Added: 2 years ago
From: NewOnABCTV
Views: 17,524
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (70)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "The Reason for circumcision is to bring about a decrease in sexual intercourse and a weakening of the organ in question, so that this activity be diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible. The bodily pain caused to that member is the real purpose of circumcision. Violent concupiscence and lust that goes beyond what is needed are diminished."

    ------------------------------­------------------------------­---

    Moses Maimonides (Rabbi, Philosopher, Scholar, Physician) 1135-1204 AD

  • four balls? ZOMG

  • @richikaf In people with big enough jaws, they're just teeth. We don't remove them if we don't have to.

  • Man this is fucked up!

  • hahhahahahahahahahahahaha

  • Ouch.....damn.....

  • Hilarious!

  • After all that both men shook hands to conclude their meeting.... without washing their hands.. hahahahaha.

    Gaz

  • If he is mocking, I would never know it. It does seem like he is interested in restoring his foreskin. And why not? Many, many men who have lost part of their penis to infant circumcision are restoring foreskin to regain that important part of their bodies.

  • if god created little bags to carry cheese around in, then what are those plastic things i buy at the supermarket??

  • "wtf!!, why is he dropping his pants. OH NO!! Old guy nutz"

  • lololololololololololololololo­lololololololol

  • argh this is just too funny XD

  • Sorry to be pedantic, but it's pondus JudaicUM (not JudaicA). They repeat it so many times it's hard to overlook it.

  • The Jews didn't practice genital mutilation in the beginning. It wasn't until that moron Abraham did something to his own genitals and commanded everyone else do the same. He didn't do to himself what they do to boys today, because if he had he would have bled to death. This is all legend and superstition, and basically a crime when performed on minors. The word "circumcision" isn't mentioned anywhere in the Koran.

  • I agree. If god requires us to circumcise our boys because as is written in the christian bible, that we are flawed in our makeup, then why didn't god create us without this 'flaw' of having a foreskin? Nothing ever makes sense when a god becomes involved. I think if god is so mysterious, then it becomes a variable that has no scope. It therefore doesn't matter if god exists or not, its all up to the people to believe in his existance or non-existance. I am a believer in god however. lol

  • @LOLDISNEYLAND lol, well God made sin and many things became flawed

  • LOL, good stuff! I want mine back too!

  • @mojo5157 - just so you know, he may be joking, but foreskin restoration IS real, you can find lots of vids on it here... I even have one =)

  • LOL HAHA! they just pull out their wangs and equip their unit

  • holy shit.

  • GAY????

  • Í hear theyve been stealing body parts in Gaza..whats next foreskins??????????????

  • What.... the... fuck.....

  • Amazing Video!! What great Energy!!! ONLY Good/Intelligent people, or Good-people know having a foreskin like the animals and women(clitoral hood), is the way how it was meant to be! Circumcision is for Evil, Dumb, Retarded or mislead People! What kind of GOD cut's off the end of a innocent baby's Dick? Why would any religious person worship a GOD that hates innocent human babies! These fucking controlling parents believe they have a right to violate another person's right! (what stupid logic!)

  • I love all the pro-circumcision nutcases in here. Bottom line : every single woman you ask will tell you that uncut men are better lovers. Reason being : they have more sensation, hence don't need to pummel away like a jackhammer to achieve orgasm. This means they can afford to spend more time pleasuring their woman. Of course, not all do, but they can.

  • I just asked three and they disagreed and said that your penis looks disgusting.

  • Again talking about how it LOOKS. Read my comment again, this time pay attention.

  • Do you not understand the word "also"?

  • and now I see I used the word 'and' and not 'also'. My bad. Let me rephrase: They disagreed with you, also they said that your penis looks disgusting.

  • ... oh yea, there's really nothing to back up that bogus "belief" that AIDS infection could be reduced by circumcision... it affects everybody in the same way regardless.

  • ... foreskin helps ease with sexual penetration much better than circumcised pricks. True shit... google it.

  • Yeah, and so does a cheap tube of K-Y Jelly.

  • @TheCorruptOrg or good ole spit from tha bitch haha.

  • Every part of the human body is there for a reason. People used to think the appendix was useless, but we now know it provides various functions. If history shows us anything consistently, it's that CUTTING shi*t off your body is not natural and generally does more harm than good. Plus there's a long history of bogus 'benefits' being pushed by the religious only to be proven wrong shortly after.

  • I am circumsised.

    Chicks love it.

    I swear it increases my chances of getting a blow job too....

  • I used to be dead against circumcision,but there is some evidence it reduces the risk of AIDS. I know,it sounds like a loony theory,and if I hadn't seen the report on the study in Africa,I'd have dismissed it as so much nonsense. There's a drive in South Africa to encourage circumcision(and condoms and education) in AIDS heavy areas. Of course,further studies could show it to be bunk,& hopefully a cure will be found to make it a non-issue anyway. Mutilating a human body is generally a bad idea.

  • Even if this was true (which it can't be, because Europe has a lower HIV rate than America, where Europe is almost entirely uncut, and America is almost entirely cut)... All this will do is make many circumcised men think they don't have to wear a condom, which will only increase the spread of HIV.

  • id never take my sons foreskin off.

  • um, who cares if somone hasnt got a foreskin!! i know a couple of people without them one was 12 when removed the other 8. there not mentaly scared and they worked fine! why do people even need to argue about these things! lol weirdos!

  • Because the foreskin contains more nerve endings than any other part of the penis. i.e., it's the best part.

  • Tender Loving Care Tugger lol

  • gotta love the hand shake at the end...lol! awkward!!!

  • :D good catch !

  • You can see quite a bulge in the drawers of the reporter when he's wearin the non-surgical foreskin restoration device.

    Ordinarily a restorer would choose looser pants like "relaxed cut" or "loose fit" Dockers.

    Foreskin - even restored foreskin - feels REALLY good. End all genital mutilation.

  • all genital mutilation is wrong and disgusting.

  • I guess John Safran's mocking tone & style is a bit lost on everybody who thinks he's now interested in restoring his foreskin. I'm sure he was more interested in showing his fellow Australians what a bunch of wackos we have here in the states.

    Way to represent there R.Wayne!

  • @ordinaryphenom

    Funny how altering the genitals of an infant is ok, but trying to restore what was taken from you is seen as "wacko".

  • What is important is that society sees that there are a LOT of men who are so completely dissatisfied about what was done to them that they would go to great lengths to restore.

    THEN maybe parents would THINK about their son's Human Rights in their decision process.

  • Excellent video. The more men see and understand what was robbed from them with infant circumcision and the more they see what is possible with restoration the closer we get to a society that protects children from this barbaric from of child abuse.

    Wayne Griffiths has made tremendous contributions to our understanding of this issue.

  • Male genital mutilation in the name of religion. How completely ghastly and barbaric! This is nothing more than pedophelia and must be outlawed at any cost. Pedophelic voyeurism! Let's see what this baby's dick looks like if we mutilate it!! Wow, look at that!

    Fucking sick religious cunce!

    Circumcision! Just because a baby's nervous system isn't developed enough to express agony, doesn't mean a male baby doesn't feel indescribable agony at having the end of it's dick chopped off.

  • well it dosent harm the human body or sexaul organs or pleasure so its not that bad

  • I take it you're cut? If so, then how would you know how it feels to have an unmutilated penis? Not being rude and whatnot, but seriously... I'm uncut and I could never see a reason for cutting off an important part of the penis. Meh, to each his own, then again, someone else is deciding for those poor souls.

  • actuly im uncut.... There is no reason to cut it off however it does no harm so thers nothing wrong with it. Infact some people say it feels better but i dont know

  • Did you read what you just wrote?! Are you serious? Of course it harms, they butcher off the skin!

  • ...... i giv up ur too retarded

  • You shouldn't give up so easily, my friend. The point is that of course it does harm - the foreskin is there to protect the 'head' and in itself is one of the most sensitive parts of the penis. Cutting off that part of the penis is exactly the same thing as if the labia majora of vagina was cut off. Now woudl that make any sense to you? It's there for a reason. Leave it alone!

  • @silverton64

    I am.

    Didnt hurt me(too young)

    I also have lessened my chance of some specific types of disease too. A foreskin is to keep the head of your penis clean. Humans have evolved to a point where the foreskin is about as useful as our appendix.

  • The human prepuce has an evolutionary advancement over the prepuce of other primates. This is most clearly seen in the evolutionary increase in corpuscular innervation of the human prepuce and the concomitant decrease in corpuscular receptors of the human glans relative to the innervation of the prepuce and glans of lower primate.

    Nadler RD. Proximate and ultimate influences on the regulation of mating in the great apes. Am J Primatol 1995;37:93-102.

  • The foreskin has quite a lot of receptors for pleasure, not to mention protecting a lot of them on the head of the penis. Losing the foreskin greatly diminishes sexual gratification in males

    I have a friend who had to have his removed due to medical problems. He was my face to face confirmation for what has already been well documented.

    Not that it's terrible. I mean, you aren't going to die or something. It's like if you cut off the tip of your finger. Just weird, is all.

  • That's your opinion that it's just weird is all. The fact is, it changes your behaviour. It changes the way you fuck. The way you think. Until you really understand what has been done to you, you can't really take control of who you are or who your are becoming. I mean if you think about it, there is a reason your body is designed the way it is..so your body will know what to do when you mate. Once cut, your nature is gone, so it's up to YOU to figure it out. Regarding RIC, am i right?@FuckJoe

  • BJU International 99 (4), 864-869 (British Journal of Urology International,

    Volume 99 Issue 4 Page 864 - April 2007)

    Circumcision removes the most sensitive part of a man's penis. Sorrells and others enlisted 159 men from the San Francisco Bay area, 91 of them circumcised, and conducted touch-sensitivity tests, using instruments that press with calibrated hairs, on 11 or 17 different places on their penises. The men could not see where they were being touched.

  • @freedom0f5peech

    It IS NOT the most sensitive part of the penis.

    Where the hell have u read this shit?

  • BJU International 99 (4), 864-869 (British Journal of Urology International,

    Volume 99 Issue 4 Page 864 - April 2007)

    Circumcision removes the most sensitive part of a man's penis. Sorrells and others enlisted 159 men from the San Francisco Bay area, 91 of them circumcised, and conducted touch-sensitivity tests, using instruments that press with calibrated hairs, on 11 or 17 different places on their penises. The men could not see where they were being touched.

  • @freedom0f5peech

    Ok. Valid enough.I still find it hard to believe.

    I agree , without a foreskin, the head becomes less sensitive on the fact there is nothing to protect it. A bit like the bottom of your feet. Expose them enough, they get "tougher"

    Thanks for the reply all the same.

  • id take the word of som1 who is circumsied and he ses it is exactly the same feeling and iv never herd ne1 who says they lose pleasure so take that garble jarble and stick up som1 who cares ass

  • "Williams & Kapila estimated the incidence of complications at 10%; In the survey by Kim & Pang, 48% reported decreased masturbatory pleasure, 63% reported increased masturbatory difficulty, and 20% reported a worsened sex life after circumcision."

    Williams N, Kapila L. Complications of circumcision. Brit J Surg 80:1231-6.

    Kim D, Pang M. Effect of male circumcision on sexuality. BJU Int 2006 Published on line ahead of print. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06646­.x

  • @Addman711 It harms it but it heals after. You do lose sexual parts though, as there are many many nerves in the foreskin.

  • @Addman711 Live in your IGNORANT BLISS, If it makes you feel better!!

  • John Safran, I can certainly see why this might have been an awkward couple of moments as the 'demonstration' of how to 'use' the restoration devices occurred.

    nevertheless, I do think its really cool how he's willing to explore this issue publicly.. and isn't afraid to admit that he wishes it hadn't happened to him. It really is not easy for a lot of men to even consider thinking about that.

    good luck with your journey.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more