In the classic, the mountains in the background were more "3D" to me, but the foreground was fuzzy, which can happen depending on the camera angle, which can't really be help, at least I don't think so.
In the post processed, the background mountains seemed a little bit less "3D" to me, but the foreground was clearer. I'm not really a fan of post processed 3D because companies use it as a crutch to make more money, but this actually was ok. Great job! Looking forward to more videos.
@vaasnaad The distortion was a little too less to match the same eye distance than in the first test. So it's easier to look at in exchange for less 3D depth. Apart from that, you should be able to achieve the same parallax with both approaches, but the post processing approach leads to some distortion artifacts. So this approach is actually the worse. If you try to look at the first test from a greater distance, you might get a better 3D impression.
I have a question for one of my subscribers: did this video appear on your frontpage, after I made it public? I ask because I uploaded it as a private video first.
you can see it without 3d monitor or anything if you can squint with your eyes :O
StableJJ 2 months ago
In the classic, the mountains in the background were more "3D" to me, but the foreground was fuzzy, which can happen depending on the camera angle, which can't really be help, at least I don't think so.
In the post processed, the background mountains seemed a little bit less "3D" to me, but the foreground was clearer. I'm not really a fan of post processed 3D because companies use it as a crutch to make more money, but this actually was ok. Great job! Looking forward to more videos.
HholyDiver42 1 year ago
I thought post was MUCH better.
vaasnaad 1 year ago
@vaasnaad The distortion was a little too less to match the same eye distance than in the first test. So it's easier to look at in exchange for less 3D depth. Apart from that, you should be able to achieve the same parallax with both approaches, but the post processing approach leads to some distortion artifacts. So this approach is actually the worse. If you try to look at the first test from a greater distance, you might get a better 3D impression.
NionsChannel 1 year ago
I have a question for one of my subscribers: did this video appear on your frontpage, after I made it public? I ask because I uploaded it as a private video first.
NionsChannel 1 year ago
@NionsChannel Yep, worked for me
Jasonhalo0 1 year ago
@Jasonhalo0 Ok, good to know. I was afraid I would have to publish videos always immediately.
NionsChannel 1 year ago
do i need glasses for this?
ronstero 1 year ago
@ronstero depends on the 3D settings. You can also choose an other display mode to watch it cross eyed.
NionsChannel 1 year ago
It works fine. But you loose some of the depth you get with "classic stereoscopy"..
MrCHISOL 1 year ago
Sorry for bad english
A little difficult to watch.
But otherwise wonderful.
Best seen text in the black background :)
AsMazasDebeselis 1 year ago