Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5,704)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • When Palin spoke the other day about a certain candidate not being vetted during the last presidential election, she was alluding to herself and this video.

  • @hpcwsd Idiot, you say?

    Sarah Palin gained a Bachelor's Degree in Communications, majoring in Journalism.

    With the degree, she worked jobs as a sportscaster and a sports reporter.

    After having children, she worked with her husband in their own small fishing business.

    She became a member of her local council, and slowly worked her way up to Mayor, to state politician, to state Govenor, to federal politician over a perod of 18 years.

    Sarah Palin is the 53%.

    Don't whine about politicians.

  • So interesting to see her talking calmly, before the nationwide grandstanding began.

  • the great american empire is falling - turn to the blank pages in the history books. soon there be history there as well

  • @pwd3679 America doesn't have an empire you moron

  • The real traitors in America are Sarah Palin, George Bush, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney & the entire Bush administration. Sarah Palin is a SECESSIONIST. She along with her husband were members of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group of radicals who wanted to secede from the USA. So much for all her bullshit claims of loving America. This woman not only pals around with secessionists, SHE IS ONE.

  • @TheMultioscarwinner "Sarah Palin is a SECESSIONIST"

    Our founding fathers were secessionists, you moron.

  • @MillionthUsername so were the confederates.

  • Comment removed

  • I have that same photo at my house. It came with the frame.

  • Who cares what Party Palin belongs to

  • her outfit - straight from the 80's

  • She seems allot more naturall and authentic here. This is the real Sarah Palin i knew and not the polarizing one of today. i miss the old her.

  • @robman907 teabaggin piece of republican goatshit. Go jump off a cliff you dripping bag of fuk

  • Yeah , I guess associations like this and with that batshit crazy Rev. Muthee are off the table for discussion if you ask Palin or any of her sheep fans.

    HYPOCRITES!!!!

  • Palin totally Un-American

  • my mistake..click off thison my mistake..U woman are a waste of time

  • Failin Pailin DID say that Obamas past associations were fair game ... a little tit for tat.

  • Alaska should become an independent nation being the collapse of America is a foregone conclusion. Alaska and its people should not have to suffer through the problems brought on by liberals and their third World friends who are turning the U.S. into something resembling the Planet of the Apes film series. Good luck to the stupid liberals posting on here who don't seem to know or care about what a fact is. Non White gangs are making our nation unsafe to even step outside the front door.

  • @MrBEB123 Take that Jesus Freak State of Alaska, and while you're at it, take Texas, too! Those two parasite States drain the national treasury with all their subsidies and assistance demands more than the rest of the Union combined.

    It's time to call their bluff! Alaska can suck it!

  • @vinyl45s4ever Actually I made no reference to religion and I don't see that as an issue here. Alaska and Texas as well do seem to have different (and as far as I am concerned better) values than at least some of the major cites in the U.S. and it is about time they go their separate ways. Of course they would take some resources along with them but I don't think the Homo's in SF deserve any of that good stuff anyway. You can't expect quality people to have to put up with degenerate liberals.

  • @vinyl45s4ever Alaska is one of the states that claim most percentage of "religion: none" out of all the states in the census.

  • Comment removed

  • Does she KNOW? I mean, does this woman KNOW? She has got to KNOW!

    How can a person be so profoundly intellectually inferior and NOT KNOW? If narcissism and delusions are available in liquid form, this woman is drunk on it. Not since Carrie Prejean has anyone been so full of self congratulatory celebration of nothingness (and I am mindful of the Donald, who has recently been exposed as the insane snake oil salesman he is).

    The Palin Band Wagon is full of fruits and nuts. Can we move on soon?

  • @thursdaysrecords Feel free to prove your point.

  • @MrBEB123 I may not be able to prove to a thick-head like you that there is no God, but asking proof that Palin is an idiot seems pretty pathetic, even for YOU!

  • She can see Russia from her back window. Shes too stupid for words.

  • To see a dysfunctional, profoundly flawed white trash family who would embarrass anyone associated with them is bad enough. To have a black family rising from working class beginnings to intellectual heights and eventually live in the White House would be a slap in the fact to any redneck, Christian conservative.

    We progressives can certainly validate your feelings of inadequacy, especially if you are one of the low IQ Tea Baggers. You still have to deal with your denial. That's YOUR problem!

  • I just love it how we are told again and again to stop talking about the reign of terror we all endured under Bush, that his presidency is ancient history, but at the same time we have to listen to how wonderful everything was under Ronald Reagan. Somehow a guy who was the oldest president ever elected and likely had Alzheimer's long before he rode off into the sunset with Nancy, is a hero, but a guy half his age who gave us the best economy in history is off limits for comparisons? HYPOCRITES!

  • Christianity was the exuse for slavery, segregation and every other kind of discrimination.

    Those seeking to expolit and inflict pain on OTHERs do so by claiming to do God's work.

    sorry, I have no use for people who calim to be faithful followers of christ, while acting like they are in love with Satan. Hate is not love, and selfishness is not compassion.

    Born again Christians spend the first half of their lives as pathetic sinners, the other half as shameless haters.

  • @thursdaysrecords

    A lot of African Americans owen indentured servants in the colonial times, and actually the first man to "own" a slave in Virginia was a Black man who was a former "Servant." In those days you could have servants but it was more like a contract and at the end of the contract, the servant was either free or bought his freedom. It wasn't until Anthony Jackson -a black man- petitioned the court and won for the right to have a slave for life, also a black man.

  • @thursdaysrecords

    And don't worry, Christians won't always be around to torture you so. For we know the redemption draws nearer than when we first believed.

  • @hsnider1981 When you FIRST believed? What's THAT?

    Religion is bull shit, and it's definitely an "acquired taste". Enjoy it, and be sure to EAT UP! There are far fewer people interested than you think!

    Keep dreaming! We all die and stay dead. Until then I shall LIVE and be a genuinely good person. You go on in the ways of the assholes a la Polly Preachin' Palin.

    Please forgive us if we occasionally break out in laughter. It comes with the territory of being a Jesus Freak. Tough shit, ey?

  • @thursdaysrecords

    Sadly you are correct, there aren't as many Christians today as there once was. And while I don't doubt that you are a genuinely good person; I do wonder why you seem to be filled with so much hate? You made the correlation that all Christians were slave owners and I wanted to point out that was not true. I don't agree with Palin, I do think she is falsely representing the Christian faith as many people do these days. But why do you hate Christians so much? What happened?

  • @hsnider1981 Not ALL Christians were slave owners, but ALL Slave owners were Christians.

    Not ALL Christians were segregationists, but ALL segregationists were Christians.

    You are throwing me a bone by conceding I'm "probably a genuinely good person", yet insist I MUST be filled with hate when demanding admissions from "Christians" that a lot of evil was committed by them, and still is today.

    I'm sorry you are ashamed of those who gave your group a bad name. At least admit their existence!

  • @thursdaysrecords

    I will admit that some Christians had slaves in those days but you're implying an absolute by saying all Christians were segregationist, this simply is not the case. Through out history there have been instances of segregation. Egypt had slaves who were mostly Jews, and Egyptians were not Christians. When the spanish settled in South America, they made the natives slaves. It's not about religion, it has to do with a civilization being further advanced than another.

  • @thursdaysrecords

    But I'm not saying it was right just that it has less to do with religion than you think. I am sorry that anyone especially Christians had slaves and I do admit they existed just not as an absolute. Segregationists believe in setting people apart, so what about eugenics, which is basically the suppression of one race in favor of another. Margaret Sanger, was a racially hate filled woman and she was an atheist. Today there are many pro eugenics people and they're not christian

  • she is a cumslut ;)

  • In this video, Palin looks like Roseanne auditioning for some hick part in a B-movie.

  • - which is a good thing. Alaska should secede. I'll join them if it gains momentum. You'll see tons of productive people fleeing the hellhole that is the US to move to free market Alaska, with the welfare schlubs staying behind turning the US into a third world country. Pro-freedom means anti-american.

  • She didn't say "God Bless America" because she was part of a secessionist movement when she made this video.

  • Palin is a national embarrassment. It's no wonder nobody takes us seriously anymore.

  • I wish to fuck that here in the U.K we had just one conviction politician;the last one was Thatcher,Left or right i prefer my politics to be based on principline or at the very least offer some hope ,all of which is lacking in Europe, an elite get fat while many of the cities in Northern England are disaster areas.Thirteen years of Liberalism did fuck all about it,you yanks are terrified of Mrs Palin because she threatens to awaken you from your self satisfied stupor,you got the Communist

  • @takenbyfrogs Here in the US we have a great many politicians with conviction: conviction for bribery, conviction for tax evasion, and conviction for abuses committed while in office.

  • Helpful tips for effective argument: 1. Be right. 2. If you don't know you're right, be cautious and become informed. 3. Don't fixate on winning at all costs. 4. Don't keep using bad arguments. 5. Be incisive and examine every part of both positions. 6. Stick to your point, and make your opponent stick to his. 7. Criticize ideas- not people. 8. Invite your opponent to see things your way. 9. Don't lose heart-- because people aren't always reasonable.
  • History speaks for itself when it comes to conservatives and economics.

    EVERY conservative of the past 30 years has lead this country into a recession. EVERY ONE OF THEM

    Reagan - RECESSION

    Bush Sr - RECESSION

    Bush Jr - TWO Recessions, one of them we're still working out of.

    if conservative economics and voodoo economic tax cuts actually worked, why do they cause nothing but recessions?

    historical fact speaks for itself. conservatism is based on failure.

  • @schlummieleinchen Hard to take economical advice from somebody who can't spell "led"

  • Why does Palin want to destroy America?

  • Where is the US flag?

    Where is her US flag pin?

    Where is the mention of Ronald Reagan?

    Where is any mention at all about the United States?

    Where is God Bless America?

  • What a nasty woman!

  • tea-tard.

  • Sarah Palin Is The Best

  • You are a cold-blooded animal killer! You will pay for what you did. You are heartless and disgusting. Do you think you are not better than Al Qaeda?? GO TO HELL!!

  • I thought they loved her cause she was such a patriot who loved America so much? Shows you that stupid people don't get irony or hypocrisy

  • A self sufficient state based on the socialist agenda of extorting money out of big oil.

  • liberals suck

  • @hillrode12 That is an utterly braindead remark, typical for a Palindrone

  • @hillrode12 Anyone who would classify themselves as a particular political affiliation is foolish. One one should agree 100% with any party and if one does then they are to stupid to think for themselves. I recognize that lib and cons have valid cases but if you lean to far to the right or left your doomed, we need a nice balance.

  • @hillrode12 I'm a conservative but I'd rather not vote at all before I vote for a mindless idiot like Sarah Palin. She's not a real conservative. She's a neo-con. A FAKE conservative. Vote for Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich. Fuck all the other crooks in Washington.

  • Hey, why didn't say God Bless America?! I thought that's what "real" Americans do. God, what a hypocritical bitch. She even desecrated the flag by signing it. I thought someone who acts like she's the most patriotic person to ever live would know that. What a fucking idiot

  • @Janetvdl * she

  • hey where is her US flag plan!

  • Hey "influencer" where is the US flag??? Duh once you decided you could make millions you grifting bitvh.

  • please let palin be the next oresident so we can have a white coward in the whitehouse ,to show us all how white people really are

  • @whatchaknow100 She doesn't represent all white people

  • just check out youtube and how these white people from the tea party are making racist remarks toward blacks ,ready to kill anyone talking about this coward palin ,sha had the gall to tell her daughter to do wrong and not care what people say about ,like palin abandoning her own people like she did and not caring ,you coward ,your a freaking coward ,

  • @yaze6972

    yes she is natural... naturally retarded

  • @ryviuz She will be the next president. The first female president. She has more in one toe than lieing Obama has in his whole body. Like it or not no matter how hard the liberal tried to destroy her. She rose above them. Obama would have being crying in the corner if he had to deal with what Palin did. No matter how the media twisted the facts she didn't go away. She is a WOMAN who could take it. The left can't attack her record so they use personal attacks. How many are being paid by Soros.

  • @CarolCumbie What's your delusion about the GOP Conservatives that say she hasn't the grasp to understand world Leadership?

  • @CarolCumbie

    Um....like were you born stupid or did you and Palin study together?

  • @japanowner She's the babysitter of both of Bristol's kids

  • Hello, I think that Sarah PALIN can be the first lady to govern the U.S.A after the muslim-jew-american (wonder black) BHO II, because she is natural, herself, with her identity, she is pride and she respect her political choice in front of peoples, I hope for the next election, and she a pretty woman with her glasses, I like her, thanks, bye.

  • sarah is so hot that i would vote for her twice

  • Dam how much proof does one need tieing her to this AIP sucessionest milita bunch she got legislation passed insureing that these militas couldn't be outlawed, notice theres no reference spoken to the US constitution, nor did she give this sort of speech to Republicans or Democrats , a moron can see shes showing favortism to a treasonest group that she owes political favors to ! LOL

  • Just goes to show, that any IDIOT can be a poltiician ! Most cannot find a REAL job !

  • Is she wearing a rain coat while giving this address?

  • @ztpage Sort of looks like a raincoat, LOL the film crew probably had her to remove the sock hat that was lined with "aluminun foil".............. !

  • did you know - it's a FACT Sarah is a Zionist! do your home work on this matter..you will find the truth.

  • What a bellend.

  • You people are the biggest bunch of misfits I have ever encountered! Sarah Palin makes Dan Quayle sound like Albert Einstein!

  • @fbi10

    ""Fox has made this claim..."

    "they never have. They, Beck, O'reily or Hannity, are political commentators not journalists."

    Bill does have a jounalism degree and claims to be one.

    second, Fox puts those guys on the air, it's part of the programing.

    even the anchors like Megyn Kelly offer commentary and debate / shout down guests.

    also, it seems like 90% of broadcast is "commentators" hence me calling them Fox Editorial.

  • @hipstermi "Bill does have a jounalism degree and claims to be one."

    Yes he has a journalism degree but at fox, he's a political analyst and political commentator.

    "second, Fox puts those guys on the air, it's part of the programing."

    Yes as political commentators

    Beck, for example, has said repeatedly that he isn't a journalist for fox.

  • @fbi10

    "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act?? Part of the stimulus package? It failed"

    First you ask "what's he done" I list the programs

    but this is just a conservative lie again. This program all over my state has repaired a ton of old beat up roads that needed it and given jobs.

    also, U of Mich (one school) alone reported getting $272 million dollars from the act, directly creating 503 jobs (med school ,engineering, etc). Yeah that "science" thing you guys hate.

    MORE than bush did.

  • @hipstermi "First you ask "what's he done" I list the programs"

    A stimulus program, $787 billion, that did nothing. The programs that failed (stimulus).

    "This program all over my state has repaired a ton of old beat up roads that needed it and given jobs."

    Your state of Michigan is shit. It hasn't done anything for unemployment on a state and federal level. Conservatives lie? Economists have said that the stimulus failed, as unemployment has gone up, past the 8 % obama's team promised.

  • cont:

    What happened, according to the economists, was that with the recent minimal improvements would have happened without the stimulus. Spending more money can't stimulate the economy, it just doesn't work that way, and it's just going to be added to our deficit. The "tax breaks" are just going to be followed by having our taxes increased. So no, the stimulus didn't work despite your claim in Michigan. Michigan has the second highest national unemployment rate in the country with 13.1.

  • cont: "MORE than bush did."

    Bush had a similar stimulus package in 08 that...failed as well..."more than bush did" isn't such a good thing in this case.

  • @fbi10

    "What happened, according to the economists, was that with the recent minimal improvements would have happened without the stimulus"

    curious which economists and what is your source?

    "So no, the stimulus didn't work despite your claim in Michigan"

    It's deceptive of you to imply that I said "it worked". I said these policies helped some things, including the research & jobs at the U.

    I never expected things to get right over night either.

  • @hipstermi "It's deceptive of you to imply that I said "it worked"."

    It's what you suggested and what you implied..

    ""American Recovery and Reinvestment Act?? Part of the stimulus package? It failed"

    but this is just a conservative LIE again. This program all over my state has repaired a ton of old beat up roads that needed it and given jobs."

    "I never expected things to get right over night either."

    Me neither but instead its making things worse than better.

  • @fbi10

    More palin opposition to science.

    In 04 Gubatorial debate about schools teaching evolution/ creationism she said:

    "Teach both. You know, don’t be afraid of education. Healthy debate is so important, and it’s so valuable in our schools. I am a proponent of teaching both."

    Why not teach alchemy and chemistry or faeries with biology with that "logic"

  • @hipstermi How do you feel when palin stated that evolution is a scientific fact and it should be taught in schools?

    "Why not teach alchemy and chemistry or faeries with biology with that "logic""

    That's your assumption...

  • @fbi10

    "That's your assumption..."

    You didn't address the point- Palin as a Gov. candidate, was calling for Intelligent Design to be taught in schools with evolution. This means she either believes in Intelligent Design (aka Creationism) or doesnt believe it, and said this to appease conservative voters aka her base.

    The former is more religious belief than science, the later being compromising beliefs, education, & real science for votes. Not good qualities for a leader.

  • @hipstermi "You didn't address the point-"

    Yes i did, LOL! She does believe in creationism but she also believes in evolution. Do you have a problem with that?

    "Not good qualities for a leader."

    LOLa liberal/obama supporter such as yourself is NOT qualified to tell ME what makes a good leader...good luck with your failing stimulus...

  • @fbi10

    "Yes i did, LOL! She does believe in creationism but she also believes in evolution. Do you have a problem with that?"

    Yup.

    Her religious beliefs are 1 thing, saying it should taught in school is another. Proves her religious affiliation does effect her leadership.

    Not only that, but it's more magical powers that science. Ergo- stupid.

    "LOLa liberal/obama supporter such as yourself is NOT qualified to tell ME what makes a good leader"

    right- so you elect the MAGICAL POWERS crowd.

  • @hipstermi "Her religious beliefs are 1 thing, saying it should taught in school is another. Proves her religious affiliation does effect her leadership."

    she's not advocating that her religion should be taught in school and she hasn't pushed for it after she was elected, another theory of yours debunked. Her belief hasnt effected a political choice, not once.

    "right- so you elect the MAGICAL POWERS crowd."

    no i elect ppl who believe in the consitution, unlike you...

  • @fbi10

    "she's not advocating that her religion should be taught in school"

    If you knew anything about "Intelligent" design you would know it's disguised creationism. aka a Judeo Christian take on the origins of life. No basis for that to be taught in a SCIENCE class anymore than teaching Hindu or Buddhist beliefs in science.

    it has nothing to do with science.

    so is she dumb enough to believe that shit or just saying that to appease her "base"?

  • @hipstermi "so is she dumb enough to believe that shit or just saying that to appease her "base"?

    she believes in creationlism but again you didnt address the point...shes not advocating for it to be taught in school. and again...you didnt answer my question

  • @fbi10

    ""so is she dumb enough to believe that shit or just saying that to appease her "base"?

    "she believes in creationlism"

    Which proves my point...she's dumb.

    Dumber for wanting that taught in conjunction with science.

    "shes not advocating for it to be taught in school"

    Her saying "teach them both" is not advocating for it to be taught...how exactly?

  • @hipstermi Nô thats opinion and youre changing topics from politics to religion. I am not interested in that but we are discussing political policies here. Religion/faith is something personal that u havé nô right to judge ppl on, specially when someone like palin never forced it on anyone. You can talk about your hatred on religion to some1 else.

    Well shes not advocating it because she never forced that view on anyone dispite her personal belief that it would make a good debate.

  • @fbi10

    Odd...

    I just saw a video where former Alaskan Independence Party chair Mark Chyrson said Sarah was a "friend" of his...and he she had an open door policy to him for political actions at city hall. Claimed she worked on the party. Said Sarah wasn't a member...but a friend...working together...TIES!

    This even meets your criteria of "friend"...so TIES! TIES!

  • indeed that you don't talk about this man but just take quotes out of context

    "Dexter Clark, husband of Lynette and a vice chairman of the Alaska Independence Party, said that when his wife told reporters that Palin had been an AIP member she was "acting on information from Mark Chryson,"

    same story:

    "Chyrson said he did not remember seeing Sarah Palin at the 1994 convention: "I don't, no. I was working behind the scenes. Back then I was only vaguely familiar with her."

  • cont:

    "He added that Sarah Palin did not play "an active role in the party" or to speak out for its causes."

    Debunked this "tie" claim again. She was mayor/governor with an open door policy for everyone. It wasn't hard for anyone to reach her. She wanted to hear what the people had to say to see what she can do better. From your source, Chryson has already lied in the past about Palin, and all already been debunked.

    still can't give me a reason why i should have voted for Obama?

  • @fbi10

    "still can't give me a reason why i should have voted for Obama?"

    I gave you several (after you failed to give me a non Obama based reason to vote for Palin.)

    Palin has TIES! to the AIP!

    TIES!

  • @hipstermi LOL !!!! Oh yes i did. Apparently you cant read. I said: "AGIA License bill signed August 27, 2008, Energy Package signed August 25, 2008.,Administrative Order 242 signed August 20, 2008, Governor Palin saved her state nearly $1 billion through budget cuts and use of stimulus funds and $913,000 on her own expenses for a total of $1.09 billion, general executive accomplishment Chairperson of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, want more?"

    U didnt give me reasons y i shoul

  • Cont: why i should havé. U dodged thé question proving that u havé known that youre a drone. If u cant give me 1 political reason y i should have, thats sad, u coward LOL

    I just debunked your Whole tie thing LOL you failed again. You failed in your whole argument.

  • @fbi10

    I pointed to a video of Chryson being interviewed. First hand account that differd from your second hand article. It proves his TIES!

    I didnt dodge the question. I answered it before on what I liked about Obama. You then tried to change the story around and never admitted to such.

    You still ahvent disproven TIES! as we have Chryson on tape calling Sarah FAILin a friend and how they worked together....nor did you give a good reason to vote for FAILin.

    ergo...you failed

  • @hipstermi "I pointed to a video of Chryson being interviewed. First hand account that differd from your second hand article. It proves his TIES!"

    Then I have a quote from the same person, by CBS, interviewing Chryson, and he stated that "He added that Sarah Palin did not play "an active role in the party" or to speak out for its causes."

    Again, your claim is debunked LOL!

    No, you dodged the question. Let's look back at what i asked shall we...

    ""What has he accomplished political

  • cont:

    "...in Chicago or in the white house that he deserves a reelection?" in a post a day ago when i asked why i should have voted for obama or should i in the future. I clearly just asked you to state something before/prior to his presidency when he was in chicago..."

    Now please state how i changed my so called "story"?I thought for an idiotic drone such as yourself, you would be proud to state why you voted for Obama,i guess you regret it now because he hasn't done shit for homosexuals...

  • @fbi10

    "please state how i changed my so called "story"?I

    Monky, I did this several times.

    You asked why should anyone vote for Obama. When I listed accomplishments, mostly in the White House, you changed your story and them lied and said you request PRE Presidential accomplishments.

    My quotes and your own posts that's not what you asked more, but you lied and said it was.

    the question- since I already explained this a few times why ask again? that repetative monkey behavior of yours.

  • @hipstermi "You asked why should anyone vote for Obama. When I listed accomplishments, mostly in the White House, you changed your story and them lied and said you request PRE Presidential accomplishments."

    No i asked why should I, me, vote for obama, not anyone. You listed things he tried to do, not even accomplishments except 2, that were all in his presidency. My own quote disproves your accusation that i changed my story, where i clearly didnt. I didnt say i requested pre presidential only

  • @fbi10

    "i guess you regret it now because he hasn't done shit for homosexuals..."

    you "forgot" Matthew Shepard Act finally getting through.

    One judges a President based on his whole term. no Pres. accomplished all in the first 2 years. I adit I wish he was further on some issues...but conservative hate mongers have killed the end of DODT

    are you proud of your party? they support kicking out brave service men and are letting the military go through emails to find them.

  • @hipstermi "Matthew Shepard Act"

    i did forget about that, and i am glad this was pushed through.

    "but conservative hate mongers have killed the end of DODT"

    its called dont ask dont tell...they dont ask, YOU dont tell...

    "are you proud of your party? they support kicking out brave service men"

    no they dont..i sure as hell dont support that. But dont give me that crap that the right is evil, and the left is good. thats weak.

    majority of hate mongers are on the left...

  • @fbi10

    "its called dont ask dont tell...they dont ask, YOU dont tell..."

    I'd be pissed if I was told at work to never mention my wife or life at home.

    On top of that...military is going through emails despite McCain's claims it's not happening.

    "majority of hate mongers are on the left..."

    Not really. You guys openly hate gays and seek to pass laws against marriage. You make military life hard on them. The worst racial problems have and still existed in the SOUTH...the RED states.

  • @hipstermi "Not really. You guys openly hate gays and seek to pass laws against marriage. You make military life hard on them. The worst racial problems have and still existed in the SOUTH...the RED states."

    Conservatives don't hate gays...where did you get that crap from?? On the marriage issue, you are trying to force religious institutions to marry Gays/Lesbians when gay relations (at least to Christianity and Islam) are against their beliefs. You have civil unions, which i am for

  • cont: and you have california now, ignoring the vote of people, over throwing the gay marriage ban. Now, military life hard for them? Excuse me but it was Bill Clinton who signed DADT in 93 with a democratic majority....don't give me that bullshit we try to make life hard for them. Racial problems?? The south have been, during slavery times and after,liberal. Liberals started the KKK, started the secession that caused the CW, voted historically against Civil rights act (before LBJ again)

  • @fbi10

    "cont: and you have california now, ignoring the vote of people, over throwing the gay marriage ban"

    THat's how rulings on the law and civil rights work. I'm sick of you conservatives "pretending not to get it".

    Loving V. Virginia- the "majority" of that state was fine with ban on interracial marriage. If judges up to the Sup. Court hadn't ruled Loving's marriage would have been ILLEGAL.

    If the "majority"of a state said Jews couldnt marry Christians you would be ok with that?

  • @hipstermi "THat's how rulings on the law and civil rights work. I'm sick of you conservatives "pretending not to get it"."

    Walker had no right to do that...learn a little: There is not currently any guarantee of same-gender marriage in the California Constitution and specifically provides for amendment by majority vote, so therefore, majority vote is actually a "constitutional right" but same gender marriage is not. The judges clearly violated it's own constitution, 4 ppl decided for a state.

  • cont: "Loving V. Virginia- the "majority" of that state was fine with ban on interracial marriage. If judges up to the Sup. Court hadn't ruled Loving's marriage would have been ILLEGAL."

    It's not the same thing. This was clearly a violation of the Constitution in Cali.

    "If the "majority"of a state said Jews couldnt marry Christians you would be ok with that?"

    No i wouldn't be ok with that but it's not the same thing. Since prop 22, this has been going on.

  • @hipstermi "Explain how you as "guy on internet" somehow "knows more" than the Cali Supreme Court? They stated this was under "marrying the person of choice""

    I already answered this. "There is not currently any guarantee of same-gender marriage in the California Constitution and specifically provides for amendment by majority vote, so therefore, majority vote is actually a "constitutional right" but same gender marriage is not."

  • @fbi10

    "There is not currently any guarantee of same-gender marriage"

    You conservative one sided again. There is not a prohibitation either.

    "provides for amendment by majority vote"

    Not for everything. For example, if the "majority" said blacks sit in the back of the bus or jews can't vote...FEDERAL courts would overturn that.

    AND...Federal courts have overturned state laws, as we saw in Loving Vs Virginia. (Notice how Virginia was/ is a conservative Christian state ...)

  • @hipstermi "You conservative one sided again. There is not a prohibitation either."

    The decision was made by the people, it's that simple. ONE judge can't force this over rule. According to the State supreme court SF judge, his decision was based on the 14 amendment....there's NOTHING in the 14th that JUSTIFIES his ACTIONS, LOL!!! According to the Constitution only the Supreme Court can hear cases involving States.....not the federal court system.

    Loving Vs Virginia was the supreme court.

  • @fbi10

    "Loving Vs Virginia was the supreme court."

    You really don't know anything about history.

    The Sup. Court OVERTURNED the state laws and courts...AND the "majority" of those southern conservative Christians who wanted taht law to stay the same.

  • @hipstermi

    "The Sup. Court OVERTURNED the state laws and court"

    Yes, they overturned Pace v. Alabama, which they can saying it was "unconstitutional".

    "AND...Federal courts have overturned state laws, as we saw in Loving Vs Virginia. "

    According to the Constitution only the Supreme Court can hear cases involving States.....not the federal court system...or a state supreme court, this is a case for the highest court in the US. A small town riverside judge can't make a decision like this...

  • @fbi10

    "The decision was made by the people, it's that simple."

    No, YOU are that simple. You didn't answer my points- if the "majority" of a state votes and says blacks ride in the back of the bus or Jews can't marry Christians...you really don't see that being overturned by a higher court?

    and why have you avodied answering this?

  • @hipstermi "if the "majority" of a state votes and says blacks ride in the back of the bus or Jews can't marry Christians...you really don't see that being overturned by a higher court?"

    By the supreme court. This is a constitutional issue. The judges decision based on the 14th amendment is false. This can't be decided by a federal judge in San Fransisco

  • @fbi10

    "By the supreme court. This is a constitutional issue. The judges decision based on the 14th amendment is false. "

    You're doing it again- being vague without an explanation.

    You didnt explain how you think you "know more" than the judges, and instead of explaining your POV, all you say is "it's false".

    "This can't be decided by a federal judge in San Fransisco "

    conservative vague yet again...

  • @hipstermi "You didnt explain how you think you "know more" than the judges, and instead of explaining your POV, all you say is "it's false"."

    I explained it already, swamp insect LOL!

    It's the supreme court to decide not a federal judge..and based on the judges decision, the 14th amendment doesn't "protect" this sort of sexual conduct, which is what the liberal judges like this one basis on gay marriage.

  • @hipstermi "No you didn't. You gave YOUR take on the Cali. Const. But thats an opinion not fact. What I asked was...how do you as a guy with no law degree (or who I don't thikn even lives in Cali.) imply you "know more" than the Cali Supreme Court judges?"

    It's not opinion you idiot, look it up LOL! If i live or don't live in california, that's known of your business or concern. Again, look it up...look up the 14th amendment, look up the history of this issue in California.

  • cont:

    Now, and i think you would agree, if the people actually voted FOR this...I wouldnt have a problem but they didn't.

  • @fbi10

    The point you avoided-

    You claim gay is a "choice." For sake of argument, lets go with that:

    - RELIGION is a choice...so yet inter faith couples can marry. AND a church can turn them down. so:

    1. The state can't say "I won't marry this woman who chose Judism to her man who chose Islam..." but a Rabbi CAN say this.

    2. The Synagogue also doesn't loose "tax exempt" bullshit straw man you mentioned.

    You have repeatedly avoided both these points.

  • @hipstermi "You claim gay is a "choice." For sake of argument, lets go with that:"

    I claim sexual preference is a choice, referee back to my earlier posts, not sexual orientation because SO hasn't been proven to be a "choice" or "natural".

  • @fbi10

    "I claim sexual preference is a choice"

    The points you failed to address:

    - RELIGION is a choice...so yet inter faith couples can marry. AND a church can turn them down. so:

    1. The state can't say "I won't marry this woman who chose Judism to her man who chose Islam..." but a Rabbi CAN say this.

    2. The Synagogue also doesn't loose "tax exempt" bullshit straw man you mentioned.

    You have repeatedly avoided both these points, including your last answer.

  • @hipstermi

    It depends what church, etc...example(i'll use your Judaism example)  Orthodox Judaism don't accept inter faith couples but Reform Judaism do.

    1. yes i agree.

    2. What happened in New Jersey, where a lesbian couple wanted a to use a Christian ministry for their civil union ceremonies, the church declined, the lesbian couple filed a complaint (discrimination) and the state stripped their TE.

    Answer my Bill Clinton question, quit avoiding it like a little child.

  • @fbi10

    "2. What happened in New Jersey, where a lesbian couple wanted a to use a Christian ministry"

    You're being deceptive. The issue was a public PAVILION not the "ministry".

    Google Harriet Bernstein & Luisa Paster. NPR web page 6-16-08 proves you wrong. There was no "ministry" issue at all. Why did you lie?

  • @hipstermi "A ministry associated with the United Methodist Church is suing New Jersey officials who threatened to prosecute the ministry for refusing to allow a same-sex civil union ceremony in one of its worship facilities." It wasn't a "public" pavilion, it was their facility...why are you lying?

  • @fbi10

    "ministry for refusing to allow a same-sex civil union ceremony in one of its worship facilities." It wasn't a "public" pavilion, it was their facility"

    YOU CHANGED YOUR STORY:

    first you claimed it was about "the ministry" and after I PROVED YOU WRONG with a cited story, corrected you it was about the pavilion, you are trying to nitpick to say "facilities"..which the pavilion is part of. Then you pretend its not.

    I cited names & news story...your intellectual laziness could not.

  • @hipstermi "YOU CHANGED YOUR STORY"

    No i didn't, it is the same story you fucking idiot LOL!!!

    It's a Christian ministry, you idiot. "A ministry associated with the United Methodist Church " The fuck does that say?? HAHAHA, you didn't prove anything...yes you cited names and i proved you wrong with one line from an article...you failed LOL!

  • @fbi10

    ""A ministry associated with the United Methodist Church " The fuck does that say??"

    It says you cut a sentence in half and dont have much reading comprehension skills! It also says you dont know how to cite a story....you know, like I did.

    You failed on this.

    "HAHAHA"

  • @fbi10

    "It depends what church, etc...example(i'll use your Judaism example) Orthodox Judaism don't accept inter faith couples but Reform Judaism do."

    way to repeat what I stated...you avoided the point, Churches can refuse couples now...HOW does this change under gays?

    "Answer my Bill Clinton question, quit avoiding it like a little child"

    1. dont order me around, asshole

    2. I very clearly said I did not remember your question, so I asked you repeat it.

  • @hipstermi

    "HOW does this change under gays?"

    Well, the way you just stated the question, Christian churches don't believe homosexuality is natural and also a sin (according to Christianity), so being "gay" does change things. Again, give me a study that proves that it is natural....you still haven't done it.

    1. You act like a bitch coward, i am going to treat you like one...don't ditch out what you can't take, chicken shit.

    2. I CLEARLY stated my question again, u re avoiding it, coward