I am not republican so I do believe in science. If 2000 climate scientists say global warming is happening and man made. That it is very "bad" for all species on earth. But 1-2 wing-nut seudo-scientists say it is cyclic and maybe good. Who are you going to believe? I believe that history will condem the republican party for allowing global-warming to go unchecked.
Disappointing! I was hoping he would talk about the science of global warming.
For those looking for videos were they talk about the science of global warming I recommend "THE GREAT GLOBAL WARMING SWINDLE" usually it will be divided into 8 or more parts & "Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?" 4 parts.
To find them just do a youtube search to find them.
In responce to Merany1 comment, check out "Global Dimming" videos on YouTube or on Nova. That theory was formulated in the 1970s and confirmed in the last couple of years.
This guy was writimg about "Global Cooling" in his first book back in the 1970´s claiming that the evidence was undeniable that we were heading towards a new ice-age.
Here he is saying that he was already holding meetings about Global Warming in 1979 the same decade he was on the ice-age band-wagon.
Not only that but in an interview in 1990 he claimed that he was never in agreement about global cooling but the interviewer opened up his book from the 70´s and shows him what he wrote.
I think you either misundertood what he said before or you're intentionally distorting it, so why don't you post the video - if it exists - so that we can hear what he actually said?
@Merany1 Idiot, there was global cooling due to aerosols. the temperatures dipped from 1940 to 1970 or so.
What Schneider actually did was research. He didn't make any predictions, he simply followed the science. As the science developed, so did his understanding of it. Why do you leave all this out, particularly the part where he said there could be significant cooling *if* pollution increased 400%?
Thank you my husband went to this the other night, i am posting it on myspace where i have 4,050 friends mostly animal rights and environmentalist, i will include your link. Namasté, nan
good video, great and clearly trustworthy scientist
aerobique 1 year ago
global warming is dead.
this is oooooozing with nazi overtones. anyone awake here?
@ 1:49 Heil Hitler (for cryin' out loud) coming right thru his body language even.
romeodigital 2 years ago
I am not republican so I do believe in science. If 2000 climate scientists say global warming is happening and man made. That it is very "bad" for all species on earth. But 1-2 wing-nut seudo-scientists say it is cyclic and maybe good. Who are you going to believe? I believe that history will condem the republican party for allowing global-warming to go unchecked.
TheColelm 2 years ago 6
4 1/2 months with 660 views---i guess people arent paying attention to this nut
acx1n9s 2 years ago
Disappointing! I was hoping he would talk about the science of global warming.
For those looking for videos were they talk about the science of global warming I recommend "THE GREAT GLOBAL WARMING SWINDLE" usually it will be divided into 8 or more parts & "Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause?" 4 parts.
To find them just do a youtube search to find them.
steam0001 2 years ago
@steam0001 yeah, send people to watch one of the best examples of propaganda since Hitler. Great idea.
kkob 1 year ago
In responce to Merany1 comment, check out "Global Dimming" videos on YouTube or on Nova. That theory was formulated in the 1970s and confirmed in the last couple of years.
wolfheinl 3 years ago
This guy was writimg about "Global Cooling" in his first book back in the 1970´s claiming that the evidence was undeniable that we were heading towards a new ice-age.
Here he is saying that he was already holding meetings about Global Warming in 1979 the same decade he was on the ice-age band-wagon.
Not only that but in an interview in 1990 he claimed that he was never in agreement about global cooling but the interviewer opened up his book from the 70´s and shows him what he wrote.
Merany1 3 years ago
I think you either misundertood what he said before or you're intentionally distorting it, so why don't you post the video - if it exists - so that we can hear what he actually said?
cciemail 2 years ago
@Merany1 Idiot, there was global cooling due to aerosols. the temperatures dipped from 1940 to 1970 or so.
What Schneider actually did was research. He didn't make any predictions, he simply followed the science. As the science developed, so did his understanding of it. Why do you leave all this out, particularly the part where he said there could be significant cooling *if* pollution increased 400%?
Lying is bad. Liars suck.
kkob 1 year ago
Thank you my husband went to this the other night, i am posting it on myspace where i have 4,050 friends mostly animal rights and environmentalist, i will include your link. Namasté, nan
SEElovEverywhere 4 years ago