1) Dan.9:24-27 (especially v.27) has absolutely nothing to do with Antichrist; there are plenty of passages that speak about Antichrist, but Dan.9:27 is NOT one of them!
2) Both preterists and futurists completely abandon the historic, Protestant view of the 1260 day time prophecies (Dan.7:25, 12:7; Rev.11:2,3; 12:6,14; 13:5). They are all speaking of the SAME TIME period; and they are ALL day=year. Yes! 1260 literal YEARS! This is the only way to properly interpret Bible prophecy.
A NT vers that says the temple will be rebuild: Mt 24:15 ?!! How can he denie the Words of Jesus to His 12 disciples; and flip those Words over to a futur, still yet to come generation; and then say that in this very vers is hidden a new, still to be build, temple! Don't you think he is here breaking some rules of exegeses? I suggest he'll read the book of Hebrews over again! Why does he want to go back to the former things that were a shadow of things to come? Was the Lamb not good enough?
Tommy's interpretation of Acts 2:15-16 where Peter quotes Joel is most telling. It shows the utter and complete nonsense of his eschatological system. That is in no way what Peter is trying to say...I'm amazed
"For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day. But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel; And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh" Acts 2:15-17
"God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son" Heb 1:1-2
1) Dan.9:24-27 (especially v.27) has absolutely nothing to do with Antichrist; there are plenty of passages that speak about Antichrist, but Dan.9:27 is NOT one of them!
2) Both preterists and futurists completely abandon the historic, Protestant view of the 1260 day time prophecies (Dan.7:25, 12:7; Rev.11:2,3; 12:6,14; 13:5). They are all speaking of the SAME TIME period; and they are ALL day=year. Yes! 1260 literal YEARS! This is the only way to properly interpret Bible prophecy.
rkg62976 1 year ago
A NT vers that says the temple will be rebuild: Mt 24:15 ?!! How can he denie the Words of Jesus to His 12 disciples; and flip those Words over to a futur, still yet to come generation; and then say that in this very vers is hidden a new, still to be build, temple! Don't you think he is here breaking some rules of exegeses? I suggest he'll read the book of Hebrews over again! Why does he want to go back to the former things that were a shadow of things to come? Was the Lamb not good enough?
MrPvdb 1 year ago
Tommy's interpretation of Acts 2:15-16 where Peter quotes Joel is most telling. It shows the utter and complete nonsense of his eschatological system. That is in no way what Peter is trying to say...I'm amazed
selviskk 1 year ago
"For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it is but the third hour of the day. But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel; And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh" Acts 2:15-17
"God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son" Heb 1:1-2
Obviously they were living in the last days.
selviskk 1 year ago