To continue, there will be things that we cannot understand or measure, simply because it may be beyond the capacity of the human brain to do so. We are not infinitely intelligent--there will be limits to what we can know and understand. Again, this should not be an excuse to evoke a supernatural deity. And as far as a vague "higher power"--again--we should not believe big claims for which there is no evidence.
Do I believe in anything immeasurable? Yes, that which is SUBJECTIVE. That is, abstract human ideas, such as justice, morality, love, loyalty, honor. These are important human ideas, but they do not exist objectively, and cannot be measured. But in no way, are subjective human ideas any sort of evidence of some sort of God. For something to exist objectively, it has to be measurable.
"some sort of entity or existence"--I was once in this stage also. What is the basis of this belief? Much of what you are describing as your belief is extremely vague, and doesn't seem to have any foundation whatsoever for why you believe it. I went from being a Bible-based Christian--largely because my family and community, to thinking the way you do, to describing myself as an agnostic, to finally realizing I was an atheist. Show me the hard evidence, then we can talk about a "higher power".
In an attempt to answer your questions. #1 Do I believe in anything immeasurable or outside of scientific measurement ? Answer - If something exists, it must, by definition have attributes. Those attributes have a value, even if we can't presently discern that value. #2 Trend of discovery - Yes, we will always discover more details about the universe that we previously did not know. #3 Not knowing every detail about the universe is not the same as believing in something for NO REASON.
You believe in a higher structure, a higher order, an after life. Why ? Besides the teachings of your religion, what evidence suggests that any of the millions upon billions upon trillions of lifeforms that have EVER lived on Earth, exist in some other realm or world or higher structure to life ? Can you point to where all this afterlife exists ? Any tests you can perform to show that just ONE such being from every creature that has ever lived, exists ? And it's NOT your imagination at work.
Our ability to measure or perceive reality has no bearing on whether or not the universe exists. Your beliefs inform your actions and having a world view that is most consistent with reality is always best. Believing in things when there is no evidence to suggest that those things exist is not a path to truth. If you care whether your beliefs are true, then those beliefs should have evidence that supports it, otherwise you may as well believe that a pixie sneezed the world into existence.
Scientists can't measure a Singularity right now, but as you pointed out they are constantly being able to measure smaller and smaller things. I'm pretty sure, considering the rate technology is advancing, IF we had enough time and there was a limited volume of things to measure; Everything could be measured. But, the universe is STILL expanding, and as far as we know there really is an infinite number of things out there. Hope that answers your question.
I personally believe you are possibly the most rational person questioning athiests I have ever seen. Kudos to you. I personally would call myself, well I guess you could call it "spiritual." I would be atheist, but for one my aunt has come back from being dead for a while, she came back with things she had only told one person. After she finally died, he shared those things with us, she had heard voices, familiar, running out of space. And my house for a while, had ghosts, what I saw changed me
But God can't be the largest thing existing, because there wouldn't be anything God would fit in; no place that it could exist in, because it would be larger than the place it would exist in.
You answered your question yourself; you can't measure something you don't know, neither can you think of it, nor prove it exists.
As something doesn't exist for you, you can't measure it.
So yes, there will always be things we can't measure.
The cat is there, the same way our vision is here. When I look at this computer screen I'm not seeing you with my brain, my eyes is capturing the light and turning that into electric signals, which my brain interprets and picks up things such as color, shapes, recognizable objects, etc...; the human brain turns this into understandable images very quickly.
You are right there is no cat in our head, yet the activity of the neurons represents "cat".
You were talking about trends of our discoveries. There is essentially one trend only: from simple knowledge to more complex, which is natural. It's funny to imagine, that scientists will prove some difficult theory and then come up with something more simple, that doesn't explain that much.
Well, so why we don't believe in any God? Because we don't have to. Science is essentially "what works". And it avoids adding unproven hypotheses in order to avoid "stop working" because of that addition.
The belief you describe fits in Dawking's term "a religion of gaps", worshiping unsolved mysteries of science. The fundamental difference between theist and atheist is, that atheist is perfectly fine with not knowing everything, Theist is scared of not knowing something, so he puts his God in all remaining scientific gaps. So yes, human body is quite limited, so there is a chance we won't ever know everything there is to know about.
"The following is my opinion and what I believe from my perspectives."
The universe cannot be measured due to it going on forever, and parallel Universes. So yes I believe there will be things that we cannot explain forever, so I just live for the day and have fun, I believe in ease of living and just having a good life and that is the point of life. We will never know for fact that there will be a god or not unless we ourselves die, so why bother? You are a very intelligent person btw.
Wow, so many atheists have commented! Go Team TBS!
I think @bu1ckgnx summed up my beliefs best: I equate order with God, Good Orderly Direction. That's God to me.
As for the afterlife, I think the biggest problems atheists have is not with believing in some kind of transendence of consiousness, but in fact, with tangible concepts of the afterlife, like Heaven and Hell.
As for me, I don't believe in Heaven and Hell. But I do believe in a transition of consciousness. As to where, I'm not sure.
I think there is a huge gap between acknowledgeing there are things we might never be able to measure and believeing in a God who is said to be unmeasurable.
As for your jump from complexety to "everything moves toward a God",
I don't see where you make that connection.
Yes, the universe is very big and complex, but I don't see where that proofs any form of Creator or Ruler.
As for the argument about 'holons' (spelling?) progressing towards the a god... it's a complete non sequitur. The notion of a "god" is simply not supported by *anything* we know about the Universe. The only sentiences we know of are us, there's no evidence that anything else is sentient (though sentiences evolved elsewhere, too), and "gods" (all 3000+) are simply anthropomorphications, a misapplication of empathy, projecting *our* model of mind onto inanimate things (even the Universe itself).
correction: I meant to say "sentiences MAY have evolved elsewhere".
We currently don't know, and that's one of those things we may *never* have a way of knowing.
In fact, our Universe has an event horizon, beyond which things exist what we can *never* know. Space itself is expanding. The further away a galaxy is, the faster it moves away from us (think of dots on a balloon that's being inflated). At a certain distance, they move away from us at the speed of light and are lost to us forever.
You say #3 is "kinda the same belief that Christians and other religious people have, that there's this intangible". NO! They don't believe in an unknowable "intangible", they believe in a hands-on father figure, with emotions, desires and needs, who speaks to people, affects their lives. They will sit at his side some day. It's the *opposite* of saying "I don't know".
You're just calling logic and order, God. The part that doesn't fit is when you claim you can survive your own death. That is where you step into the ridiculous. Also, science doesn't claim that the "trend" will continue forever into the micro and macro scales. The default is to withhold judgement. For now Heisninberg's Uncertainty Principle demonstrates that we can never know a particles position AND velocity at the same time. It's unclear if this will stand the test of time.
If something is immeasurable, then it's immeasurable. At no point in the past, present, or future, will it ever be measurable. It's immeasurable. Just because we couldn't measure certain things before, and can now, is not the same thing. Sub-atomic particles have always been measurable, we just didn't have the ability to measure them. But I digress.
To answer your question, NO, I do not believe in things that are immeasurable.....
More to the point, I think it's completely irrelevant to even speculate about such things. The world being what it is, with the rules we have in place, if something were in fact immeasurable, and completely outside of our realm of perception, then there's absolutely no way that we can perceive or understand such a thing. Trying to would border on lunacy.
i don't beleive in infinitely smaller parts nor infinitely larger things. there is bound to be a lower limit, it remains to be seen weather or not there is an upper limit. we do not fully understand space and time yet. however quantum entanglement implies that space and size are illusionary.
i do believe that there are things that we do not know exist and cannot measure. i do think that eventually we will discover all there is for us to discover. when i say "we" i mean humans. eventually humans will evolve into another form. what this form is capable of remains to be known.
We dont know what theyll discover when they find out what caused the bigbang,multiple universes,other dimensions,whatever.Its a logical rationalization that everythings part of something bigger,but whether if we are gonna end with a god or not,that's just a guess.If we do end up with a God and everything's part of something bigger,then that means God has to be part of something bigger too,and it goes on and on.Multiple universes is my guess.Good points dude,hope this answers your questions. :)
if you think about the word and the meaning there is no such thing as multiple "universes" as universe implies all that exists. there may be multiple miniverses that make up the universe and we exist on one of these miniverses. but there are no multiple universes. the word would not fit. =P
you know just in case this really mattered to you. i get what you are trying to say nonetheless.
The cat in my brain is imaginary,it doesn't exist in anyway,but of course that depends on your conception of what exists and what doesn't.I can consider your point,but you used a bad example,perhaps you could provide a better one.For example,we can measure water,according to you,what would be the inmensurable side of water? If it's the concept of water in our heads,of course we cannot measure that,is what our brain identifies as water.But we can physically measure water.
I'm assuming that by "something we couldn't measure in the past" you mean natural things, like,your example,molecules.Nobody believed in molecules before they were discovered because we didn't know they existed,but if before their discovering scientists had said there was a POSSIBILITY of their existence,then everybody would have been skeptical about it until it would be proven that it existed.Atheists are skeptical about the existence of unproven natural things,and deny supernatural beings.
My answer to your question would be (and yes i am an atheist) atheists would not "believe" anything that couldn't be measured proven or tested. They would consider the possibility of it(not talking about supernatural beings),but they wouldn't go as far as to say they are convinced that something exists even if it can't be tested proven or measured, which is the very definition of faith according to the Bible.
Sure this is a limit to how big or small things are now, and I appreciate Plank units. But in the time of Newton, gravity was a law. And Einstein blew that law aside. So it's very likely that plank units will be thrown aside at some point as well.
perhaps plank units will be thrown to the side, but i really doubt this. either way, as an atheist i have no faith in anything. there is a theory called superstrings or string theory that mathmatically explains a lot of events and even allows quantum physics and standard physics to work using the same mathmatical model. however i do not have faith that it is true. it simply works as is, it makes no testable predictions that we can test. so for now it remains a mystery.
That is, until you die, and realize he isn't even there. Perhaps you, my dear, are the one who should shut their mouth. And just so you know, you were, indeed, very very rude.
That's all really quite poetic, but the reality is that it is quite likely that your conception of "God" is fictional. Certainly, it may be comforting to imagine that an all-powerful and all-loving being exists, but there is no reason to believe in such an entity. The questions raised by both Theoretical and markberry555 and both sincere and thought provoking. To insist that they shut up merely because they question your conception of "God" is intellectually dishonest at best.
So, I dunno why my comment posted to the top, but just so we're clear, my critique was directed at Christianitygirly107, and not at you markberry555. Sorry. :-P
there is a limit 2 distance scales read about "plank units" and also the "uncertainty principle" and you will see that there is a limit to how small our "ruler" can be.
1. Humanity and the human spirit. That's imeasureable. 2. See Comte's Positivism. Psychology is extremely difficult. Sociology is insanely difficult. The more difficult a knowledge is, the more difficult the science about it is. 3. The trend stops if we run out of ideas. It's by knowing we do not know we are urged to find more. Belief in God is kinda bad that way because it suggests we already know the end and can stop researching the unknown.
Hey, majored in Computer Science. I'm really analytical - but I've applied it to human dynamics. I am going to get a graduate certificate in coaching later this year.
I don't think you and I have delved into this topic since college. Some day, we need to sit down and talk about this. I have answered your three questions, but will keep them to myself until our next lunch.
1. Yes "we" meaning i believe that there are things we cannot explain, but does that mean by defualt thats god?
2. Some take longer to discover, to this modern tech.. No trend, just discovery..
3. We don't know if it does end, no one knows.
4. Again, no trend, just discovery by obervation, It depends on whats acceptable but always challenged..
Your video takes too long :|... Nice try tho...
MY QUESTION
b/c we do not know does it make it god did it by defualt?
curemymind 2 months ago
To continue, there will be things that we cannot understand or measure, simply because it may be beyond the capacity of the human brain to do so. We are not infinitely intelligent--there will be limits to what we can know and understand. Again, this should not be an excuse to evoke a supernatural deity. And as far as a vague "higher power"--again--we should not believe big claims for which there is no evidence.
DandAinTac 7 months ago
Do I believe in anything immeasurable? Yes, that which is SUBJECTIVE. That is, abstract human ideas, such as justice, morality, love, loyalty, honor. These are important human ideas, but they do not exist objectively, and cannot be measured. But in no way, are subjective human ideas any sort of evidence of some sort of God. For something to exist objectively, it has to be measurable.
DandAinTac 7 months ago
"some sort of entity or existence"--I was once in this stage also. What is the basis of this belief? Much of what you are describing as your belief is extremely vague, and doesn't seem to have any foundation whatsoever for why you believe it. I went from being a Bible-based Christian--largely because my family and community, to thinking the way you do, to describing myself as an agnostic, to finally realizing I was an atheist. Show me the hard evidence, then we can talk about a "higher power".
DandAinTac 7 months ago
In an attempt to answer your questions. #1 Do I believe in anything immeasurable or outside of scientific measurement ? Answer - If something exists, it must, by definition have attributes. Those attributes have a value, even if we can't presently discern that value. #2 Trend of discovery - Yes, we will always discover more details about the universe that we previously did not know. #3 Not knowing every detail about the universe is not the same as believing in something for NO REASON.
Rahn127 8 months ago
You believe in a higher structure, a higher order, an after life. Why ? Besides the teachings of your religion, what evidence suggests that any of the millions upon billions upon trillions of lifeforms that have EVER lived on Earth, exist in some other realm or world or higher structure to life ? Can you point to where all this afterlife exists ? Any tests you can perform to show that just ONE such being from every creature that has ever lived, exists ? And it's NOT your imagination at work.
Rahn127 8 months ago
Our ability to measure or perceive reality has no bearing on whether or not the universe exists. Your beliefs inform your actions and having a world view that is most consistent with reality is always best. Believing in things when there is no evidence to suggest that those things exist is not a path to truth. If you care whether your beliefs are true, then those beliefs should have evidence that supports it, otherwise you may as well believe that a pixie sneezed the world into existence.
Rahn127 8 months ago
Scientists can't measure a Singularity right now, but as you pointed out they are constantly being able to measure smaller and smaller things. I'm pretty sure, considering the rate technology is advancing, IF we had enough time and there was a limited volume of things to measure; Everything could be measured. But, the universe is STILL expanding, and as far as we know there really is an infinite number of things out there. Hope that answers your question.
ShokujiAkai 1 year ago
Comment removed
ShokujiAkai 1 year ago
at current, there are almost certainly things we cannot measure.
I have no idea if there will always be things that are immeasurable, there may or may not be
simple, completely logical answers that in no way suggest any higher power, I have just won
TheMagnoxian 1 year ago
I personally believe you are possibly the most rational person questioning athiests I have ever seen. Kudos to you. I personally would call myself, well I guess you could call it "spiritual." I would be atheist, but for one my aunt has come back from being dead for a while, she came back with things she had only told one person. After she finally died, he shared those things with us, she had heard voices, familiar, running out of space. And my house for a while, had ghosts, what I saw changed me
Rammstein2720 1 year ago
2. Yes, we will be discovering other universes.
3. In that case, it will never end as there're an infinite amount of universes in the multiverse.
You are mistaken about the 'pictures' in your brain. In fact, in Japan (University of Hiroshima I believe, all those names look like eachother XD)
they're doing this kind of research and are able to 'print' your thoughts using an MRI scanner.
4. I believe that strings are the smallest things and the multiverse is the largest.
LanteanKnight 1 year ago
1. Yes, for the moment.
But God can't be the largest thing existing, because there wouldn't be anything God would fit in; no place that it could exist in, because it would be larger than the place it would exist in.
You answered your question yourself; you can't measure something you don't know, neither can you think of it, nor prove it exists.
As something doesn't exist for you, you can't measure it.
So yes, there will always be things we can't measure.
LanteanKnight 1 year ago
The cat is there, the same way our vision is here. When I look at this computer screen I'm not seeing you with my brain, my eyes is capturing the light and turning that into electric signals, which my brain interprets and picks up things such as color, shapes, recognizable objects, etc...; the human brain turns this into understandable images very quickly.
You are right there is no cat in our head, yet the activity of the neurons represents "cat".
chon4186 2 years ago
You were talking about trends of our discoveries. There is essentially one trend only: from simple knowledge to more complex, which is natural. It's funny to imagine, that scientists will prove some difficult theory and then come up with something more simple, that doesn't explain that much.
Well, so why we don't believe in any God? Because we don't have to. Science is essentially "what works". And it avoids adding unproven hypotheses in order to avoid "stop working" because of that addition.
Ceberuss 2 years ago
The belief you describe fits in Dawking's term "a religion of gaps", worshiping unsolved mysteries of science. The fundamental difference between theist and atheist is, that atheist is perfectly fine with not knowing everything, Theist is scared of not knowing something, so he puts his God in all remaining scientific gaps. So yes, human body is quite limited, so there is a chance we won't ever know everything there is to know about.
Ceberuss 2 years ago
"The following is my opinion and what I believe from my perspectives."
The universe cannot be measured due to it going on forever, and parallel Universes. So yes I believe there will be things that we cannot explain forever, so I just live for the day and have fun, I believe in ease of living and just having a good life and that is the point of life. We will never know for fact that there will be a god or not unless we ourselves die, so why bother? You are a very intelligent person btw.
CrankItEveryDay 2 years ago
Comment removed
2plus4equalschair 2 years ago
Wow, so many atheists have commented! Go Team TBS!
I think @bu1ckgnx summed up my beliefs best: I equate order with God, Good Orderly Direction. That's God to me.
As for the afterlife, I think the biggest problems atheists have is not with believing in some kind of transendence of consiousness, but in fact, with tangible concepts of the afterlife, like Heaven and Hell.
As for me, I don't believe in Heaven and Hell. But I do believe in a transition of consciousness. As to where, I'm not sure.
markberry555 2 years ago
I think there is a huge gap between acknowledgeing there are things we might never be able to measure and believeing in a God who is said to be unmeasurable.
As for your jump from complexety to "everything moves toward a God",
I don't see where you make that connection.
Yes, the universe is very big and complex, but I don't see where that proofs any form of Creator or Ruler.
Xigano1 2 years ago
As for the argument about 'holons' (spelling?) progressing towards the a god... it's a complete non sequitur. The notion of a "god" is simply not supported by *anything* we know about the Universe. The only sentiences we know of are us, there's no evidence that anything else is sentient (though sentiences evolved elsewhere, too), and "gods" (all 3000+) are simply anthropomorphications, a misapplication of empathy, projecting *our* model of mind onto inanimate things (even the Universe itself).
ReductioAdAbsurdum 3 years ago
correction: I meant to say "sentiences MAY have evolved elsewhere".
We currently don't know, and that's one of those things we may *never* have a way of knowing.
In fact, our Universe has an event horizon, beyond which things exist what we can *never* know. Space itself is expanding. The further away a galaxy is, the faster it moves away from us (think of dots on a balloon that's being inflated). At a certain distance, they move away from us at the speed of light and are lost to us forever.
ReductioAdAbsurdum 3 years ago
1. There are already things we can't measure.
2. Yes.
3. Yes; there are things we will never know.
You say #3 is "kinda the same belief that Christians and other religious people have, that there's this intangible". NO! They don't believe in an unknowable "intangible", they believe in a hands-on father figure, with emotions, desires and needs, who speaks to people, affects their lives. They will sit at his side some day. It's the *opposite* of saying "I don't know".
ReductioAdAbsurdum 3 years ago
You're just calling logic and order, God. The part that doesn't fit is when you claim you can survive your own death. That is where you step into the ridiculous. Also, science doesn't claim that the "trend" will continue forever into the micro and macro scales. The default is to withhold judgement. For now Heisninberg's Uncertainty Principle demonstrates that we can never know a particles position AND velocity at the same time. It's unclear if this will stand the test of time.
bu1ckgnx 3 years ago
what a hippie.
what we don't know is what we don't know, claiming to know what science does not know is called imaginary
lianghaochen 3 years ago
If something is immeasurable, then it's immeasurable. At no point in the past, present, or future, will it ever be measurable. It's immeasurable. Just because we couldn't measure certain things before, and can now, is not the same thing. Sub-atomic particles have always been measurable, we just didn't have the ability to measure them. But I digress.
To answer your question, NO, I do not believe in things that are immeasurable.....
mikech78 3 years ago
More to the point, I think it's completely irrelevant to even speculate about such things. The world being what it is, with the rules we have in place, if something were in fact immeasurable, and completely outside of our realm of perception, then there's absolutely no way that we can perceive or understand such a thing. Trying to would border on lunacy.
mikech78 3 years ago
i don't beleive in infinitely smaller parts nor infinitely larger things. there is bound to be a lower limit, it remains to be seen weather or not there is an upper limit. we do not fully understand space and time yet. however quantum entanglement implies that space and size are illusionary.
greycloud24 3 years ago
i do believe that there are things that we do not know exist and cannot measure. i do think that eventually we will discover all there is for us to discover. when i say "we" i mean humans. eventually humans will evolve into another form. what this form is capable of remains to be known.
greycloud24 3 years ago
We dont know what theyll discover when they find out what caused the bigbang,multiple universes,other dimensions,whatever.Its a logical rationalization that everythings part of something bigger,but whether if we are gonna end with a god or not,that's just a guess.If we do end up with a God and everything's part of something bigger,then that means God has to be part of something bigger too,and it goes on and on.Multiple universes is my guess.Good points dude,hope this answers your questions. :)
Alaxtor 3 years ago
if you think about the word and the meaning there is no such thing as multiple "universes" as universe implies all that exists. there may be multiple miniverses that make up the universe and we exist on one of these miniverses. but there are no multiple universes. the word would not fit. =P
you know just in case this really mattered to you. i get what you are trying to say nonetheless.
greycloud24 3 years ago
The cat in my brain is imaginary,it doesn't exist in anyway,but of course that depends on your conception of what exists and what doesn't.I can consider your point,but you used a bad example,perhaps you could provide a better one.For example,we can measure water,according to you,what would be the inmensurable side of water? If it's the concept of water in our heads,of course we cannot measure that,is what our brain identifies as water.But we can physically measure water.
Alaxtor 3 years ago
I'm assuming that by "something we couldn't measure in the past" you mean natural things, like,your example,molecules.Nobody believed in molecules before they were discovered because we didn't know they existed,but if before their discovering scientists had said there was a POSSIBILITY of their existence,then everybody would have been skeptical about it until it would be proven that it existed.Atheists are skeptical about the existence of unproven natural things,and deny supernatural beings.
Alaxtor 3 years ago
My answer to your question would be (and yes i am an atheist) atheists would not "believe" anything that couldn't be measured proven or tested. They would consider the possibility of it(not talking about supernatural beings),but they wouldn't go as far as to say they are convinced that something exists even if it can't be tested proven or measured, which is the very definition of faith according to the Bible.
Alaxtor 3 years ago
Rob,
Sure this is a limit to how big or small things are now, and I appreciate Plank units. But in the time of Newton, gravity was a law. And Einstein blew that law aside. So it's very likely that plank units will be thrown aside at some point as well.
Either way, good points!
markberry555 3 years ago
perhaps plank units will be thrown to the side, but i really doubt this. either way, as an atheist i have no faith in anything. there is a theory called superstrings or string theory that mathmatically explains a lot of events and even allows quantum physics and standard physics to work using the same mathmatical model. however i do not have faith that it is true. it simply works as is, it makes no testable predictions that we can test. so for now it remains a mystery.
greycloud24 3 years ago
Right... he won't fail you.
That is, until you die, and realize he isn't even there. Perhaps you, my dear, are the one who should shut their mouth. And just so you know, you were, indeed, very very rude.
lambofgodpwns 3 years ago
That's all really quite poetic, but the reality is that it is quite likely that your conception of "God" is fictional. Certainly, it may be comforting to imagine that an all-powerful and all-loving being exists, but there is no reason to believe in such an entity. The questions raised by both Theoretical and markberry555 and both sincere and thought provoking. To insist that they shut up merely because they question your conception of "God" is intellectually dishonest at best.
RMSanford 3 years ago
So, I dunno why my comment posted to the top, but just so we're clear, my critique was directed at Christianitygirly107, and not at you markberry555. Sorry. :-P
RMSanford 3 years ago
there is a limit 2 distance scales read about "plank units" and also the "uncertainty principle" and you will see that there is a limit to how small our "ruler" can be.
rob0is0god 3 years ago
crap
Oscarsomething 3 years ago
1. Humanity and the human spirit. That's imeasureable. 2. See Comte's Positivism. Psychology is extremely difficult. Sociology is insanely difficult. The more difficult a knowledge is, the more difficult the science about it is. 3. The trend stops if we run out of ideas. It's by knowing we do not know we are urged to find more. Belief in God is kinda bad that way because it suggests we already know the end and can stop researching the unknown.
JemyM 3 years ago
Great video, good questions. I think I agree with just about everything you said. Did TheoreticalBullshit ever answer these questions?
CalvinCoooolidge 4 years ago
I like your eyes.... may i ask what you studied in college? what was your major and minor if you had one?
boportsmouth 4 years ago
Hey, majored in Computer Science. I'm really analytical - but I've applied it to human dynamics. I am going to get a graduate certificate in coaching later this year.
markberry555 4 years ago
I don't think you and I have delved into this topic since college. Some day, we need to sit down and talk about this. I have answered your three questions, but will keep them to myself until our next lunch.
arcoles4 4 years ago
Wha... you don't want the whole world to know the interworkings of your mind? Come play in the street with me. It's fun! >>;-)
Anytime, Andrew. Give a holla' when you are in town!
markberry555 4 years ago