Don't worry, he says he wants at least to play Wimbledon in 3 years, but it wouldn't be impossible for him to play for one or two more years after that.
People goes like he won't win an other GS since he lost Wimbledon last year. He won 3 more and attended lost the other in final... If this doesn't mean he can win MORE titles, what does it mean?
Now that hes won in Paris, I think it just more solidifies his place in history as the greatest player that played the game, in my opinion, Sampras said. Im a huge Laver fan, and he had a few years in there where he didnt have an opportunity to win majors. But you cant compare the eras. And in this era, the competition is much more fierce than Rods.
its an advertising... JERK!!! its has no mathematical sense, its only have a conceptual sense, none equation results in pete sampras, its not a number!!! i think you must be a part of the big bang tehory staff!!!
Let it go how can someone like that understand its easy .You dont even need a calculator to answer this equation .If you've seen what Fed has one you'll get it so dont bother with this .=)
they divided by 6 before adding the 1 just to emphasize his latest title. otherwise yes it would have been logical to divide by 6 after. otherwise, this equation is really witty I think.
Very funny!!!Nice video...
ioakeim98 4 months ago
lol
Zpeed08 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There's your equation:
Swiss Cheese < Spanish Bull
jasongsux 1 year ago
RF followed PS's playing style
centosan1 1 year ago
it should be 16 majors not 13 ;)
qwertyriffic 1 year ago
Funny
xRIC4RDOxSTAx 1 year ago
I don't think Sampras appreciated this commercial at all. Not one little bit.
manco82 2 years ago 13
Roger Federer ist der beste überhaupt.
StefanR10 2 years ago
Haha, nice Sampras illustration xD
FEDERER, THE GREATEST OF ALL-TIME!
Vinivinilombardi 2 years ago
Nice and halarious Nike advertisement,
MegaTennismaster
MegaTennismaster 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
nadal < federer < del potro
GaddingImp 2 years ago
federe is best of del potro
vinirabechi 2 years ago
how about roger > everybody else? i think that pretty much sums up everything.
dontreallycare3 2 years ago 33
rog will win wimbledon!
he wants to win that before he'll leave us...
COME ON ROGER!
DenDenKing 2 years ago
Don't worry, he says he wants at least to play Wimbledon in 3 years, but it wouldn't be impossible for him to play for one or two more years after that.
People goes like he won't win an other GS since he lost Wimbledon last year. He won 3 more and attended lost the other in final... If this doesn't mean he can win MORE titles, what does it mean?
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
Now that hes won in Paris, I think it just more solidifies his place in history as the greatest player that played the game, in my opinion, Sampras said. Im a huge Laver fan, and he had a few years in there where he didnt have an opportunity to win majors. But you cant compare the eras. And in this era, the competition is much more fierce than Rods.
subu36rz 2 years ago
this makes no sense ((1 x 13)/6 +(1) ) = 3.16667 not 14...
why did they divide by 6 before adding the 1???
evil221884 2 years ago
only a jerk can make a comment like that!!! you are so DUMB!!!
dnoriega81 2 years ago 3
i'm stupid?? , explain it then....
evil221884 2 years ago
its an advertising... JERK!!! its has no mathematical sense, its only have a conceptual sense, none equation results in pete sampras, its not a number!!! i think you must be a part of the big bang tehory staff!!!
dnoriega81 2 years ago
Hey! there's an expression saying it's better to end with a Bang, they were only paid millions to flip it over. LOL
GueorguiJoukov 2 years ago
Let it go how can someone like that understand its easy .You dont even need a calculator to answer this equation .If you've seen what Fed has one you'll get it so dont bother with this .=)
JinchuurichiRasmijn 2 years ago
some one took this literally
you crazy
mjeffo22 2 years ago
TROLL'D
spiff524 2 years ago
OMG ur so stupid..
sexyadriana 2 years ago
its just a commercial
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
they divided by 6 before adding the 1 just to emphasize his latest title. otherwise yes it would have been logical to divide by 6 after. otherwise, this equation is really witty I think.
16pupuce 2 years ago 3
T-T you cant do that equation T.T you cant add 15 gs and 1 swiss man, is lke if you could do 15g + 1s
DarkYepes 2 years ago
hahaha very funny commercial... love it...
kanzaki88 2 years ago
roflmao!
nonsped 2 years ago
ha lol
liampimp12341234 2 years ago
lol
wtfidcgl 2 years ago
very cute
julieangel09 2 years ago
...i'm confused...it doesn't make any sense xD
florome 2 years ago
lol
OBeymydreamz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SUX
SharkyssMachine 2 years ago