LOL Great job! Scary thing is there are people who actually sound like what your spoofing. Really scary thing is there might be some creationist going "Yep He's got a point Amen" The really really scary thing is I hear they are actually going to start passing out Creation science degrees out in Texas.
The fact that there even needs to be some kind of discussion about him trolling or not says so much about the current state of education and the public understanding of science. Good satire D4Shawn, keep 'em coming!
@jamjar2006 "A take the piss" Oh really? For a British person you have an odd way with the English language. It's called satire one of the things, strangely we Brits are famous for.
@sacredgeometry Firstly, Im not British. Secondly, "a take the piss" is a pretty common slang term for something that may or may not involve satire. I dont know why using this phrase bothers you and your English language or why you could consider it odd, but thanks for that waste of time feedback!
@jamjar2006 For some reason your comments are taking a while to show up. Regardless, as you misunderstood what I meant I will try to be more specific. Syntactically your sentence structure was wrong. A correction would be "This is obviously a piss take" or "he is obviously taking the piss". Either make sense. Yours did not.
@sacredgeometry saying that something or someone is "a take the piss" is ANOTHER way of phrasing it where I come from so considering its slang, I wouldnt say the sentence structure is Syntactically wrong. Again..Im sorry that you felt you had to waste time by correcting it (and checking my profile to see what nationality I am).
@jamjar2006 I have many irish friends ill conferee with them about it. It is wrong syntactically. If you cant understand why then i'm not sure how to explain it. A is an indefinite article it introduces a non specific noun. So saying a take the piss implies that "take the piss" is noun as both "take" and "the" are adjectives it implies that the whole string has to be the noun. This means that a "take the piss" is a thing not an action. Which of course it isn't.
@sacredgeometry Its not an Irish thing. I live in England. Its a common saying between me, my Irish friends, and non Irish friends. I dunno why you have to ask them when im telling you.Anyway I have better things to do than argue this and I hope for your sake that you have better things to do than continue to attempt to correct people's comments on youtube.
@jamjar2006 Fair enough I was just pointing out that it sounds weird (to someone that isn't used to using that idiom in that way), if you cant understand that then as I said it's not really my problem.
@sacredgeometry Yeah It does sound weird. I agree AND i understand that. You didnt tell me it sounded weird though. The reason we're having this discussion is that you TOLD me I was wrong. Correcting someone, yeah I understand that, some people like to go around the internet feeding their ego by attempting to correct those who they think are wrong In this case, you were wrong. Had your first comment been "this sounds weird, are you sure its not "etc" we'd not be having this discussion.
@jamjar2006 Indeed, syntactically it was wrong and it wasn't through egotism it was through common sense. I don't win any prises for commenting on youtube not am I stupid enough to think that it gains me any respect or allows me to voice an opinion that will amount to anything tangible.
For the record my first comment was that it sounded a little odd.
@jamjar2006 I think you are overly sensitive and defensive. If you want to avoid people "attacking" you maybe more lucidity and clarity in your comments would help.
Ok maybe "attacking" was a strong word but I dont see the crime in commenting on a video, using what some may call "slang" but people (including you) generally understand. Generally people comment to agree, disagree etc with what a person says, not to put them down for using the "incorrect" phrase.
@sacredgeometry It was an observation, the only reason we are still talking about it is because you cant recognise that its a strange sentence structure. If you are not british then its probably the reason, I meant no offence.
@sacredgeometry Dude, Ive lived in Ireland most of my life. I now live in England. I know how to speak English and your comment "if you are not british then its probably the reason" IS pretty offensive considering Britain arent the only (or the best) English speakers in the world. I know WHY you thought what I said was wrong, but, im teling you that just because you have not heard of this variation of the common slang "to take the piss", does not mean it is, by your defenition "wrong".
@sacredgeometry "a take the piss" is also pretty common around here. I dunno what your problem is dude, but its a bit silly to go around telling someone that something is right or wrong in terms of slang
hahaha i cant tell if this guy is serious or if he's just takin the piss. either way i was almost crying with laughter at this vid. so funny my sides hurt at 3:40 - 3:48. genius.
lol. yes. evolution is a philosophy. philosophy means, "love of wisdom."
philosophy was created by the world's first atheists. the first western philosopher was a greek man named Miletus. he wanted to try to prove there was no need for any gods in order for the natural world to exist the way it does. that was back around 624-546 BCE.
i think Darwin would be pretty proud to have evolution called a love of wisdom.
Oh, and a question for any Christian that would like to answer: Why would God say that animals don't have souls (trust me he does), when Humans themselves are animals? Doesn't make sense right? Kinda like setting us up for failure? It's like people worship all their life, only to die and realize that when they die, they don't have souls, so nothing happens. Kinda fucked up right?
God never said that animals don't have souls. Animals don't have a spirit. According to Genesis 2, man was the only living created thing that God breathed into, and then became a living soul. Man has a physical body, a spirit and a soul; animals have a physical body and a soul; and plants have a physical part to them, but don't have neither a soul or a spirit.
The position of the Bible is there is a difference. It is only evolution that says man is an evolved animal.
@DeaconCliff I can answer all of these questions right now, in one simple sentence. If evolutionists should have to accept some Christian ideals, shouldn't Christians have to accept some of the science towards Evolution?
what are some that you think we should accept? I think it is the opposite. I don't think enough of Science gives scientists who don't believe in evolution the same platform and opportunity to present the contradictory evidence. These are not the voices of Christian scientists, but simply scientist in their own field who simply think evolutionary thought is simply ridiculous.
@DeaconCliff And I don't think that Christianity gives scientists who believe in evolution the same platform and opportunity to present the contradictory evidence. The fact of the matter is that you cannot prove the creation theory. It's impossible to prove. But there is science that can almost prove evolution. It's not 100% yet, but it will be one day, and when that day comes I will laugh in the face of every Christian I know.
@PolkTheSwimmer I personally represent a huge minority of Christians as I say this, but I for one am very interested in discussing these issues, even debating many of these topics. Most Christians simply do not think on these things nor discuss them, and may even put you in a single category of atheist. Meanwhile I think it is important to note, many who examine the evidence of evolution and believe in it, have come to the strong conclusion that there absolutely must be a God who arrange...
these events. The miraculousness of the evolutionary process, and the (what they consider) billions of years of random and chance happenings, is far too great for them to consider it mere strokes of luck. Evolutionary theory contrary to popular belief does not mean there is no God; it simply is another explanation instead of Genesis 1:1 - Genesis 2:26. So it is very possible to believe that there is a creator God who we are all accountable to, and the belief that Science shows we evolved...
is it fair for me to assume that you have nothing against there being a God, but don't believe in Genesis 1 and 2? i.e Creationism? Is it fair for me to assume also that you understand you can agree with the science that points towards evolution being true, but that does not mean anything in respect to whether or not there actually is a God? I ask these questions not because I believe that, but I know many atheists have been mis represented by us Christians in the past. I for one repent of that.
@DeaconCliff well, you can't be a christian and accept evolution cause that's contradicting to the first page in the bible, lol. But you can certainly believe in a creator and evolution. (Unless you're cherry picking the bible like every single christian).
it's funny (at times) how you can have an atheist who claims to believe in evolution, and then when you throw the curve ball that it actually takes more faith to believe we evolved, then to believe Genesis 1:1, it should not be surprising that there are actually many out there who believe in evolution and there being a God. You can easily see why they WANT evolution to be true, if it automatically means there is no God. Turn the table a little bit, and you see what is in...
.... many atheists hearts. It is not that the so called evidence leads them to believe evolution to be true, as it is they simply WANT the theory to be true.
@DeaconCliff uhm, atheists and evolution have pretty little in common, evolution is true because evolution is true, it's based on evidence, observation, testing... it's a fact, it's not something to believe or not believe like a 2000 year old fairy tale. You can't choose to believe in gravity, but you can deny or accept it, no matter how stupid it is. Evoluton doesn't take faith because it's evidence based and proven, things that take faith are f.ex The (not so holy) Bible.
@DeaconCliff Ohh silly simple minded christian, go in your corner of ignorance and let the intelgent athiests and christians alike do this crazy thing called science and quickly improve the world so that you can reap the benefits. Intellectual pedants like yourself are just laughable when they try to assert a mythology to be true and degredate a scientific theory. (btw gravity is a theory and so is electricity)
@calus14 Have it your way then my friend. Believe what you will. I wish you all the best in 2011. Happy New Year, and I hope you had a very merry Christmas
(if you happen to celebrate) :) Both to you and your family.
@DeaconCliff as I said, you can believe in god and evolution, but you can't be a christian, or accept the bible as truth and believe evolution, cause that contradicts eachother. But you may believe in whatever else magical man and accept evolution to be true, it's not that hard.
@DeaconCliff yep I do, I celebrate the old pagan tradition of christmas, actually called "yule" which we in Norway call "jul"... we decorate the three, gather the family and so on. So merry christmas for you too.
Awesome Geometr... uuhh.. geotherm.... uhhh thermodynam.... uhhh theological!!! that is it! Theoloticate lesson! uuuhhh ... I did check with my microscop... [no, it is not a telescope, that is too look at germs.. .sorry, that was my friend saying you were wrong... dang you are right... write ... ] say hi to samson!
When atheists says that creationists don't understand evolution, what they really mean is that they cannot provide and concrete, reliable evidence for evolution so it's just easier to call creationists retarded for refusing to believe something that makes no sense and is retarded itself.
Doubt you understand it. I studied it in high school for like 2 months and it's complex. it takes time to understand all the science involved. And it makes sense. You're retarded for thinking evolution is retarded.
@SoldierOfChrist110 The evidence is waiting for you to find it, it shouldn't be too hard. I mean only 100% of the peer reviewed scientific community supports, reviews, and studies evolution, it's been proven for years now. Besides, it isn't my job to educate you, You have to do that yourself. I gave up trying to teach theists anything a long time ago, as most of you only hear what you want to hear. In the end it really doesn't matter to me what you believe. I'm tolerant like that :)
Evolution has never been proven and never will be. Scientists can only speculate and give foolish assumptions. They cannot prove something that is suppose to take millions of years lol. Logic and common sense will not allow me to believe in evolution no matter how much scientists lie about the "evidence" which is only speculation.
@SoldierOfChrist110 Is that what you've been told? Have you even looked into it yourself, or read any scientific peer reviewed articles? If you're going to argue a given position at least be intellectually honest with yourself. I'd like to ask: which part of it would be speculation? The fossil record? documented and preserved transitional forms? or perhaps it's the DNA evidence? Which part would you tally to be a mere assumption? Come on seriously. Let's get real. At least honestly look into it
The fossil record and DNA don't prove anything. It's all speculation. I have a brain of my own and I have done my own research. Evolution has never been proven. If you want to be gulliable then go ahead.
@SoldierOfChrist110 So, The transitional forms and the fact that we share most of our DNA with other creatures doesn't suggest anything to you? Really? You would have to wonder why, people would go to schools for years, provide funding for research material, and waste so much of their time on a given subject, if it were so blatantly obvious that it were untrue (Or just speculation as you call it) I would find it strange that some of the greatest minds on earth all agree with this subject aswell.
If you want to talk about willfull ignorance just take a look at evolutionists. But let me correct you about DNA. A car, motor bike, and a truck all share similar things--all have wheels, brakes, fuel, gears etc, but yet they were made seperate. The fact that humans share similar DNA proves to me that we were made by the same Creator. In no way does it prove we evolved from each other because macro evolution has never been observed or proven.
@SoldierOfChrist110 Funny how creationists use examples of the non living to refer to the living. "DNA proves to me that we were made by the same Creator." Are you stating that because we share DNA with non human creatures, it is more likely that your god (Who never mentioned anything about DNA in the bible) uses DNA as a way to distinguish organisms from one another for no apparent reason, than it is likely that a scientific theory that has been studied for 150 years is valid?
@SoldierOfChrist110 ....Simply because it contradicts whats taught in your religious book? And yet again, you seem to have no problem undermining a theory with many many years of hard work, support, and evidence to back it up (This will not change; weather you believe it or not). And on top of that, you take the smallest piece of evidence for evolution (DNA) and claim that your god simply made it that way, for no apparent reason? Hard to believe someone can be so closed minded.
My belief does not contradict science. If somebody designed a motor bike, a truck, and a car, he/she would use very similar elements for each object but yet they were still made seperate. Why in the world does God need to mention DNA in the Bible? Scientists even admit that they can't get to the origin of life, so why not focus on this? Scientists cannot solve the huge gas in evolution and yet they still expect us to accept evolution as a fact. Thanks but no thanks.
@SoldierOfChrist110 You are yet again using Non living materials and then comparing them with life. "Scientists even admit that they can't get to the origin of life, so why not focus on this? " I guess you missed the whole study of Abiogenesis eh?"Scientists cannot solve the huge gas in evolution " And this comment leaves me wondering if you've really done any research at all. In any case, i really don't care.As i doubt you are open to anything other than what you choose to believe.I'm done here
I was making a point that having similar DNA doesn't prove evolution whatsoever because there are many things in the world that share very similar things but yet they were made seperate. It's not what I chose to believe, it's what evidence, logic, and common sense tells me. If scientists are determined to reject the idea that God created all life then they will never get to the origin of life, because you cannot get intelligent design without a designer.
@SoldierOfChrist110 If our bodies and the world are the best an all powerful god can come up with, then i am dumbfounded. our DNA isn't just similar, 98% of exactly the same as apes, even down to our very genome. If it's so evident and logical that a supernatural force created everything, then surely there must be several peer reviewed scientific journals on the study of it all, If you have any, i'll be glad to look. And no scientist set out to reject god, they simply study what is out there...
Well, who else could create such a huge and awsome universe? Who else could create the human brain or the human eye? Only God could do that. The fact that you don't appreciate his awsome creation isn't my problem. So what if apes share very similar DNA. That's how God made them. But I also rwad somewhere that apes do not infact share 98% of human DNA. I hear all kind of bizarre theories from scientists. I don't trust everything they say.
@SoldierOfChrist110 So you're assuming that your specific god could be the only possible cause for intelligence? as well as making it seem as if humans and apes are related through DNA (for no apparent reason) and then not mention it in the very book he would expect us to base our lives on? Wtf? The brain, eyes and many more aspects of the human body have been found to be explained by evolution down the biological level. ( even if you don't believe so, it's still an accepted fact)
For over 1,500 years many different people who didn't even know each other all wrote about the same God, but none of them needed to talk about DNA because everything was created. There was zero reason to talk about DNA. What's your point? And the aspects of the human body have only been explained by scientists in their own bizarre theory and speculation, but no concrete evidence, just their own foolish assumptions.
@SoldierOfChrist110 However due to your previous comment, you've shown yourself to be intellectually lazy, aswell as confirming my idea that you had no interest in learning anything that does not comply with your religion. Now that we have that established, there is no point in talking to you.
@SoldierOfChrist110 Cont. and what has been found. Furthermore when were we talking about the origin of life? I thought we were only talking about evolution (The explanation of the abundance of life on the planet) I doubt you even know the basics of the very thing you reject (as shown in your comment) And lastly heres the thing about intelligent design: even if it were proven,you would still have to present evidence as to why that intelligence came from your specific god, and not any other cause
@SoldierOfChrist110 I contend that, deep down, you really aren't being honest with me nor yourself, and are desperately clinging to whatever the like of ray comfort and co. tell you because you want to protect those beliefs of yours from even the smallest bit of scrutiny. It is a cowardly position to be in. Nonetheless; as i said before. In the end. it makes no difference to me what you choose to believe. It only pains me to see someone so willfully ignorant.
Why do you come to videos and re-start the same arguments you've already lost? The evidence is all there, this isn't even a question in science, only creationists doubt evolution and it's not a scientific doubt.
Your problem is that you think science is a tool which atheists are using to kill God.
Science makes us discover all the law of physics, law of inertia, law of gravity, etc.
The universe & the earth does not came by chance or probability. Scientist now argue coz all evidence points to a product of design. Their factor rate came to that conclusion. If by design, question is why? for what purpose? and by whom?
@ mystic. Mathematics is logical progression of symbols and concepts. The real world is often explained in those numbers and concepts. It isn't a physical science. But it isn't just "numbers".
Just think also that Darwin did not invent evolution it was thought of before by the greek philosophers. He may have made money fro it and hitler exploited it
I do not understand sir, this is a very good report from a seemingly well educated gentleman. I will pass his clear logic to the members of my church who need a defense against those who do not support the creationist concept. Just think creation is not a dirty word - but it may be posited as such
Now you simply can not argue with such a well reasoned, scientific analysis like that! Certainly no illiterate buffoon could have articulated it so masterfully.
This is serious church stuff brother. This guy seems very knowledgeable to me at least. I have shown this to my family and they approve. Please write to us so we can make application to the "Creationist University". I feel that there should be more talks like this on youtube to balance the atheistic evolutionists theory. Remember it is a theory people, a theory!
@pietrrocks because those atheistic theorems "sir", are what actually extends our lives today. Not to mention he used it in the video to prove god, so apparently they're not atheistic lolz.
Thankyou sir for your wonderful wise views. We appreciate it very much and I am happy to subscribe - your views make a lot of sense to myself and my family
@Nerdykid1017 How's about endogenous retroviruses, the fossil record, carbon ,and radiometric dating, pretty much any honest geneticist or bioligist who knows what they're talking about or just some common sense. Creation is pretty much unanimously rejected in main stream science everywhere. Your a joke, a fraud, a charlatan, I'm not looking up YET ANOTHER article that makes no fucking sense only to YET AGAIN conclude that you people compartmentalize or are just plain stupid.
@ZachVMNTX1 in the fossil record, we have found human fossils, human artifacts like hammers, fossilized human footprints(i.e., The Delk Track) and young dinosaur fossils. in 2007, we even found dinosaur TISSUE from a t. rex leg tendon and when they stretched it, the tendons snapped BACK INTO PLACE. that stuff was fresh dude. the newscast in on youtube. radiocarbon dating cn only go back a few thousand years. they don't use it for earth or fossils. and the dinosaur origins thing is a vid series.
@Nerdykid1017 Yes, they don't use carbon dating back to millions of years, and if you'd read his reply to you he said radiometric dating, not carbon dating. The claim about the tendons snapping back into place is just that, a claim, no evidence outside creationist sites claiming it happened and no links to which dig or any of the people involved, let alone a peer-reviewed journal article. p.s human footprints may be preserved but never fossilized. Totally different process.
@archapmangcmg radio metric dating doesn't go back in the millions either. and no, the trex tissue is real. it aired on the news on Dec. 16, 2007. THE NEWSCAST IS ON YOUTUBE lookitup. and it was discovered by a team of all evolutionary scientists(who were baffled BTW). and yes, the footprints were fossilized and that disproves evolution. look up the delk track.
@Nerdykid1017 Oops this wasn't in 2007 but 2005, it was the claim popularized by the fraudster Kent Hovind, and debunked in the same year. There was zero soft tissue discovered, there was the remnants of some compounds that are in blood. Footprints can't be fossilized, because fossilization is the replacement of original materials. Footprints are a displacement of material, not made of anything in particular. That the footprint is hardened and preserved is unlikely but not impossible.
@Nerdykid1017 For the delk track, there's a post on pharyngula which exposes the fake. For your claim about radiometric dating, there's all the Uranium-Lead dating, along with dozens of other cross-checks. Even a 2minute visit to wikipedia will provide a list of methods and references for them. Such a trivial effort required to dispel that fantasy.
@Nerdykid1017 Okay DUDE carbon dating works up to 58- 62, 000 years I know this , hence the reason why I mentioned radiometric dating... and even if you where an expert an tissues rate of decay I'd doubt you where telling the truth about it. So please don't teach creation in our schools and I won't think in your church.
@Nerdykid1017 Maybe you should use your time to study facts, not hand-me-down myths and lies from the same kinds of people that lie cheat and steal while claiming to be moral? I guarantee, you'll find a far more amazing universe in reality than in the Bible and every other ancient superstition. We've got more stars than you could ever count one by one in each galaxy, each of them fusion furnaces shouting out "I am here!". We have realms of intense heat and cold, light and darkness.Reality rocks.
@Nerdykid1017 For much the same reason the Bible also says it's good to sacrifice your daughter for victory in a war of conquest, that beating your slaves within an inch of their lives is fine, that if you rape a woman you have to marry her, etc. They made it up for their own convenience, in a time when slavery, genocide and misogyny were all viewed as normal. That they made up other crap about the glory of the universe means exactly nothing when they didn't know about them.
@Nerdykid1017 Well if you really don't know about it then why are you preaching something you don't know? You've just succeeded in looking like an idiot. Please learn the facts and don't contribute to the "Holy Men" poisoning young minds with their psuedo scientific garbage.
@ZachVMNTX1 i never said i didn't know about it i'm just saying im too young to have a job. what do you think ive been doing all year that's related to this topic. TRYING TO LEARN THE FACTS.
@Nerdykid1017 Well typically trying to learn with ignorance and arrogance isn't the best approach. You should try to base your world view on the facts given to you, not your facts on your preconceived world view. That's what I did three years ago.
@Nerdykid1017 Not Direct, enough credible sources are sufficient, however I believe that all our morals and values should be forged, on what we know and live now. And I believe if knowledge passed down fails testing it should be discarded, only to be remembered as the wrong answer.
@ZachVMNTX1 but if you beleive in evolution, you cant have morals witout being self-refuting to your worldview. if evry1 forges their own morals, then no1 should b punished.that would justify 9/11,theholocaust,ect. a nobody if were just evolved animals. you wouldn't scold a lion for hunting an antelope! you teach these things in schools and that were just chemical accidents, and you wonder why so many shootings happen in schools. just a chem. accident getin rid of another, wats da problem?
@Nerdykid1017 THe problem is we all have some mutual interest in living long happy lives. And if you want to live in a society benefiting from the works of others you need to respect them, and find a way to live peacefully. Also it's merely a good idea to stand up together as a group against a threat. However I dream we could all live together peacefully naive I know. BUt the point is sure you can be an animal go out in the wild and do it you want civilized life play by the rules or Gtfo.
@Nerdykid1017 Why should I base all my beliefs in how I got here? I base them on what will make me happy. It's like saying I got here in a car it cannot go up stairs neither should I. And it most certainly doesn't for humans. Evolution is about different traits winning out over each other. I'm trying compassion, and sympathy. You completely misread the value of evolution in my life it's the how not the why or the who. YOu may perceive it that way but you've never had to decide your own morals .
@ZachVMNTX1 so its what makes you happy? hitlers actions made him happy. osama bin ladens actions made him happy. school shootings made the shooters happy. so you don't think something is wrong with that?
@Nerdykid1017 It's what makes everyone happy. And FYI everything you mentioned but the school shootings where based in nationalism, or religion or both. Hitler when you get to him in history class had some pretty fucked up motives. There's tonnes of mentally ill and sick people out there, But most people religious or not do have a sense of right or wrong. And don't forget hitler may have been an atheist but mainly christians did his bidding, and they embraced the same ideals that he did.
@ZachVMNTX1 Originally I would imply the argument was lost the moment that we understood what a star was and that the earth was not at the center of the universe.
God took 3 days to make one planet called earth and yet only one day to create all the rest of the stars in the sky.......think about that one.
The bible does show it's age as a first century text.
@ZachVMNTX1 I have a few questions for you. I hope you don't mind the amount of them.
do you believe that we (man) are at the end of the evolutionary scale? Yes or no? If yes, do you see the evolutionary process making our world better for us to live in? Yes or no? If no, why not? Is man getting better in the very general sense? Are you encouraged about what the world will look like in lets say 10 years from now in 2020? If yes great, if no, why not?
haha...does a tight ass fart at the start then,"Hae ereybody,dick burn wood er" hahaha
imnofun1 1 year ago
LOL Great job! Scary thing is there are people who actually sound like what your spoofing. Really scary thing is there might be some creationist going "Yep He's got a point Amen" The really really scary thing is I hear they are actually going to start passing out Creation science degrees out in Texas.
seeker6789 1 year ago
WINRAR @ TROLLING. Thumbs up for the nublets.
valkyrie034 1 year ago
lol
squeezycheeseypeas 1 year ago
The fact that there even needs to be some kind of discussion about him trolling or not says so much about the current state of education and the public understanding of science. Good satire D4Shawn, keep 'em coming!
83Hammerhead 1 year ago
no redneck could string so many big words together in one sentence.satire.
stratocaster539 1 year ago
Is he trolling? Please say he is.
Swordply 1 year ago
@Swordply you really cannot figure that out yourself?
D1sTuRbiA 1 year ago
@Swordply He's trolling. Lol.
BoydTheMilkmanX 1 year ago
Is he trolling?
Swordply 1 year ago
Wait, is this guy a poe?! Mad props if so, great job!!
AnonymLonen 1 year ago
Comment removed
AnonymLonen 1 year ago
is this serious or is it a joke?
insidejokesarelame 1 year ago
"It's been kind of a long time since i studied geography" HAHAHAH XD!
Fucking genious.
TurtleyPompato 1 year ago
This guy is a bad actor. This is obviously a take the piss.
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 "A take the piss" Oh really? For a British person you have an odd way with the English language. It's called satire one of the things, strangely we Brits are famous for.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry Firstly, Im not British. Secondly, "a take the piss" is a pretty common slang term for something that may or may not involve satire. I dont know why using this phrase bothers you and your English language or why you could consider it odd, but thanks for that waste of time feedback!
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 For some reason your comments are taking a while to show up. Regardless, as you misunderstood what I meant I will try to be more specific. Syntactically your sentence structure was wrong. A correction would be "This is obviously a piss take" or "he is obviously taking the piss". Either make sense. Yours did not.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry saying that something or someone is "a take the piss" is ANOTHER way of phrasing it where I come from so considering its slang, I wouldnt say the sentence structure is Syntactically wrong. Again..Im sorry that you felt you had to waste time by correcting it (and checking my profile to see what nationality I am).
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 I have many irish friends ill conferee with them about it. It is wrong syntactically. If you cant understand why then i'm not sure how to explain it. A is an indefinite article it introduces a non specific noun. So saying a take the piss implies that "take the piss" is noun as both "take" and "the" are adjectives it implies that the whole string has to be the noun. This means that a "take the piss" is a thing not an action. Which of course it isn't.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry Its not an Irish thing. I live in England. Its a common saying between me, my Irish friends, and non Irish friends. I dunno why you have to ask them when im telling you.Anyway I have better things to do than argue this and I hope for your sake that you have better things to do than continue to attempt to correct people's comments on youtube.
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 *confer
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 Fair enough I was just pointing out that it sounds weird (to someone that isn't used to using that idiom in that way), if you cant understand that then as I said it's not really my problem.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry Yeah It does sound weird. I agree AND i understand that. You didnt tell me it sounded weird though. The reason we're having this discussion is that you TOLD me I was wrong. Correcting someone, yeah I understand that, some people like to go around the internet feeding their ego by attempting to correct those who they think are wrong In this case, you were wrong. Had your first comment been "this sounds weird, are you sure its not "etc" we'd not be having this discussion.
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 Indeed, syntactically it was wrong and it wasn't through egotism it was through common sense. I don't win any prises for commenting on youtube not am I stupid enough to think that it gains me any respect or allows me to voice an opinion that will amount to anything tangible.
For the record my first comment was that it sounded a little odd.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry yeah but you were also trying to arrogantly attack me by making a smart ass comment.
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 I think you are overly sensitive and defensive. If you want to avoid people "attacking" you maybe more lucidity and clarity in your comments would help.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
Ok maybe "attacking" was a strong word but I dont see the crime in commenting on a video, using what some may call "slang" but people (including you) generally understand. Generally people comment to agree, disagree etc with what a person says, not to put them down for using the "incorrect" phrase.
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 where are you from?
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry It was an observation, the only reason we are still talking about it is because you cant recognise that its a strange sentence structure. If you are not british then its probably the reason, I meant no offence.
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry Dude, Ive lived in Ireland most of my life. I now live in England. I know how to speak English and your comment "if you are not british then its probably the reason" IS pretty offensive considering Britain arent the only (or the best) English speakers in the world. I know WHY you thought what I said was wrong, but, im teling you that just because you have not heard of this variation of the common slang "to take the piss", does not mean it is, by your defenition "wrong".
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@jamjar2006 FYI The common expression is "taking the piss" ..."piss take" or to "take the piss."
sacredgeometry 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry or "a piss take" ....for a British person you have an odd way with the English language.
jamjar2006 1 year ago
@sacredgeometry "a take the piss" is also pretty common around here. I dunno what your problem is dude, but its a bit silly to go around telling someone that something is right or wrong in terms of slang
jamjar2006 1 year ago
hahaha i cant tell if this guy is serious or if he's just takin the piss. either way i was almost crying with laughter at this vid. so funny my sides hurt at 3:40 - 3:48. genius.
ThePaganSamurai 1 year ago
lol. yes. evolution is a philosophy. philosophy means, "love of wisdom."
philosophy was created by the world's first atheists. the first western philosopher was a greek man named Miletus. he wanted to try to prove there was no need for any gods in order for the natural world to exist the way it does. that was back around 624-546 BCE.
i think Darwin would be pretty proud to have evolution called a love of wisdom.
alixinthemiddle 1 year ago
0:57 vast minority...lol...oxi moron
liljimmylv 1 year ago
Hubble Microscope ftw, funniest vid Ive seen in a long time, this guy's a genius?! :)
papab34r 1 year ago
The Hubble Microscope for looking into space!!! lol, this guy's hilarious...
arisbarbieri 1 year ago 2
@XxFightinDirtyxX Abiogenesis, Look that up in a dictionary I dare you, if you own one.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
is this guy for real?
timesizwierd 1 year ago
Unfortunately, there are millions of real people similar to this character. Funny.
manmadesounds 1 year ago
this is a satirical video
hayleyfoxi 1 year ago
Is this guy an idiot? Ha.
Oh, and a question for any Christian that would like to answer: Why would God say that animals don't have souls (trust me he does), when Humans themselves are animals? Doesn't make sense right? Kinda like setting us up for failure? It's like people worship all their life, only to die and realize that when they die, they don't have souls, so nothing happens. Kinda fucked up right?
PolkTheSwimmer 1 year ago
@PolkTheSwimmer
God never said that animals don't have souls. Animals don't have a spirit. According to Genesis 2, man was the only living created thing that God breathed into, and then became a living soul. Man has a physical body, a spirit and a soul; animals have a physical body and a soul; and plants have a physical part to them, but don't have neither a soul or a spirit.
The position of the Bible is there is a difference. It is only evolution that says man is an evolved animal.
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
@DeaconCliff I can answer all of these questions right now, in one simple sentence. If evolutionists should have to accept some Christian ideals, shouldn't Christians have to accept some of the science towards Evolution?
PolkTheSwimmer 1 year ago
@PolkTheSwimmer
what are some that you think we should accept? I think it is the opposite. I don't think enough of Science gives scientists who don't believe in evolution the same platform and opportunity to present the contradictory evidence. These are not the voices of Christian scientists, but simply scientist in their own field who simply think evolutionary thought is simply ridiculous.
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
@DeaconCliff And I don't think that Christianity gives scientists who believe in evolution the same platform and opportunity to present the contradictory evidence. The fact of the matter is that you cannot prove the creation theory. It's impossible to prove. But there is science that can almost prove evolution. It's not 100% yet, but it will be one day, and when that day comes I will laugh in the face of every Christian I know.
PolkTheSwimmer 1 year ago
@PolkTheSwimmer I personally represent a huge minority of Christians as I say this, but I for one am very interested in discussing these issues, even debating many of these topics. Most Christians simply do not think on these things nor discuss them, and may even put you in a single category of atheist. Meanwhile I think it is important to note, many who examine the evidence of evolution and believe in it, have come to the strong conclusion that there absolutely must be a God who arrange...
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
Comment removed
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
these events. The miraculousness of the evolutionary process, and the (what they consider) billions of years of random and chance happenings, is far too great for them to consider it mere strokes of luck. Evolutionary theory contrary to popular belief does not mean there is no God; it simply is another explanation instead of Genesis 1:1 - Genesis 2:26. So it is very possible to believe that there is a creator God who we are all accountable to, and the belief that Science shows we evolved...
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
is it fair for me to assume that you have nothing against there being a God, but don't believe in Genesis 1 and 2? i.e Creationism? Is it fair for me to assume also that you understand you can agree with the science that points towards evolution being true, but that does not mean anything in respect to whether or not there actually is a God? I ask these questions not because I believe that, but I know many atheists have been mis represented by us Christians in the past. I for one repent of that.
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
@DeaconCliff well, you can't be a christian and accept evolution cause that's contradicting to the first page in the bible, lol. But you can certainly believe in a creator and evolution. (Unless you're cherry picking the bible like every single christian).
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@xxRockst4r
it's funny (at times) how you can have an atheist who claims to believe in evolution, and then when you throw the curve ball that it actually takes more faith to believe we evolved, then to believe Genesis 1:1, it should not be surprising that there are actually many out there who believe in evolution and there being a God. You can easily see why they WANT evolution to be true, if it automatically means there is no God. Turn the table a little bit, and you see what is in...
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
.... many atheists hearts. It is not that the so called evidence leads them to believe evolution to be true, as it is they simply WANT the theory to be true.
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
@DeaconCliff uhm, atheists and evolution have pretty little in common, evolution is true because evolution is true, it's based on evidence, observation, testing... it's a fact, it's not something to believe or not believe like a 2000 year old fairy tale. You can't choose to believe in gravity, but you can deny or accept it, no matter how stupid it is. Evoluton doesn't take faith because it's evidence based and proven, things that take faith are f.ex The (not so holy) Bible.
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@DeaconCliff Ohh silly simple minded christian, go in your corner of ignorance and let the intelgent athiests and christians alike do this crazy thing called science and quickly improve the world so that you can reap the benefits. Intellectual pedants like yourself are just laughable when they try to assert a mythology to be true and degredate a scientific theory. (btw gravity is a theory and so is electricity)
calus14 1 year ago
@calus14 Have it your way then my friend. Believe what you will. I wish you all the best in 2011. Happy New Year, and I hope you had a very merry Christmas
(if you happen to celebrate) :) Both to you and your family.
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
@DeaconCliff as I said, you can believe in god and evolution, but you can't be a christian, or accept the bible as truth and believe evolution, cause that contradicts eachother. But you may believe in whatever else magical man and accept evolution to be true, it's not that hard.
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
@xxRockst4r
ok then, fine then, happy New Year, and I hope you had a very merry Christmas (if you happen to celebrate) :)
Both to you and your family.
DeaconCliff 1 year ago
@DeaconCliff yep I do, I celebrate the old pagan tradition of christmas, actually called "yule" which we in Norway call "jul"... we decorate the three, gather the family and so on. So merry christmas for you too.
xxRockst4r 1 year ago
Awesome Geometr... uuhh.. geotherm.... uhhh thermodynam.... uhhh theological!!! that is it! Theoloticate lesson! uuuhhh ... I did check with my microscop... [no, it is not a telescope, that is too look at germs.. .sorry, that was my friend saying you were wrong... dang you are right... write ... ] say hi to samson!
Love the sarcasm. :-)
metaloceno 1 year ago
The sad thing is, most creationists dont even understand how evolution works. They're retarded.
hayleyfoxi 1 year ago
@hayleyfoxi
When atheists says that creationists don't understand evolution, what they really mean is that they cannot provide and concrete, reliable evidence for evolution so it's just easier to call creationists retarded for refusing to believe something that makes no sense and is retarded itself.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110
Doubt you understand it. I studied it in high school for like 2 months and it's complex. it takes time to understand all the science involved. And it makes sense. You're retarded for thinking evolution is retarded.
hayleyfoxi 1 year ago
@hayleyfoxi
Evolution IS retarded. It is not real science, but just smoke and mirrors. Evolution is a lie from hell.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 Sad un-educated sheep.
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
Blah blah blah, instead of making insults why don't you give some evidence for your evolution fairy tale?
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 The evidence is waiting for you to find it, it shouldn't be too hard. I mean only 100% of the peer reviewed scientific community supports, reviews, and studies evolution, it's been proven for years now. Besides, it isn't my job to educate you, You have to do that yourself. I gave up trying to teach theists anything a long time ago, as most of you only hear what you want to hear. In the end it really doesn't matter to me what you believe. I'm tolerant like that :)
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
Evolution has never been proven and never will be. Scientists can only speculate and give foolish assumptions. They cannot prove something that is suppose to take millions of years lol. Logic and common sense will not allow me to believe in evolution no matter how much scientists lie about the "evidence" which is only speculation.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 Is that what you've been told? Have you even looked into it yourself, or read any scientific peer reviewed articles? If you're going to argue a given position at least be intellectually honest with yourself. I'd like to ask: which part of it would be speculation? The fossil record? documented and preserved transitional forms? or perhaps it's the DNA evidence? Which part would you tally to be a mere assumption? Come on seriously. Let's get real. At least honestly look into it
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
The fossil record and DNA don't prove anything. It's all speculation. I have a brain of my own and I have done my own research. Evolution has never been proven. If you want to be gulliable then go ahead.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 So, The transitional forms and the fact that we share most of our DNA with other creatures doesn't suggest anything to you? Really? You would have to wonder why, people would go to schools for years, provide funding for research material, and waste so much of their time on a given subject, if it were so blatantly obvious that it were untrue (Or just speculation as you call it) I would find it strange that some of the greatest minds on earth all agree with this subject aswell.
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
If you want to talk about willfull ignorance just take a look at evolutionists. But let me correct you about DNA. A car, motor bike, and a truck all share similar things--all have wheels, brakes, fuel, gears etc, but yet they were made seperate. The fact that humans share similar DNA proves to me that we were made by the same Creator. In no way does it prove we evolved from each other because macro evolution has never been observed or proven.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 Funny how creationists use examples of the non living to refer to the living. "DNA proves to me that we were made by the same Creator." Are you stating that because we share DNA with non human creatures, it is more likely that your god (Who never mentioned anything about DNA in the bible) uses DNA as a way to distinguish organisms from one another for no apparent reason, than it is likely that a scientific theory that has been studied for 150 years is valid?
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 ....Simply because it contradicts whats taught in your religious book? And yet again, you seem to have no problem undermining a theory with many many years of hard work, support, and evidence to back it up (This will not change; weather you believe it or not). And on top of that, you take the smallest piece of evidence for evolution (DNA) and claim that your god simply made it that way, for no apparent reason? Hard to believe someone can be so closed minded.
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
My belief does not contradict science. If somebody designed a motor bike, a truck, and a car, he/she would use very similar elements for each object but yet they were still made seperate. Why in the world does God need to mention DNA in the Bible? Scientists even admit that they can't get to the origin of life, so why not focus on this? Scientists cannot solve the huge gas in evolution and yet they still expect us to accept evolution as a fact. Thanks but no thanks.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 You are yet again using Non living materials and then comparing them with life. "Scientists even admit that they can't get to the origin of life, so why not focus on this? " I guess you missed the whole study of Abiogenesis eh?"Scientists cannot solve the huge gas in evolution " And this comment leaves me wondering if you've really done any research at all. In any case, i really don't care.As i doubt you are open to anything other than what you choose to believe.I'm done here
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
I was making a point that having similar DNA doesn't prove evolution whatsoever because there are many things in the world that share very similar things but yet they were made seperate. It's not what I chose to believe, it's what evidence, logic, and common sense tells me. If scientists are determined to reject the idea that God created all life then they will never get to the origin of life, because you cannot get intelligent design without a designer.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 If our bodies and the world are the best an all powerful god can come up with, then i am dumbfounded. our DNA isn't just similar, 98% of exactly the same as apes, even down to our very genome. If it's so evident and logical that a supernatural force created everything, then surely there must be several peer reviewed scientific journals on the study of it all, If you have any, i'll be glad to look. And no scientist set out to reject god, they simply study what is out there...
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
Well, who else could create such a huge and awsome universe? Who else could create the human brain or the human eye? Only God could do that. The fact that you don't appreciate his awsome creation isn't my problem. So what if apes share very similar DNA. That's how God made them. But I also rwad somewhere that apes do not infact share 98% of human DNA. I hear all kind of bizarre theories from scientists. I don't trust everything they say.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 So you're assuming that your specific god could be the only possible cause for intelligence? as well as making it seem as if humans and apes are related through DNA (for no apparent reason) and then not mention it in the very book he would expect us to base our lives on? Wtf? The brain, eyes and many more aspects of the human body have been found to be explained by evolution down the biological level. ( even if you don't believe so, it's still an accepted fact)
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@PinkYui16
For over 1,500 years many different people who didn't even know each other all wrote about the same God, but none of them needed to talk about DNA because everything was created. There was zero reason to talk about DNA. What's your point? And the aspects of the human body have only been explained by scientists in their own bizarre theory and speculation, but no concrete evidence, just their own foolish assumptions.
SoldierOfChrist110 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 However due to your previous comment, you've shown yourself to be intellectually lazy, aswell as confirming my idea that you had no interest in learning anything that does not comply with your religion. Now that we have that established, there is no point in talking to you.
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 Cont. and what has been found. Furthermore when were we talking about the origin of life? I thought we were only talking about evolution (The explanation of the abundance of life on the planet) I doubt you even know the basics of the very thing you reject (as shown in your comment) And lastly heres the thing about intelligent design: even if it were proven,you would still have to present evidence as to why that intelligence came from your specific god, and not any other cause
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 So even under the preset of intelligent design, your overall argument still fails.
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 I contend that, deep down, you really aren't being honest with me nor yourself, and are desperately clinging to whatever the like of ray comfort and co. tell you because you want to protect those beliefs of yours from even the smallest bit of scrutiny. It is a cowardly position to be in. Nonetheless; as i said before. In the end. it makes no difference to me what you choose to believe. It only pains me to see someone so willfully ignorant.
PinkYui16 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110 Also, I'm not an atheist. Try to not assume shit, thanks.. I'm actually an agnostic atheist :)
hayleyfoxi 1 year ago
@SoldierOfChrist110
Why do you come to videos and re-start the same arguments you've already lost? The evidence is all there, this isn't even a question in science, only creationists doubt evolution and it's not a scientific doubt.
Your problem is that you think science is a tool which atheists are using to kill God.
Please don't use our medicine, just pray.
BabeReport 1 year ago
Love it. You're about the most amusing Poe I've seen in a while.
kuroshashu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
science, consuming idiotic creationist arguments since 17th century.
NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM !!!
PS. evolution is proven by scientific methods .. with many different methods
Retro Viruses
Gene similarities
Transitional Fossils
Genetic drift
And its being used in genetic engineering and molecular biology ... so calling it false is like saying internet doesnt work.
davelantor 1 year ago
The sad part is, you cannot parody this belief system. I have no idea whether this guy was serious or satirical.
Scanini 1 year ago
Did he just say Evolution was philosophy?
SixtySeventh 1 year ago
Did he just say that Pythagoras theorem is the Hubble constant? Or did I just hear misunderstand him?
malmobarn 1 year ago
LMFAO this shit is hilarious!
Darkside626 1 year ago
Disregard religion for a moment...
Science makes us discover all the law of physics, law of inertia, law of gravity, etc.
The universe & the earth does not came by chance or probability. Scientist now argue coz all evidence points to a product of design. Their factor rate came to that conclusion. If by design, question is why? for what purpose? and by whom?
jandysanchez 1 year ago
@jandysanchez riiight
laxguy22655 1 year ago
@jandysanchez
"Scientist now argue coz all evidence points to a product of design."
Really? Since when? This is just not true!
0xPUNKROCKx0 1 year ago
Adam sandler?!
starlogic99 1 year ago
I really hope ur jokin, if so this was freakin hilarious.
pikachu7567 1 year ago
@ mystic. Mathematics is logical progression of symbols and concepts. The real world is often explained in those numbers and concepts. It isn't a physical science. But it isn't just "numbers".
MISTERASMODEUS 1 year ago
This is hysterical! Can you do this as Deepak Chopra??
MISTERASMODEUS 1 year ago
"Vast minority" Yeah. Poe's law.
newcoyote 1 year ago
Just think also that Darwin did not invent evolution it was thought of before by the greek philosophers. He may have made money fro it and hitler exploited it
pietrrocks 1 year ago
I do not understand sir, this is a very good report from a seemingly well educated gentleman. I will pass his clear logic to the members of my church who need a defense against those who do not support the creationist concept. Just think creation is not a dirty word - but it may be posited as such
pietrrocks 1 year ago
Now you simply can not argue with such a well reasoned, scientific analysis like that! Certainly no illiterate buffoon could have articulated it so masterfully.
OsteologicalsRock 1 year ago
trollz be trollin in this video
justingdbyrne 1 year ago
A "vast minority" of scientists hahaha dude you are hilarious.
zysilveria47 1 year ago
333 likes. half way there!
haha that made no sense.
I like monkeys.
zysilveria47 1 year ago
Evolution is philosophy, not science. "Evolution" is based on a prior commitment to naturalism that won't be shaken by the facts.
Metsada007 1 year ago
This is serious church stuff brother. This guy seems very knowledgeable to me at least. I have shown this to my family and they approve. Please write to us so we can make application to the "Creationist University". I feel that there should be more talks like this on youtube to balance the atheistic evolutionists theory. Remember it is a theory people, a theory!
pietrrocks 1 year ago
Redneck Genius
ChainsThatBind 1 year ago
You Sir are a genius
Dartharus 1 year ago
Do you realize the scientific method every discovery started with follocify
MrAwesomesauce101 1 year ago
You know what else is not science the first humans being made from atoms from the ground :)
MrAwesomesauce101 1 year ago
You know what else is not science people spring from the ground.
MrAwesomesauce101 1 year ago
funny. good job, I think most of us have heard someone like that in our lifetimes
2010cynic 1 year ago
did he say a vast minority?
samuelhadams 1 year ago
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!
BWAHAHAHHAAHHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!
DID THE USE PATHAGORIANS THEORUM TO DESCRIBE THE UNIVERSE LOL!!!!!!
The distance formula and pathagoreans theorum have nothing to do with the universe.
I love this guy xD!
Microtardz 1 year ago
@Microtardz why would you approve of atheistic theorums such as this sir?
pietrrocks 1 year ago
@pietrrocks because those atheistic theorems "sir", are what actually extends our lives today. Not to mention he used it in the video to prove god, so apparently they're not atheistic lolz.
Microtardz 1 year ago
This guy is in the video is just messing right ? Seriously ! I want to know !
Cause this is a whole new level of Stupid.
Ciwan2 1 year ago
Hypotenuse = longest side on a triangle.
How does that show in here?
Killicon93 1 year ago
Thankyou sir for your wonderful wise views. We appreciate it very much and I am happy to subscribe - your views make a lot of sense to myself and my family
pietrrocks 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
funny as hell... a little long, though... about 3 minutes too long
Sexycosy 1 year ago
Comment removed
Sexycosy 1 year ago
Is this the result of the Texas education system?
Evolvedprimate 1 year ago
This can NOT be a citizen of the the most powerful country in the world.
Evolvedprimate 1 year ago
Hahaha so funny it could almost be a real creationist!
blabby102 1 year ago
dude...dont you mean hubble telescope...?....creationist....smh
Terrorxsamx 1 year ago
This is a joke.... Right?
Thedavidcrag 1 year ago 16
@Thedavidcrag
Yes this guy is a satirist.
erzengelauskreig 1 year ago
Evolution defies logic. How can humans turn into monkeys?
XXxAllyssaRulezxXX 1 year ago
...right on..finally an argument for creationism i can get behind...i'm dumping atheism...it all makes sense now...what was i thinking?...
compvm33 1 year ago
If this isn't satire, I am seriously worried about your lack of basic education.
Blue909ninja 1 year ago
favorited.
Sivels 1 year ago
The vast 'minority?' of scientists??? Now what do you suppose he meant by that?
...ah I see! Absolutely nothing, like everything else in this video.
What a dumb hick!
purgruv 1 year ago
Creationists lost the debate over 150 years ago. We've been laughing ever since .
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago 33
@ZachVMNTX1 really? look up "dinosaurs and the origins debate."
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 How's about endogenous retroviruses, the fossil record, carbon ,and radiometric dating, pretty much any honest geneticist or bioligist who knows what they're talking about or just some common sense. Creation is pretty much unanimously rejected in main stream science everywhere. Your a joke, a fraud, a charlatan, I'm not looking up YET ANOTHER article that makes no fucking sense only to YET AGAIN conclude that you people compartmentalize or are just plain stupid.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 in the fossil record, we have found human fossils, human artifacts like hammers, fossilized human footprints(i.e., The Delk Track) and young dinosaur fossils. in 2007, we even found dinosaur TISSUE from a t. rex leg tendon and when they stretched it, the tendons snapped BACK INTO PLACE. that stuff was fresh dude. the newscast in on youtube. radiocarbon dating cn only go back a few thousand years. they don't use it for earth or fossils. and the dinosaur origins thing is a vid series.
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Yes, they don't use carbon dating back to millions of years, and if you'd read his reply to you he said radiometric dating, not carbon dating. The claim about the tendons snapping back into place is just that, a claim, no evidence outside creationist sites claiming it happened and no links to which dig or any of the people involved, let alone a peer-reviewed journal article. p.s human footprints may be preserved but never fossilized. Totally different process.
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
@archapmangcmg radio metric dating doesn't go back in the millions either. and no, the trex tissue is real. it aired on the news on Dec. 16, 2007. THE NEWSCAST IS ON YOUTUBE lookitup. and it was discovered by a team of all evolutionary scientists(who were baffled BTW). and yes, the footprints were fossilized and that disproves evolution. look up the delk track.
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Oops this wasn't in 2007 but 2005, it was the claim popularized by the fraudster Kent Hovind, and debunked in the same year. There was zero soft tissue discovered, there was the remnants of some compounds that are in blood. Footprints can't be fossilized, because fossilization is the replacement of original materials. Footprints are a displacement of material, not made of anything in particular. That the footprint is hardened and preserved is unlikely but not impossible.
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 For the delk track, there's a post on pharyngula which exposes the fake. For your claim about radiometric dating, there's all the Uranium-Lead dating, along with dozens of other cross-checks. Even a 2minute visit to wikipedia will provide a list of methods and references for them. Such a trivial effort required to dispel that fantasy.
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Okay DUDE carbon dating works up to 58- 62, 000 years I know this , hence the reason why I mentioned radiometric dating... and even if you where an expert an tissues rate of decay I'd doubt you where telling the truth about it. So please don't teach creation in our schools and I won't think in your church.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 dude, i'm 13 how am i supposed 2 b a teacher?
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Maybe you should use your time to study facts, not hand-me-down myths and lies from the same kinds of people that lie cheat and steal while claiming to be moral? I guarantee, you'll find a far more amazing universe in reality than in the Bible and every other ancient superstition. We've got more stars than you could ever count one by one in each galaxy, each of them fusion furnaces shouting out "I am here!". We have realms of intense heat and cold, light and darkness.Reality rocks.
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
@archapmangcmg WHY do you think the ible says "the heavens declare his glory"?
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 For much the same reason the Bible also says it's good to sacrifice your daughter for victory in a war of conquest, that beating your slaves within an inch of their lives is fine, that if you rape a woman you have to marry her, etc. They made it up for their own convenience, in a time when slavery, genocide and misogyny were all viewed as normal. That they made up other crap about the glory of the universe means exactly nothing when they didn't know about them.
archapmangcmg 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Well if you really don't know about it then why are you preaching something you don't know? You've just succeeded in looking like an idiot. Please learn the facts and don't contribute to the "Holy Men" poisoning young minds with their psuedo scientific garbage.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 i never said i didn't know about it i'm just saying im too young to have a job. what do you think ive been doing all year that's related to this topic. TRYING TO LEARN THE FACTS.
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Well typically trying to learn with ignorance and arrogance isn't the best approach. You should try to base your world view on the facts given to you, not your facts on your preconceived world view. That's what I did three years ago.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 so you beleive all knowledge is gained through observation?
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Not Direct, enough credible sources are sufficient, however I believe that all our morals and values should be forged, on what we know and live now. And I believe if knowledge passed down fails testing it should be discarded, only to be remembered as the wrong answer.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 but if you beleive in evolution, you cant have morals witout being self-refuting to your worldview. if evry1 forges their own morals, then no1 should b punished.that would justify 9/11,theholocaust,ect. a nobody if were just evolved animals. you wouldn't scold a lion for hunting an antelope! you teach these things in schools and that were just chemical accidents, and you wonder why so many shootings happen in schools. just a chem. accident getin rid of another, wats da problem?
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 THe problem is we all have some mutual interest in living long happy lives. And if you want to live in a society benefiting from the works of others you need to respect them, and find a way to live peacefully. Also it's merely a good idea to stand up together as a group against a threat. However I dream we could all live together peacefully naive I know. BUt the point is sure you can be an animal go out in the wild and do it you want civilized life play by the rules or Gtfo.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 but evolution says you shouldn't care about other's happiness. evolution is not a civilized process.
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 Why should I base all my beliefs in how I got here? I base them on what will make me happy. It's like saying I got here in a car it cannot go up stairs neither should I. And it most certainly doesn't for humans. Evolution is about different traits winning out over each other. I'm trying compassion, and sympathy. You completely misread the value of evolution in my life it's the how not the why or the who. YOu may perceive it that way but you've never had to decide your own morals .
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 so its what makes you happy? hitlers actions made him happy. osama bin ladens actions made him happy. school shootings made the shooters happy. so you don't think something is wrong with that?
Nerdykid1017 1 year ago
@Nerdykid1017 It's what makes everyone happy. And FYI everything you mentioned but the school shootings where based in nationalism, or religion or both. Hitler when you get to him in history class had some pretty fucked up motives. There's tonnes of mentally ill and sick people out there, But most people religious or not do have a sense of right or wrong. And don't forget hitler may have been an atheist but mainly christians did his bidding, and they embraced the same ideals that he did.
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 Evolution or Creation?
Take a disassembled motor car engine and put it in a container. Shake for 1 million years.
If you don't have a running car by then just accept God. (Christian Archives)
MuseFlows 1 year ago
@MuseFlows This is meant to be funny right ? lol
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 Originally I would imply the argument was lost the moment that we understood what a star was and that the earth was not at the center of the universe.
God took 3 days to make one planet called earth and yet only one day to create all the rest of the stars in the sky.......think about that one.
The bible does show it's age as a first century text.
Damdenn 1 year ago
@Damdenn Yeah That's true The first page of genesis pretty much is where the bible falls apart if not the front cover...
ZachVMNTX1 1 year ago
@ZachVMNTX1 I have a few questions for you. I hope you don't mind the amount of them.
do you believe that we (man) are at the end of the evolutionary scale? Yes or no? If yes, do you see the evolutionary process making our world better for us to live in? Yes or no? If no, why not? Is man getting better in the very general sense? Are you encouraged about what the world will look like in lets say 10 years from now in 2020? If yes great, if no, why not?
DeaconCliff 1 year ago