Very good! 5*s.
Yes, using real planes would leave too many clues. No plane wreck has ever occurred that couldn't be at least 75% reconstructed by the debris.
I suspect that since so many eyes were on the towers after the first explosion, there had to be a fly-by on WTC2 to plant the image in the brains.
So, here's an interesting bit of film, starting @2:12
watch?v=xio5tYgrvS0
And then, substantial evidence that AU175 later landed unscathed
watch?v=AjRS-gRyLTo
nameofthepen 2 years ago 4
@nameofthepen Hey, I was gonna say that!!!
Fine job either way and 5+ on the video!
4ezMoney 1 year ago
5 * * * * *
nomangodoytokay 2 years ago 3
Very good! 5*s.
Yes, using real planes would leave too many clues. No plane wreck has ever occurred that couldn't be at least 75% reconstructed by the debris.
I suspect that since so many eyes were on the towers after the first explosion, there had to be a fly-by on WTC2 to plant the image in the brains.
So, here's an interesting bit of film, starting @2:12
watch?v=xio5tYgrvS0
And then, substantial evidence that AU175 later landed unscathed
watch?v=AjRS-gRyLTo
nameofthepen 2 years ago 4
@nameofthepen Hey, I was gonna say that!!!
Fine job either way and 5+ on the video!
4ezMoney 1 year ago
5 * * * * *
nomangodoytokay 2 years ago 3