Added: 1 year ago
From: daddariostrings
Views: 5,734
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (18)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Honestly... I prefer the guitar without the O-Port; much more natural... NATURAL, its important.

  • seriously. if you put about2-3 cups of pebbles in your guitar it adds natural reverb reflection. You can carefully move them around to suit your guitar and then record with a new sound. People who don't have easy access to quality rocks can still simulate the effect by shifting to a different tonal position with their right hand.

  • what´s up with the drinking? LMAO and the fat chick playing the guitar is weird... so bizarre... XD

  • I'm sorry but I think it makes expensive guitars sound worse..it took that rich bassy sound out. :(

  • @smgman13 or it could be you guys CHANGED THE TUNING and there is less bass with a higher pitched tuning. epic fail

  • oh i see! it makes the tuning a half step higher!

    -_-

    WHAT THE HELL PEOPLE JUST GIVE US A DEMO OF BEFORE AND AFTER ON THE SAME GUITAR, THE SAME TUNING, THE SAME STRINGS!!! GOSH!

  • Thats stupid.... Obviously the first take sounds a little muddy and lacking because its in a lower tuning. E-standard naturally sounds brighter because strings are usually gauged perfectly to sound best in that tuning. Also, I don't hear much of a tone difference. If the bass is boosted, who cares? Usually a lot of the bass from acoustic guitar is cut from the mix for the sake of other instruments.

  • there probably so drunk from the wine, that they cant even tell.

  • Better without it.  The O-port strips the guitar of its character. And of course endorsers of this product thinks its a "winner." The loser here is guitar makers. A Gibson guitar does not sound good enough without a round funnel shaped peice of plastic. Give me a break!

  • Didn't help that the 'without' part guitar's tuned down a semi-tone, whereas the "with" it's at concert pitch. Perhaps they should've held off the plonk till they'd done.

    IMHO it sounded warmer/richer without the O-Port, a bit cleaner/clearer with it fitted - I preferred without.

    I have one in my Gibson 'Roy Smeck' (mainly to help deal with feedback & protect edge of the soundhole). It gives a deeper/tighter bass, not too bright. Mine sounds better with the O-port. Very glad I tried one.

  • Will this thing work on a nylon string?

  • @AbrahamVanHasselhoff - I play classical guitar, and I see no videos posted of anyone trying an o-port in one. So, I ordered one and I will be posting my own video soon. I'll try it both on my Ramirez and Cordoba.

  •  I have an O-Port in my Jasmine s34c but I liked your guitar WITHOUT the O-Port better. I may take mine out and listen to it again. I forgot what it sounds like without it. It may totally depend on the guitar it's installed in.

  • 0:37 and 1:18 if you wanna fast reference

  • Sounds Better Without!

  • It sounds more clean but it sounds less natural and almost muffled to me. No better or worse, just different.

  • Do you want demented guitar fools heaping abuse on your heads because you know that they will do it?.....J200 indeed!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more