Ok so the ocean temp data at 50m correlate well with our solar activity but how about ground surface temps and satelite temps? Do they correlate well for the last 26 to 46 years?
Credible and fascinating science rejected because it is "not interesting"? Pull the other one. The phoney and silly excuses for rejection were simply because those corrupt AGW nutters were blocking papers that challenged their dogmas, just as the climategate files reveal. How low can a scientist go? Very low, it seems.
Wait if our solar system is moving around the Milky Way opposite to the stars then wouldn't the constellations change over 250 million years?Then how could past astrologers have known the star positions within the constellations? The theory needs another explanation especially if the temperature variations were done on 10 year intervals. What our solar system travels between galactic arms every 11 years or so? Sounds like it matches sunspot data more than galactic positioning, 5-10° difference?
It also has to do with the suns magnetic field being week or strong and therefore letting in more or less cosmic rays. Those are the small changes we see on a decade basis.
The constellations do change... isnt it called the procession of the equinox or something? Past astrologers were aware of it and it was always factored into their observations.
Sunspots would affect the magnetic radiation that inhibits the cosmic rays, that explains the variations every 11 years. That doesnt discount the effect of the position of the solar system i wouldnt think. Maybe it adds or subtracts to the effect?
@peteyOZ yea we're in the age of pices now right? used to be the ram, soon will be aquarian age. think they say about 2,200 years or so... it's wherever constellation that the north pole is pointing at during the vernal equinox.
Ok so the ocean temp data at 50m correlate well with our solar activity but how about ground surface temps and satelite temps? Do they correlate well for the last 26 to 46 years?
testingsthlm 9 months ago
that one piano sample they borrowed from american beauty is getting really old by now.
itsgarrison 2 years ago
Credible and fascinating science rejected because it is "not interesting"? Pull the other one. The phoney and silly excuses for rejection were simply because those corrupt AGW nutters were blocking papers that challenged their dogmas, just as the climategate files reveal. How low can a scientist go? Very low, it seems.
73elephants 2 years ago 19
A scientist? they are all doing it brother. they've killed science in favor of their ideology.
easymoney4ever 2 years ago
Looks quite valid to me.
Rockyspoon09 2 years ago 3
Svensmarks ideas would stop the massive tax funded CO2 research funding...that is why he cannot get it published.
People talk about Big oil corrupting science...how about Big government doing the same.
Science with a bias is not science.
AGW theory is about funding for jobs programs...just like most nonsense in government...create a crisis and the funding goes up...
it works with war as well as climate.
Best way to get rich is to create a crisis and get gov to sanction your monopoly product...
seaplaneguy1 2 years ago 21
"Have to see how other scientist will receive the work and data. "
Then no one will publish...
The truth is not what they tell you....its what they will not publish.
thanks for this video.
junglelord 2 years ago 6
Wait if our solar system is moving around the Milky Way opposite to the stars then wouldn't the constellations change over 250 million years?Then how could past astrologers have known the star positions within the constellations? The theory needs another explanation especially if the temperature variations were done on 10 year intervals. What our solar system travels between galactic arms every 11 years or so? Sounds like it matches sunspot data more than galactic positioning, 5-10° difference?
BigNewGames 2 years ago
Of course, they would change beyond recognition in a few ten thousand years.
That is a long time, before the starmaps you have now
Kenzofeis 2 years ago 2
It also has to do with the suns magnetic field being week or strong and therefore letting in more or less cosmic rays. Those are the small changes we see on a decade basis.
cwventer1 2 years ago
The constellations do change... isnt it called the procession of the equinox or something? Past astrologers were aware of it and it was always factored into their observations.
Sunspots would affect the magnetic radiation that inhibits the cosmic rays, that explains the variations every 11 years. That doesnt discount the effect of the position of the solar system i wouldnt think. Maybe it adds or subtracts to the effect?
peteyOZ 2 years ago
@peteyOZ yea we're in the age of pices now right? used to be the ram, soon will be aquarian age. think they say about 2,200 years or so... it's wherever constellation that the north pole is pointing at during the vernal equinox.
thats my guess on that
ParapaDrifter 1 year ago
Find a way to stop the global alarmist, they want to reduce the earths population.
marcusborg83 2 years ago 6