not supported in RAID, which will increase the speed of a stand alone SSD.
TheIrredeemable 1 year ago
@summt5697
Raid doesn't speed up booting in case of ssd. The response time of 0,1ms does not get any better, only worse. So this is a bad example to show off speed.
keldererik 1 year ago
@keldererik why you do it then?
ijoshtech 1 year ago
@ijoshtech
For benchmarks and large files, like extracting movies or repairing them with par2 files. Very fast.
keldererik 1 year ago
how much it ?
clasesocial 1 year ago
i'm not very impressed.. : (
homokakksakka 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Start up the MSCONFIG application, and disable the startup GUI and splash screens, then you'll see a marked improvement in startup speed.
temporalparadox 1 year ago
Start up the MSCONFIG aplication, and disable the startup GUI and splash screens, then you'll see a marked improvement in startup speed.
temporalparadox 1 year ago
woah.. what case is that? it looks like 2 seprate cases infused together... is that for a server?
mlanonymous 1 year ago
@UticaCC12 read speeds arent that interesting because in real life there are rarely files on the disk that are in the following sectors. Realistic benchmarks show Random Read and Write speeds, like in the links in the videodescription. look at where ocz is in those benchmarks. looks to me you fall for their marketing.
keldererik 1 year ago
@UticaCC12
keldererik 1 year ago
no mean for hate tho nice setup :D
UticaCC12 1 year ago
the X-25M's arnt even they fast SDD's any more they have 250mb/s read when the OCZ Agility 2's have an amazing 285mb/s read. and their the same price for the intel 80gb and the OCZ 90gb. OCZ FTW!
UticaCC12 1 year ago
Do you have all cores activated on boot? it'll shave off ALLOT of time.
h4rukun 1 year ago
Music:
Artist - Kito
Track Title - Cold [Full Version]
Greetings from Estonia!
RamsesHarrysson 1 year ago
you should only stop the clock when the HDD indicator stops, not when you see the desktop.
Because windows will not be responsive to any clicks until it loads the startup daemons and applications on the bottom right corner of the taskbar.
hraqhraq 1 year ago
my name is Harry balls :-(
Schmidteren 1 year ago
double clicking?
johnsy32 1 year ago
Cool.. thinking of doing this... What is the motherboard? It has the RAID controller installed already on the mobo correct?
dalesalsa 1 year ago
De boot is eens heel veel sneller dan mijn tweaked Win7 op een losse SATA 500g Seagate 7200 RPM HDD ;) (26 secs hier)
Uiteraard laden de apps wel veel sneller ^^
MM3nn00 1 year ago
What's the song?
Dalem50005 1 year ago
whats the name of the dubstep song?
mikemartin1200 1 year ago
get rid of the windows logo during boot and it will be a lot quicker.
run -> msconfig and uncheck BootGUI
grillan79 1 year ago
Now that's how computers are SUPPOSED to work and perform. :)
DeathDude72 1 year ago
guess a ssd is worth it then eh? =>
ed0985587 1 year ago
DANG THAT'S FAST
gamemaster905 1 year ago
how come that my standard HDD is faster ?
HansensUniverse 1 year ago
@HansensUniverse
Maybe in booting because raid1 takes a little more time initializing (post) and improves large file transfer rather than opening small files (which happends alot at booting windows). A harddisk is in general not faster in extracting winrar files, starting programs, video editting, searching files/programs etc. Take my word for it that everything inside Windows is dominated by SSD. If you want we can both make videos of doing certain tasks and find out.
keldererik 1 year ago
@HansensUniverse my one kingston ssd is much faster than your raid 0, LOL
hashtege 1 year ago
@HansensUniverse doubt it
decimat777 1 year ago
@decimat777 i don't
HansensUniverse 1 year ago
@HansensUniverse what is your HDD, need specs too. like mb/s write and read. if you dont know the mb/s theres abunch of free software that can tell you.
decimat777 1 year ago
That's slow! My single Intel SSD X25M loads windows in just about 10 seconds.
wicked4u2c 1 year ago
@wicked4u2c
Yeye, and the fish I caught was thissssssss bbbiiiiiggggg.
Video or it didn't happen. When I check other peoples vid's its around 20 seconds. For now it's another bullshit story on youtube.
keldererik 1 year ago 5
@keldererik
Give your E-mail address and I will send you the video, no need to lie or "bullshit" it is what it is.
wicked4u2c 1 year ago
@keldererik Thank you for the video but I must ask, What is the song!
Thank you
lizardmannnn 1 year ago
@lizardmannnn
Can't find it. I'll sweep my harddisks later and see if I can find it.
keldererik 1 year ago
@lizardmannnn
/watch?v=AvG8_IxRZ3Q
past this after youtube dot com
it's from black sun empire podcast 5.
keldererik 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@keldererik Thank you, I will subscribe.
lizardmannnn 1 year ago
@wicked4u2c Wow grats man, your a hater, how does that make you feel?
DaFakaMatt 1 year ago
@DaFakaMatt No hating, E-mail the poster of the video numb nuts. I sent him my video. Send me your E-mail address and I will show you the video too.
wicked4u2c 1 year ago
@wicked4u2c You were just comparing your set up to his and how much better it was. It was hate.
DaFakaMatt 1 year ago
This video isn't entirely correct. You stopped your timer while the OS was still loading. ;)
neooneeightytwo 1 year ago
did it say windows is starten?
brett1234 1 year ago
what song is this, and awsome computer setup!
maticoff 1 year ago
you stopped it a few seconds early but still very fast hope mine boots as quickly as your does.
MJBDC07 1 year ago
I'm not sure if I should switch to SSDs because of the amount of data I write to them; due to the limited amount of times that the cells can be written to, the SSDs can literally get eaten away with use.
HoneycombAgent 1 year ago
i have to said raid0 and then install windows or is the same plz i have 2 seagte 500gb and it said that my hdd dont support! plz help
XVAGOSX1 1 year ago
so shnell is meiner auch mit ner sata festplatte ... lso beim boot
THExROBONATOR 1 year ago
nice song !!!
omk556 1 year ago
What's the songs name!?!?
Mahander 1 year ago 5
hey moron you need to clock the test properly
the clock starts running when you hit the power button and stops when you open a window, it doesn't stop when the desktop is shown because win 7 is still booting
godscuttingyoudown 1 year ago
is 2x 500gb run ass 7200Rpm make a dfferent of 1x 500gb???????
TheArea510 1 year ago
I'll say the same thing here that i did on the other RAIDed SSD video.
ONE OCZ vertex with TRIM enabled is just as fast, or faster than this. Raiding SSDs with a built in RAID controller gets your very little help with booting. Maybe with copying HUGE files, but otherwise, there's nothing noticable because A: Mobo RAID controllers suck and B: You lose TRIM which means that it's going to increase the latency. More than two fold. More like ten fold.
DragonTamer2345 1 year ago
It doesn't matter that the mobo raid-controller sucks. Raid0 has a very simple algorithm, especially with only 2 drives. It starts to suffer with 3+ drives. I know because people on forums tested this compared to a decent raid-card. Ocz is not as fast, even not with TRIM:
-PCmark
-IOMeter
Especially IOMeter proves why Intel's SSD controller has no rival. Nothing beats it. And the latency story is not true, It's still 0.1ms according to HDTach and other benchmarks. Like I said, raid0 algorithm.
keldererik 1 year ago
So, correct me if i'm wrong, but that means that you DID double that latency of the drives. When you RAID, you should be able to effectively half the latency. Like this, it didn't do much. I just can't reallu justify spending the money on two SSDs to get the latency of one. If they had some sort of way to run TRIM in RAID, i'd do it in a heart beat.
DragonTamer2345 1 year ago
I needed more space for my programs so it was either JBOD or RAID..
keldererik 1 year ago
@keldererik Ah, i see. I suppose that works... i'm just not big of RAID. Every time i've tried it it's blown up in a few months or dragged down so bad that it was useless.
DragonTamer2345 1 year ago
@DragonTamer2345 If you RAID 2x intel SSDs you wont notice any improvements. However, there will be improvements for 512K reads and writes, that means you will be able to copy movies faster. the 4K reads and writes will not double, in some cases with other SSDs, 4K performance can even decrease.
bigdima3 1 year ago
@DragonTamer2345 But you DO get more storage.
HHBones 1 year ago
very nice fast Photoshop startup :P
garion992 1 year ago
Putting SSD's in raid-0 is idiotic. You lose the built in TRIM function with these X-25-M and you double the latency. (The main reason people get SSD's is their micro second latencys). Latency is more important then read/write speed.
If you did not lose the TRIM function when you raid SSD's it would be great, but its a waste of money since you do. Since you double the latency the boot time is almost unaffected by the faster read/write speed.
razattack1337 1 year ago
OMG I DOUBLED THE LATENCY, NOW ITS 0,2ms :'(((((
keldererik 1 year ago
During boot windows runs hundreds of files, most are small 4K ones. So it almost doubles your total boot time.
razattack1337 1 year ago
I should have read your comments, cant believe this author is a troll himself.
Well pointless trying to have an educated discussion, i'm outta here.
razattack1337 1 year ago
Prove it with a benchmark. I've already proven you wrong by running a single SSD and RAID0. Both videos can be found in my profile. I'm not a troll, people that watch this and get jelous or what not have the need to post stupid comments, like yourself. Do you really think I should answer every dumb comment i get on youtube? Like now, fucktard.
keldererik 1 year ago
@keldererik lmao
stonecoldsteven 1 year ago 2
raid 0 will crash eventually good luck with that
greenhornet123 2 years ago
ssd's can't crash. Eventually they won't be able to write data, but still able to read the cells. So copy all the data is no problem. They have longer life than normal hdd's these days. Thanks for trying to be smart, and good luck with being dumb.
keldererik 2 years ago
damm fast , i when raid 0 last night but havent fix bios full yet . still having some slow finding harddrive and what not.
danbertilsson 2 years ago
i can't wait for the sata 6gb/s ssd's!!! or usb 3!!! or if i got the money prob get a pci-e
madzane94 2 years ago
Yea whats the track's name is great
wheelsdeal 2 years ago
check out 'blacksundnb' channel. It's from a podcast.
keldererik 2 years ago
i love the song
deletethegame 2 years ago
Tomshardware get's the same speed with one Intel SSD.
1234lasse1234 2 years ago
raid0 doesnt decrease boot time. Maybe 1 or 2 seconds so that could be true :)
keldererik 2 years ago
★★★★★
halo2pc 2 years ago 6
Why are you mixing RAMs? Also could you repeat this with the i7 OC'd to ~3.7 GHz? It looks like the CPU is your bottleneck :P
JarminKell 2 years ago 2
CPU usage with ssds in raid0 is 1%, tell me, how can this bottleneck the ssds? I mix RAM in pairs with the same speed and latency.
keldererik 2 years ago
Nederlander
KooolaNL 2 years ago 2
>:D
keldererik 2 years ago
*Throws up in a sick bag... way to fast for me.
EjectSkate 2 years ago 5
lol that was fast
Jih1H 2 years ago 4
wow that was sick oO
taht is fast
Fightbird2013 2 years ago 7
windows 7 is fast itself
arni291 2 years ago 12
yea but not this fast :D
rngew 2 years ago 2
@arni291 No
jeroeniskoning 1 year ago
@arni291 I was going to say, my 5k rpm hdd load in jjust a few seconds slower. Those new corsair force seires ssd's are pretty fast. I'd like to see a startup with those.
jcostello117 11 months ago