This whole debate is fucking stupid. The constitution is just a piece of paper, it has no authority. Its like debating over the details and mechanics of magic in harry potter. Really stupid and irrelevant where neither side can win.
As an ardent socialist and proponent of universal (evil statist big guv'ment run) health care....this scarecrow dude's an asshole and I don't know him. I'm an old fashion Left-Wing, Liberal Collectivist.....these "conservative" collectivists are all just punks and posuers.
Get a better mic, Adam, that doesn't require you getting it right into their face. I worked for a media company that did executive media training which taught that a person being questioned have certain rights like not being crowded by a camera or a microphone. Sometimes, with other media persons, it could be called assault even battery.
In your state you could move to a different state that had laws that were more to your preference. I am all for libertarian leaning views (like gay marriage) and misc. laws that don't have to do with harm to others but Purist Libertarian strains I think wrongly conceive of this idea that the United States were founded the same way. They might have heavily leaned toward that spectrum but if they all were and intended it to be they wouldn't have included state structurs, powers+delegation
Generally I agree with Adam Kokesh on about 99% of the topics he does interviews for but I really do believe that him (and purist Libertarians) have twisted this thing pretty far. If anybody does their history they know that the individual states were laboratories for democracy and that it was up to them (and their population) to legislate in their own states, reflecting the majority of views held within that state. The fact is that it is meant to be a country where if you don't like the laws
Please don't play the theme music LOUDER than the interview. That's so 50's in a bad sense.I have a Klipsch Ultra 5.1 system ( 500 watts Made in America baby ) and the house shook at the end of that, er, "conservative illumination" .
How do smart people become so twisted and demented like the person that Mr Kokesh is interviewing? It's really incredible how far out people like that are.
Honestly I think he has pretty solid points. His defense of the power of a majority and his little episode when you tried to keep him on topic may have been over the top, but I think everything he's said COULD be justified under the constitution. The "general welfare" and "defense" sections come to mind when I think about these things.
All in all, I think libertarians should stop directing people to the constitution and start educating people on the principles that inspired it instead.
@badaboomrock yea i agree ,and timothy leary had the harrison tax act reversed and thrown out around '68 i think , on the basis of it being a catch 22 ,as it was based on the machine gun act, where you needed to have the contraban in order to recieve a permit or a waiver to have it but but having it you had already commited a crime supposedly,like i said they need to amend the constitution to prohibit alcohol,and to repeal it they had to get rid of the amendment so why not with drugs?
but it is an act not constitutional law Adam make a good point to point out the federal governemnt does not have the constitution Authority to out law any products they can only tax them. the Harrison Act of 1915 that started this shit was a tax that was missread by God fearing ass wipes that make it criminal you use drugs. I say get rid of all frederal drug laws tax them and pay down the debt.
@adamkokesh which is really the only drug that there is a law, a yet still unconstitutional one ,they use it for other drugs by misnomer ,calling all drugs "narcotics" which are not narcotics, they call cocaine a "narcotic"which it is not, its a stimulant,the only drug that are truly narcotics are opiates,but it could be argued that it could apply to sleeping pills,like benadryl,by the entomology of the word itself,the prefix "narco" from the latin ,meaning to sleep,like narcolepsy,
@adamkokesh8:35 i think that guy is an airy fairy, but you should have made the argument that when alcohol prohibition went in they needed to amend the constitution ,the 18th amendment ,and when the repealed prohibition that had to get rid of the 18th amendment, so where is the amendment for the prohibition of MJ?there isnt one ,so it is an illegal law,there is no difference on the prohibition of alcohol vs MJ heroin or any other substance,though there is the narcotics act for heroin and opiate
@bulletproof2353 but it is an act not constitutional law Adam make a good point to point out the federal governemnt does not have the constitution Authority to out law any products they can only tax them. the Harrison Act of 1915 that started this shit was a tax that was missread by God fearing ass wipes that make it criminal you use drugs. I say get rid of all frederal drug laws tax them and pay down the debt.
Typical right wing tyrant. There's no right in the Constitution to smoke marijuana? Adam, you should have asked him where in the Constitution is the right to eat fast food.
Just me wondering, so what he's saying is that if the fed says its unlawful for me to slam my head on a wall cause it causes brain dmg (weed schizophrenia connection) and 51% of the country vote its unlawful. But if my state votes 99% that they don't care cause its my body my problem the feds have the right to forcefully stop me Cause fed overrides sate laws? I'd be exercising my right to bang my head. Can someone clear this for me.
Spending some time today, buying gold, silver, and my first firearm. This SOB would be certainly fine with removing the pistol from dead hands. I can't stand people like that man. Literally trying to be intelligent but clearly brainwashed. March in line buddy..
ok, I think there are many ways, but I cannot recommend them to the masses without much stress to ensue. I believe in tax protest. Conscientious objection, across the board. Fer fucks sake, #OWS Oakland I think, protested Wells Fargo then put $20,000 in an account there. WTF? How about boycotting Christmas until the wars end? No buying anything, but especially Chinese shlock.
Grind this muthufucker to a halt. If you want change, sacrifice is needed. It's not about free stuff, it's self reliance
So if 51% thinks that we can throw jews into concentration camps... Then that's okay???? What if 51% wanted to force everybody to take their chewable meth tablets every morning before school and work...
I was there! Libertarian conservative who completely agrees with Adam. The loser (dude with glasses) actually tried to convince me of the same thing later on. 8:02. I'm i
this is awesome. Please keep posting more things with people who have a different perspective. It is good to hear the non-libertarian side of things for a change
He has a point about there being no prohibition of state power, but it's only to powers the federal government doesn't have. Also, there seems to be a mind block to the fact that there should of never been a federal prohibition law for drugs in the first place. Has he heard of the 9th amendment?
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
Adam. I like your work, and I support you, but you have to keep your passions in check. "I have the mic" is not polite. Arguments must be won form the morality / reason prospective, he was trying to be reasonable and I believe with a little more time and a few more examples he would have gotten it. We need people like him converted, it is important that he does not walk away thinking that Libertarians are aggressive dogmatic assholes. The key for this guy is when he said "activist judges".
Thanks for the interview Adam, he forgot that the Federal Government according to the constitution has no right to tell the states what they have to do. The power in a Republic is God to the People, the county, the state and then the Federal. Our current form is the opposite, the Federal Government is at the top, it's all upside down. The people rule not the government.
According to this guy... all the men in the united sates could band together and vote that all women have to walk around naked and must submit her body to any guy. guaranteed to pass if it came to a vote.
Your restraint and tolerance for the enormously narrow-minded attempting to speak about the verities of the Constitution and it's implementation in our society, is absolutely amazing! I have heard similar arguments for a 'mob rule' preference when it comes to the 'Right of Privacy', but really didn't have the patience to hear 'them' out. When someone is so focused on 'Rights of Government' over the 'Rights of the Governed', it seemed so tiresome or laborious to 'beat a dead horse'.
Agreed, wtf? no general right to privacy? That was the craziest thing I have ever heard coming from a "so-called conservative". Classic example of and I quote, "the greatest argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter" -Winston Churchill
That ladies and gentlemen is why we are SO SCREWED in this country. The powers that be have done a terrific job in dumbing down the population through "education" in gov't schools that we've finally reached the point where black is white and white is black. This little sissy in the video is SO IGNORANT of what "the framers" thought / wanted / did, that is almost leaves me speechless.....
I don't get his arguments about the right to privacy. The right to privacy ISN'T just the 4th Amd., it's a byproduct of the "penumbras and emanations" of the 1st, 3d, 4th, 5th-8th, and 14th Amds. It covers things like a right to send your kid to private school, to use contraceptives, etc. His argument fails for that reason alone.
@garrethdavis better yet walk in, raid the fridge, and turn on a game in the den, while drinking their alcohol and smoking a big fat smelly..... cigar.. LOL Then he may decide our right to privacy actually has a purpose!
Just more evidence that the constitution is indeed a statist document.
“But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.” -Lysander Spooner
thank god for the 2nd amndemt. because that guy needs to be shot ead. ya everyone have a voice but where their brain is as polljuted by bullshit as this guy... cya, thank god im not efver gunna be ya. have fun dying satans minon. fuck you
FFS Adam, this guy is so well-versed in bullshit it's scares me. Well handled, I don't know how you kept your cool. Although you did have your serious face on there for a few minutes, lol
@DJKeebler808 Republic is a form of constitution. Democracy is form of government. You got kingdoms with dictatorship as ruling. Republic with dictatorship as ruling. and so on. Republic IS NOT a form of government.
@nekedemus....who says we need a "government" at all? many societies have utilized forms of social management that do not require systems of control. in a Republic, the rights and privileges of every single person are guaranteed. In a Democracy, those rights and privileges are free for modification whenever it suits the majority. in a Republic, positions of power owe their allegiance to the people. In a Democracy, the people owe their allegiance to whichever leaders promises and delivers most.
He was actually kind of scaring me with all that "Don't interrupt me" jazz. Although sometimes it can happen that one person interrupts the other, that doesn't mean you need to halt the whole conversation to finish.
I'm not a self promoter, I dont have Ads (as yet , I've refused so far ) on my channel, but there I have lectures that explain, with humor , the anti statist position from people who know their shit. Have a look and then ask questions.
Statists really need to start looking closely at the horrid immoral thing you adhere to for fear of ANYTHING else. You say,' what if 'and 'without?' but you are not fully understanding the monster you are supporting. It enslaves you and murders more people on the planet than ANY other entity combined. All with Great EXCUSES. Stop buying it. READ non Statist literature-THINK. Go beyond the rhetoric and programming. Govt is no ones friend. Once you see it, youll get it forever.
Marc Victor ATTY for Freedom writes papers on NOT sticking to or believing in the Constitution as guaranteeing rights. A piece of PAPER that has been changed many times by mob rule. We must go beyond the Constitution. We cannot GO backwards, we must go Forward and rethink our personal enslavement to governments. Belief in government is both sadistic and masochistic when thought about in absolutes, immediate context and objectively. Too bad Most people just cannot see it.
@sozfan1 I disagree that 'government 'was the american experiment, Lack of government intrusion was to be the American experiment. It' didnt work. We are now the biggest government in the world , next to the nearly failed EU experiment. When people realize that government is Immoral, which can do all the things we cant do to each other: murder, steal, disobey it's own laws, we shall come to realize it's uselessness. ne day ALL people will undertstand the absurdity of it and wonder WHY we did it
@SonjaSmith the financial crisis of 2008 wasn't due to government intrusion, but rather the lack of it, likely b/c pols are bought out by the very institutions they're supposed to regulate. where do these private entities get the money to bribe our pols? usury banking.
@sozfan1 Sorry, you are asking the wrong questions and thereby coming up with the wrong answers. But you DO answer your own question here. How do you expect business to conduct authentic Free Trade in which competition reigns (voluntary) and not by government cronyism and favoritism? If government is bought out by business, which of the evils do we eliminate, business which creates jobs, products and prosperity, (voluntary) or government which creates nothing but favoritism to their friends?
@SonjaSmith there's no such thing as free trade--it's impossible to ensure that overseas competition is on a level playing field. they cheat in every way--do you dispute this? we need fair trade. Ross Perot was right: free trade agreements have sucked all the good manufacturing jobs out of the country. tariffs are required to bring them back.
@sozfan1 Government cannot and will not solve the problems it created. It's a mistake to believe they have any desire, capability or will. Your own arguments are circular. The government made the Free Trade agreements, so now Tariffs are required to annul the agreements the government made in the first place? Come on...Think.
@SonjaSmith pols are responsive to the money power, which is presently held by private banks, so free trade agreements are routinely passed. the goal then must be to reclaim the money power so that govt serves the people once again. tariffs are necessary to bring back manufacturing, essential to our economy and our future.
@sozfan1 Usury has been around since the Egyptians. Why dont you look at some vids on my channel which are quite funny, and serious and then talk to me in pms, I'd love the conversation, but for now have to go to dinner. Always welcome to discuss.
@SonjaSmith usury banking undermines national sovereignty. no nation can be sovereign unless its government retains the power to create and control the quantity of money, debt-free and without interest. delegating this power, as the US unwittingly did a century ago, is to surrender that sovereignty.
@sozfan1 preaching to the choir. Now that you GOT THAT, GO further. Read Lysander Spooner, Bastiat, Ayn Rand, Von Mises and many other non statists. You are on the right track.
@SonjaSmith no thanks, they go too far. i believe that government is essential in the struggle against serfdom and plutocracy. it's the shield of the people against tyranny. interestingly, they're quick to identify fractional reserve lending (aka usury) but stop short of ending it and instead propose a gold standard to somehow constrain it, yet history shows time and again that gold only works to the advantage of the rich. the greatest depressions occurred when gold stds were in place.
@sozfan1 Since WHEN did government shield you from serfdom or plutocracy? Since WHEN did government shield you from Tyranny, not BE - but instead forced robbery on you and everyone else to fund WARS. In my lifetime which is about 50 years, in my parents and G.Parents lifetime it's been the same. EVERY DAY, EVERY HOUR. WARS.
You can talk about monetary usury all the day long, like you think you have found the golden goose, but you are still missing the point. Government is Immoral, start -fin.
@SonjaSmith in a controlled-quantity, debt-free money system, the cost of doling out foreign aid and maintaining standing armies and conflicts around the planet would be felt immediately and thus would be voted down. so, usury banking is public enemy #1 and our chief aim should be recovering the money power from them.
@sozfan1 Voted down by whom? No Congressman has ever voted down a war, except Ron Paul. Lincoln printed tons of money to pay for the Civil War and instituted the first draft. Just because govt controls the money does not make it inflation or usuary proof . 'You are so hopelessly dependent on the system, you will fight to protect it'. You actually believe govt serves you, and cannot see the tyranny, while I DO see the $ argument you flay like a dead horse.
@SonjaSmith they vote for spending resolutions in support of war b/c it's paid for by unlimited credit from usury bankers, not our taxes. money is inflation and usury-proof when government controls it. counterfeiting laws would apply against banks that loan out more money than they actually have. only govt issues the money, debt-free, doesn't borrow from private banks, and controls its quantity to achieve full employment and economic stability.
@sozfan1 Fer fucks sake! I understand money, You do not understand government. The smallest government , no matter what system, through prosperity, will always grow into the largest- as parasites on good , hot shit multiply. The voters will always vote themselves FREE SHIT, A gun to the head of all others in a Democracy.
You are like some evangelist that thinks they have the ONE TRUE JESUS, but you are simply an annoying gnat.
Just because you repeat and over repeat does not make it true.
@SonjaSmith money and government are inseparable. government is required to regulate money as a public utility, otherwise it leads to plutocracy and serfdom. government should spend the money into the economy, not give it away. after all, money is a receipt for labor. there's plenty of work to be done and plenty of able workers, all we need is the money to make it happen!!
@SonjaSmith however, i do believe in libertarianism with meaningful monetary reform, as Bill Still advocates, in addition to the idea of state/municipal banks that employ fractional reserve lending for the public good. libertarianism w/o monetary reform is a fool's errand--it plays into the hands of predatory institutions that govt is supposed to protect us from in the first place.
@sozfan1 Government is NEVER on your side. See George Carlin: They don't give a Fuck about you! DO NOT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU! More people should get it. They just steal more from others to give up to Mob demand, impoverishing everyone in the process. They are leeches and do nothing good and should be eliminated. Government is Immoral and the sooner we see that argument the better off we shall be.
@SonjaSmith government is the whole point of the american experiment...without it we'd be dominated by the powers that be: foreign powers, private banks and corporations.
@sozfan1 Ummn, I suppose you dont know who runs this country? We ARE dominated by all those forces, with government collusion. Think deeper, read deeper.
@SonjaSmith vote Bill Still for President: see still2012 [dot] com and watch his award-winning documentary, "Secret of Oz" (bottom of page). usury banking is behind it all--we simply need to take the money power back and stop borrowing.
@sozfan1 I know the Secret of OZ, but this is not about usury and nothing is 'We simply need too.'....Of course Ending the Fed would be a huge start to ending monetary corruption.
@SonjaSmith it's entirely about usury banking--the monopoly power to counterfeit the national currency and issue it as debt w/ unpayable interest for one's own gain. in order to believe that nothing is "we simply need to.." we simply need to believe that nothing is "we simply need to..."--circular reasoning. ending the fed w/o ending govt debt and fractional reserve lending (aka usury) accomplished nothing (per M. Friedman).
the purpose of government is to protect individuals from those more powerful, not to protect people from themselves--that's called a nanny-state! in fact, nanny-states often wind up protecting those more powerful from individuals, which is were we are today. upside-down. occupy, indeed.
OMG, theres so much here it could take an essay. British MA decided that schizo's were attributed to MJ use, WHEN? 1901? What part of the Constitution ever said the government could control health and welfare? Plus..he talks about 51 % rule, which if we actually HAD it, MJ would have been legalized a long time ago. Adding to that, it was never a H&W issue, it was Dow chemical and a false flag about Mexicans.
Uninformed!
There's more but...fuck, simply can't ....500 characters does not cover.
Give me the Tyranny of the Majority over the Tyranny of the minorities any day.
It's the minorities who control your country and the world now. They are responsible for the war, poverty and division in the world. Your constitution (created by a minority) could not stop it. If the majority did rule and we assume they would be tyrants too, at least it would only be a minority who would be powerless.
@therealbradburns Interesting point. One of the only original, well thought out ones in these commentaries. Mob rule is NOT a good system. We need to become individuals and free ourselves from all systems that propose a tyranny over others by force. Democracy,( Mobocracy), Republic, Socialism and Communism are all systems by force. Voluntarism is the only evolved solution against slavery from force of will. The Constitution is also flawed as it can be changed by the mob. Don't stick to it.
@SonjaSmith Thanks for your reply. I like the idea of a pure/direct democracy because it is a realistic option that we can do now that could take the power away from the minority groups and give it back to the people. I believe that if given the option, mankind will choose peace and fairness instead of tyranny and that a direct democracy will naturally evolve into a Voluntarism system. It is the minority groups that have to use tyranny to keep their power.
@therealbradburns How is taking away the power of the minority groups giving back power to 'the people'? You mean the dominant majority? While I was with you at first, I cannot agree now. You are twisting the argument, and I suspect your motive at this point. I do not believe in Democracy (mob rule). I am about Total Personal Freedom. I agree that ONE DAY people might choose Liberty over Tyranny, but until, they SEE the TYRANNY, which they dont now, that day is long in the future. I disagree w/U
@SonjaSmith I don't mean to be twisting anything, my motive is to share my point of view which is that the rule of the dominant majority would be better than the current minority rule. I am trying to understand your point of view too. I would love for us to all have total personal freedom. What do you think is the west way to move towards a society like that?
@therealbradburns Well, my first thought is to hang all traitors past and present on the WH lawn for all to see, and tell Congress to go home and STOP doing whatever Bullshit they think they are doing and get a real job, but that is not very practical is it?
“If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”
@7:23 "..you don't care about ...freedom?" "No, I don't" that should be all you need to know. btw.... @5:43 i had a flashback to elementary school when the nerdiest kid wouldn't get his way at the science fair and would start jumping straight up and down while flailing his hands around... lol (busted)
another braindead fool, who obeys any man made law even if its wrong and even if it conflicts with common sense, its cause of people like this that the world its in the state that it is.
you can also make this argument a 1st amendment type issue. The Government doesn't have the right to tell me what personal habits I practice in the same way they can't tell me what spiritual beliefs I practice.
THIS GUY IS AN IDIOT AND TRYING TO TWIST WHAT WE ARE ACTUALLY SUPPOSE TO HAVE FOR GOV.THE FOUNDERS DESPISED DEMOCRACY.AND HE IS TWISTING THE CONSTITUTION
The people suck, fuck hope! Boy do we got some dumb mother fuckers floating around in this country! Sad thing is the illogical people are the majority!
This whole debate is fucking stupid. The constitution is just a piece of paper, it has no authority. Its like debating over the details and mechanics of magic in harry potter. Really stupid and irrelevant where neither side can win.
kamikazee55 3 days ago
am i the only one that wanted to bitch slap this guy?
pjbsr1961 3 days ago
this dude is DEF a pedophile
tseitz123 4 days ago
"Stick the mic back in my face, and let me finish."- That's what she said.
hilltoploser 4 days ago
Don't mind this guy at all. He seems very well versed, and Adam met his match on this one.
CaliforniaCarpenter7 1 week ago
5:45 this man's true childish, selfish nature really comes out. Look at the deformity of his head, that reflects a unbalanced mental development.
Eucalyptusmusic 1 week ago
As an ardent socialist and proponent of universal (evil statist big guv'ment run) health care....this scarecrow dude's an asshole and I don't know him. I'm an old fashion Left-Wing, Liberal Collectivist.....these "conservative" collectivists are all just punks and posuers.
Eldeecue 1 week ago
he did well in school and was labled smart but he's fucking retarded. you go Adam!
LucidDream101 1 week ago
if there is a "the man" thats totally what he looks like
xcvsdxvsx 2 weeks ago
this guy is so arrogant
capi7al 3 weeks ago
"So are you against a general right to privacy?"
"Oh, Absolutely!"
Hahahahahaha
LTBL88 1 month ago
WOW.. I had this in my favorites and watched it again and I love it more!!!! ADAM this was great.....Holy Cow.....
dwaydway1 1 month ago
Get a better mic, Adam, that doesn't require you getting it right into their face. I worked for a media company that did executive media training which taught that a person being questioned have certain rights like not being crowded by a camera or a microphone. Sometimes, with other media persons, it could be called assault even battery.
exenrontexas 1 month ago
In your state you could move to a different state that had laws that were more to your preference. I am all for libertarian leaning views (like gay marriage) and misc. laws that don't have to do with harm to others but Purist Libertarian strains I think wrongly conceive of this idea that the United States were founded the same way. They might have heavily leaned toward that spectrum but if they all were and intended it to be they wouldn't have included state structurs, powers+delegation
zbutler1125 1 month ago
Generally I agree with Adam Kokesh on about 99% of the topics he does interviews for but I really do believe that him (and purist Libertarians) have twisted this thing pretty far. If anybody does their history they know that the individual states were laboratories for democracy and that it was up to them (and their population) to legislate in their own states, reflecting the majority of views held within that state. The fact is that it is meant to be a country where if you don't like the laws
zbutler1125 1 month ago
Please don't play the theme music LOUDER than the interview. That's so 50's in a bad sense.I have a Klipsch Ultra 5.1 system ( 500 watts Made in America baby ) and the house shook at the end of that, er, "conservative illumination" .
mrearlygold 2 months ago
How do smart people become so twisted and demented like the person that Mr Kokesh is interviewing? It's really incredible how far out people like that are.
mrearlygold 2 months ago
6 people diddle 4 year olds.......
icttrav 2 months ago
Honestly I think he has pretty solid points. His defense of the power of a majority and his little episode when you tried to keep him on topic may have been over the top, but I think everything he's said COULD be justified under the constitution. The "general welfare" and "defense" sections come to mind when I think about these things.
All in all, I think libertarians should stop directing people to the constitution and start educating people on the principles that inspired it instead.
FromMuToYou 2 months ago
"Let me take it from the beginning" for the tenth time because you can't respond to what he actually said.
polarbearanne 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@badaboomrock yea i agree ,and timothy leary had the harrison tax act reversed and thrown out around '68 i think , on the basis of it being a catch 22 ,as it was based on the machine gun act, where you needed to have the contraban in order to recieve a permit or a waiver to have it but but having it you had already commited a crime supposedly,like i said they need to amend the constitution to prohibit alcohol,and to repeal it they had to get rid of the amendment so why not with drugs?
bulletproof2353 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
but it is an act not constitutional law Adam make a good point to point out the federal governemnt does not have the constitution Authority to out law any products they can only tax them. the Harrison Act of 1915 that started this shit was a tax that was missread by God fearing ass wipes that make it criminal you use drugs. I say get rid of all frederal drug laws tax them and pay down the debt.
badaboomrock 2 months ago
wow, the guy sure likes to stomp his feet when the mic is taken away... what a child.
Ratjack 2 months ago 14
Then put it in his mouth again.
primoknoxville 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stick it up his ass.
primoknoxville 3 months ago
Typical. Most Conservatives are Progressives in suits.
GrayGhost8 3 months ago
@GrayGhost8 Draconian-fascist progressives= Conservatives
IndigoVagrant 3 months ago
Put it in his mouth.
primoknoxville 3 months ago
@adamkokesh which is really the only drug that there is a law, a yet still unconstitutional one ,they use it for other drugs by misnomer ,calling all drugs "narcotics" which are not narcotics, they call cocaine a "narcotic"which it is not, its a stimulant,the only drug that are truly narcotics are opiates,but it could be argued that it could apply to sleeping pills,like benadryl,by the entomology of the word itself,the prefix "narco" from the latin ,meaning to sleep,like narcolepsy,
bulletproof2353 3 months ago
@adamkokesh 8:35 i think that guy is an airy fairy, but you should have made the argument that when alcohol prohibition went in they needed to amend the constitution ,the 18th amendment ,and when the repealed prohibition that had to get rid of the 18th amendment, so where is the amendment for the prohibition of MJ?there isnt one ,so it is an illegal law,there is no difference on the prohibition of alcohol vs MJ heroin or any other substance,though there is the narcotics act for heroin and opiate
bulletproof2353 3 months ago
@bulletproof2353 but it is an act not constitutional law Adam make a good point to point out the federal governemnt does not have the constitution Authority to out law any products they can only tax them. the Harrison Act of 1915 that started this shit was a tax that was missread by God fearing ass wipes that make it criminal you use drugs. I say get rid of all frederal drug laws tax them and pay down the debt.
badaboomrock 2 months ago
HAHAHAHAHAH the tags!
IDontWantYourCereal 3 months ago
"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
9th amendment
broncofan92slay 3 months ago
I love the tags you added, Adam.
Psygkosis1 3 months ago
Always interesting to see a grown person throw a temper tantrum like a toddler. wow.
ZYCERIN 3 months ago
the microphone reminds him of a 3 day stint he did in county jail...
waterkeeper03 3 months ago
Typical right wing tyrant. There's no right in the Constitution to smoke marijuana? Adam, you should have asked him where in the Constitution is the right to eat fast food.
grabyourgat 3 months ago
@grabyourgat
Agreed. And, I like the way "right wing tyrant" sounds.
ThePatriotMuckraker 3 months ago
Excellent.
InformationPollution 3 months ago
did you see how the mic goes closer and closer closer closer :)
bjokkor 3 months ago
Guy sounds like he likes other types of things "stuck in his face"
WildKatWays 3 months ago
Just me wondering, so what he's saying is that if the fed says its unlawful for me to slam my head on a wall cause it causes brain dmg (weed schizophrenia connection) and 51% of the country vote its unlawful. But if my state votes 99% that they don't care cause its my body my problem the feds have the right to forcefully stop me Cause fed overrides sate laws? I'd be exercising my right to bang my head. Can someone clear this for me.
MrBGeonzon 3 months ago
What a jackass! *puff puff*
brynolf11 3 months ago
he really looks like molested childeren looll
Dkguerilla 3 months ago
Spending some time today, buying gold, silver, and my first firearm. This SOB would be certainly fine with removing the pistol from dead hands. I can't stand people like that man. Literally trying to be intelligent but clearly brainwashed. March in line buddy..
RonPaulTRUTH 3 months ago
What the fuck!?! I just bought more ammo Adam.
TheHossUSMC 3 months ago
It caused me great discomfort to watch a grown man throw a temper tantrum.
andrewjarvi 3 months ago
Stop interviewing people with brain damage!
IrishLincoln 3 months ago
ok, I think there are many ways, but I cannot recommend them to the masses without much stress to ensue. I believe in tax protest. Conscientious objection, across the board. Fer fucks sake, #OWS Oakland I think, protested Wells Fargo then put $20,000 in an account there. WTF? How about boycotting Christmas until the wars end? No buying anything, but especially Chinese shlock.
Grind this muthufucker to a halt. If you want change, sacrifice is needed. It's not about free stuff, it's self reliance
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
So if 51% thinks that we can throw jews into concentration camps... Then that's okay???? What if 51% wanted to force everybody to take their chewable meth tablets every morning before school and work...
OperationUnicron 3 months ago
Don't interrupt me!!! WAHHHH!!!!!
OperationUnicron 3 months ago
I was there! Libertarian conservative who completely agrees with Adam. The loser (dude with glasses) actually tried to convince me of the same thing later on. 8:02. I'm i
n the green.
4TheLibertyMinded 3 months ago
this is awesome. Please keep posting more things with people who have a different perspective. It is good to hear the non-libertarian side of things for a change
rjnrf 3 months ago
He has a point about there being no prohibition of state power, but it's only to powers the federal government doesn't have. Also, there seems to be a mind block to the fact that there should of never been a federal prohibition law for drugs in the first place. Has he heard of the 9th amendment?
Sophic11 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
You BETCHA that INCLUDES privacy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DutchsMaria 3 months ago
The Federal govt is restrained by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Not the other way around.....This man is scary!
DutchsMaria 3 months ago
Adam. I like your work, and I support you, but you have to keep your passions in check. "I have the mic" is not polite. Arguments must be won form the morality / reason prospective, he was trying to be reasonable and I believe with a little more time and a few more examples he would have gotten it. We need people like him converted, it is important that he does not walk away thinking that Libertarians are aggressive dogmatic assholes. The key for this guy is when he said "activist judges".
filmaker04 3 months ago
Thanks for the interview Adam, he forgot that the Federal Government according to the constitution has no right to tell the states what they have to do. The power in a Republic is God to the People, the county, the state and then the Federal. Our current form is the opposite, the Federal Government is at the top, it's all upside down. The people rule not the government.
LLbenton 3 months ago
Get your mic out of his face Adam! You trying to put somethin in his body that he don't want?
OH forget that, 51% of utube majority says you can....go for it brotha!!!!
batmanjokergorden 3 months ago 16
@batmanjokergorden good call, exactly right.
zegerb0t 1 month ago
I would have punched him in the face when he said he is against a general right to privacy ( 4:13 ) this guy is a completely moron!
37butterflyprincess 3 months ago
According to this guy... all the men in the united sates could band together and vote that all women have to walk around naked and must submit her body to any guy. guaranteed to pass if it came to a vote.
ImRichRu 3 months ago
so he can pwn him
xtcarnage15586 3 months ago
adam should just let him finish
xtcarnage15586 3 months ago
This pipsqueak is the reason for our wars and why you cannot do with your body as you choose.
liOVERLOADil 3 months ago
That guys last name is very, very close to being Wiener (see name tag). Too bad. Could make for some good comic relief.
esopxe 3 months ago
too awkward to watch eekk
Cjaz84 3 months ago
How many men does it take to properly vote the panties off an unwilling woman?
Voting is a crime.
ferval59 3 months ago
I like how Adam puts the mic back in this dork's face as the interview goes on lol
fifthletteris 3 months ago
LMAO
HaLfDeAdArtist1 3 months ago
seems like the right to privacy is linked to property rights--you can't have one w/o the other. wonder what he'd say to that.
sozfan1 3 months ago
Convoluted doesn't even begin to....
So-called conservatives: WHY U NO READ CONSTITUTION?!
deadballo 3 months ago
Your restraint and tolerance for the enormously narrow-minded attempting to speak about the verities of the Constitution and it's implementation in our society, is absolutely amazing! I have heard similar arguments for a 'mob rule' preference when it comes to the 'Right of Privacy', but really didn't have the patience to hear 'them' out. When someone is so focused on 'Rights of Government' over the 'Rights of the Governed', it seemed so tiresome or laborious to 'beat a dead horse'.
RobToemik 3 months ago
I want to smash his face in within the first minute of hearing him speak.
vestavixmgs 3 months ago
Agreed, wtf? no general right to privacy? That was the craziest thing I have ever heard coming from a "so-called conservative". Classic example of and I quote, "the greatest argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter" -Winston Churchill
SonofAmericanREV 3 months ago
That ladies and gentlemen is why we are SO SCREWED in this country. The powers that be have done a terrific job in dumbing down the population through "education" in gov't schools that we've finally reached the point where black is white and white is black. This little sissy in the video is SO IGNORANT of what "the framers" thought / wanted / did, that is almost leaves me speechless.....
johnjen5321 3 months ago
I don't get his arguments about the right to privacy. The right to privacy ISN'T just the 4th Amd., it's a byproduct of the "penumbras and emanations" of the 1st, 3d, 4th, 5th-8th, and 14th Amds. It covers things like a right to send your kid to private school, to use contraceptives, etc. His argument fails for that reason alone.
SunSunSuperFun 3 months ago
What a weenie.
littledogterrell20 3 months ago
The right to privacy is in the 9th Amendment. The 9th Amendment is so underrated.
kelecable 3 months ago
You look like you're gonna kill him!
What a douche. Typical person who belongs in the Federal Government.
garrethdavis 3 months ago
what a moron. Against privacy? how about I come to your house and stare in your windows at you? Fool.
garrethdavis 3 months ago
@garrethdavis better yet walk in, raid the fridge, and turn on a game in the den, while drinking their alcohol and smoking a big fat smelly..... cigar.. LOL Then he may decide our right to privacy actually has a purpose!
TheFootegirl73 3 months ago
No right to privacy?
FUCK THIS GUY. HACK HIS SHIT, AND POST IT ONLINE
HE HAS GIVEN UP ALL RIGHTS TO PRIVACY!
godofgambling 3 months ago
Adam... i want to donate. How? You don't take paypal?
xxCrazySmooth 3 months ago
This guy LOVES hearing himself speak, doesn't he?
loriwagoner 3 months ago
Just more evidence that the constitution is indeed a statist document.
“But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist.” -Lysander Spooner
philliproemer21 3 months ago
nice one brother.
thethinktankchannel 3 months ago in playlist mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
thank god for the 2nd amndemt. because that guy needs to be shot ead. ya everyone have a voice but where their brain is as polljuted by bullshit as this guy... cya, thank god im not efver gunna be ya. have fun dying satans minon. fuck you
MrAWAKENED1 3 months ago
God, I can't stand weasely little bitches like this guy.
Garmichael1 3 months ago in playlist More videos from AdamKokesh
Alex Jones would describe this guy as a chicken necked control freak.
tranceemerson 3 months ago
FFS Adam, this guy is so well-versed in bullshit it's scares me. Well handled, I don't know how you kept your cool. Although you did have your serious face on there for a few minutes, lol
ArchimedeanEye 3 months ago
They've interrupted our rights for how long?
iHRpro 3 months ago
Adam, YOU ROCK
mrhaw 3 months ago
This guy David Wiesner is a total idiot.
optimumperformance 3 months ago
HAHAHAHA ADAM ADMIT IT YOU WERE LAUGHING UR ASS OFF INSIDE WHEN U KEPT PUTTING THE MIC IN HIS FACE..... HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAH....
+50,000 bonus points!!!!
Lunartechno 3 months ago
Anyone who believes we live in a Democracy is not a Conservative. We live in a REPUBLIC!
DJKeebler808 3 months ago 13
@DJKeebler808 Technically we live in a Fascist Bribe-ocracy. :) We should live in a Republic but we have allowed that to be hijacked. :)
dirint 3 months ago
@DJKeebler808 Republic is a form of constitution. Democracy is form of government. You got kingdoms with dictatorship as ruling. Republic with dictatorship as ruling. and so on. Republic IS NOT a form of government.
nekedemus 3 months ago
@nekedemus....who says we need a "government" at all? many societies have utilized forms of social management that do not require systems of control. in a Republic, the rights and privileges of every single person are guaranteed. In a Democracy, those rights and privileges are free for modification whenever it suits the majority. in a Republic, positions of power owe their allegiance to the people. In a Democracy, the people owe their allegiance to whichever leaders promises and delivers most.
DJKeebler808 3 months ago
Is it just me or do you want to just give this guy a piece of cheese to nibble on? -.- sorry I know its wrong, was just stuck in my head
urhothookup 3 months ago
FUCK this guy! He's obviously got something wrong with his brain. Adam- you KICK ASS!
makeshiftbattlefield 3 months ago
wow a real zombie!
Macaframa1 3 months ago
Oooo-hoooo-hoooo!! Don't interrupt me! I'm going to tell my boyfriend you interrupted me!
n310ea 3 months ago
He was actually kind of scaring me with all that "Don't interrupt me" jazz. Although sometimes it can happen that one person interrupts the other, that doesn't mean you need to halt the whole conversation to finish.
DeathShok 3 months ago in playlist More videos from AdamKokesh
I'm not a self promoter, I dont have Ads (as yet , I've refused so far ) on my channel, but there I have lectures that explain, with humor , the anti statist position from people who know their shit. Have a look and then ask questions.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
Statists really need to start looking closely at the horrid immoral thing you adhere to for fear of ANYTHING else. You say,' what if 'and 'without?' but you are not fully understanding the monster you are supporting. It enslaves you and murders more people on the planet than ANY other entity combined. All with Great EXCUSES. Stop buying it. READ non Statist literature-THINK. Go beyond the rhetoric and programming. Govt is no ones friend. Once you see it, youll get it forever.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
Wow this guy just combined nationalism and socialism what a pioneer... wait a minute....
pCriistopher 3 months ago
The Constitution is not a legal document.
jamezbond78 3 months ago
Marc Victor ATTY for Freedom writes papers on NOT sticking to or believing in the Constitution as guaranteeing rights. A piece of PAPER that has been changed many times by mob rule. We must go beyond the Constitution. We cannot GO backwards, we must go Forward and rethink our personal enslavement to governments. Belief in government is both sadistic and masochistic when thought about in absolutes, immediate context and objectively. Too bad Most people just cannot see it.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
nanny-states appear to be the equilibrium point of government, so citizens must continually strive to keep government on their side
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 By voting them selves more free shit.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith rather by keeping govt.'s nose out of your shit and in the shit of corporations and banks.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 I disagree that 'government 'was the american experiment, Lack of government intrusion was to be the American experiment. It' didnt work. We are now the biggest government in the world , next to the nearly failed EU experiment. When people realize that government is Immoral, which can do all the things we cant do to each other: murder, steal, disobey it's own laws, we shall come to realize it's uselessness. ne day ALL people will undertstand the absurdity of it and wonder WHY we did it
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith the financial crisis of 2008 wasn't due to government intrusion, but rather the lack of it, likely b/c pols are bought out by the very institutions they're supposed to regulate. where do these private entities get the money to bribe our pols? usury banking.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Sorry, you are asking the wrong questions and thereby coming up with the wrong answers. But you DO answer your own question here. How do you expect business to conduct authentic Free Trade in which competition reigns (voluntary) and not by government cronyism and favoritism? If government is bought out by business, which of the evils do we eliminate, business which creates jobs, products and prosperity, (voluntary) or government which creates nothing but favoritism to their friends?
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith there's no such thing as free trade--it's impossible to ensure that overseas competition is on a level playing field. they cheat in every way--do you dispute this? we need fair trade. Ross Perot was right: free trade agreements have sucked all the good manufacturing jobs out of the country. tariffs are required to bring them back.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Government cannot and will not solve the problems it created. It's a mistake to believe they have any desire, capability or will. Your own arguments are circular. The government made the Free Trade agreements, so now Tariffs are required to annul the agreements the government made in the first place? Come on...Think.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith pols are responsive to the money power, which is presently held by private banks, so free trade agreements are routinely passed. the goal then must be to reclaim the money power so that govt serves the people once again. tariffs are necessary to bring back manufacturing, essential to our economy and our future.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Usury has been around since the Egyptians. Why dont you look at some vids on my channel which are quite funny, and serious and then talk to me in pms, I'd love the conversation, but for now have to go to dinner. Always welcome to discuss.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith usury banking undermines national sovereignty. no nation can be sovereign unless its government retains the power to create and control the quantity of money, debt-free and without interest. delegating this power, as the US unwittingly did a century ago, is to surrender that sovereignty.
sozfan1 3 months ago
Comment removed
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@sozfan1 preaching to the choir. Now that you GOT THAT, GO further. Read Lysander Spooner, Bastiat, Ayn Rand, Von Mises and many other non statists. You are on the right track.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith no thanks, they go too far. i believe that government is essential in the struggle against serfdom and plutocracy. it's the shield of the people against tyranny. interestingly, they're quick to identify fractional reserve lending (aka usury) but stop short of ending it and instead propose a gold standard to somehow constrain it, yet history shows time and again that gold only works to the advantage of the rich. the greatest depressions occurred when gold stds were in place.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Since WHEN did government shield you from serfdom or plutocracy? Since WHEN did government shield you from Tyranny, not BE - but instead forced robbery on you and everyone else to fund WARS. In my lifetime which is about 50 years, in my parents and G.Parents lifetime it's been the same. EVERY DAY, EVERY HOUR. WARS.
You can talk about monetary usury all the day long, like you think you have found the golden goose, but you are still missing the point. Government is Immoral, start -fin.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith in a controlled-quantity, debt-free money system, the cost of doling out foreign aid and maintaining standing armies and conflicts around the planet would be felt immediately and thus would be voted down. so, usury banking is public enemy #1 and our chief aim should be recovering the money power from them.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Voted down by whom? No Congressman has ever voted down a war, except Ron Paul. Lincoln printed tons of money to pay for the Civil War and instituted the first draft. Just because govt controls the money does not make it inflation or usuary proof . 'You are so hopelessly dependent on the system, you will fight to protect it'. You actually believe govt serves you, and cannot see the tyranny, while I DO see the $ argument you flay like a dead horse.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith they vote for spending resolutions in support of war b/c it's paid for by unlimited credit from usury bankers, not our taxes. money is inflation and usury-proof when government controls it. counterfeiting laws would apply against banks that loan out more money than they actually have. only govt issues the money, debt-free, doesn't borrow from private banks, and controls its quantity to achieve full employment and economic stability.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Fer fucks sake! I understand money, You do not understand government. The smallest government , no matter what system, through prosperity, will always grow into the largest- as parasites on good , hot shit multiply. The voters will always vote themselves FREE SHIT, A gun to the head of all others in a Democracy.
You are like some evangelist that thinks they have the ONE TRUE JESUS, but you are simply an annoying gnat.
Just because you repeat and over repeat does not make it true.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith money and government are inseparable. government is required to regulate money as a public utility, otherwise it leads to plutocracy and serfdom. government should spend the money into the economy, not give it away. after all, money is a receipt for labor. there's plenty of work to be done and plenty of able workers, all we need is the money to make it happen!!
sozfan1 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith however, i do believe in libertarianism with meaningful monetary reform, as Bill Still advocates, in addition to the idea of state/municipal banks that employ fractional reserve lending for the public good. libertarianism w/o monetary reform is a fool's errand--it plays into the hands of predatory institutions that govt is supposed to protect us from in the first place.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 perhaps that's why the Rockerfeller's fund von Mises
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Government is NEVER on your side. See George Carlin: They don't give a Fuck about you! DO NOT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOU! More people should get it. They just steal more from others to give up to Mob demand, impoverishing everyone in the process. They are leeches and do nothing good and should be eliminated. Government is Immoral and the sooner we see that argument the better off we shall be.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith government is the whole point of the american experiment...without it we'd be dominated by the powers that be: foreign powers, private banks and corporations.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 Ummn, I suppose you dont know who runs this country? We ARE dominated by all those forces, with government collusion. Think deeper, read deeper.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith hence the occupy wall street protests
sozfan1 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith vote Bill Still for President: see still2012 [dot] com and watch his award-winning documentary, "Secret of Oz" (bottom of page). usury banking is behind it all--we simply need to take the money power back and stop borrowing.
sozfan1 3 months ago
@sozfan1 I know the Secret of OZ, but this is not about usury and nothing is 'We simply need too.'....Of course Ending the Fed would be a huge start to ending monetary corruption.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith it's entirely about usury banking--the monopoly power to counterfeit the national currency and issue it as debt w/ unpayable interest for one's own gain. in order to believe that nothing is "we simply need to.." we simply need to believe that nothing is "we simply need to..."--circular reasoning. ending the fed w/o ending govt debt and fractional reserve lending (aka usury) accomplished nothing (per M. Friedman).
sozfan1 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith libertarianism isn't possible w/o monetary reform
sozfan1 3 months ago
the purpose of government is to protect individuals from those more powerful, not to protect people from themselves--that's called a nanny-state! in fact, nanny-states often wind up protecting those more powerful from individuals, which is were we are today. upside-down. occupy, indeed.
sozfan1 3 months ago
OMG, theres so much here it could take an essay. British MA decided that schizo's were attributed to MJ use, WHEN? 1901? What part of the Constitution ever said the government could control health and welfare? Plus..he talks about 51 % rule, which if we actually HAD it, MJ would have been legalized a long time ago. Adding to that, it was never a H&W issue, it was Dow chemical and a false flag about Mexicans.
Uninformed!
There's more but...fuck, simply can't ....500 characters does not cover.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
Wow, you should have told this creepy bastard to fuck off...
24theprodigy 3 months ago
Give me the Tyranny of the Majority over the Tyranny of the minorities any day.
It's the minorities who control your country and the world now. They are responsible for the war, poverty and division in the world. Your constitution (created by a minority) could not stop it. If the majority did rule and we assume they would be tyrants too, at least it would only be a minority who would be powerless.
therealbradburns 3 months ago
@therealbradburns Interesting point. One of the only original, well thought out ones in these commentaries. Mob rule is NOT a good system. We need to become individuals and free ourselves from all systems that propose a tyranny over others by force. Democracy,( Mobocracy), Republic, Socialism and Communism are all systems by force. Voluntarism is the only evolved solution against slavery from force of will. The Constitution is also flawed as it can be changed by the mob. Don't stick to it.
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith Thanks for your reply. I like the idea of a pure/direct democracy because it is a realistic option that we can do now that could take the power away from the minority groups and give it back to the people. I believe that if given the option, mankind will choose peace and fairness instead of tyranny and that a direct democracy will naturally evolve into a Voluntarism system. It is the minority groups that have to use tyranny to keep their power.
therealbradburns 3 months ago
@therealbradburns How is taking away the power of the minority groups giving back power to 'the people'? You mean the dominant majority? While I was with you at first, I cannot agree now. You are twisting the argument, and I suspect your motive at this point. I do not believe in Democracy (mob rule). I am about Total Personal Freedom. I agree that ONE DAY people might choose Liberty over Tyranny, but until, they SEE the TYRANNY, which they dont now, that day is long in the future. I disagree w/U
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
@SonjaSmith I don't mean to be twisting anything, my motive is to share my point of view which is that the rule of the dominant majority would be better than the current minority rule. I am trying to understand your point of view too. I would love for us to all have total personal freedom. What do you think is the west way to move towards a society like that?
therealbradburns 3 months ago
@therealbradburns Well, my first thought is to hang all traitors past and present on the WH lawn for all to see, and tell Congress to go home and STOP doing whatever Bullshit they think they are doing and get a real job, but that is not very practical is it?
SonjaSmith 3 months ago
at 7:11, that is a strait up false statement. I don't where this douche gets his facts but he should check again.
andersonm1975 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
“If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.”
Thomas Jefferson
iTellYouNoLie 3 months ago in playlist More videos from AdamKokesh
Oh my gosh, give that dude a joint - I hear it helps with "hissy fits".
BRAVO Adam !
DianeDi 3 months ago 3
lol! this "conservative" is a fucking whackjob!
1dabirdman 3 months ago
You next?? ha
Frostyundercarriage 3 months ago
What a DOUCHE! Why do you care what others do. I can't believe WE LET people be this creepy. Let's stop that!!!!
PleasureCaddy 3 months ago
Guys a cunt. And creepy. And weak.
vestavixmgs 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bwhaha.. "are you next??"
YoureGoingDownFed 3 months ago
@7:23 "..you don't care about ...freedom?" "No, I don't" that should be all you need to know. btw.... @5:43 i had a flashback to elementary school when the nerdiest kid wouldn't get his way at the science fair and would start jumping straight up and down while flailing his hands around... lol (busted)
YoureGoingDownFed 3 months ago
Since it really can be interpreted in several different ways, the constitution is not really that good of an argument.
myusernameisluc 3 months ago
"The collective." What is he? A fuck bee?
SeamusLight93 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
waaaahhh! You interupted me! Mommy said you can't interrupt me!
dataphreak 3 months ago 22
another braindead fool, who obeys any man made law even if its wrong and even if it conflicts with common sense, its cause of people like this that the world its in the state that it is.
AHAH1010 3 months ago
you can also make this argument a 1st amendment type issue. The Government doesn't have the right to tell me what personal habits I practice in the same way they can't tell me what spiritual beliefs I practice.
Gamabyu 3 months ago
THIS GUY IS AN IDIOT AND TRYING TO TWIST WHAT WE ARE ACTUALLY SUPPOSE TO HAVE FOR GOV.THE FOUNDERS DESPISED DEMOCRACY.AND HE IS TWISTING THE CONSTITUTION
purpatriot78 3 months ago
Fundamental human rights trump all laws.
cyanideisabitterpill 3 months ago
"Real liberty is never found in despotism or in the extremes of Democracy." — Alexander Hamilton
unite4peaceonearth 3 months ago
What.....the....fuck.....
OCassassin 3 months ago
But it is what it is, everyone has different opinions even though he was correct on some issues, he was still in grey area on the others.
kalvin6996 3 months ago
Adam is redefining the political debate in our country. Effing love it!!
thane17 3 months ago
The people suck, fuck hope! Boy do we got some dumb mother fuckers floating around in this country! Sad thing is the illogical people are the majority!
kalvin6996 3 months ago