fuck the evil Windsor + Rothschilds + Rockefeller + FreeMason Bloodlines. the Akashik Records hold these truths and the wrong doing by these evil families will not be forgotten.
Truth of the matter is that Queen Elizabeth I was a Illuminati Mason, of the CAIN serpent bloodline,& a total bitch. Mary Queen of Scotts was a good person much loved by her people. ABOLISH THE BRITISH ROYAL MONARCHY, HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD and the KHAZAR ZIONIST LOBBY.Prince Charles is related to child sacrificer Vlad the Impaler. The Monarchy is certainly not British. Prince Phillip and abdicated Prince Edward were great friends with Zionist Nazi's and their best friend Rothschild funded Hitler.
poor mary...just a shitty day all around, a botched beheading, than to make matters worse her wigs pulled off exposing her nearly bald gray haired head! i mean damn!
I know the name of the background song, its The Three Ravens, but i can not find exectly this version of the song, anyone know name of the singer or anything else? i want to find it very much..
Catholics like Mary killed manymore. Their oppression of true Christian Protestants & Jews in the Inquisition and the Holocaust is unsurpassed. Fascism is a catholic phenomenon. It was never politically viable in any Protestant country--never garnering more than 10% of the vote. Hitler: born in catholic Austria to catholic parents who got a papal dispensation to marry, came to power in catholic Bavaria, supported by catholics in ireland who never lifted a finger to stop him. WASPs beat fascism.
@jkirk1626 I'll mention that news to my Catholic friends and family who have previously been operating under the misconception that they had anything to do with winning WWII. What a retarded inaccurate statement.
@jkirk1626 wow, really? u blame catholics for the holocaust? pathetic. hitler switched to Aryan paganism. the nazis had no friendly afilliation with the catholic church. many catholic people and priests, nuns, monks etc were murdered for helping or supporting the allies. don't let ur emotions get in the way of fact.
@bh5496 Hitler and the Nazis were Catholic. They attended church and mass. They prayed to the Bible god. They had the cross as part of the symbols in their uniforms. Hilter said killing Jews was his service for the Christian god.
@Alkhemist10 why should I be? I was just saying big fucking deal. Unless you got a huge family fortune that name isn't worth anything and I"m sure countless tens of thousands of others are related to the Stuarts too.
Mary Queen of Scots is heralded by devout Catholics as a martyr, but this was clearly because they hated Elizabeth so much. Mary was married three times, first to the young King of France who died after only about a year and a half, second to Henry Stewart (a cousin) who was assassinated, presumably on Mary's orders because the marriage was unhappy (he suspected her of cheating on him with her male secretary), while her third marriage was in a Protestant ceremony to a Protestant earl!
Simon Schama has his biases, but I think this moment was the best of his career. It is the most moving presentation I have experienced in a long time. Quite outstanding.
@AnahSkywalker -PC revisionism-there are actual names of each victim throughout the 3 centuries of inquisition>total is 5000 people.in france the actual numbers killed by catholics were 15000..
peanuts compared to the jihadi invasions which mohammad himself started against jew and christian,this grew to a blood bath as his apostle heirs attacked without provocation zoroastrians(persia) and hindus (india)killing millions who wouldn't convert or not wanted as slaves. that;s why islam is so hated
@bademoxy Peanuts compared to Genghis Khan and his Mongol successors who pillaged raped and destroyed throughout Asia, Russia and Europe. That's why Mongols are so hated. Peanuts compared to the mass depopulation of Europe ans especially Germany during the Thirty Years War. That's why Christians are so hated. Oh wait...
@AnahSkywalker You put the word "not" in there and that is a mistake: all religions ARE barbaric. And I don't care if I offend other people's beliefs or not. Anything that justifies the ill-treatment of other human beings is not worthy of respect of any kind and I won't do it just because I'll make people cry. I want you to face the evil treatment of gay people and women and anyone not in the same religious club you are in. Read your Bible: it is full of barbaric behavior..
@qwertyasdaz Elizabeth I knew she signed the death warrant. She knew her Cousin was a threat to her life. She HAD to put on a good show of grieving because she knew the execution of her cousin was an act of War. Monarchs too were supposed to be above such Courts and sentences - she was the first Monarch ever to be sentenced to Death. And it was her COUSIN. I'm sure she also had thoughts that she will burn in hell for killing her own blood relative.
Elizabeth put off Mary's execution for as long as she could. Even after her revealed involvment in the Ridolfi and Throckmorton plot, Mary was spared by Elizabeth despite the desires of all her closest councillers such as Cecil, Leicester and Walsigham. Mary's involvment in the Babington plot left Elizabeth with no other choice: as long as Mary was alive, even despite imprisonment, she posed a threat to Elizabeth that the English Queen simply could not risk.
For all the deaths she caused, her execution was well-deserved. If to be a Catholic you have to kill for your church there is no way, I could ever be a Catholic. But with the cry from the Roman Catholic Church "One True Church" they want all of Christendom to come back to their fold to a church which has put idols on the altar and a pope who kissed the Koran. But Protestants are forever anathema But priests who molest children are not anathema.
@InnateNobility When you compare her and her ilk to the numbers once Protestants decided they wanted to live that they killed to stop the vileness of the RCC, the Inquisition, you can never show the numbers because they don't exist.
The only place you can find more barbarism is in Islam.
EVIDENTLY MARY WAS INDEED EXTREAMLY STUPID...... ELIZABETH THE SPIDER SIMPLY HAD TO INVITE HER AS A GUEST AND THE FLY TOOK THE BAIT ALONG WITH THE HEADSMEN'S AX..... THIS PROVES A LOW I.Q. AS WELL AS DARWIN'S THEORY !
@LilChuckyWoodenHead YOU KNOW WHAT? YOUR STUPID! ELIZABETH WAS MEAN TO HER AND MARY DIDN'T ACTUALLY WANT TO EXECUTE HER DEAR COUSIN! HER IDEA WAS ACTUALLY TO DEAL WITH ELIZABETH!
@jesepy13 Royal families are creepy because they are the products of incest, something people do to dogs and call them "pedigree". Incest is incest and it's disgusting.
@marksmith46 Many. But a lot of people died of natural causes quite young. Getting a scratch and dying of the resulting infection could happen quite easily.
@marksmith46 yes, for the vast majority of people ( subjects in england ) life was nasty, brutish and short with an average life expectancy of about 27 years old. most children born died before the age of 5 of communicable diseases. just remember there was no modern medical care and the theory of the time was that diseases were caused by miasmas or bad air.
@WinterHaven Oh look. You say age 40, SocratestheGadfly says 27. Anyway, I'm 51, not 12: I know stuff too. I read that many people died back then of having no sense of humor: please save yourselves before it's too late.
@marksmith46 How am I supposed to know your educational level or age-you posted a question and I answered it. and if you think I'm going to look at every single poster's main page you are gravely mistaken.
@WinterHaven Behaving gravely is part of your problem. You need to learn to recognize facetious and/or rhetorical questions. I have a feeling you just like to lord your knowledge over other people so you can feel grand. Good God you must be fun at parties.
Murder is murder. It took 15 minutes for her to die. Many people romatize this era but in reality it truly was the dark ages, primitive, barbaric, cruel, harsh and nightmarish.
I was in nursing - and have seen violent deaths - people who say this is just the way it was have no empathy nor can comprehend this atrocious act. Elizabeth, like all the monarchs were and still are heartless lizards. Mary had to be murdered so Elizabeth could get the crown. A kingdom built on blood and bones.
@ofcelticblood You seem to be overlooking the fact that it was already Elizabeth' s crown and had been for 30 years. Elizabeths reign was actually far LESS bloody than most. Whats more, had Mary succeeded in wresting the crown then it would indeed have been a 'kingdom built on blood and bones' - that of the 1000s who'd have died in the inevitable sectarian civil war. Mary, didn't seem troubled by this ..
Mary was not Queen of France for long; she was widowed on 5 December 1560. Mary then returned to Scotland, arriving in Leith on 19 August 1561. Four years later, she married her first cousin, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley. Their union was unhappy and in February 1567, there was a huge explosion at their house, and Darnley was found dead, apparently strangled, in the garden.
She soon married James Hepburn, 4th Earl of Bothwell, who was generally believed to be Darnley's murderer.
@rollingthunder67 and you're too young for this site, at least to be a member. the age limit is 13, why are you only 9, and allowed to be a member?
but i think it was a good idea to go on youtube for your history lesson. i did the same, when we spoke about the dieger death here in sweden for history.
@Tokiohotelgirl97 I've often wondered that - but how many of those portraits actually look like real living people? If you observe contemporary paintings of castles and animals etc many don't look lifelike either - seems there was very limited knowledge of perspective for a start.
Unknown, Simon Schama's documentary series; A History Of Britain, which this clip was taken from, is one of the best overviews of British history ever produced and is extremely balanced and fair, the first part of this episode is spent detailing the catholic plots to overview Elizabeth and how these were uncovered, yet she still kept Mary alive and treated her more like a guest than a prisoner. This clip is from Episode 7.
Unknown, Simon Schama's documentary series; A History Of Britain, which this clip was taken from, is one of the best overviews of British history ever produced and is extremely balanced and fair, the first part of this episode is spent detailing the catholic plots to overview Elizabeth and how these were uncovered, yet she still kept Mary alive and treated her more like a guest than a prisoner. This clip is from Episode 7
One truth continues today. The setting up of a person to be a target. To receive all the insults of the unhappy demon possessed masses who are unaware of their inflictions done to them by the very puppet masters who set up kings, queens, presidents and all manner of scapegoats. The world hasn't changed much. Same character types calling the shots. Morons gorging on media's lying control. Few see the works of the controllers. Same old patterns no plot variety. Only variety in human design.
And we had a wii, a music room, an art room, a pool, a gym and lots of other stuff. But back in Mary/Elizabeth's time, they had NOTHING even close to that. ANd after all that, she forgave the executioner, died with honor, and she bared all of the people's insults with a strong heart. I have to say I'm actually proud of her, regardless of what people at the time thought of her and her (catholicism). RIP Mary, you deserve it, Elizabeth as well. They had both made history in their own way.
I hate how the historian talks like he was on the defensive of one side and looked like he didn't care Mary died. I'm not saying that he should be on Mary's side, but he should at leats have a bit of sympathy in his voice for Mary's death. Back in those days, it was extremely difficult to live long and live from your beliefs; you had to follow one's religion to be accepted and live.
@unknownXbeing She would have done better to show a little common sense instead of marching to her death like a determined martyr. She could have gone to France after escaping Scotland; did she really think Elizabeth would hand her an army after she'd refused to give up her "claim" to the English throne? Right.
Actually, Mary was knowingly involved with the Babington Plot, a plot to kill Elizabeth and put Mary on the throne, which was the reason she was executed. That, and during this period of English history, executions of powerful people were not uncommon: it seems barbaric today, but the people of Tudor England were surrounded by execution all the time, and families often watched members sent to the block; you can't judge history by a modern mindset fairly. It has to be in context.
@unknownXbeing I'm not saying that it would be better if anyone would just give in to a fight when they can't win, but the point of my comment was to share my pov on how Mary felt. For when I observe a fight, I look at both sides. And on Mary's side, well, let's just say it wasn't fortunate. I mean, how would anybody like to be imprisoned for 20 years, raped and have an entire nation hate your guts? Regardless of what her emprisonment was for, I still respect her for her patience on that part.
@unknownXbeing Face it every proper Englishman, was taught to hate Mary Of Scotland. If Elizabeth, (a known cunning actress, as suited her politics), was in a "tear" over her cousin's death is in part due to the fact that she may have set a presidence for her own execution/murder someday. Think about it, the governmental head ordering the death of a queen?
@molarmama5 I agree, though, it is believed that the parliament ordered Mary's execution without Elizabeth's absolute consent. There is much to be said about the complexity of that period of time between the two Queens. Absolutely.
@unknownXbeing He was not fair at all. Though everything he spoke of was true, it was not in the harsh way that he speaks of it. There was too much going on to just call it pathetic, though, from a rational outlook it seems that way.
wasnt henry notorious for beheading his wives was this just another example of henrys wife beheadings was this another example of as they say on the tv series the good wife silently marching to the executioner with nomistep no wimper accepting your fate without a inkle of a struggle what did they pay marys benefactors what did they promise how many men must die before the truth finally bleeds from the cross the exact truth will never be known let the dead rest they stink up the joint say confusi
From what I believe the royal family are desendants from the tribe of Dan in the Bible. The tribe of Dan can be lead back to King David. The tribe of Dan left God for following pagan ways. They only pretend to be protestants. People who follow God wouldn't execute let alone treat others horribly because they are catholics. Is this what Jesus would do absolutely not.
This is very awful I cried when I read about what happened to her. She wasn't well liked for being a catholic, giving money to the citizens rather than give it to the rich, and the royal family. Imagine having to die like this, and people complain about what we have in the states. Queen Elizabeth doesn't even deserve that title she is a murderer. England royalty sucks its just a bunch of greedy people who are never satisfied.
mfkrs scared to talk to me operation kill mary traction ab 1 subslash b applies coming in on a paraxectanjent b coaurse code mary target aguired from 2k milllion miles coming in on direct 1kmil miles parsect b respond target aguired fire target decending direct hit code green
nobody has to do anything your trying to tell me he did it but didnt want to every executioner is there because he likes his job every crackpot in town lines up for the job and they even do it for free why did he hold the head up everybody saw what they all came to see a gory murder things like this set back the evolution of man for 100s of yrs
@ghostman3331 Executioners were bound to their craft and position. If the king or queen commanded it then it had to be done. It's like with us now: we have to work for a living, even though we may sometimes hate our job. His own feelings did not matter in the case. Also, executions were viewed as social gatherings. It was the place to be and the act to see, especially if someone of high power or royalty was to be executed because it would inevitably be historically significant.
@souverignofsilence so your saying the exocutioner was part of a secret society with free home free food free money and was a silent royalty in england knowone knowing who they were traveling among city living next door to wealthy business men unknown livin the easy life except for the nagging consious knowing what theve done thats low and selling yourself out
@ghostman3331 Nope, that's what you're saying. True, being an executioner took a heavy blow of one's position amidst society. They had to deal with people despising them, rioting against them and their families and not to mention the psychological effects of doing the deed. In fact, many committed suicide in the end: that's how bad it got. But it was job in the end and they were paid for their services. The victims themselves had to pay before their execution.
@souverignofsilence so you saying poor me the executioner everone ridicules me yeah no wonder people hated them like this dude held her head high for everone to see he got off on it no wonder people despised his sadistic ass who cares if he was psycologically disturbed after the fact the fact is he got off on it he was a pervert and probably a serrial killer of that time traveling the streets killing and jack the ripper got the blame defend the executioner if you want im saying he was a murderer
@ghostman3331 Certainly, he is a murderer. He carried out the act. But did he want to do it? Did he enjoy it? No one can affirmably say. He most certainly can't speak for himself, nor can the eyewitness accounts or historical records vouch for your interpretation of the executioners character. As for holding the head to the crowd the act was customary during the time, especially if the victim was of noble blood or formerly in power. It was a sort of tangible example of the King and Gods will.
@souverignofsilence somewhere in the world there is a piece of paper hid in a safe along with other forbidden knowledge probably in the vatican the name of the executioner dont get me wrong i really dont care what his name is maybe this forbidden knowledge is best kept locked up but see i dont even know why she was executed in the first place something about her being a traitor but what are the facts did she really deserve to die if it was today or can we say it would be a cold blooded murder
@ghostman3331 Now that's a far more interesting theory! :) Mary Stuart posed as a threat to the English throne. Many believed that she was the rightful heir to the English crown because Henry VIII's marriage to Anne Boleyn wasn't recognized as lawful by the Catholic church and therefore Elizabeth's birth was considered illegitimate. Her death, unjustifiable as it was, was for political purposes only.
@souverignofsilence what about this then could the catholic church have ordered her execution and what was their reason for her ex-communication through illagitamacy was henry 8 already married to another woman when he married anne i thought he had many wives so why didnt the catholic church recognize the marriage was the catholic church in too cozy with elizabeth and didnt want change and somehow spin the execution into martyrdom how can the church order an execution and make martre same time
@ghostman3331 Henry proclaimed himself the head of the church of England, which was a big "No, no" for the Catholic Church. As such, he could easily secure his divorce from Catherine and marry Anne without the need of the church's permission. This is what spearheaded the break from Rome and the Reformation. The Catholic Church did not order Mary's execution at all. She was a Catholic: if anything, they wanted her to succeed the throne of England and shift the Reformation back.
There are three subject spoken of here, they are the house, the kingdom and the throne. From the time of David all three of these things have been in existence, and they will continue until this earth age is over. Why? Because God established them and He protects them.
Nathan told David all the words of the vision exactly as God revealed it to him. Though David meant well, the idea was not in accordance with the plan of God, and the desires of God. The lesson here though again, is that we should always seek instruction from God first in matters that pertain to Him. Ask and ye shall receive, seek and it will be known to you the will of God in the matter.
II Samuel 7:18 "Then went king David in, and sat before the Lord, and he said, "Who am I, O Lord God? and what is my house, that thou hast brought me hitherto?"
After the Prophet spoke to David, he was humbled before the Lord. Stop and think for a moment what this promise meant. David's children will always be a royal house and have a throne to sit upon. There will always be a nation and nations to govern, and it will be David's kids that will sit on those thrones. When you trace the thrones of all the kings of Europe back in their lineage, they all come from the seed of David. Think about it.
The more I learn about the XVIth century and afterwards, the more I tend to agree with you (about the number of Protestant and Catholic martyrs, under a ruler of the other persuasion).
Being raised in the Catholic faith (but no longer recognizing the authority of the pope, cardinals and bishops, etc.), I sense however that some places where Protestant formed the majority (Netherlands, New Amsterdam, etc.) were relatively more tolerant than the Catholic ones.
Said Mary: "Ye interpret the Scriptures in one manner, and they [the Roman Catholic teachers] interpret in another; whom shall I believe, and who shall be judge?" {GC 251.1} "Ye shall believe God, that plainly speaketh in His word," answered the Reformer;"and farther than the word teaches you, ye neither shall believe the one nor the other. The word of God is plain in itself; and if there appear any obscurity in one place, the Holy Ghost,... explains the same more clearly in other places
How do you truly arrive at such a simplistic conclusion without checking out the facts? What facts, you may well ask? Let's just put aside all the thee's and thou's of the bible, and just objectively look at just ONE of it's claims of historical note. The life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN PROPHECIES MADE BY PEOPLE CENTURIES BEFORE EXPLAINING IN DETAIL this man's life. This man who said that he was God in the flesh. Unlike any other. Psalms 53:1
You are calling me simplistic when you believe in a magic invisible man in the sky!!!! Also.....do you really think you are going to prove any point by quoting from teh fucking Bible....the most popular publication of bullshit in history. Just accept that life is meaningless, nothing happens when you die and start enjoying the time you have.
Your judgement is clouded. Nevertheless, historical facts are facts, whether you or I choose to understand their significance or not. Only TRUTH prevails in the end. Look around you, everything else falls away. Jesus Christ makes some profound claims, like "I am the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE. No man comes to the FATHER but by ME." This man in history made it possible for you to live forever and ever and ever, if you accept him. CHECK OUT THE FACTS.
I am so proud to be Greek Orthodox and a descendant of the Byzantine Empire. The latter was a multi-national entity that practiced tolerance of all faiths (Jews held high academic and commercial positions, Muslims and other Christians were likewise prominent). Protestant monarchs were no better than their Catholic counterparts: the roster of Catholic martyrs under Protestant rulers is nearly as long as the roster of Protestant martyrs under Catholic rulers.
The more I learn about the XVIth century and afterwards, the more I tend to agree with you (about the number of Protestant and Catholic martyrs, under a ruler of the other persuasion).
Being raised in the Catholic faith (but no longer recognizing the authority of the pope, cardinals and bishops, etc.), I sense however that some places where Protestant formed the majority (Netherlands, New Amsterdam, etc.) were relatively more tolerant than the Catholic ones.
The more I learn about the XVIth century and afterwards, the more I tend to agree with you (about the number of Protestant and Catholic martyrs, under a ruler of the other persuasion).
Being raised in the Catholic faith (but no longer recognizing the authority of the pope, cardinals and bishops, etc.), I sense however that some places where Protestant formed the majority (Netherlands, New Amsterdam, etc.) were relatively more tolerant than the Catholic ones.
The singer is Sarah Leonard singing John Harle's version of The Three Ravens. It's available on John Harles' album entitled "Terror and Magnificence." It is also available on the soundtrack for this series "A History of Britain"
There was blood lust as this regicide was applicable to QE1, & QE1 knew all the facts.
Further QE1's Virgin Queen status was now bloody, with the judicial murder of a catholic martyr; the mother of the next King of England; James 1st.
Mary of Scots execution was needless; she could have been skipped in the succession, allowed to see her son, & otherwise lead a very watched life in either nunnery, or court, in a guilded cage.
Quite the trophy, the head of a fellow anointed prince.
yes that may be all well and good in the "enlightend" age of POST MODERN reasoning, however you must put yourself into the late 16th century world of england of that time. the execution of mary was necessary due to her treasonous behavior. treason is a very serious crime and it was RIGHTLY done just as the execution of julius and ethel rosenberg was JUST and RIGHT!!
come on, execution of a woman who was plotting against her? Besides, if MQOS had been queen of England, England never would have become a world power. I shudder to think where progress, Anglo Saxon society and women's status would be without Elizabeth.
@evaperonfan do you say always the same??? Mary Stuart was anglosaxon too!!! hello!!!! and if the women had best treaty in anglosaxon countries why Victoria can`t rule in Hannover?
answer me, please...I`m just a very retarded latin man ..remember in latin american we live in the neolitic age yet...
Don't be naive: Mary alive was a threat to Elizabeth and Protestant England - someone was always trying to use her as the focus of a rebellion. And Elizabeth was on the horns of a real dilemma, because Mary's execution created a presedent for killing an annointed monarch which could be used even to get rid of her, and was used by Cromwell 60 years later to execute Charles I. - There are no cut and dried answers in politics, and Mary was definately a political animal. Just an unsuccessful one.
@Hkepfer James didn't WANT her back. He refused to accept a deal that would have freed her because it also set her up as co-ruler of Scotland. And Mary refused a deal that would have left her off the throne. She actually wrote a will leaving her "right to the English throne" to Phillip of Spain because her son was a Protestant.
Elizabeth kept Mary alive for 19 years; most monarchs would have killed her the minute she rode into their country, let alone throughout many plots to overthrow her.
@happybkwrm Mary did no such thing as to disinherit James, no document has EVER been found stating she did, when her time came to die she went bravely and full of dignity. Mary LOVED James despite his neglect because he was brought up to hate her tbh and Mary went to death peacefully instead of spitefully disinheriting her only child. Eliabeth would never have killed Mary immediately because she would have had spain and france on her in a second if she done it without reason.
What is interesting, however, is that after he became King of England, James ordered the remains of Mary to be transferred to Westminster Abbey and to be given a fairly elaborate interment ceremony. I suppose that when he reached adulthood and was able to discern opinions for himself, he realized this was his mother, and that despite her schemings (who did NOT scheme among the European royals), she made it possible for him to rule over two kingdoms.
@hayleyshikari Read Antonia Fraser's bio of Mary Stuart. Mary condemned her son strongly. She wrote to Phillip of Spain, giving him her "rights" to the English throne.
And no one in France or Spain cared about Mary herself. Phillip just used her death as an excuse to invade England - AFTER she was executed. No one in Spain or France cared about Mary herself. Even the English Catholics used her as a symbol. She would have been a puppet ruler; she'd proven she wasn't capable of ruling.
@happybkwrm i have i bought it in Edinburgh castle gift shop :) and it says on page 684 *But Phillip was allowing himself to be deluded. Although Mary had twice confided England conditionally to Phillip, if James failed to become a catholic -in her will her will of 1577 and her letters to Mendoza of 1586- no cluase existed in the last testament which Mary made on the eve of her death in Fotheringhay, and no other will has been found supporting his claims. In any case it is clear from -
@hayleyshikari I check. Fine, she didn't put it in her final will. But she did try to disinherit him and "give" England to Phillip II, which shows how out of reality she was; England was never hers to give.
"On the same date (May 20, 1586), as if to prove her lack of contact with reality Mary also wrote to Mendoza in Paris confiding her rights to the crown of England conditionally to his master Phillip II if James had not become a Catholic by the date of her death."
@happybkwrm contemporary accounts Mary went to her death serenely, rather than in a bitter mood which may have led to a official last-minute disinheritance of her son.* On the page after it said James sent one of his mothers servants to fetch his wife as a reward that would have been seen as a great honor to go fetch the new Queen. Anyway if E had immediately chopped of Mary's head that would have caused trouble because she would have had no reason monarchs did not do that at the time.
That's quite a generalisation you've made about the English. Quite racist infact. Oh what a surprise.... you must be from Scotland? If that were said about other races there would be an outcry.
@yallapilko sorry your right because i extremely offensive and horrible to english people for saying they dislike mary queen of scots, shame i could be nick griffins kid. im such a racist :|
fuck the evil Windsor + Rothschilds + Rockefeller + FreeMason Bloodlines. the Akashik Records hold these truths and the wrong doing by these evil families will not be forgotten.
thasupremeoverlord 3 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Truth of the matter is that Queen Elizabeth I was a Illuminati Mason, of the CAIN serpent bloodline,& a total bitch. Mary Queen of Scotts was a good person much loved by her people. ABOLISH THE BRITISH ROYAL MONARCHY, HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD and the KHAZAR ZIONIST LOBBY.Prince Charles is related to child sacrificer Vlad the Impaler. The Monarchy is certainly not British. Prince Phillip and abdicated Prince Edward were great friends with Zionist Nazi's and their best friend Rothschild funded Hitler.
JillAngie3 3 days ago
Comment removed
JillAngie3 3 days ago
If religion were not such a factor the monarchy could have lived in peace and harmony.
Tonganpride1000 1 month ago
poor mary...just a shitty day all around, a botched beheading, than to make matters worse her wigs pulled off exposing her nearly bald gray haired head! i mean damn!
chykim1 2 months ago
I know the name of the background song, its The Three Ravens, but i can not find exectly this version of the song, anyone know name of the singer or anything else? i want to find it very much..
ablabuda11 3 months ago
@ablabuda11
youtube . com/watch?v=prmKMrxG5no&feature=related
Cardiffdance 2 months ago
@Cardiffdance
Ty :)
ablabuda11 2 months ago
I'm an American of Irish descent, and this is heartbreaking. I know I shouldn't care, but I do.
ebonics4everyone 3 months ago
Catholics like Mary killed manymore. Their oppression of true Christian Protestants & Jews in the Inquisition and the Holocaust is unsurpassed. Fascism is a catholic phenomenon. It was never politically viable in any Protestant country--never garnering more than 10% of the vote. Hitler: born in catholic Austria to catholic parents who got a papal dispensation to marry, came to power in catholic Bavaria, supported by catholics in ireland who never lifted a finger to stop him. WASPs beat fascism.
jkirk1626 3 months ago
@jkirk1626 I'll mention that news to my Catholic friends and family who have previously been operating under the misconception that they had anything to do with winning WWII. What a retarded inaccurate statement.
deaconsmom2000 3 months ago
@jkirk1626 wow, really? u blame catholics for the holocaust? pathetic. hitler switched to Aryan paganism. the nazis had no friendly afilliation with the catholic church. many catholic people and priests, nuns, monks etc were murdered for helping or supporting the allies. don't let ur emotions get in the way of fact.
bh5496 1 month ago 2
@bh5496 Hitler and the Nazis were Catholic. They attended church and mass. They prayed to the Bible god. They had the cross as part of the symbols in their uniforms. Hilter said killing Jews was his service for the Christian god.
TheSpeaknoevil 1 week ago
I've tried scrubbing a laptop clean of clotted blood and mine died too.
nicedog1 4 months ago
Comment removed
nicedog1 4 months ago
What is this music and who is singing?
nicedog1 4 months ago
I'm a blood relative of Jack the Ripper and I'm very proud!
WinterHaven 4 months ago
queen Elizabeth was a B$%#, she was always scared Mary would take her thorn
Kaz10005 4 months ago
King James and Mary Stuart were my great great great great great great great grandparents. My middle name is Stuart.
Alkhemist10 4 months ago
@Alkhemist10 and your ancestors are also composed of apes. who cares.
WinterHaven 4 months ago
@WinterHaven aww are you jealous?
Alkhemist10 4 months ago
@Alkhemist10 why should I be? I was just saying big fucking deal. Unless you got a huge family fortune that name isn't worth anything and I"m sure countless tens of thousands of others are related to the Stuarts too.
WinterHaven 4 months ago
@WinterHaven yeah the aristocracies have been pushed aside so I don't get any of the things I would have but I have royalty in my blood :)
Alkhemist10 4 months ago
@Alkhemist10 Jack the Ripper was my great great grandfather, and that's something I'm proud of!
WinterHaven 4 months ago
@WinterHaven Good for you man, but wasn't Jack the ripper a woman?
Alkhemist10 4 months ago
Mary Queen of Scots is heralded by devout Catholics as a martyr, but this was clearly because they hated Elizabeth so much. Mary was married three times, first to the young King of France who died after only about a year and a half, second to Henry Stewart (a cousin) who was assassinated, presumably on Mary's orders because the marriage was unhappy (he suspected her of cheating on him with her male secretary), while her third marriage was in a Protestant ceremony to a Protestant earl!
spartacus3ful 4 months ago
Simon Schama has his biases, but I think this moment was the best of his career. It is the most moving presentation I have experienced in a long time. Quite outstanding.
tmvga 5 months ago
@JohnyKimbled You can't actually know unless you've been there at the time, which is pretty much impossible.
unknownXbeing 6 months ago
Thanks for uploading this. l was going to do it myself but you saved me a job :)
Was my favorite moment from A History of Britain.... and the music, wow!
NeedleFactoryTube 6 months ago
lv never cried at youtube before. not before this.
NeedleFactoryTube 6 months ago
R.I.P
ssrider7 6 months ago
Wow...this dweeb doesn't even try to sound objective. What a jerk.
Jacobitess 6 months ago
@bademoxy watch The Holy Prophet Muhammad 's Letter to the Monks of St. Catherine in Mt. Sinai and then tell me how evil and barbaric Muhammed was!
AnahSkywalker 7 months ago
@AnahSkywalker ..and then he went and stoned an adulterer to death.
marksmith46 4 months ago
@courag1 that's a lie! Islam is not barbaric just like any other religion! Don't be so ignorant and offensive to other peoples beliefs
AnahSkywalker 7 months ago
@AnahSkywalker -PC revisionism-there are actual names of each victim throughout the 3 centuries of inquisition>total is 5000 people.in france the actual numbers killed by catholics were 15000..
peanuts compared to the jihadi invasions which mohammad himself started against jew and christian,this grew to a blood bath as his apostle heirs attacked without provocation zoroastrians(persia) and hindus (india)killing millions who wouldn't convert or not wanted as slaves. that;s why islam is so hated
bademoxy 7 months ago 2
@bademoxy Peanuts compared to Genghis Khan and his Mongol successors who pillaged raped and destroyed throughout Asia, Russia and Europe. That's why Mongols are so hated. Peanuts compared to the mass depopulation of Europe ans especially Germany during the Thirty Years War. That's why Christians are so hated. Oh wait...
571jans 1 week ago
@AnahSkywalker You put the word "not" in there and that is a mistake: all religions ARE barbaric. And I don't care if I offend other people's beliefs or not. Anything that justifies the ill-treatment of other human beings is not worthy of respect of any kind and I won't do it just because I'll make people cry. I want you to face the evil treatment of gay people and women and anyone not in the same religious club you are in. Read your Bible: it is full of barbaric behavior..
marksmith46 4 months ago
@marksmith46 You're more hateful to Christians than they've ever been to gays. Don't look now, but you're the one ill-treating people.
jkirk1626 3 months ago
I feel more sorry for Elizabeth who, so reluctant to avoid Mary's death, was deeply troubled about the event.
qwertyasdaz 8 months ago
@qwertyasdaz Elizabeth I knew she signed the death warrant. She knew her Cousin was a threat to her life. She HAD to put on a good show of grieving because she knew the execution of her cousin was an act of War. Monarchs too were supposed to be above such Courts and sentences - she was the first Monarch ever to be sentenced to Death. And it was her COUSIN. I'm sure she also had thoughts that she will burn in hell for killing her own blood relative.
WinterHaven 4 months ago
Elizabeth put off Mary's execution for as long as she could. Even after her revealed involvment in the Ridolfi and Throckmorton plot, Mary was spared by Elizabeth despite the desires of all her closest councillers such as Cecil, Leicester and Walsigham. Mary's involvment in the Babington plot left Elizabeth with no other choice: as long as Mary was alive, even despite imprisonment, she posed a threat to Elizabeth that the English Queen simply could not risk.
qwertyasdaz 8 months ago
For all the deaths she caused, her execution was well-deserved. If to be a Catholic you have to kill for your church there is no way, I could ever be a Catholic. But with the cry from the Roman Catholic Church "One True Church" they want all of Christendom to come back to their fold to a church which has put idols on the altar and a pope who kissed the Koran. But Protestants are forever anathema But priests who molest children are not anathema.
courag1 9 months ago
@courag1 You can blame her Guise relatives for that, they were fanatics. Mary was actually far more tolerant than they were.
InnateNobility 8 months ago
@InnateNobility When you compare her and her ilk to the numbers once Protestants decided they wanted to live that they killed to stop the vileness of the RCC, the Inquisition, you can never show the numbers because they don't exist.
The only place you can find more barbarism is in Islam.
courag1 8 months ago
she was the mother of James I of england wasn't she?
takahashiwongwong 9 months ago
@takahashiwongwong No, that was King James VI King of Scots who took over the English throne and became King James I of England too.
segano1 7 months ago
EVIDENTLY MARY WAS INDEED EXTREAMLY STUPID...... ELIZABETH THE SPIDER SIMPLY HAD TO INVITE HER AS A GUEST AND THE FLY TOOK THE BAIT ALONG WITH THE HEADSMEN'S AX..... THIS PROVES A LOW I.Q. AS WELL AS DARWIN'S THEORY !
LilChuckyWoodenHead 10 months ago
@LilChuckyWoodenHead YOU KNOW WHAT? YOUR STUPID! ELIZABETH WAS MEAN TO HER AND MARY DIDN'T ACTUALLY WANT TO EXECUTE HER DEAR COUSIN! HER IDEA WAS ACTUALLY TO DEAL WITH ELIZABETH!
absolutePeachy4uLOL 7 months ago
Does anyone has the song? I cannot find it over the internet. I'd be pleased if someone will be kind enough to send it by e-mail.
thiagoblanco 10 months ago
and yet again, religion poisons everything.
volound 10 months ago 14
I am part of mary queen of scots familly And i am proud
jesepy13 11 months ago
@jesepy13 Yeah, and im the queen of sheeba. STFU.
SwiminFish4U 10 months ago
who cares.
WinterHaven 4 months ago
@jesepy13 Royal families are creepy because they are the products of incest, something people do to dogs and call them "pedigree". Incest is incest and it's disgusting.
WinterHaven 4 months ago
I agree, Simon Schama really does a good job with this entire series! Try watching the full episode.
Aorenai 1 year ago
Holy crap did ANYONE die of natural causes back then??
marksmith46 1 year ago 23
@marksmith46 I know right... like damn! the medieval period was full of violence... like damn!
Aleksei5055 7 months ago
@marksmith46 Many. But a lot of people died of natural causes quite young. Getting a scratch and dying of the resulting infection could happen quite easily.
peri2502 6 months ago
@marksmith46 yes, for the vast majority of people ( subjects in england ) life was nasty, brutish and short with an average life expectancy of about 27 years old. most children born died before the age of 5 of communicable diseases. just remember there was no modern medical care and the theory of the time was that diseases were caused by miasmas or bad air.
SocratesTheGadfly 4 months ago
@marksmith46 Most people died around age 40 back then due to lack of sanitation and harsh living conditions.
WinterHaven 4 months ago
@WinterHaven Oh look. You say age 40, SocratestheGadfly says 27. Anyway, I'm 51, not 12: I know stuff too. I read that many people died back then of having no sense of humor: please save yourselves before it's too late.
marksmith46 4 months ago
@marksmith46 How am I supposed to know your educational level or age-you posted a question and I answered it. and if you think I'm going to look at every single poster's main page you are gravely mistaken.
WinterHaven 4 months ago
@WinterHaven Behaving gravely is part of your problem. You need to learn to recognize facetious and/or rhetorical questions. I have a feeling you just like to lord your knowledge over other people so you can feel grand. Good God you must be fun at parties.
marksmith46 4 months ago
wow.... he missed her neck and hit her head with the sword, then her lips are still quivering, and a wig? unforgetableeeeee
jumperchu 1 year ago
Murder is murder. It took 15 minutes for her to die. Many people romatize this era but in reality it truly was the dark ages, primitive, barbaric, cruel, harsh and nightmarish.
I was in nursing - and have seen violent deaths - people who say this is just the way it was have no empathy nor can comprehend this atrocious act. Elizabeth, like all the monarchs were and still are heartless lizards. Mary had to be murdered so Elizabeth could get the crown. A kingdom built on blood and bones.
ofcelticblood 1 year ago
@ofcelticblood You seem to be overlooking the fact that it was already Elizabeth' s crown and had been for 30 years. Elizabeths reign was actually far LESS bloody than most. Whats more, had Mary succeeded in wresting the crown then it would indeed have been a 'kingdom built on blood and bones' - that of the 1000s who'd have died in the inevitable sectarian civil war. Mary, didn't seem troubled by this ..
flerb 7 months ago
Fancy taking a dog to an execution!
nicedog1 1 year ago 2
@nicedog1 LOL
marksmith46 4 months ago
Strange but not surprising hearing the account of Mary from an English perspective (don't expect objectivity).
AlbaSiar 1 year ago
Mary was not Queen of France for long; she was widowed on 5 December 1560. Mary then returned to Scotland, arriving in Leith on 19 August 1561. Four years later, she married her first cousin, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley. Their union was unhappy and in February 1567, there was a huge explosion at their house, and Darnley was found dead, apparently strangled, in the garden.
She soon married James Hepburn, 4th Earl of Bothwell, who was generally believed to be Darnley's murderer.
NOBLE SCUM ALL
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995 products of incest - what else do you expect from their lechery
WinterHaven 4 months ago
MY project is about mary Queen of scots my teachers name is Mrs. Darragh i am 9 u no
rollingthunder67 1 year ago
@rollingthunder67 and you're too young for this site, at least to be a member. the age limit is 13, why are you only 9, and allowed to be a member?
but i think it was a good idea to go on youtube for your history lesson. i did the same, when we spoke about the dieger death here in sweden for history.
SasukeFirefan 1 year ago
shit
ferdousselolo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fuckin idiot coudnt cut a womans head by a single stroke.They didnt even give her a decent strike-death...
MrMethadrine 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrMethadrine 1 year ago
Gruesome execution.
RandyAKing 1 year ago
AMEN.
karenofbethany 1 year ago
How come they are all really ugly on their paintings?
Tokiohotelgirl97 1 year ago
@Tokiohotelgirl97 I've often wondered that - but how many of those portraits actually look like real living people? If you observe contemporary paintings of castles and animals etc many don't look lifelike either - seems there was very limited knowledge of perspective for a start.
flerb 7 months ago
Unknown, Simon Schama's documentary series; A History Of Britain, which this clip was taken from, is one of the best overviews of British history ever produced and is extremely balanced and fair, the first part of this episode is spent detailing the catholic plots to overview Elizabeth and how these were uncovered, yet she still kept Mary alive and treated her more like a guest than a prisoner. This clip is from Episode 7.
mckinneyhunts 1 year ago
Unknown, Simon Schama's documentary series; A History Of Britain, which this clip was taken from, is one of the best overviews of British history ever produced and is extremely balanced and fair, the first part of this episode is spent detailing the catholic plots to overview Elizabeth and how these were uncovered, yet she still kept Mary alive and treated her more like a guest than a prisoner. This clip is from Episode 7
mckinneyhunts 1 year ago
Dang did he have to call her life pathetic. I would say tragic not pathetic.
dewhite001 1 year ago
One truth continues today. The setting up of a person to be a target. To receive all the insults of the unhappy demon possessed masses who are unaware of their inflictions done to them by the very puppet masters who set up kings, queens, presidents and all manner of scapegoats. The world hasn't changed much. Same character types calling the shots. Morons gorging on media's lying control. Few see the works of the controllers. Same old patterns no plot variety. Only variety in human design.
Nueroactive 1 year ago
Mary, Queen of Scots, everything would have been different with you.
sw8074 1 year ago
@sw8074 Yes. It would have been a disaster. Mary didn't have the brains to rule; she was kicked out of Scotland after only a few years.
happybkwrm 11 months ago
And we had a wii, a music room, an art room, a pool, a gym and lots of other stuff. But back in Mary/Elizabeth's time, they had NOTHING even close to that. ANd after all that, she forgave the executioner, died with honor, and she bared all of the people's insults with a strong heart. I have to say I'm actually proud of her, regardless of what people at the time thought of her and her (catholicism). RIP Mary, you deserve it, Elizabeth as well. They had both made history in their own way.
unknownXbeing 1 year ago
I hate how the historian talks like he was on the defensive of one side and looked like he didn't care Mary died. I'm not saying that he should be on Mary's side, but he should at leats have a bit of sympathy in his voice for Mary's death. Back in those days, it was extremely difficult to live long and live from your beliefs; you had to follow one's religion to be accepted and live.
unknownXbeing 1 year ago 21
Comment removed
ofcelticblood 1 year ago
@unknownXbeing She would have done better to show a little common sense instead of marching to her death like a determined martyr. She could have gone to France after escaping Scotland; did she really think Elizabeth would hand her an army after she'd refused to give up her "claim" to the English throne? Right.
happybkwrm 11 months ago
@unknownXbeing
Actually, Mary was knowingly involved with the Babington Plot, a plot to kill Elizabeth and put Mary on the throne, which was the reason she was executed. That, and during this period of English history, executions of powerful people were not uncommon: it seems barbaric today, but the people of Tudor England were surrounded by execution all the time, and families often watched members sent to the block; you can't judge history by a modern mindset fairly. It has to be in context.
LizzytheRhetoric 11 months ago
@unknownXbeing sympathy? mary tried to kill her own cousin over religion! elizabeth didn't even want to have her killed but the bitch was crazy.
froggymicwop 10 months ago
@froggymicwop She might have been, but at least the historian should not choose a side for the documentary. It lacks professionnalism.
unknownXbeing 8 months ago
@unknownXbeing That's because he's a typical Engaylish cunt.
segano1 7 months ago
@segano1 I wouldn't go as far as to be racist.
unknownXbeing 7 months ago
@unknownXbeing Since when was English a race?
segano1 7 months ago
@segano1 Since the time civilisations began to hate each other's throats for being from another culture. It's being racist towards a culture.
unknownXbeing 7 months ago
@unknownXbeing So England has a culture?
segano1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@segano1 Do you spend your entire life being anti english?
lolatmyaccounts 5 months ago
@unknownXbeing I'm not saying that it would be better if anyone would just give in to a fight when they can't win, but the point of my comment was to share my pov on how Mary felt. For when I observe a fight, I look at both sides. And on Mary's side, well, let's just say it wasn't fortunate. I mean, how would anybody like to be imprisoned for 20 years, raped and have an entire nation hate your guts? Regardless of what her emprisonment was for, I still respect her for her patience on that part.
unknownXbeing 7 months ago
@unknownXbeing Face it every proper Englishman, was taught to hate Mary Of Scotland. If Elizabeth, (a known cunning actress, as suited her politics), was in a "tear" over her cousin's death is in part due to the fact that she may have set a presidence for her own execution/murder someday. Think about it, the governmental head ordering the death of a queen?
molarmama5 7 months ago
@molarmama5 I agree, though, it is believed that the parliament ordered Mary's execution without Elizabeth's absolute consent. There is much to be said about the complexity of that period of time between the two Queens. Absolutely.
TWIGBOYS4 6 months ago
@unknownXbeing He was not fair at all. Though everything he spoke of was true, it was not in the harsh way that he speaks of it. There was too much going on to just call it pathetic, though, from a rational outlook it seems that way.
TWIGBOYS4 6 months ago
@unknownXbeing l think he did. but Liz was was the boss.
NeedleFactoryTube 6 months ago
Mary's is so sad only if she had lived in a better time or
SaveChinaTiger 1 year ago
My sister-in-law is a descendant of an illegitimate relative of hers. She looks SO much like her!
TheCoddlefish 1 year ago
wasnt henry notorious for beheading his wives was this just another example of henrys wife beheadings was this another example of as they say on the tv series the good wife silently marching to the executioner with nomistep no wimper accepting your fate without a inkle of a struggle what did they pay marys benefactors what did they promise how many men must die before the truth finally bleeds from the cross the exact truth will never be known let the dead rest they stink up the joint say confusi
ghostman3331 1 year ago
From what I believe the royal family are desendants from the tribe of Dan in the Bible. The tribe of Dan can be lead back to King David. The tribe of Dan left God for following pagan ways. They only pretend to be protestants. People who follow God wouldn't execute let alone treat others horribly because they are catholics. Is this what Jesus would do absolutely not.
midwest26 1 year ago
This is very awful I cried when I read about what happened to her. She wasn't well liked for being a catholic, giving money to the citizens rather than give it to the rich, and the royal family. Imagine having to die like this, and people complain about what we have in the states. Queen Elizabeth doesn't even deserve that title she is a murderer. England royalty sucks its just a bunch of greedy people who are never satisfied.
midwest26 1 year ago
I don't want to see this it's too horrible and ugly (no offence) xP
JaeDizzley1995 1 year ago
I've heard it said that Elizabeth 1st and mary queen of scots share the same tomb.
.....her infernal scots/french cousin paining her(elizabeth) even in death!!
badmattam 1 year ago
mfkrs scared to talk to me operation kill mary traction ab 1 subslash b applies coming in on a paraxectanjent b coaurse code mary target aguired from 2k milllion miles coming in on direct 1kmil miles parsect b respond target aguired fire target decending direct hit code green
ghostman3331 1 year ago
nobody has to do anything your trying to tell me he did it but didnt want to every executioner is there because he likes his job every crackpot in town lines up for the job and they even do it for free why did he hold the head up everybody saw what they all came to see a gory murder things like this set back the evolution of man for 100s of yrs
ghostman3331 1 year ago
@ghostman3331 Executioners were bound to their craft and position. If the king or queen commanded it then it had to be done. It's like with us now: we have to work for a living, even though we may sometimes hate our job. His own feelings did not matter in the case. Also, executions were viewed as social gatherings. It was the place to be and the act to see, especially if someone of high power or royalty was to be executed because it would inevitably be historically significant.
souverignofsilence 1 year ago
@souverignofsilence so your saying the exocutioner was part of a secret society with free home free food free money and was a silent royalty in england knowone knowing who they were traveling among city living next door to wealthy business men unknown livin the easy life except for the nagging consious knowing what theve done thats low and selling yourself out
ghostman3331 1 year ago
@ghostman3331 Nope, that's what you're saying. True, being an executioner took a heavy blow of one's position amidst society. They had to deal with people despising them, rioting against them and their families and not to mention the psychological effects of doing the deed. In fact, many committed suicide in the end: that's how bad it got. But it was job in the end and they were paid for their services. The victims themselves had to pay before their execution.
souverignofsilence 1 year ago
@souverignofsilence so you saying poor me the executioner everone ridicules me yeah no wonder people hated them like this dude held her head high for everone to see he got off on it no wonder people despised his sadistic ass who cares if he was psycologically disturbed after the fact the fact is he got off on it he was a pervert and probably a serrial killer of that time traveling the streets killing and jack the ripper got the blame defend the executioner if you want im saying he was a murderer
ghostman3331 1 year ago
@ghostman3331 Certainly, he is a murderer. He carried out the act. But did he want to do it? Did he enjoy it? No one can affirmably say. He most certainly can't speak for himself, nor can the eyewitness accounts or historical records vouch for your interpretation of the executioners character. As for holding the head to the crowd the act was customary during the time, especially if the victim was of noble blood or formerly in power. It was a sort of tangible example of the King and Gods will.
souverignofsilence 1 year ago
@souverignofsilence somewhere in the world there is a piece of paper hid in a safe along with other forbidden knowledge probably in the vatican the name of the executioner dont get me wrong i really dont care what his name is maybe this forbidden knowledge is best kept locked up but see i dont even know why she was executed in the first place something about her being a traitor but what are the facts did she really deserve to die if it was today or can we say it would be a cold blooded murder
ghostman3331 1 year ago
@ghostman3331 Now that's a far more interesting theory! :) Mary Stuart posed as a threat to the English throne. Many believed that she was the rightful heir to the English crown because Henry VIII's marriage to Anne Boleyn wasn't recognized as lawful by the Catholic church and therefore Elizabeth's birth was considered illegitimate. Her death, unjustifiable as it was, was for political purposes only.
souverignofsilence 1 year ago
@souverignofsilence what about this then could the catholic church have ordered her execution and what was their reason for her ex-communication through illagitamacy was henry 8 already married to another woman when he married anne i thought he had many wives so why didnt the catholic church recognize the marriage was the catholic church in too cozy with elizabeth and didnt want change and somehow spin the execution into martyrdom how can the church order an execution and make martre same time
ghostman3331 1 year ago
@ghostman3331 Henry proclaimed himself the head of the church of England, which was a big "No, no" for the Catholic Church. As such, he could easily secure his divorce from Catherine and marry Anne without the need of the church's permission. This is what spearheaded the break from Rome and the Reformation. The Catholic Church did not order Mary's execution at all. She was a Catholic: if anything, they wanted her to succeed the throne of England and shift the Reformation back.
souverignofsilence 1 year ago
gosh that must of hurt....with the 1st blow was she still alive or did she die?
TheBrennabob 1 year ago
@TheBrennabob She was mostly likely still alive.
souverignofsilence 1 year ago
the executioner is in hell and mary is head torturer getting payback
ghostman3331 1 year ago
@ghostman3331 i think he had to do it. i dont think it was his fault. i
ChristineScholz 1 year ago
a second stroke?
it must of been really painful for Mary
MoThEr04LiFe 1 year ago
oh yeah i forgot thanks
keithabarron 1 year ago
um i feel bad but she was bloody mary lol
keithabarron 1 year ago
@keithabarron Just FYI... Bloody Mary was Mary, the daughter of Catherine of Aragon and Henry VII...
Mary Stuart... was the scot queen... and the rival of Queen Elizabeth the first.
singingheart62 1 year ago
@keithabarron different mary
DeaconLee 1 year ago
@keithabarron mary for england and mary for scotland scoland was better
IAmAwesome2209 1 year ago
i feel so bad for Mary
eidius1989 1 year ago
II Samuel 7:16 "And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.' ' ' "
duchesseagle404 1 year ago
There are three subject spoken of here, they are the house, the kingdom and the throne. From the time of David all three of these things have been in existence, and they will continue until this earth age is over. Why? Because God established them and He protects them.
duchesseagle404 1 year ago
II Samuel 7:17 "According to all these words, and according to all this vision, so did Nathan speak unto David."
duchesseagle404 1 year ago
Nathan told David all the words of the vision exactly as God revealed it to him. Though David meant well, the idea was not in accordance with the plan of God, and the desires of God. The lesson here though again, is that we should always seek instruction from God first in matters that pertain to Him. Ask and ye shall receive, seek and it will be known to you the will of God in the matter.
duchesseagle404 1 year ago
II Samuel 7:18 "Then went king David in, and sat before the Lord, and he said, "Who am I, O Lord God? and what is my house, that thou hast brought me hitherto?"
duchesseagle404 1 year ago
After the Prophet spoke to David, he was humbled before the Lord. Stop and think for a moment what this promise meant. David's children will always be a royal house and have a throne to sit upon. There will always be a nation and nations to govern, and it will be David's kids that will sit on those thrones. When you trace the thrones of all the kings of Europe back in their lineage, they all come from the seed of David. Think about it.
duchesseagle404 1 year ago
Why hasn't the Catholic Church canonized this woman?
revaluator 1 year ago
Deep anough to split her head in two?
Aluenvey 1 year ago
@ligreekguy
The more I learn about the XVIth century and afterwards, the more I tend to agree with you (about the number of Protestant and Catholic martyrs, under a ruler of the other persuasion).
Being raised in the Catholic faith (but no longer recognizing the authority of the pope, cardinals and bishops, etc.), I sense however that some places where Protestant formed the majority (Netherlands, New Amsterdam, etc.) were relatively more tolerant than the Catholic ones.
legato699 1 year ago
Said Mary: "Ye interpret the Scriptures in one manner, and they [the Roman Catholic teachers] interpret in another; whom shall I believe, and who shall be judge?" {GC 251.1} "Ye shall believe God, that plainly speaketh in His word," answered the Reformer;"and farther than the word teaches you, ye neither shall believe the one nor the other. The word of God is plain in itself; and if there appear any obscurity in one place, the Holy Ghost,... explains the same more clearly in other places
otnt66 1 year ago
yeh but...god doesn't exsist.
needabloodyname 1 year ago
How do you truly arrive at such a simplistic conclusion without checking out the facts? What facts, you may well ask? Let's just put aside all the thee's and thou's of the bible, and just objectively look at just ONE of it's claims of historical note. The life, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN PROPHECIES MADE BY PEOPLE CENTURIES BEFORE EXPLAINING IN DETAIL this man's life. This man who said that he was God in the flesh. Unlike any other. Psalms 53:1
otnt66 1 year ago
You are calling me simplistic when you believe in a magic invisible man in the sky!!!! Also.....do you really think you are going to prove any point by quoting from teh fucking Bible....the most popular publication of bullshit in history. Just accept that life is meaningless, nothing happens when you die and start enjoying the time you have.
needabloodyname 1 year ago
Your judgement is clouded. Nevertheless, historical facts are facts, whether you or I choose to understand their significance or not. Only TRUTH prevails in the end. Look around you, everything else falls away. Jesus Christ makes some profound claims, like "I am the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE. No man comes to the FATHER but by ME." This man in history made it possible for you to live forever and ever and ever, if you accept him. CHECK OUT THE FACTS.
otnt66 1 year ago
Elizabeth whore.
aliceagnese 1 year ago
god bless queen elizabeth 1 of england
kevinkards1 1 year ago
I am so proud to be Greek Orthodox and a descendant of the Byzantine Empire. The latter was a multi-national entity that practiced tolerance of all faiths (Jews held high academic and commercial positions, Muslims and other Christians were likewise prominent). Protestant monarchs were no better than their Catholic counterparts: the roster of Catholic martyrs under Protestant rulers is nearly as long as the roster of Protestant martyrs under Catholic rulers.
ligreekguy 1 year ago
you do make a good point.
evaperonfan 1 year ago
The more I learn about the XVIth century and afterwards, the more I tend to agree with you (about the number of Protestant and Catholic martyrs, under a ruler of the other persuasion).
Being raised in the Catholic faith (but no longer recognizing the authority of the pope, cardinals and bishops, etc.), I sense however that some places where Protestant formed the majority (Netherlands, New Amsterdam, etc.) were relatively more tolerant than the Catholic ones.
legato699 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The more I learn about the XVIth century and afterwards, the more I tend to agree with you (about the number of Protestant and Catholic martyrs, under a ruler of the other persuasion).
Being raised in the Catholic faith (but no longer recognizing the authority of the pope, cardinals and bishops, etc.), I sense however that some places where Protestant formed the majority (Netherlands, New Amsterdam, etc.) were relatively more tolerant than the Catholic ones.
legato699 1 year ago
the commentater has a bastard nose
jasontristramroberts 1 year ago
The singer is Sarah Leonard singing John Harle's version of The Three Ravens. It's available on John Harles' album entitled "Terror and Magnificence." It is also available on the soundtrack for this series "A History of Britain"
bluenotenyc 2 years ago
Thank you : )
azoressinger 2 years ago
I know the song is called The Three Ravens but does anyone know the singer??? Thanks : )
azoressinger 2 years ago
I know this makes me sound bad...but when are you gona put the song alone? please please please ;(
it's so darn beautifulll
CrazyGrin 2 years ago
There was blood lust as this regicide was applicable to QE1, & QE1 knew all the facts.
Further QE1's Virgin Queen status was now bloody, with the judicial murder of a catholic martyr; the mother of the next King of England; James 1st.
Mary of Scots execution was needless; she could have been skipped in the succession, allowed to see her son, & otherwise lead a very watched life in either nunnery, or court, in a guilded cage.
Quite the trophy, the head of a fellow anointed prince.
Hkepfer 2 years ago
yes that may be all well and good in the "enlightend" age of POST MODERN reasoning, however you must put yourself into the late 16th century world of england of that time. the execution of mary was necessary due to her treasonous behavior. treason is a very serious crime and it was RIGHTLY done just as the execution of julius and ethel rosenberg was JUST and RIGHT!!
SocratesTheGadfly 2 years ago
come on, execution of a woman who was plotting against her? Besides, if MQOS had been queen of England, England never would have become a world power. I shudder to think where progress, Anglo Saxon society and women's status would be without Elizabeth.
evaperonfan 2 years ago
@evaperonfan do you say always the same??? Mary Stuart was anglosaxon too!!! hello!!!! and if the women had best treaty in anglosaxon countries why Victoria can`t rule in Hannover?
answer me, please...I`m just a very retarded latin man ..remember in latin american we live in the neolitic age yet...
astrofabio68 1 year ago
Don't be naive: Mary alive was a threat to Elizabeth and Protestant England - someone was always trying to use her as the focus of a rebellion. And Elizabeth was on the horns of a real dilemma, because Mary's execution created a presedent for killing an annointed monarch which could be used even to get rid of her, and was used by Cromwell 60 years later to execute Charles I. - There are no cut and dried answers in politics, and Mary was definately a political animal. Just an unsuccessful one.
TheShirEl 1 year ago
@Hkepfer James didn't WANT her back. He refused to accept a deal that would have freed her because it also set her up as co-ruler of Scotland. And Mary refused a deal that would have left her off the throne. She actually wrote a will leaving her "right to the English throne" to Phillip of Spain because her son was a Protestant.
Elizabeth kept Mary alive for 19 years; most monarchs would have killed her the minute she rode into their country, let alone throughout many plots to overthrow her.
happybkwrm 1 year ago
@happybkwrm Mary did no such thing as to disinherit James, no document has EVER been found stating she did, when her time came to die she went bravely and full of dignity. Mary LOVED James despite his neglect because he was brought up to hate her tbh and Mary went to death peacefully instead of spitefully disinheriting her only child. Eliabeth would never have killed Mary immediately because she would have had spain and france on her in a second if she done it without reason.
hayleyshikari 1 year ago
@hayleyshikari
What is interesting, however, is that after he became King of England, James ordered the remains of Mary to be transferred to Westminster Abbey and to be given a fairly elaborate interment ceremony. I suppose that when he reached adulthood and was able to discern opinions for himself, he realized this was his mother, and that despite her schemings (who did NOT scheme among the European royals), she made it possible for him to rule over two kingdoms.
ligreekguy 1 year ago
@hayleyshikari Read Antonia Fraser's bio of Mary Stuart. Mary condemned her son strongly. She wrote to Phillip of Spain, giving him her "rights" to the English throne.
And no one in France or Spain cared about Mary herself. Phillip just used her death as an excuse to invade England - AFTER she was executed. No one in Spain or France cared about Mary herself. Even the English Catholics used her as a symbol. She would have been a puppet ruler; she'd proven she wasn't capable of ruling.
happybkwrm 1 year ago
@happybkwrm i have i bought it in Edinburgh castle gift shop :) and it says on page 684 *But Phillip was allowing himself to be deluded. Although Mary had twice confided England conditionally to Phillip, if James failed to become a catholic -in her will her will of 1577 and her letters to Mendoza of 1586- no cluase existed in the last testament which Mary made on the eve of her death in Fotheringhay, and no other will has been found supporting his claims. In any case it is clear from -
hayleyshikari 1 year ago
@hayleyshikari I check. Fine, she didn't put it in her final will. But she did try to disinherit him and "give" England to Phillip II, which shows how out of reality she was; England was never hers to give.
"On the same date (May 20, 1586), as if to prove her lack of contact with reality Mary also wrote to Mendoza in Paris confiding her rights to the crown of England conditionally to his master Phillip II if James had not become a Catholic by the date of her death."
happybkwrm 1 year ago
@happybkwrm contemporary accounts Mary went to her death serenely, rather than in a bitter mood which may have led to a official last-minute disinheritance of her son.* On the page after it said James sent one of his mothers servants to fetch his wife as a reward that would have been seen as a great honor to go fetch the new Queen. Anyway if E had immediately chopped of Mary's head that would have caused trouble because she would have had no reason monarchs did not do that at the time.
hayleyshikari 1 year ago
@hayleyshikari
That's quite a generalisation you've made about the English. Quite racist infact. Oh what a surprise.... you must be from Scotland? If that were said about other races there would be an outcry.
You are a racist.
yallapilko 1 year ago
@yallapilko sorry your right because i extremely offensive and horrible to english people for saying they dislike mary queen of scots, shame i could be nick griffins kid. im such a racist :|
hayleyshikari 1 year ago