I think some of the dots are off merely because of your own off angle perspective. You should try a 3D program where you firstly map it like you seen it in a 2D plane, and then to try to fight the right angle in combination by logic and systematically thinking where the dots lie indepth. I Really would like to see a resultw where all dots allign perfectly, still being to true to the off angle 2D mapping.
The circles are all the same size and are aligned in the same 2 dimensional plane therefore cannot possibly be part of the original scene but superimposed (the orange circles are clearly overlaid over all the clouds) Scratches inside a camera will have similar results, but these clearly appear after processing and are artifacts not present in the original scene.
@Geothemusicman Eh what is your point? Ofcourse the orange circles are superimposed, I used them to increase the visibility of the objects (dark orbs in the middle of orange circles). It is these objects that appear... I thought this was obvious?
See the first image, there you can see before and after usage of this "filter". Understand this is just to clearify where the objects are.
@maxxsee Ok, I clearly got the wrong end of the stick there - however, I see nothing to indicate that the dots are anything but artifacts produced by the camera rather than anything actually present. I would think the fact that they align would support that; the point I made about the plane of alignment still applies.
@Geothemusicman Shit happens, no worries. I understand you are sceptical weather these objects are from the camera or in the air. However I've filmed these objects fly in countless videos, they make 90 degree turns and move extremely fast. So fast, as a matter of fact, that you usually need to use slow motion to even notice them. In some pictures there are no artifacts at all, in some 1 or 2, and in some like in this video serveral, in as far as I can wrap my head around, in formations.
@maxxsee I see alot of dots in the shots that you missed, may want to check your lens out on your camera to see if it got struck by something and has small scratches and dings in it.
@iwannabedspd I watched these photoes very carefully and the only photo I found it difficult to dissern some of the objects was in the last photo. Mostly though the objects are very visible, and no objects are outside the lines. Watch the first 2 pictures atleast it is true there.
Those are know in the UFO world as "rods." Some speculate that they are organic bugs flying so fast that only a fast shutter speed on a camera can catch them. Clearly these are not bugs. Are these real photos? Or is this a hoax? If they are real, it is fascinating.
@skycop61 Hi, yes ofcourse the pictures are as very real. The objects also move very quickly making 90 degree turns on a dime. Rods little nanomachines or what they are, not sure.
definitely a paintjob
TheAtillaB 3 days ago
Yeah! ORANGE DOTS on a SEPIA IMAGE is QUITE ODD!
dieztendix 2 weeks ago
@dieztendix 5 yars old?
They are enhanced the objects. The objects are the black orbs...... Sigh
maxxsee 2 weeks ago
OK...!
809380 1 month ago
@809380 ...
maxxsee 1 month ago
Strange, you have a numeric camera ? You see those lines directly from the camera to your computer ?
809380 1 month ago
@809380 What do you mean? The lines you see are photoshopped in to illustrate the objects formations. The black dots are the objects.
maxxsee 1 month ago
dirt on your lens
jakeflow27 1 month ago
@jakeflow27 Fail.
maxxsee 1 month ago
I can do this on MS PAINT.
WesternShinigami 1 month ago
I think some of the dots are off merely because of your own off angle perspective. You should try a 3D program where you firstly map it like you seen it in a 2D plane, and then to try to fight the right angle in combination by logic and systematically thinking where the dots lie indepth. I Really would like to see a resultw where all dots allign perfectly, still being to true to the off angle 2D mapping.
bokany 2 months ago
@bokany I think they arrange to my camera.
maxxsee 1 month ago
The circles are all the same size and are aligned in the same 2 dimensional plane therefore cannot possibly be part of the original scene but superimposed (the orange circles are clearly overlaid over all the clouds) Scratches inside a camera will have similar results, but these clearly appear after processing and are artifacts not present in the original scene.
Geothemusicman 6 months ago
@Geothemusicman Eh what is your point? Ofcourse the orange circles are superimposed, I used them to increase the visibility of the objects (dark orbs in the middle of orange circles). It is these objects that appear... I thought this was obvious?
See the first image, there you can see before and after usage of this "filter". Understand this is just to clearify where the objects are.
maxxsee 6 months ago
@maxxsee Ok, I clearly got the wrong end of the stick there - however, I see nothing to indicate that the dots are anything but artifacts produced by the camera rather than anything actually present. I would think the fact that they align would support that; the point I made about the plane of alignment still applies.
Geothemusicman 6 months ago
@Geothemusicman Shit happens, no worries. I understand you are sceptical weather these objects are from the camera or in the air. However I've filmed these objects fly in countless videos, they make 90 degree turns and move extremely fast. So fast, as a matter of fact, that you usually need to use slow motion to even notice them. In some pictures there are no artifacts at all, in some 1 or 2, and in some like in this video serveral, in as far as I can wrap my head around, in formations.
maxxsee 6 months ago
ROFLMAO
iwannabedspd 7 months ago
@iwannabedspd why?
maxxsee 7 months ago
@maxxsee well honestly when I first saw the video I was skeptical.
iwannabedspd 6 months ago
@maxxsee I see alot of dots in the shots that you missed, may want to check your lens out on your camera to see if it got struck by something and has small scratches and dings in it.
iwannabedspd 6 months ago
@iwannabedspd I watched these photoes very carefully and the only photo I found it difficult to dissern some of the objects was in the last photo. Mostly though the objects are very visible, and no objects are outside the lines. Watch the first 2 pictures atleast it is true there.
maxxsee 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@maxxsee I see. Ok I will check it out.
iwannabedspd 5 months ago
We call em.... birds!
DutchBuzz9 9 months ago
...right...nothing but bovine flatulence...WE'RE KILLING THE EARTH!!!!!!...
TheBadhaggis 11 months ago
Let me guess....ya didnt see anything until you looked at the photos, right?
Yeah...thought so.
frankensteinmoneymac 1 year ago
@frankensteinmoneymac Correct. I never see them "live" so to speak. But in the photos they appear,
maxxsee 1 year ago
Those are know in the UFO world as "rods." Some speculate that they are organic bugs flying so fast that only a fast shutter speed on a camera can catch them. Clearly these are not bugs. Are these real photos? Or is this a hoax? If they are real, it is fascinating.
skycop61 1 year ago
@skycop61 Hi, yes ofcourse the pictures are as very real. The objects also move very quickly making 90 degree turns on a dime. Rods little nanomachines or what they are, not sure.
maxxsee 1 year ago
Orbs
csj3rd 1 year ago
@csj3rd yep it certainly appears so!
maxxsee 1 year ago
Good Job 5*****
highercalling88 2 years ago
Excellent video, very well made. Keep an eye on the sky. They have been here longer than many people would like to believe.
5*****
exposethenwo2012 2 years ago
@HigherThanEagle Indeed m8, indeed!
Some of all the stuff I discovere, I almost missed completely.
They are here and they are in our skies with 100% certainty!
I doubted it for a long time but now I Know.
maxxsee 2 years ago
wat is this? so?
orlan1234 2 years ago
@orlan1234 dunno. ufos or something. maybe s c nanobots.
maxxsee 2 years ago
name of the music?
alfok 2 years ago
@alfok Vajra. Va Vajra to be exact.
maxxsee 2 years ago
The music fits this video very well. It has that curious yet perplexing melody to it.
Muglosx 2 years ago 2
could be dead pixels on the ccd sensor, do a test and photograph a white piece of paper.
lycophyton 2 years ago
already did many times.. there is nothing wrong with the camera.
maxxsee 2 years ago