The part are being propelled upwards, because as the top slowly starts moving downwards, the metal fasade breaks apart like a sphagetti you take and break in the middle... jesus
Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) orchestrated a carefully planned progressive collapse that first stripped the floors off of the central core and then felled the rigid central core into an open area to the rear of the site.
I must say, I've never heard of metal breaking under stress. Then again I could be wrong. Dosen't it normally bend? I mean were not talking about wood here.
I'm to sure about that, breaking joints. I mean, take an empty milk or orange juice container, close it at the top and smash down on it hard from the top; it will stop at some point before reaching the bottom, unless the external force is extremely powerful to keep proceeding to the bottom. What external forces were acting on the WTC to push it all down through tons of tons of mass, steel and concrete imbedded 70ft into the earth?
Once the debris started piling up from ther top parts of the towers, it smashed down floors and pried outward on the perimeter columns, further weakening the floor connections, maybe breaking them loose ahead of the falling debris. The core columns, initially, only failed at the damaged floors. That was due to impact damage and heat weakening of the steel. Without the full coating of insulation, the steel was good for far less than its UL rating. Mechanical resonnance took out the cores.
"maybe breaking them loose" Jan 1971, a 16-story condo in Mass collapsed. High winds had blown over space heaters on the top floor, causing a fire. The shoring under the roof slab failed. Workers entered the bldg the next morning to assess the damage. Without warning, a proges collapse began & stripped out half of the structural slabs. Hunds of tons of debris was left hanging from reinforcing elements on the south side of the central elevator & stair well core, taking the lives of 4 workers.
This building did not fully collaspes, like the towers, the fires were near the roof.
Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) was called to the site by SAS Demolition after removal of debris from the initial collapse and recovery of the bodies of workmen had been completed.
Controlled Demolition Incorporated worked for three days to prepare the structure for implosion. Site constraints on three sides of the structure meant that the rigid elevator core had to be dealt with.
The mass ejecta\ed away from the building was most powdered wall board (not concrete.) The aluminum cladding mostly broke loose from the steel and fell most eraticly. Large sections of perimeter columns fell away as debris piled up on the floors, creating an over-pressurization wehich helped push the perimeter columns outward, thus further weakening floor connections, thus reducing resistance to the collapse.
When metal breaks under stress, there is no telling where some of the pieces will wind up. Those metal elements seen above the dust were probably broken off from the top section, almost as though spring-loaded. They appear to be aluminum cladding. Air rersistance would slow that down as it falls.
There is no way the top could hold together, being subjected to gravity on one end and crumpling against the lower floors at the other. In this alone, it resembles CD.
You can see the top section come through the dust cloud, blown to pieces....it was complete one second...disappeared into the dust then reappears at bottom of screen blowing through the dust cloud in chunks...why did it not just continue to crash to the floor intact....
Dust has mass. Broken concrete has mass. Desks, chairs, bodies have mass. Mass, set in motion, has kinetic energy. Kinetic energy striking a floor and delivering more foot-pounds of pressure than the floor is designed to support break that floor loose. Which adds more mas in motion. Repeat sequence.
You people who think this was all a scam, that these buildings were brought down by explosives and things are amazing. I was there, i saw the two planes hit, and i was one of those panicked on the streets running from the cloud. I can tell you this was very much real.
You deny something that is not being suggested, there is no arguement that nothing hit the towers, we do not think that the planes never happened, do your research and then come back.
nobody's saying it's not real, they're just demonstrating that it may not have been caused by the people we're supposed to believe did it. Of *course* it was real, of *course* it happened. The only 'scam' is one that the government is trying to pull by blaming 19 middle eastern 20-somethings for the death of 3000 people. Occam's razor, much?
what makes me believe (in this video) that explosions may have been in the buildings, is the part when the part of the building falls, and then it explodes.
it's not "exploding". buildings aren't designed to move or tilt sideways...that's engineering 101. that top section weighed about 200,000,000 lbs so whether it's intact or falling apart, it's still moving downwards...it crushed the rest of the building.
People who believe all that conspiracy stuff are so gullible. The building simply gave way under the strain of the top floors and upon collapsing and grating together it creates silica dust which is part of the dust you see near the bottom of the screen. Take more physics classes and fewer socialism classes.
Related to these flashes, what is really interesting is that they follow the same pattern of the flashes that could be seen in the North Tower when the first plane had just hit the building. Watch this video: www dot youtube dot com/watch?v=f7BGm9MKv4U
It´s true. There are multiple flashes in the third floor below the lower floor with that black smoke coming out through the narrow windows when the tower starts to collapse. You can see it at 00:11, just before the camera zooms out. It´s quite bizarre. Is there any suggestion to explain this fact?
YEP! this video is the best video to show that THE CONSRICY IS FALSE! look at the metal, it falds backward when falling, does not explode, meaning it was a natural collaps
The consricy is clearly falsified by this leak---Impossible for the building's mass, with it's inertia horizontally jutting-- to have either caused a pancack llapse or transfer enough energy to create an implosion resulting in 99% pulverized concrete---It simply disintegrates like a sand castle
This has been flagged as spam show
'Tuesday Morning in September'. Available on DVD. Runtime 130 minutes.
Pure, unfiltered, authentic, and being released in such a way to keep its integrity.
Project is not affiliated and or connected to, working for any organization,
putting forth propaganda and or slant perspectives of the events on 9/11.
It is the most complete chronicle in real time of the wtc attacks.
tusmorninginsept 3 months ago
TOWER 7 ..... say no more :)
apoplexy1974 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
False flag operation.
73849309378 1 year ago
Them flashes are from the videotape. The flashes dont come from the towers its from the crappy videotape
The1979Warriors 1 year ago
watch zeitgeist
Bizmak1 2 years ago
The part are being propelled upwards, because as the top slowly starts moving downwards, the metal fasade breaks apart like a sphagetti you take and break in the middle... jesus
hellnawnaw 3 years ago
"like a sphagetti you take and break in the middle"
I tell you what, why don't you try to bend you're fork or your chicken knife and see if it will break or snap like a "sphagetti"
Oh and check this out, while your at, put it under over your stove flame and wait until it gets red hot, then try to bend it, see what happens.
And if you don't mind, can you post you're findings?
Galanttttt 3 years ago
Galanttttt: Why don't you jam a fork in your eyeball, film it and post the results :-)
Smacked980 3 years ago
LOL, that is funny Smacked980.
Galanttttt 3 years ago
Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) orchestrated a carefully planned progressive collapse that first stripped the floors off of the central core and then felled the rigid central core into an open area to the rear of the site.
Galanttttt 3 years ago
I must say, I've never heard of metal breaking under stress. Then again I could be wrong. Dosen't it normally bend? I mean were not talking about wood here.
Galanttttt 3 years ago
Mostly, it breaks at joints.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
I'm to sure about that, breaking joints. I mean, take an empty milk or orange juice container, close it at the top and smash down on it hard from the top; it will stop at some point before reaching the bottom, unless the external force is extremely powerful to keep proceeding to the bottom. What external forces were acting on the WTC to push it all down through tons of tons of mass, steel and concrete imbedded 70ft into the earth?
Galanttttt 3 years ago 5
Once the debris started piling up from ther top parts of the towers, it smashed down floors and pried outward on the perimeter columns, further weakening the floor connections, maybe breaking them loose ahead of the falling debris. The core columns, initially, only failed at the damaged floors. That was due to impact damage and heat weakening of the steel. Without the full coating of insulation, the steel was good for far less than its UL rating. Mechanical resonnance took out the cores.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
"maybe breaking them loose" Jan 1971, a 16-story condo in Mass collapsed. High winds had blown over space heaters on the top floor, causing a fire. The shoring under the roof slab failed. Workers entered the bldg the next morning to assess the damage. Without warning, a proges collapse began & stripped out half of the structural slabs. Hunds of tons of debris was left hanging from reinforcing elements on the south side of the central elevator & stair well core, taking the lives of 4 workers.
Galanttttt 3 years ago
This building did not fully collaspes, like the towers, the fires were near the roof.
Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) was called to the site by SAS Demolition after removal of debris from the initial collapse and recovery of the bodies of workmen had been completed.
Controlled Demolition Incorporated worked for three days to prepare the structure for implosion. Site constraints on three sides of the structure meant that the rigid elevator core had to be dealt with.
Galanttttt 3 years ago
The mass ejecta\ed away from the building was most powdered wall board (not concrete.) The aluminum cladding mostly broke loose from the steel and fell most eraticly. Large sections of perimeter columns fell away as debris piled up on the floors, creating an over-pressurization wehich helped push the perimeter columns outward, thus further weakening floor connections, thus reducing resistance to the collapse.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
When metal breaks under stress, there is no telling where some of the pieces will wind up. Those metal elements seen above the dust were probably broken off from the top section, almost as though spring-loaded. They appear to be aluminum cladding. Air rersistance would slow that down as it falls.
There is no way the top could hold together, being subjected to gravity on one end and crumpling against the lower floors at the other. In this alone, it resembles CD.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
You can see the top section come through the dust cloud, blown to pieces....it was complete one second...disappeared into the dust then reappears at bottom of screen blowing through the dust cloud in chunks...why did it not just continue to crash to the floor intact....
Wyndup 4 years ago 11
@Wyndup because it got pulverized on impact.
ptscao 10 months ago
@Wyndup you know why buddy..EXPLOSIVES!!!!!!!!1
alecboi84 7 months ago
@Wyndup geez
PhotoShopChannel 7 months ago
the ´pancake-theory´ is bullshit. its physically wrong.
its controlled demolition.
i couldnt believe, but its clear now.
antissimo 4 years ago
i guess you didn't see the columns break, did you?
rjs87 4 years ago
yea really how can dust pancake any ways
occision 4 years ago
Dust has mass. Broken concrete has mass. Desks, chairs, bodies have mass. Mass, set in motion, has kinetic energy. Kinetic energy striking a floor and delivering more foot-pounds of pressure than the floor is designed to support break that floor loose. Which adds more mas in motion. Repeat sequence.
Down comes the building.
leftysergeant 4 years ago
so everything just turned to dust...ok..
there was no collapse..as far as floors hitting each other.
the mass was being ejected away from the building.
occision 3 years ago
You can see flashes and upward projectiles there can you?
TroyaE117 4 years ago
You all have extremely,intelligent and interesting arguments.
I am saddened that we,or,YouTube friends(all of us), must still listen,well debate this horrible day...Best to all, as I know/feel you all mean well.
repelghosts 4 years ago
You people who think this was all a scam, that these buildings were brought down by explosives and things are amazing. I was there, i saw the two planes hit, and i was one of those panicked on the streets running from the cloud. I can tell you this was very much real.
ChicoSk8er1984 4 years ago
thats the point, it got you scared as fuck didn't it? Hello martial law.
mattpotvin 4 years ago
You deny something that is not being suggested, there is no arguement that nothing hit the towers, we do not think that the planes never happened, do your research and then come back.
dudepal187 4 years ago
nobody's saying it's not real, they're just demonstrating that it may not have been caused by the people we're supposed to believe did it. Of *course* it was real, of *course* it happened. The only 'scam' is one that the government is trying to pull by blaming 19 middle eastern 20-somethings for the death of 3000 people. Occam's razor, much?
brienne1979 4 years ago
what makes me believe (in this video) that explosions may have been in the buildings, is the part when the part of the building falls, and then it explodes.
XMen3Rocks 4 years ago
Watch the top of the building, at the end its falling away and its also exploding, so it couldnt crush the rest of the buliding
bejbous 4 years ago
it's not "exploding". buildings aren't designed to move or tilt sideways...that's engineering 101. that top section weighed about 200,000,000 lbs so whether it's intact or falling apart, it's still moving downwards...it crushed the rest of the building.
NOsaints06 4 years ago
The only flashes I saw was a bunch of tracking on the tape....
Eyrothath 5 years ago
People who believe all that conspiracy stuff are so gullible. The building simply gave way under the strain of the top floors and upon collapsing and grating together it creates silica dust which is part of the dust you see near the bottom of the screen. Take more physics classes and fewer socialism classes.
rackers32 5 years ago
MARTIANS DID IT.. its clear... they want us to kill each other so when they invade there will be less of us to kill...
XEHOD 5 years ago
Watch also the first three seconds of this video: www dot video dot google dot es/videoplay?docid=653266204351004745&q=wtc
raulfdhs 5 years ago
Related to these flashes, what is really interesting is that they follow the same pattern of the flashes that could be seen in the North Tower when the first plane had just hit the building. Watch this video: www dot youtube dot com/watch?v=f7BGm9MKv4U
raulfdhs 5 years ago
I see.
raulfdhs 5 years ago
It´s true. There are multiple flashes in the third floor below the lower floor with that black smoke coming out through the narrow windows when the tower starts to collapse. You can see it at 00:11, just before the camera zooms out. It´s quite bizarre. Is there any suggestion to explain this fact?
raulfdhs 5 years ago
YEP! this video is the best video to show that THE CONSRICY IS FALSE! look at the metal, it falds backward when falling, does not explode, meaning it was a natural collaps
jc84144 5 years ago 2
The consricy is clearly falsified by this leak---Impossible for the building's mass, with it's inertia horizontally jutting-- to have either caused a pancack llapse or transfer enough energy to create an implosion resulting in 99% pulverized concrete---It simply disintegrates like a sand castle
rurureturns 5 years ago