Most videos here on Youtube sadly don't do a good job on debunking Liberals, but you, so far, are the best. I hope the rest of your videos are like this one. -Fellow conservative
Such a war, Obama made a comment about FOX so all the fundy arseholes like Doren bought all the nonsense about some so called war. FOX hyped the war to build up their ratings. Lil jerks like Doren should take a critical look at the right wing spin he churns out
HowTheWorldWorks, you wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.
If you cannot see the obvious bias in Fox News, andyou cannot see that Fox News has a great deal of influence (Power) over their viewers (idiots like yourself) then you have no choice but to attack LiberalViewer. Everyone has built in bias, but viewers of Fox and Hannity and Beck, listeners of Rush, and his ilk simply want to believe whatever they are told, regardless of the facts. Argue with that.
If you cared about facts, you wouldn't be listening to Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and the rest of them.
But, I'll bite...how about this for a fact.
Fox News is not news, it is purely biased spin. It is neither fair nor balanced. Dick Cheney is a war criminal who should be prosecuted and sent to prison for the rest of his life. How is that for a fact?
I am a more libertarian conservative. I'm not like a ACLU nut.
I believe in a strong national defense, I'm just against the current foreign policy of Bush and Obama. Marijuana abuse went up went they made it illegal like they did alcohol. Leave the drug laws to the states.
Cheney and Bush were a shameful smear on the conservatives like Jimmy Carter was on liberals. Meaning that both of them were progressives that thought the Constitution was nothing.
You attack LiberalViewer because he has a large number of views. So, you figure that attacking him will get you lots of of views. Oh, I know, I don't know what I'm talking about right? Okay..how about stating our own views, (If you have any of your own that weren't give to you by Fox News) spew out all your hate..and let's see ho big a following you get sport.
Everyone knows there is obvious bias in Fox News (in terms of commentary at least), but then what about bias in print news, or on MSNBC? Once you start to attack one network's bias, if you don't attack the other biases yourself, you become just as biased.
SHE blaintatly said not just foxs news u fucking idoit, but of coarse it is the biggest source of misinformation, but you are the on taking the words out of context. SHE never said just fox news.
LiberalViewer had resorted to such childish tactics for a long time because he because as a public defender such tactics are effective in court. He argues to distort as a tactic. Also he tries to confuse and bury with minutiae. Youtube is a perfect forum for him because there are many fans who need nothing more than a soundbite to satisfy them. The target is FOX NEWS and he is being paid very well to destroy them
But he already has sunk lower! If you think that only the people you disagree with get the facts twisted and cherry pick then you're proving that you are doing the same thing! Every human lies to himself. It takes intense discipline to overcome that. Discipline I don't claim to have! So YOU are distorting the facts! Neener neener neener!
You are beyond a moron..at least make some sense or make a decent argument. Liberalviewer just walks all over you with his logical sense and actual facts. You are just a redneck hate monger - typical stupid American who just hates to see an informed intelligent American making an impact!!! Get a brain
@Auggie56 correction, HTWW. sorry its easy to get such arrogant titles confused. Sure wish I knew How the World Works but i guess i will always be handicapped because I am a liberal. Oh well, you really got me on that one, good rebuttal!
Everyone else is arrogant on here. Dont see you attacking them. Why? You are a right wing nutjob to believe anything that comes out of this guys mouth. Leave me alone
I'm not the kind of person who attacks people, I'm the kind of person who sits backs, watches, checks everyone's facts, studies, and develops my opinions.
You, on the other hand, are a troll. Attacking people for the sake of aggravation.
"Obvious" context is a lot different to facts. Asking for a quote to make it a fact and not just an opinion is fine in my opinion. If you had supplied him one maybe he would back down.
You guys will have to excuse franzpolak. This moonbat must have 300+ posts over the last couple of days, and all of them are nothing more than cut-n-paste mediamatters talking points.
This is yet another foreigner who thinks it's their right to stick their nose into the American domestic policy.
If you'll notice he/she won't directly answer any question that does not have a ready-made non-answer posted on one of the many George Soros funded websites.
I do not know what is funnier, the fact the the left says FOX is fake news or the fact MSLSD tells its viewers that Media Matters and the Huffington Post as well as several other lefty blogs are real news sources. Kind of like the "evil list" of info NBC and MSLSD put out about Palin without checking any sources just to smear her.
That the M.O. of the left. You don't have to be truthful, you just have to be loud. You can apologize for being wrong after the damage is done. Look at what they did to Limbaugh with fake quotes.
Limbaughs "fake"quotes? Like when he accused Micheal J Fox of exagerrating his parkinson's symptoms for his own personal gain? Or was it when he said that feminism was created to allow ugly women access to power? BTW do you agree with Rush on these issues?
Nice spurious detractive argument...only it doesn't work with someone who is of average intelligence or better.
In case you were living with your liberal head in the sand (as usual) I was referring to the fake racial quotes attributed to Rush by liberal demogogues, such as yourself. Nice try to change the context....but I'm not an idiot.
Dear Mr. Intelligent, a spurious argument is one that relies on a false analogy and I fail to see any analogies in my argument. Also to call an argument detractive does not invalidate it logically but just says it was trying to detract from someone or something. You should really look up the words you are trying to use. Also, if you are referring to something you should refer to it directly and not get pendantic and accuse someone of changing the context when there was none. Next!
Dear dumbass, the fake racist quotes were analogous to those made about Palin. It was detractive because you used comments seperate from those in question to validate the ones that were made up about Limbaugh. So, idiot, what I said was a correct description...just over your head.
To address your next post you can google lots of shit on the internet, that doesn't make them true. Try googling Rick Sanchez apologizes for fake quotes.
Also, all of the "fake quotes" you are referring to can be found on youtube by searching for "Rush Limbaugh Racist" where you can see real moving pictures of the man himself being racist.
I also am waiting for a reply to my question! Do you think Micheal J Fox is exaggerating his illness for his personal and financial gain? BTW this should be perfectly OK with any free market guy because personal gain is the only real motivator in the free market and ethics are merely a pesky sideshow event.
Despite the title, nowhere in this video do you show me distorting any facts, deliberately or otherwise. You can see a detailed description of your mistakes in this video on a webpage I created for that purpose at
tinyurl(.)com/HTWWMR5
Don't forget to remove the parentheses when pasting that address into your browser
I hope that helps clear up your misunderstanding and
Anyone ever follow David Shuster? LOL his recommended sources list from Twitter is pretty amazingly biased. Take a look : olbermannwatch[dot]com/images/shuster091025[dot]jpg
Maybe liberal viewer doesn't deliberately distort the facts -- maybe he just suffers from mild autism. Inability to comprehend based on context is certainly a symptom of that.
Btw, there's a definition of this Asperger's/autism type problem that many YouTubers seem to have:
Caetextia — context blindness caused by an inability to keep track of multiple interconnecting variables and to reprioritise any change in those variables by referring to a wider field that contains the history of them. This causes people with caetextia to resort to one of two mental modus operandi: logical, straight-line thinking or thinking by random associations.
great copy and paste! Hey, if you have any facts that you claim are being distorted why don't you refer to them in your comment? You feel like an ad hominem attack has better validity? Of course someone that has caetextia might try to bypass a direct assault on an argument and go instead to a psych text to find a personal attack weapon. I don't know though because I am just a stupid and evil LIBERAL!!!
Big government leftist liberals could not care less that they are lying propagandists. In my 47 years I've never seen the leftist liberals ever care about anything other than getting their way, truth be damned.
Its funny because EVERYONE does it! Only those who don't recognize it in themselves actually have a problem though. They see the world as completely corrupt and against them because they can"t accept that everyone has their own opinion. They view all opposing opinions as a personal and evil attack. That why they frequently use ad hominem attacks to counter them, because anything is justified against evil! Including stupidity!
I think HTWW is wasting too much time debunking the liberalspewer: the media is almost complete lefty propaganda at this time, and they can pump it out faster than we can debunk it 100:1
While Lee supports his position with specific facts, Liberal Viewer seems largely incapable of doing anything other than asking open, pointless rhetorical questions. What about this?!!! Why not that?!!!!! Huh??!! Huh??!!! My Labrador retriever could win a debate with Liberal Viewer. I hope Lee gets whatever issues he has with this nit-picking nit-wit out of his system soon and applies his talents to more important topics.
Liberal viewer isn't worth giving the time of day. I just watched (tried to watch) a couple of his video. That guy is so full of himself that it's unbelievable. He thinks he socially evolved and I'm sure deep inside he's looking down his nose at everyone else on the planet, except those whom he approves of.
Honestly, I think if you have large influence on such a large viewing audience as Fox News does, I would equate that to some form of power. Would there be a a true tea bagger protest without them? I think not. But then again look at what the protests did during the Bush years. Not much. So then again, maybe your right. Fox has no power because ordinary people don't have any power in this country anymore.
I've never understood this... the point of any of these discussions is to try to change people's minds; to maybe get them to agree with or at least understand your point of view. But some people just can't resist throwing in pointless, immature ad hominems (ie Teabagger, Libtard) into their argument. You realize that, with that petty insult, you just lost all credibility you might have had with anyone giving consideration to your point of view? Or are you only here to stroke your own ego?
It was in the video. I just couldn't help it because the idea was fresh in my mind. Besides that, I've kind of given up on swaying people's minds on the issues, sort of. Most people have their minds made up and I have yet to see someone change theirs or someone change mine. It would be nice to see it happen though. Normally I do try to avoid insults though.
The "tea Party" protests were already set and ready to go, thanks to everyday citizens having had enough of EXTREME progressive policies. They would have been just as powerful if Fox News had not reported on them, actually more powerful because then "people" would not be so quick to discredit them...
ok, lee, if people really need to spell it out to you, here are some names that are meant by "everyone", but not fox news: RUSH LIMBAUGH, conservative talk radio (michael savage, jay severin and the sort).
The last time I checked, Limbaugh, Savage, and any other talk show host, don't have a single vote in Congress. They have no power over my life, nor will they. But for the most powerful man on Earth to "speak truth to power", he'd either be in prayer, or delusional.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
limbaugh and savage have a different role to play than rasing your hand when your party orders you to block any kind of meaningful legislation.
most powerful on earth? you're talking about his influence, and not power in function, right? US presidents do not have absolute power and can't boss other countries around, but they can influence them.
so, you acknowledge obama's influence, but not limbaugh's, savage's or anybody on conservative talk radio?
Any man who has the power to kill thousands on a whim, has more power than a talkshow host. Any man who can level a country, start a war, end a war...etc... is powerful in the extreme. Executive order?
Please, what you just said is silly on the face of it.
"Any man who has the power to kill thousands on a whim, has more power than a talkshow host."
if you seriously think that the US president can kill thousands on a "whim", i think you're the one who is silly here. well, you did have bush for 8 years so it can seem that the president has that kind of power.
this is all completely irrelevant. you're talking about influence, and still no recognizing influence of the conservative media (con talk radio, fox etc.).
Obama has ordered illegal bombings of Pakistan via Preditor drones. 18 innocent people died just within Obama's 3rd day in office and he gets a peace prize?
non-sequitur. what does this have to do with anything? the drone war started under the bush presidency, not obama's. and i'm against it, i generally agree with dennis kucinich that the drone war is a violation of international laws regarding nation sovereignty.
Obama order those attacks, I do not care what Bush did. Obama gets treated differently for doing the same shit. Don't you find it funny how the Nobel people over looked that?
i don't remember the right criticising bush for attacking iraq, spying on the nation and outing a CIA agent.
obama gets a lot of heat from the left for not passing healthcare yet, for not being strong enough, for not implementing his campaign promises, for not being tougher on the issue of gay marriage, and finally, for not pulling out of afganistan and iraq.
just check the nation, huffington post columns etc. and you'll see.
Hmmm and you don't remember the left saying it needed to be done for 10 years either right? Bush outing a CIA agent? How about Obama/Pelosi outing the whole CIA? Huffington Post? The Nation? Maybe if i was pro socialist.
funny man. i was talking about the right who bowed their heads infront of overlord cheney and the decider bush.
outing the whole CIA?
you're a moron. valerie plame was put in direct danger by those two nuckleheads, and she served her country in ways your pathetic ass can't even cope with.
pro-socialist? you're an idiot, as it seems. you wouldn't what socialism is if it hit you on the head. i grew up in a socialist country so i know what i'm talking about.
So you are saying this White House isn't outing the CIA? LMAO
I couldn't give a rats ass where your idiot ass grew up to say the "changes" our president wants to do (and has done) isn't headed towards socialism just tells me that you are a blind ideologue.
you don't give a rats ass because you don't care about the facts - you are religious in you political beliefs and do not wish to anything else besides what blind ideologues like rush and beck spoonfeed you.
you don't know what socialism is - without it, we would probably be dead. it is simply politics aimed to society as a whole, and not specifically the individual. you're talking about communism.
you don't have first clue about the bullshit you spout.
@franzpolak Ok name anothe US president that nationalized car companies and the did radio commercials for those companies.
Name another US president who is used and implimented pay czars.
Name another US president who dismissed contracts over bankruptcy laws to give his union buddies preffered stock when they had common stock and then gave bond holders common stock for the bankruptcy.
Shall I get into health care? I can but would be more than 500 words, same with cap and trade.
Difference about the number of czars is the Bush had them by the end of his presidency, Obama has/had them before his first year of his first presidency. Who knows how that number could grow.
The point is, Czars have NEVER had this much control over govermental issues in the past sense the great depression. I mean Obama is practically being ran by the Czars he appointed not the people. ALSO may I state, I for one am not a republican,conservative, liberitarian (sp?) whatever. I am a realist, and I have a vauge understanding of how things tend to work. All you need is a mind and common sense, big statistics mean nothing without common sense.
look. i'm not a obama fan, and i certainly don't agre with him on a lot of things (gay marriage, marijuana, afganistan and iraq etc,) but it's comments like "obama=big government" and the such that piss me off since bush (and his dad, and reagan) have had more political influence over congress, they rammed all kinds of shit without public approval, and now people complain about "czars"?
Also the fact that you "don't remember" doesn't make it so. The only difference is they do not spend 3 months on the same topic. The right also likes DETAILS.
the right pisses all over details. they don't care about context when it comes to their opponents and when they want to commit political murder, but when it's their ass on the line, CONTEXT CONTEXT CONTEXT!
they even jumped to palin's rescue when she said obama wants to kill her mentally challenged son.
Sure Hanz or Franz, you think that while doing the 5 knuckle shuffle looking at pictures in Good Housekeeping. Where is all the detail to truth to power? If you had 2 working brain cells TWH saying THEY ARE TALKING TRUTH TO POWER is really POWER TO POWER.
I have no NO! respect for Democrats/Liberals, anymore, and this brings me no great joy, ): ): because I know that they are human and should know better,,but they don't ): they see only party lines.
It should read "Too" not to. And a dude is a lump of cow doo doo, I don't like being called a lump of cow doo doo (: So you are for big government taking over your life?, good luck with that, dude! (:
The democrat party is not what it was 40 years ago, It is now run by the radical 60's movement. They have been waiting to redesign this place for a long time.
I've just watched all 4 parts and though a significant percentage of the subjects discussed went over my head, I was able to see your points. So, the best I can offer is that this (as a whole) was well presented as it held my attention (uneducated lout that I am).
Liberals are so stupid. They think they can convince people of anything. Kind of how thundef00t attacked you for fake subs when see ZOMGitsCriss, wants to become a partner (Thunderf00t is a moral dilemma) on my channel
hey Lee what are your views on the Copenhagen treaty that the Obamanation is going to singe next month? you know the one were America cedes its sovereignty to the U.N.
get a helmet? are you trying to infer that the gov. want to force people to join the army? because last time i checkd that was a right wing philosophy haha
No! its because you are an IDIOT and we don't want you to hurt yourself when you start banging that empty lump on your shoulders against the wall! Ya asspuppet!
Wow a university Education. Man you must be an expert at everything.
Seriously What university did you get your education from? Did you Graduate? What was your major? Does that major mean that you know more then someone you've never met? Or more likely your narcissism means that.
Yeah they are. I've scored in the highly intelligent range and I've met high school drop outs that I admire intellectually.
So they can't really measure capacity for knowledge or comprehension of that which you learn accurately. They are a more effective measure of WHAT you know....not how or why you know it.
The liberals are so blinded that do not see the light up ahead. They have been sold a pipe dream just like Fidel did to the Cuban people back in 59. History is repeating itself once more.
This is the beginnings of communism plain and simple. Fox News is known for telling everything and they do not want that. Fidel did the same thing that the Obama administration is doing now.
it depends what you watch. ya, if you watch o'reilly all the time, you're not really watching news, but if you watch Special Report, etc., that's actual news.
This is strange. I just finished watching this part 4 and switched to my home page. Guess what is in my " Recomended to you" section? yes. Liberal viewer, Young turks and Amazing Atheist.. Funny how this works.
Most videos here on Youtube sadly don't do a good job on debunking Liberals, but you, so far, are the best. I hope the rest of your videos are like this one. -Fellow conservative
TheUSA95 1 year ago 9
Fox news is a powerful organization. When you call them on something you are speaking truth to power.
customerjon 1 year ago
trash
superfisto 1 year ago
Such a war, Obama made a comment about FOX so all the fundy arseholes like Doren bought all the nonsense about some so called war. FOX hyped the war to build up their ratings. Lil jerks like Doren should take a critical look at the right wing spin he churns out
jakefree24 1 year ago
HowTheWorldWorks, you wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the ass.
If you cannot see the obvious bias in Fox News, andyou cannot see that Fox News has a great deal of influence (Power) over their viewers (idiots like yourself) then you have no choice but to attack LiberalViewer. Everyone has built in bias, but viewers of Fox and Hannity and Beck, listeners of Rush, and his ilk simply want to believe whatever they are told, regardless of the facts. Argue with that.
graymagic1 1 year ago
What are the "facts" about Obama, oh brilliant one?
GovernmentSham912 1 year ago
What do you care about facts?
If you cared about facts, you wouldn't be listening to Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and the rest of them.
But, I'll bite...how about this for a fact.
Fox News is not news, it is purely biased spin. It is neither fair nor balanced. Dick Cheney is a war criminal who should be prosecuted and sent to prison for the rest of his life. How is that for a fact?
graymagic1 1 year ago
You want to hear my own views
I'm against the war in Afghanistan and Iraq
I'm for legalizing marijuana
I'm against torture
I want Dick Cheney and Bush prosecuted
and I'm a conservative
That's not Fox News rhetoric
Now tell me why is Obama doing the opposite of those views I've listed?
GovernmentSham912 1 year ago
@GovernmentSham912
And in what way are you a conservative then? I'm simply curious.
Albyiscool 1 year ago
Good question
I am a more libertarian conservative. I'm not like a ACLU nut.
I believe in a strong national defense, I'm just against the current foreign policy of Bush and Obama. Marijuana abuse went up went they made it illegal like they did alcohol. Leave the drug laws to the states.
Cheney and Bush were a shameful smear on the conservatives like Jimmy Carter was on liberals. Meaning that both of them were progressives that thought the Constitution was nothing.
GovernmentSham912 1 year ago
@GovernmentSham912
Very good answer. I think I might be with you for most of those things
Albyiscool 1 year ago
wow I wasn't expecting that
are you a liberal or conservative and/or Libertarian
GovernmentSham912 1 year ago
@GovernmentSham912
mostly conservative, i like to think with some libertarian leanings
Albyiscool 1 year ago
Comment removed
GovernmentSham912 1 year ago
How about this for another fact:
You attack LiberalViewer because he has a large number of views. So, you figure that attacking him will get you lots of of views. Oh, I know, I don't know what I'm talking about right? Okay..how about stating our own views, (If you have any of your own that weren't give to you by Fox News) spew out all your hate..and let's see ho big a following you get sport.
graymagic1 1 year ago
@graymagic1
Everyone knows there is obvious bias in Fox News (in terms of commentary at least), but then what about bias in print news, or on MSNBC? Once you start to attack one network's bias, if you don't attack the other biases yourself, you become just as biased.
Albyiscool 1 year ago
SHE blaintatly said not just foxs news u fucking idoit, but of coarse it is the biggest source of misinformation, but you are the on taking the words out of context. SHE never said just fox news.
f0rumrr 1 year ago
dropping knowledge like a clumsy librarian
davisfleetwood 2 years ago
Valrie Jarret-
Scaring senior citizens?
taking $500 billion out of Medicare to pay for the plan would make any senior nervous
GovernmentSham912 2 years ago
From what i have heard you say so far, there are no facts, but very subjective opinions.
And don't you think its a bit childish and puny to post a whole series of videos, attacking someone else?
There is such a thing as respectfully disagreeing with someone. Try it!
TheSingaling 2 years ago
LiberalViewer had resorted to such childish tactics for a long time because he because as a public defender such tactics are effective in court. He argues to distort as a tactic. Also he tries to confuse and bury with minutiae. Youtube is a perfect forum for him because there are many fans who need nothing more than a soundbite to satisfy them. The target is FOX NEWS and he is being paid very well to destroy them
KidSheIeen 2 years ago
But he already has sunk lower! If you think that only the people you disagree with get the facts twisted and cherry pick then you're proving that you are doing the same thing! Every human lies to himself. It takes intense discipline to overcome that. Discipline I don't claim to have! So YOU are distorting the facts! Neener neener neener!
jfraas1 2 years ago
You are beyond a moron..at least make some sense or make a decent argument. Liberalviewer just walks all over you with his logical sense and actual facts. You are just a redneck hate monger - typical stupid American who just hates to see an informed intelligent American making an impact!!! Get a brain
3122tan 2 years ago
Your proof that all libs call names, with little facts to support their argument.
Auggie56 2 years ago
Don't you watch any of TWTWW videos? About all he does is call names! I have rarely heard a cogent argument from this schmuck. Oops! Sorry.@Auggie56
jfraas1 2 years ago
Who is TWTWW ? jfraas1 ?
Auggie56 2 years ago
@Auggie56 correction, HTWW. sorry its easy to get such arrogant titles confused. Sure wish I knew How the World Works but i guess i will always be handicapped because I am a liberal. Oh well, you really got me on that one, good rebuttal!
jfraas1 2 years ago
That was awesome 3122
Not ad hominem at all...
oh wait, that's all it was.
TrueEmergence 2 years ago
Bah! Yeah I agree. Sometimes to talk to idiots you have to lower yourself to their level
3122tan 2 years ago
I don't agree with everything HTWW says, but you're attacking in an upsettingly arrogant way. (I'm apolitical btw)
I have seen him present valid facts in more then one debate, very solid facts, and you attacking him ad hominem does you shame.
TrueEmergence 2 years ago
Everyone else is arrogant on here. Dont see you attacking them. Why? You are a right wing nutjob to believe anything that comes out of this guys mouth. Leave me alone
3122tan 2 years ago
I'm not the kind of person who attacks people, I'm the kind of person who sits backs, watches, checks everyone's facts, studies, and develops my opinions.
You, on the other hand, are a troll. Attacking people for the sake of aggravation.
TrueEmergence 2 years ago
The difference between liberal viewer and Howtheworldwork is that one of them is too much of a coward to show his face.
simontimon2 2 years ago
"Obvious" context is a lot different to facts. Asking for a quote to make it a fact and not just an opinion is fine in my opinion. If you had supplied him one maybe he would back down.
dunsedog 2 years ago
More important shit to talk about, give me my 2 mins. back!!!! Oh you sound like a hurt child. do you want me to kiss your boo boo.....
Didyouknowthisstuff 2 years ago
When will you start backing your claims with facts? Your videos are very negative.
oh and don't forget,,, the left is rite & the right is wrong.
JetSSuck729 2 years ago
You should start the video with something to really catch our attention. Like yell "LIBERAL VIEWER?! ARE YOU SERIOUS!!?"
porkramen21 2 years ago
Fuk FOX News
FukPosers 2 years ago
I'm sorry but Liberal Viewer destroyed you. For you to even try to get back at him in such a pathetic manner is well.. pathetic.
Entaruadunexecutor 2 years ago
Doren doesn't sound like he's "destroyed". Actually he's made his point rather well.
Care to elaborate?
DrCruel 2 years ago
+ 1 fuckin 1...LiberalViewer FTW!
DjWhooCares 2 years ago
nice video
JonasFrimodt 2 years ago
Lee, you are trash.
carrierexchange 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Where the hell in this video did he "distort the facts"? Lee, stop making a fucking fool of yourself.
sushiyama1 2 years ago
You guys will have to excuse franzpolak. This moonbat must have 300+ posts over the last couple of days, and all of them are nothing more than cut-n-paste mediamatters talking points.
This is yet another foreigner who thinks it's their right to stick their nose into the American domestic policy.
If you'll notice he/she won't directly answer any question that does not have a ready-made non-answer posted on one of the many George Soros funded websites.
sorrian 2 years ago
I do not know what is funnier, the fact the the left says FOX is fake news or the fact MSLSD tells its viewers that Media Matters and the Huffington Post as well as several other lefty blogs are real news sources. Kind of like the "evil list" of info NBC and MSLSD put out about Palin without checking any sources just to smear her.
tubaboy71 2 years ago 2
That the M.O. of the left. You don't have to be truthful, you just have to be loud. You can apologize for being wrong after the damage is done. Look at what they did to Limbaugh with fake quotes.
sorrian 2 years ago
Limbaughs "fake"quotes? Like when he accused Micheal J Fox of exagerrating his parkinson's symptoms for his own personal gain? Or was it when he said that feminism was created to allow ugly women access to power? BTW do you agree with Rush on these issues?
jfraas1 2 years ago
Nice spurious detractive argument...only it doesn't work with someone who is of average intelligence or better.
In case you were living with your liberal head in the sand (as usual) I was referring to the fake racial quotes attributed to Rush by liberal demogogues, such as yourself. Nice try to change the context....but I'm not an idiot.
sorrian 2 years ago
Dear Mr. Intelligent, a spurious argument is one that relies on a false analogy and I fail to see any analogies in my argument. Also to call an argument detractive does not invalidate it logically but just says it was trying to detract from someone or something. You should really look up the words you are trying to use. Also, if you are referring to something you should refer to it directly and not get pendantic and accuse someone of changing the context when there was none. Next!
jfraas1 2 years ago
Dear dumbass, the fake racist quotes were analogous to those made about Palin. It was detractive because you used comments seperate from those in question to validate the ones that were made up about Limbaugh. So, idiot, what I said was a correct description...just over your head.
To address your next post you can google lots of shit on the internet, that doesn't make them true. Try googling Rick Sanchez apologizes for fake quotes.
Massive failure on your part.
sorrian 2 years ago
Oh yeah...to be as dismissive and arrogant as you....
NEXT!!!!
sorrian 2 years ago
Also, all of the "fake quotes" you are referring to can be found on youtube by searching for "Rush Limbaugh Racist" where you can see real moving pictures of the man himself being racist.
I also am waiting for a reply to my question! Do you think Micheal J Fox is exaggerating his illness for his personal and financial gain? BTW this should be perfectly OK with any free market guy because personal gain is the only real motivator in the free market and ethics are merely a pesky sideshow event.
jfraas1 2 years ago
part 5 has been removed, of course...
really, great argument liberals, blocking free speech
zantrua 2 years ago
How's about the facts? Just the fact? Can that happen in America?
doddsoreric 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lee,
Despite the title, nowhere in this video do you show me distorting any facts, deliberately or otherwise. You can see a detailed description of your mistakes in this video on a webpage I created for that purpose at
tinyurl(.)com/HTWWMR5
Don't forget to remove the parentheses when pasting that address into your browser
I hope that helps clear up your misunderstanding and
thanks for the video :-)
LiberalViewer 2 years ago 12
^^^liberal translation to LD's nonsense.
"Sticks and stones may break my bones but the truth and facts are oblivious to me."
tubaboy71 2 years ago
Anyone ever follow David Shuster? LOL his recommended sources list from Twitter is pretty amazingly biased. Take a look : olbermannwatch[dot]com/images/shuster091025[dot]jpg
tubaboy71 2 years ago
Maybe liberal viewer doesn't deliberately distort the facts -- maybe he just suffers from mild autism. Inability to comprehend based on context is certainly a symptom of that.
ariesvids 2 years ago
Btw, there's a definition of this Asperger's/autism type problem that many YouTubers seem to have:
Caetextia — context blindness caused by an inability to keep track of multiple interconnecting variables and to reprioritise any change in those variables by referring to a wider field that contains the history of them. This causes people with caetextia to resort to one of two mental modus operandi: logical, straight-line thinking or thinking by random associations.
ariesvids 2 years ago
great copy and paste! Hey, if you have any facts that you claim are being distorted why don't you refer to them in your comment? You feel like an ad hominem attack has better validity? Of course someone that has caetextia might try to bypass a direct assault on an argument and go instead to a psych text to find a personal attack weapon. I don't know though because I am just a stupid and evil LIBERAL!!!
jfraas1 2 years ago
Big government leftist liberals could not care less that they are lying propagandists. In my 47 years I've never seen the leftist liberals ever care about anything other than getting their way, truth be damned.
kmg501 2 years ago
Funny, I've noticed the same thing about conservatives.
thecauseandfx 2 years ago
Its funny because EVERYONE does it! Only those who don't recognize it in themselves actually have a problem though. They see the world as completely corrupt and against them because they can"t accept that everyone has their own opinion. They view all opposing opinions as a personal and evil attack. That why they frequently use ad hominem attacks to counter them, because anything is justified against evil! Including stupidity!
jfraas1 2 years ago
Liberal Viewer is a douche bag...
bucjason 2 years ago
Great video. Thanks for posting it.
MissMaria10 2 years ago
I think HTWW is wasting too much time debunking the liberalspewer: the media is almost complete lefty propaganda at this time, and they can pump it out faster than we can debunk it 100:1
Rugghead98 2 years ago
but what's a game of whack-a-mole if you don't have more than you can hit?
yytrert 2 years ago
While Lee supports his position with specific facts, Liberal Viewer seems largely incapable of doing anything other than asking open, pointless rhetorical questions. What about this?!!! Why not that?!!!!! Huh??!! Huh??!!! My Labrador retriever could win a debate with Liberal Viewer. I hope Lee gets whatever issues he has with this nit-picking nit-wit out of his system soon and applies his talents to more important topics.
Troglodite13 2 years ago
Liberal viewer isn't worth giving the time of day. I just watched (tried to watch) a couple of his video. That guy is so full of himself that it's unbelievable. He thinks he socially evolved and I'm sure deep inside he's looking down his nose at everyone else on the planet, except those whom he approves of.
I would ignore him.
conspiracy777 2 years ago
Maybe LiberalViewer is secretly Keith Olbermann :o!
TeHGoodReverend 2 years ago 2
dude some organization probably put this dipshit liberalviewer on here just to fight you lee
MahonFilms 2 years ago
i love how the liberal viewer says he watched msnbc and didnt see any bias.....rofl give me a break
msnbc is hands down, the most in-the-tank voluntarily biased news in history.
Rachel Maddow and Olbermann or horrible! ad-hominem attacks abound! forget legitimate debate! Ad-hominem convinces the masses so much easier!!
VegasBilgeRat 2 years ago
Nothing tests the advancement of humankind than some good ol' youtube channel-to-channel bashing.
AndainPT 2 years ago
Why does he fear the truth?
QshesshoumaruQ 2 years ago 4
"Power" is anyone who can legally put a gun to my head. To my knowledge, Fox News, Tea Party, Rush, Savage, Beck, can not do this.
boxant 2 years ago 7
Heh....and they said I'd never be famous.
I got my name in lights. Where's my Oscar? I've done more to deserve that than one particular Nobel winner has done.
sorrian 2 years ago
Honestly, I think if you have large influence on such a large viewing audience as Fox News does, I would equate that to some form of power. Would there be a a true tea bagger protest without them? I think not. But then again look at what the protests did during the Bush years. Not much. So then again, maybe your right. Fox has no power because ordinary people don't have any power in this country anymore.
chjoezen 2 years ago
I've never understood this... the point of any of these discussions is to try to change people's minds; to maybe get them to agree with or at least understand your point of view. But some people just can't resist throwing in pointless, immature ad hominems (ie Teabagger, Libtard) into their argument. You realize that, with that petty insult, you just lost all credibility you might have had with anyone giving consideration to your point of view? Or are you only here to stroke your own ego?
FreemanicParacusia 2 years ago
It was in the video. I just couldn't help it because the idea was fresh in my mind. Besides that, I've kind of given up on swaying people's minds on the issues, sort of. Most people have their minds made up and I have yet to see someone change theirs or someone change mine. It would be nice to see it happen though. Normally I do try to avoid insults though.
chjoezen 2 years ago
The "tea Party" protests were already set and ready to go, thanks to everyday citizens having had enough of EXTREME progressive policies. They would have been just as powerful if Fox News had not reported on them, actually more powerful because then "people" would not be so quick to discredit them...
shoutanoise 2 years ago
The turnout would have probably had a higher I.Q. as well. Oops there I go again.
chjoezen 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ok, lee, if people really need to spell it out to you, here are some names that are meant by "everyone", but not fox news: RUSH LIMBAUGH, conservative talk radio (michael savage, jay severin and the sort).
forgot about them, maybe?
franzpolak 2 years ago
The last time I checked, Limbaugh, Savage, and any other talk show host, don't have a single vote in Congress. They have no power over my life, nor will they. But for the most powerful man on Earth to "speak truth to power", he'd either be in prayer, or delusional.
Nice choice to have.
ravenslaves 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
limbaugh and savage have a different role to play than rasing your hand when your party orders you to block any kind of meaningful legislation.
most powerful on earth? you're talking about his influence, and not power in function, right? US presidents do not have absolute power and can't boss other countries around, but they can influence them.
so, you acknowledge obama's influence, but not limbaugh's, savage's or anybody on conservative talk radio?
inconsistency much?
franzpolak 2 years ago
Any man who has the power to kill thousands on a whim, has more power than a talkshow host. Any man who can level a country, start a war, end a war...etc... is powerful in the extreme. Executive order?
Please, what you just said is silly on the face of it.
ravenslaves 2 years ago
"Any man who has the power to kill thousands on a whim, has more power than a talkshow host."
if you seriously think that the US president can kill thousands on a "whim", i think you're the one who is silly here. well, you did have bush for 8 years so it can seem that the president has that kind of power.
this is all completely irrelevant. you're talking about influence, and still no recognizing influence of the conservative media (con talk radio, fox etc.).
franzpolak 2 years ago
Obama has ordered illegal bombings of Pakistan via Preditor drones. 18 innocent people died just within Obama's 3rd day in office and he gets a peace prize?
tubaboy71 2 years ago 2
non-sequitur. what does this have to do with anything? the drone war started under the bush presidency, not obama's. and i'm against it, i generally agree with dennis kucinich that the drone war is a violation of international laws regarding nation sovereignty.
franzpolak 2 years ago
Obama order those attacks, I do not care what Bush did. Obama gets treated differently for doing the same shit. Don't you find it funny how the Nobel people over looked that?
tubaboy71 2 years ago
i don't remember the right criticising bush for attacking iraq, spying on the nation and outing a CIA agent.
obama gets a lot of heat from the left for not passing healthcare yet, for not being strong enough, for not implementing his campaign promises, for not being tougher on the issue of gay marriage, and finally, for not pulling out of afganistan and iraq.
just check the nation, huffington post columns etc. and you'll see.
franzpolak 2 years ago
Hmmm and you don't remember the left saying it needed to be done for 10 years either right? Bush outing a CIA agent? How about Obama/Pelosi outing the whole CIA? Huffington Post? The Nation? Maybe if i was pro socialist.
tubaboy71 2 years ago
funny man. i was talking about the right who bowed their heads infront of overlord cheney and the decider bush.
outing the whole CIA?
you're a moron. valerie plame was put in direct danger by those two nuckleheads, and she served her country in ways your pathetic ass can't even cope with.
pro-socialist? you're an idiot, as it seems. you wouldn't what socialism is if it hit you on the head. i grew up in a socialist country so i know what i'm talking about.
franzpolak 2 years ago
So you are saying this White House isn't outing the CIA? LMAO
I couldn't give a rats ass where your idiot ass grew up to say the "changes" our president wants to do (and has done) isn't headed towards socialism just tells me that you are a blind ideologue.
tubaboy71 2 years ago
you don't give a rats ass because you don't care about the facts - you are religious in you political beliefs and do not wish to anything else besides what blind ideologues like rush and beck spoonfeed you.
you don't know what socialism is - without it, we would probably be dead. it is simply politics aimed to society as a whole, and not specifically the individual. you're talking about communism.
you don't have first clue about the bullshit you spout.
franzpolak 2 years ago
@franzpolak actually I am a democrat dip shit.
tubaboy71 2 years ago
so the fuck what?
you obviously support right wing policies since you think obama's policies are reminiscent of socialism, what is nowhere near the truth.
you're a democrat? in what way, dipshit? in the way that you think obama is a socialist. please, take your nonsense somewhere else.
franzpolak 2 years ago
@franzpolak Ok name anothe US president that nationalized car companies and the did radio commercials for those companies.
Name another US president who is used and implimented pay czars.
Name another US president who dismissed contracts over bankruptcy laws to give his union buddies preffered stock when they had common stock and then gave bond holders common stock for the bankruptcy.
Shall I get into health care? I can but would be more than 500 words, same with cap and trade.
tubaboy71 2 years ago 2
"Ok name anothe US president that nationalized car companies and the did radio commercials for those companies."
george bush nationalized more companies than any other US president.
"Name another US president who is used and implimented pay czars."
bush and obama have the same number of "czars", as far as i know.
this last part - wtf? i'm having a hard time finding a source on that. a little help?
health care? nothing socialist about it.
franzpolak 2 years ago
1. When did he do this? If you are talking about TARP HOW the stock/loans were taken care of was given solely to Obama.
2. That is not what I asked.
3. Look up "angry GM and Chysler bond holders"
Everything is Socialist about the health care it is PURE redistribution of wealth with force.
tubaboy71 2 years ago
Difference about the number of czars is the Bush had them by the end of his presidency, Obama has/had them before his first year of his first presidency. Who knows how that number could grow.
Death0Proof 2 years ago
bush had a total of 47 "czars", to my knowledge. and most of them were brought into office before 2005.
glenn beck lists 32 obama czars (and, may i add, some of them are not considered czars at all).
franzpolak 2 years ago
Wrong actually, he had 47 appointees
and 35 czars in total.
Death0Proof 2 years ago
no. they were czars according to logic used on obama.
but, i'll grant you taht number - he still had more than obama, and nobody on the right screamed about it all the time.
franzpolak 2 years ago
The point is, Czars have NEVER had this much control over govermental issues in the past sense the great depression. I mean Obama is practically being ran by the Czars he appointed not the people. ALSO may I state, I for one am not a republican,conservative, liberitarian (sp?) whatever. I am a realist, and I have a vauge understanding of how things tend to work. All you need is a mind and common sense, big statistics mean nothing without common sense.
Death0Proof 2 years ago
look. i'm not a obama fan, and i certainly don't agre with him on a lot of things (gay marriage, marijuana, afganistan and iraq etc,) but it's comments like "obama=big government" and the such that piss me off since bush (and his dad, and reagan) have had more political influence over congress, they rammed all kinds of shit without public approval, and now people complain about "czars"?
give me a break.
franzpolak 2 years ago
The difference between Reagan and Obama, Reagan = Good for america, Obama = not so good for america.
Death0Proof 2 years ago
then get a time machine if you don't like the present.
franzpolak 2 years ago
god ur so delusional
DjWhooCares 2 years ago
@Death0Proof
not a fact, just an opinion
TheSingaling 2 years ago
Also the fact that you "don't remember" doesn't make it so. The only difference is they do not spend 3 months on the same topic. The right also likes DETAILS.
tubaboy71 2 years ago
the right pisses all over details. they don't care about context when it comes to their opponents and when they want to commit political murder, but when it's their ass on the line, CONTEXT CONTEXT CONTEXT!
they even jumped to palin's rescue when she said obama wants to kill her mentally challenged son.
franzpolak 2 years ago
Sure Hanz or Franz, you think that while doing the 5 knuckle shuffle looking at pictures in Good Housekeeping. Where is all the detail to truth to power? If you had 2 working brain cells TWH saying THEY ARE TALKING TRUTH TO POWER is really POWER TO POWER.
tubaboy71 2 years ago
wtf are you talking about?
if you just keep rambling off topic, this discussion is pointless.
don't drink and comment.
franzpolak 2 years ago
@franzpolak Don't be a mouth breather
tubaboy71 2 years ago
I wonder whether LV is knowingly ignoring the truth or if he really believes what he says.
mackdan7 2 years ago 2
How long will this war go on?
SSj4Monster 2 years ago
Well done Lee!
zzx2847 2 years ago 2
Thanks for illustrating the nature of their lies. I appreciate your taking the time to do so.
pinegrove33 2 years ago 3
I have no NO! respect for Democrats/Liberals, anymore, and this brings me no great joy, ): ): because I know that they are human and should know better,,but they don't ): they see only party lines.
NCLUSA 2 years ago 2
the conservatives are like that to dude maybe if you actually met a liberal in real life you would realize that what your saying is bs.
maxamojaxamo 2 years ago
It should read "Too" not to. And a dude is a lump of cow doo doo, I don't like being called a lump of cow doo doo (: So you are for big government taking over your life?, good luck with that, dude! (:
NCLUSA 2 years ago
The democrat party is not what it was 40 years ago, It is now run by the radical 60's movement. They have been waiting to redesign this place for a long time.
Minionuup 2 years ago
@Minionuup Yes, you are right, but now what can we do?
NCLUSA 2 years ago
Start paying attention to the people we elect. The politicians, and especially the judges. The statist uses Judges to trump law and redesign society.
Minionuup 2 years ago
liberalviewer is an asshole
insanity401 2 years ago 4
Five Stars!!
MadBadVoodo 2 years ago
LV... you have been pwned... please sit down...
vint7107 2 years ago 2
What does "truth to power" mean?
It almost feels like you two are arguing over the proper way to open an egg.
DansLookingGlass 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LV didn't ask you for a quote, but other people commenting on your videos.
So I am wondering, is your disdain for LV the reason you banned people who had a subscription to LV from your sub list?
serintal 2 years ago
He sent me several private messages directed to me genius.
HowTheWorldWorks 2 years ago
But the comments you showed in your video were of him askinf other people. If he did ask you in PMs then why not show those instead.
serintal 2 years ago
He did show those, or atleast a partial list of them. He also explained that he wasn't going to respond to the stalker.
sorrian 2 years ago
I understand that, but he never showed LV asking HTWW so I was a bit confused.
serintal 2 years ago
@serintal
hope not cause that's me. :)
It's interesting to hear views from all over the political spectrum, I don't think someone should limit themselves to one point of view.
spazabarri 2 years ago
Ass kicking four-part series.
Way to go in exposing the intellectual dishonesty.
chicom70 2 years ago 5
I have more to come today.
HowTheWorldWorks 2 years ago
hey I NEED you to tell people the horrific heath care Bill passing "House of Representatives "
realhxq 2 years ago
Keep up the AWESOME work HOWTHEWORLDWORKS
fireupgoku 2 years ago 5
I`m having so much fun watching these.. nice work!
Phillyprnc 2 years ago 3
You are such a fuckin tool. You want to rumble? I do it on FB. Casey M. Ferguson. I dare you to show up. Get out of your bubble.
ljrichardson84 2 years ago
I've just watched all 4 parts and though a significant percentage of the subjects discussed went over my head, I was able to see your points. So, the best I can offer is that this (as a whole) was well presented as it held my attention (uneducated lout that I am).
Cavetroll100 2 years ago
I'm sorry but diliberatly distorting the truth is a crime you yourself are guilty of everytime you talk about medical care in England.
GeneralTagatashi 2 years ago
HTWW speaking to LV. Is speaking Truth to Dumbass!
bsharker 2 years ago 3
Liberals are so stupid. They think they can convince people of anything. Kind of how thundef00t attacked you for fake subs when see ZOMGitsCriss, wants to become a partner (Thunderf00t is a moral dilemma) on my channel
theanswersofnwo3 2 years ago
hey Lee what are your views on the Copenhagen treaty that the Obamanation is going to singe next month? you know the one were America cedes its sovereignty to the U.N.
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
Why not make one grand pwnage video instead of ten petty ones?
MusicalEutopia 2 years ago
damn this was not what i expected
i thought you would show a statistic or a complete argument that was made up by liberalviewer
instead all i saw was your views on events that happend that differ from his views
both views can be seen as correct but this video was just you argueing wether the cup is half full or half empty
very poor show
BGDPPL 2 years ago
LMFAO!! Only to BiGDumbassPeoPLe like you! assclown! Now GET A HELMET!!!
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
get a helmet? are you trying to infer that the gov. want to force people to join the army? because last time i checkd that was a right wing philosophy haha
BGDPPL 2 years ago
No! its because you are an IDIOT and we don't want you to hurt yourself when you start banging that empty lump on your shoulders against the wall! Ya asspuppet!
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh you mean the empty lump on my shoulders that has 136 iq and university education?
as apposed to yours? which i presume has gotten you what? a pig far in alabama?
you keep on trying billybob
maby one day you will pass your 3rd grade tests
BGDPPL 2 years ago
You can't spell FARM and your calling me a 3rd grader!! ROTFFLMFAO!!! OK brainballz!!!!!!
Mrcharliebobo 2 years ago
Wow a university Education. Man you must be an expert at everything.
Seriously What university did you get your education from? Did you Graduate? What was your major? Does that major mean that you know more then someone you've never met? Or more likely your narcissism means that.
zakneifien 2 years ago
You're IQ score from online tests (guessing what number comes next) is worthless.
Without knowing the date and what test you took, the number means nothing.
Having a university education doesn't magically make someone smarter than someone who only graduated high school.
sorrian 2 years ago 2
@sorrian
IQ tests are useless anyway
AbdielAbiram 2 years ago
Yeah they are. I've scored in the highly intelligent range and I've met high school drop outs that I admire intellectually.
So they can't really measure capacity for knowledge or comprehension of that which you learn accurately. They are a more effective measure of WHAT you know....not how or why you know it.
sorrian 2 years ago
The last time the draft was initiated was under a democrat.
zakneifien 2 years ago 3
Actually wasn't it Mr Great Society" LBJ and Mr New Deal FDR who liked the military drafts?
tubaboy71 2 years ago
Thank you for the wonderful videos, keep up the good work!
elan3002 2 years ago
LiberalViewer you are a jerk.
clash360 2 years ago 4
LiberalViewer is an idiot.
Uutton 2 years ago 5
The liberals are so blinded that do not see the light up ahead. They have been sold a pipe dream just like Fidel did to the Cuban people back in 59. History is repeating itself once more.
MrRonnierams 2 years ago 4
This is the beginnings of communism plain and simple. Fox News is known for telling everything and they do not want that. Fidel did the same thing that the Obama administration is doing now.
MrRonnierams 2 years ago 3
Great work today Lee!
mrmanown 2 years ago
it was every bit as satisfying as i hoped it would be.
fudgemanofdoom 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
*Fox Entertainment*
They're far from a news organization.
rajask120 2 years ago
it depends what you watch. ya, if you watch o'reilly all the time, you're not really watching news, but if you watch Special Report, etc., that's actual news.
megaminxmaster 2 years ago
I guess Van Jones and ACORN are pretty cool huh?
tubaboy71 2 years ago 2
they dont attack msnbc because they agree with them, lol.
AppleSoldier 2 years ago
LiberalSpewer's sorry ass is gonna be really sore after today. But he's probably used to that, and enjoys and is proud of it.
obamaisapieceofshit 2 years ago 3
Just remember the words of Lenny Bruce: "If you don't say 'fuck', you can't say 'Fuck the government.'"
loqutor 2 years ago
Down with Neo-cons.
Down with RINO's.
airborne373 2 years ago 4
Awesome, keep up the good work Lee
Connnacht 2 years ago 2
yay for youtube bash wars. let me get some pop corn . its always fun to watch
jordler 2 years ago 2
This is strange. I just finished watching this part 4 and switched to my home page. Guess what is in my " Recomended to you" section? yes. Liberal viewer, Young turks and Amazing Atheist.. Funny how this works.