This guy Ritter isn't insulting "Americans" or "America", he's insulting politicians and policies that are in violation of our Constitution. How can that challenged? We know we're in Iraq illegally.
If Russia attacked the US pre-emptively because they thought we were going to strike on them, and then they entered and occupied our country, would that be illegal, too? Our troops aren't at fault. They're following the orders given them by their commander-in-chief.
Scott is one of a handfull of people in the US who keeps talking about the issues around the deceptions involving iraq & iran. The people who deceived the people must be held to ACCOUNT!
Yeah pneeuh he does seem pretty sure of himself, you should attack more specificly his points. Don't let him get away with this, speak the truth bro, we need help out there.
Don't let him get away with what? Speak what truth? This guy Ritter is speaking the truth? I hope by "truth" you don't mean Bush's talking points. That's not truth.
This "Support The Troops" crap is a term designed by Neo-Cons to trick people into consigning consent. Who doesn't want to "support the troops"? Everyone does. By "Support The Troops", the powers that be actually mean "Support The War Policy". The civilian politicians who pushed through the Iraq war initiative couldn't care less about the troops. Once they come home, after they've been mutilated, both physically and mentally, they're discarded by the institution. That's a sad fact.
pnmeeuh merely said "what an idiot" (refering to Mr. Ritter) I was being Ironic! I realize the usefulness of framing devices like "support the troops" which create a dislocation between what you corectly labeled "support the troops" and "support the war"...I just hope silly pnmeeuh didn't think i was on his side. I was just pointing to pnmeeuh's great depth in his analysis jeje.
wow he's really spelling it out :)
nelson3300 1 year ago
paul / venture/ ritter / schiff for president.... pick any combo and you win
majikninja07 2 years ago
This man nails it.
viragemasta 3 years ago 2
This guy Ritter isn't insulting "Americans" or "America", he's insulting politicians and policies that are in violation of our Constitution. How can that challenged? We know we're in Iraq illegally.
If Russia attacked the US pre-emptively because they thought we were going to strike on them, and then they entered and occupied our country, would that be illegal, too? Our troops aren't at fault. They're following the orders given them by their commander-in-chief.
shade1978x 3 years ago 2
Scott is one of a handfull of people in the US who keeps talking about the issues around the deceptions involving iraq & iran. The people who deceived the people must be held to ACCOUNT!
akhalif68 4 years ago 6
No Matter what Scott said is true or wrong, in the eyes of the ppls in the world, America invaded Iraq is undoubtedly true!!!
wormike 4 years ago 5
what an idiot
pnmeeuh 4 years ago
Yeah pneeuh he does seem pretty sure of himself, you should attack more specificly his points. Don't let him get away with this, speak the truth bro, we need help out there.
castano2001 3 years ago
Don't let him get away with what? Speak what truth? This guy Ritter is speaking the truth? I hope by "truth" you don't mean Bush's talking points. That's not truth.
shade1978x 3 years ago
This "Support The Troops" crap is a term designed by Neo-Cons to trick people into consigning consent. Who doesn't want to "support the troops"? Everyone does. By "Support The Troops", the powers that be actually mean "Support The War Policy". The civilian politicians who pushed through the Iraq war initiative couldn't care less about the troops. Once they come home, after they've been mutilated, both physically and mentally, they're discarded by the institution. That's a sad fact.
shade1978x 3 years ago
pnmeeuh merely said "what an idiot" (refering to Mr. Ritter) I was being Ironic! I realize the usefulness of framing devices like "support the troops" which create a dislocation between what you corectly labeled "support the troops" and "support the war"...I just hope silly pnmeeuh didn't think i was on his side. I was just pointing to pnmeeuh's great depth in his analysis jeje.
castano2001 3 years ago