More evidence/impacts of climate change series...(please read my article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..
.
Wind farm opponents 'aided and abetted' by climate sceptic groups
.
The anti-wind farm movement that is gaining influence in the NSW Parliament is being ''aided and abetted'' by climate sceptic groups and some mining figures.
Evidence / impacts of climate change series...(read it before the denier with all the sock puppet channels censors it)...
.
Governor vows to prepare California for climate change
.
The United Nations' top climate official joined California Governor Jerry Brown on Thursday to call for renewed efforts in the state to more quickly adapt to the risks that extreme weather and a rising sea pose to agriculture and the coastline.
Man-made global warming is a joke. Those who promote it are wilful idiots or con artists.
CO2 emission is a consequence of heat rise, not the other way round. The main effector of heat change on earth is the SUN (duuuu!).
People who buy this crap seem to be rather ignorant of history. Read up on the medieval warm period, heat rise in no way means an end of the world as Al Gore would like you to think. Plants and wildlife love it.
CO2 emissions and heat rise positively reinforce one another. Rising temperatures cause the oceans to release sequestered CO2, which increases temperatures.
In the past, the sun has been responsible for the initial warming, but we know that CO2 can be just as effective an initial cause as the sun. It's the same process we've seen in the past, except that we've added another massive source of CO2 emissions.
@baigandine Oh yeah, historical precedent has no meaning to science... Pull the other one mate. Go read up on the scientific method and the importance of precedent and DATA. When you have a governing body who is capable of "forgetting" the medieval warm period just to further an agenda, you don't only have a big political problem, you have what is called a mindless mass of following zombies.
In what way would exporting your industry to China save the planet, pray? Please enlighten me here.
@1famekouby Historical evidence has relevance, but too often it's all people on your side bring. No. It usually comes with insane conspiracy theories. I'd like to see scientific data refuted with science. That's all. What you take this medieval warming period as proof as? That something else could cause global warming besides man? That doesn't really speak to the validity of manmade global warming. Obviously an effect can have more than one cause.
@baigandine "insane conspiracy theories", you mean along the lines of "the sun has little influence on climate change, the main responsible agent is a gas which composes 0,04% of the atmosphere and is one of the 4 building blocks of the life form known as humans"? Or other "insane conspiracy theories" like "exporting industry to the third world and taxing the first world will help against global warming".
Because when you strip down the arguments to the core principals, that is what they say.
@1famekouby Overwhelming consensus of scientists outweighs the fact that something may seem intuitively inaccurate. Many things which seem absurd are nevertheless scientifically true. "Truth is stranger than fiction" as they say. As for your policy argument, that's a whole other issue, and I can't say I necessarily disagree with you there. But that's no reason to doubt the science.
The glaciers on mars are melting because of our SUVs here! We've got to tax the world quickly otherwise we won't be able to save mother earth and mister gore won't be able to work his pyramid scheme! Quick quick tax us more please!
@1famekouby Actually the liberals want to tax YOU less, go cry to the party that IS taking all your money. The republicans and libertarians. How you guys can't see trough their bullshit is amazing. Bush cries terrorist and every republican voter are happily reaching for their wallet. Bush cried poor wall street is in trouble and what did you guys do, again happily gave him 700 billion$ so that he could give the money to his buddies.
You're getting screwed in the ass and you're begging for more.
@baldurus1 True. Bush was the first GOP president to wage war and not raise taxes to pay for military actions. He increased the size of the government more than any other Republican president prior.
You made this Video in 2008, but in 2010 You and many other Global Warming Alarmists were proven wrong and caught with your pants down ALTERING the DATA in YOUR FAVOR......Whattya got to say now you Bozo?
No one supports polluting, and we should try to reduce waste. But carbon tax is not the answer and won't help reduce CO2 one bit. Do your research folks and don't listen to these smug tv brats. Peace.
All I know is that CO2 tax is a scam and not one single document you can produce says CO2 is an imminent threat, because its not. Plastic in the ocean, sure, nuclear waste in the ocean, but not CO2. They have been trying to brainwash people into it to accept the proposed tax. I ask again how will cap and trade help the world as it seems that is what you support. Just answer the question.
@TheKickerboy99 Really? Alright I will produce several, if you want more I can give you more.
I will state upfront I obviously haven't had time to real all these but I have skimmed a few. Unlike your source these are both articles that support AGW and "skeptical" as well for ballence sake which you don't seem to think matter. Though it appears they had just as much trouble find decent sources as you did.
I would suggest you start with "CO2 effect is weak" 35 support AGW 3 against.
@Kingucktoad It is obvious you don't read them either, but I think anyone could tell the premise each is based on. It is not CO2, but the actual drivers of climate. Of course the climate changes, and of course the Earth is nearing the end of a long warming trend. No one has proven it is any different than any in the past, in fact the IPCC's own data shows it is at the same rate as past warming trends. If it can be shown that human produced CO2 is causing dangerous warming then I'm with you.
As a matter of fact I've read the first three. I even went as far as searching for scientific responses to the first one. But I stopped once I realized where you actually got them and that they didn't say what you thought they did so it was a waste of my time.
The reality is no scientist ANYWHERE from ANY discipline (and you can check this if you want) can account for the resent rise in temperatures without taking co2 into account they have just been too sharp too fast.
@Kingucktoad "We can't account for the lack of warming, and its a travesty that we can't" I say again, there has been no warming at all out of normal rises, further the last ten years warming has slowed greatly while CO2 rises at a steady rate. CO2 has never lead temps and never will.....ITS A SCAM YOU DOLT!
@Kingucktoad As I have tried to point out to you, but you seem oblivious to it, there has been no abnormal warming. In the last ten years warming has slowed, these cycles happen because of our travel through space, and cosmic rays vary our cloud cover. To say that raising a trace gas like CO2 from 365 ppm to 380ppm in 150 yrs has had any measurable change from normal is just not true.(measured data contradicts it) As I also said before, 10k years ago there was a mile of ice where I am now.
@TheKickerboy99 I love how science deniers like you love to create bizarro versions of scientific theories, and then vigorously attack these strawman positions that only exist in your own minds. If global warming speeds or slows...then science is wrong! If there was an ice age in the past...then science is wrong! WTF?!
I have never heard of any scientific theory on global warming that would be falsified by ice ages or fluctuations in warming. Maybe youre a renaissance man? Submit your paper!
@SammyHales Ok CO2 should and does cause some warming....you happy now? LOL I guess you guys keep missing my main point which is this. Taxing CO2 is a scam, it will not decrease its output, and will make zero difference in the world at all. Unless of course you support killing off most of the Earths population, CO2 will be produced in ever larger quantities. Changing to different energy sources will help lessen the production of CO2, but thats it, taxing it just makes AL Gore money.
@SammyHales Further, I guess the part that pisses me off about the whole AGW movement is the lies and deceit employed to gain this world wide tax. The whole idea was invented by Maurice Strong, hes a scam artist the likes of which the world has never seen. CO2 is not an imminent threat, it is a life gas on this planet. All of the information I have seen says that our global temps are more so controlled by the sun and cosmic rays forming clouds, sorry if that offends you.
@TheKickerboy99 In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, a paper reached the following conclusions: 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
@TheKickerboy99 The number of nationally and internationally recognized scientific organizations that support the IPCC view on global warming is too long to list here. It would take pages to do that. Conversely, do you want to take a guess at how many of them dissent from that view? Come close so I can whisper in your ear...the answer is zero, not one, nada. You simply can't pretend that your uninformed view of CO2 is supported by a scientific concensus.
@SammyHales So you are quite convinced of what? What is your opinion of what we need to do about this imminent threat that will destroy the world? Dying to hear....
@TheKickerboy99 Your question is fallacious in at least two ways: First, I must accept a premise I haven't agreed to in order to answer it. Second, you have offered a strawman position of climate science that doesn't actually exist in the mainstream of scientific literature.
Be that as it may, I believe in answering challenges, sometimes even when they are offered in profoundly dishonest ways, as is the case here. (continued in next post)
@TheKickerboy99 I believe the best course of action is for us to start with the rational position that the scientific method works, and that it is not helpful to demonize scientists for merely publishing the results of climate change research. Economics has proven itself to be an essential component of any plan to protect the environment, so remedial action cannot place an excessive burden upon the economy of those nations that are able to respond to climate change pressures.
@TheKickerboy99 Finally, further research should be done to find the best answer for the best way to alleviate the possible negative effects of Co2 emissions and other human activity, and to more precisely assess the threat that these activities present to us. In short, a very careful, sober, and responsible approach is needed here, and making unwarranted attacks on science is definitely not the way to go about that.
@SammyHales Well I'm glad you got that off your chest. In short you don't know, thats fine. I agree with most of what you have said. I find its not the science that has been demonized, but the political movement exaggerating the problem to force a global CO2 tax. The science is what it is, it does not support taxing CO2, yet it continues to be pushed by politicians as the only solution. I bring up Henrik Svensmark as his view of our climate system is the most complete and honest.
@TheKickerboy99 You speak as an uninformed layman. If you had read a single scholarly article on the subject of climate change, which I hightly doubt, it is obvious you gleaned no insight from it. But in another discussion, I did some research on the subject, so allow me to quote from an ACTUAL article from a peer-reviewed journal. (continued)
What you don't seem to realize there's a big difference between the questions of "Are Human effecting the climate?" and "Should we implement a carbon tax". I don't care about what the government decides to do about it, I care about the facts and the science.
You would would rather tell comfortable lies rather then accept where the evidence leads. It wouldn't matter to you if i could hand you a letter from god himself you will never change your mind because you don't want to.
@Kingucktoad You miss the point again, it is ALL about taxing carbon, Maurice Strong told the world that 30 yrs ago. There is a long history behind this agenda, it started with him. The propaganda machine, directed funding, intimidation, coercion, manipulation, all of the wonderful things exposed by climategate, and many other IPCC blunders in press releases, show the corruption of the scientific process.
The evidence speaks for itself, I know you want to make this about taxes because taxes you understand but
the scientific method prevents corruption. I would tell you to read the scientific articles on the "climategate" farce in the peer reviewed articles i linked but I know your not going to so watch potholder54's video. "6. Climate Change -- Those hacked e-mails" and if you really are open to the truth then you'll have no problem watching his series on the SCIENCE behind it
What I love about this is the more I disprove your positions the harder and more desperately you seem to assert they are true. This is a classic dogmatic world view when you cannot handle the possibility that you may be wrong so you choose to place absolute faith in the evidence which supports your position while providing almost no weight in the evidence which refute it. This is not the proper way to evaluate evidence and that's why you keep tripping over you're own sources
@Kingucktoad So the IPCC says a doubling of CO2 will maybe raise temps 3-4* THATS A DOUBLING, (we have raised it less than 4% in 150 yrs) How long do you think a doubling will take? LOL you guys crack me up, simple math discounts CO2 as a threat, but far beyond your thought process apparently.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong? Antarctic cores and indicate that atmospheric CO2 levels were about 260–280 ppmv immediately before industrial emissions began as of 2010 they were recorded at 390 ppm. That's a little more then 4 percent assuming my math is correct.
The numbers your referring to don't take natural re-absorptions process like the ocean and photosynthesis stop getting your information from these think tanks they know nothing!
"The global atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has increased from a pre-industrial value of about 280 ppm to 379 ppm in 2005. The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide in 2005 exceeds by far the natural range over the last 650,000 years (180 to 300 ppm) as determined from ice cores."
This is a quote from an official IPCC report.
w w w ipcc(dot)ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm(dot)pdf
The atmosphere doesn't care how much taxes you pay!
I am absolutely astonished you think the two are connected. The fact that Co2 is a greenhouse and it and others like it are responsible for maintaining a balanced global temperature they are not affected by your tax return.
The science says humans are effecting the climate in a statistically significant way, the fact that you don't like paying taxes does not change the way Co2 molecules trap solar radiation. That's absurd.
@Kingucktoad CO2's effect is not a threat, in fact it is barely measurable, you SHOULD know that. Taxing it will change that how? Oh right it won't it will just make a chosen few richer, halt development of the third world killing millions, and break economies globally already on the brink of collapse. So what's your hope here?
Co2 is barley measurable? Huh that odd considering NASA seems to think humans are dumping 7 billion tons of Co2 into the atmosphere every year a number backed up at least by NAS and AAAS. In fact, those silly scientists seem to think the number are so good you can even calculate your own personal Co2 contribution using them. But I guess that all part of the great conspiracy of UNPAID IPCC scientists to instill some sort of Illuminati NWO world government right? RIGHT?!
@Pill88Dickle you also must not have read all my comments yet. I cite that as my reason for not believing that my government spends money doing things that are beneficial to the majority.
@verd12w But my comments vary greatly. If you read through the comments (you will notice that I have made quite a few on this video, only because it looked to be a battlefield of conflicting views) You will notice that I have only made 2 references to the MPAA
@Pill88Dickle and the MPAA owns both parties, the parties just take turns saying the other is violating everyone's rights, and the middle does what it does best. Watches and says that it would never do that. They are right, they will never get a chance, but if they were given a chance, I'm sure that they would just do the same as the major parties.
Hey to the YT koolaid drinking Fucks you fucking radical Liberal piece of shit! Bachmann is smarter than your anus and your whore sidekick shit for brains put together
He said "These people rational thought is not there forte" if you have watched the young turks you know it is true of tyt also. As well as a high percent of the politicians in washington and the national media. We need real CHANGE in the country but we always get the same old nonsense.
@loyalpatriot100 CHANGE = Liberalism, it is all about direction. If you want change, but you don't like the type of change that Obama is going for, then you need to call for a different direction, not denouncing liberalism completely.(Which you didn't actually do) Also, don't go to opinionated media outlets, including this one, until you have your own opinion, and can share it with the masses. Otherwise you are just a vestigial structure on an endlessly complex, constantly changing organism
@verd12w that is in an equally complex population of its own species, in an ecosystem with vastly different populations of different species, in a biome filled with complex ecosystems, on a planet that sustains complex life, that is alone in its solar system(as far as life goes), that is in a galaxy that most likely has at least one other planet with life( how arrogant we must be to call ourselves unique), that is in a universe that contains many galaxies (increasing the chances of more life)
@verd12w and for all we know, what we think of as a universe, might not be universe at all, but one of many, or it could be endless. And on what we call Earth, here we are, smaller than atomic particles when compared to everything (or if endless, we are infinitely small), and yet we are here, and we all play a role in our governments, and therefore, our societies, and the global society of humanity, and we must all do our part to ensure that our planet can sustain, not just our population, but
@verd12w all of the populations of the world, and someday, maybe even the universe. Mass extinction has taken place before from temperature change, and until science shows that we are not affecting anything, we should do what we can to ensure that our planet can be a good environment for every organism's descendants. Just don't take it too seriously, more greenhouse gases are released naturally than from us. Just do your part. Everything counts. Every organism has a role to play, including us.
nancy pelosi is so worried about global warming she flys a private size jet home every week end or so. or she use to.. burning tons and tons of extra fuel. And lets not forget obama. burning 8000 gallons of fuel on earth day to fly to iowa to give a speech. if g bush did that it would b hell to pay. but of course obama is worried about AGW. such a joke
@PInk77W1 You really want to use something like that as argument? Republicans and some democrats have been pushing back clean energy , which means even if someone want to use greener ways to travel, they can't if the oil companies are dictating the policies.
Let me ask you how are you suppose to travel green if green technology doesn't exist yet due to blockade from corporate interests? So far, I can only think of the hybrid, which doesn't fly.
@Neosaigo i like how u didnt disagree with my FACTS. Here are some more facts. I am 50yrs old. I dont own a car. i own three bicycles. Today i rode my bicycle 120miles. Keep on playing the victim, u r playing right into obamas hands... ps there are buses and u can car pool. Not to mention move closer to work.
@PInk77W1 Nice points, I will never drive. You can get anywhere you would need to go punctually, you just need to start at the appropriate time. Bikes and feet ftw!!!
@Neosaigo They have been developing solar powered planes. If they can increase their size to about passenger plane size, and work out some kinks, it may even be viable. Pink is right about the buses, car pooling, and bike riding, there is more than one way to travel green. See my replies to loyalpatriot, do what you can when you are able, but don't go out of your way, you will just make things harder on yourself, something that someone who does their part, doesn't deserve.
@verd12w Al Gores house uses 20x the energy as the ave. american house.!!! Gov. Arnold buys the first private HUM V and he wants to be the GREEN Gov.... these people are CRAZY
Those who would compare LaToya, and the other Jacksons, to a pen of mangy, lice-plagued gibbons could never be acceptable guests at festivals that honor monkeys.
@1991BRabbit2010 Fags? In what context are you calling them this? Would that be a derogatory term referring to a homosexual, a cigarette, a bundle of wood, or an annoying, inconsiderate Harley rider. They don't look like cigarettes, bundles of wood, or Harley riders so I can only assume that you are using the first one. What makes you think that they are homosexuals, and what gives you the right to use derogatory terminology in reference to people you disagree with.
@1991BRabbit2010 and why do you think fags do not provide viable information or credibility? Are you confused? Homosexuality has nothing to do with incredibility. If it did, I think I would have to call you one, for you did not bring any viable information either.
Well Jururselum and on the people there by saying "forgive them for they don't know what they do"
Of course not to many people would think anything of the "Sky Darkening" after Jesus Screamed for the Elohim(mistranslated as "Father") but "10,000 angels" were about to Charge and slaughter everybody to rescue him
In some versions of the Story the Solders and people are asking "Eloihim?Why is he calling for Elohim?" with them gasping as Elohim ship came
My alltime favorite AGW quote follows, by laurelbush of YT;
'The Baltic Sea is freezing up much earlier than normal. We are told that the record cold in the Baltic is due to a lack of sea ice, so it follows that the excess sea ice is due to a lack of sea ice.'
That pretty well sums up the absolute nuttiness of the AGW argument. In other words, they haven't a clue and like a child caught in a lie, they whip out everything from the end of the world to the return of Adolf Hitler.
'The Baltic Sea is freezing up much earlier than normal. We are told that the record cold in the Baltic is due to a lack of sea ice, so it follows that the excess sea ice is due to a lack of sea ice.'
....My alltime favorite AGW quote, above, is credited to laurelbush on YT
Countries in talks at Mexico's Cancun beach resort are split over how to toughen existing pledges to cut carbon emissions, made at last year's Copenhagen summit which ended in a brief, non-binding agreement.
Yeah, yeah... just carbon tax us already. Europe is steeped in it already, we're next. Just like cigarette taxes keep people from smoking... LOL. Money... plain and simple! Unless you're going to trade your car and house for a bicycle and hut don't bother replying. No matter how efficient energy can be made there is still a carbon footprint. Now you can continue to blah, blah.
@UnitedCorpOfAmerica bullshit, hydrogen fuel releases no carbon emissions, and nuclear power also releases no carbon emissions. The term carbon footprint only refers to what we contribute, not what comes out from the ground naturally
@UnitedCorpOfAmerica Oh and btw, you don't have to capitalize lol, it has become like scuba. It stands for something, but needs no translation because it has received the collective definition of its parts. Who actually thinks laugh out loud when they see lol. I just assume they are fake laughing.
HHMMM... HOW WOULD I USE "TOYOTA TECHNOLOGY"... ??!!!! ...
I WOULD PROB@BLY USE IT TO ANNIHILATE [MORTAL-KOMBAT-STYLE]... ALL O' YOU OMNIPRESENT, OVER-ZEALOUS, TIME-WASTING, "YOU-TUBE ADVERTISING MADDA-SACKKAZZ" !!!
[ AND, TO DA SPAMMERZ ... UNTIL I COME 4 Y'ALL ... DONT CHU'ALL GO NOWHERE !!! ]
@eklctc1Kng1arrw Caps Lock? Seriously? When I just see caps, I assume that the person's opinion is not worth reviewing. You're lucky I am in a good mood today, or I might have just passed on this comment, and you wouldn't have learned a valuable internet lesson.
A aaa aaaa a aaaa, I bbbbb bbb bbbb. = Formal, probably worth reading
a aaa aaaa a aaaa, I bbbbb bbb bbbb = Informal (people often capitalize I even when not capitalizing anything else they should have) Probably still worth ready
If i were you, i'd rather worry more about "coherence."
Because--> Even though you make a strong case with your argument (& i perfectly understand you).. I can't help but politely ask that you re-read your paragraphs (especially the last one) & ask yourself if it is "coherent."
For instance, your last word ("ready").. really should be "reading."
Anyway, i'm glad that you're having a great day.. & may you continue to be blessed !
Actually the lunatics are those who just take this GW BS at face value. CHeck the science and you will find co2 is caused by oceans which are heated by solar activity and it happened long before humans were on the planert and it will happen many times after we like the dinosaurs are gone, caused by "natural" forces, not by human created global warming. BTW global warming is happening on all the other planets in the solar system where there are no humans. DUHHHH
Also, all we need to do is get 50% of Minnesota's 6th district plus 1 human being and its over. 50% plus 1 human being and bat shit insane lady is out of there.
We should focus a lot of effort to change minds there.
@2edsajdmsa I agree, her mindset is similar to a fusion of any one person in a mental institution and a McCarthyism style mindset. Dangerous combination if you ask me
Cmon man! Its like a fucking sitcom. Only its not a sitcom, these are your politicians. I'm so embarrassed for America bro, and in a good way. Lets turn this train wreck around and put the USA back to the top.
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
Here is a note to all of you naysayers about global warming.. I dont know whether it is happening or not due to humans.. but #1) wouldn't you rather be safe than sorry? and #2) Oil and natural resources are running out and we will reach peak oil in the next 15 years and we had better start transitioning towards a green economy or else we will be fucked!
@jamspooge86 i don't have a problem with global warming as a theory. but the U.S. administration has lost all credibility to be trusted in setting up any programs or policies surrounding anything. the very reason they're pushing it so desperately is the very reason we shouldn't go along with it.
Climate Change happens, there is no evident that directly links humans to it. There is more evidence that temperature affects CO2, not the other way around. Also, we produce less than 5% of world CO2 levels, and then there's the fact that CO2 is less than 1% of the atmosphere and about the same amount of greenhouse gases. Most of it is water vapor. So agreed, its a just another attempt to gain power.
Argue with what - your numbers? A better question to ask would be, wheres your proof of causation? You have none. There is no real science, there is no consensus. At best, all you have is bastardized data. You bought in to the biggest hoax in the history of the modern world. A hoax that unravels more and more every day. Youre a gullible fool. If you cant understand real science or scientific method, then just "follow the money" or look at the rest of the kooks who promote this nonsense.
Anyone who thinks that "Jesus saved the planet 2000 years ago" is someone who might close all the hospitals because Jesus healed the sick 2000 years ago! What a loon!
@roverguy715 No, "this dude" is right on! michele bachmann is a right wing irrational nut job, or maybe she just lies for here sponsors. If you didn't know this or understand it you must not be paying attention. Maybe michele and palin need to get a room and share their idiocy.
The biodiversity of small mammals in North America may already be close to a "tipping point" causing impacts "up and down the food chain" according to a new study by U.S. scientists. CNN
CLIMATE CHANGE BLAMED AS COASTAL WHALE MIGRATION DWINDLES
Fluctuations in the gray whale population are to be expected. But a three-year trend of fewer calves being born could be attributed to climate change and hints at the challenges that may lie ahead.
everyone knows global warming is a scam,dreamt up by the rothschilds twenty or so years ago. the ice caps have now more ice on them than past years. it hasn't warmed warmed for the past 10 years. fact! So the con ends ! wake up people do your own research the science is there.
Man-made climate change blamed for 'significant' rise in ocean temperature
The world's oceans are warming up and the rise is both significant and real, according to one of the most comprehensive studies into marine temperature data gathered over the past two decades.
"The Carboniferous had up to 20 times the CO2 as today, and the Jurassic had up to 15 times today's levels, where delicate aragonite corals first evolved.
The oceans weren't acidic as we have fossils of shellfish and corals from this time that haven't been dissolved. The oceans are PH 7.9-8.3 which is alkaline.
All that CO2 and never a tipping point or runaway greenhouse, ever."
Which is why there is no concern about climate change.
Fight over beetle-kill burns as bugs move to Front Range
Debate about what to do with the millions of acres of pine trees in the West that have been destroyed by the mountain pine beetle is bleeding over into a battle about how to best protect Colorados roadless areas.
Carbon in warming soil could accelerate climate change.
Warming soils in Canada's north are releasing a vast store of carbon that has been inert for millennia, which could further accelerate the rate of climate change, according to the author of a new study published in the journal Nature
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sorry deniers...
Breaking climate news
GLOBAL WARMING reduces grain output.
Rising temperatures and inadequate rainfall are causing grain output to stagnate in India, threatening food security in the worlds second-most populous nation, according to a weather scientist.
Actually, the grain output problem in india is far more systemic than that. In the 50's, when US & UK Ag folks convinced many parts of India to convert from dry farming to water farming. The problem in that region, is that their farms not only have dependence on water in normally dryer regions, but their farmlands have been steadily sinking & eroding away since the 1960's.
Thanks, sorry for the late reply. That's really interesting. It's not hard to believe that practices were introduced that didn't take into account the best ways to do things for those particular regions. It's too bad.
@Niightversionn Quit impersonating me all over youtube, Spitfiremacx AKA N ii ghtversionn Nigh tt versionn Knigh tt vision Nigtversionn Nightver ss ion, Nigh ttt versionn Nightversio m Nightverslon, Nightversio nnn, qooq2k etc.. Stalker, impersonator, global warming denier. What an imbecile
Hi, yeah for real. The global warming deniers like to impersonate people. They like my name I guess, and I don't care, it's just a name, so I'm going to make some more channels and just continue posting my commentary/articles on yotube for a while.
There is no end to their lying and fraudulent behavior.
I mean, yeah, they clone everyone, but they made a lot of my name.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
More climate news...
Scientists project intensifying impacts from future climate change
Published: November 16th, 2009
Climate change has already been observed in many Earth systems; these changes are documented in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, published in 2007.1. Like earlier versions, this report is a synthesis of hundreds of individual peer-reviewed scientific papers on the causes and effects of climate change
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
More climate in the news
BIODIVERSITY NEARS POINT OF NO RETURN
BBC NEWS
Sunday, 17 January 2010
The decline in the world's biodiversity is approaching a point of no return, warns Hilary Benn. In this week's Green Room, the UK's environment secretary urges the international community to seize the chance to act before it is too late.
This host is the lamest person ever...blinded by Liberal lies, hate, and emotion. "Force a Liberal to debate the facts, not emotion and it leaves any Liberal with the loudest microphone in the loneliest port-a-potty."
Conservatives = FAIL = universe's biggest hypocrites. They actively DEFEND unlimited CEO salaries and corporate welfare for oil, gas, nuclear, meat and many other destructive industries.
But, when taxes might need to be raised an insignificant fraction in order to force these conservatives to clean up their messes and to be held responsible for their actions - to actually do the TINIEST good - they whine and bitch and complain.
Global Warming is real, there is a University degree on Climate Change, and my brother's friend studies it. The world has increased by 1.6 degrees and the point of no return is at 2 degrees. CO2 increases the temperature, and there is 390 PPM (increasing 3-4 each year) of CO2 right now (More then the 200 ppm it should be at), the red zone is at 450 ppm and unfortunately that's coming soon. How can u argue with that.
No, the Northern Hemisphere average of 40 weather stations in the IPCC report is +1.6
If you take the total amount of Northern hemisphere stations you get +7 at the Poles,which means little considering you are still freezing your ass off at 45f instead of 38f in the Summer,the Sub Polar is +5 on Average and the Upper temperate is +4
Actually look at mid temperate and it is -4, Lower Temperate and Subtropics is -5 and Tropics is -7 (oops)
p.s. True AGT is 15c and has been that way for 10,000 years with the AGT switching from 13c to 14c 50,000 years ago and the word switching from 12c(Ice Age) to 13c 100,000 years ago
The Average Interglacial Peak is 18c which is long overdue(the 15c for 10,000 is the fluke in a otherwise unstable world/environment,not the norm) with the Highest peak ever being 22c(guess when)
For all their jargon and cherry picking the Earth is still 15c, they are hyping Climate zone temperature variability
@TheLeporad Old but dude, you made the worst argument for global warming. There is a college degree on it. Here you assume the most asinine thing you could: That people in college are smart or know what they are talking about. But again, warming doesn't mean we caused it, changing happens.
@TheLeporad Umm well. CO2 doesn't increase the temperature, and climate change is that natural order of things. It happens. It's not reversible and is not man made. Now I believe In renewable energy because Fossil fuels won't last forever. Climate fluctuates an Ice Age here a drought there yada yada yada.
@TheLeporad yeah, thats why we are having record cold temps. oh yeah, global warming is on hold for ten years, then its coming back. Thats what the people that gave you your info, stated as fact, on hold for ten years....FAIL. The figures you are talking about are wrong, the "scientists" that were gathering that info were caught red handed keepings inaccurate records and "hiding the decline" where have you been? so how can YOU argue with THAT? LALALALALA cant hear you, just kidding, go ahead...
@TheLeporad while i belive global warming exsist i dont belive MAN made global warming does! FUCKING volcanoes make more CO2 then all our factories cars and factories and cars and cars put together!! FuCKING! ROTTING PLANTS! makes more then our cars and our childrens cars !! INFACT!!! MAN MADEEE CO2 contributes to less then a percent DUMB FUCKKKKKKKK>>>ITS THE SUN
@mesa134 have to agree with you on the points that more CO2 is naturally emitted than could possibly come from humans. Other than that, the extra caps and misspelled words show that you fail at thinking.
Man made Global warming is a hoax, unless you take money from liberals to study it then its real.
TheNinjaPicker 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
More evidence/impacts of climate change series...(please read my article before the denier with all the sock puppet accounts censors it)..
.
Wind farm opponents 'aided and abetted' by climate sceptic groups
.
The anti-wind farm movement that is gaining influence in the NSW Parliament is being ''aided and abetted'' by climate sceptic groups and some mining figures.
.
Sydney Morning Herald, Australia
20 December 2011
Nightversionn 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evidence / impacts of climate change series...(read it before the denier with all the sock puppet channels censors it)...
.
Governor vows to prepare California for climate change
.
The United Nations' top climate official joined California Governor Jerry Brown on Thursday to call for renewed efforts in the state to more quickly adapt to the risks that extreme weather and a rising sea pose to agriculture and the coastline.
.
Associated Press
16 December 2011
Nightversionn 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just one question - did humans cause previous ice ages and tropical epochs?
AcePilot101 1 month ago
"Overwhelming consensus" what a joke. This just goes to show that you only listen to the global warming apologists, there is NO consensus.
Consensus is not something arrived at in a few years in science even though a lot of people would prefer it to be.
The simple fact you talk of consensus shows you don't even know the amount of scientists who disagree.
Anyone who thinks the sun is not the main cause of the earth's temperature is just to stupid to communicate with anyway... have fun
1famekouby 4 months ago
Rationale thought is not their forte!
Awesome!!!!!!!
757WN 5 months ago
Oh god, not only will she ruin the economy but also the environment..!
laurayu70 5 months ago
Man-made global warming is a joke. Those who promote it are wilful idiots or con artists.
CO2 emission is a consequence of heat rise, not the other way round. The main effector of heat change on earth is the SUN (duuuu!).
People who buy this crap seem to be rather ignorant of history. Read up on the medieval warm period, heat rise in no way means an end of the world as Al Gore would like you to think. Plants and wildlife love it.
Get used to it and fuck the global carbon tax.
1famekouby 5 months ago
@1famekouby
CO2 emissions and heat rise positively reinforce one another. Rising temperatures cause the oceans to release sequestered CO2, which increases temperatures.
In the past, the sun has been responsible for the initial warming, but we know that CO2 can be just as effective an initial cause as the sun. It's the same process we've seen in the past, except that we've added another massive source of CO2 emissions.
doloafing 5 months ago
@1famekouby That sure sounds good on paper. Now let's see it in SCIENCE. History is not the issue. Wrong subject.
baigandine 4 months ago
@baigandine Oh yeah, historical precedent has no meaning to science... Pull the other one mate. Go read up on the scientific method and the importance of precedent and DATA. When you have a governing body who is capable of "forgetting" the medieval warm period just to further an agenda, you don't only have a big political problem, you have what is called a mindless mass of following zombies.
In what way would exporting your industry to China save the planet, pray? Please enlighten me here.
1famekouby 4 months ago
@1famekouby Historical evidence has relevance, but too often it's all people on your side bring. No. It usually comes with insane conspiracy theories. I'd like to see scientific data refuted with science. That's all. What you take this medieval warming period as proof as? That something else could cause global warming besides man? That doesn't really speak to the validity of manmade global warming. Obviously an effect can have more than one cause.
baigandine 4 months ago
@baigandine "insane conspiracy theories", you mean along the lines of "the sun has little influence on climate change, the main responsible agent is a gas which composes 0,04% of the atmosphere and is one of the 4 building blocks of the life form known as humans"? Or other "insane conspiracy theories" like "exporting industry to the third world and taxing the first world will help against global warming".
Because when you strip down the arguments to the core principals, that is what they say.
1famekouby 4 months ago
@1famekouby Overwhelming consensus of scientists outweighs the fact that something may seem intuitively inaccurate. Many things which seem absurd are nevertheless scientifically true. "Truth is stranger than fiction" as they say. As for your policy argument, that's a whole other issue, and I can't say I necessarily disagree with you there. But that's no reason to doubt the science.
baigandine 4 months ago
@baigandine Science? Riddle me this, how did my SUV cause the planet to warm after the ice age and little ice age? Thought so
TheNinjaPicker 3 weeks ago
The glaciers on mars are melting because of our SUVs here! We've got to tax the world quickly otherwise we won't be able to save mother earth and mister gore won't be able to work his pyramid scheme! Quick quick tax us more please!
1famekouby 4 months ago
@1famekouby Actually the liberals want to tax YOU less, go cry to the party that IS taking all your money. The republicans and libertarians. How you guys can't see trough their bullshit is amazing. Bush cries terrorist and every republican voter are happily reaching for their wallet. Bush cried poor wall street is in trouble and what did you guys do, again happily gave him 700 billion$ so that he could give the money to his buddies.
You're getting screwed in the ass and you're begging for more.
baldurus1 4 months ago
@baldurus1 Nah.
Khyrid 4 months ago
@baldurus1 True. Bush was the first GOP president to wage war and not raise taxes to pay for military actions. He increased the size of the government more than any other Republican president prior.
ShawnsterVideos 3 months ago
Michele Bachmann was RIGHT and YOU were WRONG you ignoramus!!
MissionaryJames 5 months ago
You made this Video in 2008, but in 2010 You and many other Global Warming Alarmists were proven wrong and caught with your pants down ALTERING the DATA in YOUR FAVOR......Whattya got to say now you Bozo?
MissionaryJames 5 months ago
This guy is a moron.
Global warming? Bla hahahahahahahahahaha!
What a douche.
theframerswereright 6 months ago
No one supports polluting, and we should try to reduce waste. But carbon tax is not the answer and won't help reduce CO2 one bit. Do your research folks and don't listen to these smug tv brats. Peace.
anthroparion 6 months ago 2
All I know is that CO2 tax is a scam and not one single document you can produce says CO2 is an imminent threat, because its not. Plastic in the ocean, sure, nuclear waste in the ocean, but not CO2. They have been trying to brainwash people into it to accept the proposed tax. I ask again how will cap and trade help the world as it seems that is what you support. Just answer the question.
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 Really? Alright I will produce several, if you want more I can give you more.
I will state upfront I obviously haven't had time to real all these but I have skimmed a few. Unlike your source these are both articles that support AGW and "skeptical" as well for ballence sake which you don't seem to think matter. Though it appears they had just as much trouble find decent sources as you did.
I would suggest you start with "CO2 effect is weak" 35 support AGW 3 against.
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
@Kingucktoad It is obvious you don't read them either, but I think anyone could tell the premise each is based on. It is not CO2, but the actual drivers of climate. Of course the climate changes, and of course the Earth is nearing the end of a long warming trend. No one has proven it is any different than any in the past, in fact the IPCC's own data shows it is at the same rate as past warming trends. If it can be shown that human produced CO2 is causing dangerous warming then I'm with you.
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
As a matter of fact I've read the first three. I even went as far as searching for scientific responses to the first one. But I stopped once I realized where you actually got them and that they didn't say what you thought they did so it was a waste of my time.
The reality is no scientist ANYWHERE from ANY discipline (and you can check this if you want) can account for the resent rise in temperatures without taking co2 into account they have just been too sharp too fast.
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kingucktoad "We can't account for the lack of warming, and its a travesty that we can't" I say again, there has been no warming at all out of normal rises, further the last ten years warming has slowed greatly while CO2 rises at a steady rate. CO2 has never lead temps and never will.....ITS A SCAM YOU DOLT!
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@Kingucktoad As I have tried to point out to you, but you seem oblivious to it, there has been no abnormal warming. In the last ten years warming has slowed, these cycles happen because of our travel through space, and cosmic rays vary our cloud cover. To say that raising a trace gas like CO2 from 365 ppm to 380ppm in 150 yrs has had any measurable change from normal is just not true.(measured data contradicts it) As I also said before, 10k years ago there was a mile of ice where I am now.
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 I love how science deniers like you love to create bizarro versions of scientific theories, and then vigorously attack these strawman positions that only exist in your own minds. If global warming speeds or slows...then science is wrong! If there was an ice age in the past...then science is wrong! WTF?!
I have never heard of any scientific theory on global warming that would be falsified by ice ages or fluctuations in warming. Maybe youre a renaissance man? Submit your paper!
SammyHales 6 months ago
@SammyHales Ok CO2 should and does cause some warming....you happy now? LOL I guess you guys keep missing my main point which is this. Taxing CO2 is a scam, it will not decrease its output, and will make zero difference in the world at all. Unless of course you support killing off most of the Earths population, CO2 will be produced in ever larger quantities. Changing to different energy sources will help lessen the production of CO2, but thats it, taxing it just makes AL Gore money.
TheKickerboy99 6 months ago
@SammyHales Further, I guess the part that pisses me off about the whole AGW movement is the lies and deceit employed to gain this world wide tax. The whole idea was invented by Maurice Strong, hes a scam artist the likes of which the world has never seen. CO2 is not an imminent threat, it is a life gas on this planet. All of the information I have seen says that our global temps are more so controlled by the sun and cosmic rays forming clouds, sorry if that offends you.
TheKickerboy99 6 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, a paper reached the following conclusions: 97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC (Anthropogenic Climate Change) outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
SammyHales 6 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 The number of nationally and internationally recognized scientific organizations that support the IPCC view on global warming is too long to list here. It would take pages to do that. Conversely, do you want to take a guess at how many of them dissent from that view? Come close so I can whisper in your ear...the answer is zero, not one, nada. You simply can't pretend that your uninformed view of CO2 is supported by a scientific concensus.
SammyHales 6 months ago
@SammyHales So you are quite convinced of what? What is your opinion of what we need to do about this imminent threat that will destroy the world? Dying to hear....
TheKickerboy99 6 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 Your question is fallacious in at least two ways: First, I must accept a premise I haven't agreed to in order to answer it. Second, you have offered a strawman position of climate science that doesn't actually exist in the mainstream of scientific literature.
Be that as it may, I believe in answering challenges, sometimes even when they are offered in profoundly dishonest ways, as is the case here. (continued in next post)
SammyHales 6 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 I believe the best course of action is for us to start with the rational position that the scientific method works, and that it is not helpful to demonize scientists for merely publishing the results of climate change research. Economics has proven itself to be an essential component of any plan to protect the environment, so remedial action cannot place an excessive burden upon the economy of those nations that are able to respond to climate change pressures.
SammyHales 6 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 Finally, further research should be done to find the best answer for the best way to alleviate the possible negative effects of Co2 emissions and other human activity, and to more precisely assess the threat that these activities present to us. In short, a very careful, sober, and responsible approach is needed here, and making unwarranted attacks on science is definitely not the way to go about that.
SammyHales 6 months ago
@SammyHales Well I'm glad you got that off your chest. In short you don't know, thats fine. I agree with most of what you have said. I find its not the science that has been demonized, but the political movement exaggerating the problem to force a global CO2 tax. The science is what it is, it does not support taxing CO2, yet it continues to be pushed by politicians as the only solution. I bring up Henrik Svensmark as his view of our climate system is the most complete and honest.
TheKickerboy99 6 months ago
@SammyHales One last thing, the position I have comes from scientific papers, not a political movement.
TheKickerboy99 6 months ago
@TheKickerboy99 You speak as an uninformed layman. If you had read a single scholarly article on the subject of climate change, which I hightly doubt, it is obvious you gleaned no insight from it. But in another discussion, I did some research on the subject, so allow me to quote from an ACTUAL article from a peer-reviewed journal. (continued)
SammyHales 6 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
What you don't seem to realize there's a big difference between the questions of "Are Human effecting the climate?" and "Should we implement a carbon tax". I don't care about what the government decides to do about it, I care about the facts and the science.
You would would rather tell comfortable lies rather then accept where the evidence leads. It wouldn't matter to you if i could hand you a letter from god himself you will never change your mind because you don't want to.
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
@Kingucktoad You miss the point again, it is ALL about taxing carbon, Maurice Strong told the world that 30 yrs ago. There is a long history behind this agenda, it started with him. The propaganda machine, directed funding, intimidation, coercion, manipulation, all of the wonderful things exposed by climategate, and many other IPCC blunders in press releases, show the corruption of the scientific process.
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
The evidence speaks for itself, I know you want to make this about taxes because taxes you understand but
the scientific method prevents corruption. I would tell you to read the scientific articles on the "climategate" farce in the peer reviewed articles i linked but I know your not going to so watch potholder54's video. "6. Climate Change -- Those hacked e-mails" and if you really are open to the truth then you'll have no problem watching his series on the SCIENCE behind it
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
What I love about this is the more I disprove your positions the harder and more desperately you seem to assert they are true. This is a classic dogmatic world view when you cannot handle the possibility that you may be wrong so you choose to place absolute faith in the evidence which supports your position while providing almost no weight in the evidence which refute it. This is not the proper way to evaluate evidence and that's why you keep tripping over you're own sources
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
@Kingucktoad So the IPCC says a doubling of CO2 will maybe raise temps 3-4* THATS A DOUBLING, (we have raised it less than 4% in 150 yrs) How long do you think a doubling will take? LOL you guys crack me up, simple math discounts CO2 as a threat, but far beyond your thought process apparently.
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
Do you ever get tired of being wrong? Antarctic cores and indicate that atmospheric CO2 levels were about 260–280 ppmv immediately before industrial emissions began as of 2010 they were recorded at 390 ppm. That's a little more then 4 percent assuming my math is correct.
The numbers your referring to don't take natural re-absorptions process like the ocean and photosynthesis stop getting your information from these think tanks they know nothing!
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
Comment removed
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
The IPCC says no such thing check your sources.
"The global atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide has increased from a pre-industrial value of about 280 ppm to 379 ppm in 2005. The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide in 2005 exceeds by far the natural range over the last 650,000 years (180 to 300 ppm) as determined from ice cores."
This is a quote from an official IPCC report.
w w w ipcc(dot)ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-spm(dot)pdf
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
The atmosphere doesn't care how much taxes you pay!
I am absolutely astonished you think the two are connected. The fact that Co2 is a greenhouse and it and others like it are responsible for maintaining a balanced global temperature they are not affected by your tax return.
The science says humans are effecting the climate in a statistically significant way, the fact that you don't like paying taxes does not change the way Co2 molecules trap solar radiation. That's absurd.
Kingucktoad 7 months ago
@Kingucktoad CO2's effect is not a threat, in fact it is barely measurable, you SHOULD know that. Taxing it will change that how? Oh right it won't it will just make a chosen few richer, halt development of the third world killing millions, and break economies globally already on the brink of collapse. So what's your hope here?
TheKickerboy99 7 months ago
@TheKickerboy99
Co2 is barley measurable? Huh that odd considering NASA seems to think humans are dumping 7 billion tons of Co2 into the atmosphere every year a number backed up at least by NAS and AAAS. In fact, those silly scientists seem to think the number are so good you can even calculate your own personal Co2 contribution using them. But I guess that all part of the great conspiracy of UNPAID IPCC scientists to instill some sort of Illuminati NWO world government right? RIGHT?!
Kingucktoad 7 months ago 2
Vague uncheckable rumors tells about WMD in an oil rich country - Desition: INVADE!
Hundreds of sientists claim that oil is destroying our climate - Desition: DON'T DO A DAMN THING.
Isn't it obvious who is running America?
AngeCord 7 months ago
@Pill88Dickle you also must not have read all my comments yet. I cite that as my reason for not believing that my government spends money doing things that are beneficial to the majority.
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w But my comments vary greatly. If you read through the comments (you will notice that I have made quite a few on this video, only because it looked to be a battlefield of conflicting views) You will notice that I have only made 2 references to the MPAA
verd12w 7 months ago
@Pill88Dickle Has nothing to do with religion
verd12w 7 months ago
@Pill88Dickle and the MPAA owns both parties, the parties just take turns saying the other is violating everyone's rights, and the middle does what it does best. Watches and says that it would never do that. They are right, they will never get a chance, but if they were given a chance, I'm sure that they would just do the same as the major parties.
verd12w 7 months ago
watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI
CelticKraut 7 months ago
Hey to the YT koolaid drinking Fucks you fucking radical Liberal piece of shit! Bachmann is smarter than your anus and your whore sidekick shit for brains put together
firthoffifthtom 7 months ago
@firthoffifthtom Whore...really? Do you have to resort to that? Radical? Do you know what radical means?
"Bachmann is smarter than you anus..."
A rat is smarter than even the most intelligent human's anus. Sorry, but that does not prove anything.
At least Pink77W1 and Neosaigo don't spout complete nonsense when they argue.
verd12w 7 months ago
He said "These people rational thought is not there forte" if you have watched the young turks you know it is true of tyt also. As well as a high percent of the politicians in washington and the national media. We need real CHANGE in the country but we always get the same old nonsense.
loyalpatriot100 9 months ago
@loyalpatriot100 CHANGE = Liberalism, it is all about direction. If you want change, but you don't like the type of change that Obama is going for, then you need to call for a different direction, not denouncing liberalism completely.(Which you didn't actually do) Also, don't go to opinionated media outlets, including this one, until you have your own opinion, and can share it with the masses. Otherwise you are just a vestigial structure on an endlessly complex, constantly changing organism
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w that is in an equally complex population of its own species, in an ecosystem with vastly different populations of different species, in a biome filled with complex ecosystems, on a planet that sustains complex life, that is alone in its solar system(as far as life goes), that is in a galaxy that most likely has at least one other planet with life( how arrogant we must be to call ourselves unique), that is in a universe that contains many galaxies (increasing the chances of more life)
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w and for all we know, what we think of as a universe, might not be universe at all, but one of many, or it could be endless. And on what we call Earth, here we are, smaller than atomic particles when compared to everything (or if endless, we are infinitely small), and yet we are here, and we all play a role in our governments, and therefore, our societies, and the global society of humanity, and we must all do our part to ensure that our planet can sustain, not just our population, but
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w all of the populations of the world, and someday, maybe even the universe. Mass extinction has taken place before from temperature change, and until science shows that we are not affecting anything, we should do what we can to ensure that our planet can be a good environment for every organism's descendants. Just don't take it too seriously, more greenhouse gases are released naturally than from us. Just do your part. Everything counts. Every organism has a role to play, including us.
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w That is probably the most comments I've ever made at one time. Take your time, and take what you want from it.
the tl;dr version: Everyone has a role to play. Even your opponents.
verd12w 7 months ago
I do have my own opinion didn't you read and comment back.
loyalpatriot100 5 months ago
I am a muslim and I like to blow things up
Whatever Al qada
LerdoBurgerPimp 9 months ago
nancy pelosi is so worried about global warming she flys a private size jet home every week end or so. or she use to.. burning tons and tons of extra fuel. And lets not forget obama. burning 8000 gallons of fuel on earth day to fly to iowa to give a speech. if g bush did that it would b hell to pay. but of course obama is worried about AGW. such a joke
PInk77W1 11 months ago
@PInk77W1 You really want to use something like that as argument? Republicans and some democrats have been pushing back clean energy , which means even if someone want to use greener ways to travel, they can't if the oil companies are dictating the policies.
Let me ask you how are you suppose to travel green if green technology doesn't exist yet due to blockade from corporate interests? So far, I can only think of the hybrid, which doesn't fly.
Neosaigo 8 months ago
@Neosaigo i like how u didnt disagree with my FACTS. Here are some more facts. I am 50yrs old. I dont own a car. i own three bicycles. Today i rode my bicycle 120miles. Keep on playing the victim, u r playing right into obamas hands... ps there are buses and u can car pool. Not to mention move closer to work.
PInk77W1 8 months ago
@PInk77W1 Nice points, I will never drive. You can get anywhere you would need to go punctually, you just need to start at the appropriate time. Bikes and feet ftw!!!
verd12w 7 months ago
@Neosaigo They have been developing solar powered planes. If they can increase their size to about passenger plane size, and work out some kinks, it may even be viable. Pink is right about the buses, car pooling, and bike riding, there is more than one way to travel green. See my replies to loyalpatriot, do what you can when you are able, but don't go out of your way, you will just make things harder on yourself, something that someone who does their part, doesn't deserve.
verd12w 7 months ago
@PInk77W1 I'm not even going to look to see if you're telling the truth, I wouldn't be surprised.
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w Al Gores house uses 20x the energy as the ave. american house.!!! Gov. Arnold buys the first private HUM V and he wants to be the GREEN Gov.... these people are CRAZY
PInk77W1 7 months ago
Those who would compare LaToya, and the other Jacksons, to a pen of mangy, lice-plagued gibbons could never be acceptable guests at festivals that honor monkeys.
LoveTurnshateful 11 months ago
They should be called the young fags. I haven't seen one of these that has any viable information or credibility for that matter.
1991BRabbit2010 11 months ago
@1991BRabbit2010 Fags? In what context are you calling them this? Would that be a derogatory term referring to a homosexual, a cigarette, a bundle of wood, or an annoying, inconsiderate Harley rider. They don't look like cigarettes, bundles of wood, or Harley riders so I can only assume that you are using the first one. What makes you think that they are homosexuals, and what gives you the right to use derogatory terminology in reference to people you disagree with.
verd12w 7 months ago
@1991BRabbit2010 and why do you think fags do not provide viable information or credibility? Are you confused? Homosexuality has nothing to do with incredibility. If it did, I think I would have to call you one, for you did not bring any viable information either.
verd12w 7 months ago
"Jesus Saved the Planet 2000 years ago"
Well Jururselum and on the people there by saying "forgive them for they don't know what they do"
Of course not to many people would think anything of the "Sky Darkening" after Jesus Screamed for the Elohim(mistranslated as "Father") but "10,000 angels" were about to Charge and slaughter everybody to rescue him
In some versions of the Story the Solders and people are asking "Eloihim?Why is he calling for Elohim?" with them gasping as Elohim ship came
TheRealArchAngel 11 months ago
Man made Global Warming is a fraud. Exposed.
matt75hooper 11 months ago
@matt75hooper Proof or gtfo
verd12w 7 months ago
Well I see that he has twenty five thousand views on here. Now that he's moved over to MSNBC, look for his numbers to drop precipitously!
OperaPilot 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
My alltime favorite AGW quote follows, by laurelbush of YT;
'The Baltic Sea is freezing up much earlier than normal. We are told that the record cold in the Baltic is due to a lack of sea ice, so it follows that the excess sea ice is due to a lack of sea ice.'
That pretty well sums up the absolute nuttiness of the AGW argument. In other words, they haven't a clue and like a child caught in a lie, they whip out everything from the end of the world to the return of Adolf Hitler.
Sundogjeep 1 year ago
@Sundogjeep I didn't see any apocalypse or Nazi necromancy in the quote. I think we should refer to Godwin's Law for this. Are you admitting defeat?
verd12w 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'The Baltic Sea is freezing up much earlier than normal. We are told that the record cold in the Baltic is due to a lack of sea ice, so it follows that the excess sea ice is due to a lack of sea ice.'
....My alltime favorite AGW quote, above, is credited to laurelbush on YT
Sundogjeep 1 year ago
Comment removed
666sidewalks 1 year ago
Climate change news..
.
What climate deal may be agreed in Cancun?
.
Countries in talks at Mexico's Cancun beach resort are split over how to toughen existing pledges to cut carbon emissions, made at last year's Copenhagen summit which ended in a brief, non-binding agreement.
.
Reuters
7 December 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Yeah, yeah... just carbon tax us already. Europe is steeped in it already, we're next. Just like cigarette taxes keep people from smoking... LOL. Money... plain and simple! Unless you're going to trade your car and house for a bicycle and hut don't bother replying. No matter how efficient energy can be made there is still a carbon footprint. Now you can continue to blah, blah.
UnitedCorpOfAmerica 1 year ago
@UnitedCorpOfAmerica bullshit, hydrogen fuel releases no carbon emissions, and nuclear power also releases no carbon emissions. The term carbon footprint only refers to what we contribute, not what comes out from the ground naturally
verd12w 7 months ago
@UnitedCorpOfAmerica Oh and btw, you don't have to capitalize lol, it has become like scuba. It stands for something, but needs no translation because it has received the collective definition of its parts. Who actually thinks laugh out loud when they see lol. I just assume they are fake laughing.
verd12w 7 months ago
HHMMM... HOW WOULD I USE "TOYOTA TECHNOLOGY"... ??!!!! ...
I WOULD PROB@BLY USE IT TO ANNIHILATE [MORTAL-KOMBAT-STYLE]... ALL O' YOU OMNIPRESENT, OVER-ZEALOUS, TIME-WASTING, "YOU-TUBE ADVERTISING MADDA-SACKKAZZ" !!!
[ AND, TO DA SPAMMERZ ... UNTIL I COME 4 Y'ALL ... DONT CHU'ALL GO NOWHERE !!! ]
___________________________
eklctc1Kng1arrw 1 year ago
@eklctc1Kng1arrw Caps Lock? Seriously? When I just see caps, I assume that the person's opinion is not worth reviewing. You're lucky I am in a good mood today, or I might have just passed on this comment, and you wouldn't have learned a valuable internet lesson.
A aaa aaaa a aaaa, I bbbbb bbb bbbb. = Formal, probably worth reading
a aaa aaaa a aaaa, I bbbbb bbb bbbb = Informal (people often capitalize I even when not capitalizing anything else they should have) Probably still worth ready
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w A AAA AAAA A AAAA, I BBBBB BBB BBBB = Definitely not worth reading
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w that should be an -ing not a -y
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w
Lol ;--)
If i were you, i'd rather worry more about "coherence."
Because--> Even though you make a strong case with your argument (& i perfectly understand you).. I can't help but politely ask that you re-read your paragraphs (especially the last one) & ask yourself if it is "coherent."
For instance, your last word ("ready").. really should be "reading."
Anyway, i'm glad that you're having a great day.. & may you continue to be blessed !
;---)
eklctc1Kng1arrw 7 months ago
Actually the lunatics are those who just take this GW BS at face value. CHeck the science and you will find co2 is caused by oceans which are heated by solar activity and it happened long before humans were on the planert and it will happen many times after we like the dinosaurs are gone, caused by "natural" forces, not by human created global warming. BTW global warming is happening on all the other planets in the solar system where there are no humans. DUHHHH
jagg1951 1 year ago
@jagg1951 actually, we have no thermometers on the other planets, so they could be getting 300 degrees cooler everyday for all we know.
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w
So we have absolutely no idea what the temperture of Uranus is unless we go there and stick a thermometer in Uranus?
jagg1951 6 months ago
Also, all we need to do is get 50% of Minnesota's 6th district plus 1 human being and its over. 50% plus 1 human being and bat shit insane lady is out of there.
We should focus a lot of effort to change minds there.
2edsajdmsa 1 year ago
@2edsajdmsa I agree, her mindset is similar to a fusion of any one person in a mental institution and a McCarthyism style mindset. Dangerous combination if you ask me
verd12w 7 months ago
Cmon man! Its like a fucking sitcom. Only its not a sitcom, these are your politicians. I'm so embarrassed for America bro, and in a good way. Lets turn this train wreck around and put the USA back to the top.
2edsajdmsa 1 year ago
@2edsajdmsa It is a sitcom in a way.
verd12w 7 months ago
Impacts of climate change in the news...
.
Dust blows in from the ends of the Earth, even beyond
.
Dust. It's not just the bane of anyone trying to keep a tidy home. It can support life, or smother it. It can change continents
.
Washington Post
Opinion
14 September 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Cenk,
Michele Bachman will be voted out of office,
only after Nancy Pelosi stops injecting her fat face with botox.
Until then,
fuck Al Gore and his "global warming" lies, and
address climate change for what it is. Climate change, nothing more, and nothing less.
bobbytiger 1 year ago
@bobbytiger I agree that she probably injects botox every other day. Disagree with using appearance in an argument of this form.
verd12w 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please see the Climate Scientists' Register that the International Climate Science Coalition have created & has been endorsed by 137 climate experts since June 2010:
tinyurl[dot]com/2es3rqx
The Register states:
“We, the undersigned, having assessed the relevant scientific evidence, do not find convincing support for the hypothesis that human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing, or will in the foreseeable future cause, dangerous global warming."
Tom Harris
ICSC
TomHarrisICSC 1 year ago
Here is a note to all of you naysayers about global warming.. I dont know whether it is happening or not due to humans.. but #1) wouldn't you rather be safe than sorry? and #2) Oil and natural resources are running out and we will reach peak oil in the next 15 years and we had better start transitioning towards a green economy or else we will be fucked!
jamspooge86 1 year ago
@jamspooge86 i don't have a problem with global warming as a theory. but the U.S. administration has lost all credibility to be trusted in setting up any programs or policies surrounding anything. the very reason they're pushing it so desperately is the very reason we shouldn't go along with it.
grav04330 1 year ago
@grav04330 Agree that they have no credibility. They are the MPAA's bitches.
verd12w 7 months ago
@jamspooge86 I agree. That is the most compelling reason to switch over to sustainable fuels
verd12w 7 months ago
Climate Change happens, there is no evident that directly links humans to it. There is more evidence that temperature affects CO2, not the other way around. Also, we produce less than 5% of world CO2 levels, and then there's the fact that CO2 is less than 1% of the atmosphere and about the same amount of greenhouse gases. Most of it is water vapor. So agreed, its a just another attempt to gain power.
furlybq 1 year ago
@furlybq that is how our government works. Fuck the issues, we want power.
verd12w 7 months ago
This guy is an f-ing moron.
MinnesotaDave17 1 year ago
AL GORE RAPE SOME AGANE???????????????/
iphoneguy2012 1 year ago
In what danger was the planet 2000 years ago???!!!...
grozde 1 year ago
@grozde Ask someone at a church because I have no idea.
verd12w 7 months ago
Argue with what - your numbers? A better question to ask would be, wheres your proof of causation? You have none. There is no real science, there is no consensus. At best, all you have is bastardized data. You bought in to the biggest hoax in the history of the modern world. A hoax that unravels more and more every day. Youre a gullible fool. If you cant understand real science or scientific method, then just "follow the money" or look at the rest of the kooks who promote this nonsense.
hyedenny 1 year ago
Anyone who thinks that "Jesus saved the planet 2000 years ago" is someone who might close all the hospitals because Jesus healed the sick 2000 years ago! What a loon!
indulis1 1 year ago
This dude is so freaking stupid and has completely embellished and taken the quote out of context...what a moron.
roverguy715 1 year ago
@roverguy715 No, "this dude" is right on! michele bachmann is a right wing irrational nut job, or maybe she just lies for here sponsors. If you didn't know this or understand it you must not be paying attention. Maybe michele and palin need to get a room and share their idiocy.
ReduceGHGs 1 year ago
Impacts of climate change in the news…
Small mammals at risk as world warms
The biodiversity of small mammals in North America may already be close to a "tipping point" causing impacts "up and down the food chain" according to a new study by U.S. scientists. CNN
May 26. 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Roll on the Ice Age and get rid of the parasites in the world....
Clara Massa 1st casualty...Maybe.
Spitfiremacx 1 year ago
@Spitfiremacx
go to bed asshole
Nightversionn 1 year ago
@Nightversionn
Nice Stalk you demented Nutbag...peace be with your tortured being...hope your day goes well and the Dt's do not cause you grief.
Spitfiremacx 1 year ago
@Spitfiremacx
have you gone to bed?
THANK you
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Impacts of climate change in the news
CLIMATE CHANGE BLAMED AS COASTAL WHALE MIGRATION DWINDLES
Fluctuations in the gray whale population are to be expected. But a three-year trend of fewer calves being born could be attributed to climate change and hints at the challenges that may lie ahead.
By Zeke Barlow
VENTURA COUNTY STAR
CALIFORNIA
Posted April 13, 2010 at 8:30 p.m.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
everyone knows global warming is a scam,dreamt up by the rothschilds twenty or so years ago. the ice caps have now more ice on them than past years. it hasn't warmed warmed for the past 10 years. fact! So the con ends ! wake up people do your own research the science is there.
stvb2142 1 year ago
@stvb2142
lol, most of you mindless idiots have random numbers in the nicknames
aerobique 1 year ago
@aerobique And random numbers make up their "facts"...
KungPisstank 1 year ago
Breaking climate news
Man-made climate change blamed for 'significant' rise in ocean temperature
The world's oceans are warming up and the rise is both significant and real, according to one of the most comprehensive studies into marine temperature data gathered over the past two decades.
LONDON INDEPENDENT
UNITED KINGDOM
May 20, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
98% of greenhouse gas effect consist of water. now go figure about the global warming urself
ImmortalHardOn 1 year ago
Climate change in the news..
ALMOST ALL AUSTRIAN GLACIERS SHRANK IN 2009: REPORT
Almost 90 percent of Austrian glaciers shrank in 2009, some by as much as 46 metres (150 feet), the Austrian Alpine Association said Friday.
AGENCE FRANCE-PRESS
April 11, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nightversionn This is a post from MrOllyk.
"The Carboniferous had up to 20 times the CO2 as today, and the Jurassic had up to 15 times today's levels, where delicate aragonite corals first evolved.
The oceans weren't acidic as we have fossils of shellfish and corals from this time that haven't been dissolved. The oceans are PH 7.9-8.3 which is alkaline.
All that CO2 and never a tipping point or runaway greenhouse, ever."
Which is why there is no concern about climate change.
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
Impacts of climate change in the news
Fight over beetle-kill burns as bugs move to Front Range
Debate about what to do with the millions of acres of pine trees in the West that have been destroyed by the mountain pine beetle is bleeding over into a battle about how to best protect Colorados roadless areas.
BOULDER WEEKLY
COLORADO
May 3, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
More impacts of climate change in the news:
Carbon in warming soil could accelerate climate change.
Warming soils in Canada's north are releasing a vast store of carbon that has been inert for millennia, which could further accelerate the rate of climate change, according to the author of a new study published in the journal Nature
VANCOUVER SUN
BRITISH COLUMBIA
April 14, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sorry deniers...
Breaking climate news
GLOBAL WARMING reduces grain output.
Rising temperatures and inadequate rainfall are causing grain output to stagnate in India, threatening food security in the worlds second-most populous nation, according to a weather scientist.
BLOOMBERG NEWS
April 19, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
@Nightversionn
Actually, the grain output problem in india is far more systemic than that. In the 50's, when US & UK Ag folks convinced many parts of India to convert from dry farming to water farming. The problem in that region, is that their farms not only have dependence on water in normally dryer regions, but their farmlands have been steadily sinking & eroding away since the 1960's.
scbluesman13 1 year ago
@scbluesman13
Thanks, sorry for the late reply. That's really interesting. It's not hard to believe that practices were introduced that didn't take into account the best ways to do things for those particular regions. It's too bad.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Nightversionn 1 year ago
@Nightversionn
for real - the guy set up those accounts just to pretend to be you? lmao
cthulhu11111111 1 year ago
@cthulhu11111111
Hi, yeah for real. The global warming deniers like to impersonate people. They like my name I guess, and I don't care, it's just a name, so I'm going to make some more channels and just continue posting my commentary/articles on yotube for a while.
There is no end to their lying and fraudulent behavior.
I mean, yeah, they clone everyone, but they made a lot of my name.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
WHEW! What a relief to know that an invisible cloud wizard is on the Job!
rinka777778 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
More climate news...
Scientists project intensifying impacts from future climate change
Published: November 16th, 2009
Climate change has already been observed in many Earth systems; these changes are documented in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, published in 2007.1. Like earlier versions, this report is a synthesis of hundreds of individual peer-reviewed scientific papers on the causes and effects of climate change
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
More climate in the news
BIODIVERSITY NEARS POINT OF NO RETURN
BBC NEWS
Sunday, 17 January 2010
The decline in the world's biodiversity is approaching a point of no return, warns Hilary Benn. In this week's Green Room, the UK's environment secretary urges the international community to seize the chance to act before it is too late.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT COOLING? LOL!!!
March was the HOTTEST March in the UAH 32 year satellite record.
UAH (Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville) is run by Dr. Christy, the well known AGW denier.
Global temperatures for February = 2nd WARMEST February in 32 years.
Global Temperatures for JANUARY = the HOTTEST January for UAH in 32 years.
HOT OFF THE PRESS - 4/10/10
See the latest delightful YouTube from greenman3610
Debunking LORD MONCKTON Part 1
/watch?v=JfA1LpiYk2o
goog2k 1 year ago
This host is the lamest person ever...blinded by Liberal lies, hate, and emotion. "Force a Liberal to debate the facts, not emotion and it leaves any Liberal with the loudest microphone in the loneliest port-a-potty."
TheLiberalsSuck 1 year ago
Conservatives = FAIL = universe's biggest hypocrites. They actively DEFEND unlimited CEO salaries and corporate welfare for oil, gas, nuclear, meat and many other destructive industries.
But, when taxes might need to be raised an insignificant fraction in order to force these conservatives to clean up their messes and to be held responsible for their actions - to actually do the TINIEST good - they whine and bitch and complain.
duck24x 1 year ago
If governments REALLY believe this Glo-Bull Warming bullshit then they have a duty to:
MAKE IT ILLEGAL FOR ANY BANK, CORPORATION OR INDIVIDUAL TO PROFIT FROM "SAVING THE PLANET"
These guys wont even refrain from eating meat which cause more CO2 than all the cars, planes and transpiration combined. Why?
BECAUSE IT'S A SCAM. They want profits, they want to eat meat and they want the tax payer to pay for it all.
cytuber 1 year ago
Professor Phil Jones at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit admitted
•Data for vital 'hockey stick graph' has gone missing
•There has been no global warming since 1995
•Warming periods have happened before - but NOT due to man-made changes
dailymail UK
cupera1 1 year ago
Global Warming is FRAUD. Search Climategate.
youarebeingdeceived-dotcom
youarebeingdeceived 2 years ago
You are being deceived. When you trace the research back to its origins the FRAUD claims fall apart.
Try the potholer54 channel for some really good videos.
pi3p142 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The entire north polar icecap, which has been there for most of the last 3 million years, is disappearing before our eyes.
Forty percent is already gone.
The rest is expected to go completely within the next decade.
The conditions that make human life possible are in jeopardy
Nightversionn 2 years ago
Global Warming is real, there is a University degree on Climate Change, and my brother's friend studies it. The world has increased by 1.6 degrees and the point of no return is at 2 degrees. CO2 increases the temperature, and there is 390 PPM (increasing 3-4 each year) of CO2 right now (More then the 200 ppm it should be at), the red zone is at 450 ppm and unfortunately that's coming soon. How can u argue with that.
TheLeporad 2 years ago 11
@TheLeporad How about you make alot of assumptions.
Who say's the point of no return is 2 degree's?
The earth has been alot warmer than that, and look, it returned!
How do you know the earth is supposed to be at 200 ppm? it's been well over 4000ppm and look, it returned!
Who said the red zone is 450ppm? Are you saying man cannot adapt to a 2-4ppm increase per year? Nothing you have stated is supported by science.
Just saying.
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
The world has increased by 1.6 degrees?
No, the Northern Hemisphere average of 40 weather stations in the IPCC report is +1.6
If you take the total amount of Northern hemisphere stations you get +7 at the Poles,which means little considering you are still freezing your ass off at 45f instead of 38f in the Summer,the Sub Polar is +5 on Average and the Upper temperate is +4
Actually look at mid temperate and it is -4, Lower Temperate and Subtropics is -5 and Tropics is -7 (oops)
True AGT is 15c
TheRealArchAngel 1 year ago
p.s. True AGT is 15c and has been that way for 10,000 years with the AGT switching from 13c to 14c 50,000 years ago and the word switching from 12c(Ice Age) to 13c 100,000 years ago
The Average Interglacial Peak is 18c which is long overdue(the 15c for 10,000 is the fluke in a otherwise unstable world/environment,not the norm) with the Highest peak ever being 22c(guess when)
For all their jargon and cherry picking the Earth is still 15c, they are hyping Climate zone temperature variability
TheRealArchAngel 1 year ago
@TheLeporad Old but dude, you made the worst argument for global warming. There is a college degree on it. Here you assume the most asinine thing you could: That people in college are smart or know what they are talking about. But again, warming doesn't mean we caused it, changing happens.
furlybq 1 year ago
@furlybq Depends on the college
verd12w 7 months ago
@TheLeporad Umm well. CO2 doesn't increase the temperature, and climate change is that natural order of things. It happens. It's not reversible and is not man made. Now I believe In renewable energy because Fossil fuels won't last forever. Climate fluctuates an Ice Age here a drought there yada yada yada.
EdwardMarshall1982 1 year ago
@EdwardMarshall1982 You're wrong. CO2 DOES increase the greenhose effect.Science 101 pal. Look it up.
mrbrianmccarthy 1 year ago
@mrbrianmccarthy as it is a greenhouse gas, you are 100% correct
verd12w 7 months ago
@TheLeporad yeah, thats why we are having record cold temps. oh yeah, global warming is on hold for ten years, then its coming back. Thats what the people that gave you your info, stated as fact, on hold for ten years....FAIL. The figures you are talking about are wrong, the "scientists" that were gathering that info were caught red handed keepings inaccurate records and "hiding the decline" where have you been? so how can YOU argue with THAT? LALALALALA cant hear you, just kidding, go ahead...
elrugged1 1 year ago
@elrugged1 disregarding the GLOBAL in global warming.
verd12w 7 months ago
@TheLeporad oh, and i dont care that you made that statement seven months ago, i still wanna argue with you LOL
elrugged1 1 year ago
@TheLeporad while i belive global warming exsist i dont belive MAN made global warming does! FUCKING volcanoes make more CO2 then all our factories cars and factories and cars and cars put together!! FuCKING! ROTTING PLANTS! makes more then our cars and our childrens cars !! INFACT!!! MAN MADEEE CO2 contributes to less then a percent DUMB FUCKKKKKKKK>>>ITS THE SUN
mesa134 1 year ago
@mesa134 have to agree with you on the points that more CO2 is naturally emitted than could possibly come from humans. Other than that, the extra caps and misspelled words show that you fail at thinking.
verd12w 7 months ago
@verd12w me failing at thinking does not make man made global warming any more real...and english is not my first language
mesa134 7 months ago