OF COURSE THEY PAID FOR A BOOB JOB!!! It's beauty pageant, and if the blond next to her has bigger boobs than her then maybe I pick her over Carrie. It's a no brainer.
carrie don't give your fake tah tah's back because you well be so flat chested everyone will think you're a little gay boy then again maybe you are, maybe you've had a total sex change you do look a little Man'ish
Catch Carrie Prejeans exclusive sex tape at finestfreaks,com an outlet site to the original..sign up search her name and enjoy..pretty good flick actually ; )
It's worth saying again: She needs to marry an evangelist; build a crystal church and slap crippled people around making them believe they're healed. This woman was born to work with her hands.
What a stupid bimbo. I can't wait to beat off to this hypocrites sex tape.
A blonde, rich, conservative, christian girl is never going to know discrimination in this country. Just because people responded in a loud way to her bigoted views, that doesn't mean her rights are being taken away.
And I really can't stand the way she keeps congratulating and complimenting herself on being so brave and courageous blah blah blah...
Basically, giving privileges to any abnormal group means giving special privileges to them all, due to a concept called "precedent". Namely, if we give Pervert Group A any special privileges or concessions, then Pervert Group B will demand them too, and C, and so on, each group, using the group(s) before it to crowbar the law open a little wider...
After all, if you can defend queers changing the definition of marriage, how can you refuse bigamists, for instance? Or pedos? Where is the line?
WTF!? abnormal? what is abnormal? 12% of the population is gay, always has been, thats the norm. There are gay people. Marriage is a right. If it is a priviedge, they can take it away. I don't know of anyone, not even convicted murderers who aren't given the "priviledge" to marry. And who are you to say what gay people do is "perversion"? This is why you don't understand the issue. You smear all facts with your bigotry. You see the world through a very narrow lense my friend.
If it always has been, then why the sudden push now to get married? Why wasn't it an issue before? What caused them to come out of the closet en-masse?
As to tax-paying, yes, but they're trying to CHANGE the law, that's the whole issue, isn't it?
And Brandonmc, maybe you haven't seen the results of No Child Left Behind, but that's another sidetrack, isn't it?
And saaweeet, it's not about anal sex, it's about two entities of the same sex, rather than different ones, as the definition says.
"If it always has been, then why the sudden push now to get married?"
Oh I don't know. I am sure alot of people in Alabama said the same thing to african americans when they wanted equal rights in the 50s. People are more and more comfortable to come out of the closet, and they want to live just like everyone else.
Now you're going in circles: They DON'T want to LIVE like everyone else, they just want the PRIVILEGES of the normal people.
And this time, YOU are getting it confused with race. I will point out there are minority neighborhoods where whites don't go unless they REALLY want to die, and various minority pride groups that are allowed and even encouraged, but White Pride is somehow considered evil...How does that work?
If someone had a Straight Pride parade, would that be bigoted discrimination?
As to minorities, that plays into MY argument, not yours, they want to be TREATED equally, but not ACT equally. Look up the Uhuru Movement or the NAACP's various boners for proof.
Or the double-standard of the use of, "Nigger" (And variants)
Or how enforcing our immigration laws and our flag/language are considered racist, just because the majority of the invaders HAPPEN to be Hispanics?
Again, we're allowing the tail to wag the dog, the minority to control the majority through complaints!
#1 can fit so many things that aren't perverted. It is desired to not be overweight. If I am, does that make obesity perverted? I think you lean more to try to file it under #4. But then, it becomes opinion, and not fact. pedofilia is illegal, it is wrong, it fits all very well. I would call pedophilia perverted, not homosexuality.
And as to your question about murderers being allowed to marry. Do I think it's good? No... I don't think it's bad either. I think It's 2 adults, doing something legal. I may not agree with it, but well, thats my opinion.
I guess I am just bigotted against bigotry then. Just remember one thing. This is the year 2009. Since "men" was defined as white landowning males, things have changed alot. Rights have been extended to women, native americans, african americans, all ethnicities. Homosexual couples should be allowed the same rights any heterosexual couples get. ( Insurance, visitations and "say-so" in the hospitals, retirement benifits, etc..) How does their personal business effect you personally?
They shouldn't care about my opinion, and the law shouldn't care about theirs...They know what they have to do to get married legally, and they want what they want, so it's an impasse.
You keep saying "definition of marriage". Did you know, gay marriage is defined under marriage in the webster dictionary? They also define bigot as "a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance." You sound like one to me. Just saying. Have a nice day.
Yes, queer marriage IS part of the definition of marriage:
4. a relationship in which two people have pledged themselves to each other in the manner of a husband and wife, without legal sanction: trial marriage; homosexual marriage.
Of course you don't see it as bigotted, but it is. Just like the justice of the peace who wouldn't marry the interacial couple, but said he wasn't a racist. You may not see it as such, but it indeed is.
Nothing bigoted about it, genius, just that they want to be commended for the bravery of breaking our taboos, but there are some taboos that shouldn't be broken--and once broken, they should take the consequences.
But seriously, why are we being sidetracked with queers, when there's the border, taxing outsourcing, or finding what nutritional deficit is causing our womenfolk NOT to grow breasts, that would benefit EVERYONE!
If you believe paying taxes exempts you from legal and social strictures of our society, try public urination, indecent exposure, or solicitation!
(Ironic side-note: Local queers got an anti-prostitution law removed, because it made it illegal to publicly solicit for anal sex--they didn't notice it was under the "prostitution" section. Now prostitutes can be arrested for being prostitutes, rather than based on which acts they specialize in! HA!)
I'm not acting out, and just because you pay taxes does not give you any immunity to existing laws...
If you act different, you will be treated different. And the more obvious you make your "different", the more severe the repercussions. Something about the limbic system, humans and other predators can subconsciously and immediately target the one that's different.
I abruptly realize my Logic professor's old saying, "You can't prove a negative".
So what reasons are FOR allowing queer marriages?
Is it the tax discount?
You can't argue the "natural" bit, I rebutted that already a few pages back.
Assuming America is still a representative republic, why should a MINORITY be allowed to dictate rules for the majority? Will-to-power through "victimhood"?
Also, what CAUSES queers? If not choice, then genetic or psychological malady? Where's the research into cure?
Ok, but next, why do queers not only want marriage, in violation of the definition, but treat it as a "right"? It's something that is licensed, so therefore, it becomes a privilege, like driving, owning a pet, etc.
They can live together, without being married. And additionally, there's a financial reason to disallow marriage: Married people pay slightly less taxes UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES, than two singles.
Who said anything about Christianity? Marriage is a LEGAL concept.
And that's very nice, Obama lets others do his mudslinging so he can maintain plausible deniability.
Interracial is not part of the definition. It says man and woman. Get your dictionary if you don't believe me. Online dictionary sites are as CLOSE as the Internet comes to politically neutral, but some still don't trust them.
Obama is only tangentially related to this, in that he's a nutcase who wants "equal" treatment, except for the bad parts. Bush got called a monkey constantly, Obama was pissed when a political cartoon IMPLIED he was a monkey.
Queers want "equal" treatment, EXCEPT for violating the spirit and definition of the word marriage as I posted earlier. They COULD marry, but that would be bisexuality and/or a huge lie...
EPGAH, you do realize that marrying outside your race was once taboo right? Even today there is a guy who won't to interracial marriages. Times change and I'd like for you to say how the world would end if gays got married. Besides its none of you or government's business to tell people how to live. I thought you conservatives were all for that.
Tehantliberal brought up Obama, and since then, it because a second topic in the same thread.
As to "You're either with us or against us", that was a Bible paraphrase, but we OFFERED other countries to come with, and SOME did at first, but they dropped out, and then bitched that America was doing things unilaterally. If you're not part of the solution, you don't get to complain that America's doing it alone...
Well, although it's a bit off-topic, SAYING is not DOING, and Obama more or less sold us out by bailing out the corporations...The idea of deregulation was to let the incompetent fail, and the good succeed, right?
As to foreign policy, we asked others to help us spank Hussein, but one-by-one, they dropped out. France went the extra step of SELLING WEAPONS to the terrorists!
If we interfere, people bitch that we're imperialist; if we don't interfere, people bitch that we don't care!
Yes, saaweeet, but remember, they didn't ask her a marshmallow question about world peace, kittens, puppies and Disney birdies, they asked her if queers should be allowed to marry.
And Obama is getting an award for doing nothing, plus, he's pulling more boners than Bush, but if anyone calls him on it, it MUST be because he's black, not because he's incompetent, right?
Also note the hypocrisy when one side wants free expression, but calls the other side a "meanie" for expressing THEMselves?
Wait a mintue, if she got a boob job doesn't that mean she isn't happy with the way god made her? Also, what does the bible say about estravegence (buying new boobs), lust (posing nude), despair (not happy with her body), pride (the beauty pageant is as prideful as they come), vainglory (she keeps saying she is a messiah of god), how many of the seven deadly sins has she broken? 5/7 -_-... she is so going to heaven.
I'm on a role, first I proved Jesus was a socialist now this.
It was topless actually, and you don't have to look to far to find one. Check out the pic @ 2:18, that star is not part of the photoshoot, it's a censor.
Anna Please put up and Auction for Dinner and A Movie Date So I can win it and Be the Happiest Guy on EARTH!!! LOL. I Luv You Anna, So Amazingly Beautiful! Have I flattered you to death yet hahaha!
yet another example of the cruelty and oppression of christianity in obamas america, she first lost the contest because she stood up for god, she then had to sue because she was constantly insulted and harrassed for her faith in christ, and now their trying to take everything they can away from her. when christ returns hel look at what the liberals have done with utter disgust and disdain.
About time christians get a taste of the cruelty and oppression they have dealt out for thousands of years...the disgust jeebus would feel would be directed at you fake ass religious zealots
tehant1liberal.you wouldn't know christian persecution if it fell on top of you. she is no more a martyr anymore then you are intelligent. she is an opportunistic bimbo, for herself
More than likely a description of yourself without the hot part lol
Typical of the left, claim lies and slander takes place against them when they are in fact the ones guilty of perpetrating twice as much the other way, slowly, day by day. The left is getting found out for what it really is, fascism on the march
lol - this ho desecrates her body, and if she ever has a baby will not be able to feed it. i doubt she will ever be a mother, she is too obsessed and in love with herself.
who told U Obama had anything to do with it, satan??
I'm here for Jesus, god everything good, natural and holy, that's why I'm not returning the money for my unnatural tit job, that if god wanted me to have I would have been born with, (Leviticus 19:28), but it's okay for me because I'm white, and we can pick and choose what we want from the bible, like no homos or Mexicans.
i disagree. in a perfect world everyone would have a great set of naturals, but lots of girls arent blessed with great tits. fake tits are fine as long as they don't get carried away. a friend once told me fake tits are like mcdonalds french fries.......they may not be 100% real but there still damn good.
I hate boob jobs, nice boobs are what makes them so special, not evryone can have them. And when models get them, they look goofy, big tits on bones eww!
True, big fake tits devalue the real ones, kind of like how making your own money makes REAL money less valuable...or hell, the Fed Reserve printing more money makes money less valuable too!
But no, she's not hatemongering, she's standing up for what she believes, and if the queers can stand up for their "freedom of expression", why can't a dumb bimbo?
BTW, where did she pose nude? I will need to...confiscate the images!
Well, while it's fishy that the Miss USA Pageant organization paid for her implants, I didn't see them X-Raying all the boobs looking for artificial ingredients, so it's kinda unfair to single HER out!
ana is hotter than prejean! even if you don't count ana's brains, prejean has this artificial barbie look that makes her look more like an inflatable doll than a woman
Yes, that's why my friend suggested a pageant with CyberDolls instead of humans...Or take it one step further, put a variety of wigs and breast implants from handheld to paperweight to table-breakers, and have the judges pick the combo that seems most pleasing to them...
I don't like government spending, but government spending on boob jobs is fine with me. It makes women more fuckable. It makes them look better. Jesus Christ advocated boob jobs to make birds hotter. We should not spend any money on health care. We need to spend more money on boob jobs to make women better, to make them more attractive, to make them more fuckable.
All tax money must fight breast cancer and pay for boob jobs.
I titfuck girls 6 nights a week. On my yacht. You are poor.
Hell, just cutting welfare alone would free up enough money for your pet project, Homeland Security.
AIDS USED to be just a homosexual disease, but denial that it WAS a new disease and tardy banning of infected blood from blood-banks made it EVERYONE'S problem. Oh, and people who were straight in public, queer in private(s) helped make AIDS a crossover success!
Actually, I subscribe to the theory that it was artitficially created, although to what end, I'm still...conflicted.
Young Turks would be far better if it was just the lovely lady doing the show, just to watch her is exciting to me, she won't have to talk, she can just sit there , maybe show some lots of top skin as she is doing in this video. I admit, I did not realize in other videos she is that big breasted, I figured her to be a 'C'
As someone else said, she's dieting which reduced her breasts, but suddenly they made a comeback, which leads me to suspect artitficial "help"....Sadly, unless she goes up for a Pageant, the world may never know!
fake, real - doesn't matter. What matters is whether you can bust a nut on that chest and shoot some into the face. I'd hit it and quit it, since that's what Jesus teaches in the Bible. Titty fuck the white girl and move on. Hit it and quit it, turn the other cheek, same meaning. Jesus was about getting BJs and titfucks. Especially from married broads. Get out there and fuck more. if they say no, you put a gun to their head. Get the pussy you own. All men own all pussy.
Filling your boobs with saline to enhance your appearance and make yourself more attractive to the opposite sex is definitely the Christian thing to do.
Strawman argument. This isn't about Ana or her exquisite, luscious bosom (*drools*). Not only that, Ana wasn't in a fucking pageant. Nor does she work for the company that HELD the pageant.
This is about Prejean's tits & the fact that she wasn't fulfilling her contractual expectations as an employee of that company. The augmentation was conditional to her doing the job. When she void the contract, she voided the accessory benefits of the job (ie her saline sacs). Try again mate.
You're nuts, Ana has some tig ol' bitties. But she's slimming down so her adipose tissue is an anatomical victim. I must say though, your infatuation with NAMBLA & MJ's alleged victims speaks volumes. I think maybe you should talk to someone.
Irrespective, the implants may or may not have been part of the "push" but it doesn't make sense. I say that because everyone in the pageant works for the same company. It's not like NBA squads battling. This is like an intra-team scrimmage.
I know, sadly, the Itty Bitty Titty Committee is taking over TV as well as reality...*Plays dirge on violin*
It doesn't make sense that they'd give them to her and then demand them back afterward--especially WITHOUT A CONTRACT! Are they going to sell them on E-Bay, or what?
And actually, I used to volunteer to work with and protect abused kids, so I'm a little more sensitive to the topic than most...
They didn't demand the titties back. They demanded that she pay for them because she breached her contract. Again, you're making the assumption that it's a competition for independent parties. No, this is basically an LLC, with employees in every state, territory, commonwealth & plantation, that held a pageant. One the reqs for those employees was that they make appearances. The boob job may have been a benefit just like Rockies tickets were a benefit at my old job. Understand?
No. I just don't get to keep getting discounted tickets. And since I fulfilled that job's reqs during my tenure there, everything kosher.
She's not being punished for losing. Win or lose doesn't matter. She had an appearance circuit to which she's expected to tend. When she doesn't, she voids her own contract & the benefits in it. Why are you missing that?
But why would they WANT to control the life×, let alone appearances, of someone who lost because she couldn't keep her mouth shut and parrot cotton-candy lies?
It doesn't matter if her contract was to win or work. What's paramount here is that she DIDN'T WORK. She didn't scheduled appearances. Instead she popped up on the "Today Show" & "Hannity". She breached the contract, she pays for the boobs they bought her. Understand?
I am on Carrie's side here. I think there is something intrinsically wrong with a beauty pagent paying for boob jobs! What about promoting natural curves, or not. They can whistle for their money.
They didn't TELL her to get a boob-job, they PAID for it!
Also, she was against queer marriage, right?
Why wasn't she asked an easier question, like the other bimbo who actually won?
And for that matter, why are so many perversions, from queers to pedophiles, becoming protected minorities, rather than keeping perversion SECRET, so that others don't know about it, and thus, can't down them for it?
She got a boob job and got screwed, and not in the fun way...
That's a nifty rhetorical trick you just pulled. You took pedophilia (which is illegal in this country), homosexuality (which is very legal among consenting parties) & race identified groups (which is comprised of minorities who can't control who their parents are) and wrapped them all into a neat little package so you point your shotgun-style critique at them.
That trick was neat but ultimately is was ineffective. Google the word "nuance" & tell me what you come up with.
Again, you've made a very cunning error. Subtle & minor are not the same thing. In fact, subtle, while small, is what distinguishes things. But I see what your issue is. You're a Bill O'Reiily type of logician.
I'd like you to show me a case that NAMBLA has won. Also, show me where they've used homosexuality to justify sex with underage boys THEN applied it to the court case.
Again, you can't put all minorities under the same umbrella. Why? Because it lacks the richness of nuance.
Curley v. NAMBLA was a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in 2000, by Barbara and Robert Curley against the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).
Hell, the very EXISTENCE of NAMBLA and the Black Orchid Club indicate some exemption from the law.
Why should certain groups get to ignore rules they find inconvenient--and yet turn around and expect protection of the "right" to ignore the rules?
I figured you'd say the Curley case. But you're cherry picking in addition to misreading the precedent. For 1, if it were an actual molestation case, the State would be the plaintiff. Also, NAMBLA only victory is that they are allowed to exist. There's nothing in the ruling that allows them to "practice". In America, thoughts & desires aren't necessarily illegal. Actions, however, can be. Try again mate.
Don't get me wrong, I don't support NAMBLA at all but I respect their right to be. In fact, it's a civil liberty endowed by the 1st Amendment. In that respect, the ACLU was correct. Also, unless the boys were molested, they crime to which they were victims was ogling. Again, you're using some extremely poor logic.
I don't respect their right to have a victims gallery...And nowadays, you can get sued for sexual harassment just for ogling, let alone talking about Seinfeld Episodes.
But again, why is it a "violation of privacy" for the perverts to be tracked on the Internet, but perverts tracking kids is somehow Defended by the First Amendment?
But they aren't victims until something is done to them. That's like saying you're going to prosecute me & penalize me years of my life for looking at a chick's ass whom I want to grab but haven't grabbed yet. Do you understand the nuance?
And yes, the ACLU defended those men's right to assemble. Read your constitution.
OK, but what about the reverse? Tracking perverts is utterly "harmless" until something is done to them, right?
And why would they have an Internet gallery of kids who probably didn't even know their likeness was being used, unless they planned to act on it?
I know there's a right to peaceably assemble, but there's also a question of intent. If you are "peacefully assembling" to fantasize of/plot kidnapping and rape, that shouldn't be protected, right?
Pedophilia and homosexuality are not the same "perversion." You sound like a fucking moron when you say this.
Homosexuality is something that people simply can't help. Homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone. If homosexuals get married, how the fuck is your life changed in ANY way? Think you'll get drunk and marry someone with the same genitals as you?
Look, go back to knowing only where you're not supposed to put your pee pee. Thinking clearly isn't your strong-suit.
No, again, they are NOT the same perversion, but both want "protection" and special exemptions from the rules.
Heaven forfend we all subscribe to a single set of moral, social, and legal guidelines!
If anything, I should be jealous. When do straight whites get "protected minority" status, and allowed to violate moral and legal taboos because of our skin-color rather than the amount of wealth we spend in court?
Yes, they were udder fools to invest in tits for such a boob, I can only hope they get nippled and dimed to death for exposing their role in her sudden outgrowth...
And all this because she refused to give the "Politically Correct" answer and pointed out that queers are against her religion...Way to violate the First Amendment--TWICE!
All kinds of perversion, are made public and protected, rather than kept quiet and scorned.
In this case, queer marriages. In an era of AIDS, and in a state that seems to be trying to be the most liberal and the most conservative at once, she spoke her upbringing instead of the Moral Relativist line, and lost to a less pretty woman, who was tossed a real marshmallow of a question.
The boob-job indicates she was setup to win, the question indicates someone wanted her to lose.
Oh? Okay. So in your own world think that gays getting maried indicates "bad behavior". Christains needs to fix their bad bahavior of divorce, infidelity, etc.
AIDS = gay people? next you're gonna tell me that AIDS virus got started by some african man fucking a monkey. AIDS dosn't discriminate.
Her upbringing? BULLSHIT! nobody cares about her upbringing. All beauty pageants are bullshit and so is her. Bringing morals in beauty pageant is like saying bringing world peace in KKK gig.
I wasn't sure about my procedure but I got some good info on plasticsurgerymadeeasy (.) com
tiresome79 1 year ago
OF COURSE THEY PAID FOR A BOOB JOB!!! It's beauty pageant, and if the blond next to her has bigger boobs than her then maybe I pick her over Carrie. It's a no brainer.
gj804 1 year ago
They can't show it here but if you want to see her nude they have pictures on XXXCelebrityVideos(dot)net
jluv2show4camd 1 year ago
i always viewed "Beauty Competitions" as Slut Contests anyway
dannypfan007 2 years ago
Watch the real Carrie Prejean sex tape here carrieprejeanslut. com
brad67941 2 years ago
Give her fake boobs back?
No way! They've now become part of the "temple of God" - giving sanctuary to everybody.
arianariadne 2 years ago
Hi, It's Me, Secretia Collins...
She better return them. I helped fill 'em up with sawdust, beans and Orville Reddenbocker's microwave popping corn. TFLMMYD!
SecretiaTV 1 year ago
carrie don't give your fake tah tah's back because you well be so flat chested everyone will think you're a little gay boy then again maybe you are, maybe you've had a total sex change you do look a little Man'ish
sammy7819 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Catch Carrie Prejeans exclusive sex tape at finestfreaks,com an outlet site to the original..sign up search her name and enjoy..pretty good flick actually ; )
thegreatali13 2 years ago
hey nice.. Btw if you like boys go to GayBangz[D ot) com for tons of them !
GayBraandy88 2 years ago
It's worth saying again: She needs to marry an evangelist; build a crystal church and slap crippled people around making them believe they're healed. This woman was born to work with her hands.
frankinbolton 2 years ago 9
She's not going to return her boobs, she's gonna have them rumped by every single guy in the world...
jarjarbanksss 2 years ago
What a stupid bimbo. I can't wait to beat off to this hypocrites sex tape.
A blonde, rich, conservative, christian girl is never going to know discrimination in this country. Just because people responded in a loud way to her bigoted views, that doesn't mean her rights are being taken away.
And I really can't stand the way she keeps congratulating and complimenting herself on being so brave and courageous blah blah blah...
PapaMagnum 2 years ago 15
Glad she still pisses the left off. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
phantastickyle 2 years ago
4chan is up. Who cares about /b/
brandonmc1994 2 years ago
It is important that the nigger not breed with the human.
Niggers mixing with whites will cause a 7 IQ decrease in the white score, and a 10 IQ point decrease in the Asian score.
It is better that niggers marry each other, or other lowly creatures like Hispanics, Native Americans, etc.
brandonmc1994 2 years ago
Basically, giving privileges to any abnormal group means giving special privileges to them all, due to a concept called "precedent". Namely, if we give Pervert Group A any special privileges or concessions, then Pervert Group B will demand them too, and C, and so on, each group, using the group(s) before it to crowbar the law open a little wider...
After all, if you can defend queers changing the definition of marriage, how can you refuse bigamists, for instance? Or pedos? Where is the line?
EPGAH 2 years ago
WTF!? abnormal? what is abnormal? 12% of the population is gay, always has been, thats the norm. There are gay people. Marriage is a right. If it is a priviedge, they can take it away. I don't know of anyone, not even convicted murderers who aren't given the "priviledge" to marry. And who are you to say what gay people do is "perversion"? This is why you don't understand the issue. You smear all facts with your bigotry. You see the world through a very narrow lense my friend.
Madjacker08 2 years ago
No, 1.2% of the population is gay. If it were 12%, there would be more dog groomers than demand could ever meet.
brandonmc1994 2 years ago 2
If it always has been, then why the sudden push now to get married? Why wasn't it an issue before? What caused them to come out of the closet en-masse?
As to tax-paying, yes, but they're trying to CHANGE the law, that's the whole issue, isn't it?
And Brandonmc, maybe you haven't seen the results of No Child Left Behind, but that's another sidetrack, isn't it?
And saaweeet, it's not about anal sex, it's about two entities of the same sex, rather than different ones, as the definition says.
EPGAH 2 years ago
"If it always has been, then why the sudden push now to get married?"
Oh I don't know. I am sure alot of people in Alabama said the same thing to african americans when they wanted equal rights in the 50s. People are more and more comfortable to come out of the closet, and they want to live just like everyone else.
Madjacker08 2 years ago
Now you're going in circles: They DON'T want to LIVE like everyone else, they just want the PRIVILEGES of the normal people.
And this time, YOU are getting it confused with race. I will point out there are minority neighborhoods where whites don't go unless they REALLY want to die, and various minority pride groups that are allowed and even encouraged, but White Pride is somehow considered evil...How does that work?
If someone had a Straight Pride parade, would that be bigoted discrimination?
EPGAH 2 years ago
lol aww poor skinhead is mad that his movement is looked down upon.
qualityrkc 2 years ago 2
I'm not a skinhead, I'm just against people trying to get the advantages of the rules, yet want to be ALLOWED to break them!
EPGAH 2 years ago
As to minorities, that plays into MY argument, not yours, they want to be TREATED equally, but not ACT equally. Look up the Uhuru Movement or the NAACP's various boners for proof.
Or the double-standard of the use of, "Nigger" (And variants)
Or how enforcing our immigration laws and our flag/language are considered racist, just because the majority of the invaders HAPPEN to be Hispanics?
Again, we're allowing the tail to wag the dog, the minority to control the majority through complaints!
EPGAH 2 years ago
per⋅verse
adjective
1. willfully determined or disposed to go counter to what is expected or desired; contrary.
2. characterized by or proceeding from such a determination or disposition: a perverse mood.
3. wayward or cantankerous.
4. persistent or obstinate in what is wrong.
5. turned away from or rejecting what is right, good, or proper; wicked or corrupt.
Pick one, and see if it applies...In fact, #1 applies best, I think.
And do you really think it's a GOOD thing that felons marry?
EPGAH 2 years ago
#1 can fit so many things that aren't perverted. It is desired to not be overweight. If I am, does that make obesity perverted? I think you lean more to try to file it under #4. But then, it becomes opinion, and not fact. pedofilia is illegal, it is wrong, it fits all very well. I would call pedophilia perverted, not homosexuality.
Madjacker08 2 years ago
And as to your question about murderers being allowed to marry. Do I think it's good? No... I don't think it's bad either. I think It's 2 adults, doing something legal. I may not agree with it, but well, thats my opinion.
Madjacker08 2 years ago
These "perverts" are 2 consenting, tax paying, law abiding adults. You are not holier than thou to sling mud around.
Madjacker08 2 years ago
I guess I am just bigotted against bigotry then. Just remember one thing. This is the year 2009. Since "men" was defined as white landowning males, things have changed alot. Rights have been extended to women, native americans, african americans, all ethnicities. Homosexual couples should be allowed the same rights any heterosexual couples get. ( Insurance, visitations and "say-so" in the hospitals, retirement benifits, etc..) How does their personal business effect you personally?
Madjacker08 2 years ago
Ah, so the fight is about the PERKS of marriage, not the marriage itself?
Now it makes sense...But again, marriage is a PRIVILEGE, not a right.
Why should we reward one perversion, and punish others? How low do you want to set the bar?
And as to your rights bullshit, hell ACORN let illegals and felons vote, if you want to look it up!
EPGAH 2 years ago
They shouldn't care about my opinion, and the law shouldn't care about theirs...They know what they have to do to get married legally, and they want what they want, so it's an impasse.
EPGAH 2 years ago
You keep saying "definition of marriage". Did you know, gay marriage is defined under marriage in the webster dictionary? They also define bigot as "a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group with hatred and intolerance." You sound like one to me. Just saying. Have a nice day.
Madjacker08 2 years ago
And you're devoted to your opinions too, and by calling me a bigot, you are exposing yourself as one!
Again, the queers want to have their cake and eat it too, and you can't have it both ways.
Cliche, but accurate.
EPGAH 2 years ago
Yes, queer marriage IS part of the definition of marriage:
4. a relationship in which two people have pledged themselves to each other in the manner of a husband and wife, without legal sanction: trial marriage; homosexual marriage.
Please note the bit about WITHOUT LEGAL SANCTION!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Comment removed
Madjacker08 2 years ago
Hey, if queers don't care about the public's opinion, why do they care so much about getting married?
All they're doing is asking the State, or some proxy thereof, to Bless their union!
Thereby rubbing the nose of the State or some proxy thereof in their "difference"
EPGAH 2 years ago
Of course you don't see it as bigotted, but it is. Just like the justice of the peace who wouldn't marry the interacial couple, but said he wasn't a racist. You may not see it as such, but it indeed is.
Madjacker08 2 years ago
man, this EPGAH guy is sure an angry biggot. I am sure you will be found with a wide stance, tapping your foot in some seethy bathroom...
Madjacker08 2 years ago
Nothing bigoted about it, genius, just that they want to be commended for the bravery of breaking our taboos, but there are some taboos that shouldn't be broken--and once broken, they should take the consequences.
But seriously, why are we being sidetracked with queers, when there's the border, taxing outsourcing, or finding what nutritional deficit is causing our womenfolk NOT to grow breasts, that would benefit EVERYONE!
Also, did you mean SEEDY?
EPGAH 2 years ago
I guess if I don't BEND OVER for public opinion, rather than take a stand, I'm a bigot, huh?
EPGAH 2 years ago
If you believe paying taxes exempts you from legal and social strictures of our society, try public urination, indecent exposure, or solicitation!
(Ironic side-note: Local queers got an anti-prostitution law removed, because it made it illegal to publicly solicit for anal sex--they didn't notice it was under the "prostitution" section. Now prostitutes can be arrested for being prostitutes, rather than based on which acts they specialize in! HA!)
EPGAH 2 years ago
I'm not acting out, and just because you pay taxes does not give you any immunity to existing laws...
If you act different, you will be treated different. And the more obvious you make your "different", the more severe the repercussions. Something about the limbic system, humans and other predators can subconsciously and immediately target the one that's different.
EPGAH 2 years ago
I abruptly realize my Logic professor's old saying, "You can't prove a negative".
So what reasons are FOR allowing queer marriages?
Is it the tax discount?
You can't argue the "natural" bit, I rebutted that already a few pages back.
Assuming America is still a representative republic, why should a MINORITY be allowed to dictate rules for the majority? Will-to-power through "victimhood"?
Also, what CAUSES queers? If not choice, then genetic or psychological malady? Where's the research into cure?
EPGAH 2 years ago
1.) 'Cause it's disgusting, although that is subjective.
2.) They're asking for EXTRA rights, not EQUAL rights.
If you want to be married, marry an opposite gender, 'cause that's the definition. If you want to live with a man, go ahead, but that's not marriage.
3.) You're essentially asking the State to declare "OK" something that most find disgusting
4.) Note that heteros that get beatdown are "assault", but queers that get beat are a hate crime. Do muggers ASK orientation first?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Ok, you misconstrued the pet thing, I guess?
Again, Marriage is defined as man and woman. Queers want marriage, but they want it between man and man, which isn't marriage, then, is it?
Anal is something completely different, and again, I don't care what they do as long as they keep it concealed.
Much as most people don't care to see people fucking in public or acting as if anything but the bathroom is the bathroom, right?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Ok, but next, why do queers not only want marriage, in violation of the definition, but treat it as a "right"? It's something that is licensed, so therefore, it becomes a privilege, like driving, owning a pet, etc.
They can live together, without being married. And additionally, there's a financial reason to disallow marriage: Married people pay slightly less taxes UNDER MOST CIRCUMSTANCES, than two singles.
EPGAH 2 years ago
Of course you don't get to complain what Obama does, if you do, you're a Horrible Racist...
And I've been called a "bigot" for being against queers marrying EACH OTHER...
And for wanting our borders secured, but I digress.
EPGAH 2 years ago
Who said anything about Christianity? Marriage is a LEGAL concept.
And that's very nice, Obama lets others do his mudslinging so he can maintain plausible deniability.
Interracial is not part of the definition. It says man and woman. Get your dictionary if you don't believe me. Online dictionary sites are as CLOSE as the Internet comes to politically neutral, but some still don't trust them.
EPGAH 2 years ago
Obama is only tangentially related to this, in that he's a nutcase who wants "equal" treatment, except for the bad parts. Bush got called a monkey constantly, Obama was pissed when a political cartoon IMPLIED he was a monkey.
Queers want "equal" treatment, EXCEPT for violating the spirit and definition of the word marriage as I posted earlier. They COULD marry, but that would be bisexuality and/or a huge lie...
EPGAH 2 years ago
EPGAH, you do realize that marrying outside your race was once taboo right? Even today there is a guy who won't to interracial marriages. Times change and I'd like for you to say how the world would end if gays got married. Besides its none of you or government's business to tell people how to live. I thought you conservatives were all for that.
AmericanNohbuddy 2 years ago
Tehantliberal brought up Obama, and since then, it because a second topic in the same thread.
As to "You're either with us or against us", that was a Bible paraphrase, but we OFFERED other countries to come with, and SOME did at first, but they dropped out, and then bitched that America was doing things unilaterally. If you're not part of the solution, you don't get to complain that America's doing it alone...
EPGAH 2 years ago
Well, although it's a bit off-topic, SAYING is not DOING, and Obama more or less sold us out by bailing out the corporations...The idea of deregulation was to let the incompetent fail, and the good succeed, right?
As to foreign policy, we asked others to help us spank Hussein, but one-by-one, they dropped out. France went the extra step of SELLING WEAPONS to the terrorists!
If we interfere, people bitch that we're imperialist; if we don't interfere, people bitch that we don't care!
Lose-lose!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Here's a tip: If you need a boob-job, or lipo to win a beauty contest, YOU ARE NOT BEAUTIFUL.
aquaknot 2 years ago
True, but fakery IS a multi-billion-dollar business from Cover Girl and Revlon (And their spokesbimbos) on up to Dow-Corning.
If makeup weren't profitable, they'd quit devoting counter-space to it, and presumably same with implants!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Yes, saaweeet, but remember, they didn't ask her a marshmallow question about world peace, kittens, puppies and Disney birdies, they asked her if queers should be allowed to marry.
And Obama is getting an award for doing nothing, plus, he's pulling more boners than Bush, but if anyone calls him on it, it MUST be because he's black, not because he's incompetent, right?
Also note the hypocrisy when one side wants free expression, but calls the other side a "meanie" for expressing THEMselves?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Wait a mintue, if she got a boob job doesn't that mean she isn't happy with the way god made her? Also, what does the bible say about estravegence (buying new boobs), lust (posing nude), despair (not happy with her body), pride (the beauty pageant is as prideful as they come), vainglory (she keeps saying she is a messiah of god), how many of the seven deadly sins has she broken? 5/7 -_-... she is so going to heaven.
I'm on a role, first I proved Jesus was a socialist now this.
Chimera1591 2 years ago 3
Great points.... its comical when you see it hey....
WWJD now there is plastic surgery? Maybe get his nose done or something?
stuartjamesgemmell 2 years ago
Read the bible CAREFULLY, for every "Thou shalt not" there is a waiver for anyone who named Prejean...
She is going to heaven, conservative heaven equals = Foxnews.
xdir 2 years ago
Where did she pose nude?
But yes, these pageants are outdated...and there are underage girl pageants...SQUICK!
EPGAH 2 years ago
It was topless actually, and you don't have to look to far to find one. Check out the pic @ 2:18, that star is not part of the photoshoot, it's a censor.
Chimera1591 2 years ago
That pic must've been taken with the wrong lens, in that pic she looks like the Chairwoman of the Itty Bitty Titty Committee!
EPGAH 2 years ago
For once, Cenk conquers his inner Pervy Wanker-- kudos! It's well past time for us to end these pageants and move into the 21st century.
shadetreader 2 years ago
Anna Please put up and Auction for Dinner and A Movie Date So I can win it and Be the Happiest Guy on EARTH!!! LOL. I Luv You Anna, So Amazingly Beautiful! Have I flattered you to death yet hahaha!
DC5boiThung 2 years ago
You might want to learn how to spell her name. Ana not Anna, you know, just incase you buy her flowers and you want to send her a card.
Chimera1591 2 years ago
I really hope Carrie Prejean fades into the ether.
TheDuckofLaw 2 years ago
Ana is so much sexier than that dumb hate-mongering bimbo Carrie Prejean HANDS DOWN.
antifaith82 2 years ago 6
yet another example of the cruelty and oppression of christianity in obamas america, she first lost the contest because she stood up for god, she then had to sue because she was constantly insulted and harrassed for her faith in christ, and now their trying to take everything they can away from her. when christ returns hel look at what the liberals have done with utter disgust and disdain.
tehant1liberal 2 years ago
About time christians get a taste of the cruelty and oppression they have dealt out for thousands of years...the disgust jeebus would feel would be directed at you fake ass religious zealots
kkamp2007 2 years ago
tehant1liberal.you wouldn't know christian persecution if it fell on top of you. she is no more a martyr anymore then you are intelligent. she is an opportunistic bimbo, for herself
MrRockythesquirrel 2 years ago 5
you don't know shit
bigboss686 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrRockythesquirrel 2 years ago
More than likely a description of yourself without the hot part lol
Typical of the left, claim lies and slander takes place against them when they are in fact the ones guilty of perpetrating twice as much the other way, slowly, day by day. The left is getting found out for what it really is, fascism on the march
bigboss686 2 years ago
lol - this ho desecrates her body, and if she ever has a baby will not be able to feed it. i doubt she will ever be a mother, she is too obsessed and in love with herself.
who told U Obama had anything to do with it, satan??
billydu2u 2 years ago
ahhahhhahahhahhha
pfranks44 2 years ago
a christian girl who got breast implants. a girl who posed in sexually provocative poses. true christian values
MrRockythesquirrel 2 years ago 3
but will he touch her boobs?
hentia2 2 years ago
ana's look perfect.
westaux999 2 years ago 6
I'm here for Jesus, god everything good, natural and holy, that's why I'm not returning the money for my unnatural tit job, that if god wanted me to have I would have been born with, (Leviticus 19:28), but it's okay for me because I'm white, and we can pick and choose what we want from the bible, like no homos or Mexicans.
oscarthegrump 2 years ago
If I had a choice for a girl to get a boob job or ass job, i'd tell her to get a nice round ass :)
ampdgmr 2 years ago 2
3 of those pictures aren't even her!! Please!!!!!
seventhstar 2 years ago
Natural boobs > Fake boobs if I'm able to try them out.
Of course, when it comes to masturbation only, there is no difference between them.
Ceivana 2 years ago 3
TMI dude
lilsparky97 2 years ago
I wonder how many guys agree with me on this one, but..I find natural boobs much much more attractive than fake ones.
Most of the time they are so obviously fake that it takes all the hotness away.
I take natural over fake anyday.
wtfisditvoorbullshit 2 years ago
i disagree. in a perfect world everyone would have a great set of naturals, but lots of girls arent blessed with great tits. fake tits are fine as long as they don't get carried away. a friend once told me fake tits are like mcdonalds french fries.......they may not be 100% real but there still damn good.
but you know who doesnt need a boob job? anna
greenergrass4130 2 years ago 2
Maybe in some cases it would be an improvement, yes. But that girl has to be totally flatchested or something. But that's just my opinion.
And, yeah, Anna is blessed.
wtfisditvoorbullshit 2 years ago
Isn't getting a boob job before a beauty contest kindof like an athlete taking steroids before a big game? How is it different?
111hcr32111 2 years ago 5
I agree with Cenk...as soon as I heard that they paid her to go under the knife....thats insane....its ovah
markvanslam 2 years ago 3
Ana has the best boobs. And her's are natural!
MrXxlarryxx 2 years ago 5
Is this ugly photo of that ape woman taken before her extreme make over?
FyFhFr25 2 years ago
Wow, Carrie's ruining it for all the future Miss Californias who want free boob jobs.
MaryJesusJoseph 2 years ago
I hate boob jobs, nice boobs are what makes them so special, not evryone can have them. And when models get them, they look goofy, big tits on bones eww!
mackandcheezy 2 years ago 2
Agreed.
odannyboy000 2 years ago
True, big fake tits devalue the real ones, kind of like how making your own money makes REAL money less valuable...or hell, the Fed Reserve printing more money makes money less valuable too!
But no, she's not hatemongering, she's standing up for what she believes, and if the queers can stand up for their "freedom of expression", why can't a dumb bimbo?
BTW, where did she pose nude? I will need to...confiscate the images!
EPGAH 2 years ago
it kinda defies the point of the pagent.
AllyKaht 2 years ago
Well, while it's fishy that the Miss USA Pageant organization paid for her implants, I didn't see them X-Raying all the boobs looking for artificial ingredients, so it's kinda unfair to single HER out!
EPGAH 2 years ago
I was just pervy wankering Ana's boobs the whole time.
pstchaseki 2 years ago 3
ana is hotter than prejean! even if you don't count ana's brains, prejean has this artificial barbie look that makes her look more like an inflatable doll than a woman
manonthemount 2 years ago 3
Yes, that's why my friend suggested a pageant with CyberDolls instead of humans...Or take it one step further, put a variety of wigs and breast implants from handheld to paperweight to table-breakers, and have the judges pick the combo that seems most pleasing to them...
EPGAH 2 years ago
I don't like government spending, but government spending on boob jobs is fine with me. It makes women more fuckable. It makes them look better. Jesus Christ advocated boob jobs to make birds hotter. We should not spend any money on health care. We need to spend more money on boob jobs to make women better, to make them more attractive, to make them more fuckable.
All tax money must fight breast cancer and pay for boob jobs.
I titfuck girls 6 nights a week. On my yacht. You are poor.
HomleandSecurity 2 years ago
Hell, just cutting welfare alone would free up enough money for your pet project, Homeland Security.
AIDS USED to be just a homosexual disease, but denial that it WAS a new disease and tardy banning of infected blood from blood-banks made it EVERYONE'S problem. Oh, and people who were straight in public, queer in private(s) helped make AIDS a crossover success!
Actually, I subscribe to the theory that it was artitficially created, although to what end, I'm still...conflicted.
EPGAH 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
AIDS is gay only.
HomleandSecurity 2 years ago
And negroes.
MisterMisanthrope 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
don't feed the troll
manonthemount 2 years ago
Nah bitch, feed the troll. It's the Interweb, it isn't real.
HomleandSecurity 2 years ago
We need to elect Jesus Christ President in 2012.
HomleandSecurity 2 years ago
Young Turks would be far better if it was just the lovely lady doing the show, just to watch her is exciting to me, she won't have to talk, she can just sit there , maybe show some lots of top skin as she is doing in this video. I admit, I did not realize in other videos she is that big breasted, I figured her to be a 'C'
klegster 2 years ago
As someone else said, she's dieting which reduced her breasts, but suddenly they made a comeback, which leads me to suspect artitficial "help"....Sadly, unless she goes up for a Pageant, the world may never know!
EPGAH 2 years ago
We both are talking about Ana right? I know I was.
klegster 2 years ago
Yes, Ana is dieting, which made her breasts shrink, but suddenly, they're back, which makes me suspect fakery
EPGAH 2 years ago
fake, real - doesn't matter. What matters is whether you can bust a nut on that chest and shoot some into the face. I'd hit it and quit it, since that's what Jesus teaches in the Bible. Titty fuck the white girl and move on. Hit it and quit it, turn the other cheek, same meaning. Jesus was about getting BJs and titfucks. Especially from married broads. Get out there and fuck more. if they say no, you put a gun to their head. Get the pussy you own. All men own all pussy.
HomleandSecurity 2 years ago
Comment removed
APR301789MAR41797 2 years ago 2
Yes, and prettier and probably smarter.
klegster 2 years ago
Filling your boobs with saline to enhance your appearance and make yourself more attractive to the opposite sex is definitely the Christian thing to do.
It's in the Bible.
Matthew 6:17
" And God said go forth with large hooters and flaunt before man."
jessie74 2 years ago
Actually, Isaiah 66:11 is more in favor of natural breasts:
"That ye may suck, and be satisfied with the breasts of her consolations; that ye may milk out, and be delighted with the abundance of her glory."
See? We should milk these puns for all they're worth, it's in the Bible!
EPGAH 2 years ago
"We should milk these puns for all they're worth"
LMFAO!!!!
jessie74 2 years ago
Song of Solomon is more in favor of large breasts:
Thy two breasts are like two young deer that are twins.
Breasts the size of deer? Brings new meaning to trophy(-wife) hunting!
EPGAH 2 years ago
LOL
jessie74 2 years ago
You know your pageant is owned by Donald Trump when they pay for your boob job!!!
redrocker1055 2 years ago
Ana looks ten times better than Carrie Prejean
GLJonStewart66 2 years ago
Anna!!
hyugakarn 2 years ago
how progressive is progressive insurance? Also Carrie Prejean's beauty is only skin deep.
GLJonStewart66 2 years ago
Ana doesn't need fake tits, that stuff is au'naturel' right there. My God.
TheFortressMaximus 2 years ago
Carrie Prejean has nothing on Ana...
leemailme 2 years ago
Damn!!! Look at Ana. I didn't know she had such a tremendous rack.
SchumiPython 2 years ago
Ana has a nice set of boobs herself
Useyno 2 years ago
And if you discovered Ana's tits were fake, would you have the same Righteous Indignation and demand SHE be fired immediately, if not sooner?
This is all about different groups held to different--sometimes contradictory--standards!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Strawman argument. This isn't about Ana or her exquisite, luscious bosom (*drools*). Not only that, Ana wasn't in a fucking pageant. Nor does she work for the company that HELD the pageant.
This is about Prejean's tits & the fact that she wasn't fulfilling her contractual expectations as an employee of that company. The augmentation was conditional to her doing the job. When she void the contract, she voided the accessory benefits of the job (ie her saline sacs). Try again mate.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Actually, Ana looks rackilicious in this vid, but in udders--er--OTHERS, she looks almost as flat-chested as one of Michael Jackson's victims!
And another thing, why DID they give her the implants if they weren't subtly pushing her as the winner?
EPGAH 2 years ago
You're nuts, Ana has some tig ol' bitties. But she's slimming down so her adipose tissue is an anatomical victim. I must say though, your infatuation with NAMBLA & MJ's alleged victims speaks volumes. I think maybe you should talk to someone.
Irrespective, the implants may or may not have been part of the "push" but it doesn't make sense. I say that because everyone in the pageant works for the same company. It's not like NBA squads battling. This is like an intra-team scrimmage.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
I know, sadly, the Itty Bitty Titty Committee is taking over TV as well as reality...*Plays dirge on violin*
It doesn't make sense that they'd give them to her and then demand them back afterward--especially WITHOUT A CONTRACT! Are they going to sell them on E-Bay, or what?
And actually, I used to volunteer to work with and protect abused kids, so I'm a little more sensitive to the topic than most...
EPGAH 2 years ago
They didn't demand the titties back. They demanded that she pay for them because she breached her contract. Again, you're making the assumption that it's a competition for independent parties. No, this is basically an LLC, with employees in every state, territory, commonwealth & plantation, that held a pageant. One the reqs for those employees was that they make appearances. The boob job may have been a benefit just like Rockies tickets were a benefit at my old job. Understand?
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Yes, but if you don't still have that job, were you expected to pay back for the tickets?
This feels like she's being punished for losing.
If you give someone a GIFT, there's no expectition of give-backs. If it was a LOAN, there should have been some documentition.
Not that it would've helped much, because even prenups and wills are no longer absolute.
Did you look up ANS as I suggested a couple pages ago? She didn't have to give back any of her gifts--and worse demanded MORE from the estate
EPGAH 2 years ago
No. I just don't get to keep getting discounted tickets. And since I fulfilled that job's reqs during my tenure there, everything kosher.
She's not being punished for losing. Win or lose doesn't matter. She had an appearance circuit to which she's expected to tend. When she doesn't, she voids her own contract & the benefits in it. Why are you missing that?
upabittoolate 2 years ago
THAT part I didn't know, I thought once she lost, they would sneer at her in disgust, "You lost; GET lost!"
EPGAH 2 years ago
But why would they WANT to control the life×, let alone appearances, of someone who lost because she couldn't keep her mouth shut and parrot cotton-candy lies?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Was her contract to WIN, or just to work?
EPGAH 2 years ago
It doesn't matter if her contract was to win or work. What's paramount here is that she DIDN'T WORK. She didn't scheduled appearances. Instead she popped up on the "Today Show" & "Hannity". She breached the contract, she pays for the boobs they bought her. Understand?
upabittoolate 2 years ago
What hypocrisy.
jotunobsidianeyes 2 years ago
Is that the same chick who was against gays?
MLadyAzzera 2 years ago
Yes, it is.
JonahDavids 2 years ago
I am on Carrie's side here. I think there is something intrinsically wrong with a beauty pagent paying for boob jobs! What about promoting natural curves, or not. They can whistle for their money.
Cutchswife 2 years ago
How is that being on her side?She agreed to have the boo job done.
javy150 2 years ago
speaking of boobs, nice shirt Anna ;)
bcourter82 2 years ago 3
Every time I think that, I look down at the comments and within 4 or 5 someone already said it =)
gellerstudent 2 years ago
Speak for yourself Cenk. The Miss Hawaiian Tropic Pagent is awesome!
Vernonu9 2 years ago 3
So they told her to get a boob job? I thought she got one on her own. Makes me think of her slightly different.
LoryLandskipper 2 years ago
They didn't TELL her to get a boob-job, they PAID for it!
Also, she was against queer marriage, right?
Why wasn't she asked an easier question, like the other bimbo who actually won?
And for that matter, why are so many perversions, from queers to pedophiles, becoming protected minorities, rather than keeping perversion SECRET, so that others don't know about it, and thus, can't down them for it?
She got a boob job and got screwed, and not in the fun way...
EPGAH 2 years ago
That's a nifty rhetorical trick you just pulled. You took pedophilia (which is illegal in this country), homosexuality (which is very legal among consenting parties) & race identified groups (which is comprised of minorities who can't control who their parents are) and wrapped them all into a neat little package so you point your shotgun-style critique at them.
That trick was neat but ultimately is was ineffective. Google the word "nuance" & tell me what you come up with.
upabittoolate 2 years ago 2
Nuance is minor subtle differences.
But as to nuance, you're right, there ARE minor subtle differences.
Queers claim persecution for their perversion, BUT they wave it in everyone's face. If they concealed it, it would be a non-issue.
NAMBLA is winning court-cases by basically watching what the queers do and repeating it, claiming persecution for their perversion.
SOME members of other "minorities" claim our restrictions should not apply to them, because of their skin/"culture"/whatever.
EPGAH 2 years ago
Again, you've made a very cunning error. Subtle & minor are not the same thing. In fact, subtle, while small, is what distinguishes things. But I see what your issue is. You're a Bill O'Reiily type of logician.
I'd like you to show me a case that NAMBLA has won. Also, show me where they've used homosexuality to justify sex with underage boys THEN applied it to the court case.
Again, you can't put all minorities under the same umbrella. Why? Because it lacks the richness of nuance.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Curley v. NAMBLA was a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in 2000, by Barbara and Robert Curley against the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA).
Hell, the very EXISTENCE of NAMBLA and the Black Orchid Club indicate some exemption from the law.
Why should certain groups get to ignore rules they find inconvenient--and yet turn around and expect protection of the "right" to ignore the rules?
EPGAH 2 years ago
I figured you'd say the Curley case. But you're cherry picking in addition to misreading the precedent. For 1, if it were an actual molestation case, the State would be the plaintiff. Also, NAMBLA only victory is that they are allowed to exist. There's nothing in the ruling that allows them to "practice". In America, thoughts & desires aren't necessarily illegal. Actions, however, can be. Try again mate.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
Well, the ACLU has helped fend off angry parents when they had a gallery of kids on the Website, essentially a shopping-list of victims...
HOWEVER, an opposite site maintained by the State of California was forced to discontinue disseminating lists of sex-offenders...
So why are the perverts allowed to have THEIR free-speech, but not the State of California have a free site to keep tabs on them?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong, I don't support NAMBLA at all but I respect their right to be. In fact, it's a civil liberty endowed by the 1st Amendment. In that respect, the ACLU was correct. Also, unless the boys were molested, they crime to which they were victims was ogling. Again, you're using some extremely poor logic.
upabittoolate 2 years ago 2
I don't respect their right to have a victims gallery...And nowadays, you can get sued for sexual harassment just for ogling, let alone talking about Seinfeld Episodes.
But again, why is it a "violation of privacy" for the perverts to be tracked on the Internet, but perverts tracking kids is somehow Defended by the First Amendment?
EPGAH 2 years ago
But they aren't victims until something is done to them. That's like saying you're going to prosecute me & penalize me years of my life for looking at a chick's ass whom I want to grab but haven't grabbed yet. Do you understand the nuance?
And yes, the ACLU defended those men's right to assemble. Read your constitution.
upabittoolate 2 years ago
OK, but what about the reverse? Tracking perverts is utterly "harmless" until something is done to them, right?
And why would they have an Internet gallery of kids who probably didn't even know their likeness was being used, unless they planned to act on it?
I know there's a right to peaceably assemble, but there's also a question of intent. If you are "peacefully assembling" to fantasize of/plot kidnapping and rape, that shouldn't be protected, right?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Pedophilia and homosexuality are not the same "perversion." You sound like a fucking moron when you say this.
Homosexuality is something that people simply can't help. Homosexuality doesn't hurt anyone. If homosexuals get married, how the fuck is your life changed in ANY way? Think you'll get drunk and marry someone with the same genitals as you?
Look, go back to knowing only where you're not supposed to put your pee pee. Thinking clearly isn't your strong-suit.
LoryLandskipper 2 years ago
No, again, they are NOT the same perversion, but both want "protection" and special exemptions from the rules.
Heaven forfend we all subscribe to a single set of moral, social, and legal guidelines!
If anything, I should be jealous. When do straight whites get "protected minority" status, and allowed to violate moral and legal taboos because of our skin-color rather than the amount of wealth we spend in court?
EPGAH 2 years ago
what makes her any different looking then any other chick from Cali come on clones every where
DemonicGemini 2 years ago
Fuck all yall...I'm for Carrie! Fuck Homos and Fuck Cali!!!!
datniggami6 2 years ago
and fuck rednecks like you datniggami
MrRockythesquirrel 2 years ago
A redneck with a big ass black dick you cocksuckin faggot!
datniggami6 2 years ago
carrie prejean IS a boob job
MrRockythesquirrel 2 years ago 5
Yes, they were udder fools to invest in tits for such a boob, I can only hope they get nippled and dimed to death for exposing their role in her sudden outgrowth...
And all this because she refused to give the "Politically Correct" answer and pointed out that queers are against her religion...Way to violate the First Amendment--TWICE!
EPGAH 2 years ago
what about a well thought INTELLIGENT answer EPGAH! and stop drooling
MrRockythesquirrel 2 years ago
I am not drooling, in fact, I have a condition that my mouth doesn't generate ENOUGH saliva...
I'm not sure if the rest of your comment is agreement or sarcasm?
EPGAH 2 years ago
She may have the freedom of speech, but not Freedom from Consequences.
Voodooray007 2 years ago
Ok, but given that, why are there consequences for standing up against queer marriage?
Why is bad behavior protected, and speaking out against it is "bigoted" and punished?
EPGAH 2 years ago
"Why is bad behavior protected, and speaking out against it is "bigoted" and punished" - EPGAH
Define "Bad bad behavior protected"? this is gonna be a good answer to this.
Voodooray007 2 years ago
All kinds of perversion, are made public and protected, rather than kept quiet and scorned.
In this case, queer marriages. In an era of AIDS, and in a state that seems to be trying to be the most liberal and the most conservative at once, she spoke her upbringing instead of the Moral Relativist line, and lost to a less pretty woman, who was tossed a real marshmallow of a question.
The boob-job indicates she was setup to win, the question indicates someone wanted her to lose.
EPGAH 2 years ago
Oh? Okay. So in your own world think that gays getting maried indicates "bad behavior". Christains needs to fix their bad bahavior of divorce, infidelity, etc.
AIDS = gay people? next you're gonna tell me that AIDS virus got started by some african man fucking a monkey. AIDS dosn't discriminate.
Her upbringing? BULLSHIT! nobody cares about her upbringing. All beauty pageants are bullshit and so is her. Bringing morals in beauty pageant is like saying bringing world peace in KKK gig.
Voodooray007 2 years ago
There are only two types of people who pay for a woman's "enhancements"
A PIMP, who does it to generate more income for their investment
A SIMP, who does it because the woman wanted them to and they justify it by saying it helps her in life
Common sense. A normal person/group/whatever doesn't do such things like this.
strongpimphand 2 years ago