Added: 4 years ago
From: TheHour
Views: 151,734
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,459)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nickleback. AAAH! AAAAAGHHHH *punches monitor*

  • There are no final solutions , there is no absolute truth, there is no supreme leader, there is no totalitarian solution, that says that if you will just give up your freedom of inquiry, if you simply abandon your critical faculties, the world of idiotic bliss can be yours. You may lose the faculties, you may not know as a result, that the idiotic bliss is even more idiotic than it looks.

  • God is not great :-).

  • Hitchens at 1:48 "Only in the last 6000 years of this existence [of humankind] does Heaven suddenly decide to intervene." Uh, want to rethink that? God began "intervening" with humankind soon after creating the first human beings in the Garden of Eden. And despite how often and how far human beings have wandered away from Him, He hasn't quit since.

  • @tamething1 humans have been around for 60000 to 180000 years get the garbage out of you ears and rethink you last stupid comment!

  • @MrDasmaster Don't waste your time. It's impossible to have a rational discussion with someone like him. Tamething has decided that his interpretation of a set of ancient texts written by nomadic tribes a few thousand years ago is a better way to understand the world than reason and evidence. We can't do anything to persuade people like that. We can try to persuade those whose minds work properly; and we can fight the religious when their beliefs cause harm.

  • wow, in 5 minutes we get to see the highs and lows of human society--Christopher Hitchens followed immediately by nickelback.

  • I actually like this interviewer, seems like one of the less stupid people Hitchens was questioned by.

  • NICKELBACK.... REALLY?

  • What a great thinker and talker, who will take up the baton now.

  • @Holmseyd You, me and everybody else. I hope.

  • Mr. Hitchens hits the nail on the head at 2:20 and beyond of this video! I miss his wisdom!

  • @MrCinder82 Wisdom? Christopher Hitchens did not know Christianity at all. Even his brother, who loved him, said this in his book "The Rage Against God: How Atheism Led Me to Faith."

  • How the fuck do you follow up Chris Hitchens with Nickelback??? Fucking thing sucks

  • As much as I agree with Christopher, and Richard Dawkins for that matter, I do believe they may go about in an unwise way – you cannot (in my view) alter people’s fait and feelings with reason and logic. A Christian is – as put by Dawkins – delusional. You cannot tell a delusional person to change his way using logic. The approach must be to teach the young, educate the young, guide the young, open the eyes of the young, and let the older generations die out.

  • @MrsAlrightyThen Well said!

  • @MrsAlrightyThen Absolutely agree with you. But what about the fanatics and the potential danger there? I like what you are saying, though.

  • @MrsAlrightyThen that's one way of looking at it. Though, some of us break the chain through not enough delusion growing up, or subjection to openmindedness. I will be looking for those people, and when I see children I want to say so badly, "hey little buddy, god does not exist" and then continue walking. But I am afraid of their parents :)

  • Wouldn't it be funny if Mr. Hitchens says he's actually a man of faith.

  • @shaunrwilliams It's funny when anyone says it.

  • @csnowutube Lol good one.

  • @csnowutube lol i've studied his movements and speach, it seems Mr. Hitchens had a wonderful heart.

    He also seemed not to stray from the truth.

    It's nice when a persons yes is yes and their no is no, anything greater or lesser is evil.

  • @shaunrwilliams

    Let your yes be yes ....

    One of my favorite guides. thanks.

  • @shaunrwilliams no. That wouldn't be funny. That would be incredibly stupid and contradictory to everything he stands for. If anything, theists would outright lie about him admitting this before his death as a means to slander him.

  • @mttellek Agreed. Mr. Hitchens said more than once that he hoped there would be a recorder running to capture his last moments.

  • @mttellek

    If you listen closely to his whole debates, you will hear him say that he is not saying Heaven and God do not exist, repeatedly, in fact in his book he is convinced 6.9 out of 7 that their is no God, but he's not 100% convinced that there isn't.

    -TruthorDeath

  • @shaunrwilliams No doubt someone will claim that Hitchens had a last second epiphany and recanted all that he believed. Whoever says that will be a liar. It was said about Darwin, too. The woman who claimed that about Darwin said she had heard him, but Darwin's daughter, who actually WAS with her father when he died said the woman was not there and mad it up. It's a shame, but not an uncommon occurrence, that Christians will lie to support their beliefs.

  • Fuck i hate nickelback

  • IT IS NOT BLACK AND WHITE. Religious is the tool for brainwashing yes,but propaganda brainwashes those who trust in man alone for education !!! THIS IS HOW YOU CREATE

    DIVIDE BETWEEN HUMAN BEINGS. WE ARE ALL BEING PLAYED IF WE DONT STOP FIGHTING

  • @pwarren1010 WE JUST GOTTA KEEP OUR COMPOSURE! KEEP OUR COMPOSURE!

  • Hitchens is wrong about hereditary leadership. The leadership was where the Sunni and Shia divide came from. The Sunnis who are 85% wanted a qualified person to lead the state and the Shia wanted a hereditary leadership..

    None of the Caliphates in the Ottoman empire were descendant of the Prophet.

  • @Xzibillionaire

    so he's right. islam is a hereditary leadership and the Sunnis wanted out.

  • @myrelative

    No you idiot. Sunnis didn't want out, they are the fucking majority(85%). The Shias wanted out since they are the minority. Hitchens is wrong about the hereditary leadership. Infact the monarchy in Saudi Arabia is completely against Islamic law.

  • @Xzibillionaire

    shunnis are the majority NOW.

    and WTF is a "qualified person" to lead islam

  • You heard the man, keep it to yourself Christians and other religious fundamentalists. Christians out of north American political life now!

  • Why was mankind living in caves 50, 000 years ago and not flying around in helicopters? Because he had to evolve into an intelligent mammal first.

  • Fucking Nickelback...

  • I think Socrates said it best

    "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?"

    Where pious and moral behaviour are interchangable. Affirming one side leads to morals pertaining to but not being inseprable from religion, and affirming the other leads to a contradiction of beliefs (God is no longer absolute, which contradicts his definition/essense/existence).

  • @aTerranWraith Must try harder: F-

  • Comment removed

  • I too am unsettled with the hypocrisy in religion or in the church but welcome to being human because everyone has made conscious hypocritical decisions. I am not saying pass over blatant wrong done by religious people but I think there needs to be room left for imperfections for everyone. and yes there have been countless BAD examples of people who PROFESS to be followers of Jesus...but don't lump us all together

  • @navarrodragon25 Don`t forget the cover-ups, subterfuge, misinformation, and a propaganda machine that rivals Goebbel`s system. I`m talking about evolutionist scientists and the packaging and presenting of this asinine theory to the `hungry masses`.

  • I can generally expect people, who are not "poorly evovled mammals" but rather fallen humanity with a sin nature, to attack God or followers of Christ. But what gets me is these people who act like they are so smart but make huge generalizations and make stupid unfounded assertions. I agree that mere religion is foolish even as Jesus would agree BUT what about those who actually follow what the bible says have a real love for Jesus...there is a difference.

  • @navarrodragon25 Do you stone to death your children when they are bad? Would you stone to death your wife on her fathers doorstep if you found that she was not a virgin on your wedding night? If not, then you don’t follow what the Bible teaches. Do you only do good things because you want heavenly reward or you fear a celestial punishment? Morality doesn’t come from religion it precedes it.

  • @bobmedic3214 read the LAW(stoning) in context.The old testament LAW ( part of God's old covenant) could never be fulfilled by us so out of Love this HOLY God made a way for His Sinful people by sending Jesus to take the punishment we deserved and granting us GRACE in the new covenant. That means no more stoning. I do good things out of a positive/ healthy Fear that has grown into and is not seperable from LOVE for Him. My good deeds are NOT earning Heaven merely a response to His sacrifice

  • @bobmedic3214 I am not religious but I have read the bible.The bible documents these primitive forms of mans law sure,but mans law is limited to mans limitations.Look how we have evolved since.Still along way to go I say. Lets dig up dirt for the pagans next.

    .

  • @bobmedic3214 Hey, don't mock that. Weapons were scarce back then! If your child misbehaved it was a choice between stoning them to death or throwing sand in their face.

  • @bobmedic3214 You have skipped over God's commands to refrain from murder, to do unto others as you would have them do unto you, to love your neighbour as yourself... in favour of slander against God - out of context, twisted, and vile. God DIED for you - for us all - in order to put sin to death. Would you do the same?

    VenomFangX does well at putting things into context in his YouTube video "Old Testament Slavery, Stoning, & Seafood."

  • His own comments :

    2:40 in part 1 "well that's insulting to you or to me and to actually everyone in this room,the thought that we couldn't do the RIGHT thing ... we know how to do the right thing,thanks, without being blackmailed in that way.."

    VS.

    4:46 in part 2 "it's latent in us because we are a poorly evolved mammal species and we are subject to these delusions "

    well which on is it? either we know and are capable or we can't! "poorly evolved mammal"!? isn't THAT insulting?

  • @navarrodragon25 What an arrogant twit to make sweeping , absolute asinine statements like that (of course I mean Mr. Hitch)

  • @navarrodragon25 1) He means it as it could be considered as an(unintentional) insult from Religion thinking that people don't know how to do the right thing, 2) He is actually being modest by including himself when saying we're poorly evolved mammals AND "poorly" is relative, that is, IM SURE he knows that human kind is extremely intelligent specie but he's just "looking down" for the not so bright episodes human kind also has which makes it potential "evolution material".

  • RIP HITCH 

  • @StreetStylerZ07 RIP is a religious expression, he`d be insulted. Something more atheistic/evolutionary more appropriate, like...

  • @comanche66100 He would NOT be insulted. He's intelligent enough to know what was meant if someone said RIP. It is, after all, meant in good nature.

  • @kiriakoz He IS insulted. I was able to `channel`him on my I phone as he was in the waiting line in Buddhist Hell (Entrance Office)

  • Finally , a Hitchens interview that doesnt just spend its time putting the man (genius) down

  • @StarMangledAstronaut no one has ever put hitch down he destroys them!

  • @SmackNcrack01 Now he`s destroyed.

  • @comanche66100 just like u and i one day ... i hope like him i lived a life worth livin which judging from ur comment u wont have x

  • @SmackNcrack01 Learn how to spell correctly first...

  • @comanche66100 great comeback......snooze

  • @SmackNcrack01 Yeah man!

  • Evolution is just a theory. Just like gravity, the shape of the earth, that we revolve around the sun...

  • @JeremiahCrow Gravity is theory proven by facts while Religous theory is just a "theory" which ha no evidence what so ever.

  • @JeremiahCrow do you know what exatly is evolution, well i can tell you because i do and i know i am right, evolution is basically species which habe been descendant form their ancestors which proves that humans where no created out of nothing. Now ofc you can point out that in that case "who created first beings on earth and so on" but the my point is, evolution and gravity is fact which has been prover to be utterly correct.

  • @JeremiahCrow And what makes you think hat we do not revolve around the sun?? so in that case you think sun revolves around the earth?? hahah kinda silly point, also if we do not revolve around the sun and be either in aphelion or perihelion it means either entire year it's winter or summer.

    Pardon for my English, i know im not explain everything the way you would like but my overall point was, you are wrong about theory just being theory because Scietific theory is a fact which

  • @Mindaugas7100 I don't understand. I assume english is not your first language, so I suspect you did not pick up on my sarcasm. I support evolution. In fact, to people who call it a theory, I usually point out that it is fact. It was in jest.

  • @JeremiahCrow Ahhh, there we go it was sarcasm then i totally understand what you meant, never mind.

  • @JeremiahCrow (continue) is proven and cannot be wrong. It's like saying 2x2 is 5 because of the possible theory "when you mutiple number by itself you add 1 in the end" ofc this theory is pathetic and retarted but it's a simple example to prove that the theories you said aren't proven are TRULY proven to be true.

  • Religion is like a penis, perfectly fine to play around with in your own company, but by god, don't get it out in public, and certainly don't attempt to shove your penis down my childrens throat lmao.

  • @NICH0LASM Oh boy, vulgar too. `My childrens throat`? What kind of a perverted mind comes out with something like that.

    You are one `under developed primate sicko`!

    I believe all your evolution buddies on this site will agree with me100% here.

    Show your statement to your wife or girlfriend see how they react.

    Signing off protoplasm.

    A debased amoeba like you I want nothing to do with.

  • @comanche66100 They would agree with me. The way to get religious people into a frothing at the mouth fluster is to hit them with something likely to enrage them. Why else do you think Richard Dawkins uses the word poison and religion in the same sentence frequently. If you want to believe in pixies and fairys by all means go ahead, but leave children out of it. Signing off, defender of reason... lol.

  • Would't it be lovely if you could just push the delete button and remove all the people who worhip these different gods from society.

  • @NICH0LASM Better a button for removing evo-lunatic-ists.

  • @comanche66100 You are another one who brings disgrace to the intelligence of the human race. Evolution is proven fact now. None of the religions, big or small, have any proof.

  • @NICH0LASM Evolution is proven fact now? What a LIE!  Why do they still refer to it as a theory? Because that is what it IS and ALWAYS will be.

    You are an imbecile.

  • @comanche66100 Gravity is also a theory. You haven't even looked up what the word means in science do you?

  • @Hirnlego999 The LAW of Gravity Idiot. Shorter Oxford Dictionary; theory=An UNSUBSTANTIATED hypothesis; speculatieve, FANCIFUL.

    My definition of you: an evolutionary lemming following the `asses`of other lemmings and we all know where masses of lemmings wind up.

  • @comanche66100 Actually no, it's still a theory, it just has that name. When Newton came up with it was a theory, but is has then been improved, but it is not 100% solid. But the has been made better. Same thing is happening with evolution, the theory becomes stronger because more and more data is constantly added. But it's easy to understand why you didn't get it right, you don't even think viruses can evolve, so again you fail biology 101.

  • @comanche66100 The word theory when used alogside science is a different kind of theory to the normal use of the word theory. Get an education.

  • @NICH0LASM Oh really! I`m going to do something that is long overdue.

    I am going to `downgrade`the status of the theory of evolution to `junk bond`.

    I think I`m the first person to do this in public. Consider yourself priveleged Nichoplasm,

    sorry I meant Nicholasm. The theory of evolution is now officially downgraded to

    `junk status`.

    From now on I refer to the theory of evolution as The Evolution Tale ...I like that, you know tail, tale, somehow fits.

  • @comanche66100 Do what you like... Just bear in mind your body is full of junk DNA that has no purpose. And that you are 98% monkey. And that all living things on earth are genetically cousins. And that one day the sun is going to scorch the earth just like all other stars in the universe do to their celestial bodies. What is the case for religion again? A shed load of old books that all contradict each other? .......Speechless.

  • @NICH0LASM `Bear in mind,` like you know! Listen Cheetah, take a break, take your primate wife or mate (more appropriate) shuffle over using your calloused knuckles to the local zoo and `break bread or wind` or whatever with YOUR relatives.

  • @comanche66100 You are nothing more than a clever animal. Well, if religion helps you get through life fine, but don't spread your religious disease, keep it to yourself as hitchens would say.

  • Very smart man great author and orator i will miss him so much

  • Great Human Being. RIP!

  • @Fiji RIP is a religious expression. I`m sure he wouldn`t approve. How about something more atheistic/evolutionary.

  • I misheard him saying Sunnis and Shiites at first - it sounded like Sonny and Cher...

  • @bowlsallbroken Um... You never replied to my comment. You butted into me and @proudfemale 's exchange of comments... Wait, are you saying you agree with proudfemale?

  • I like how the preview for the Nickelback segment at the end of this clip shows them talking about the notion that their band is shit. Four and a half years on, they just dodged a petition to keep them from playing the Superbowl because anyone with taste still dislikes them. Ha.

  • One of my heroes. thank you Christopher Hitchins.

  • RIP Mr. Hitchens...great interview George!

  • @Metallikidd I`m sure he`d object. RIP is a religious term. Something more atheistic/evolutionary more appropriate.

  • is the host atheist? i've seen a lot of his videos and i can't tell. he seems like a smart guy.

  • Game over! Christopher Hitchens .. bye bye! :-)

  • @astrocr9realmadrid go wank off a priest,stupid

  • @astrocr9realmadrid Are you religious?

  • @astrocr9realmadrid I can't help but feel the contempt radiating from your comment. Just because he had the courage to say what he thought was a real threat to civilization regardless of your own personal beliefs doesn't give you the right to show glee at his demise. He didn't say those things just to stir the pot. He felt they were genuine threats that needed to be addressed. Hitchens never said anything that was any more outrageous than what can be found in the Bible or Koran

  • @Canadianknight18 I just need to say that even though I agree the comment you replied to is retarded, he does have the right to show his unwarranted, moronic glee at Hitchens' demise just as much as Hitchens had the right to show his warranted, justified glee at Falwell's death.

  • @StrangerQuark Great point!

  • @astrocr9realmadrid lol one day you'll die too...everyone is acting like they are immune geeez.

  • A great man!

  • ..and then he died. lol.

  • @nourabella News flash!!! One day you'll die too! worm food equals you! lol lol lol

  • @Em183 luckily, i believe in god, so i have nothing to worry about :D

  • @nourabella Maybe you are deceived. I'm not saying I got the answer, just that you should not be as arrogant!

  • @sommerioslo i'd rather believe in something than believe in nothing. you could resort to the idea that once you die, that's it for you, you're maggot bait. but it seems a lot more fruitful and rational to believe that there's a better life after this one and an almighty god who will embrace believers and punish non-believers. this man attacks what is dear to me, i can laugh at his death if it pleases me. after all, he's only "worm food", what harm can come from laughing at food? (;

  • @nourabella It's ok, just present the proof or even any evidence of your claim, then I would consider it. I don't believe in nothing as you imply, I just don't believe in any religious explanation.

  • @sommerioslo prove that god does NOT exist first.

  • @nourabella I'm not making a claim about a non existent entity. I can't disprove the existence of the "Flying Spaghetti Monster". But this is the last reply I make to you, you are obviously beyond any reason! Religious nut cases should not really be my business at all. I prefer to discuss with people who are somewhat acquainted with elementary reason and logic, but I guess it's not taught in school in the hillbilly country you live in.

  • @sommerioslo I can, I saw it in Milan last week: The Flying Spaghetti Monster`.

    Talk about fantasy? The theory of evolution is a `fantasidal` (look that one up) theory whose adherents continue to `stick`to this asinine, hackneyed, no fact behind it theory, in a manner that gives `stickiness`a new definition. ANYONE who actually believes that a woodpecker, hummingbird, bat, etc.,etc, etc., evolved is a MORON in the 10th degree! like

    it`s

  • @comanche66100 The theory of evolution is well established. Stop spreading you intelligent design bullshit. You are an idiot and should not be talking about science you that you don't have the slightest knowledge in.

  • @olafurhh03 Well established`? You are a Twinkie without the filling.

    Switzerland is coming out with a new cheese, called the Evolution Cheese.

    It will have more `holes` in it than all their other cheeses put together, and a much higher price.

    But the Swiss know, there`s always SOMEONE who`ll buy it!

    Can`t you read? I`m NOT talking about science Einstein., I`m talking about a THEORY that has more holes in it than a baseball bat left in a termite colony for ten years.

  • @comanche66100 Sorry buddy, but you can't win because you are a stupid goat, following your stupid 2000 year old goat herders.

  • @olafurhh03 I can tell from your ènlightened response`that you are a simpleton.

    Go do yourself and all of us a favor and jump off a cliff.

  • @comanche66100 this response from you does not have any content.

    You say theory of evolution is just a theory, only a simpleton who does not have the slightest idea of what a theory is would say that. I ask again. Do you also not believe in gravity? Ever heard of Newton's theory of gravity. I mean its just a theory after all. I bet you will not answer this question but instead say something stupid with no real content at all. Like you last "answer"

  • @olafurhh03 You`re right. Go jump off a cliff.

  • @olafurhh03 You`re right. Go jump off a cliff.

  • @comanche66100 ok, good so you admit that you are stupid and have no input. Then shut up.

  • @olafurhh03 Man you are swift. If it`s well established Einstein, than STOP calling it a THEORY!!

  • @comanche66100 It's still a theory, which never can be fully complete, as there is always more data which could be added (and is).

  • @Hirnlego999 or subtracted!

  • @comanche66100 Don't claim to understand any of it. You're a dogmatist, you choose fiction over reality and you'd fail biology 101 classes easily.

  • @Hirnlego999 You want fiction, read The Origin of the Feces; sorry. I meant Species!

    Word`s out that Darwin was smoking something the Galapalogolian (my term) natives had introduced them to as he was writing.

    He asked them once it was done if he should entitle it The Origin of the Feces; since it was such bullshit, but they said `listen Darwey, give it a title that we can make some money on`.

  • @comanche66100 Hah hah hah. Smoking something, well at least he wasn't hallucinating religious experiences all alone up on the mountains.

    If your God is real btw, then he is the origin of feces. That's right, he invented feces and we're just the delivery system. Some produce it out of both ends, especially creationists.

  • Hey Egbert, scatology. Your statement is `full of it`. Same as that hairbrained theory. Grease those calloused knuckles occasionally, that you drag yourself along with. It`ll make you feel better.

  • @comanche66100 I think I'll buy a slave, torch a witch, stone a few of those who work on the sabbath, go to a church and tell a women to shut up. That'd make me feel better.

    But it's true. If you believe that God created everything (you must, the bible says so) then you must agree that he also created shit. God created shit.

  • @Hirnlego999 I must? Where do you get off saying I must. I musn`t anything O.K. Waldo. As regards shit, yeah, I guess you`re right. You`re living proof.

  • @comanche66100 Well you're free aren't you. But, but, but... you also have an instruction book, which as a good member of the big brother society you make sure to follow both in action and in thought, because otherwise big brother will not take kindly to your rebellion/blasphemy.

    Why did he invent shit btw? Does he shit? He must, we're made in his "perfect" image. I think the reason he doesn't do anything usefull is because he's constantly constipated.

  • @Hirnlego999 I relish the thought that soon idiots like you will be manure. Einstein was smart enough NEVER to speak disparagingly of a Creator. You are too stupid. Soon you too will be `worm food`. You`ve got a `peaceful`future to look forward too.

    What a fool!

  • @comanche66100 Resorting to ad hominems is always a good sign of a limited intellect. Aren't you btw supposed to love thy neighbor, turn the other cheek? Hah hah. I think you're already booking yourself a class 1 ticket to hell to have a meeting with the tyrant.

    "The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses­, the Bible a collection of honourable­, but still primitive legends which are neverthele­ss pretty childish." Einstein

  • @Hirnlego999 Sorry Einstein, ad hominems does not apply here. The definition is: an attempt to negate the truth of a claim through...

    You have no truth to your claim. So I can say what I want.

    Did I ever write that I believe the Bible? Then stop quoting the Bible you idiot.

    I believe in a Creator. One day you`ll have to face him.

    Signing off once and for all with an idiot like you.

  • @comanche66100 Yes you believe, but faith is useless as a stroll on any insane asylum will tell you. And then you claim to know that'll meet a deity. Do you believe or do you know, which is it? And which God is it? Is it Zeus? He seems much cooler than Yahweh. The use of a threat is about as pointless as a hippy / new age dolt threatening to punch me with his or her aura.

  • @comanche66100 "Einstein was smart enough NEVER to speak disparagingly of a Creator."

    What about this then?

    "I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it." (Albert Einstein, 1954)

  • @comanche66100 What a fucktard. Go look up what a Scientific Theory is before making such immeasurably ignorant and stupifying statements.

  • @comanche66100 LOL, you obviously don't know what a theory means. Do you also not acknowledge gravity?

  • @comanche66100 Are you stupid or a troll? Well, I guess both.

  • @comanche66100 I bet you don't even know what the theory of evolution is.... I would love to hear resoned, thought out, coherent explanation of your total dismissal of it....

  • @akrulla Sure. I can do it with one example; woody woodpecker. Can you please explain to me how a slime amoeba or whatever crawled onto Waikkiki Beach and eventually evolved into a woodpecker? I`ll give you a head start. You can take it from when he evolved a beak, but not the shock absorbers that woodpeckers possess. What put it into his head (since he was already eating bugs on the ground) to get it into his head to climb a tree and try boring through the bark? Should be easy.

  • @comanche66100 It is. So a bird with a slightly thicker skull than it's siblings was going to eat a grub but the grub crawled into some rotted wood. The bird pecked through the wood to get the grub and so becomes more successful and has more offspring. It's offspring have the same traits but one of it's children has a slightly thicker skull and cushioning fluid so it is more successful and has more chldren. These offspring also have thicker skulls.... and so on.

  • @akrulla Thank you for showing how asinine the idea that birds evolved by your incredible explanation.

    I have to say, that if you actually believe what you wrote, then someone else BESIDES the bird has a Thick Skull!

  • @comanche66100 Why anyone would waste there time trying to explain anything to the likes of you is beyond me. Trying to reason with people like you is like trying to reason with a two year old child. You are thick as a brick

  • @comanche66100 Oh very mature. Once again, another clear display of ignorant dismissal and a childish insult. I feel sorry for you. You are obviously nothing but a troll who has no actual interest in learning anything.

  • @akrulla By contrast, humankind seems not to evolve at all - at least, not morally. It's capacity for all forms of immorality has not diminished over millennia. The twentieth century was the bloodiest and most violent in all of recorded history. This only serves to validate Christianity's claim that we need a Saviour.

  • @sommeriosloA very simple reason why evolutionists continue to administer `life support`to this theory that long ago suffered cardiac arrest.

    Richard Lewontin an influential evolutionist states: many scientists are willing to accept unproven scientific claims because they `have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism`. He continues: many scientists refuse even to consider the possibility of an intelligent Designer, because it would allow a Divine foot in the door.

  • Comment removed

  • @nourabella I can prove satan doesn't exist

  • @HarrysSecret I can prove you are a Galyptocheraklion.

    Hey harry, I`ll give you 6 months to find the meaning of that.

  • @nourabella You can't prove that something doesn't exist. I have a family of microscopic invisible shepshifitng unicorns that can fly and talk only to me that live in my sock drawer.... Prove they don't exist numbnuts.

  • @akrulla "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence" - CH

  • @knightofbaghdad Wonderfully stated, and well applied to the cockamaney theory of evolution.

  • Great point for disproving the evolution theory.

  • @nourabella Great comment.

  • @comanche66100 cheers, man. reading your responses to these knobheaded divs restored my faith in humanity to some extent, lol. though, i must say, man can't reason with dog; all they do is bark whilst you attempt to reason with them. they are all hopeless nut-cases.

  • @nourabella Thanks for the support. It`s fun sometimes batting these `nut-cases`around.

    It`s simple, there`s been a `cover-up` in the presenting of this asinine theory that makes Watergate look like traffic violation.

  • @Em183 Great nourabella. I`d love to rake the remains of these turds around when they

    have evolved to the state that Mr. Hitchens has evolved to.

    To deny a Creator is the most arrogant statement a tiny human can utter.

    Better to say Ì`m not sure, than to deny the Creator.

    They are all Mussolinis in their arrogance!

  • RIP Hitchens, we miss you already

  • @bowlsallbroken What I invoked was not answering his statement since it's so stupid. If a guy yells from an audience at me "MOHAMMED WAS A PEDOPHILE, HE BEAT WOMEN, RAPED PEOPLE, BAAHBABAAAAHHH" (notice how @proudfemale doesn't bring any evidence for these absurd claims, spreading hate) then I have the right not to dignify this with going through the trouble to give sources, explain events, and explain the absurdness of these claims. You're invoking the Not Reading And Using Your Head fallacy...

  • @Zeegoner

    Here's a hint for you Ace: I was replying to the comment I was replying to - nothing else. Care to address what I said, or do you just want an excuse to rant at me for things *other people* said?

    Your rebuttal was 100% fallacious. Now, if you don't care about that, so be it, but it's a damned good reason to right you off as someone incapable of having a proper discussion with.

  • @proudfemale all of those statements are false and you need to just go away before you humiliate yourself even further

  • Sprinkle the right water or eat the right wafer...That view of religion could not be farther from the meaning of religion to me.

  • Seeing a preview for an interview with Nickleback following an interview with Christopher Hitchens makes me applaud, in a weird way, the show's attempt of objectivity towards intellectual trends.

  • Comment removed

  • I like this interviewer he asks good questions.

  • christopher hitchens the reason sunnis and shias are murdering each other is because not a SINGLE one of them are a Muslim. Islam teaches there be no "sects." If you're a Muslim, you follow the Quran and what Muhammad did. The end. Period full stop. Anything else, you're not a Muslim