@dipmvideos I looked at that but it doesn't work for full frame sensors. I'm gettng a vivitar 7mm but I want something less wide aswell. Do you know anything about the 35mm f/2 or the 28mm 1.8?
@dipmvideos yeah but when I upgrade to a 5dmk2 later I would have to sell that lens. but I could always sell it to help pay for the 5d. I just didn't know if their was better choices then the 10-20
@skatepreme i have a t2i with me right now so i might post a video with it using this lens soon. if you are gonna get a lens for a crop camera, i think the tokina is a better option.
@skatepreme you should really buy for the stuff you have right now. you never know when you'll be upgrading. if you dont wanna lose money, buy used and sell it for the exact same price when you're done using it.
@krazy4baja If on a 7D, I honestly just go with the f/1.4 USM for a 50mm. But the common lenses that work great are the 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II USM. A 16-35mm f/2.8 USM II works great as well, but you should look at some of the primes from the L lenses too :) I've read on a few sites that the 50mm f/1.2L is only sharp (nicely sharp that is) at apertures smaller than 1.2.. but most people would go with the 1.4 USM and save the extra $1400 :)
So will a crop camera take the full picture that you're looking through the viewfinder or will it come out when printed on photo paper cutting part of the picture out that you seen through the viewfinder and reviewed on the camera screen
Thanks for the info. I have a 7d and will consider this lens when I have the money. Kinda disapointed that the 7d is a crop camera as I did think it was full frame. Just got confused with the viewfinder being 100% compared to 96 or so % of other viewfinders on other cameras but that's ok.
thanks man!that's a great review of this lens!im totally convinced to buy this lens on my 7d!i already got the 100mmf2.8L on my camera and the IQ is really way better compare to a non-L lenses..cheers!
Hey man - thanks for the video - I am stuck for a choice between canon 17-40 L F/4 and Sigma 17-50 F/2.8 Image stabilised lens - in low light situation with IS and a F/2.8 the sigma would be pretty awesome - but on the other hand Canon L series with the sweet spot would be pretty sweet and it doesnt extend when zooming in or out (sigma does quite a bit). Sigma sharpness is meant to be good as well - both are in the similar price range - your comments? Thanks in advance. I have a T3i.
I primarily shoot with a 5D II, and am a professional conservation photographer. I wanted a lightweight camera for extremely strenuous hikes/climbs and I thought my 17-40 would be a great fit on a t3i. As you've pointed out, it works fabulously on crop sensor. Great build quality, super sharp, and for what you get, not too heavy or bulky. Some are saying otherwise on the web. For the record, they are totally full of it. This lens is totally sweet on a crop body.
@SupremeCleric still the same. i mean, its an f4 lens. I'm asking how dark it would be to know if f4 would be fast enough. The rest is really about ISO. if youre talking about grain and stuff, that's dependent on the camera, not the lens. So IQ in low light depends on the body.
Sorry to disagree, but I think there are better normal zoom lenses for crop cameras in the same (and lower) price range. Canon 15-85 3.5-5.6 IS, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS or Tamron/Sigma(not sure about the sigma) 17-50 2.8 VC/OS for example. With these lenses you'll get image stabilization, better focal length range and in some of those lenses f/2.8. Also the hood on 17-40 looses a lot of it's effect with a crop sensor.
@Samgy1 i also forgot to mention another reason why people look to buy the L series. a lot of people dont like buying twice, and so they buy full frame lanses just in case they decide to upgrade their body in the future. sure, you can sell lenses and buy new ones, but you usually lose some money in the process. i do however completely agree in you saying that there better options from crop cameras. the 17-55 surely is a beast. the build quality doesnt match that of an L lens though.
@dipmvideos I agree with you on these things. None of the lenses I recommended can match an L in build quality. I know there are plenty of people thinking the way you suggested. I just think one should buy what's best for him now, 'cause lots of people will never do the upgrade to FF. Also the prize drop on lenses isn't that bad. Specially if you buy used lenses in the first place.
Hi nico! Got this lens but im not sure if its sharp enough or im just too picky. Can u send me a photo using your 17-40? Please.. Just need to compare it with mine. Thanks!
@dipmvideos Okay I think the build is pretty bad for 670 dollars.. and also the autofocus = complete shit. Like it hunts and doesn't know what it's doing. It back-focuses on my Xsi like all the time. I got it because of the 2.8 and O.S., but I literally feel like the O.S. isn't doing anything half the time. And it makes this horrible rattly noise which Sigma says is the O.S... but like It's so annoying. I HATE IT SO MUCH LOL.
Have you heard anything about the 28 f1.8 from Canon?
Thanks Nico, my brother have a t2i, and is looking for a lens like that but he wants to have aperture of f2.8 al least. I will refer him this video. Thanks.
would you recommend getting a 18-135 or the 17-40 l, upgrading from a 18-55 kit for everyday use?
playstationfreak2598 1 week ago
Comment removed
Mikae7 1 month ago
Comment removed
Mikae7 1 month ago
Comment removed
Mikae7 1 month ago
good video.. subscribed :)
HelloAndersBachmann 1 month ago
I think Canon`'s 17-55 2.8 and Sigma's 17-50 2.8 are better choices
for a walkaround lens on a APS-C Body. The 17-40 has only an Aperture
of 4 and no IS. It`s a good ultra wide for Full Frame but it's not that useful on a
APS-C Body.
SilentGuyX 2 months ago
could this be used as a wide angle for my t2i?
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme it wont be that wide. I'd look at the tokina 11-16 if you want a good wide angle lens for your t2i
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos I looked at that but it doesn't work for full frame sensors. I'm gettng a vivitar 7mm but I want something less wide aswell. Do you know anything about the 35mm f/2 or the 28mm 1.8?
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme i used the 28 recently and its pretty good.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos would you suggest it for a wide angle lens?
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme it's almost a 50mm equivalent on that. It's not wide at all.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos True. What would suggest I get? I'm looking for something similar to the sigma 10-20
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme why dont you get the sigma?
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos it only works on crop sensors
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme aren't you using a t2i?
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos yeah but when I upgrade to a 5dmk2 later I would have to sell that lens. but I could always sell it to help pay for the 5d. I just didn't know if their was better choices then the 10-20
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme i have a t2i with me right now so i might post a video with it using this lens soon. if you are gonna get a lens for a crop camera, i think the tokina is a better option.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos yeah but if I'm buying a 700$ lens I'd rather have it work on full frame as well
skatepreme 2 months ago
@skatepreme you should really buy for the stuff you have right now. you never know when you'll be upgrading. if you dont wanna lose money, buy used and sell it for the exact same price when you're done using it.
dipmvideos 2 months ago
@dipmvideos That's true. I thought about the sigma 30mm but I saw the canon 35mm f/2 but like you said it almost a 50mm lens
skatepreme 2 months ago
What are good L lenses that will take awesome pics with a crop camera. Considering a 50mm L lens for my 7d as well . Will it work good with my 7d
krazy4baja 3 months ago
@krazy4baja If on a 7D, I honestly just go with the f/1.4 USM for a 50mm. But the common lenses that work great are the 24-70mm f/2.8L USM and the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS II USM. A 16-35mm f/2.8 USM II works great as well, but you should look at some of the primes from the L lenses too :) I've read on a few sites that the 50mm f/1.2L is only sharp (nicely sharp that is) at apertures smaller than 1.2.. but most people would go with the 1.4 USM and save the extra $1400 :)
BrandonKingVloggin 2 months ago
So will a crop camera take the full picture that you're looking through the viewfinder or will it come out when printed on photo paper cutting part of the picture out that you seen through the viewfinder and reviewed on the camera screen
krazy4baja 3 months ago
Thanks for the info. I have a 7d and will consider this lens when I have the money. Kinda disapointed that the 7d is a crop camera as I did think it was full frame. Just got confused with the viewfinder being 100% compared to 96 or so % of other viewfinders on other cameras but that's ok.
krazy4baja 3 months ago
Wow! You explained it right on. I've been looking for examples of full body and crop sensor cameras and you explained it well.
atonementpreset 3 months ago
At 2:08, did you say "crap" camera?
allahkimakichoot 4 months ago
thanks man!that's a great review of this lens!im totally convinced to buy this lens on my 7d!i already got the 100mmf2.8L on my camera and the IQ is really way better compare to a non-L lenses..cheers!
xoxomojo 5 months ago
Hey man - thanks for the video - I am stuck for a choice between canon 17-40 L F/4 and Sigma 17-50 F/2.8 Image stabilised lens - in low light situation with IS and a F/2.8 the sigma would be pretty awesome - but on the other hand Canon L series with the sweet spot would be pretty sweet and it doesnt extend when zooming in or out (sigma does quite a bit). Sigma sharpness is meant to be good as well - both are in the similar price range - your comments? Thanks in advance. I have a T3i.
harrysanghain 5 months ago
I primarily shoot with a 5D II, and am a professional conservation photographer. I wanted a lightweight camera for extremely strenuous hikes/climbs and I thought my 17-40 would be a great fit on a t3i. As you've pointed out, it works fabulously on crop sensor. Great build quality, super sharp, and for what you get, not too heavy or bulky. Some are saying otherwise on the web. For the record, they are totally full of it. This lens is totally sweet on a crop body.
soulfabric 7 months ago
how does this perform at night?
mingii 8 months ago
@mingii night? what do you mean? what kind of lighting would there be?
dipmvideos 8 months ago
@dipmvideos Not sure if this has already been cleared up, but he means IQ in low light settings.
SupremeCleric 5 months ago
@SupremeCleric still the same. i mean, its an f4 lens. I'm asking how dark it would be to know if f4 would be fast enough. The rest is really about ISO. if youre talking about grain and stuff, that's dependent on the camera, not the lens. So IQ in low light depends on the body.
dipmvideos 5 months ago
Ei nico, do you use this lens shooting people or for landscapes only? Very helpful vids u got here.
herb 9 months ago
@herb people too!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
Alright thank you!
herb 9 months ago
@herb no problem!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
Sorry to disagree, but I think there are better normal zoom lenses for crop cameras in the same (and lower) price range. Canon 15-85 3.5-5.6 IS, Canon 17-55 2.8 IS or Tamron/Sigma(not sure about the sigma) 17-50 2.8 VC/OS for example. With these lenses you'll get image stabilization, better focal length range and in some of those lenses f/2.8. Also the hood on 17-40 looses a lot of it's effect with a crop sensor.
Samgy1 9 months ago
@Samgy1 i also forgot to mention another reason why people look to buy the L series. a lot of people dont like buying twice, and so they buy full frame lanses just in case they decide to upgrade their body in the future. sure, you can sell lenses and buy new ones, but you usually lose some money in the process. i do however completely agree in you saying that there better options from crop cameras. the 17-55 surely is a beast. the build quality doesnt match that of an L lens though.
dipmvideos 9 months ago
@dipmvideos I agree with you on these things. None of the lenses I recommended can match an L in build quality. I know there are plenty of people thinking the way you suggested. I just think one should buy what's best for him now, 'cause lots of people will never do the upgrade to FF. Also the prize drop on lenses isn't that bad. Specially if you buy used lenses in the first place.
Samgy1 9 months ago
@Samgy1 all true! thanks for the input! people will really appreciate all of the things you mentioned! and thanks again for watching!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
Hi nico! Got this lens but im not sure if its sharp enough or im just too picky. Can u send me a photo using your 17-40? Please.. Just need to compare it with mine. Thanks!
herb 9 months ago
@herb check out the dumaguete set on my flickr page!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
what happened @ 3:00 you scared me hahaha. Great video =)
seanyyg 9 months ago
@seanyyg haha, i actually dont know why i looked to the right! :P
dipmvideos 9 months ago
Great Info! thx mate:D
13MattNick 9 months ago
@pgsyndrome thanks so much!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
ugh wish i got this instead of my p.o.s sigma 17-50.
gregztheshiz27 9 months ago
@gregztheshiz27 i never tried that lens. is it really that bad?
dipmvideos 9 months ago
@dipmvideos Okay I think the build is pretty bad for 670 dollars.. and also the autofocus = complete shit. Like it hunts and doesn't know what it's doing. It back-focuses on my Xsi like all the time. I got it because of the 2.8 and O.S., but I literally feel like the O.S. isn't doing anything half the time. And it makes this horrible rattly noise which Sigma says is the O.S... but like It's so annoying. I HATE IT SO MUCH LOL.
Have you heard anything about the 28 f1.8 from Canon?
gregztheshiz27 9 months ago
Thanks Nico, my brother have a t2i, and is looking for a lens like that but he wants to have aperture of f2.8 al least. I will refer him this video. Thanks.
spascalin 9 months ago
@spascalin no problem!
dipmvideos 9 months ago
@spascalin you should tell him about the 16-35mm 2.8 it is a great lens but a bit more expensive
DavidHeatonPhoto 9 months ago
@DavidHeatonPhoto yup, its a great lens.
dipmvideos 9 months ago
@DavidHeatonPhoto thanks I will tell him about it.
spascalin 9 months ago
holy shit, you have a good timing! I mean, I was just thinking about getting this lens tom and your review showed up!
snitchma02 9 months ago
@snitchma02 it seems like a lot of people want to get this lens! it was a conversation with a friend that inspired me to make this! haha
dipmvideos 9 months ago
@snitchma02 me too ;)
mathiasha 9 months ago
Thanks for review man.Good job
urbanfibua 9 months ago
@urbanfibua thanks!
dipmvideos 9 months ago