Rubik's Cube 3x3 7.77 seconds Non-Lucky

[apagikdieh]

it is in add math or physics formula??

[darthvaderyoda]

What PLL was that?

[CubingGymnast]

@darthvaderyoda A-Perm

[pey3b]

@darthvaderyoda Permutation Last Layer

[nish4speed]

wht cross colour means

[davidgreece1]

whats non lucky?

[rsnba1]

Nice Solve! I tried it lol wasn't as fast as you but I feel my time was decent it was 25.21

[VayneAurellius]

What is y2 and x?

[orvillemiran]

rotation of cube itself,.from x and y axis

[jiyaiya]

y=u

but it just the whole cube turn

x=R

as same the the y

but is just turn to directtion R

[TheMcKoni]

if there is written x or y then you must turn all the cube not just 1 layer (sorry for bad english)

[LorenzoCubes]

its lucky because of the 7's.

its not lucky because it was a FORCED oll skip.

[TheAir084]

U skip OLL! :D That´s Lucky! :D

[Ankl3Sp4nk3r]

Sigh, personally I think it's lucky.. he solved the cube in 39 moves (not counting turns). Unless you're averaging 40-43 moves a solve, this solve is lucky.

As you all know, every cuber has their own definition of a "lucky solve".. whether it be an extended cross or 2 move cross or pll/oll skip. I'm basing your luck as statistically improbable, since your solves aren't 39 moves every time.. or are they? o.O

[HmongZboy]

i dont understand the scramble i can solve it but urs is faster can u tell me about the scramble

[guitarherothre]

thats the luckiest solve ive ever seen! so many 7s! Gotta be the luckiest ever lol

[koenarens]

ok srry saw it u done f2l tricks for oll skip but how u did that? and btw u r good ;) thought u had a prescrambled cube

[koenarens]

u skiped the oll so its lucky xD

[Born4Guitar97]

exactly what i was going to say but still freking awesome. just wanna say a thing can u profe it is 7,77 and not 20 sec cuzz it doesn't were with timer

[Greeneyeskater93]

someone memorized the scramble

[eamsch]

its real.

[GiannicTheGod]

it isn't lucky cause i assure you, that he tried hundred of times to success... ;P

[SteelMagyar]

I think it was just some algorithms.

[Nukoca]

You're right. But he has to know when to use them. Solving intuitively, it might take a while longer.

[ThisIsWEB]

777? That IS lucky :P

[LoRDJoN12697]

your lucky dude

you skipped 1st and 2nd F2L and you also skipped OLL

[13rAdJa13]

but he skipped the OLL even though he used a diff. algo, that's still luck.

[RamoRM07]

where can i find gods algorithm?

[jemar200]

easyiest cramble in the world i tried it a good four pieces a correct and just need f2 saving him lots of time

[shafiqdms1]

an oll skip is lucky

[esquimalt1]

he workded for it

[juhnuthegod]

You said non-lucky, then make same time 10 times!

[Shad0wStackz]

fuck you!

[neroflux]

Rar! That was lucky even if you used ZBf2l!

[jifoye]

still freaking fast in slow mo! whoaaah! great stuff kiddo!

[6a6s6d6f]

7.77=godly number xD

[Ankl3Sp4nk3r]

i think an oll skip is considered lucky, even if you force it.

[Crickets2010]

excatly, he forced it, not so lucky if he had to work for it.

[skatepamplonaa]

ala k bisiao

[The3pointswoosh]

look a his hands no way they can move that fast

[breaker69alsomagicia]

why not?

[DSFreak99]

i kinda agree

[The3pointswoosh]

ok guys i am sorry i commented this in that sort of way. I was in a bad mood that day.

[xyborgcubinots]

damn it!!!!!!!!1

[3nZoTheKing]

damn. YOU'RE MY IDOL!

[tom25910]

7.77 what a lucky number!

[Genie1048]

I was actually replying to someone else. oops.

Harris Chan is still my fav cuber besides myself

[013579asdfgh]

That was really good!!

[wegaengine1]

is he using ZBF2L?

[Genie1048]

No. He's using normal F2L with some additional techinques. The last pair is an example of such a technique, as he used an f2l alg that preserves ll orientation. Go to cubefreak in the f2l and you'll see it. That or cubefreak's misc. techniques

[wallarts]

ow my god i dont see ur hands :D :D

[Alwayslovn]

its real you just have to know all the pll's and oll's plus the jessica fredrich method and a well lubricated cube.try it

[Sa967St]

sheesh people, that solve was NOT fake!!

you're all just jealous that harris chan is one of the best speedcubers ever :p

[dziadek667]

It's fake......... cross +one slot for free + 2 times almost finished slots....dude you suck

[BoLlAdInHo]

it isn't fake.

And if it was, it doesn't mean that he suck's.

I think he's awesome!

[dziadek667]

yes, i think he is awesome, but i thought it was fckin Lucky case :P

[pwn202]

Lol fuck off he's harris chan, he's the cube god ;o

[BoLlAdInHo]

That's true, the world number 1.

[darkstriker90]

it isn't fastforwarded..this guy can actually do 7.77 seconds..

[truefucknlove]

idiot,,

[dumplingsz]

cool buh wht do tha letters mean???

[arcturian627]

They're algorithms, they basically tell you which side of the rubik's cube you're supposed to move. for example 'Ri' is right inverted, so you move the right side of the cube counter-clockwise.

(Geez why did you guys minus his comment?)

[crazyasianskills]

ur gnarlyyy bro

[pwn202]

that was FREAKING SICK

[Rubix189]

Please help me

In some F2L, OLL and PLL the algoritms have things in them such as 'x' 'y' and 'z'

Can someone please tell me what these are.

I figured they have something to do with moving the whole cube, but not sure how or what to move

please help!

[minus1111]

y is a horizontal move - y' - to the left, y - to the right. x is vertical one - x - up, x' - down. I don't know what z stand for, I havens met such thing yet. Hope I helped ;)

[Rubix189]

Than you very much!!!

[PestVic]

watch my notation video. it explains it perfectly

[TheRealRslive]

oll skip = with lucky in my opinion :D

[Sankaku135]

isn't the world record 9 seconds or something?

[kolraz]

It has to be achieved in competition to be classed as official, so yes the WR is still 9.55.

[superviper203]

hmmm don't get the numbers and stuff... someone help me

[esquimalt1]

LOL I'm the 9,999 view! Nice Solve!

[TrumpetsOwn]

Ah sweet, well thought out and executed. I normally do pretty well until it gets stuck lol.

[poopy14300]

its cool how you solved it, but i don't get the other part. tell me nnoww

[anojansmart]

wut does x-cross mean???

[eeeeeeeeeeweeeeeeeee]

extended cross, which means solving the cross, but at the same time also solving a corner-edge pair.

[chriss2112]

wow, thats actaully sooo smart. ive never even heard of the word algorithm. i had to copy and paste that.. seriosly it looks like a bunch of random letters with numbers to me, and im 16 by the way

[theroguebando89]

i like how if i look at all the other rubiks cube solves that are under 10 seconds (all are not competition) they are all dissing the maker, yet not this one? interesting.

[deathbox91]

now thats real, u gotta help me on mine. its been 2 years and i still havnt solved it

[cubefreak93]

OLL skip...how can that NOT be lucky!?!

well done anyway

[Sunshine12227]

"Even though I skipped OLL, I worked for it by using a different F2L algorithm to preserve the LL orientation."

[Megashadow2000]

Whats the...??? O.o Dayaaaaaaammmm........

[cripzkillzbloodz]

wat does y mean??

[DillionHayman]

show me how to do that cause i can but not that fast

[DillionHayman]

due are those alga rythums

[Terence254]

duude if only that was an official solve at a comp...

[Xealous]

good stuff.

[joshnghiem]

7.77? dude that's such a divine number.

[Genie1048]

I think that's lucky.

-only 3/4 f2l slots to fill

-no OLL

-Easy PLL

[souleater9189]

the PLL was skipped so it dosent count as lucky, he intenionally was able to aviod the OLL so thats not lucky either. and he had 3 of the f2l slots to fill... also, the 1st slot being lucky isnt enough to constitute a lucky solve, and the fact that the second f2l pair was already made might have been intentional(because when i tried this scramble it was alrerady made and his cross was made to keep it in tact for later)

[Steffb0y]

oll? pll? f2, l2, r1, r2d2? a5 damm you sunk my battle ship wtf?

[ThePizzaGuy92]

hahaha, Steffb0y XD

[edd5190]

PLL was not skipped lol, and he skipped the first pair on purpose, called as extended cross.:)

[souleater9189]

sry, didnt notice what i typed...ment to say wasnt skiped, so even if it was an easy PLL, its not luck:P

[edd5190]

Ah ok.

[speedcuber007]

cube

[speedcuber007]

can some one tell me what the name for the allg that comes wit the

[mfull1991]

you did skip OLL so it was kind of lucky, but anyway great job.

[cardologist]

Shh!

[XsquarebrownieX]

He "worked for it", so the OLL skip is non-lucky.

Instead of doing the normal algo for his last F2L pair, he went out of his way to do another algo, to preserve the LL orientation.

If he did his NORMAL algo, and had the OLL done, then that would be lucky. But he didn't use his normal algo.

[DoodadJenkins]

I don't think this solve is lucky because I see him doing each step, including PLL (which in most cases that I've seen is where people get lucky). Harris Chan is a great speedcuber, congrats dude, you're really freaking good.

[ranooony]

kewl!!!

[mangorabbit11]

i dont understand a dam thing BUT GOOD JOB!

[KraKKersrule]

can someone please explain these formula thingys

[DoodadJenkins]

Yeah sure the formulas are called "algorithms"

They are basically patterns that apply to certain situations. You memorize the moves and situation for each one.

[KraKKersrule]

i know how to solve the rubik's cube with beginners method and i had a brain fart but i knew they were called algorithms but do (these on this video) work in any situation or do they only work during certain situations

[edd5190]

Man, even if I memorized that entire solution, I still couldn't do it as fast as you, Harris.

May The Cube be with you

-Justin the NerdFreak

[souleater9189]

damn...i did memorize that entire solution(actually all those algs just happened to be amongst the few i kno)and couldn't do it in under 10sec...0.O

[LtUnreal]

OR he did the F2L because he was in that position and luckily saved the OLL and said that he intentionally kept it by doing that algorithm.

Just kidding :P

[Mrbuffington]

that was lucky, 7.77 seconds? haha, JACKPOT!!!!nice solve though.

[cardologist]

Yes, thats the whole point. It was intentional! If he did the normal F2L alg, it would ruin the orientation.

[LtUnreal]

Unless the 3 cycle R was intentionally to keep the OLL.

[LtUnreal]

The last F2L he did was a VHF2L, and that is supposed to get the 4 edge pieces on the last layer. He got the 4 corner pieces with it, which is why I would consider that a lucky solve.

[cardologist]

He didn't, we've been over this. He doesn't do VHF2L. He just used a 3-cyle on R.

[LtUnreal]

So then it was a lucky solve, because he skipped a step.

OLL skips are lucky solves, in my opinion.

[pwn202]

ROFL

You think Thrawst owns Harris chan? hahahah, harris is immense

[cardologist]

It was lucky that it was orientatied like that, but it is not a lucky solve.

[RingerINC]

But isn't that the definition of a lucky solve, when something helpful and lucky occurs? Where do you draw the line is what I'm asking.

[cardologist]

Check speedcubing[dot]com/records/re­cords-rules.html

It says it doesn't count as lucky if you worked/anticipated it. He worked for it. Therefore, its not lucky.

[RingerINC]

I didn't see him work for the 8 oriented faces between F2L's 3 and 4. That's my point. He did no anticipating at all, he saw something lucky, and happened to know the algorithm to get out of it with ease.

The knowledge of the algorithm wasn't the lucky part, the lucky part was getting the 8 oriented faces.

[cardologist]

Yes that bit was lucky, but the fact he did a different algorithm makes it a non-lucky solve. Yes it was lucky he got those pieces oriented, but it was not a lucky solve.

[RingerINC]

All I claim is that because of that luck, the OLL was able to be skipped. We disagree as to what constitutes a lucky skip of OLL. You draw the line at a single step, I'm willing to take it back up to 2 steps.

[RingerINC]

And I think the speedcubing rules are ambiguous. What constitues a 'step' in their rulebook? If they were to get more anal on rules, they'd probably rule this a lucky solve.

[cardologist]

I actually think Chan asked RonVB if it was lucky or not. RonVB said it wasn't lucky.

[RingerINC]

Touche, I still don't like it though. He didn't work between F2L 3 and F2L 4 to get to a state he knew.

[cardologist]

Luck or not, it was still a really good solve!

[mybuickskill6979]

dude thrwast can beat it. with a non lucky solve too lol!!

[ThePizzaGuy92]

stupid-ass

[mybuickskill6979]

lol!! dude it was a joke kick back.  dude it was a good solve man for sure. no one can discount that!

[aarfan34]

yea rite he averages 20 something seconds

[mybuickskill6979]

dude he has a solve that is done in 3 seconds and change. now yes its a set scramble and solution. BUT it is faster then 7.77 and who says he didn't do the same?

[RingerINC]

That's actually lucky. I would argue an OLL skip of all things is a huge lucky solve. (Unless you were doing some mad ZBF2L [which you knew would orient corners too], or saw the last insertion + OLL, which I kinda doubt)

[cardologist]

It wasn't lucky. All of the top was done, but if he had done his normal algorithim for the F2L it would have ruined it. So he used a different algorithim which kept the orientation, he worked for the skip.

[RingerINC]

The fact was, though, that between his 3rd and 4th insertion he got a lucky OLL. Admittedly, that could be classified as "one of the few 4th F2L insertion to OLL skip" that he knew, but where do you draw the line?

[cardologist]

The fact that he did a different alg makes it non-lucky. He only skipped a step, because he made it.

[RingerINC]

I claim that it was <10% chance between his 3rd and 4th F2L insertion that he would get something which is classified as helpful (i.e. 4 edges, 3 corners face up), and hence lucky.

[WWGP]

duuudes...the numbers..so many damn numbers....

[ThePizzaGuy92]

you mean letters?

[ravi12346]

Nice solve, but I consider things like this lucky because I can't do them every time (or, specifically, 20% of the time.) In any case, my best lucky solve is 7.98 seconds, and my best non-lucky is 9.72. You win. ;)

[apollow18]

da hell do the numbers mean!!!!

[zypheryss]

what kind of stickers do u use?

[piotoor]

but, super solve of course

[259]

7.77 is NOT ironic, it is a coincidence. Know the difference between them.

As for the video, I would have thought you were using ZBF2L to orient the edges.

[Thrawst]

I think OLL skip counts as a lucky solve,

nevertheless absolutely beautiful F2L and that extended cross!! Brilliant

[Thrawst]

Oops, my bad didn't full recognize the F2L + E/COLL, GJ!

[ThePizzaGuy92]

it's kinda weird seeing names of people i watch/subscribe on youtube commenting other videos. like Piotoor and Thrawst.

[mybuickskill6979]

lol i agree. its pretty bad ass lol!!

[ickismang]

yeah the 7.77 part is very ironic

[LtUnreal]

But the last F2L you did only gets the yellow edges, not the corners, so wouldn't it still be a lucky solve?

[ThePizzaGuy92]

777? thats biblical. HOLY solve!

[Einstakonan]

Ron analyze the solve and said it was not lucky, since I worked for it. If you had done it, you probably just used the normal algo for that last F2L pair, which you wouldn't get a PLL skipped. But I used a different algo to preserved the OLL (aka I worked for it).

[sadzior]

tell me is that a LC or not? i consider it as a LC, no matter hat you did or didn't do. OLL was skipped=LC ?

[259]

Yeah, you're right. This isn't eligible for the unofficial world record because it didn't follow the rules.

[piotoor]

Without touching the cube before start! Not a valid solve=no record!!!

[sadzior]

i would say its still a LC, anyway very impressive :]