in 1987 I looked out my office window near Dulles airport and saw this fly right past my window... 747 with a shuttle on back.... theres something you dont see everyday
And while it is the mating season an land, its far from different in the skies. As demonstrated in this clip of a couple getting ready to mate in the air. when it comes back down it will be pregnant with f-16 fighter jest soon to grow into and airbus A380
is this just for transportation? LIke the spacecraft has returned from space, and this is just a way to take it back to nasa? I know these ae dumb questions. I just want to know whats going on here.
@caveman357 - Years ago if I remember correctly, the space shuttle would land out in the west at an Air Force Base. I think it was too risky to others to land in Florida. But with new navigation technology they can now land in Florida. Though they would land elsewhere if the weather was bad in Florida. They used the 747 to fly it back since the space shuttle can't fly on its own. I remember as a kid watching it land at Kellies Air Force Base to refuel before going to Florida.
@AtlRacerBoyz The only reason the shuttle landed at Edwards AF base in California was because of bad weather in Florida or mods that were done to the orbiters. They tested the mods at Edwards. Navigation was the same at both locations. GPS was added to the orbiters years ago and used in both locations...
I can just imagine the discussion at NASA: they're trying to design a special plane to take the shuttle up to the stratosphere and someone says, "Why not just put it on the back of a 747?"
@AdiViv95 Its a 747 and amazingly enough, the shuttle doesnt smash through it. Not one time in its 30 years of service did those planes ever have a problem lifting the shuttle
well... have you seen the superman movie? what if a malfunction happens like in the movie, there wont be any superman near by to rescue everyone.... its no go. very very dangerous, considering the 747 is carrying people... would be better if special 474 were built only for this purpose....
well... have you seen the superman movie? what if a malfunction like happens like in the movie, there wont be any superman near by to rescue everyone.... its no go. very very dangerous, considering the 747 is carrying people... would be better if special 474 were built only for this purpose....
I've always wondered this.. I'm guessing the shuttle has no fuel but what is the empty weight? does the 747 need special support for the shuttle on top?
@SubaruB4RSK The 747 is gutted on the inside with fuselage reinforcements. The residual fuels are removed for the most part but that doesnt add much weight. Depending what orbiter your talking about, the weight is 185,000 to 200,000 pounds. Also the payload bay usually has some kind of returning payload in it. Todays 747's can carry twice that weight. So the orbiters weight is not a problem.
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during 5.5 years by the German BND,the former GESTAPO. I recorded more than 100 videotapes which ended up in the legal system. My brother was tortured during 1.5 years despite several legal procedures pending. He was assassinated on July 11th 2009 because of our homepage, linked on my channel, and our book Der Totalitäre Staat. If my homepage disappears,the BND will have assassinated me as well
Thumps up if you want the BND to stop torturing my parents
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, safe, and envelope, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some even say they hear, do it.
@TheNeonTide its the only way to transport it, in case the shuttle lands elsewhere...the shuttle is way too heavy to take off and fly on its own. plus its not really geared for atmospheric fligh on its own (unless its on a landing approach)
ISS / space shuttle is a hoax. There are no "astronauts" in the rocket launched from Cape Canaveral, as there were no "astronauts" in any Apollo, Soyuz & Co.
Russia's Putin has shown long ago that he would soon put an end to this hoax, staged by the US and the Soviet Union for decades.
If something goes wrong during landing and the shuttle can't land for whatever reason, can it sustain itself in flight until it's able to land somewhere else? Or does it just keep falling to earth?
@Rushfan32935 - once it reenters the Earth's atmosphere, the shuttle orbiter is a glider with no power other than the manoevering thrusters it uses in orbit, which are next to useless at low altitude. So no, it can't sustain itself in flight.
Because,asshole,the last separation was in october 1977 with the SS "Enterprise".So,you were still in the balls of your father if you are 24 actually and playing Call of duty on your profile.Lier...
If The Wright Brothers would see this, I can't even imagine what their reaction would be. Let alone telling that the one at the top is a spacecraft launched by a rocket and returns as a glider.
@meteor4163 i thought Santos Dumont (Brazilian_ built the first Airplane for me the Wright Brothers built a Jumping machine that jumped high and long so it looked like it flew but thats my Opinion in Brazil we Beleive in Santos dumont in USA you beleive it was the wright brothers
@meteor4163 I guess one of the Wright Brother's did live long enough to see some F-14 Jets if I'm not mistaken, or some kind of jet planes. The other brother died early, and always thought he would die early, why would he think that ? I don't get it ? I wish we could go back to the days when American's were innovators and not just Walmart Consumers of made in China products ! Buy American made only, who cares if you have to pay more, your supporting your country !
where is the clip of being towed out from? Which orbiter and what airport? Last clip of landing clearly well-after 1982.. it's Columbia and the name is in the "right" spot.. Until 1986 Columbia's name was on the payload bay doors.
@aimhigh59 Uhhh. yes it did!! Look at some photos dumbass. Or give me your email and I'll send some to you. Columbia had ner name on the payload bay doors until after the loss of Challenger, then it was re-done. All others would've been on the payload bay doors, too, until they realized when the doors open on orbit, you can't see the name.
No, the shuttle itself doesn't create any lift, that would be bad for the 747's aerodynamics. An empty shuttle orbiter weights around 75 tons, that's well below the maximum capacity the 747 can handle. The much bigger problem is the huge drag the shuttle creates, drastically limiting it's max. range below 2.000km.
@mrmaster245 Its actually to provide more yaw stability, the shuttle creates so much drag in front of the center of gravity it needs a larger vertical stabilizer.
@Triundi How do you figure? It's worked for years and never had any problems. If mounting the shuttle onto a jumbo jet gets it from one place to another, I would say it's not such a bad idea.
@Blimp07Productions Lol, just look at it! Sure, it might work; but anyone who hadn't seen the math would have thought it was a crazy idea when the idea first came up.
@Triundi And how does that make it the worst idea ever? I'd say it's not too bad of an idea. I agree that at first I would think it's a crazy idea too but after the math has been done and all that, I see now that it's actually a very good idea.
LIER! Because the last separation was in october 1977 with the SS "Enterprise".So,you were still in the balls of your father if you are 24 actually and playing Call of duty on your profile.Lier...
Because,asshole,the last separation was in october 1977 with the SS "Enterprise".So,you were still in the balls of your father if you are 24 actually and playing Call of duty on your profile.Lier...
in 1987 I looked out my office window near Dulles airport and saw this fly right past my window... 747 with a shuttle on back.... theres something you dont see everyday
JerichoDitch2 1 week ago
somebody quick start the shuttle
walrisOrgasm 1 week ago
@cihper2 hahahaha
xXDutchScoPeZzXx 1 month ago
So is this like, airplane porn?
cihper2 1 month ago
747 + space shuttle having sex = ???
yoDog421 1 month ago in playlist Aircraft
@yoDog421 no, it's AN 225 "Mriya" ("dream") plus "Buran" - Soviet space shuttle.
mk120d 4 weeks ago
@mk120d Awesome!
yoDog421 4 weeks ago
@mk120d Uhm, that is a Boeing 747 converted to a Nasa Shuttle Carrier...
Elthehablo 3 weeks ago
@Elthehablo yes, you right, my mistake.
mk120d 3 weeks ago
The queen of the skies is not pregnant. :P
h5network 1 month ago
I really just don't see the reason to make a plane with a spaceshuttle above.
PS3Original 1 month ago
And thats how planes are made. lol
baadspelur2 2 months ago
mom and baby :D
BloodThirsty1986 2 months ago
No the 747 is going to have interracial commercial space shuttle babies!! :D
RandomDirectors 2 months ago
lol, the 747 is gonna have space shuttle babies
FastLife79 2 months ago
SURPRISE BUTTSECKS
TrollingVeteran 2 months ago
is that the b747 or something else?
mwmatthewkc51 2 months ago
@mwmatthewkc51 its an antov 225 i think
BThoreson09 2 months ago
@BThoreson09 no because antovs have 3 angines on the side, contains more wheels, and the tale is differnet
mwmatthewkc51 2 months ago
@BThoreson09 @BThoreson09 yeah it actually is the b 747 after watching this video: antonov an-225 mriya/buran shuttle nato code... by jatlavaksolider
mwmatthewkc51 2 months ago
so this is how they make more planes...
SPARTAN9999999991 2 months ago
Black birrdd
xXthePSPmasterXx 2 months ago
***David Attenborough voice***
And while it is the mating season an land, its far from different in the skies. As demonstrated in this clip of a couple getting ready to mate in the air. when it comes back down it will be pregnant with f-16 fighter jest soon to grow into and airbus A380
badwolfshamma 2 months ago
We saw this several times, whenever the Shuttle was forced -- due to bad weather, in Florida --- to land at Edwards A.F.B., Ca.
It then went back, "piggy-back" fashion, as in this video , to Florida.
.
MarieHarperable 2 months ago
omg, are they mating?
kellycutie77 3 months ago 10
I totally misunderstood the title... I thought the 747 was gonna land on an aircraft carrier with that shuttle on it's back.
Silly me.
mahdogzbite 4 months ago
WTF THEY DIDN"T ACTUALLY SHOW THE LANDING!!!!
BadNiedernauer 4 months ago
In 1971 a guy named Kyle and his gf Emily entered a house that claimed people's lives.the next day a guy named Alex saw finger nail marks on the door
soccermusic1000 4 months ago
@soccermusic1000 Duuuu Duuuuuh DUUUUUUUUUM
CrazyWoWGamer 4 months ago 2
@soccermusic1000 Epic fail.
AnkhorDraven 4 months ago
flying fuck.....
usefortouch 5 months ago
It's sex...
SuperAnimeFanClub 6 months ago 9
@adoviv95 dude what are you smoking that a 747 and if that were a 787 it what still be on the runway because it couldn't support the weight.
strikerz890 6 months ago
Everybody always forgets about Enterprise!
Engage777 6 months ago
I love how this was even an option
Anthonyh47715 6 months ago
He's wondering where the hell the space shuttle is.
PICLex 6 months ago
no sound..... :(
ghettomuecke 6 months ago
'
american space shuttle and jumbo jetplane are the best in the world,,,
ussr russia is so cheap, copy steal, low life, poor buran shuttle with an225
bestamerica 6 months ago
the pilot is millionaire xD
Lolahorselove 7 months ago
Fantastic Video
Toskana135 7 months ago
how does that thing fly??
jm431 7 months ago
@jm431 There are four forces... Thrust, lift, weight, and drag... I'm not getting into it lol.
EchoNiiner 6 months ago
is this just for transportation? LIke the spacecraft has returned from space, and this is just a way to take it back to nasa? I know these ae dumb questions. I just want to know whats going on here.
caveman357 7 months ago
@caveman357 - Years ago if I remember correctly, the space shuttle would land out in the west at an Air Force Base. I think it was too risky to others to land in Florida. But with new navigation technology they can now land in Florida. Though they would land elsewhere if the weather was bad in Florida. They used the 747 to fly it back since the space shuttle can't fly on its own. I remember as a kid watching it land at Kellies Air Force Base to refuel before going to Florida.
AtlRacerBoyz 6 months ago
@AtlRacerBoyz The only reason the shuttle landed at Edwards AF base in California was because of bad weather in Florida or mods that were done to the orbiters. They tested the mods at Edwards. Navigation was the same at both locations. GPS was added to the orbiters years ago and used in both locations...
aimhigh59 6 months ago
Copycats, Russians did it first.
123ATOM321 7 months ago 3
@123ATOM321 And Germany came up with the whole concept.
Mycophilliac 7 months ago in playlist Watch Later #2
I can just imagine the discussion at NASA: they're trying to design a special plane to take the shuttle up to the stratosphere and someone says, "Why not just put it on the back of a 747?"
Morganizer 7 months ago
@Morganizer That was a 787, just to let you know. On a 747, the shuttle would smash through it.
AdiViv95 7 months ago
@AdiViv95 You are wrong, sir. The plane is obviously a 747.
missngbrownie 7 months ago
@AdiViv95 it is a 747...
jm431 7 months ago
@AdiViv95 Incorrect, it's a 747. NASA has never owned any 787's.
rassmith78 6 months ago
@AdiViv95 Its a 747 and amazingly enough, the shuttle doesnt smash through it. Not one time in its 30 years of service did those planes ever have a problem lifting the shuttle
Baronstone 6 months ago
Looks like radioactive flyes having sex
PILUPACKSXXX 7 months ago
i work on aircraft almost everyday, but this still amazes me. i have to laugh :P
aceTL87 7 months ago
But why?
Katers311 7 months ago
well... have you seen the superman movie? what if a malfunction happens like in the movie, there wont be any superman near by to rescue everyone.... its no go. very very dangerous, considering the 747 is carrying people... would be better if special 474 were built only for this purpose....
180TheDragon 8 months ago
well... have you seen the superman movie? what if a malfunction like happens like in the movie, there wont be any superman near by to rescue everyone.... its no go. very very dangerous, considering the 747 is carrying people... would be better if special 474 were built only for this purpose....
180TheDragon 8 months ago
i heard you like boeing
so we put a boeing space shuttle on a boeing 747 so you can fly in a boeing while you fly on a boeing
TwistedComplex 8 months ago
this plane pretty much just screws physics in the asshole
warnock881 8 months ago
this would be more exciting to see the shuttle carry the 747
millsathn 8 months ago
I've always wondered this.. I'm guessing the shuttle has no fuel but what is the empty weight? does the 747 need special support for the shuttle on top?
SubaruB4RSK 8 months ago
@SubaruB4RSK The 747 is gutted on the inside with fuselage reinforcements. The residual fuels are removed for the most part but that doesnt add much weight. Depending what orbiter your talking about, the weight is 185,000 to 200,000 pounds. Also the payload bay usually has some kind of returning payload in it. Todays 747's can carry twice that weight. So the orbiters weight is not a problem.
aimhigh59 7 months ago
@aimhigh59 Thanks so much for clearing that up!
SubaruB4RSK 7 months ago
Amazing
cash212money172 8 months ago
Aaawwww!!!
amlegobee 8 months ago
baby airplane: weeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!....one more!!!
junemercado 8 months ago
First see in my life.anwar.bangladesh
Anwar5976 8 months ago
Wow that's crazy
IpodGameloft 8 months ago
tuyet
klongklee 8 months ago
Comment removed
runningshoe1000 9 months ago
SO CUTE :)
click7crasH 9 months ago
gay
husnainhyder 9 months ago
IDIOT where is the landing, i only see it almost touch the ground -.-"
redlinerumble3 9 months ago
I listen to whale music.
sora41333 9 months ago
@sora41333 lol
XGhOsT141X 8 months ago
未だに不思議でたまらない~~~
こんなに重い物が宙に浮き飛ぶのは・・・^^;
devil7954 9 months ago
cute
godcoinu 9 months ago
why does it takeoff and comes backi with the shuttle
namenone133 9 months ago
mummy taking junior for a ride.
josephsaliba79 9 months ago
there not using rocket any more there using dual bullet
julius16465964 9 months ago
just a bit top heavy....
mbudd121 9 months ago
i thought two planes were fucking
TheOneFromMW2 9 months ago
My brother Markus Bott had been tortured during 5.5 years by the German BND,the former GESTAPO. I recorded more than 100 videotapes which ended up in the legal system. My brother was tortured during 1.5 years despite several legal procedures pending. He was assassinated on July 11th 2009 because of our homepage, linked on my channel, and our book Der Totalitäre Staat. If my homepage disappears,the BND will have assassinated me as well
Thumps up if you want the BND to stop torturing my parents
wwwtotalitaerde 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch a Pre-January 8th copy of Inception. Listen closely when the actors say imagine, reality, safe, and envelope, or point pistols. You'll hear the words, Loughner, offin' her, part of the word Giffords, and much more. Some even say they hear, do it.
jamestargetedindiv 10 months ago
y cant they jst fly the shuttle by itself?/
TheRoyalFuzzybug 10 months ago
@TheRoyalFuzzybug With what engines?
AustralianPyromaniac 10 months ago
i wonder what the 747 handles like with the shuttle
taterfamine 10 months ago
I've trained for the Fra Mauro highlands... and this is FLIGHT SURGEON HORSESHIT, Deke!
gameshowkid222 10 months ago
I've trained for the Fra Mauro highlands... and this is FLIGHT SURGEON HORSESHIT, Deke!
gameshowkid222 10 months ago
is plane porn on youtube allowed???
MegaDadaClub 10 months ago
i still dont understand why this is necessary
TheNeonTide 10 months ago
@TheNeonTide If the Shuttle couldn't land at Canaveral and had to land at Edwards instead, this was the way to get it back to the launcher in FL.
336kgf 10 months ago
@TheNeonTide its the only way to transport it, in case the shuttle lands elsewhere...the shuttle is way too heavy to take off and fly on its own. plus its not really geared for atmospheric fligh on its own (unless its on a landing approach)
mbenzsl2000 10 months ago
whew and wow awsome
oinei 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nasa-hoaxes DOT blogspot.com
Take your time to read the links.
----
ISS / space shuttle is a hoax. There are no "astronauts" in the rocket launched from Cape Canaveral, as there were no "astronauts" in any Apollo, Soyuz & Co.
Russia's Putin has shown long ago that he would soon put an end to this hoax, staged by the US and the Soviet Union for decades.
-----
Truth666 10 months ago
Nasa a world of creation ...
myownmedia 10 months ago
If something goes wrong during landing and the shuttle can't land for whatever reason, can it sustain itself in flight until it's able to land somewhere else? Or does it just keep falling to earth?
Rushfan32935 10 months ago
@Rushfan32935 - once it reenters the Earth's atmosphere, the shuttle orbiter is a glider with no power other than the manoevering thrusters it uses in orbit, which are next to useless at low altitude. So no, it can't sustain itself in flight.
JBofBrisbane 10 months ago
A380 is better :) or antonov 225
monstrum467 10 months ago
i've seen those pass by near Antwerp, belgium, Europe, many years ago. Don't remember anymore when it happened.
jovdh 11 months ago
mechanical sex
MsTroller1 11 months ago
Boeing 747's power..
Vndemir 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Boeing 747's power..
Vndemir 11 months ago
Boeing 747's power..
Vndemir 11 months ago
We put a shuttle on yo plane so you can fly while you fly
AlexTubed 11 months ago 2
SUPERMAN?
monkeynuts76 11 months ago
Because,asshole,the last separation was in october 1977 with the SS "Enterprise".So,you were still in the balls of your father if you are 24 actually and playing Call of duty on your profile.Lier...
s3fredo 11 months ago 5
@s3fredo average gamer is 30, just a thought.
PhotoShopChannel 4 months ago
The most impressive of all is the Antonov 225 with the "Bouran" shutlle on top.Salon du Bourget 1989 in France.
s3fredo 11 months ago
The Space Shuttle is fucking the 747 Carrier xDD
GameTubeHD 11 months ago
piggy back on steroids
ripemind 11 months ago
It's like daddy airplane take's baby airplane for a ride, how cute!
denn1251is 1 year ago 84
daddy's carrying his son
papan1990 1 year ago
If The Wright Brothers would see this, I can't even imagine what their reaction would be. Let alone telling that the one at the top is a spacecraft launched by a rocket and returns as a glider.
meteor4163 1 year ago 128
@meteor4163 i thought Santos Dumont (Brazilian_ built the first Airplane for me the Wright Brothers built a Jumping machine that jumped high and long so it looked like it flew but thats my Opinion in Brazil we Beleive in Santos dumont in USA you beleive it was the wright brothers
jasincl 1 year ago
@meteor4163 I think they'd go, "Get that brick with wings off that thing!"
FALCO64125 10 months ago
@meteor4163 I guess one of the Wright Brother's did live long enough to see some F-14 Jets if I'm not mistaken, or some kind of jet planes. The other brother died early, and always thought he would die early, why would he think that ? I don't get it ? I wish we could go back to the days when American's were innovators and not just Walmart Consumers of made in China products ! Buy American made only, who cares if you have to pay more, your supporting your country !
larryjohnny 9 months ago
@meteor4163 they would probably faint from disbeleif
lilguy49 7 months ago
@meteor4163 imagine there reaction to everything that is around.
yoyoyoyoshua 5 months ago
plane doggy
0MetalllicA 1 year ago
...you cut off the landing!
airbird747 1 year ago
@airbird747 It's because he stole it from a user
SlittyDrake 1 year ago
wow the space shuttle wanst carrieing it. if you relise the wing on the plane would of had burn marks on it at the end and there isnt
dtnmatt 1 year ago
no pressure... you just $1.7 billion on your back
mvpdlrg 1 year ago 2
Will we ever see one of these on a A-380
Orangebike666 1 year ago
@Orangebike666 probably not...the shuttle program is over or is ending very very soon.
TheNikkonish 1 year ago
@TheNikkonish That's sad
Orangebike666 1 year ago
Why? Because we can! USA USA USA ahahah.
durhamdf 1 year ago
i russia the schuttle fly the jumbo xD
TheIronMuffin 1 year ago 2
HAHAHA when I first saw the picture before to click on it, it seemed so fake that I thought I was gonna get rick rolled!
sekahkiller 1 year ago
where is the clip of being towed out from? Which orbiter and what airport? Last clip of landing clearly well-after 1982.. it's Columbia and the name is in the "right" spot.. Until 1986 Columbia's name was on the payload bay doors.
John19182004 1 year ago
@John19182004 No orbiter ever had its name painted on their P/L bay doors.
aimhigh59 1 year ago
@aimhigh59 Uhhh. yes it did!! Look at some photos dumbass. Or give me your email and I'll send some to you. Columbia had ner name on the payload bay doors until after the loss of Challenger, then it was re-done. All others would've been on the payload bay doors, too, until they realized when the doors open on orbit, you can't see the name.
John19182004 1 year ago
@John19182004 Dont understand the foul language but yes your right. Early in the program they did. I was thinking on top of the P/L doors.
aimhigh59 1 year ago
its like the seatbelt sign is turned on pls sit back in your seats we are haveing slight turbulance
lachrox247 1 year ago
chuck norris can stop a that airplane with his dick.
looper310 1 year ago
@looper310 Hahaha, eat that, Superman
GrimmReeferX 1 year ago
BORING .....THIS TECHNOLOGY OF TODAY SUCK .
egli002 1 year ago
so thats how airplanes are made!!!
Ghood000 1 year ago
HOW!?
t1oxETy 1 year ago
Superman to the rescue
TheMrawsome1 1 year ago
It's probably not as much work for the 747 once it gets going. The shuttle must add some lift for it.
Jrink30 1 year ago
@Jrink30
No, the shuttle itself doesn't create any lift, that would be bad for the 747's aerodynamics. An empty shuttle orbiter weights around 75 tons, that's well below the maximum capacity the 747 can handle. The much bigger problem is the huge drag the shuttle creates, drastically limiting it's max. range below 2.000km.
blablubb12345 1 year ago
@blablubb12345 Also dont forget most of the time that a payload is returned as well making this ferry flight even heavier for the 747 to carry.
aimhigh59 1 year ago
Holy shit, were crashing, everybody get into the space shuttle!
vilag001 1 year ago 2
what class is the roof?
HandsUpProductions 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CAT POO HAS BEEN FOUND ON A DISTANT PLANET !!! the unbelievable truth is in the video spacecat 175
christophehersent 1 year ago
I can't believe a 747 flies in the first place, so this is amazing
metalairplanes 1 year ago
I wonder if the shuttle wings provide any additional lift to the system...
Andyman3k 1 year ago
That rig is so damn top heave they added more control surfaces on the tail end
mrmaster245 1 year ago
@mrmaster245 well noticed =) that is awesome
rulz492 1 year ago
@mrmaster245 Its actually to provide more yaw stability, the shuttle creates so much drag in front of the center of gravity it needs a larger vertical stabilizer.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
*So hard right now*
shilo1414 1 year ago
Does the 747 need a special landing gear?
Thompoux 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CAT POO HAS BEEN FOUND ON A DISTANT PLANET !! The unbelievable truth is in the video spacecat 175
christophehersent 1 year ago
it woulf be crazy is the shuttle dosent take off and boing goes to space
rockhopper123452 1 year ago
Worst idea ever.
Triundi 1 year ago
@Triundi How do you figure? It's worked for years and never had any problems. If mounting the shuttle onto a jumbo jet gets it from one place to another, I would say it's not such a bad idea.
Blimp07Productions 1 year ago
@Blimp07Productions Lol, just look at it! Sure, it might work; but anyone who hadn't seen the math would have thought it was a crazy idea when the idea first came up.
Triundi 1 year ago
@Triundi And how does that make it the worst idea ever? I'd say it's not too bad of an idea. I agree that at first I would think it's a crazy idea too but after the math has been done and all that, I see now that it's actually a very good idea.
Blimp07Productions 1 year ago
@Blimp07Productions You live life too literally. : )
Triundi 1 year ago
LOL...British Double Decker Bus Style....
thedeem0N 1 year ago
are they going to have little baby planes?? =)
caar780821 1 year ago
the drag on a regular 747 is crazy enough trust me i used to fly them and i never got used to takeoff drag but wat about that drag like seriously
Gottaluvoreocookies2 1 year ago
ive seen these two planes seperate in mid air in real life what a great thing to watch that was
BMXBOBO 1 year ago 21
@BMXBOBO ill bet your mommas proud
MrPiekutowski 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrPiekutowski no but yours was when i had my dick inside her
BMXBOBO 1 year ago
@BMXBOBO
lier
s3fredo 11 months ago
@s3fredo prove it dick head? because i can
BMXBOBO 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BMXBOBO
LIER! Because the last separation was in october 1977 with the SS "Enterprise".So,you were still in the balls of your father if you are 24 actually and playing Call of duty on your profile.Lier...
s3fredo 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BMXBOBO
Because,asshole,the last separation was in october 1977 with the SS "Enterprise".So,you were still in the balls of your father if you are 24 actually and playing Call of duty on your profile.Lier...
s3fredo 10 months ago
@BMXBOBO lol
mbenzsl2000 10 months ago
@mbenzsl2000 lol ;)
BMXBOBO 10 months ago
SOUND
dan68543 1 year ago
i heard they were going to to start using the 777 as the space shuttle ferry. is that true?
an225gd 1 year ago
@an225gd u saw it on a movie
luislaurencio 1 year ago
@an225gd Far to small and weak of a plane to lift that shuttle.
SciGuy013 1 year ago
@an225gd the 777 is only a 2 turbine plane and the 747 is 4
Millard97 1 year ago
it always fun and game till some one gets a bonner
cavemanbros 1 year ago
that flight was only 30 sec? damn i need to ride one with a shuttle
pottymouthpenguin 1 year ago