Since duct tape melts at temps well below 200 degrees Farenheit ... can someone explain to me how they used duct tape to fix a fender on a lunar rover?
On the NASA website it says they used "ordinary, gray duct tape".
The temps on the moon range from -250 degrees F in the shade to +250 degrees F in the light.
I try to stick to logic and science when assessing things about the "moon landing". I keep coming up with things that make no sense.
@CNN911Fakes Of course there was!!! Rolls of duct tape were taken on the Apollo missions to repair anything at a moments notice. In fact, duct tape saved the lives of Lovell, Haise and Swigert when it was used in the construction of a co2 scrubber.
@yesiamawizardjonny Nope. Whether you know the Apollo missions were all faked or wish they were not, your comment is wonderful. It just lightened my night.
If you know they were faked, then your comment is appropriately sarcastic and I liked it.
If you wish they were not faked, then to think that they would have taken pounds of the most important repair item that men use is just so absurd that it is still a great comment.
I really did thumb it up and think it deserves thumbs up from all
@yesiamawizardjonny Well, if you ever get proof, I hope you share it widely.
My field of research is 911 and thus, I usually, stay out of the Apollo hoax discussions - can't afford to be spread so thin. Recently I did a 911 video where I incorporated the NASA AA11 (funny hpw those letters show up in hoaxes!) segment with the frogs, so I have had a bit more interest laetly than is healthy for me.
Anyway, loved your comment and am glad I thumbed it up. It was Mastercard priceless.
@yesiamawizardjonny You, like everyone else, are welcome to comment on my videos. YOu may stretch yourself and find errors and expose them to the world.
However, I don't like people commenting on other subjects on my videos and I try to honor others' videos by staying on subject on their videos. This video is about the use of duct tape on the moon, not 911.
I have 260 videos, pick one and make a comment. Heck make a comment on my channel.
focuses on the moon frogs. I am sure you are familiar with that little NASA AA11 beauty.
Again, as with all my videos, you are welcome to visit, rate, comment, spam, troll. Whatever rings your bells.
Your associate, RKO, is not permtted to comment on my videos anymore by your bosses. Sort of sad; in the old days, his spam, trolling, noise and vulgarity were a real turnoff to genuine searchers. Truth can use all the help it can get.
@CNN911Fakes "Well, if you ever get proof, I hope you share it widely." You're looking at proof you fucking moron. If you have proof that the landing was faked, please share it. There is NO evidence, only semi-logical conclusion stated after selectively choosing different facts.
@yesiamawizardjonny ... really now??? dyk that those psi gloves were designed not to grip anything under one inch, meaning they could not close significant enough to tear that tape? one more hoax, exposed!!!
@pt1gard "psi gloves were designed not to grip anything under one inch, meaning they could not close significant enough to tear that tape?" Listen moron, what's the distance between your pointing finger and you middle finger? When you were gloves that thick, you can grib something thin using two fingers. Another dumb conspiracy theorist exposed.
Well, I can't review 695 comments, but has the question been addressed as to how duct tape could endure the temperatures of the moon? On earth, if you leave duct tape out in the hot sun, it will get tacky and start to sag. The temperature of the moon is hotter than boiling water. Maybe it only served to work for the few minutes they needed it?
@bammbamm12 ... you cant use duct tape on moon, the temps go -250 to +250 ... try taping it to your BBQ lid sometime and see if you get adhesion....
also jarrah has talked about the fact you cant hold anything under one inch in those gloves so how can he tear the strip, unless its one inch thick ...
PLUS: note the b.g. Naut once again @ 1:45 heading stage left when he hits the fake backdrop mountain ... this shit is too funny and predictable ... Oh the Net is killing Nasa :)
@pt1gard We can see him using it, so I don't know why you are disputing it.
If NASA was so aware of the temperature variations on the moon, why even show him doing this?
You're not even thinking.
Besides which, the temp of 250+ is reached only by the surface after a full lunar day - weeks of constant sunlight. The mean temperature is -53C, and since there is no surface moisture, the tape will stick fine.
@krisdevalle ... nope, the nauts say it was in sunny side all the time, and as far as nasa showing shit, why do they allow "where are the guys with the hoses?" "and refering to the runners on the backpack cables" or not showing tracks behind/under/in front of the LR in dozens of pics .... nope, nasa never factored the Net to expose their BS ... if they were smart they'd shut down their vids to the public
@pt1gard The engineers know the tape would work. It is only you who think it shouldn't. You are not an engineer.
NASA allowed their entire archive to be scanned, digitized and uploaded for the ALSJ, and you think they didn't 'factor the Net'. Still no logic to your idiocy.
Thank God for duct tape. It was also used by the Apollo 13 Astronauts to build a air cleaner/scrubber to rid the spacecraft from a excess build up of carbon dioxide..
@vaccavo what ? Speed of sound ? There is no sound on the moon, there is a vacuum. Maybe you mean speed of light ? All the radio signals moving with speed of light. Controling a camera is possible from Earth, the delay will be 1,23 seconds (It's 1,23 light seconds from Earth to Moon). The camera is shaking because it fixed on the rover, One of the astranauts repairing the rover, so it shakes.
@divedimon oh, I notice that even in 2011 everytime reporters calling from the same city only reply to the anchor after a little gap. So the communication is faster btwn Moon and Earth?
@vaccavo There are more relay points, and due to the extremely high quality of the sound and image, digital processing takes place. In some ways, high fidelity audio and video does suffer from lag because of routing and processing. Things were a little simpler in the 70's, hence the apparent lack of lag.
These people were very smart; and even if it were faked, they would have remembered to insert lag time if they realised there should be some. You wouldn't forget something like that.
@krisdevalle this is very true. tv signals are relayed via multiple satellites and have to be decoded and processed by computers these days (everything is digital.) The old analogue signals were easy to work with.
@vaccavo you need to educate yourself fool. lol i use to live three houses away from charlie duke for over a decade. he proverbially eats dumb pieces of shit like you for breakfast. he cracked on the hoaxers a lot.
@krisdevalle Maybe be a little more specific and inform us lesser being how long it takes a satellite signal to travel 221,463 miles from the moon to the earth
@Moreofthesamez 1.2 seconds. The speed of light. Radio travels at the speed of light. You can look it up.
Direct radio transmission from the moon is 1.2 seconds. ISS and international communications pass through a lot more relays with more processing due to the increased bandwidth.
Does this explanation seem logical to you? I am trying to explain it as simply as possible.
@yesiamawizardjonny ... you better get your shill time delay lies organized ... other shills have all sorts of diff answers ... mine is, why if the RT is 1/2 million miles and times where it was live, such as NIxon talking to the nauts, does it only take .53 seconds for responses? remember this was live, and light would take over 1.5 secs one way ... a stumped, huh, shill boy? get back to me when you check with Gone to Plaid who blocked me, LMFAO
@pt1gard Sorry. I'm not going to answer you until you gather the courage to debate me on radio. As it turns out, you ran like a scared little bitch when I accepted your challenge. If you want me to answer any questions, we shall do it on radio. That's it...
@mikeoxhuge I think the first thing you have to understand is that NASA was aware of the conditions on the moon, and also that most people at NASA were smarter than you. If they had any doubts about fucking duct tape NOT working on the moon, then they would not have SHOWN IT TO THE FUCKING WORLD so armchair experts like you could apply their obviously well-researched intellect to the video and say OH it will freeze or OH it will burn.
@mikeoxhuge Things do not cool off nearly as quickly with no atmosphere. Heat can not be transfered through collisions without the atmosphere, so it must be through black body radiation (im not sure if I am correct in calling it black body, that might only be for black colored objects, but w/e, close enough aproximation)
heat dissapation through such radiation is much much slower than through an atmosphere.
First of all, you don't know what you could achieve until you try it and still I'm wrong for asking. And I didn't say use air thrusters, I was saying the Ideas in other forms. You guys seem to think the universe can suck you around effortlessly, all you need is a jump, right? How are you going to send a signal through space without interruptions or a reliable middle man? What's your relay? That doesn't sound bogus? There you go believing again and your proof is animation and you brought it?
@GUARDIANtrooper A signal? You mean like radio? It travels at the speed of light. It's how NASA communicates with it's satellites, and other distant probes.
Why do you need a relay? The Voyager probes are nearly on the edge of the solar system and they send signals all the way back to Earth.
In fact Pioneer and Voyager used 'gravity whips' to speed themselves up, this is nearly like being sucked around effortlessly!
Come on dude - try looking some of this stuff up. It's interesting.
@krisdevalle YES, SIGNAL, wtf are you talking about? Earth is full of satellite disruptions, simple things like trees, power lines, fences, houses, etc. When you pass under a bridge, do your satellite radio loses signal? Our universe is far worse for signal disruptions in many ways. Not to mention, there are countless meteoroids, asteroids belts, energy belts, space dust and rocks, super heated and cold spots and unknown fluctuating forces that would rip that thing apart. Common sense, try it...
Just because something appeared to work on camera doesn't mean it worked. You still don't get it, I don't believe in the moon landing... And I told you some possibilities on earth why it wouldn't work compared to common sense in space. In other words, I was asking a question, not speculated, that's your job... The moon is magnetic and it stirs up particles that they complained about right? When the duct tape is pulled, it becomes magnetic and then you have a nonstick surface on your tape, LMAO!
@krisdevalle Every celestial body is magnetic. It's not as strong as earth, but there is no air and you are in a field of energy. It is said by a lot of bold scientist that the moon's surface could not be breached by any sort of contraption from earth. NASA is trying to abort the space program, because they know they can't send humans out pass the belts. Space shuttle Challenger was a false flag to hold down the space program. We have planes that can hover, why not apply this technology?
@GUARDIANtrooper Can you PLEASE show some sources or references to these scientists who say that the surface could not be 'breached'? Because it's commonly accepted that many dozens of unmanned craft, as well as the Apollo craft, did this with no problem.
Planes hover using thrust in air. There is no air in space.
The shuttle fleet just built a 417tonne space station, NASA has the very first probe in orbit around Mercury, and they're about to send a 1 tonne rover to Mars. Not held down.
@krisdevalle Plus, your logic is circular. You say the moon is magnetic, and the dust flies around, so this is why tape would not work, except how did we find out that the moon was magnetic, and how did we find out that the dust flies around, if we didn't go there?
You're saying a lot of stupid stuff, and I'm sorry to have to point this out. Just hold on before you post and check that what you're saying can't get shot down using simple logic.
@krisdevalle Common sense, dust flies around in the universe, on earth and as you drive. A combination of dust and energy and no air between the surfaces. I didn't say it wouldn't stick, I was asking about the experimentation on it. I meant no maned aircraft could breach the moon. The moon is responsible for a lot of disruption on earth, because of its close proximity to earth. Gravity and gamma ray emission is in relations of creating a magnetic field in compliance with levels of radiation.
@GUARDIANtrooper Wow. What a load of crap you just unloaded. I'd be interested if you had a single reference or source to support any of your claims.
I can point to real life examples of long-distance radio working. You seem to be waving your hands around and talking about 'disruption' with sweet fuck all proof of anything.
@krisdevalle I'll do your homework for you if you pay me. You want a video off of youtube? Try using some sense instead of other people's bullshit. Every signal has a limit... Put your boat in a pond, it's fine. Put it in a river and you can kiss that $100 bucks or whatever goodbye. Your cell phone works in your room fine, but sister's room? Tides aren't pretty much it. Earth tilt and balancing, regulating body control, protecting from astroids, reflecting the sun, night light, romance, etc...
@GUARDIANtrooper If every signal has a limit, then explain why we can still send and receive to probes like MESSENGER, around Mercury, or the Voyager and Pioneer probes, virtually on the edge of the solar system?
Come on bro - you say there's no way a manned craft can get to the moon, but no actual scientist or engineer actually says that. No spacefaring nation says that either. Where are you getting your ideas?
@krisdevalle I can explain that pretty easily, MESSENGER IS A FAKE. You and your likes believe it, I don't. Find a more reliable source besides NASA/government bullshit lies. Yes plenty of scientist said it, but most of them fear their careers. What would you do? This is declassified information, research. Not to mention, there are a ass-load of videos on Youtube that clarifies this. If you want it man, you have to get it or you will always love this lie. I can't turn away I've seen enough...
@GUARDIANtrooper Well it appears we have officially turned the corner from ignorant to insane.
Do you have a speck of proof or evidence that MESSENGER is fake? Basically I will accept no claims without evidence. A kooky youtube video is pretty far from evidence.
You have been consistently mistaken about most basic physics. It's been fun, but you're obviously nuts.
@krisdevalle And you are just as nutty to continue to debate with a nut, wouldn't you think? I obviously had your attention, you first blood, but you called me nuts? That hole was open a long time ago, I've never threaten you to stay here. You people want to call me a troll and all kinds of bullshit, I'm not. Something don't seem right about any of this, just like everything else they lied about. Soon you will have no choice but to believe the truth. The truth will always connect, ALWAYS...
@krisdevalle He's not old enough yet or sick enough. Give him some time, he seem very decent, but he got caught up and got in too deep, I can see it in his eyes. He will spill it before he take it to his grave, you'll see...
Wow, they should name the moon hoax, "REDNECKS ON THE MOON SET!!" Did anyone test duct tape in a vacuum? I got it, lets get the Mythbusters to do it, they are sooooo honest, right? Fake ass shit, I don't trust Mythbusters calling out conspiracy theorist as they experiment. To me saying conspiracy theorist shows guilt of a lie covered up. I don't buy none of this bullshit... I don't have respect for liars. You don't like it, good for you, because that is my assessment just like you have yours...
@krisdevalle I was being sarcastic and you are fool to assist... Why are they taping up shit on the moon should be your question instead of ranting about bullshit that you don't even know for a fact is true or not? Is that not a good questions? Ok... Do duct stick when it is wet? Can it stick when it has dirt on it? Do it stick in cooler climates or radiated or gamma-ray juiced climates and all kinds of other bullshit? Go get a new brain and stop taping shit up, any dead person will suffice...
@GUARDIANtrooper You seem to be unaware of the situation that led to the use of the tape in this instance. Despite it actually being in the video description.
This shows me exactly how observant, and literate you are, that you can't even read a fucking simple video description.
@krisdevalle Can you at least pretend you have some fucking sense. I could care less what the fuck they are fixing or why. The point is, would duct tape work on the fucking moon fool...? Since you have all the fucking sense, answer this question... They used a rocket for speed and or to get them pass the Van Allen belts. How in the fuck do they supposed to get back pass the belts 238857 miles away in that small craft with minimum fuel and speed to complete the mission back to earth? Think first.
@GUARDIANtrooper Oddly enough, I answered your question on another thread. What we should also take note of is the relative escape velocities of each body. The Earth's is 11.186 km/s, compared to the Moon, which is 2.38 km/s. That's a big difference. Basically once you are out of the moon's sphere of influence of gravity, Earth takes over. You don't need any fuel after that - you have a free ride.
@krisdevalle You sound like a fool if you think it's a free ride once you get off a rock, you are still in space with unstable and fluctuating forces unknown to man. What about the belts Mr. Freeride...? You think you could just ride a spacedraft back to earth without a scratch just because NASA said so? If the moon can manipulate what is happening on earth, what do you think energy beyond it could do? And you didn't answer the question about the tape, you speculate and not answer questions...
@GUARDIANtrooper What 'forces' are you talking about? The belts are simply trapped radiation - passing through them fast enough results in only a small amount of exposure.
Look - prove duct tape does NOT work in space and you might be getting somewhere.
I get my facts by researching. You could try the same. You haven't said much apart from shown you know little about orbital mechanics, the properties of adhesive, or gravity. Come on man. Get some references, or something.
@GUARDIANtrooper Really - do you think every single person at NASA is so stupid to show them using duct tape on video if it DIDN'T work in space? Because then the first time someone else tests it, they are going to be busted. Have they yet? No.
You think I'm speculating, and you haven't said sweet fuck all about whether you know or not WHY the tape should not work.
Seriously, what is your reasoning? You think you need some kind of special space glue? Explain yourself.
you're stupid man. I need to stop wasting time on this. Just look at this (it's about your video):
science dot nasa dot gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/21apr_ducttape/
dot means . (:D)
They have done even stranger fixes. Like converting round co2 filter into rectangular with duct tape, sock and checklist cover (i probably missed some things)
And about those other videos- they lack common sense. They havent explained my questions (in previous comments)
you're boring to me now XDDD That's the best you could come up with? :DD You're 10 or what ?? :DD
Please just explain with logic how those things were faked (listed in my previous comments) and i promise that i'll believe you. The fact is that the truth is smacked into your face and you just stick to your miserable hoax theory. If you aren't teenager then i am sorry for you. And yes i saw the original footage and there is nothing wrong with it.
@dhudson369 you are truly out of arguments, aren't you? :D The best argument you got is that i am dumb?
Say whatever you want about Lithuania, but it's great country and because its small doesn't mean that amount of money for one person is smaller. And of course the best thing about Lithuania is that there aren't people like these: /watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE :D.
@dhudson369 Why don't you say that shuttle is fake? MSSE engines are much more difficult than Rocketdyne F-1. Those other videos like no stars or moving flag is just so dumb. It's COMMON SENSE. Have you heared something like moon has no atmosphere and camera focus?
@cud0s you cant teach common sense and that you do not have oh the shuttle blasted off but never took the even half way to the moon have you heard of the van allen belt if not look it up and tell me how they got through that alive you love arguing you do last comment now as your so braindead
@cud0s go watch the original footage of the moon landing as neil says one small step etc etc and then walks towards the camera you can see through him and yes it is fake it was filmed on the set of 2001 space oddessy by stanley kubrick. what happened to stanley? he was murdered. dont believe me look up moon landing fact or fake there is the PROOF. oh and your grandfather watched a very large exspensive firework that didnt go bang just went on and on into space.so he was fooled like millions more
@dhudson369 couldnt fit this on went on and on into space after releasing a smallish capsule with the astronauts in as proved by the so called picture of the earth from the moon but its really just a view of earth out of the window in space when they were orbiting the earth BEEN PROVEN. always thought damn the earth is small just look at the size of earth and the size of the moon if you were on the moon the earth would look huge.just look at it in the sky and knowing the size difference of earth
@dhudson369 Don't be stupid. Making hoax with fake Saturn V would be as practical as making your friends think you have a good job by buying Bugatti Veyron and then paying loan for rest of your life. Also don't you think that SSRS would have alarmed world? They had tracking systems and if moon landing was fake they would have seen it.
Why don't you simply say that your hoax theory can't explain things listed in my previous comment
(and of course many other things like LRO pictures, 345 kg moon rocks [and yes rocks with structure like those aren't found in the earth], mirrors on the moon, some
(maybe indian? sorry cant remember)
pictures of lunar lander, etc. ).
:D epic fail. Thank you, because you have just made my day :D
@cud0s no its just you obviously aint even looked up what ive said so whats the point like i said your just dumb or brainwashed like the masses and with peope like you your mind is set on on one thing and cant see the truth even if it smacked you in the face so just no point your boring me now
@cud0s and your comments are on a video that is called fixing lunar rover with duct tape. as in DUCT TAPE! are they for real. being serious DUCT TAPE! WTF lol your a joke
Are YOU for real? What would YOU have them use instead? What particular properties of duct tape do YOU think makes it unfeasible for the job at hand? Do you even THINK before flopping your fingers on the keyboard?
'research pussyhole all mouth and nothing to back your ass up'
My backup is the video itself, as well as many years of using it myself on a daily basis in the radiological aspects of the nuclear field. I notice you haven't bothered to answer a single question I posed. Your 'backup' itself appears to be insults. I could have guessed...
@goodnoah The word you are searching for is probably "Fakir" which is somebody who sleeps on o bed of nails.The Moonlandings were as real as the Universe-not a shadow of a doubt.Sorry that you are too dumb to understand the whole thing.People are different and you are very different to a Moonwalker because he is just better than you in any perspective, but you are unwilling to accept that...but that doesnt change the fact that you are human waste.Full stop.
You're right. Not only is it fake, it's transmitted live from a big basement underneath the Vehicle Assembly Building at the Kennedy Space Center. They have to enact it, every time you click the play button. Poor guys, they don't even get toilet breaks or get to go home for Christmas. That's why NASA spends so much money.
Note: The above statement is about as valid as any other ridiculous hoax statement.
@Slippymicky Technically speaking: if the moon landing is unreal and everything else is unreal, then nothing (not even the landing) is unreal. Double negation of a concept becomes affermation of that concept. Ever studied simple logic (or even simple math) at scool? :)
@Slippymicky: I have witnessed from the stands at Cape Canaveral a Saturn Five launch to the moon, and many Space Shuttle launches. Extremely impressive fakes to say the least. And those non stationary satellites zipping around the sky which you can actually see with the naked eye, those must be just a figment of your imagination too. P.S. As a former Navy Fighter Pilot and Astronaut wannabe, we sometimes used duct tape for a temporary repair on our aircraft. We called it 900 mph tape. LOL
@WavesPiano They just orbited the planet, they didn't land on the moon. So you admit you were never an Astronaut. Claim duck tape can go 900 mph and I'm not suppose to think you're crazy?
pretty amazing for 1960's tech. We could have used NASA's ingenuity to get a usable electric car in the 70's not the 2000's. The modern electric car needs a sizable battery. Where is the 1960's battery on the lunar rover? Seems to have a fair amount of torque, which is something we're just now getting with modern electrics. But you are right, none of that seems strange.
@1234474 It used silver-nickel hydride batteries, which gave good power, but were really, really expensive. But the rover only had a top speed of about 10mph.
I don't know that the batteries on the rover were rechargeable, either. Be worth finding out.
@Slippymicky Did I say that? If you are resorting to making things up now, you're getting rather desperate.
But sure, let's address this. Why is speed an issue, for you? I think it's funny how you didn't know how fast it went until I told you. I begin to see exactly how little you actually know, now.
I wonder if you know how it was packed on the descent module? Actually, forget it; I know you don't.
This is why you have a problem with moon landings. You know very little. Poor you.
@krisdevalle If the entire scientific community believe we landed on the moon then I am smarter. Hey they also believed and promoted global warming. LOL!
@1234474 Those batteries weren't rechargeable, and non-rechargeable batteries were never partucluarly difficult to have. The point is that if every pack of batteries must be disposed of after something like 90 km (rover's endurance), and it is aerospace tech (each rover costed 38 million 1971 dollars = 200 modern dollars), the batteries aren't going to be anywhere near cheap enough to be competitive.
Modern lithium batteries ass-rape the lunar-rover's. And are rechargeable.
@bestinmathagent Roger Wilco I have a smooth bore swan neck I was holding onto while simutaneously eating an old school salami sandwich made without our current level of technology however found the thing to be a pretty heavy duty tasting hunk of smoldering good hardcore salami.
Then I started thinking "everytime I have a weekend project it always involves salad and salad type products"
You people that don't believe they went to the moon are a crack up. Everything is a conspiracy with you folks. I'm sure you probably also think Oswald didn't kill Kennedy either. Unbelievable.
@Slippymicky: You are correct, but to be more specific, Oswald’s bullets killed JFK. I won't waste my time debating the Moon landing with nonbelievers. It happened and eventually you nonbelievers will have to realize that fact. In the meantime, you can waste your own time discussing how well duct tape works in space. You go!
@datzfast -- I have never used a knife to get duct tape off a roll. And it isn't too hard to do with gloves, either. And I use duct tape quite a lot. You must have gotten a bad batch or else you've got butter on your fingers.
@datzfast -- Are you announcing that you are a troll?
Cool.
It's always good to know such things up front.
I, on the other hand, am for the most part posting information that anyone can verify for themselves.
There is no need for simply "believeing" anyone in proving that the hoax-cult promoters have rather foolish arguments in most cases. So if you "believe" that it was a hoax based on their arguments, then you are the one who is simply taking things on faith without thinking.
@datzfast -- It is, in fact, usually easier to get duct tape off of a roll when you can use the hard surface of a glove than it is with just your fingers.
@datzfast There is a little trick called folding the end of the tape over onto itself so that you do not have to struggle with it. Works like a charm.
@Synthetrix to be fair we would have to test your theory with space glove on. I have none at the moment. by the way the 7 rolls of duct tape on my mobile work bench says im a big fan of duct tape i just will not use it outside on the planet earth.
This has been flagged as spam show
Since duct tape melts at temps well below 200 degrees Farenheit ... can someone explain to me how they used duct tape to fix a fender on a lunar rover?
On the NASA website it says they used "ordinary, gray duct tape".
The temps on the moon range from -250 degrees F in the shade to +250 degrees F in the light.
I try to stick to logic and science when assessing things about the "moon landing". I keep coming up with things that make no sense.
roundaboutwrongway 1 month ago
Geez, after reading all these comments: conspiracy theorists are really dumb.
bigbezet 3 months ago
Thank you everytime I see one of this videos I want to be an apollo astronaut.
echozgus 3 months ago
There is no way that a roll of duct tape was sent to the moon.
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Of course there was!!! Rolls of duct tape were taken on the Apollo missions to repair anything at a moments notice. In fact, duct tape saved the lives of Lovell, Haise and Swigert when it was used in the construction of a co2 scrubber.
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago 3
@yesiamawizardjonny YOu are wonderful. I hope this comment gets lots of ups! First one from me!
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Are you being sarcastic?
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny Nope. Whether you know the Apollo missions were all faked or wish they were not, your comment is wonderful. It just lightened my night.
If you know they were faked, then your comment is appropriately sarcastic and I liked it.
If you wish they were not faked, then to think that they would have taken pounds of the most important repair item that men use is just so absurd that it is still a great comment.
I really did thumb it up and think it deserves thumbs up from all
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
@CNN911Fakes I know for a fact that man has walked on the moon.
And I know for a fact that they brought duct tape to fix things.
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny Well, if you ever get proof, I hope you share it widely.
My field of research is 911 and thus, I usually, stay out of the Apollo hoax discussions - can't afford to be spread so thin. Recently I did a 911 video where I incorporated the NASA AA11 (funny hpw those letters show up in hoaxes!) segment with the frogs, so I have had a bit more interest laetly than is healthy for me.
Anyway, loved your comment and am glad I thumbed it up. It was Mastercard priceless.
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Well 911 has been proven as a terrorist attack. Your truther theories are really stupid...
Here's proof:
RKOwens4. Watch his videos. Have fun.
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny You, like everyone else, are welcome to comment on my videos. YOu may stretch yourself and find errors and expose them to the world.
However, I don't like people commenting on other subjects on my videos and I try to honor others' videos by staying on subject on their videos. This video is about the use of duct tape on the moon, not 911.
I have 260 videos, pick one and make a comment. Heck make a comment on my channel.
But, this video is not 911, so, not here.
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny ps, My video
watch?v=LQaCWQNEbso
focuses on the moon frogs. I am sure you are familiar with that little NASA AA11 beauty.
Again, as with all my videos, you are welcome to visit, rate, comment, spam, troll. Whatever rings your bells.
Your associate, RKO, is not permtted to comment on my videos anymore by your bosses. Sort of sad; in the old days, his spam, trolling, noise and vulgarity were a real turnoff to genuine searchers. Truth can use all the help it can get.
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
@CNN911Fakes "Well, if you ever get proof, I hope you share it widely." You're looking at proof you fucking moron. If you have proof that the landing was faked, please share it. There is NO evidence, only semi-logical conclusion stated after selectively choosing different facts.
bigbezet 3 months ago
@bigbezet Your vulgarity speaks louder than your empty phrases. This video proves that what was filmed here did not occur on the moon.
CNN911Fakes 3 months ago
@CNN911Fakes Where is the proof, I ask? Where? What is wrong with this video? Where is you naivety and bigotry coming from?
bigbezet 3 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny ... really now??? dyk that those psi gloves were designed not to grip anything under one inch, meaning they could not close significant enough to tear that tape? one more hoax, exposed!!!
pt1gard 5 months ago in playlist pt1gard's Favorited Videos
This has been flagged as spam show
@pt1gard "psi gloves were designed not to grip anything under one inch, meaning they could not close significant enough to tear that tape?" Listen moron, what's the distance between your pointing finger and you middle finger? When you were gloves that thick, you can grib something thin using two fingers. Another dumb conspiracy theorist exposed.
bigbezet 3 months ago
Well, I can't review 695 comments, but has the question been addressed as to how duct tape could endure the temperatures of the moon? On earth, if you leave duct tape out in the hot sun, it will get tacky and start to sag. The temperature of the moon is hotter than boiling water. Maybe it only served to work for the few minutes they needed it?
bammbamm12 5 months ago
@bammbamm12 ... you cant use duct tape on moon, the temps go -250 to +250 ... try taping it to your BBQ lid sometime and see if you get adhesion....
also jarrah has talked about the fact you cant hold anything under one inch in those gloves so how can he tear the strip, unless its one inch thick ...
PLUS: note the b.g. Naut once again @ 1:45 heading stage left when he hits the fake backdrop mountain ... this shit is too funny and predictable ... Oh the Net is killing Nasa :)
pt1gard 5 months ago
@pt1gard We can see him using it, so I don't know why you are disputing it.
If NASA was so aware of the temperature variations on the moon, why even show him doing this?
You're not even thinking.
Besides which, the temp of 250+ is reached only by the surface after a full lunar day - weeks of constant sunlight. The mean temperature is -53C, and since there is no surface moisture, the tape will stick fine.
There's utterly no logic to your claims.
krisdevalle 5 months ago
@krisdevalle ... nope, the nauts say it was in sunny side all the time, and as far as nasa showing shit, why do they allow "where are the guys with the hoses?" "and refering to the runners on the backpack cables" or not showing tracks behind/under/in front of the LR in dozens of pics .... nope, nasa never factored the Net to expose their BS ... if they were smart they'd shut down their vids to the public
pt1gard 5 months ago
@pt1gard The engineers know the tape would work. It is only you who think it shouldn't. You are not an engineer.
NASA allowed their entire archive to be scanned, digitized and uploaded for the ALSJ, and you think they didn't 'factor the Net'. Still no logic to your idiocy.
krisdevalle 5 months ago
Thank God for duct tape. It was also used by the Apollo 13 Astronauts to build a air cleaner/scrubber to rid the spacecraft from a excess build up of carbon dioxide..
spacemouse1 6 months ago
The moon landing was filmed on a sound-stage ON MARS!
in case you didn't get it, that was sarcasm.
um, someone said the moon is magnetic? um, why?(also, please remind me why the earth's core is magnetic)
also, um, why would the moon being magnetic cause dust storms? are you implying that the dust would also be magnetic//conductive/superconductive?
(if it was superconductive, that would be really cool, and would explain the not observed floating dust)
yspy1 7 months ago
This is the human way to solve our problems biatches! XD
TheNightracer 7 months ago
0.55 WTF?? RPG???
pesoen 7 months ago 3
3rd person is the camera man. and I LOVE the simultaneous conversation. The HUGE speed of sound!!!!!!!!!!!
vaccavo 8 months ago
@vaccavo what ? Speed of sound ? There is no sound on the moon, there is a vacuum. Maybe you mean speed of light ? All the radio signals moving with speed of light. Controling a camera is possible from Earth, the delay will be 1,23 seconds (It's 1,23 light seconds from Earth to Moon). The camera is shaking because it fixed on the rover, One of the astranauts repairing the rover, so it shakes.
divedimon 8 months ago
@divedimon oh, I notice that even in 2011 everytime reporters calling from the same city only reply to the anchor after a little gap. So the communication is faster btwn Moon and Earth?
vaccavo 8 months ago
@vaccavo There are more relay points, and due to the extremely high quality of the sound and image, digital processing takes place. In some ways, high fidelity audio and video does suffer from lag because of routing and processing. Things were a little simpler in the 70's, hence the apparent lack of lag.
These people were very smart; and even if it were faked, they would have remembered to insert lag time if they realised there should be some. You wouldn't forget something like that.
krisdevalle 8 months ago
@krisdevalle this is very true. tv signals are relayed via multiple satellites and have to be decoded and processed by computers these days (everything is digital.) The old analogue signals were easy to work with.
@vaccavo you need to educate yourself fool. lol i use to live three houses away from charlie duke for over a decade. he proverbially eats dumb pieces of shit like you for breakfast. he cracked on the hoaxers a lot.
KymeraGR7 7 months ago
@krisdevalle Maybe be a little more specific and inform us lesser being how long it takes a satellite signal to travel 221,463 miles from the moon to the earth
Moreofthesamez 7 months ago
@Moreofthesamez 1.2 seconds. The speed of light. Radio travels at the speed of light. You can look it up.
Direct radio transmission from the moon is 1.2 seconds. ISS and international communications pass through a lot more relays with more processing due to the increased bandwidth.
Does this explanation seem logical to you? I am trying to explain it as simply as possible.
krisdevalle 7 months ago
@vaccavo Sometimes the delay is edited out to improve the footage, but it's only a few seconds delay from the Earth to the moon.
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny ... you better get your shill time delay lies organized ... other shills have all sorts of diff answers ... mine is, why if the RT is 1/2 million miles and times where it was live, such as NIxon talking to the nauts, does it only take .53 seconds for responses? remember this was live, and light would take over 1.5 secs one way ... a stumped, huh, shill boy? get back to me when you check with Gone to Plaid who blocked me, LMFAO
pt1gard 5 months ago in playlist pt1gard's Favorited Videos
@pt1gard Sorry. I'm not going to answer you until you gather the courage to debate me on radio. As it turns out, you ran like a scared little bitch when I accepted your challenge. If you want me to answer any questions, we shall do it on radio. That's it...
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
how cold is it on the moon?
duct tape will freeze .
ever work with frozen tape?
mikeoxhuge 9 months ago
@mikeoxhuge They are in full sun. It's not freezing. Anything in sunlight will be warmed by the solar radiation.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle Soooo then the tape was 200+ degrees
mikeoxhuge 8 months ago
@mikeoxhuge I think the first thing you have to understand is that NASA was aware of the conditions on the moon, and also that most people at NASA were smarter than you. If they had any doubts about fucking duct tape NOT working on the moon, then they would not have SHOWN IT TO THE FUCKING WORLD so armchair experts like you could apply their obviously well-researched intellect to the video and say OH it will freeze or OH it will burn.
What do you think, champ?
krisdevalle 8 months ago 2
@krisdevalle .. try taping a strip of duct tape to your BBQ lid or a dish of ice cubes--you are as ignorant a bully as they come. Nasa shill cubed
pt1gard 5 months ago
@pt1gard ... i notice you didnt want to touch the one inch max gloves tearing the duct tape?? lmfao
pt1gard 5 months ago
@krisdevalle Kris, I love the way you handle yourself. You have just about as much patience for hoaxers as I do... Stupidity annoys me...
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny Sometimes some patient explanation works. Other times you just need to drop the hammer.
Some people have legitimate questions, others just aren't even thinking.
krisdevalle 5 months ago
@mikeoxhuge Things do not cool off nearly as quickly with no atmosphere. Heat can not be transfered through collisions without the atmosphere, so it must be through black body radiation (im not sure if I am correct in calling it black body, that might only be for black colored objects, but w/e, close enough aproximation)
heat dissapation through such radiation is much much slower than through an atmosphere.
yspy1 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrTomhollis 9 months ago
First of all, you don't know what you could achieve until you try it and still I'm wrong for asking. And I didn't say use air thrusters, I was saying the Ideas in other forms. You guys seem to think the universe can suck you around effortlessly, all you need is a jump, right? How are you going to send a signal through space without interruptions or a reliable middle man? What's your relay? That doesn't sound bogus? There you go believing again and your proof is animation and you brought it?
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper A signal? You mean like radio? It travels at the speed of light. It's how NASA communicates with it's satellites, and other distant probes.
Why do you need a relay? The Voyager probes are nearly on the edge of the solar system and they send signals all the way back to Earth.
In fact Pioneer and Voyager used 'gravity whips' to speed themselves up, this is nearly like being sucked around effortlessly!
Come on dude - try looking some of this stuff up. It's interesting.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle YES, SIGNAL, wtf are you talking about? Earth is full of satellite disruptions, simple things like trees, power lines, fences, houses, etc. When you pass under a bridge, do your satellite radio loses signal? Our universe is far worse for signal disruptions in many ways. Not to mention, there are countless meteoroids, asteroids belts, energy belts, space dust and rocks, super heated and cold spots and unknown fluctuating forces that would rip that thing apart. Common sense, try it...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
Just because something appeared to work on camera doesn't mean it worked. You still don't get it, I don't believe in the moon landing... And I told you some possibilities on earth why it wouldn't work compared to common sense in space. In other words, I was asking a question, not speculated, that's your job... The moon is magnetic and it stirs up particles that they complained about right? When the duct tape is pulled, it becomes magnetic and then you have a nonstick surface on your tape, LMAO!
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper No, the moon is not magnetic. Where did you get this idea?
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle Every celestial body is magnetic. It's not as strong as earth, but there is no air and you are in a field of energy. It is said by a lot of bold scientist that the moon's surface could not be breached by any sort of contraption from earth. NASA is trying to abort the space program, because they know they can't send humans out pass the belts. Space shuttle Challenger was a false flag to hold down the space program. We have planes that can hover, why not apply this technology?
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Can you PLEASE show some sources or references to these scientists who say that the surface could not be 'breached'? Because it's commonly accepted that many dozens of unmanned craft, as well as the Apollo craft, did this with no problem.
Planes hover using thrust in air. There is no air in space.
The shuttle fleet just built a 417tonne space station, NASA has the very first probe in orbit around Mercury, and they're about to send a 1 tonne rover to Mars. Not held down.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle Plus, your logic is circular. You say the moon is magnetic, and the dust flies around, so this is why tape would not work, except how did we find out that the moon was magnetic, and how did we find out that the dust flies around, if we didn't go there?
You're saying a lot of stupid stuff, and I'm sorry to have to point this out. Just hold on before you post and check that what you're saying can't get shot down using simple logic.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle Common sense, dust flies around in the universe, on earth and as you drive. A combination of dust and energy and no air between the surfaces. I didn't say it wouldn't stick, I was asking about the experimentation on it. I meant no maned aircraft could breach the moon. The moon is responsible for a lot of disruption on earth, because of its close proximity to earth. Gravity and gamma ray emission is in relations of creating a magnetic field in compliance with levels of radiation.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Wow. What a load of crap you just unloaded. I'd be interested if you had a single reference or source to support any of your claims.
I can point to real life examples of long-distance radio working. You seem to be waving your hands around and talking about 'disruption' with sweet fuck all proof of anything.
The moon causes tides. That's pretty much it.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle I'll do your homework for you if you pay me. You want a video off of youtube? Try using some sense instead of other people's bullshit. Every signal has a limit... Put your boat in a pond, it's fine. Put it in a river and you can kiss that $100 bucks or whatever goodbye. Your cell phone works in your room fine, but sister's room? Tides aren't pretty much it. Earth tilt and balancing, regulating body control, protecting from astroids, reflecting the sun, night light, romance, etc...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper If every signal has a limit, then explain why we can still send and receive to probes like MESSENGER, around Mercury, or the Voyager and Pioneer probes, virtually on the edge of the solar system?
Come on bro - you say there's no way a manned craft can get to the moon, but no actual scientist or engineer actually says that. No spacefaring nation says that either. Where are you getting your ideas?
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle I can explain that pretty easily, MESSENGER IS A FAKE. You and your likes believe it, I don't. Find a more reliable source besides NASA/government bullshit lies. Yes plenty of scientist said it, but most of them fear their careers. What would you do? This is declassified information, research. Not to mention, there are a ass-load of videos on Youtube that clarifies this. If you want it man, you have to get it or you will always love this lie. I can't turn away I've seen enough...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Well it appears we have officially turned the corner from ignorant to insane.
Do you have a speck of proof or evidence that MESSENGER is fake? Basically I will accept no claims without evidence. A kooky youtube video is pretty far from evidence.
You have been consistently mistaken about most basic physics. It's been fun, but you're obviously nuts.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle And you are just as nutty to continue to debate with a nut, wouldn't you think? I obviously had your attention, you first blood, but you called me nuts? That hole was open a long time ago, I've never threaten you to stay here. You people want to call me a troll and all kinds of bullshit, I'm not. Something don't seem right about any of this, just like everything else they lied about. Soon you will have no choice but to believe the truth. The truth will always connect, ALWAYS...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Well, it's been 41 years. I wouldn't hold my breath.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle He's not old enough yet or sick enough. Give him some time, he seem very decent, but he got caught up and got in too deep, I can see it in his eyes. He will spill it before he take it to his grave, you'll see...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
beep....beep...beep...beep..bah..bah...bah...bah...sheep
LOL I like this one...we landed on the moon, yeah right.
Good job my friend!
glower125 9 months ago
Wow, they should name the moon hoax, "REDNECKS ON THE MOON SET!!" Did anyone test duct tape in a vacuum? I got it, lets get the Mythbusters to do it, they are sooooo honest, right? Fake ass shit, I don't trust Mythbusters calling out conspiracy theorist as they experiment. To me saying conspiracy theorist shows guilt of a lie covered up. I don't buy none of this bullshit... I don't have respect for liars. You don't like it, good for you, because that is my assessment just like you have yours...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper What makes you think duct tape doesn't work in a vacuum?
Maybe you want to be perfectly sure you're right before making a fool of yourself in public...?
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle I was being sarcastic and you are fool to assist... Why are they taping up shit on the moon should be your question instead of ranting about bullshit that you don't even know for a fact is true or not? Is that not a good questions? Ok... Do duct stick when it is wet? Can it stick when it has dirt on it? Do it stick in cooler climates or radiated or gamma-ray juiced climates and all kinds of other bullshit? Go get a new brain and stop taping shit up, any dead person will suffice...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper You seem to be unaware of the situation that led to the use of the tape in this instance. Despite it actually being in the video description.
This shows me exactly how observant, and literate you are, that you can't even read a fucking simple video description.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle Can you at least pretend you have some fucking sense. I could care less what the fuck they are fixing or why. The point is, would duct tape work on the fucking moon fool...? Since you have all the fucking sense, answer this question... They used a rocket for speed and or to get them pass the Van Allen belts. How in the fuck do they supposed to get back pass the belts 238857 miles away in that small craft with minimum fuel and speed to complete the mission back to earth? Think first.
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Oddly enough, I answered your question on another thread. What we should also take note of is the relative escape velocities of each body. The Earth's is 11.186 km/s, compared to the Moon, which is 2.38 km/s. That's a big difference. Basically once you are out of the moon's sphere of influence of gravity, Earth takes over. You don't need any fuel after that - you have a free ride.
Any more questions, I'm happy to answer them.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@krisdevalle You sound like a fool if you think it's a free ride once you get off a rock, you are still in space with unstable and fluctuating forces unknown to man. What about the belts Mr. Freeride...? You think you could just ride a spacedraft back to earth without a scratch just because NASA said so? If the moon can manipulate what is happening on earth, what do you think energy beyond it could do? And you didn't answer the question about the tape, you speculate and not answer questions...
GUARDIANtrooper 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper What 'forces' are you talking about? The belts are simply trapped radiation - passing through them fast enough results in only a small amount of exposure.
Look - prove duct tape does NOT work in space and you might be getting somewhere.
I get my facts by researching. You could try the same. You haven't said much apart from shown you know little about orbital mechanics, the properties of adhesive, or gravity. Come on man. Get some references, or something.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Really - do you think every single person at NASA is so stupid to show them using duct tape on video if it DIDN'T work in space? Because then the first time someone else tests it, they are going to be busted. Have they yet? No.
You think I'm speculating, and you haven't said sweet fuck all about whether you know or not WHY the tape should not work.
Seriously, what is your reasoning? You think you need some kind of special space glue? Explain yourself.
krisdevalle 9 months ago
red green would be proud
catklyst 10 months ago
@catklyst lol i love that show
countrygirl439 9 months ago
Im telling you it fixes everything god they just dont listin
MW2HACKERMATH 10 months ago
OK its my final comment, because i got needed information.
Moon hoax:
psychologytoday dodt com \blog\the-narcissus-in-all-us\200809\paranoia-911-and-the-roots-conspiracy-theoriesi
recommend reading the book "Empire of Conspiracies". (I know you won't read it :D)
I don't care what people think and believe in, but i hate people who follows their feelings, emotions, not rational etc.
You just showed me that most people are just a pile meat which you can manipulate for your own needs.
cud0s 11 months ago
you're stupid man. I need to stop wasting time on this. Just look at this (it's about your video):
science dot nasa dot gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/21apr_ducttape/
dot means . (:D)
They have done even stranger fixes. Like converting round co2 filter into rectangular with duct tape, sock and checklist cover (i probably missed some things)
And about those other videos- they lack common sense. They havent explained my questions (in previous comments)
cud0s 11 months ago
you're boring to me now XDDD That's the best you could come up with? :DD You're 10 or what ?? :DD
Please just explain with logic how those things were faked (listed in my previous comments) and i promise that i'll believe you. The fact is that the truth is smacked into your face and you just stick to your miserable hoax theory. If you aren't teenager then i am sorry for you. And yes i saw the original footage and there is nothing wrong with it.
cud0s 11 months ago
@cud0sYAWN! pipe down how is life in Lithuania shocking you got the internet in such a poor country
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369 you are truly out of arguments, aren't you? :D The best argument you got is that i am dumb?
Say whatever you want about Lithuania, but it's great country and because its small doesn't mean that amount of money for one person is smaller. And of course the best thing about Lithuania is that there aren't people like these: /watch?v=fJuNgBkloFE :D.
cud0s 11 months ago
@cud0s if you looked up moon landing fact or fake you wouldnt need me to answer as ALL THE PROOF IS THERE
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369 Why don't you say that shuttle is fake? MSSE engines are much more difficult than Rocketdyne F-1. Those other videos like no stars or moving flag is just so dumb. It's COMMON SENSE. Have you heared something like moon has no atmosphere and camera focus?
And what about your education?
cud0s 11 months ago
@cud0s you cant teach common sense and that you do not have oh the shuttle blasted off but never took the even half way to the moon have you heard of the van allen belt if not look it up and tell me how they got through that alive you love arguing you do last comment now as your so braindead
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369 now its really final comment :D. Don't ask me just google it. Don't you know how to use it? Read this:
xmission ddott com/~jwindley/envrad.html
cud0s 11 months ago
Comment removed
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369
1.The rover was folded and attached to hull of the LEM and not carried inside.
2. They didn't bolt it together. They unfolded it and of course the mechanics were prepared for the gloves.
3. Can you turn your caps lock off you fu**ing moron, please?
P.S. My grandfather watched saturn v launch. How could this be faked? Holograms ?? :DD
cud0s 11 months ago
@cud0s go watch the original footage of the moon landing as neil says one small step etc etc and then walks towards the camera you can see through him and yes it is fake it was filmed on the set of 2001 space oddessy by stanley kubrick. what happened to stanley? he was murdered. dont believe me look up moon landing fact or fake there is the PROOF. oh and your grandfather watched a very large exspensive firework that didnt go bang just went on and on into space.so he was fooled like millions more
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369 couldnt fit this on went on and on into space after releasing a smallish capsule with the astronauts in as proved by the so called picture of the earth from the moon but its really just a view of earth out of the window in space when they were orbiting the earth BEEN PROVEN. always thought damn the earth is small just look at the size of earth and the size of the moon if you were on the moon the earth would look huge.just look at it in the sky and knowing the size difference of earth
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369 Don't be stupid. Making hoax with fake Saturn V would be as practical as making your friends think you have a good job by buying Bugatti Veyron and then paying loan for rest of your life. Also don't you think that SSRS would have alarmed world? They had tracking systems and if moon landing was fake they would have seen it.
cud0s 11 months ago
@cud0s your as dumb as the masses
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369 Ran out of arguments?
Why don't you simply say that your hoax theory can't explain things listed in my previous comment
(and of course many other things like LRO pictures, 345 kg moon rocks [and yes rocks with structure like those aren't found in the earth], mirrors on the moon, some
(maybe indian? sorry cant remember)
pictures of lunar lander, etc. ).
:D epic fail. Thank you, because you have just made my day :D
P.S. go learn something you moron :D
cud0s 11 months ago
@cud0s no its just you obviously aint even looked up what ive said so whats the point like i said your just dumb or brainwashed like the masses and with peope like you your mind is set on on one thing and cant see the truth even if it smacked you in the face so just no point your boring me now
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369 And if it doesn't offend you could you tell your true age and education level? If it bothers you, don't tell. It's just out of curiosity.
cud0s 11 months ago
@cud0s RESEARCH DUMB SHIT START WITH MY VIDEO ABOVE
dhudson369 11 months ago
@cud0s and your comments are on a video that is called fixing lunar rover with duct tape. as in DUCT TAPE! are they for real. being serious DUCT TAPE! WTF lol your a joke
dhudson369 11 months ago
@dhudson369
'are they for real. being serious DUCT TAPE!'
Are YOU for real? What would YOU have them use instead? What particular properties of duct tape do YOU think makes it unfeasible for the job at hand? Do you even THINK before flopping your fingers on the keyboard?
Monkeyboysdontknow 10 months ago
@Monkeyboysdontknow research pussyhole all mouth and nothing to back your ass up
dhudson369 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dhudson369
'research pussyhole all mouth and nothing to back your ass up'
My backup is the video itself, as well as many years of using it myself on a daily basis in the radiological aspects of the nuclear field. I notice you haven't bothered to answer a single question I posed. Your 'backup' itself appears to be insults. I could have guessed...
Monkeyboysdontknow 10 months ago
if you think the moon landing is fake, what proof do you have that is it fake? huh show me a picture or something other then that Shut up.
timothybowen5 1 year ago
FAKE
goodnoah 1 year ago
@goodnoah The word you are searching for is probably "Fakir" which is somebody who sleeps on o bed of nails.The Moonlandings were as real as the Universe-not a shadow of a doubt.Sorry that you are too dumb to understand the whole thing.People are different and you are very different to a Moonwalker because he is just better than you in any perspective, but you are unwilling to accept that...but that doesnt change the fact that you are human waste.Full stop.
stevehislop 1 year ago
@goodnoah
You're right. Not only is it fake, it's transmitted live from a big basement underneath the Vehicle Assembly Building at the Kennedy Space Center. They have to enact it, every time you click the play button. Poor guys, they don't even get toilet breaks or get to go home for Christmas. That's why NASA spends so much money.
Note: The above statement is about as valid as any other ridiculous hoax statement.
henrikmk 1 year ago
Trolls arent real either.
Slippymicky 1 year ago 2
@Slippymicky So you are not real. I am not real. Nothing is really real.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
Comment removed
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail Reality is real.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky But I'm not. Stop arguing with unreal things.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail You believe in the moon landing and you accuse me of argueing with unreal things? LOL!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky I accuse you of unreality sir. I am unreal, so you must be too.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail Well isn't that special. LOL!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky yeah, lots of long penises in the porn industry.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail Yeah you're typical of the moon landing types.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky I'm not for nor against moon landings.
I'm an interent troll and I oppose whatever you happen to believe in, just to have personal immature fun in mocking you silly.
You wanna claim pink elephants don't exist? I will claim till death that I have PROOF of their existence and spam the hell outta you.
You wanna claim Obama is a Nigga? I will explain why you are wrong until your eventual exaustion and ragequit.
You wanna play with me? :)
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail Ahhhhh! Well that explains a few things. Or maybe not! Nyuk nyuk nyuk!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail Sure! =D
I claim that you think this statement is incorrect.
Mwahahaahah!
L00NGB00W 11 months ago
@bobafetthotmail dude your such an ignorant fuck
Quickkiller0 11 months ago
@Quickkiller0 Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. I'm gonna cry now.
Btw, please state what your side is. Moon hoaxers or NASA supporters?
bobafetthotmail 11 months ago
@bobafetthotmail NASA supporter dude!!
Quickkiller0 11 months ago
@Slippymicky Well at least you got that one right! Bravo! I was starting to get worried.
Slippymicky 5 months ago
@bobafetthotmail So you admit the moon landings are not real! AH HA!
Slippymicky 5 months ago
@Slippymicky Technically speaking: if the moon landing is unreal and everything else is unreal, then nothing (not even the landing) is unreal. Double negation of a concept becomes affermation of that concept. Ever studied simple logic (or even simple math) at scool? :)
bobafetthotmail 4 months ago
@bobafetthotmail Just as long as you admit it's not real.
Slippymicky 4 months ago
@Slippymicky: I have witnessed from the stands at Cape Canaveral a Saturn Five launch to the moon, and many Space Shuttle launches. Extremely impressive fakes to say the least. And those non stationary satellites zipping around the sky which you can actually see with the naked eye, those must be just a figment of your imagination too. P.S. As a former Navy Fighter Pilot and Astronaut wannabe, we sometimes used duct tape for a temporary repair on our aircraft. We called it 900 mph tape. LOL
WavesPiano 1 year ago
@WavesPiano They just orbited the planet, they didn't land on the moon. So you admit you were never an Astronaut. Claim duck tape can go 900 mph and I'm not suppose to think you're crazy?
Slippymicky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
pretty amazing for 1960's tech. We could have used NASA's ingenuity to get a usable electric car in the 70's not the 2000's. The modern electric car needs a sizable battery. Where is the 1960's battery on the lunar rover? Seems to have a fair amount of torque, which is something we're just now getting with modern electrics. But you are right, none of that seems strange.
1234474 1 year ago
@1234474 It used silver-nickel hydride batteries, which gave good power, but were really, really expensive. But the rover only had a top speed of about 10mph.
I don't know that the batteries on the rover were rechargeable, either. Be worth finding out.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle Yeah right. The U.S. government would spend billions on a vehicle that can only go 10 mph. LOL!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky Your trolling is getting poorer and poorer.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle The only person trolling is from the land downunder. Someone has to stand up for the truth no matter how unpopular it is.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@krisdevalle I mean seeing as how you think a vehicle going 10 mph is somehow a scientific breakthrough. LOL!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky Did I say that? If you are resorting to making things up now, you're getting rather desperate.
But sure, let's address this. Why is speed an issue, for you? I think it's funny how you didn't know how fast it went until I told you. I begin to see exactly how little you actually know, now.
I wonder if you know how it was packed on the descent module? Actually, forget it; I know you don't.
This is why you have a problem with moon landings. You know very little. Poor you.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle I know we didn't land on it. LOL! So who really know little! LOL!!!!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky I see where you think are smarter than the entire scientific community, and I laugh too.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle If the entire scientific community believe we landed on the moon then I am smarter. Hey they also believed and promoted global warming. LOL!
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky You may be smart, but my penis is longer. Way longer.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail Crude mindless oaf.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky "Crude mindless oaf" butthurt.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@krisdevalle You're allowed to bask in the glow of my greatness.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky 10 mph IN SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE!!!
The last part is a scientific breaktrough.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail No it's not. space junk flies faster than that.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky Space junk doesn't carry people safely.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@bobafetthotmail You grow in wisdom.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Slippymicky "You grow in wisdom." And with that my penis.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
@1234474 Those batteries weren't rechargeable, and non-rechargeable batteries were never partucluarly difficult to have. The point is that if every pack of batteries must be disposed of after something like 90 km (rover's endurance), and it is aerospace tech (each rover costed 38 million 1971 dollars = 200 modern dollars), the batteries aren't going to be anywhere near cheap enough to be competitive.
Modern lithium batteries ass-rape the lunar-rover's. And are rechargeable.
bobafetthotmail 1 year ago
they learned duct tape was mighty handy to have in the appollo 13 mission, so they allways had soem along
xtiml 1 year ago
Apollo 17 people are CRAZY
They took drugs before going to the moon lol
:they fall on the moon
:they run on the moon
:next mission they will play basketball on the moon
bestinmathagent 1 year ago
@bestinmathagent Roger Wilco I have a smooth bore swan neck I was holding onto while simutaneously eating an old school salami sandwich made without our current level of technology however found the thing to be a pretty heavy duty tasting hunk of smoldering good hardcore salami.
Then I started thinking "everytime I have a weekend project it always involves salad and salad type products"
I'm not really crazy but I do play a doctor on tv
MightySaturn5 1 year ago
i hear frogs singing
crosbilius 1 year ago
You people that don't believe they went to the moon are a crack up. Everything is a conspiracy with you folks. I'm sure you probably also think Oswald didn't kill Kennedy either. Unbelievable.
WavesPiano 1 year ago
@WavesPiano Oswald didn't kill Kennedy. The bullets did.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky: You are correct, but to be more specific, Oswald’s bullets killed JFK. I won't waste my time debating the Moon landing with nonbelievers. It happened and eventually you nonbelievers will have to realize that fact. In the meantime, you can waste your own time discussing how well duct tape works in space. You go!
WavesPiano 1 year ago
Everything in it is fake. Also if the scientists want to keep their racket going they are going to promote this falsehood.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
slovensky astronaut :)
Janshevik 1 year ago
bit of celotape should sort that pesky fender out
guitarnashelter 1 year ago
that could be a grilled cheese sandwich, really truthfully i cant tell
datzfast 1 year ago
i cant get a piece of duct tape off the roll with out a knife and he does it with lunar gloves, all i can say is dont let himenear your wallet.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast That's further proof that it's fake.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@datzfast -- I have never used a knife to get duct tape off a roll. And it isn't too hard to do with gloves, either. And I use duct tape quite a lot. You must have gotten a bad batch or else you've got butter on your fingers.
Yes, duct tape will work on the moon.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@nesokretep troll
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast -- Are you announcing that you are a troll?
Cool.
It's always good to know such things up front.
I, on the other hand, am for the most part posting information that anyone can verify for themselves.
There is no need for simply "believeing" anyone in proving that the hoax-cult promoters have rather foolish arguments in most cases. So if you "believe" that it was a hoax based on their arguments, then you are the one who is simply taking things on faith without thinking.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@datzfast -- It is, in fact, usually easier to get duct tape off of a roll when you can use the hard surface of a glove than it is with just your fingers.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@datzfast There is a little trick called folding the end of the tape over onto itself so that you do not have to struggle with it. Works like a charm.
Synthetrix 1 year ago
@Synthetrix to be fair we would have to test your theory with space glove on. I have none at the moment. by the way the 7 rolls of duct tape on my mobile work bench says im a big fan of duct tape i just will not use it outside on the planet earth.
datzfast 1 year ago
@datzfast What is the problem here; we can see him doing it IN THE VIDEO.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle We can see them landing on the moon in a video but it didn't happen.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky Many tens of thousands of scientists, all very experienced in detecting bullshit, seem to disagree with you.
What strong evidence do you have that shows this was fake?
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle The scientists need to keep the hoax going or be out of jobs.
Slippymicky 1 year ago
@Slippymicky That's not evidence, champ, that's some half-baked theory.
krisdevalle 1 year ago
@krisdevalle No it's a fact.
Slippymicky 1 year ago