And, the same old question, when Roger Bannister broke the four minute mile, John Landy did it and he was followed by lots of others but the moon landings, oh no, not Russia, years in front in space exploration, not Japan with the money, the resources, the desire, [and Americas ally], and they didn't even provide us with the once and for all end to the debate pictures of the lander base, the moon buggy, the discarded detrius, in fact nothing, fuck all, sorry boys, you will have to do better.
YDDES, regolith grains, how the hell do you know what regolith grains are, did you somehow sneak on and sneak off again on landing? you are spouting parrot fashion what NASA want you to spout, think for yourself for once my friend, look at Gene Cerman's interview, look at Aldrin, Shephard and Collins [I don't recall seeing any stars] he was orbitting, and he didn't see any stars!!!!, was he also affected by the moon's surface glare?
How the hell can there be footprints in dry sand? I recently walked across Southport sandhills after a shower of rain and still couldn't produce a footprint, what am I doing wrong?
@thecubanism The "problem" is that You walked in an environment with atmospere, in sand affected by wid and water during millions of years, while the astronauts walked in vacuum, in lunar regolith, which has not been affected by wind or water. That makes a big difference, since the regolith grains are much sharper and stick to each other in a whole different way than the earthly sand.
stupid theory.... think about this... the 'shoeprint'... it's facing as if walking towards us and off to the right... shouldn't there be other prints before it? as fine as the moon dust is/was, there should be a trail of prints...even if this theory was true, there would be someone with the job to cover those prints... do you think they would leave 1 significant, prominent 'shoeprint' in the dust??
Nice photoshop but u should probably check where the light is coming from next time you dumb, gay, idiot, faggot, unamerican, homo, asshole, unholy, good for nothing piece of crap.
@mikesomething Reason we haven't been to the moon recently? Lack of funding.
Reason 40 year old cars suck now? They're old as hell and have broken down.
40 year old phone sucks? Technology still advanced. Also, previous answer.
Same goes to washing machine. Basically, just because we were at a high point then doesn't mean we can't get further. Practically the whole point of technology is advancement.
I do agree on the last part though. Old techno music sucks. =P
@mikesomething We can't fly the Concorde (or other supersonic transports) over the Atlantic today. Does that mean that all who say they have flown in Concorde in the 70's lie?
USAF can't fly the SR-71 (the fastest jet ever), today. Does that mean it didn't fly in the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's?
yes for 40 years the scientific community of every nation ON EARTH has been fooled about the moon landings but YOU know better because some other fool told you they were faked.
Bad photoshop job for starters. Anyone who believes that's real after looking at it needs their eyes checked.
And in terms of logic, IF this were real and proof of studio work, it would mean they had a 1-legged stage hand that hopped into the frame and jumped back out, because it's the only print there.
thats obviously photoshop. we will never know the truth! sure they probably went to The moon maybe they found some weird things up there.Insects out of this world.What if the other apollo missions were cancelled due to something that happened terribly wrong and maybe thats why they shut down NASA..so they couldnt bring anything back or so they lose communication with "ALIENS" them...but hey how do you know this is true? you just have to suck it up and believe what the government is telling you.
Clumsy joker Obama clearly implies the supposed authenticity of the moonlanding is an issue that doesn't matter..which is understandable since he knows it was a hoax. You may ask "Is this another B.Clinton like attempt of play down the significance of the Moon Hoax of 1969-1972 and try soften the impact ,the International embarrassment ,and the crimes associated with it?"
Funny how people are offended when confronted by the possibility that our government lies to us and our technology is not quite as advanced as we were lead to believe.
@rebelyell1865 Not offended. But all the Moon Landing Hoax theory "evidence" tend to be either busted or easily explained naturally. Still hasn't been a shred of real credible evidence to say it was a hoax.
@TheBoHoBoy As with all conspiracy theories, the burden of proof lies on the conspiracy theorist. The legal and officially accepted truth is that two men walked on the Moon in 1969. Pictures, Moon rocks and history books verify this. No serious source has ever claimed that we never went to the Moon. So, to suggest it was all a hoax, there needs to be some type of credible evidence to back it up, otherwise you're in the same boat as the birthers and FEMA campers.
@chinookking97 its called Idiocracy. all the dumb people bred children in such great amounts that the dumb masses now out number the very small amount of smart people still left on the planet.... apparently Darwinism has nothing to do with intelligence. all you need is a club and a cave...
This picture is clearly a fake. Original AS11-40-5874 does not show any "shoe print" at that spot, and is in color. Other picture of the same area, AS11-40-5875, does not show any "shoe print" either.
People here told you that already.
Fact you still didn't remove this fraudulent video after couple of years proves again what kind of scum promotes Moon hoax theory lies.
the fact that USSR tracked the shuttle and would have said if they faked it proves it was real, because at the time the competition between the two was so intense it was impossible for one to fake without the other exposing them
wow........what a jerk. and how many shooters were there at the grassy knoll? go tell this nonsense to buzz himself. and film it.now that makes a good youtube clip
@TheJomogogo Its even funnier when pathetic queers like you dont know your arse from your face! Maybe this is fake, but to believe the moon landings were real! Geeez, do you even know what the moon is!
@morgyandshoo I challange you or anyone you know to photoshop that; that is a bootprint of a standard issue U.S. ARMY Boot; the kind that was used from the Vietnam era until the uniforms changed in the middle '80s. I know, I am a veteran and I also use photoshop.
its stupid if you want to know if we landed on the moon just ask an astronaut, they hate to lie. one said its not being a traitor if you are ordered to lie and i have to agree with him he is no traiter.
My granfather has a classified photo of a used rubber hanging out of Armstrongs ass. Im not sure if its actually Armstrongs ass but its not photoshopped...its a real ass so gramps must have known something..
Cool so there was another man's footprint on the moon. Wasn't Neil Armstrong the first person on the moon? Oh! You know what?He was probably gay & took his man w/him they argued about being1st man on the moon so they land & his bf rushes & steps on the moon 1 st & snap his finger and was like what now beotch. .K I'm kidding I know it's a hoax. But how dumb do I sound? LOL ...I;m not a good story teller her but I tried, Not like the dweeb who made it common now,I'm guessing he failed photoshop
LOL lordy I thought folks with photoshop were better then this LOL. Even the angle is off, they need to do a little more research then this, maybe a few years faking big foot prints will help them a bit.
It's remarkable that the debunker have to get help in faking proofs ;) But faking images to call it a proof we know from other hoaxtards. I remember a photo taken from inside a plane. There we can see the sky above and the clouds under the plane. But the hoaxtard faked stars in the pictur to get a proof, that it is possible to take photos of stars in the daylight. A lame try similar to this here.
@TammyFayeSyndrome I feel the same way about ppl who actually believe they did land on the moon. There are so many reasons why that just could not have happened. Once you start actually looking into it, hundreds of holes in the story appear. Kind of like 9/11.
This is a well-known Photoshop done by a rather unskilled photo editor who does not trust in any particular anti-Apollo evidence and has no appreciation for truth. If anything, he has succeeded in convincing those wondering that they can't trust "hoaxheads."
Maybe the shoe was photo shopped in, fair does, but how on earth does the flag move in space like its got wind blowing through it? There is no air in space.
@Ilike2watchyavidz Thats precisely why the flag keeps waving. No air means no friction on the flag, so there's nothing acting on the flag to slow it down once it starts waving. If you bumped it, it would keep waving for a much longer time on the moon than on earth.
@wondoctorj we can't see that high of a resolution from telescopes because of turbulance and diffraction of the earths atmosphere-research it a little
No but apparently you are. There are no "close up" pictures of the moon and Mars other than those taken by Apollo or the Mars rover. God you must be stupid.
Believe me when I say, I have heard weirder and stupider things declared 'troof' in all seriousness. Like the idea that the twin towers were taken down by a dustifacation ray powered by hurricanes or that the moon landings were faked in a cavern so far deep underground that the gravity is the same as on the moon.
I do not believe we went to the moon but this pictures was FAKE. Made by either someone not capable of waiting the scepticism out or by someone deliberately trying to set us moanhoaxers up , shame on you you numbskull.
its actualy funny that the conspiracy theorists create false arguments to support their stories, whihc implies that they actualy know they are fucking wrong. dont feed the trolls!
there is more footage and proof of a landing than there is of conspiracy to show there wasnt one. what would happen if the moon landing wasnt real ? well the world will carry on spinning, you will have to go to work and you will still pay your taxes. if we did , you will still go to work etc, you get the idea. so why waste time arguing about something you will never get to the bottom of in your lifetime and get on with something more positive instead eh ?
Th whole aledged Moon landing thing was so amaturish it was laughable. NASA or the US government did not imagine for one minute that us common folk would be able to do this level of scrutiny in the not too distant future. Hey man if you believe we went to the Moon then you might as well believe in little fairies at the bottom of the garden.
The ironic thing is that one of the moon hoax supporters arguments can be used against them in the video; the shadows in the shoe-print are in the wrong direction. If that doesn't prove this is photo-shopped, the fact that the tread on the shoe is modern should.
That's because the surface of the moon reflects the sun light very strong. The astronauts were standing on giant light bulb. If you don't believe me, take a walk in the moon light and see for yourself.
Well, it's a giant foot print!
16nowhereman 1 day ago
it's a drag
RAREpicture 4 days ago
And, the same old question, when Roger Bannister broke the four minute mile, John Landy did it and he was followed by lots of others but the moon landings, oh no, not Russia, years in front in space exploration, not Japan with the money, the resources, the desire, [and Americas ally], and they didn't even provide us with the once and for all end to the debate pictures of the lander base, the moon buggy, the discarded detrius, in fact nothing, fuck all, sorry boys, you will have to do better.
thecubanism 1 week ago
YDDES, regolith grains, how the hell do you know what regolith grains are, did you somehow sneak on and sneak off again on landing? you are spouting parrot fashion what NASA want you to spout, think for yourself for once my friend, look at Gene Cerman's interview, look at Aldrin, Shephard and Collins [I don't recall seeing any stars] he was orbitting, and he didn't see any stars!!!!, was he also affected by the moon's surface glare?
,
u
thecubanism 1 week ago
@thecubanism OK. Just forget that I tried to communicate with You.
YDDES 1 week ago
How the hell can there be footprints in dry sand? I recently walked across Southport sandhills after a shower of rain and still couldn't produce a footprint, what am I doing wrong?
thecubanism 1 week ago
@thecubanism The "problem" is that You walked in an environment with atmospere, in sand affected by wid and water during millions of years, while the astronauts walked in vacuum, in lunar regolith, which has not been affected by wind or water. That makes a big difference, since the regolith grains are much sharper and stick to each other in a whole different way than the earthly sand.
YDDES 1 week ago
if that's his footstep i mean unless he has a jetpack and only one leg where the fuck are the other footprints ?
chucky85261 1 week ago
0:40 sooooo photoshopped, lool.
TheChromespy 2 weeks ago
#2 is very clear, the rest is fuzzy.
chubbyzombie666 3 weeks ago
stupid theory.... think about this... the 'shoeprint'... it's facing as if walking towards us and off to the right... shouldn't there be other prints before it? as fine as the moon dust is/was, there should be a trail of prints...even if this theory was true, there would be someone with the job to cover those prints... do you think they would leave 1 significant, prominent 'shoeprint' in the dust??
foxman82459 1 month ago
Nice photoshop but u should probably check where the light is coming from next time you dumb, gay, idiot, faggot, unamerican, homo, asshole, unholy, good for nothing piece of crap.
Bulldoghawk1 1 month ago
lol yeah we went to the moon 40 years ago lmao we cant even go now
get into a 40 year old car and see how SHIT it is, use a 40 year old telephone, and a 40 year old washing machine. they fucking suck.
no way those lying cunts got anywhere near the fucking moon with the techno they had back then.
mikesomething 2 months ago
@mikesomething Reason we haven't been to the moon recently? Lack of funding.
Reason 40 year old cars suck now? They're old as hell and have broken down.
40 year old phone sucks? Technology still advanced. Also, previous answer.
Same goes to washing machine. Basically, just because we were at a high point then doesn't mean we can't get further. Practically the whole point of technology is advancement.
I do agree on the last part though. Old techno music sucks. =P
CasaiAgicap 1 month ago
@mikesomething We can't fly the Concorde (or other supersonic transports) over the Atlantic today. Does that mean that all who say they have flown in Concorde in the 70's lie?
USAF can't fly the SR-71 (the fastest jet ever), today. Does that mean it didn't fly in the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's?
Please get some technological education.
YDDES 1 week ago
@YDDES lmao you think people cant fly planes today lol
i went on a plane last year u fucking retard
mikesomething 1 week ago
@mikesomething OK, I see. You just want to look stupid.
YDDES 1 week ago
That footprint looks fake. Ya douchebags.
actnjcksn2001 2 months ago
this type of athletic shoe pattern didn't even exist in 1969, we were still wearing tennis shoes back then
Blahblobify 2 months ago
Footprint was inserted. The original picture can be easily found online.
sglpaul 3 months ago 2
clue for next time you photoshop.
Remember which direction the light is coming from.
Iamtopcoach 3 months ago
i dont believe that we have been to moon, but that was just stupid... get a job mate
robinkhaira1 4 months ago
@robinkhaira1
yes for 40 years the scientific community of every nation ON EARTH has been fooled about the moon landings but YOU know better because some other fool told you they were faked.
Blahblobify 3 months ago
HOAX LOGIC:
"Huah-huah-huah, those Nasa monkeys blew it by photographing a different shoeprint and never bothered to remove it - strange, it is so visible here.
But anyway, huah-huah-huah Nasa apes made fools of themselves, there is no other explanation."
REAL LOGIC:
"Photoshop. Obvious."
Laurelindo 4 months ago
Bad photoshop job for starters. Anyone who believes that's real after looking at it needs their eyes checked.
And in terms of logic, IF this were real and proof of studio work, it would mean they had a 1-legged stage hand that hopped into the frame and jumped back out, because it's the only print there.
Crunchmeister 4 months ago
I bet this shoe pattern wasn't even invented at the time of the Apollo missions.
Spindry96 4 months ago 3
this fake is fake
DSLRelaxin 4 months ago
Conspiracy theories range all the way back to Adam and Eve. The snake was a conspirator ( that's where it got its name ).
paddyatacliath 4 months ago
Baaaaaaaaad photoshop
greg08817 4 months ago
Faking the shoe on a fake photograph is insane.
MrMemag 4 months ago
@MrMemag Fakeception.
LiAk0sW4y 4 months ago
thats obviously photoshop. we will never know the truth! sure they probably went to The moon maybe they found some weird things up there.Insects out of this world.What if the other apollo missions were cancelled due to something that happened terribly wrong and maybe thats why they shut down NASA..so they couldnt bring anything back or so they lose communication with "ALIENS" them...but hey how do you know this is true? you just have to suck it up and believe what the government is telling you.
member99887 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=CsNe4pTs-eo
Clumsy joker Obama clearly implies the supposed authenticity of the moonlanding is an issue that doesn't matter..which is understandable since he knows it was a hoax. You may ask "Is this another B.Clinton like attempt of play down the significance of the Moon Hoax of 1969-1972 and try soften the impact ,the International embarrassment ,and the crimes associated with it?"
The answer is yes!
potrodsas 5 months ago
This video is wrong. The biggest fake in History is the purpose of the Federal Reserve.
bestchoiceeverr 5 months ago
jejeje those are nike air footprints!
jmmarte22 5 months ago
KEEP BELIEVING THE LIES. WHEN THE INTERNET FAILS YOU WILL NOT SURVIVE.
akaredcrossbow 5 months ago
@akaredcrossbow ERM WHATS WITH THE CAPS LOCKED RHYME?
MrPypap 5 months ago
Funny how people are offended when confronted by the possibility that our government lies to us and our technology is not quite as advanced as we were lead to believe.
rebelyell1865 5 months ago
@rebelyell1865 Not offended. But all the Moon Landing Hoax theory "evidence" tend to be either busted or easily explained naturally. Still hasn't been a shred of real credible evidence to say it was a hoax.
jh30385 5 months ago
@jh30385 had no reliable evidence to say man walked on the moon either
TheBoHoBoy 5 months ago
@TheBoHoBoy As with all conspiracy theories, the burden of proof lies on the conspiracy theorist. The legal and officially accepted truth is that two men walked on the Moon in 1969. Pictures, Moon rocks and history books verify this. No serious source has ever claimed that we never went to the Moon. So, to suggest it was all a hoax, there needs to be some type of credible evidence to back it up, otherwise you're in the same boat as the birthers and FEMA campers.
jh30385 4 months ago
The photoshoper did not mach the lens blur of the original image to the footprint placed in the photo. Bad photoshop indeed.
jclaine 5 months ago
no barefooted creatures...?
emerald1one1 6 months ago
its perfectly real, both. They were in the moon. Explanation for the shoe. Chuck Norris
berny88925 6 months ago 4
just reported this fradulent video. hopefully youtube will ban it
TATTOOEDMETEOR 6 months ago
FAKE !!
raalou 6 months ago
Well, if some people can't even believe in the great achievements of their (grand-) parents, I wonder where we have gone to.
chinookking97 7 months ago
@chinookking97 its called Idiocracy. all the dumb people bred children in such great amounts that the dumb masses now out number the very small amount of smart people still left on the planet.... apparently Darwinism has nothing to do with intelligence. all you need is a club and a cave...
TakeYourProfits 2 months ago
@TakeYourProfits : You write poorly.
KenyanObama 2 months ago
nice....very nice.....eagle eye you got my friend...!!!
hypnotycul 8 months ago
yeah that looked photo shopped all the way.
groovygoolie 8 months ago
@DDejon there is about a BILLION different types of shoes in the world how do you know it is that EXACT make
Brendy127 8 months ago
First: do you really think that the United States Government would be so clumsey than to let somebody walk on the 'set' before it was filmed :L
Secondly: look at 0:26 and look at the 'shoeprint' it is obviously photoshoped and as morgyandshoo said "...a bad job at that"
Brendy127 8 months ago
This picture is clearly a fake. Original AS11-40-5874 does not show any "shoe print" at that spot, and is in color. Other picture of the same area, AS11-40-5875, does not show any "shoe print" either.
People here told you that already.
Fact you still didn't remove this fraudulent video after couple of years proves again what kind of scum promotes Moon hoax theory lies.
BlisterHiker 8 months ago 2
Why the hell would there be one single shoe footprint all by itself, and no others anywhere else?
Did the guy making the footprint fly away?
Oh dear, hoaxers just reached a new level of suckiness. <_<
Laurelindo 8 months ago 2
the fact that USSR tracked the shuttle and would have said if they faked it proves it was real, because at the time the competition between the two was so intense it was impossible for one to fake without the other exposing them
IIXtremeBoxII 9 months ago
@IIXtremeBoxII
Yeah, exactly! (:
Naatashax3 9 months ago
Huh, I wonder why that doesn't show up in the original HIGH RES photo...
PHREAK01 10 months ago
It's the footprint of Chuck Norris.
muratwhatever 10 months ago 3
its much too sharp edged for the dust of the moon. learn to fake professional, thank you.
DerErwecker 10 months ago
the landing is real but this video is stubid
confuse 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you are lying
confuse 11 months ago
You can tell from the pixels, even without seeing quite a few shops in your time.
WannaComment2 11 months ago
wow........what a jerk. and how many shooters were there at the grassy knoll? go tell this nonsense to buzz himself. and film it.now that makes a good youtube clip
desertdreg 11 months ago
OK Spion1618, give us the NASA archive number so we can download this pic and see for ourselves.
If the shoe print is not there I will photoshop it back in for you.
TheSpiritof1969 1 year ago 3
thats gotta be a huge damn studio to fake it
STATUSthesleepers 1 year ago
@STATUSthesleepers A lot of it was filmed in the open desert.
yesiamawizardjonny 11 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny YOU THINK alot of it was filmed in the desert
STATUSthesleepers 11 months ago
If you look close enough...you can see the bullshit on the tread of the boot print...the only thing missing is it kicking you in the ass.
TheFireForEffect 1 year ago
It's not Photoshop... it's as bad as a MS Paint draw...
mat060 1 year ago
LOL! Obvious photoshop.
cleer2010 1 year ago
It's funny when pathetic queers make up shit like this in order to claim the Apollo missions were fake.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@TheJomogogo Its even funnier when pathetic queers like you dont know your arse from your face! Maybe this is fake, but to believe the moon landings were real! Geeez, do you even know what the moon is!
cptfunkstar 1 year ago
lol worst fake photo shop ever. Hate America much?
topdoggoddog 1 year ago
wow learn how to photoshop
nyyankees4296 1 year ago
No need to manipulate a photo of NASA when they
have already done for you ... Do not waste your time to forge
something that has its basis as this. From Europe
MrPrince0001 1 year ago
Beethoven never exist. It was a fake. In fact he was a black women named Bonjour les Amis.
RAREpicture 1 year ago
@RAREpicture
That is rubbish, her name was Mon Fanny and she had a big bum.
3nasafakedit 1 year ago
Franchement.
RAREpicture 1 year ago
you all are so wrong..chuck norris was the first man on the moon!
Mr19841504 1 year ago
Can you say...Photoshop? And a bad job at that?
morgyandshoo 1 year ago 59
This has been flagged as spam show
@morgyandshoo "I'm from the government. And I'm here to hoax you."
Glinkaism1 1 year ago
@morgyandshoo WHY is it that when I found this photo on google, that section is cropped out??
marcjtdc 10 months ago
@morgyandshoo I challange you or anyone you know to photoshop that; that is a bootprint of a standard issue U.S. ARMY Boot; the kind that was used from the Vietnam era until the uniforms changed in the middle '80s. I know, I am a veteran and I also use photoshop.
DDejon 9 months ago
@DDejon -- The original photo doesn't have the "footprint."
The thing was definitely added.
But it may not have been added by PhotoShop. Or, if it was, it wasn't added by anyone who was very good at it. The "footprint" looks totally fake.
Look up original photo: AS11-40-5874 The whole thing is much better quality than this sucky copy with the fake footprint.
WHY do ALL of the serious "hoax theory" promoters always feel the need to LIE?
nesokretep 7 months ago 3
@nesokretep One word: Ignorance.
rickabc2000 6 months ago
wowowow this is not serious, all right , people can suspect that moon trip was a fake, but make fakes photos for invent fake evidence???
elbalajazz 1 year ago
its stupid if you want to know if we landed on the moon just ask an astronaut, they hate to lie. one said its not being a traitor if you are ordered to lie and i have to agree with him he is no traiter.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast no bud how do we teach the yonger generation about princepals when our own supposidly peers lie .NO GOVERMENT should lie.
weadone 1 year ago
looks like it floats above the image. must be a fake insert of a shoe print.
datzfast 1 year ago
that was a foot print of bruce,hes a gayleon from planet anos ,that looks like his boot print
d9andy992 1 year ago
The conspiracy theorists should leave this alone. We went to the moon period. End of story. Just like it says we went to the moon.
nobadges 1 year ago
LIAR!!! it's a photoshop work...
Rostokouban 1 year ago
My granfather has a classified photo of a used rubber hanging out of Armstrongs ass. Im not sure if its actually Armstrongs ass but its not photoshopped...its a real ass so gramps must have known something..
PsychoSpammer 1 year ago
Cool so there was another man's footprint on the moon. Wasn't Neil Armstrong the first person on the moon? Oh! You know what?He was probably gay & took his man w/him they argued about being1st man on the moon so they land & his bf rushes & steps on the moon 1 st & snap his finger and was like what now beotch. .K I'm kidding I know it's a hoax. But how dumb do I sound? LOL ...I;m not a good story teller her but I tried, Not like the dweeb who made it common now,I'm guessing he failed photoshop
plattalisha 1 year ago
this guy is trying to be serious ? trying to push this as evidence? looks like its size 16 boot or more.
Ashmansworth 1 year ago
You can see the original NASA photo, in color and sans shoeprint, at the location
/IMAGES/LARGE/GPN-2001-000012.jpg
on server
grin.hq.nasa.gov
BeSkepticalOfAll 1 year ago
Can you give the URL of the original NASA photo?
BeSkepticalOfAll 1 year ago
Worst photoshop in history... My kid using MSPaint could have done a better job... You fail at trying to debunk the moon landing.
TheUnNerved 1 year ago
LOOK AT 14:00 AND PAUSE IT YOU CAN A WIRE ON TOP OF THE ASTROUNATS BACKPACK THATS ALSO PROVE
clamer158 1 year ago
@clamer158
14.00? what video was you looking at
Ashmansworth 1 year ago
LOL lordy I thought folks with photoshop were better then this LOL. Even the angle is off, they need to do a little more research then this, maybe a few years faking big foot prints will help them a bit.
candr 1 year ago
I'd love to send the conspiracy whacko's to the moon - one way! Leave the bastards there!
nordique59 1 year ago
It's remarkable that the debunker have to get help in faking proofs ;) But faking images to call it a proof we know from other hoaxtards. I remember a photo taken from inside a plane. There we can see the sky above and the clouds under the plane. But the hoaxtard faked stars in the pictur to get a proof, that it is possible to take photos of stars in the daylight. A lame try similar to this here.
Sam67SG 1 year ago
Glad to see such obvious hoaxes, helps to discredit the Looney Tunes characters who think the moon landings never occurred. What blithering idiots!
TammyFayeSyndrome 1 year ago
@TammyFayeSyndrome I feel the same way about ppl who actually believe they did land on the moon. There are so many reasons why that just could not have happened. Once you start actually looking into it, hundreds of holes in the story appear. Kind of like 9/11.
thatstheguy07 1 year ago
@TammyFayeSyndrome Thats not to say this pic is real, obvisouly it is fake... just wanted to point that out tho.
thatstheguy07 1 year ago
They didn't even have those kind of shoes back then!
FWYGINOND 1 year ago
Too much detail on the print, nice fake tho, made me have to check the real version of that photo
harryGShunt 1 year ago
Wow so now the hoaxers need to fake their pictures in order to get their point across... pathetic and not even close to science.
“Immaturity is the incapacity to use one's intelligence without the guidance of another.”
Immanuel Kant
maffoid 1 year ago
One more footprint made in USA.
syk4ryo 1 year ago
Oh, wow! Actual proof!!!
If you look REAL close, you can see Santa's sled just above the horizon, too! I think he's so nice. I love Santa.
LazlosPlane 1 year ago
@LazlosPlane Too funny. Btw, I will offer you £5 for your bridge or are you going to gamble on ebay? Oh, whats the postage and package costs?
CoolZiggy 1 year ago
@LazlosPlane whoops, meant to say, will you be gambling on ebay. I got a little bit too excited of the thought of owning a bridge. :)
CoolZiggy 1 year ago
I forgot to add, bigfoot and nessy graffitied DL in the sand - well thats what it looks like on my monitor but it is crap.
CoolZiggy 1 year ago
I have just looked this photo up on google images - the footprint isnt there. Bigfoot must have come along with his pal Nessy to set this up
CoolZiggy 1 year ago
This is a well-known Photoshop done by a rather unskilled photo editor who does not trust in any particular anti-Apollo evidence and has no appreciation for truth. If anything, he has succeeded in convincing those wondering that they can't trust "hoaxheads."
LunarTuner 1 year ago
this hoax looks like a hoax
polyphony89 1 year ago
You Moon Loonies are pathetic.
geonerd 1 year ago
Very low quality photoshop. Try again, hoaxer.
slump75 1 year ago
hahahaha stupid
ripthejacka 1 year ago
Maybe the shoe was photo shopped in, fair does, but how on earth does the flag move in space like its got wind blowing through it? There is no air in space.
Ilike2watchyavidz 1 year ago
@Ilike2watchyavidz Thats precisely why the flag keeps waving. No air means no friction on the flag, so there's nothing acting on the flag to slow it down once it starts waving. If you bumped it, it would keep waving for a much longer time on the moon than on earth.
Darrylizer1 1 year ago
@Darrylizer1 Smd
Ilike2watchyavidz 1 year ago
LMFAO you fucking piece of fucking shit. the moon landing is real you fucking waste of fucking life, just go and fucking die you fucking cunt
BadCompany2Extreme 1 year ago
Moon hoaxers are getting desperate now they have to photoshop shit to convince themselves they are still right. Sad deluded queers.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
how hard can it be to photoshop something to a blurry dirt?
come on, man !
darkerforest 1 year ago
As for the footprint-for sure photoshop
surgemeister01 1 year ago
@wondoctorj we can't see that high of a resolution from telescopes because of turbulance and diffraction of the earths atmosphere-research it a little
surgemeister01 1 year ago
photoshop
JustB3NJI 1 year ago
photoshop
Mrxbeach 1 year ago
Howcome nobody has TELESCOPE pics of ITEMS at landing site?!!??!
WONDOCTORJ 1 year ago
@WONDOCTORJ
For the same reason nobody has telescope pics of rocks you shitwit even the Hubble can't break out anything that small on the moon
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@TheJomogogo uuhhmmm......there are TONS of close up pictures from the moon AND mars.....are u retarded?
WONDOCTORJ 1 year ago
@WONDOCTORJ
No but apparently you are. There are no "close up" pictures of the moon and Mars other than those taken by Apollo or the Mars rover. God you must be stupid.
TheJomogogo 1 year ago
@WONDOCTORJ
No, but we do have LRO photos.
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest
but but but ... obama is actually a chinese
zionist and his brothers brought all that stuff
up there just in time to bug people looking for
trooooooof - during one of their starts' quake, wtc7 collapsed as planned - now suck that. :D
lostlyrics 1 year ago
@lostlyrics Are you crazy or do you just play one on the Internet?
loperspest 1 year ago
@loperspest
"troooooof" was not hint enough ? :P o c'mon
lostlyrics 1 year ago
... and check my videos - guaranteed
troll-free zone - even the apollo movie :)
lostlyrics 1 year ago
@lostlyrics
Believe me when I say, I have heard weirder and stupider things declared 'troof' in all seriousness. Like the idea that the twin towers were taken down by a dustifacation ray powered by hurricanes or that the moon landings were faked in a cavern so far deep underground that the gravity is the same as on the moon.
loperspest 1 year ago 13
@loperspest frightening eh ? :P
but I feel with you, visiting american
(political) fora daily - unfrigginbelievable
sometimes what damage homeschooling
and similar child abuse cAn cast. see you :)
lostlyrics 1 year ago 2
learn to use photoshop ,idiot.
christopherbessenyei 1 year ago
Hahaha what a horrible fake footprint!
Nick83Fairfax 1 year ago
Yeah... This is so bad of the government
0007bondjamesbond 1 year ago
That is some of the sh*ttiest photo shopping ever - you douche!!!
atarimuseum 1 year ago
Haha, good try...but graphic artists will always get owned by maths: just run some differential filter on the image and the footprint shows up clean.
Next time, try to keep the same blur pattern of the picture...maybe I change my mind on the moon hoax :)
gonzalo060375 1 year ago
Love to think it was a conspiracy. But terrible photoshop work like this works against it.
sputniky 1 year ago
I do not believe we went to the moon but this pictures was FAKE. Made by either someone not capable of waiting the scepticism out or by someone deliberately trying to set us moanhoaxers up , shame on you you numbskull.
Syphonaptera 1 year ago
to a small step, use anything,
to a big step use Nike! Just do it, Neil!
pedrohenriquepassos 1 year ago
its actualy funny that the conspiracy theorists create false arguments to support their stories, whihc implies that they actualy know they are fucking wrong. dont feed the trolls!
detefetel12 1 year ago
We all know its a lie but the shoe is fake photo edited .. nice try though
Savage2MoGa 1 year ago
can you say doctored photo
tjnadrie 1 year ago
looks like nike to me. is nike the official shoe worn by aliens?
FartMarksInMePants 1 year ago
Yeah, according to hoax believers.
Laurelindo 1 year ago
even mexicans can fake it better.. are you peruvian Spion1618?
ddboris 1 year ago 2
there is more footage and proof of a landing than there is of conspiracy to show there wasnt one. what would happen if the moon landing wasnt real ? well the world will carry on spinning, you will have to go to work and you will still pay your taxes. if we did , you will still go to work etc, you get the idea. so why waste time arguing about something you will never get to the bottom of in your lifetime and get on with something more positive instead eh ?
DJKloop 1 year ago
Th whole aledged Moon landing thing was so amaturish it was laughable. NASA or the US government did not imagine for one minute that us common folk would be able to do this level of scrutiny in the not too distant future. Hey man if you believe we went to the Moon then you might as well believe in little fairies at the bottom of the garden.
guesser7 1 year ago
"thats one small step for a man, and one work boot print in the sand at area 51"
F4O4U4R4S 2 years ago
watch this vid watch?v=YWgXM6I_bvE& and at min 6:55 you can see the exact same picture and there's no footprint.... this is photoshoped
XRezor 2 years ago
Is this another 'Social Experiment'..?
Ofcourse we went to the moon, no doubt.
.
Rob260259 2 years ago
Find me a shoe with that kind of tread in 1969!
flytmech 2 years ago
I don´t believe they went to the Moon but that footprint has PhotoShop writen all over it.
timrocket2008 2 years ago 2
Good job,you just won the "DUMB ASS" award.
vegabaja70 2 years ago
The ironic thing is that one of the moon hoax supporters arguments can be used against them in the video; the shadows in the shoe-print are in the wrong direction. If that doesn't prove this is photo-shopped, the fact that the tread on the shoe is modern should.
rocketidiot1 2 years ago
very poorly Photoshoped scrap
you think someone will take it seriously?
74flateric 2 years ago 2
0:19
Who did this a 5 year old?
grapefruitboy 2 years ago
lol how retarded is this video?
grapefruitboy 2 years ago
You want to believe so bad that you create false info... now who's the REAL fake?!
MarcBassoFilms 2 years ago 3
Goes to show with all the technology we have now, we can't make a 40 year old moonlanding look fake
BannedSubsistence 2 years ago
FFFFFFFFFFFFAIL!
Tabramos 2 years ago
This uploader is a fucking moron.
Imat00l 2 years ago
photoshop fail
goodmd1242 2 years ago 2
That's because the surface of the moon reflects the sun light very strong. The astronauts were standing on giant light bulb. If you don't believe me, take a walk in the moon light and see for yourself.
sverebom 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
apm33909 2 years ago
I can believe shoe-prints on the moon, but the really amazing thing is how it is lit from the opposite direction as everything else.
sparkloweb 2 years ago
Wow that was a horrible photoshop job...the shoe print isnt even blended with the rest of the picture...its just overlayed lol That was really funny!
cheitman1991 2 years ago 45
@cheitman1991 yes, a horrible photoshop job!!!!
7290092 1 year ago
@cheitman1991 more like a bad "paint" job!
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago