Added: 1 year ago
From: Skepgnostic
Views: 202,967
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,065)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • cont.. This is a cake answer - it can't be done in a minute - you either get the narrative or its lost! you may ask why God and why the prayer? The prayer is directed at God and there is feedback in the form i explained earlier.The same God also teaches the feeling can be resulted from the same prayer; he also teaches the quality of the feeling depends on the quality of the prayer; in the same why i have described. Call it mad or stupid but God pings back!

  • @606snakes God doesn't 'do' anything. Any diety, no matter which religion it is tied to, is a work of fiction. There is no logical evidence to prove the existence of a diety. And without proper evidence, no theory should be accepted by anyone.

    Having faith is, for lack of a better word, retarded. Believing in something with no evidence whatsoever... That sounds intelligent doesn't it?..

  • @blacktiger112 Skepgnostic did not get the gist of my argument, i did say theists can't prove God emperically - as far as the "established" scientific method is concerned. However, this is not because of incapacity but the method is inherently deficient becuase it's dependent on the senses. For example if what is being reviewed is exponentialy too large from your vantage point you can't see it but you may smel it taste it or feel it.The other attributes are also deficient on their own account...

  • The motivated reasoning of some of you is obvious. What emperical evidence do you require? a signal on a spectrum analyser or a litmus paper changing colour? or an X-ray of God? What makes you think this will be imperical enough and will not suffer from diverse interpretations just as "Dawkins" faith-heads do? My God has width and height exceeding trillions of miles how do i capture him on film for you to see? How do i even zoom out to see the dimensions?

  • @606snakes Did you even look up Russell's Teapot as Skepgnostic suggested?

  • @606snakes god cannot be proved or disproved, just as you cannot prove or disprove that i have an invisible pokemon companion :)

  • "The Council on Foreign Relations is the American branch of a society which originated in England (RIIA) ... [and] ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established." Dr. Carroll Quigley

  • Religion is like a penis... in the sense that:

    - It's OK to have one.

    - It's OK to be proud of it.

    - It's OK to think yours is better than others'.

    - It's OK to discuss it with others who do not take offense by it.

    However...

    - You don't wave it around in public.

    - You don't expose children to it, other than teachning about it in school.

    - And if you try to shove it down my throat by saying "Worship this or you're damned!!"... don't expect me to be happy.

  • @mkarnerfors Lol, good one.

  • @mkarnerfors LMFAO classic, best I've seen yet.

  • what was wrong with what he said before he apologized? (Seriously, I missed it)

  • You can't say he's tactful -- then again, the truth hurts...

  • Thank GOD for Christopher Hitchens LOL

  • @flutophilus: Good point, but i dont see theists trying to prove their God exists on this forum it's the atheists who are vociforous God does not exist.The different gods you have cited are either avatars of god or various names that ascribe God. I have reasons to believe God is one otherwise there would be noticable acrimony amongs them.Having said that, i'ts quite possible to proof a God exists, though he has chosen to be physically hidden, through a forensic examination of the universe.

  • 'hah.well.um what an incredibly stupid question.'

    Christopher- R.E.S.P.E.C.T

  • OK @606snakes - prove that Thor does not exist, prove that Zeus does not exist, prove that Shiva does not exist, prove that Amadioha does not exist, prove that Amun-Ra does not exist, prove that ... do you get my point? There are hundreds of "gods". You clearly do not understand Russell's Teapot. His point is that it is up to the person making the claim for the existence of something to put forward the evidence for it's existence. It is not up to the rest of us to disprove it.

  • I wish I had the balls to say to someone's face that they just asked "an incredibly stupid question."

  • @Justwantahover: Fair point. I wouldn't argue with an agnostic but have a axe to grind with an atheist who propagates with science, becuase he would need to furnish his evidence as well God does not exist. "Russell's Teapot" applies here too. It's also more difficult to prove God does not exist as opposed to exit, becuase you have to check all space just like in the case of a missing person. In God's case, you must analyse the space where he is claimed to be and prove it does not constitute him.

  • @ms255: You pre-suppose religious people do nor question the veracity of their beliefs. It happens all the time so your "burned in your fu***ing retina is a figment of your imagination of what religious people are.

    Your argument regarding the probability of truth is valid. However, if we eliminate the possiblity of coincidence, coupled by the frequency of which the truth is repeated we are bound to accept the person as truthful. Do ever believe anyone? If yes why?

  • Allah (supposedly) saying something that just happens to be true is not proof of his divine wisdom in any way. For example, I could say this:

    "606snakes wouldn't know a logical fallacy if it was burned into his fucking retinas."

    I'm absolutely correct, but it doesn't make me a god, nor does it make me divinely wise.

  • @itsjustameme: Do you have proof jinns do not exist. You are at liberty to disbelieve. There is overwhelming anecdotal evidence of paranormal life that cannot simply be dismissed as folklore. Remember the Allah you jest over the sun, says life originated from water and the universe is expanding. i doubt you would not laugh at these would you?

  • Comment removed

  • @cosmosmonger said "he's in Hell now." Isn't it amazing how 4 little words like this can speak MOUNTAINS about a person's character? It's people like you, cosmosmonger, that make me so thankful to be an atheist. Sincerely.

  • @Skepgnostic stop bitching. Hitchens was an asshole who's responsible for moral anarchy and unconscionable dehumanization on a mass scale. I wonder how many babies suffered as an effect of his evil occult preaching.

  • @606snakes "Bacteria and viruses existed before scientists found out." Indeed. And now we have evidence that bacteria and viruses exist. The same thing can not be said of any god at this time. Atheists require "direct correlation" of a thing in order to KNOW it exists. I'm willing to bet that if we discovered "direct correlation" that a theists god existed, atheism would cease to exist (for the most part). ya see, theists aren't purposely trying to defy God--we need PROOF OF LIFE.

  • @606snakes

    As soon as you manage to find the same degree of proof of Allah as we have of germs I will be happy to acknowledge your comment and decide if he deserves my worship.

    Until then all I can do is laugh at you for failing to recognize that as it stands the notion of Allah as described in the Quran is in direct opposition with everything we know about how the universe works.

    Flying horses that take passengers to heaven, Jinns, and the sun going into murky ponds I cannot take seriously.

  • @606snakes You actually thought that made any sense?  Really, stop trying to think, I don't think you are qualified

  • @606snakes The Bible was once a scientific account of how we got here (and still is for half of us) but just like the microscope has advanced science, so has forensics. If somebody said that bacteria existed before the microscope was invented, they would have been wrong. Just like the creationists believe evolution is wrong. Creationists are like microbiologists without a microscope.

  • @606snakes You have that backwards. Rationality is not an atheist mindset, it's a religious need. All religions need rationalization, else all religions would fail.

  • @606snakes And before they were proven there was no reason to assume it was true. If its proven god exist, I will accept that fact. I will however - not believe. With your logic I have to believe everything before it is proven. Then - by default I have to believe two contradicting things at the same time. That is by definition irrational. I have to believe there are pink elephants on neptune. I have to believe there are no pink elephants on neptune at the same time. Your logic is garbage moron.

  • @606snakes circular argument in the extreme.. wow

  • @606snakes

    "ething only exists on the basis of available scientific evidence is fallacious. Bacteria and viruses existed before scientists found out..."~

    Interesting bit of circular logic.. but the discovery of bacteria followed a scientific rational examination... not some ding dong in a robe claiming authority because of a convenient dream he had.. one that has people listening to him for no other reason then he's insistent.. and he and his thugs have guns.

  • @606snakes You're an idiot.

  • @606snakes People did not believe in bacteria until they where discovered using science.

    You show me evidence of god and I’ll believe you.

  • @606snakes Your "case for god" is equally a case for unicorns, leprechauns, and shit we haven't even made up yet. We're just waiting for the evidence to prove there's a diamond up my ass the size of a baseball. But you can't call me a liar until you get your head up it.

  • @AMpufnstuf "and shit we haven't even made up yet"

    that made me giggle.

  • @606snakes The Bible says that Christ was crucified. The Quran says that Christ was not crucified. Is it rational to believe that Christ was crucified? Is it rational to believe that Christ was not crucified? If your idea of rationality can encompass two contradictory beliefs, why is being rational any better than being irrational?

  • @606snakes Atheists do not believe in the existence of god because there is no rational or scientific reason to. The bible and quran are not proof. They were written by people. Still, neither believer or nonbeliever can tell the other wether or not god exists.

    Atheism doesn't mean you believe in nothing. Atheists can believe in many things, such as democracy, freedom and justice.

  • @606snakes "What emperical proof is there God does not exist apart from the failure by theists to prove God empirically." This sentence hit me with more nonsensicality than I have ever been hit with before. 606Snakes: Look up "Russell's Teapot" to answer your ridiculous question.

  • @606snakes Oh you, go read some on experimental/scientific method. Lets call your claim, the existance of god, a theory. For a theory to be of any use whatsoever, you must be able to test the wether or not this theory holds any ground in reality, which is what atheism is all about. Reality. The claim of god is, due to its metaphysical nature, unable to be tested. "God" is proven by nothing but faith. Faith isn't evidence, and can't be falcified. Wish you realize the truth. Have a nice day

  • @606snakes To give you some perspective... The probability of a god existing is just the same as the probability that what's right under you at any given moment controls how the trees lean, and that it's purple and green when noone's looking. I've always wondered how a theist would respond to that so please respond to that. :)

  • @606snakes The burden of proof lies upon the claimers. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

  • @606snakes Prove to me unicorns doesn't exist. Prove to me that there isn't an all might man bear pig who fucks god in the ass with a huge black strap on every night! Oh wait you can't!

  • @606snakes You cant prove something doesnt exist. I think I just broke your entire argument.

  • @606snakes You say atheism requires faith until god is disproven, but then you can say, that people require faith that the world will not end at the 21/12/2012, or for that matter, you must have faith that money wont disappear out of you pocket, until you can prove its still there, the world does not actually work that way, and no you dont need faith to be a atheist, as there is no proof there is god, also you say there is proof God exist, please learn the difference between proof and evidence

  • @606snakes What empirical proof that a pink skinned, three horned, masturbating elephant doesn't exist in your pants? Mind you, this elephant is invisible, untouchable, omniscient, omnipresent, and lives outside the realm of reality. Now please, provide proof. Provide proof, or let everyone around you know that a pink skinned, three horned, masturbating elephant lives in your pants.

  • @606snakes You do not understand simple logic, therefore you cannot be logically argued with. It is physically impossible to disprove a negative, God is a figment of your imagination. It is a story passed on by wise men from thousands of years ago. These men thought it up to control the idiotic masses with moral values. Sadly their efforts failed, and in fact they've caused the most wars, murders and genocides than anything else in the history of mankind.

  • Cont..I have a rule of thumb to verify God.My brain picks HV oscillations from a out of sync TV circuit with utmost accuracy.The higher the oscillation the higher the discomfort.The same feeling can be generated by the prayer (salat) with utmost accuracy on a continum of comfort and serenity depending on how good it is.

  • @606snakes Utter. Bullshit. You add nothing to the debate, your opinion is invalid in this discussion. Try again.

  • Comment removed

  • theres some career going down the toilet.

  • @Claymatt52 *sigh* Now I know theists enjoy playing the "I'm the victim" card any chance they get, but your words (the parts that I can make out) are incorrect. He didn't "insult" anyone, he simply said that the question was incredibly stupid (which it was). And these curse words that you speak of...um...well...do you think "stupid" is a"curse word"? And I hear religious people use curse words all the time, they're not exclusive to the non-religious.BTW, your comma splices hurt my eyes

  • @Claymatt52 Isn't it strange that Athiests rarely are offended when they are told that they will burn in hell (essentially a baseless threat) or that they are morally evil or sinners or whatever, whereas Theists are constantly offended by athiests comments. Its probably because we Athiests are much more confident in our science, logic and fact than thiests are in their unproven faith.

  • @islayzombies1 It's also because Christians and Muslims (Jews do not believe in a Hell) WANT people that are not like them to burn in hell. Many of them do not even realize how sadistic they really are. This fear of hell is also a morally revealing concept on why many Theists act "good": they only act good TO AVOID eternal punishment, where "most" atheists who act good do so because they feel it is their duty (Deontology) as intelligent beings to respect others (with no reward).

  • @Skepgnostic Plus if you accept that your God would send anyone to a pit of fire for an eternity of punishment for any reason at all, let alone good, moral people whose only crime is not having worshipped him, then surely that God is the most evil being conceivable.

    I refuse to have anything to do with such a being.

  • I think I should memorise his speeches. I couldn't possibly come up with something better to tell my dim-witted catholic friends.

  • @przebieglabrukiew I have an android app called Brilliant Quotes and it´s full of famous and smart people. It contains Hitchens, Dawkins and Carlin as well as Churchill, Groucho Marx and Twain. My favorite app at the moment :)

  • How to patronise the Religious with Christopher Hitchens :) This is awesome :)

  • That question got just the right amount of respect it derserved. I actually thought Hitch went easy on him.

  • Wow, what an ass. This is the kind of thing that gives Atheists the overly aggressive, know-it-all stigma. He can't answer the question like a normal human being? What a shit-head.

  • @titans091052 thats how he is. its his personality

  • @titans091052 No intelligent person needs to answer a question like that. If you ask such a question it is a testament to your mental retardation (and I mean that sincerely). First off, Hitchens is not "taking away" anything from anybody. Second, REALITY does not require you to believe in it in order for it to exist. If someone said "I don't believe in oxygen You can't see it so it doesn't exist." That's fine. But oxygen doesn't require your faith to exist...only God does.

  • @Skepgnostic If you want to be an ass hole and try to make yourself feel superior then that's on you. If you want to explain things to these poor misguided people and actually try to improve the world then maybe you should try having manors.

  • @titans091052 Sorry but arent the religious people the ones that have the aggressive, know-it-all stigma? Arent YOU the one who claims to have all the answers and arent YOU the one that gets aggressive when someone says you have no authority to control them?

  • @clayton9m First of all, I am not a Christian (I used to be). Yes! There are plenty of Christians who are total fuck wads who claim absolute authority over people and use the Bible as an excuse for all of their behavior. That doesn't give you the right to be a jerk to someone who has a genuine misunderstanding. The guy in the video had a different view on morality than Hitchens, nothing else.

  • @titans091052 No, the guy in the video is saying "how dare you take away a person's credulity and demand that they think critically." In reality (and I've said this before) Hitchens isn't taking away anything from anyone. All he's saying it "suspend judgement and consider he possibility that you may be under a misapprehension." Its such bullshit that theist play their "I'm being oppressed" card all day long. You people are the ones "forcing" us not to think for ourselves.

  • @clayton9m @clayton9m No. Stop being so obtuse. Your team are the ones claiming to have all the answers. We (atheists), unfortunately, are limited to what we can "prove". Theists are limited to what they can "imagine".

  • @titans091052 This guy....claims that I have a superiority complex -- then calls atheists poor misguided people. And I don't know what you're talking about. Because I used the word "retarded"? its not intended to be offense, it's intended to be honest. Look up the word retarded; it mean's (slow). People like you are (slow) to think critically; hence: retarded. Not to be confused with those who are clinically mentally retarded.

  • @Skepgnostic cmon, you did use the insulting term. and rightfully so. religious fanatics are complete retards, and i mean it in the most insulting sense possible . :D

  • @titans091052 ok what about christians saying atheists should be thrown out of america and that they arent real citizens? its pretty hard not to be an ass when religious people have such retarded beliefs.

  • I miss Christopher. All religion is nonsense. For clarity see "Religious Fanatic debates Atheist" on my channel.

  • does that say nypl, as in nipple, upside down????

  • RIP to one of the most compelling orators the modern era has known

  • i'm a vegetarian but i defend abbatoirs

    fucking idiot

  • @timewilltell7 Depends on the Vegetarian. Maybe they're only a Vegetarian because they happen to like Vegetables, and not for any moral reasons.

  • @timewilltell7 Although, even if it were that case, there's no logical motivation to defend the abbatoirs anyways, so yes, he is a fucking idiot.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • It must be a good question, CH always belittles what he does not understand and cannot answer. in this case he was stalling from start to finish, so he gave a childish answer.

  • @MrFlatroofer He gave a childish answer because the inquisitors (e.g. the simpleton who queries Hitch) are feeble minded dullards who continue to ask THE SAME questions that he previously answered time and time again, therefore one can only presume that these individuals possess merely primitive cognitive capabilities and subsequently are only capable of understanding adolescent themes.

  • OWNED

  • Atheist defends religion? Poorly disguised fundy! I mean if religion suceeds and atheism fails, why be an atheist? Makes no sense at all.

  • @andromidius Because you don't choose what you believe. It's perfectly plausible that one could see a benefit of religion, and see a benefit of a belief in something supernatural, yet not be able to believe it themselves.

    One doesn't choose whether their athiest or theist.

  • LIKE / DISLIKE / WHERE'S THE LOVE IT BUTTON?

  • I don't think the guy asking question is even an atheist. I've never heard of "I'm an atheist but I defend religion"; that must be a new trend used by creationists to defend their argument, without even thinking that their lies are too obvious.

  • It was fair game but I can't help cringing at the thought of being so humiliated. 

  • Unlike religious people we atheists aren't preaching, but the religious people apparently can't see the difference between stating a fact and preaching (the latter expecting everyone to believe and if they don't let's hit them in the head)

  • "what an incredibly stupid question" HAHAHAH chris is da fuckin man

  • Hitchens was smart and articulate, but he didn't need to be such a cunt about it

  • @hayeder What are you talking about? I think Hitchens was very respectful.

  • How does the guy asking the question not see that he's making an argument ad populum?

  • Hear hear!!!

    Oh, n I live the phrase from @sjatox "Religion makes some people very rich (and I'd add powerful) and many people very dumb"!

  • @skepticoz

    You are spot on.

    Religion makes some people very rich, and many people very dumb.

  • If 95% of the population was on LSD and it gave them meaning and a purpose to live and blah blah blah does it make their delusions any more real and would it be right to say that the 5% of the population should be governed by the delusions of those on LSD? and that you should not become president if you are not on LSD? it is not a matter of which side has the most people on it, it is a matter of who is right, and that would be us.

  • @SolomonMayhem i know what your saying, but thats a horrible example, LSD is fucking great

  • @Yrhp8268

    Interesting.

    I believe it takes a truly pathological brand of stupidity to conclude, based on one's own ignorance, that a God, or Gods exist.

    Atheists simply have no good reason to accept there is one, three, or however many Gods your particular brand of religion states there are. If there were a good reason, there's be no need for faith and we'd all be cutting our son's foreskin off in praise.

  • Comment removed

  • The pathological narcissism is ALL YOURS, if you think a magical loving sky daddy constructed the universe to bountifully provide for a chosen flock of isolated individuals. Not only is it narcissistic in the most parochial way, but it is also divisive and contentious as your deity has created an ethical dilemma in the demand for faith; the failure to comply, punishable by eternal damnation & torture. Only brainless, cowardly sycophants can volunteer for that moral sellout of others.

  • The kind of person who thinks they could go to heaven and enjoy themselves, knowing that others, who´s only crime was credulity (and not groveling to the imaginary dictator of your disgusting mythical ideology) is utterly beneath contempt. If your story were true, there would STILL be no heaven for a decent person, but rather one hot hell and one cold hell. That grown people cant see this as barbaric emotional blackmail, sickens me to the gut. Now kindly FUCK OFF with your EVIL SHIT.

  • @zzzaaa09900 you're certainly one sick/dirty/inadequate wimp of a male ...as you continue to show

    so WHAT has caused you to be as backward/ignorant as you've exposed of yourself

    I still find it HILARIOUS that in 2012 any adult male would accept nonsense that islam teaches and you spewed about 'all humans are born muslim'LOL

    goodness me, such childish stupidity

    is 96.2 accurate LOL - yes or no

  • @zzzaaa09900 good plan. Ban cars ,everyone gets a Harley free from the state.

  • and he didn't even need to mention that way more than 5% of Americans are atheists.

  • BOOM!

  • @zzzaaa09900 Not true in the slightest.

  • Wow, well said.

  • this may seem immature but replace 'toys' with 'penis'

  • @zzzaaa09900 and given your claims of course you will, of course, want to answer the simple questions put to you re embryology in your koran LOL

    come on..wow me with your knowledge from one who thinks babies are born muslim LOL

    remember the very basis of islam is that

    1. an allah created you (yet there isn't a shred of proof of any such allah) and

    2.koran is 100% accurate/true...when one would have to be blind/dumb not to READ THE ERRORS & even know their sources

  • @proudfemale lol. no answer again.. piss off unless you gonna prove where you seen errors..

    also if you can teach a dog to drive a car, then i will teach you the proof of God.

  • @zzzaaa09900 There is no proof of God, otherwise you wouldn't need to BELIEVE in God. If God's existence could be proven, then faith wouldn't be necessary. Now kindly fuck off and troll about something less sacred than Christopher Hitchens ... such as God. See what I did there? I repeat: fuck off.

  • @Alexiaden93 You win! :D

  • @proudfemale bitchens will be forgotten in 10 years yet God will remain forever.. XD

  • @zzzaaa09900 Which God will remain forever? Horus, God of War, born of a Virgin? Or perhaps Zeus is more to your liking. Or do you mean the Judeistic, Christian, or islamic God. Perhaps you mean all three. If so, does your god sanction witch hunts? Or is he of a more genocidal inclination (for he wiped out the amalikites and the entire population of earth minus noah).

  • @TheSittingArchitect Nice hitchslap on a fool!

  • @TheSittingArchitect God will remain forever.. for over 2000 years He is still here.. bitchens (who?) will be forgotten.. snigger snigger

  • @zzzaaa09900 Oh I get it. You're a troll! It's hard to tell these days.

  • Christopher Hitchens at his finest... i couldn't have said it better myself!

  • Funny how most (if not all) intolerant atheists (like this one) don't live to be old.

  • @zzzaaa09900 Circumcision is disgusting, check out videos of it, it's done without anesthesia, and BTW, good or bad it sholud be the kid's choice, not the grownups.

  • @zzzaaa09900 and of course 'weak submissive slaveboy' calling me a troll for being on you tube is very amusing

    I CARE about the innocent victims of islam...you don't

    does that make you DIRTY and SICK lol

    yep

  • @zzzaaa09900 I find your immorality quite hideous.. utterly disgraceful, with what you support and how you talk

    so WHAT make an adult male choose to 'ignore the errors' in koran, accept being lied to, and become a submissive slave given what submissive means as in 'weak,easily manipulated, accepts commands without question" etc

    what is the 'dying like a dog' comment about- do tell

  • @proudfemale he prematurely died cancer on mainly due to his unhealthy life-style of booze and tobacco (like a dog).. he trolled mother teresa and henry kissinger.. he was a drunk fool who only favoured israel after finding out he was 1/32 jewish.. lol.. next!

  • @zzzaaa09900 so dogs smoke do they....he was admired/respected for his vast knowledge, honesty and courage...things muslims can't cope with

    was his death 'like a dog' worse than muslim girl dying after being ripped to pieces by husband, or than the victims MURDERED by dirty prick mohammed when they didn't accept what he went to offer them....or children having bombs strapped on them by muslims

    Im still laughing that you think humans born muslim LOL

    you make a good muslim..it requires gullible

  • @zzzaaa09900 I see...so you were a muslim initially, then atheist, then muslim re 'revert'

    surely you wouldn't be using the comical 'revert' word when being a convert...surely in 2011 you wouldn't believe teachings that babies are born babies, but muslim lol

    so you accepted 'right to choose to join; islam but now SUPPORT islams denial of same right inflicted on majority born into ummah AND murder as penalty for non belief/leaving

    what was with the 'dying like a dog' comment?

  • @proudfemale no. i was born into atheist.. but all babies are born muslim.. what joy.. now i have reverted back to islam and my life is so much better, i am happier and there is more peace in my life..

    errors in the quran? dont make me laugh troll, islam is the true religion.. just cos you have been lied to slave girl.. dont believe everything you read slave girl.. question things, thats how i accepted islam.. keep trolling slave..

  • @zzzaaa09900 purleeze...how utterly comical you are so 'backward' you believe babies are born muslim...LOL

    WHAT would make you so stupid that you make such a childish and nonsense claim LOL

    let me assure you kid, no human is born anything other than a baby...islam /being muslim is something that is taught to people/inflicted on many

    islam true...LOL

    WHAT ABOUT exactly, given the errors in koran

    did you bother to read it before 'submitting' to support human misery

  • @zzzaaa09900 question things lol...like WHAT

    you've just stated babies are born not babies, but muslim lol

    did you question WHY there isn't a shred of proof of any allah...the errors staring us all in face in ummah....wife beating/degradation of women a male right...or the pagan rituals of chopping healthy tissue off dicks and fasting lol

    did you question the taught stories re whorehouse in sky LOL

    whats with the 'slave' nonsense to me...its YOU who is shackled

  • @zzzaaa09900 Please!! You are taunting somebody with childish name calling ¨slave girl¨, and in the next breath you accuse her of being a troll. Could you possibly be more of a hypocrite? I doubt it. If you want to demonstrate that you are right about something, it pays to just stick to the facts (evidence + reasoning). You claim to have approached Islam rationally. You might then consider defending it rationally. So far your defense is a barrage of glib assertions and insults.

  • Firstly letś look at this claim you make that babies are born Muslim. What doeś this even mean? Consider a baby lying in a crib, looking at itś own pudgy little hands waving around in front of itś eyes. It barely has any comprehension of what those things are or that they belong to it. The baby doesn't understand anything; even what a baby is or why it exists in the first place. To belong to a religion, means to hold a particular set of convictions and supernatural beliefs.