gotta tell ya, the camera guy is a punk ass that needs to be hammered in the ass in JAIL..!!!!! phtographs of persons and structures is illegal once the other person declines to allow that person to fotograph him / her., to continue constitutes harrasment / provocation and when convicted on it, can face a max sentence of 1 year in the county jail......ASSHOLE..!!!!!
legal or not aside, there is one thing that is more important than the law and that's RESPECT. being up in people's faces with your camera or ihpone etc is completely disrespectful, of course it's an easy way for losers to feel some form of empowerment but if it comes at the cost of people's privacy. this isn't a freedom you should exploit, shame on you. you think you're safe because you'll 'put it on Youtube otherwise' ...keep it up and one day someone's gonna lose it and go to town on you.
If it is in a public place, you can tape or take photos all you want. The thing is, you just don't identify who the subject is. I am a photographer. Now, if some one were to come up to me and politely ask that I not take their photo, I would not take their photo any longer.
the building i work in is copyrighted you can film it but if you publish that film (er youtube) then you are breaking copyright laws but thats in the uk it might be diffrent there
Only an asshole would have complete disregard for private property rights. How would you like it if I came to your house and took a shit at your front door? Fucking truck.
The guy recording is a fucking idiot, its private property if someone jumped into your backgarden and started recording your family would it be the same thing? Give the girl a break shes just doin her job. I can't imagine you'd like a camera shoved in your face when your in work. Go do something creative with your camera and stop wrecking peoples day
@benfica6198 He has his right but we got ours. Learn em. Ur free until u bother others. Same reason y u can't max ur stero at night or curse at a cop, try it n learn ur shit
@MegaLotusEater he wasn't in front of a shopping centre he was standing in front of an office building which was privately owned. He was tring to give them a hard time. You can compare this to skaters in a parking lot They aren't hurting anyone but if it isn't on public grounds u already know. If a kid was at ur door step filming you in ur living room same difference. Ur parents wouldn't have tht
Point black he wasnt on public grounds n the chic goes as far as to state tht peep were uncomfortable wit it. I would be too. She's in the right n only getting paid to follow the rules. Job well done.
peep are so slow tring to defend this dude filming on private grounds... shit let me caught a guy in the park filming my kid running around n playin and id be on the news being put in the backseat of a cop car. tourism is one thing but like he said, hes in america and and theres always tourists filming.he isnt a tourist and was looking for trouble.
@benfica6198 You're all missing the point. The issue here has nothing to do what the law IS. It's about what the law SHOULD BE i.e. why should it be that an individual cannot harmlessly film in a shopping centre open to the public? The owner of the shopping centre should not be allowed to prevent such innocent conduct in a free country. That's the point the film maker is trying to make here (whether or not he's annoying is totally irrelevant)
It is private property that is generally open to the public like a shopping mall. It would be an interesting case. I think that it is 50/50 that the courts would enforce the law.
Can we please clearly distinguish the difference between public & private property. All the supportive arguments about filming in public are valid when you are on public property. All those arguments go out the window when you are on private property which the shopping center is. John Longenecker makes himself look very ignorant in this film.
The key issue here is where the "PRIVATE PROPERTY" area is and if you are on it. Although you may feel you can video-record anywhere, simply stated, you cannot. You have to respect the wishes of those on private property just like you want others to respect YOU in certain conditions.
So simply walk a few inches off-property and you can record all you want, just not while you are physically on THEIR property.
I swear to God, I can't understand WHY this is so hard for some people to understand...
I understand what this guy was trying to do in making a point in how he views his rights to film, but honestly, with his personality, if these roles were reversed and he was in her place. He seems like the kind of person who'd lose his temper and be a dick even more so than this lady was, which personally I think she handled him very well without losing her temper. If this was his job to tell people not to film, I seriously doubt he would have been as polite about the situation.
but the light that she bounced off her body was in public property (which was then received into the camera lens). same reason why you can film private property while standing in public property. anything they display on the outside of their building is thrust into the public space by light waves. that's just physics!!
Camaras are for public use anywhere, when you are on private property and it has been stated that it is not permitted or desired then you don't film. Same goes for if someone doesn't want to be on camara no matter where they are. STOP HARRASSING PEOPLE
Just because the building doesn't have high gates in front of it doesn't mean it's not private property. It aslo cleary stated where you could film, and that filming was prohibited in the vaccinity of the property. Private property dosent also need to have fences and steel gates around it to make it private. I understood you asking why you couldn't film..but the lady was willing to explain to you and you acted like an arrogant douchbag. Respect to her for not losing her temper with you.
The idiot in this video is the reason why we photographer and videographers have such problems. It's morons like you who think you can flout the law and not have to face the repercussions. Moreover, if someone politely asks you to stop filming them then what purpose is served by your continued filming? Stay off private property and if someone asks you nicely to not film them quit being a douche.
police are made off ppl who cant find work.....basically jobless pricks join the police,,,,
I mean who really wanted to be a copper!!!!! when all options in life fail, times are hard you need money , ppl join the police.....well that what i think anyway
I totally beleive in a photographers rights! BUT!!!! Not on Private property, if you are asked to not take pictures on private property please do not give all us other photographers a bad name like this, repect the rights of the property owners or their delegates and move to where it is public property and then snap away my friend. But you do not have the right to take pictures anywhere and everywhere you want. Only on PUBLIC property do you have that right!!!!!
the guy with the camrea is wrong you cant video tape unless you have permission when its on private proprtey just like if someone went in your home and video taped you you can video tape if its public proprtey
@TF1Bandit Not meaning to bash you but you are only partially correct. IF he is standing on public property & using a 'normal' lens, then he has a right to film 'anything.' In your home, you have absolute expectation of privacy; however, just as an example, if you were in your home-with your windows completely open, he could theoretically stand on the sidewalk and film you. Don't scream at me-I'm not saying it would be right only legal. The public is mostly ignorant about 'rights'
@MajorRick12345 its ok i dont get into arguments on youtube but thats why i said if some one came to your home like steped inside and video taped you then you can do something about it
@TF1Bandit just want to say one last comment. It is rather refreshing to actually see a rational person on one of these sites. I sincerely try to 'educate' some people on here because I strongly believe we are losing our rights and unfortunately there are too many people that are unaware of what they truly can or cannot do. Have a great day
I hope someone can film you when you don't want it and put it on YouTube go film a fast-food employee serving fries and put it on YouTube same thing she is just doing a job
So in other words someone could sue you for posting their images on youtube. there are lot of videos on youtube like this one like the worldisraw video about the San Diego trolley and security guards.
I think we need to protect our rights but we also need to protect PRIVATE property rights as well. You were on private property and they made you aware of it. How about I come to your house and start filming? Also you would need permission of every person you filmed while on private property to air your video. You profited from the video and therefore as much as it sickens me, you broke the law. Please try and respect others rights so those of us that want to exercise our rights dont look like u
@PictureAmerica why u gotta be a dick with that lady she just trying to do her job like any other AMERICAN. I understand what u are trying to get at but it dont give u the right to fuck up her day with your delicate issues.
@Sharebpaxtyl3 "She can sue you for posting her image on the internet." - No, she can't. She would need to show tort. I.e- that the poster had a legal obligation not to post the video (he had no such obligation), or posted it in such a way that was misrepresentative, AND that the posting of the video directly caused her some form of UNDUE loss, damage or other harm. From the looks of the video, fulfilling that criteria would seem to be a practical impossibility.
so if iwalkin down the block wit my child and saw this creep wit a recorder filmin us do we not have the right to stop this person. yes he has the right to freely record but dont the peep hes recording have the right to not get filmied witout their consent
@benfica6198 "yes he has the right to freely record but dont the peep hes recording have the right to not get filmied witout their consent" - No. If you're out in public, you have no such right. If you, of your own free will, choose to go out into public, you lose any "reasonable expectation of privacy". If you don't want to be filmed, the legal onus is on you to either move to an area where you do have a reasonable expectation of privacy, or to obscure your face somehow.
guys please be nicer to the cops, u all think ure so smart when u make such a hard time for someone in the middle of doing their job, when they dont even make up the rules they just enforce them. and i bet if it was a big ass beefy dude u wouldnt have made as much of a problem as with this poor police woman
@Jcolinsol They do what they're told by their superiors, just like you do at your job, i do at my job and everyone in the world has to do. if you have a problem with the police, dont take it up with the police, take it up with your government or move the fck out of your country. If a big dude assrapes u in an alley, u gonna be all fck the police then? :p
Heh heh. Right, that'll work, I'll just go vote on it, that'll really change things when I'm getting illegally searched by repressed homosexual cop. That makes total sense.
I own land here, there's no reason I should have to leave, just to avoid getting fucked with by fascists. Or did you forget that this is supposed to be a free country?
@Jcolinsol rofl dude, i admit it's hard to get the attention of the government no matter what country you're from. but still ITS NOT THE COPS THAT MAKE THE RULES, THEY JUST HAVE TO ENFORCE THEM. the reason everyone gets pissed off at the police is because they get fcked by them all the time, but thats just their job, dont give the officers a hard time, they're just entry level workers doing what theyre told to do. and hey if you've had a bad experience with a police officer, report them.
Yeah, I think most people are pretty sick of the police, at least when they see the berries n' cherries in their rearview. But, I can't just let them off the hook as if they are only following orders. For one, they shouldn't just follow orders, that kind of mindlessness has no place in resolving violence in the community. Cops need to be context sensitive. For another, most cops enjoy playing this authoritarian little role, it's sick.
The problem is, reporting them wont accomplish jack shit. I mean, cops commit rapes and murders and never get prosecuted, punished, or fired, do you think anythings really gonna get done over some minor shit like an illegal search? You have to remember, the city hires the police, they are on the same side. The legal system is inherently biased towards maintaining their authority. This means that the police ain't hear to protect us, they are here to protect the government. Lame.
@Jcolinsol ofcourse its a biased system, but its been like that since the beginning of established society lol. there have always been soldiers and guards keeping civilians in their place. It can suck because you'll never be able to just live without having to pay taxes and bills. We cant just do what we want in this world. But think how life would be if we could. It would be anarchy, your life would depend on your strength and what weapons you have rather than your brains. thas no way to live
Well, we could live without taxes and bullies, if we decided to.
Personally, I would prefer Anarchy. You seem to have some rather fanciful ideas about what Anarchy would be like, seems kinda "Mad Max", which doesn't at all relate to how any actual Anarchy works, whether historical or theoretical. It's not about chaos and darwinism, it's about mutual respect and voluntarism. No one wants chaos, so why would people create chaos once they are free?
@Jcolinsol how can you live in the world you live in and think that without establishment crime wouldnt be at an alltime high. what about rapists and murderers, 10% of everyone that actually thinks about rape or murder does it, the other 90% think... naah i wont do that coz ill get arrested. thatll be fckin great wont it, the world will turn into the ghetto if you ask me, believe me id like it your way, but i dont see it as a possibility
Well, there would still be negative reinforcement, even if there were no government. You could hire private police, or my preference, volunteer police, and historical Anarchies had private courts to prosecute criminals.
Only a small proportion of society is inclined to violence, most people aren't criminals, and violent crime is psychologically motivated so the solution is better support for mothers and children, not violently enforced governments.
the security guards are just doing their job, stop harassing them. THIS IS AMERICA... so? its someones private property and they don't want you filming.... how would you like it if i came to your house and started filming you? you are breaking the same laws that you want authorities to uphold and respect... stop being a hypocrite and do something productive with your time.... volunteer and a homeless shelter or food bank etc if you have that much time.
you're just an instigator. all you do is go around filming police and security guards and purposely try to push their buttons until you get the right reaction, edit the rest and put this on so you look like you're the calm collected one and all law enforcement are assholes. GET A JOB and if you have one GET A DIFFERENT HOBBY! you're one step away from filming at a funeral and when the widowed wife asks you to stop you start spewing your liberal shit about how you have the right.
somebody slap that fat-arse skagrat fascist bitch good looking. she's uncomfortable with a camera in her dog's dinner of a face because she may see herself in a newspaper & turn to stone, the malformed nazi gorgon that she is. her time would be better spent on a treadmill burning off some of those tons of gluttony she's carrying about. i can't believe ten-ton tessa there hasn't had a fekn heart attack yet, more's the pity. someone needs to tell her to throw up. jupiter wants it's moon back.
It's the same as a private yard. Except no fence and signs hard to read, plus they expect people to enter their property with ease. Fail on both sides
the fella on the camera is talking shite - even in public, if somebody doesn't want thier photo taking, then it's thier right.............you can't stop it, but it's thier right - or it is here anyway
to be fair to that lady guard, she kept her cool at your childish questioning, i'd have probably come back with a witty response such as 'stop being a clever cunt and fuck off before i nut you'
The guy with the camera is a complete JERKOFF... why not leave the guards alone and stop embarrasing people...no wonder we have so many problems in society with wise guys and no there isn't filming on private property with our owners permission and he was on private property. Stay on sidewalk on public property and there would be no problem. Typical sidewalk lawyer...
This video isn't proving anything its just showing a guy being VERY disrespectful to other people who are asking him not to film their faces and he's saying you still can. Which is wrong. Without someones constent it is ILLEGAL to film their face. Esspecially if it is later being put onto the internet. Also...there IS a sign stating he WAS on private property so it IS therefore ILLEGAL to film wherever he wants.
IF he was standing OFF the property and could still see the property from where he was standing that is different. But since he was ON private property and shooting faces he was asked specifically not to...it's not legal. All in all...this video proves nothing and is a good example of how to be a disrespectful jerk to a police officer kindly trying to explain the rules.
I love how you give someone a little metal bage and a name tag and not only ate they the new sheriff in town, but they become lawyers. By filming you were not doing either of the things on that little sight. FilmIng is not soliciting. She's just stupid.
If for example I was in a public place shooting video and you were in the way, and I made my best effort to keep you out of it, it wouldn't justify assault - and yes, I am probably more than capable of shoving your own head up your ass, though I wish to avoid such circumstances.
Its true as long as you basically tell some one your recording or taking a picture if they don't leave then you have a right to record or take a picture
blah blah blah what an obnoxious prick !! obviously suffering from little person syndrome. if you were pointing a camera in my face and i asked you to stop and you did'nt, id spark you one !
OMG, how stupid. You can't film in public? Since when? She is an idiot and an emberasment. You have all rights to do so, I was a Security Officer, now Law Enforcement and if we can't fine or bust the Paparazzi for what they do, that should tell ya. The private property part is another story
Picture America, stop spreading your lies about the U.K. being unlawful about taking pictures. im about to become a very police officer in the uk, and i can confirm it is not illegal whatsoever to film in a public place, no matter who it is.
Dont talk nonsense, its only illegal if your basically inside an area of secrecy to take photos or unauthorised non-public places... I can film in the middle of the street anybody with no risk and within the law...
I would be skeptical about wikipedia, but not as outright fearful as people who erroneously associate the ability to edit with people therefore automatically doing so - and the association with ability to edit with all edits being inaccurate.
It is intellectually dishonest since Wikipedia - according to a recent study is on par with the likes of Encyclopedia Brittannica in terms of accuracy.
Though I don't actually cite Wikipedia - I use and cite the sources they use
As of February 16, 2009, in Great Britain / UK it became unlawful for a tourist or a photojournalist or a TV video crew to photograph or record a video that includes an image of any law enforcement officer under UK Section 76 Counter-Terrorism Act 2008.
Amazing! Frightening!
I enjoy taking photos and recording video in public spaces all across America. We ought to protect that right here in the USA. Note: I shot this KODAK MOMENT video for PictureAmerica - JOHN LONGENECKER, DGA
Section 76 of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 - February 2009 - stop and search powers and limits on photography in public space have extended further. Section 76 permits the arrest of anyone found eliciting, publishing or communicating information relating to members of the armed forces, intelligence services and police officers, which is likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism. Photographing a cop can land you a fine or even a 10-year prison sentence.
@PictureAmerica Only if they can prove you intend to use the footage for terrorist reasons and after they have sited that they are stopping you under section 44 of the anti terror laws, they can prove that you got more to worry about than than a fine or even a ten year sentence. If you photograph or film police during their duties in a public space you can not be punished. Police are using the section 44 laws irresponsibly but are under instructions to use it sparingly, even if individuals dont.
An act, statute or code is not law. An act is given a force of law with the consent of the governed (that is you and me). The act you quote may make filming illegal, but not unlawful. There is a great diffrenece between illegal and unlawful - study "FMOTL". As long as you are not breaking the law i.e. committing a crime, you are OK and can sue the fuck out of anyone that restricts your rights. As for what constitutes crime, google what are the elements of a crime.
@PictureAmerica thats the point word (TERRORISM) if they do not suspect you of it they won't search you - if you are going round taking photos of police and security areas or outside sensitive locations expect someone to ask you questions - if you are doing nothing wrong what do you have to worry about.
@PictureAmerica You can film anything you want in the uk to a certain extent....like everywhere else in the world.
If your in a public place then you can film whomever or whatever you like.
Police may tell you that you cant because of that ACT you just mentioned....but they need REASONABLE grounds to suspect you are planning a terrorist attack or are gaining the information for terrorist purposes.
It not as bad as this guy makes out look at all the 2010 vids of police etc on youtbe. THOUSANDS
it just says no solicitation or distribution..smacks of paranoia to me. If Joe public took a picture there then she probably wouldn't even notice, but coz the guy probably has a pro camera..OH MY GOD!!!. The tiny sign in the road is a bit pathetic, I mean what is he photographing..If its that sensitive it should be behind a wall..
first of all the security guard is a IDIOT.if it were private property it would have been posted or announced.
2.the paranoia of america is an all time high people using 911 as an excuse for being stupid.
if it were private property why the hell is it in a PUBLIC area. IDIOT.well when they were hiring pigs they sure did hire some one who looked the part didn't they what a boars-head bitch.Keep that film ROLLING!!
It is private property. Thay have that here in NYC too. They have a little marker in the ground you've probably noticed. You have to be on the public sidewalk. They can only ask you to leave
There at 2:43 you see it. But she's wrong about taking anybody's pic. If you go outside the line, you can still film inside the line as long as you can see it from the public sidewalk.
I know, they tried to kick my ass daily for 20 years in NYC for this when I was a crime scene cameraman for the papers
Security guards are ALL clueless! It's a prerequisite to be clueless, and they test your ability to be clueless before giving you the honors of wearing their plastic badge!
As a matter of fact, even if you are on private property, but in a public space, like a street, mall or train station, you are permitted by law to take photos if you do not interfere with certain things, like blocking the way of people. If you bought a ticket to enter that space, they can't accuse you of trespassing, but even if they do accuse, they NEVER have the right to confiscate your equipment or make you delete images.
Best thing to do in these situations - Tell them to call the Police.
i would like to comment on what you have said - they never have the right to confiscate your equiptment or make you delete the images - i agree with you, they do not have the right to confiscate your equiptment, but do have the right to ask you to delete the image if they are init or even edit them out of it, as of filming they can ask you to stop filming them.
And don't even think of playing the "your just an internet tough guy" card - it is a crutch that has some merits, but is used to mask one's ignorance about how bad an idea they had in regards to confronting somebody is.
gotta tell ya, the camera guy is a punk ass that needs to be hammered in the ass in JAIL..!!!!! phtographs of persons and structures is illegal once the other person declines to allow that person to fotograph him / her., to continue constitutes harrasment / provocation and when convicted on it, can face a max sentence of 1 year in the county jail......ASSHOLE..!!!!!
gotyurfugginassnow 22 hours ago
legal or not aside, there is one thing that is more important than the law and that's RESPECT. being up in people's faces with your camera or ihpone etc is completely disrespectful, of course it's an easy way for losers to feel some form of empowerment but if it comes at the cost of people's privacy. this isn't a freedom you should exploit, shame on you. you think you're safe because you'll 'put it on Youtube otherwise' ...keep it up and one day someone's gonna lose it and go to town on you.
heirihunziker 1 day ago
Kodak is bankrupt.... wonder if they protect their named theater now? Really makes me want to go on vacation to Calif.... NOT
melaphonedad 1 day ago
If it is in a public place, you can tape or take photos all you want. The thing is, you just don't identify who the subject is. I am a photographer. Now, if some one were to come up to me and politely ask that I not take their photo, I would not take their photo any longer.
MrTuck53 1 day ago
Oh piss on Hollywood and all their bullshit.
TheChuck624 3 days ago
put her back in mexico
petechef27nj 4 days ago
lard ass - no self respect for herself
fl3162 6 days ago
someone should go to this idiots backyard and film him taking a shit.
fourlokoJoker 6 days ago
the building i work in is copyrighted you can film it but if you publish that film (er youtube) then you are breaking copyright laws but thats in the uk it might be diffrent there
bledfrogs 1 week ago
Only an asshole would have complete disregard for private property rights. How would you like it if I came to your house and took a shit at your front door? Fucking truck.
InspctrClouseau 1 week ago
Complete disrespect to these security guards who are just doing their jobs. Such a nice lady.
GracieTriangle1 1 week ago
The guy recording is a fucking idiot, its private property if someone jumped into your backgarden and started recording your family would it be the same thing? Give the girl a break shes just doin her job. I can't imagine you'd like a camera shoved in your face when your in work. Go do something creative with your camera and stop wrecking peoples day
shaunobeirne 1 week ago
no excuse for obesity
fl3162 2 weeks ago
@fl3162 oi leave it out the camera adds 10lbs (he just had a few cameras on him)
bledfrogs 1 week ago
you should of said "i will censor your face" then she would not be insane
handango98 2 weeks ago
Wow that guy is a fucking dubmass.
CFresco1332 3 weeks ago
You are arguing with the wrong person you prick.........do either of those gooks look like they make the law in the U.S?
BazzerObama 1 month ago
Another tool claiming his "Rights are being violated!" when he somehow had a problem with me being in his house filming him.
NoOneSpecial72 1 month ago 2
@benfica6198 He has his right but we got ours. Learn em. Ur free until u bother others. Same reason y u can't max ur stero at night or curse at a cop, try it n learn ur shit
benfica6198 1 month ago
@MegaLotusEater he wasn't in front of a shopping centre he was standing in front of an office building which was privately owned. He was tring to give them a hard time. You can compare this to skaters in a parking lot They aren't hurting anyone but if it isn't on public grounds u already know. If a kid was at ur door step filming you in ur living room same difference. Ur parents wouldn't have tht
benfica6198 1 month ago
Point black he wasnt on public grounds n the chic goes as far as to state tht peep were uncomfortable wit it. I would be too. She's in the right n only getting paid to follow the rules. Job well done.
benfica6198 1 month ago
@MegaLotusEater n u were in this guys head?
benfica6198 1 month ago
peep are so slow tring to defend this dude filming on private grounds... shit let me caught a guy in the park filming my kid running around n playin and id be on the news being put in the backseat of a cop car. tourism is one thing but like he said, hes in america and and theres always tourists filming.he isnt a tourist and was looking for trouble.
benfica6198 1 month ago
@benfica6198 You're all missing the point. The issue here has nothing to do what the law IS. It's about what the law SHOULD BE i.e. why should it be that an individual cannot harmlessly film in a shopping centre open to the public? The owner of the shopping centre should not be allowed to prevent such innocent conduct in a free country. That's the point the film maker is trying to make here (whether or not he's annoying is totally irrelevant)
MegaLotusEater 1 month ago
It is private property that is generally open to the public like a shopping mall. It would be an interesting case. I think that it is 50/50 that the courts would enforce the law.
rickjones53 1 month ago
Can we please clearly distinguish the difference between public & private property. All the supportive arguments about filming in public are valid when you are on public property. All those arguments go out the window when you are on private property which the shopping center is. John Longenecker makes himself look very ignorant in this film.
Toni5776 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The key issue here is where the "PRIVATE PROPERTY" area is and if you are on it. Although you may feel you can video-record anywhere, simply stated, you cannot. You have to respect the wishes of those on private property just like you want others to respect YOU in certain conditions.
So simply walk a few inches off-property and you can record all you want, just not while you are physically on THEIR property.
I swear to God, I can't understand WHY this is so hard for some people to understand...
thebakerman1 1 month ago
Comment removed
thebakerman1 1 month ago
The guy operating the camera is a complete fucking idiot!
Ammobarer 1 month ago 15
u should of filmed across the street.lol
haverick23 1 month ago
I understand what this guy was trying to do in making a point in how he views his rights to film, but honestly, with his personality, if these roles were reversed and he was in her place. He seems like the kind of person who'd lose his temper and be a dick even more so than this lady was, which personally I think she handled him very well without losing her temper. If this was his job to tell people not to film, I seriously doubt he would have been as polite about the situation.
KingTreeFrog 1 month ago
This young lady who speaks English with a foreign accent seems to be ignorant of the applicable law. This is obviously harrassment.
rickjones53 1 month ago
@rickjones53 You may want to look up the law cause she is 100% right. It's private property and they can make up the rules.
Toni5776 1 month ago
Many of these police departments do not have weight requirements not to mention height requirements.
rickjones53 1 month ago
but the light that she bounced off her body was in public property (which was then received into the camera lens). same reason why you can film private property while standing in public property. anything they display on the outside of their building is thrust into the public space by light waves. that's just physics!!
SanguineBullet667 1 month ago
@SanguineBullet667 Try that argument when filming across from a bank or federal building. Won't work, can't film. Sorry
Toni5776 1 month ago
@Toni5776 I know but in reality they are invading the space of the public so long as they don't have a giant black wall around their building.
SanguineBullet667 1 month ago
Camaras are for public use anywhere, when you are on private property and it has been stated that it is not permitted or desired then you don't film. Same goes for if someone doesn't want to be on camara no matter where they are. STOP HARRASSING PEOPLE
dcthegreatest24 1 month ago
Just because the building doesn't have high gates in front of it doesn't mean it's not private property. It aslo cleary stated where you could film, and that filming was prohibited in the vaccinity of the property. Private property dosent also need to have fences and steel gates around it to make it private. I understood you asking why you couldn't film..but the lady was willing to explain to you and you acted like an arrogant douchbag. Respect to her for not losing her temper with you.
vandegevel1 1 month ago
The idiot in this video is the reason why we photographer and videographers have such problems. It's morons like you who think you can flout the law and not have to face the repercussions. Moreover, if someone politely asks you to stop filming them then what purpose is served by your continued filming? Stay off private property and if someone asks you nicely to not film them quit being a douche.
KamekoBruns 1 month ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
police are made off ppl who cant find work.....basically jobless pricks join the police,,,,
I mean who really wanted to be a copper!!!!! when all options in life fail, times are hard you need money , ppl join the police.....well that what i think anyway
P14YCR 2 months ago
I totally beleive in a photographers rights! BUT!!!! Not on Private property, if you are asked to not take pictures on private property please do not give all us other photographers a bad name like this, repect the rights of the property owners or their delegates and move to where it is public property and then snap away my friend. But you do not have the right to take pictures anywhere and everywhere you want. Only on PUBLIC property do you have that right!!!!!
lorddennis1 2 months ago 2
the guy with the camrea is wrong you cant video tape unless you have permission when its on private proprtey just like if someone went in your home and video taped you you can video tape if its public proprtey
TF1Bandit 2 months ago 12
@TF1Bandit if i was a cop and someone asked too film me i would say yes and even if they didnt ask i would not care .
MegaAjax01 1 month ago
@TF1Bandit Not meaning to bash you but you are only partially correct. IF he is standing on public property & using a 'normal' lens, then he has a right to film 'anything.' In your home, you have absolute expectation of privacy; however, just as an example, if you were in your home-with your windows completely open, he could theoretically stand on the sidewalk and film you. Don't scream at me-I'm not saying it would be right only legal. The public is mostly ignorant about 'rights'
MajorRick12345 3 weeks ago
@MajorRick12345 its ok i dont get into arguments on youtube but thats why i said if some one came to your home like steped inside and video taped you then you can do something about it
TF1Bandit 3 weeks ago
@TF1Bandit just want to say one last comment. It is rather refreshing to actually see a rational person on one of these sites. I sincerely try to 'educate' some people on here because I strongly believe we are losing our rights and unfortunately there are too many people that are unaware of what they truly can or cannot do. Have a great day
MajorRick12345 3 weeks ago
@MajorRick12345 same to you
TF1Bandit 3 weeks ago
i was walking all around filming there and no one bugged me
and not only that but that is Hollywood they want you to take photos and yes
you can film any where you want of anything , she is dead wrong
rigomortisfxstudios 2 months ago
It seems that what this is all about is photography and video rights.
Doug62Y 2 months ago
Maybe you should do a documentary about this, not about the woman or the location but about photography and video rights.
Doug62Y 2 months ago
I hope someone can film you when you don't want it and put it on YouTube go film a fast-food employee serving fries and put it on YouTube same thing she is just doing a job
jburn45acp 3 months ago
You're an asshole for filming where you weren't supposed to and then putting it on YouTube.
rachiearm92 3 months ago
i would screw that bbw security guard.
aztek2005 4 months ago
SHE IS A BITCH. END OF STORY.
owenhinton 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Maybe you should do a documentary about this like Michael Moore.
Doug62Y 4 months ago
Maybe you should do a documentary about this like Michael Moore.
Doug62Y 4 months ago
The is youtube video by theworldisraw that deals with a similar subject about The San Diego Trolley and security guards.
Doug62Y 4 months ago
So in other words someone could sue you for posting their images on youtube. there are lot of videos on youtube like this one like the worldisraw video about the San Diego trolley and security guards.
Doug62Y 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The same thing happened to me outside the NBC building in San Diego.
Doug62Y 4 months ago
I think we need to protect our rights but we also need to protect PRIVATE property rights as well. You were on private property and they made you aware of it. How about I come to your house and start filming? Also you would need permission of every person you filmed while on private property to air your video. You profited from the video and therefore as much as it sickens me, you broke the law. Please try and respect others rights so those of us that want to exercise our rights dont look like u
thegbpackers284 4 months ago
I like how the guy says "What are the penalties?" at around 2:10.
I'm not sure why, but hearing him say it sounds like he's the type of guy I can trust.
gorillaMaticIAP 4 months ago
@PictureAmerica why u gotta be a dick with that lady she just trying to do her job like any other AMERICAN. I understand what u are trying to get at but it dont give u the right to fuck up her day with your delicate issues.
StreetFightingDude 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
She can sue you for posting her image on the internet.
Sharebpaxtyl3 5 months ago
She can sue you for posting her image on the internet.
Sharebpaxtyl3 5 months ago
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
@Sharebpaxtyl3
Not if she is a public servant!
fmnma1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sharebpaxtyl3 "She can sue you for posting her image on the internet." - No, she can't. She would need to show tort. I.e- that the poster had a legal obligation not to post the video (he had no such obligation), or posted it in such a way that was misrepresentative, AND that the posting of the video directly caused her some form of UNDUE loss, damage or other harm. From the looks of the video, fulfilling that criteria would seem to be a practical impossibility.
BloatedSensations 1 month ago
so if iwalkin down the block wit my child and saw this creep wit a recorder filmin us do we not have the right to stop this person. yes he has the right to freely record but dont the peep hes recording have the right to not get filmied witout their consent
benfica6198 7 months ago
@benfica6198 "yes he has the right to freely record but dont the peep hes recording have the right to not get filmied witout their consent" - No. If you're out in public, you have no such right. If you, of your own free will, choose to go out into public, you lose any "reasonable expectation of privacy". If you don't want to be filmed, the legal onus is on you to either move to an area where you do have a reasonable expectation of privacy, or to obscure your face somehow.
BloatedSensations 1 month ago
Grow up. You sound like a child doing nothing more than being difficult.
rollercoastersrock 8 months ago
Way to go love this video
tonyvera1902 8 months ago
guys please be nicer to the cops, u all think ure so smart when u make such a hard time for someone in the middle of doing their job, when they dont even make up the rules they just enforce them. and i bet if it was a big ass beefy dude u wouldnt have made as much of a problem as with this poor police woman
MakeSensePlz 9 months ago
@MakeSensePlz
No, the cops should leave people alone and stop being such cryptofascist creeps.
Jcolinsol 8 months ago
@Jcolinsol They do what they're told by their superiors, just like you do at your job, i do at my job and everyone in the world has to do. if you have a problem with the police, dont take it up with the police, take it up with your government or move the fck out of your country. If a big dude assrapes u in an alley, u gonna be all fck the police then? :p
MakeSensePlz 8 months ago
@MakeSensePlz
Heh heh. Right, that'll work, I'll just go vote on it, that'll really change things when I'm getting illegally searched by repressed homosexual cop. That makes total sense.
I own land here, there's no reason I should have to leave, just to avoid getting fucked with by fascists. Or did you forget that this is supposed to be a free country?
Jcolinsol 8 months ago
@Jcolinsol rofl dude, i admit it's hard to get the attention of the government no matter what country you're from. but still ITS NOT THE COPS THAT MAKE THE RULES, THEY JUST HAVE TO ENFORCE THEM. the reason everyone gets pissed off at the police is because they get fcked by them all the time, but thats just their job, dont give the officers a hard time, they're just entry level workers doing what theyre told to do. and hey if you've had a bad experience with a police officer, report them.
MakeSensePlz 8 months ago
@MakeSensePlz '
Yeah, I think most people are pretty sick of the police, at least when they see the berries n' cherries in their rearview. But, I can't just let them off the hook as if they are only following orders. For one, they shouldn't just follow orders, that kind of mindlessness has no place in resolving violence in the community. Cops need to be context sensitive. For another, most cops enjoy playing this authoritarian little role, it's sick.
Jcolinsol 7 months ago
@MakeSensePlz
The problem is, reporting them wont accomplish jack shit. I mean, cops commit rapes and murders and never get prosecuted, punished, or fired, do you think anythings really gonna get done over some minor shit like an illegal search? You have to remember, the city hires the police, they are on the same side. The legal system is inherently biased towards maintaining their authority. This means that the police ain't hear to protect us, they are here to protect the government. Lame.
Jcolinsol 7 months ago
@Jcolinsol ofcourse its a biased system, but its been like that since the beginning of established society lol. there have always been soldiers and guards keeping civilians in their place. It can suck because you'll never be able to just live without having to pay taxes and bills. We cant just do what we want in this world. But think how life would be if we could. It would be anarchy, your life would depend on your strength and what weapons you have rather than your brains. thas no way to live
MakeSensePlz 7 months ago
@MakeSensePlz
Well, we could live without taxes and bullies, if we decided to.
Personally, I would prefer Anarchy. You seem to have some rather fanciful ideas about what Anarchy would be like, seems kinda "Mad Max", which doesn't at all relate to how any actual Anarchy works, whether historical or theoretical. It's not about chaos and darwinism, it's about mutual respect and voluntarism. No one wants chaos, so why would people create chaos once they are free?
Jcolinsol 7 months ago
@Jcolinsol how can you live in the world you live in and think that without establishment crime wouldnt be at an alltime high. what about rapists and murderers, 10% of everyone that actually thinks about rape or murder does it, the other 90% think... naah i wont do that coz ill get arrested. thatll be fckin great wont it, the world will turn into the ghetto if you ask me, believe me id like it your way, but i dont see it as a possibility
MakeSensePlz 7 months ago
@MakeSensePlz
Well, there would still be negative reinforcement, even if there were no government. You could hire private police, or my preference, volunteer police, and historical Anarchies had private courts to prosecute criminals.
Only a small proportion of society is inclined to violence, most people aren't criminals, and violent crime is psychologically motivated so the solution is better support for mothers and children, not violently enforced governments.
Jcolinsol 7 months ago
Good for you
AHurricaneProduction 9 months ago
the security guards are just doing their job, stop harassing them. THIS IS AMERICA... so? its someones private property and they don't want you filming.... how would you like it if i came to your house and started filming you? you are breaking the same laws that you want authorities to uphold and respect... stop being a hypocrite and do something productive with your time.... volunteer and a homeless shelter or food bank etc if you have that much time.
KhalsaRaj13 10 months ago
you were trespassing and being an a-hole
MrDonmichael 10 months ago
hmmm.... yes in america you can film in a PUBLIC area, but what the sign was reading was that it was a PRIVATE area.
NatePaulFilms 11 months ago
you're just an instigator. all you do is go around filming police and security guards and purposely try to push their buttons until you get the right reaction, edit the rest and put this on so you look like you're the calm collected one and all law enforcement are assholes. GET A JOB and if you have one GET A DIFFERENT HOBBY! you're one step away from filming at a funeral and when the widowed wife asks you to stop you start spewing your liberal shit about how you have the right.
slinger1632 1 year ago
the police film us but we cant film them, I DONT THINK SO!
CyclonexxxIce 1 year ago
your a twat
87Greenhorn 1 year ago
Dude... you're a fag. Get a life.
madpistol 1 year ago
your a fucking jackoff go get a life you fucking stalker.
cac1175 1 year ago
it was on private property, follow the law.
Other than that, shoot video and pictures all ya want in public.
johnnykool327 1 year ago
@johnnykool327
It is not private property but corporate property. Corporations have no authority to impose their peferences on actual human beings.
Macedon51 1 year ago
somebody slap that fat-arse skagrat fascist bitch good looking. she's uncomfortable with a camera in her dog's dinner of a face because she may see herself in a newspaper & turn to stone, the malformed nazi gorgon that she is. her time would be better spent on a treadmill burning off some of those tons of gluttony she's carrying about. i can't believe ten-ton tessa there hasn't had a fekn heart attack yet, more's the pity. someone needs to tell her to throw up. jupiter wants it's moon back.
pfalky2k 1 year ago
It's the same as a private yard. Except no fence and signs hard to read, plus they expect people to enter their property with ease. Fail on both sides
beaubicknese 1 year ago
This is clearly private property. Toss him in jail
beaubicknese 1 year ago
@beaubicknese not so clear, watch the video, it's a tiny little sign.
Mr101tech 1 year ago
the fella on the camera is talking shite - even in public, if somebody doesn't want thier photo taking, then it's thier right.............you can't stop it, but it's thier right - or it is here anyway
to be fair to that lady guard, she kept her cool at your childish questioning, i'd have probably come back with a witty response such as 'stop being a clever cunt and fuck off before i nut you'
melvinceltic 1 year ago
"even in public, if somebody doesn't want thier photo taking, then it's thier right."
[citation needed]
travelsonic 1 year ago
there were lots of other people behind her taking pictures! lol
JGTRA 1 year ago
she say that you cannot video tape wiht your OK. Look @ the news they Vieo anyone with there OK. The news BREAK the LAW more....
kennyrr 1 year ago
No, I can film just fine, but thanks for asking.
chompychomps 1 year ago
Slap that fat bitch and ricer!!
dynamicz108 1 year ago
cameramans a fag!
1is1 1 year ago
The guy with the camera is a complete JERKOFF... why not leave the guards alone and stop embarrasing people...no wonder we have so many problems in society with wise guys and no there isn't filming on private property with our owners permission and he was on private property. Stay on sidewalk on public property and there would be no problem. Typical sidewalk lawyer...
a211pc 1 year ago
This video isn't proving anything its just showing a guy being VERY disrespectful to other people who are asking him not to film their faces and he's saying you still can. Which is wrong. Without someones constent it is ILLEGAL to film their face. Esspecially if it is later being put onto the internet. Also...there IS a sign stating he WAS on private property so it IS therefore ILLEGAL to film wherever he wants.
xekes13 2 years ago
IF he was standing OFF the property and could still see the property from where he was standing that is different. But since he was ON private property and shooting faces he was asked specifically not to...it's not legal. All in all...this video proves nothing and is a good example of how to be a disrespectful jerk to a police officer kindly trying to explain the rules.
xekes13 2 years ago
I love how you give someone a little metal bage and a name tag and not only ate they the new sheriff in town, but they become lawyers. By filming you were not doing either of the things on that little sight. FilmIng is not soliciting. She's just stupid.
ck44052 2 years ago 4
If someone does not want to be filmed then that is fair enough, you should respect their wishes!
If you filmed me and I objected and you refused to stop, I'd literally shove your camera up your arse.
Simple as that.
balesy1974 2 years ago
If for example I was in a public place shooting video and you were in the way, and I made my best effort to keep you out of it, it wouldn't justify assault - and yes, I am probably more than capable of shoving your own head up your ass, though I wish to avoid such circumstances.
travelsonic 1 year ago
he on private property
tsidow2008 2 years ago
Its true as long as you basically tell some one your recording or taking a picture if they don't leave then you have a right to record or take a picture
mortie806 2 years ago
@mortie806 actually, if in public you don't even have to tell them.
jvorus 2 years ago
great stuff.....
popas7 2 years ago
blah blah blah what an obnoxious prick !! obviously suffering from little person syndrome. if you were pointing a camera in my face and i asked you to stop and you did'nt, id spark you one !
daledewison 2 years ago
@daledewison Then you would go to jail. It is not illegal to film someone or something in public.
jvorus 2 years ago
get off the property!!
rugodey 2 years ago
LOL just stand where she tells u and point the dam camera in the private propery sh says u can't filim in the property but u cna out lol
borofalcon101 2 years ago
OMG, how stupid. You can't film in public? Since when? She is an idiot and an emberasment. You have all rights to do so, I was a Security Officer, now Law Enforcement and if we can't fine or bust the Paparazzi for what they do, that should tell ya. The private property part is another story
socalkevin79 2 years ago
Picture America, stop spreading your lies about the U.K. being unlawful about taking pictures. im about to become a very police officer in the uk, and i can confirm it is not illegal whatsoever to film in a public place, no matter who it is.
lightningpete 2 years ago 9
Section 76 - Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 in the UK
Unlawful to record anything related to a police office.
Even Wikipedia has related info. Look it up.
Done deal. That's it. Stay tuned.
PictureAmerica 2 years ago
Dont talk nonsense, its only illegal if your basically inside an area of secrecy to take photos or unauthorised non-public places... I can film in the middle of the street anybody with no risk and within the law...
again, stop talking crap, we live here, you dont!
lightningpete 2 years ago
@PictureAmerica Dick Face.Half of Wikipedia is lies asshole.
gutterball92 1 year ago 2
ohh and pictureamerica, wikipedia is not a valid source of information ever... i can edit that law if i so wish...
lightningpete 2 years ago
I would be skeptical about wikipedia, but not as outright fearful as people who erroneously associate the ability to edit with people therefore automatically doing so - and the association with ability to edit with all edits being inaccurate.
It is intellectually dishonest since Wikipedia - according to a recent study is on par with the likes of Encyclopedia Brittannica in terms of accuracy.
Though I don't actually cite Wikipedia - I use and cite the sources they use
travelsonic 1 year ago
@lightningpete Dirty pig.
MegaLotusEater 4 months ago
@MegaLotusEater u wouldnt like ur kids being filmed by this guy at the park .. same shit cause he has his rights
benfica6198 1 month ago
@benfica6198 This guy is not a paedophile. He was innocently taking pictures. What's the big deal?
MegaLotusEater 1 month ago
@benfica6198
Hyperbole and strawmen? You do a good job at looking hysterical lurching at the potential of photographers being boogeymen.
travelsonic 3 weeks ago
April 2009
As of February 16, 2009, in Great Britain / UK it became unlawful for a tourist or a photojournalist or a TV video crew to photograph or record a video that includes an image of any law enforcement officer under UK Section 76 Counter-Terrorism Act 2008.
Amazing! Frightening!
I enjoy taking photos and recording video in public spaces all across America. We ought to protect that right here in the USA. Note: I shot this KODAK MOMENT video for PictureAmerica - JOHN LONGENECKER, DGA
PictureAmerica 2 years ago
thats anouther fucking lie it is not illegal to film in public places get ur facts correct
brandonlacavera 2 years ago
No it didn't. There is nothing illegal about filming the police. Please don't spread this nonsense.
PeowPeowPeowLasers 2 years ago 5
Section 76 of the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008 - February 2009 - stop and search powers and limits on photography in public space have extended further. Section 76 permits the arrest of anyone found eliciting, publishing or communicating information relating to members of the armed forces, intelligence services and police officers, which is likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism. Photographing a cop can land you a fine or even a 10-year prison sentence.
PictureAmerica 2 years ago
No it can't. Only photographing any of the above people for the purposes of terrorism can land you such a punishment.
The police must justify the use of these powers. It is not illegal to photograph or film a police officer. Your original claim is bogus.
PeowPeowPeowLasers 2 years ago
@PeowPeowPeowLasers It's no inside the US! It is illegal to do so in the UK, NOT US
jvorus 2 years ago
@PictureAmerica Only if they can prove you intend to use the footage for terrorist reasons and after they have sited that they are stopping you under section 44 of the anti terror laws, they can prove that you got more to worry about than than a fine or even a ten year sentence. If you photograph or film police during their duties in a public space you can not be punished. Police are using the section 44 laws irresponsibly but are under instructions to use it sparingly, even if individuals dont.
krustofskie 1 year ago
@PictureAmerica
An act, statute or code is not law. An act is given a force of law with the consent of the governed (that is you and me). The act you quote may make filming illegal, but not unlawful. There is a great diffrenece between illegal and unlawful - study "FMOTL". As long as you are not breaking the law i.e. committing a crime, you are OK and can sue the fuck out of anyone that restricts your rights. As for what constitutes crime, google what are the elements of a crime.
Macedon51 1 year ago
@PictureAmerica thats the point word (TERRORISM) if they do not suspect you of it they won't search you - if you are going round taking photos of police and security areas or outside sensitive locations expect someone to ask you questions - if you are doing nothing wrong what do you have to worry about.
ococircusboy 1 year ago
@PictureAmerica You can film anything you want in the uk to a certain extent....like everywhere else in the world.
If your in a public place then you can film whomever or whatever you like.
Police may tell you that you cant because of that ACT you just mentioned....but they need REASONABLE grounds to suspect you are planning a terrorist attack or are gaining the information for terrorist purposes.
It not as bad as this guy makes out look at all the 2010 vids of police etc on youtbe. THOUSANDS
lovinit19791 1 year ago
@PictureAmerica That's not correct. It became illegal only if there is suspicion that the footage could be used for terrorist activity.
MegaLotusEater 1 month ago
Oh god what a boring world we live in that we have to adhere to every rule and regulation thrown at us by authorities.
However, get back on a 2-300m lens across the road and get your shot, then u would be on a private highway.
wildenfree 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
tsidow2008 2 years ago
it just says no solicitation or distribution..smacks of paranoia to me. If Joe public took a picture there then she probably wouldn't even notice, but coz the guy probably has a pro camera..OH MY GOD!!!. The tiny sign in the road is a bit pathetic, I mean what is he photographing..If its that sensitive it should be behind a wall..
wildenfree 2 years ago
But if you can see that couch from the street, it's fair game.
RadioReporter01 3 years ago
first of all the security guard is a IDIOT.if it were private property it would have been posted or announced.
2.the paranoia of america is an all time high people using 911 as an excuse for being stupid.
if it were private property why the hell is it in a PUBLIC area. IDIOT.well when they were hiring pigs they sure did hire some one who looked the part didn't they what a boars-head bitch.Keep that film ROLLING!!
sketchmann 3 years ago
It is private property. Thay have that here in NYC too. They have a little marker in the ground you've probably noticed. You have to be on the public sidewalk. They can only ask you to leave
There at 2:43 you see it. But she's wrong about taking anybody's pic. If you go outside the line, you can still film inside the line as long as you can see it from the public sidewalk.
I know, they tried to kick my ass daily for 20 years in NYC for this when I was a crime scene cameraman for the papers
RadioReporter01 3 years ago 3
Security guards are ALL clueless! It's a prerequisite to be clueless, and they test your ability to be clueless before giving you the honors of wearing their plastic badge!
ObamaizGod 3 years ago
funny, when she says; and i quote, "can you not run that film..", sounds to me like a british and not an american!
jamieleedunn12051982 3 years ago
u can film whoever u want whereever u want unless its area 51 lol but its a free country
pk2lum1 3 years ago
When camcorders are outlawed only the security guards will have camcorders.
artsmonterey 3 years ago
Been a fan of super 8 work for a while now. Glad to see you have a channel on youtube.
GOJO2323 3 years ago
wow
jediKnightreviews 3 years ago
As a matter of fact, even if you are on private property, but in a public space, like a street, mall or train station, you are permitted by law to take photos if you do not interfere with certain things, like blocking the way of people. If you bought a ticket to enter that space, they can't accuse you of trespassing, but even if they do accuse, they NEVER have the right to confiscate your equipment or make you delete images.
Best thing to do in these situations - Tell them to call the Police.
ilikeitwhatisit 3 years ago
i would like to comment on what you have said - they never have the right to confiscate your equiptment or make you delete the images - i agree with you, they do not have the right to confiscate your equiptment, but do have the right to ask you to delete the image if they are init or even edit them out of it, as of filming they can ask you to stop filming them.
waterman54 3 years ago
Actually, there is no offense in capturing an image in a public space. Publishing or selling it is another story :)
I like to believe that this is still common sense.
ilikeitwhatisit 3 years ago
"But do have the right to ask you to delete the image if they are init or even edit them out of it"
No they don't.
travelsonic 1 year ago
@travelsonic
I'd very much doubt that you could shove my head up my ass, so stop talking rubbish from behind your keyboard, you stupid gobby yank.
balesy1974 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"'d very much doubt that you could shove my head up my ass, so stop talking rubbish from behind your keyboard"
You stop talking shit, people won't follow up.
Hypocrite.
travelsonic 1 year ago
And don't even think of playing the "your just an internet tough guy" card - it is a crutch that has some merits, but is used to mask one's ignorance about how bad an idea they had in regards to confronting somebody is.
travelsonic 1 year ago
@travelsonic
"And don't even think of playing the "your just an internet tough guy" card"
Or what? What exactly are you going to do about it other than post even more of your worthless and boring drivel?
balesy1974 1 year ago