Added: 4 years ago
From: Homoclassicus
Views: 15,328
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • People need to lighten up on the person who called Sutherland's timbre as "acute". In Italian, "acuto" can mean "high-pitched". That would certainly describe Joan Sutherland's voice.

  • I'd give the performance an A-minus. Tecnically off a bit wih a few missed breathing cues, slightly off tone at places, chasing the high notes, etc.

    The recording gets a D. It sounds like it was recorded on a Panasonic cassette recorder by someone sitting in the balcony. Echoes and audience coughs and rustelling don't do it for me.

  • wonderful music, weird ass libretto

  • You are correct, because the fiorture in this is a mess! This is awful! Fleming should be ashamed.

  • Only time lucky enough to hear Ms. Horne was in the early 90's in The Ghosts of Versailles. She was in such magnificient voice--the sound came at you from very direction. Stentorian in volume. And what magnificient comic timing! Fleming was wonderful too, back then. Thank you so much for posting this.

  • Thank you so much for posting this!

    I attended several of Ms Horne's last classical recitals in the late 1990s-2000 and they were by far the most amazing artistic experiences of my life. She is the only singer I have experienced who makes me feel as if she is singing directly to me.

    Brava General Horne!

  • Ahhhh, a Fleming recording which doesn't make me cringe! Where did her wonderful voice go? Horne is a true grand master of opera. bravo "Mr" Horne :)

  • Fleming was in a much worse voice than the one she had in the same duet in 1990! Listen to that clip (in Youtube as well),her coloratura was much better, the run was clearer. Here, she started to develop into her bad bad habits...the jazzy thing in her operatic voice which is aweful. Where has her voice in the old days gone?! With Horne, her voice was even worse under such a comparison.

  • I hate that jazzy thing too.. Where in the hell did she get the impression that this was correct for this style of music? If she wants to sing jazzy, then sing JAZZ

  • Marylin Horne is so amazing. I think her Arsace has been unrivaled for nearly 40 years. She's sang the role with all of the great divas: Sutherland, Caballe, Anderson, Fleming. It would be interesting to know which soprano she enjoyed singing with the most and who she thinks was the best Semiramide.

  • I guess she enjoyed singing this most with Sutherland, for obvious reasons: she was a long-time friend of hers, she had a partnership of more than 20 years with her and, quite frankly, Sutherland was the best of them all in this role. ;-)

    However I must add Fleming never sang Semiramide, what is a pity IMO. Her Armida leads me to believe she could've been a great Semiramide.

  • @Homoclassicus I don't think I can agree - her Semiramide with Caballe was absolute magic - they complimented each other perfectly.

  • the blend of tone is great, they both have a very commanding dramatic power that complement eachother very well. However, that being said, the technique does sound a bit sloppy, a lot of the little notes get lost. unfortunately im afraid it may be renne's fault here, horne was a rossini mezzo role specialist for most of her career.

  • I completely agree. She was good in some respect, but highly manufactured. I strongly believe that diction is part of the belcanto technique and that aiming just for a beautiful sound betrays the drama.

  • A surprising recording in many respects. Fleming's agility of the voice has dissapeared, and

    many ornamented notes are regrettably not clear, though

    she sang Rossini's Armida some ten years ago, which

    impressed me with her technique she possesed at that

    time. As for Horne, it is quite miraculous that she should

    be able to sing this role, with some defects, considering

    her age. Since Horne, I've never met another Arsace

    overshadowing her.

  • Indeed, Horne and Sutherland do the trick. This is, don't know just not the same at all

  • Sutherland's timbre acute and light, you mean it? I'm sorry, but this is a totally wrong comment, because if there is a characteristic Sutherland never had in her voice was the lightness of a leggero soprano. It was a dense, large, rounded, darker tone. And she did pronounce, people overestimate her diction problem. I myself can understand most of what she sings, and in the 70's her diction got very acceptable. The whole world wouldn't acclaim her for nothing.

  • @Holderlin You need to clearly state your meaning! Sutherland's voice was NEVER light. Vocal timbre cannot be described meaningfully as "acute". Her diction was much easier to understand "live" -- I don't know what happened with records; they misrepresent her in other ways as well...

  • A fine piece of Rossini singing.

    The best Fleming did (i.m.o.) was her Armida. I love this duet Sutherland and horne were magical in it. So were Anderson and Horne but one of my favourite versions has to be Devia and Podles.

  • Yes, we have grown accustomed to her scooping and shoving of air for "expression." Fine. IMO Fleming's deviations from the score distort the overall shape of the music.

  • This video leaves a bitter aftertaste: It's like this music can't be sung by no one else but Horne and Sutherland.

  • Sutherland and Horne sang this is such harmony with each other. Fleming is just all over the place, altering the music, and making this sound really sloppy in certain places, especially toward the end.

  • @nilsuthor

    Please listen to Devia/Podles.

  • Horne was in amazing voice here, but much as I love Fleming, why does she always alter the line of the music in such a silly and show off way. The music is perfect the way it was written. Horne voice belended so wonderfully with Sutherland in this music it is hard hearing anyone else sing it.

  • la fleming non potrai mai neanche avvicinarsi a quello che è stata la STUPENDA

  • Didn't know Fleming could do that with her voice. I love her more and more each day.

  • Marilyn Horne, at 65, can still deliver her fabulous singing.

    Renée Fleming is the new "Stupenda" !!!

    I wish she can perform the complete opera one this days...

  • I am told she will be doing it at the Met in the next couple of years. a revival of the production they have.

  • Comment removed

  • Fleming is not the new stupenda. Her voice is not anywhere NEAR the size of Sutherland, for one thing, so the fact that she can sing the fioritura is not all that surprising. She also sounded a LOT better in 99 than she does now. She's supposed to be tackling Norma too. Singing one scene or aria out of context and singing the entire role are entirely different. She'd better watch it or she'll ruin herself worse than she already has.

  • Actually I think Fleming's vocal shape is amazing for her age. No sign of decline at all can be heard in her most recent interpretations, apart from a slightly drier lower middle register. Of course she's not the new La Stupenda in exact terms, I'm quite sure fernandobicudo didn't mean it.

    But we should praise her performance more than create polemics with comparisons with Sutherland, who obviously can't be substituted by anyone. ;-)

  • Right, but my point is that maybe she's taking things on that are...beyond her, a la Netrebko. Semiramide and Norma are not for the fainthearted. Norma in particular needs a voice with more than substantial size to be effective, which is why singers like Callas and Sutherland did it so well. BOTH roles could easily ruin a voice built like anything less than a tank.

  • A few months ago Fleming realized that she can't sing Norma. I just found out recently (I'm a little behind). I was kind of disappointed because I wanted to hear her take on the role, for better or for worse.

  • She's wise not to take on Norma. She is just not suitable for the role even with her good voice in the old days. With her current voice, she could not sing such a demanding role.

  • Well, I've heard her Casta Diva, but that's it. Anyway, she's not going to do it so she probably agrees with you.

  • Horne, however, is AMAZING. I saw her in concert around this time, and she was amazing. She still had technique to BURN, and the voice was DAMN BIG, which made it all the more amazing that she could do what she did. What a GODDESS.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more