Added: 5 years ago
From: lynxland
Views: 21,018
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • TOWER 7 ..... say no more :)

  • Them flashes are from the videotape. The flashes dont come from the towers its from the crappy videotape

  • watch zeitgeist

  • The part are being propelled upwards, because as the top slowly starts moving downwards, the metal fasade breaks apart like a sphagetti you take and break in the middle... jesus

  • "like a sphagetti you take and break in the middle"

    I tell you what, why don't you try to bend you're fork or your chicken knife and see if it will break or snap like a "sphagetti"

    Oh and check this out, while your at, put it under over your stove flame and wait until it gets red hot, then try to bend it, see what happens.

    And if you don't mind, can you post you're findings?

  • Galanttttt: Why don't you jam a fork in your eyeball, film it and post the results :-)

  • LOL, that is funny Smacked980.

  • Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) orchestrated a carefully planned progressive collapse that first stripped the floors off of the central core and then felled the rigid central core into an open area to the rear of the site.

  • I must say, I've never heard of metal breaking under stress. Then again I could be wrong. Dosen't it normally bend? I mean were not talking about wood here.

  • Mostly, it breaks at joints.

  • I'm to sure about that, breaking joints. I mean, take an empty milk or orange juice container, close it at the top and smash down on it hard from the top; it will stop at some point before reaching the bottom, unless the external force is extremely powerful to keep proceeding to the bottom. What external forces were acting on the WTC to push it all down through tons of tons of mass, steel and concrete imbedded 70ft into the earth?

  • Once the debris started piling up from ther top parts of the towers, it smashed down floors and pried outward on the perimeter columns, further weakening the floor connections, maybe breaking them loose ahead of the falling debris. The core columns, initially, only failed at the damaged floors. That was due to impact damage and heat weakening of the steel. Without the full coating of insulation, the steel was good for far less than its UL rating. Mechanical resonnance took out the cores.

  • "maybe breaking them loose" Jan 1971, a 16-story condo in Mass collapsed. High winds had blown over space heaters on the top floor, causing a fire. The shoring under the roof slab failed. Workers entered the bldg the next morning to assess the damage. Without warning, a proges collapse began & stripped out half of the structural slabs. Hunds of tons of debris was left hanging from reinforcing elements on the south side of the central elevator & stair well core, taking the lives of 4 workers.

  • This building did not fully collaspes, like the towers, the fires were near the roof.

    Controlled Demolition Incorporated (CDI) was called to the site by SAS Demolition after removal of debris from the initial collapse and recovery of the bodies of workmen had been completed. 

    Controlled Demolition Incorporated worked for three days to prepare the structure for implosion. Site constraints on three sides of the structure meant that the rigid elevator core had to be dealt with.

  • The mass ejecta\ed away from the building was most powdered wall board (not concrete.) The aluminum cladding mostly broke loose from the steel and fell most eraticly. Large sections of perimeter columns fell away as debris piled up on the floors, creating an over-pressurization wehich helped push the perimeter columns outward, thus further weakening floor connections, thus reducing resistance to the collapse.

  • When metal breaks under stress, there is no telling where some of the pieces will wind up. Those metal elements seen above the dust were probably broken off from the top section, almost as though spring-loaded. They appear to be aluminum cladding. Air rersistance would slow that down as it falls.

    There is no way the top could hold together, being subjected to gravity on one end and crumpling against the lower floors at the other. In this alone, it resembles CD.

  • You can see the top section come through the dust cloud, blown to pieces....it was complete one second...disappeared into the dust then reappears at bottom of screen blowing through the dust cloud in chunks...why did it not just continue to crash to the floor intact....

  • @Wyndup because it got pulverized on impact.

  • @Wyndup you know why buddy..EXPLOSIVES!!!!!!!!1

  • @Wyndup geez

  • the ´pancake-theory´ is bullshit. its physically wrong.

    its controlled demolition.

    i couldnt believe, but its clear now.

  • i guess you didn't see the columns break, did you?

  • yea really how can dust pancake any ways

  • Dust has mass. Broken concrete has mass. Desks, chairs, bodies have mass. Mass, set in motion, has kinetic energy. Kinetic energy striking a floor and delivering more foot-pounds of pressure than the floor is designed to support break that floor loose. Which adds more mas in motion. Repeat sequence.

    Down comes the building.

  • so everything just turned to dust...ok..

    there was no collapse..as far as floors hitting each other.

    the mass was being ejected away from the building.

  • You can see flashes and upward projectiles there can you?

  • You all have extremely,intelligent and interesting arguments.

    I am saddened that we,or,YouTube friends(all of us), must still listen,well debate this horrible day...Best to all, as I know/feel you all mean well.

  • You people who think this was all a scam, that these buildings were brought down by explosives and things are amazing. I was there, i saw the two planes hit, and i was one of those panicked on the streets running from the cloud. I can tell you this was very much real.

  • thats the point, it got you scared as fuck didn't it? Hello martial law.

  • You deny something that is not being suggested, there is no arguement that nothing hit the towers, we do not think that the planes never happened, do your research and then come back.

  • nobody's saying it's not real, they're just demonstrating that it may not have been caused by the people we're supposed to believe did it. Of *course* it was real, of *course* it happened. The only 'scam' is one that the government is trying to pull by blaming 19 middle eastern 20-somethings for the death of 3000 people. Occam's razor, much?

  • what makes me believe (in this video) that explosions may have been in the buildings, is the part when the part of the building falls, and then it explodes.

  • Watch the top of the building, at the end its falling away and its also exploding, so it couldnt crush the rest of the buliding

  • it's not "exploding". buildings aren't designed to move or tilt sideways...that's engineering 101. that top section weighed about 200,000,000 lbs so whether it's intact or falling apart, it's still moving downwards...it crushed the rest of the building.

  • The only flashes I saw was a bunch of tracking on the tape....

  • People who believe all that conspiracy stuff are so gullible. The building simply gave way under the strain of the top floors and upon collapsing and grating together it creates silica dust which is part of the dust you see near the bottom of the screen. Take more physics classes and fewer socialism classes.

  • MARTIANS DID IT.. its clear... they want us to kill each other so when they invade there will be less of us to kill...

  • Watch also the first three seconds of this video: www dot video dot google dot es/videoplay?docid=65326620435­1004745&q=wtc

  • Related to these flashes, what is really interesting is that they follow the same pattern of the flashes that could be seen in the North Tower when the first plane had just hit the building. Watch this video: www dot youtube dot com/watch?v=f7BGm9MKv4U

  • I see.

  • It´s true. There are multiple flashes in the third floor below the lower floor with that black smoke coming out through the narrow windows when the tower starts to collapse. You can see it at 00:11, just before the camera zooms out. It´s quite bizarre. Is there any suggestion to explain this fact?

  • YEP! this video is the best video to show that THE CONSRICY IS FALSE! look at the metal, it falds backward when falling, does not explode, meaning it was a natural collaps

  • The consricy is clearly falsified by this leak---Impossible for the building's mass, with it's inertia horizontally jutting-- to have either caused a pancack llapse or transfer enough energy to create an implosion resulting in 99% pulverized concrete---It simply disintegrates like a sand castle

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more