Jehmu should be called shamoo and all she and all her liberal pieces of shit want to do is control any and everything... All you libs around the world do everyone around the world a favor and step out in-front of a bus already...
I'm pro-choice, in that I don't believe a fetus is a being until there is a heartbeat. Unless it is completely necessary, you shouldn't abort after this point. But pro-lifers need to be free to speak as well.
for once o'reilly is actually right. there's nothing wrong with the ad and it isn't controversial at all. but he's still an a-hole, of course. never seen someone who couldn't keep his mouth closed for less time.
I'm Pro-Choice but the the Pro-Life people have just as much right to speak their piece as any other leftist group. We are all humans and we all deserve respect. Some of these comments are so ignorant that they make me ashamed to call myself human.
Jehmu Greene you are a classy woman. Racists and idiots will be racists and idiots. But I still disagree with you, I dislike Focus on the Family, but the commercial wasn't offensive. It was a good commercial and I agree with what it was saying. I don't think that women get abortions unless medically necessary.
@Disregarded388 YOUR FACE IS GROSS. ALMOST AS GROSS AS THIS GORILLA WITH A HUGE OPEN NOSE (GORILLA NOSE) AND HUGE LIPS (GORILLA LIPS) AND PUBICHAIR ON HEAD
LIKE A TYPICAL MONKEY, I CAN'T HELP BUT TO STARE AT HER HUGE OPEN NOSE WITH A SOUR, DISGUSTED, AND SICKENING EXPRESSION TRUE STORY
SEE, WITH NIGGERS, THEY'VE LITERALLY HAD HUMANS BEND OVER BACKWARDS FOR THEM THE MOMENT THEY CAME OUT OF THEIR GORILLA MOMMY VAGINAS SO IF YOU LISTEN TO THEM THEY'RE ALWAYS SAYING "THERE'S STILL INEQUALITY IN THIS COUNTRY!" (IMPLYING: 'WHITE PPL, YOU OWE US MORE SHIT!') OR "THEY (RICH) NEED TO 'SHARE' MORE!' IT'S SO INTERWOVEN IN THE FABRIC OF NIGGERS TRUE STORY
@Eleetnessful There are some racism arguments that are ridiculous and it is true that some minorities make comments regarding the white majority that are out of line. There is a mature, adult way to discuss the topic in an inoffensive way. I suggest you get yourself educated enough to participate in these types of discussions before you start talking.
"'black' "people" ostensibly resemble gorillas/apes/chimpanzees/monkeys/etc. and are 'lesser-than-rodents. Their STD, crime, dropout, out of wedlock rates are astronomically high. They have been in this country for generations, and, despite MASSIVE and EXTREME affirmative action help, they are in the bottom of society. For this reason, in conjunction wtih the fact that many races (who came here GENERATIONS after them) with substantially more barriers cam
@BillA1016 e here, are moving forward, and repudiate the 'black' argument, provokes an extreme sense of jealousy among these 'lesser-than-rodents'. This deep jealousy manifests itself in very serious and damaging ways. You see people getting sued-for-pants, you see countless more lives being ruined by monkeys (the rate is lower with Whites -- you just hear about their cases more [Duke lacrosse, DSK, etc.]); this all stems from this deep jealousy monkeys have
@BillA1016 Having said the 'mature' way, let me say again that this jehmu gorilla kinda irritates me bc one of my biggest pet peeves is when a gorilla, or even a 'very unattractive human' goes around thinking she's hot
Her nose is so gorilla-like wide that I can't help but to stare at it with digust and with a sour face
Funn how she says the commercial has a bias. Are you kidding me?!?! Of course it does, her decision saved someone who is an inspiration to millions! This lady is a devout eugenics followers
I wonder how many babies have been aborted on doctor advice that would have turned out dying in infancy or at birth. I guess we'll never know. Although, maybe we should start keeping track of miscarriages and periods as abortions as well.
Even if I were an O'Reilly fan I would find this unwatchable. His constant interruptions in that straining tone make it too uncomfortable to listen to. I dont understand why more guests dont just walk off. There's no point in being there.
As usual, Bill could have used his strong influence to incite a provocative, intelligent conversation....but as usual he didn't let someone with whom he disagrees actually complete a sentence...so as usual it was a complete waste of time.
I'm very much pro-choice, and I can't stand O'Reilly, but I have to say that I agree with him on this one (as much as I hate to admit it). Pro-life advertisements have as much right to exist as pro-choice ones, and encouraging to choose not to abort is NOT the same thing as attempting to take away the right to choose. As long as abortion remains legal, let pro-life advocates do their best to try to promote life (as long as they don't resort to misinformation).
@Stoogewatcher She's speaking out for pro-choice. So your saying that a woman with a problematic pregnancy shouldn't have the choice to end it or not..... that it should be followed through blindly regardless of the consequences?! The woman in this, Jehmu, said that Mrs. Tebow's success should be celebrated, that it is a joyous occasion, which it is. But in other cases it may not result in such a happy event, and women faced with situations like this should have a choice!
So, is it that CBS is not approving ads by atheist groups or something? Because I have no problem with the ad nor do I have a problem with it airing during the Super Bowl, but atheist groups should have the same right then, if they care to put up the money... It seemed like O'Reily was dancing around the real problem when he says things like "Do you have a problem with Tim Tebow being alive?" (not the exact quote, but along those lines). Poor journalism.
Abortion is murder, the argument has been misguided from the start.
Do you think she has a right because it is a health issue?
If this were true then sex would be an insurable act, and health insurance companies would have to pay out if she got pregnant. Just as Auto insurance companies pay out for accidents right?
Bill O’Reilly, citing the New England Journal of Medicine stated that “46.3% May Leave Medical Profession” and “If half of the nation’s doctors are considering bailing on the profession if Obama-care passes, that is a frightening consequence.”
The New England Journal of Medicine states that they never produced a health care survey!
Everything NOW does isn't all bad, everything FOCUS ON THE FAMILY does isn't all bad either. This lady needs to calm down, it seems like she doesn't want to get rid of abortion at all...NOW's focus should be helping and figuring out other ways to help women with unwanted pregnancies.
@SCJohnson77 I was gonna ask you why do you have to be racist, but then i went on ur page and saw Htler so i guess i already know there's no hope for you. So sad
How ironic that an African-American woman is speaking for the pro-abortion side, especially since the abortionist movement was founded by a white supremacist.
wow im going to pray for you people tonight.this lady is a lost soul and will one day see the error of her ways...everyone should realize the power or prayer.
@qarohc Jehmu Greene is a fascist, pro-abortion, free-speech-hating tool. How ironic that an African-American woman is speaking for the pro-abortion side, especially since the abortionist movement was founded by a white supremacist.
What exactly is the argument against pro life? Come on people. Think about it the ad is about not murdering unborn babies period. It is not about taking rights away from women.
Continually astounded at how much of an idiot Bill is!
Any idiot(except Bill), whether pro choice or pro life, could see this ad as promoting pro life. As one of the most polarized topics around the ad can't but help be anti pro choice. The argument is, why is it being showed during superbowl based on past criteria for ads in these sort after slots. For this it does deserve a little bit of 'head scratching' and discussion.
"offended Tim is alive?..." !?!? Bill is dangerous.
What an a-hole. So if your doctor advises you that your pregnancy could endanger your health or the baby's health, you should ignore their advice and instead believe an old book full of misogyny and hatred.
Oh wait, he didn't specifically mention the bible--I guess I'm just a hateful infidel.
I can't believe people are brainwashed enough to believe this jerk's BS.
I'll admit my opinion is biased--I'm a white male.
Shut the fuck up Bill, you jackass. Let her speak. He always does this bullshit. He is just scared that this women would sound slightly convincing to his audience.
O'Reilly: "Are you offended that Tim Tebow is alive?" You dumb shit. Why does this fool still have a show? Nothing is ever gained from O'Reilly's "discussion" style. Wake up, America. This isn't dialogue, it isn't debate, and it sure as hell isn't productive. We need smarter media!
@reeged Bill O'Reilly is clearly correct on this issue. Tebow's mom is simply stating that she chose life over abortion and it worked for her. She never says "I think abortion should be illegal" in any way, shape, or form throughout the ad.
Is she offended that Tebow is still alive, Mr. OReilly? You betcha!
It has always bothered me that when liberal organizations get themselves criticized by those that do not like their agenda they blow a gasket. That includes the organization that this woman represents and Planned Parenthood (what a joke that name is), as well as others. They love to scream "Hate!" but yet it is them that do the hating and killing (in this case, of unborn children).
All societies that sanction abortion are in severe demographic meltdown - but pretend they are not!! They are getting what they gave - death! No wonder they don't want to admit it - choice has backfired it seems! LOL!
Only a CATHOLIC STATE - foundational state of the west - will resist your demographic wipeout and Islamisation at the hands of idiot secular governance!! Only the good survive you know!
It's ok we can just kill the muslims to cut down their numbers. Would be preferable to live in a child raping, pro death via AIDS without condoms, pro nazi catholic state. Actually considering the millions the pope is killing with his anti condom killing mission and the millions the nazi's killed with Pope Pius XII's support, killing all muslims should fit right in. Just the sort of thing the catho's go for.
No- you can't kill innocent people - you are a hypocrite! First you wanted to kill your own unborn children - then when Islam was employed to take their place - you decided to kill them too! I'm afraid life doesn't respond to all this killing - in the end you are killing your own nation! As you sow - so shall you reap! And secularists are the spreaders of AIDS and all STDs! Faithful Catholics do not get or give AIDS :P Secularists are history's losers!!
Catholics love killing people, Hitler was catholic. The only reason they want to stop abortion is so they have more children to rape. They don't even have to deny themselves publically and then do meth and gay hookers like Ted Haggard, catholics don't need to worry about being caught, they had too many young boys to bugger in safety and protection of the church. And the pope, wanting to kill all those millions of black people in africa by banning condoms - gets 'em to heaven quicker.
I guess it's only been 70 years since the catholic church was involved in a holocaust - time for another one.. At least these ones are black eh? Won't be as hard to the jews. Nazi Youth Benedict must have learnt his lesson. I wonder how many mroe interns catholic Bill O'Reilly is going to abuse. Get that loofah ready! you must be thanking the lord almighty it wasn't young boys like all the other catholic rapists.
Sorry - but the Holocaust was committed by atheists! yes Catholics were involved too - and they shouldn't have been - but we have a recent history of supporting atheist politicians and their evil agendas! This must stop! We must only support a Catholic State - if we are really Catholics! Remember - we are the founders and true defenders of the West - atheists are its evil destroyers! Oh and true Catholics don't get or give AIDS! Only secularists do that! Ugggh!
Nope, Nazi's wore "God is with us" on their uniforms while they killed jews and the Catholic church supported killing all the christ killers. Sorry, thanks for playing, come back when you educate yourself ;)
Nope - they did not serve Christ (God Himself) - they wanted God to serve them! I get it all the time - atheists want Catholics to support them and their evil agendas! No more! Never again!
CATHOLIC STATE forever - cos only the good survive!
Bill O'Riely is an idiot, while the ad may have a 'positive' message the motive for which it was created is not positive it is backwards, it only serves to undermine the choice a woman has with her own body. This ad is a wolf in sheeps clothing.
This is rediculous... isn't it a woman's right to choose to tell the story of the choice she made and the story of what happened afterward? The rhetoric just doesn't add up...
Okay fine eh? Guess there should have been a second part to the commercial: "I decided to have sex with the first guy at a party, and got pregnant. Used my abortion rights to go in and have that little inconvenience ripped arm and leg apart and dumped like garbage into a bloody pail... death... what a convenient choice..."
Even though im pro-choice, I think they should be able to run the add but after that they should have a condom add as well. But im sure Bill would have a problem with that.
Bill is a Libertarian, not a Republican. I'm fairly certain he would be okay with letting any condom company that would pony up the money air their ad. It's the Libertarian way, and why he's not against things like the legalization of marijuana.
Neither, I'm well informed. What about you? Go back and research his views on civil liberties (and libertarian ideology in general), and think about how intelligent your last post makes you sound. I'll be happy to e-mail you my certified intellectual and educational credentials if you send yours 1st. GBU Still, M.†
If you watched his full program instead of just listening to small clips that liberals post to make him seem crazy and read opinion pages that diss him, you will see that he really isn't that republican. He attacks both sides if he doesn't agree with them.
Have YOU ever watched an entire O'Really?! program that Includes a guest with an opposing view? He's just a big blowhard bully who does not allow the opposition to bring any facts and he RARELY lets them finish a thought to give voice to their opinion. Braying Jack-ass is the best description for his type of interviewing style.
I watch almost every night. If someone doesn't answer the question and tries to side steps it, he calls them on it. I don't see anything wrong with that. If you can't handle it, that's your problem. There are many times where he has people of an opposing view on his show and he is tough on the interview, but still respect them/their opinion. Seems like you are pretty selective about it.
I would simply repeat what I said before except that you are a blind follower of his type - probably of Palin too - and see nothing wrong with their method of communication which is all ONE-SIDED. They don't bother with the other side of an argument or discussion because they are incapable of processing anything beyond the most recent thing they have studied that goes along with their values. Bill talks over people even after he has asked them a question. Respect?! Cutting off mic / hanging up?
Again, Politics aren't so simple, lol. No, I don't like Palin. She seems a nice lady, but I don't think she belongs in politics. I think that if you watch what Bill clips there are on here you will see. If you watch his show, the times when he cuts people off because they don't ANSWER the question. They are talking around it. I don't know why you can't get that into your thick skull. If someone says something that isn't true or is BS he calls them on it. It's a debate program. Get over it!
Anti-choice is NOT running the ad. She chose one way.. others can choose another. If you don't allow any other options than abortion, how is that being pro-choice?
silverakisame- when two people have a debate and one of them uses a loaded word, such as "anti-choice" to describe their opponents they make whats called a "straw man argument" where they can't have civil discorse and simply try to demonize the other person, the same could be said if someone who is anti-war is simply dismissed as someone who "hates the troops", it's not all black & white
Silverakisame- I am objecting to the woman who Bill O'Reilly was interviewing, I am saying that for Jehmu to label anyone who disagrees with her as ANTI-CHOICE shows she isn't interested in hearing any other point of view than those who agree with her. If you believe abortion is a womans right than I may disagree with you, but I won't just dismiss you as being "against babies", people need to have civil debate's about things, and not just lob hate words at eachother.
No, it will tell them that they can make their own choice, and don't have to be terrorized into abortion by what their Dr. or anyone else says. It does not tell them they are obligated, absolutely must, or even should give up their health. It tells a WONDERFUL story, and leaves it up to each individual viewer to decide what to do with that story.
I'm not saying its not a great story. I'm saying there are people who are so easily influenced buy these simple stories. This situation isn't a perfect example for all people/ scenarios. It depends on the situation, and if someone wasn't smart enough to select what situation it fits, then it becomes a problem.
Good Point. But don't you think those same people will also be influenced by their doctors, family, friends and "significant others", as well as all the planned parenthood, naral, etc. literature and media that will be thrust upon them? It seems like you want every voice to be heard except that voice which advocates for the unborn. Seriously, don't you think 90 percent of the popular media today espouses the opposite viewpoint? No one in the Tebow family is asking for others to be censored.
The gay ad wasn't an advocacy ad. It was promoting a for-profit business the CBS decided most Super Bowl watchers would find offensive. If a pro-gay advocacy group just had a gay couple standing there telling their story (like the Tebow ad), it would be similar and probably be approved. If Tebow and his Mom were making out (like in the gay ad), it would have definitely been disapproved.
i'm torn on such a matter, aborting a baby is denying a being life, yet not aborting could be subjecting a baby to a bad life, in the instances that the parents don't want it, or it has defects
and also, one example, a woman is raped, and falls pregnant, should she be forced to have that reminder for the next nine months, on the other hand, should the baby be denied life, because it would otherwise cause the mother pretty bad discomfort.
yes, i'm all for putting a child up for adoption instead of abortion, however, if you know a baby will have a serious life altering defect, should the baby be given life? no matter how hard that life would be?
People with disabilities can still be happier (I would argue more happy) than many of the people who are "normal". If there is a family out there who is experienced with those kind of children and will give them love and the care that they need, I think it would be fine.
Who the F--- do you think you are to make such an uneducated, unfeeling statement as that?
When did you ever live with or raise a child with severe birth-defects? How many families are there out there available to take on that monumental task? Know any??? Is your experience limited to "Extreme Home Make-over"?
Get off my cloud!
Talk about something you actually have experience with!
Sorry for the language. Just a bit frustrated following much "dialoging" with "silver" who has cast aspersions herslef.
Look throughout this "comments" blog and you will see my opinion which is based on the fact that no one had seen the ad in question and that O'Really!? did not give equal opportunity to Jehmu Greene to explain why there was opposition to the ad (in a nut-shell).
My pastor had a son with down's syndrome. Sure it was tough, but he was a bright child and was loved by the whole congregation. I don't see how he couldn't have been happy. Again, I said they CAN be. Not that all are, etc. Please read again. I've also worked with disabled kids tutoring them. I think many of them are able to see a world we don't grasp because we are too concerned with appearance and superficialities. There are families out there who adopt only special needs kids too.
there's some disabilities that a parent or caregiver would have to give their own lives for, 24/7 care of a child in a wheelchair with next to no motor skills, should the parent give up their social life for this child to experience a half life?
and then i return to the rape case, some mothers come to the brink of suicide when pregnant with the baby of a rapist, they dread the day the baby could come looking for it's mother, a mother who couldn't look the child in the face.
Look at the percentage of women who give an abortion due to rape they are small, if a lwas was passed to outlaw abortion only if you were raped or life in danger rape case would go through the roof, its not a good argument about 85% of abortion are due to a mother not wanting the baby due to a mistake. FACTS!
abortion should not be aloud just because you don't want a baby, if there is a true impact on the mother, then yes, abortion is an option but just cause the baby was an accident?
the mother doesn't have to keep the baby, sure, the baby doesn't know any better, but that doesn't mean denying it life is a good option, especially when the number of babies being denied such life is so high.
Again, it's a choice the parents have to make. Some of them don't care about a "social life" and care more about the child. It's a choice. If the woman was raped, she has to make the choice. I'm just saying adoption is AN option that should be considered. If someone else wants to get an abortion, go for it. But the emotional/mental affects are just as lasting and horrible as putting it up for adoption and worrying about seeing the baby. All choices are difficult. It's about what she wants.
about the social life, yes indeed, if they don't care about their own life, to bring up a child that cannot fend for themselves for life, then fine, help that child life what life they can.
and about putting the baby that was the product of rape up for adoption, that's pretty much what i said.
but a normal baby, that was simply not wanted, shouldn't be aloud to be aborted, the baby may not have feelings at the time, but it'd be taking away the opportunity for it to have any at all.
I'm highly entertained by all the folks claiming the ad says this, the ad says that, oh I'm so offended...when the ad hasn't run yet, no one beyond a few folks at CBS has sen it, but we're all supposed to believe you've all got magic crystal balls that can peer into the future. Ya know, you'd think that if you could see ahead to Super Bowl Sunday, you'd at least tell us who's gonna win the game, so we can make a ton of money betting on it like they did in Back To The Future II.
I think Bill did a great job. The ad isn't saying that abortion is wrong, simply that abortion isn't the only answer. Pro-choice groups don't want to celebrate anything good coming from a decision to keep a baby. Pro-choice should be pro-choice, instead of being pro-abortion.
I'm pro-choice myself, though I wouldn't get an abortion myself because I couldn't handle it, I do think it's okay for people to have that choice. So let people make that choice! Abortion isn't always the answer!
"Pro-choice groups don't want to celebrate anything good coming from a decision to keep a baby."
That kind of all-inclusive statement is ridiculous, untrue and you know it. Pro-choice groups like Planned Parenthood have been helping women in crisis with their choice (whether to keep or abort) for MANY years longer than Focus on the Family has been around.
Besides, the big brouhaha began because someone thought it was not an appropriate topic for a family venue - I include ED ads.
Then why are they offended by the ad? Why do they care about it? Planned Parenthood is useful sure, but to deny the fact that they promote abortion is to be blind. One of the main goals is to "protect" abortion rights. How this commercial offends that I don't know.
It doesn't matter who's been around longer. I don't see how it's not appropriate. It just celebrates his life. What is so damn offensive about that? It's just his story! I'm pro-choice, and I think both options should be exposed.
AGAIN - HAVE YOU SEEN THE AD? If you haven't you have no leg to stand on!
The topic of unplanned pregnancy and how those involved determine the outcome is NOT a topic most families would like to have over the buffalo wings and guacamole!
I have seen the ad. It's tame. It barely even mentions anything. I don't see why you are so offended. You didn't see it either. It's a perfectly family oriented commercial. She just talks about her relationship with her son. Btw, if you were more informed, you would know that it wasn't an unplanned pregnancy, simply a pregnancy that she could have die by going through with it. Please get your facts straight. You sound foolish.
When did you see the ad? During the football game? (which would mean it was after your post from this discussion so don't give yourself so much credit!) I have NEVER seen the ad and NEVER claimed to have seen it. I just said that you had no business giving it credence without having seen it. Who sounds foolish?
I saw it before, because it was posted ONLINE. Maybe if you bothered to check before writing it off as a huge "threat" to society and families, you wouldn't look so silly now.
And age doesn't matter. You can be old and misinformed (stupid) just as easily. :)
Re. age: being misinformed is not necessarily the same as being stupid (I will make an exception for: Bush & Palin supporters and O'Really?!-philes.), you simply exhibit as much understanding of political discourse as someone with a very limited background in politics and/ or world views. I'll give you a chance: What do you think of "Cap-and-trade"? Can you answer without mouthing some "talking points" fed to you via O'Really?!?
i don't get why a pro choice group is upset about a pro life add...after all if they're pro choice and this ad is not about taking away that choice then they should be all for it...pro choice means you agree with the right to both abort and not abort...so there really should be no issue me thinks unless by pro choice you mean that anyone who is against abortion is an ignorant idiot hick...which is most likely the case
You are naive to think that the man and the money behind this ad (Focus on the Family) has no agenda. He will obtain public sentiment first, and then he will try and pass a law against abortion. Get real please! He wants to take away a woman's right to choose. Period. After this, he will go after gay people. You watch and don't be so fooled.
#1. Bill is an idiot. "beef". Really Bill? That is such unprofessional language I could just about cry.
#2. He does not understand because he doesn't want to understand. Choice means to be able to abort or to not abort. It is about a woman being able to decide. Not the governement. The same argumet is made about guns. They say it is their choice to own a gun or not. Not the government.
Good to see such an unbiased interviewer allowing his invited guest to get a word in edgewise. Why should we want to listen to her? After all we only need O'Reilly's opinion.
It's not pro-choice, it is pro-abortion. Let Planned Parenthood put up a video showing the positive effects of an aborted child. Fair is fair I say!!!
Funny, most people who are pro-choice say they are not for abortion but for the woman's rights... ok with that being said, why are people upset over the ad? Sounds to me like a choice, which Mrs. Tebow made and because she chose to keep the baby it's wrong? Should they be fair and air a commercial with a woman who aborted her baby? Give me a break.
What Mother EVER tells her child I was supposed to ABORT you but I decided not to? How about a mother with an agenda and a child with out any sort of shame who want to use their twisted relationship to generate money?
No Mom in her right mind would ever tell her kid "I was supposed to abort YOU.....fucking shameless....
So you're all for a mother lying to her child instead of being truthful? How does it harm the child? The mother says "the doctors wanted me to abort you but I wanted to keep you," how is that bad? She's letting the child know she loved them enough that she would rather give the child a fighting chance. That to me sounds like ultimate love.
@scarebear83 No I'm a Mother and I would never tell me child he was in danger of being aborted when I was pregnant with him....this ad is bullshit or Mom has some mental issues....
Im not pro life, because without the mother, the baby could never be, so ultimately, its the woman's choice to have the baby or not. But, there is no reason to censor TV based on someone's opposing position. Like so many have said: Freedom of Speech
Why doesn't Tim Tebow do a real Christian/faith based ad on helping the poor, hungry, and homeless? The USA/Superbowl culture seems to be about Friday Night Lights, women with large fake breasts, beer and Viagra. Most of the "Christians" I observe are bigoted, self-serving and hypocrital, which is the antithesis of Jesus' teachings. Real Christians live by their actions, not Superbowl ads. Sorry, Tim Tebow, golden boy.
its doing no such thing. Its promoting a website for people that are gay to find happy lives. Even if more people were gay so what? that just means less for the population and more homes for children that don't have any.
Ok, I will admit, what i said below was just a joke. That being said, I don't think this ad about Tim Tebow is really an anti-choice ad. It's gives a GOOD reason not to be pro-choice, but it's doing it by telling a story, not by shoving it down your throat. That being said, the gay ad should be reserved for a channel and time that less young children will be watching.
I definitely agree with you about the beer ads. On the other hand, you saying "well they did this so we should be able to do that," doesn't hold much water.
I do to an extent. But I also think it's necessary. The parents should be the ones to educate their children on any given subject, not ads on TV. Unfortunately, so many parents just don't give a crap, and the child is educated by TV and end up acting like what they see on commercials or even in violent movies.
people who advocate "choice" tacitly support abortion by making that decision available legally, by fighting for the right to make that specific choice
Also, why does Mrs. Women talk about women's health during this debate?
The debate is about ABORTION not about HEALTH.
Women usually choose abortion in order to not have children. If you don't want a child, that doesn't relate to health, just relates to decisions about time management and other things that children raising requires.
She thinks that an ad arguing for women to chose life is taking away rights even though it's arguing for women to chose something, not arguing for laws banning choice.
Haha, I'm entirely serious, I wish someone would debate me on this. You can get raped in the Philippines and you still have to carry the baby. Since '87, they do have exceptions if the *mother's* life is immediately threatened, which I understand that it was not in this case since according to Tebow's story, it was "recommended to avoid damage to the child." This whole thing seems like a huge distortion of the truth in order for the anti-choice movement to capitalize on Tim Tebow's fame.
Jehmu should be called shamoo and all she and all her liberal pieces of shit want to do is control any and everything... All you libs around the world do everyone around the world a favor and step out in-front of a bus already...
GottaBeekiddin 1 week ago
Calling abortion murder is like calling masturbation genocide.
owenwestland 1 week ago
I'm pro-choice, in that I don't believe a fetus is a being until there is a heartbeat. Unless it is completely necessary, you shouldn't abort after this point. But pro-lifers need to be free to speak as well.
thylacinegurl 1 week ago
for once o'reilly is actually right. there's nothing wrong with the ad and it isn't controversial at all. but he's still an a-hole, of course. never seen someone who couldn't keep his mouth closed for less time.
dmcarefuldriver 2 weeks ago
I'm Pro-Choice but the the Pro-Life people have just as much right to speak their piece as any other leftist group. We are all humans and we all deserve respect. Some of these comments are so ignorant that they make me ashamed to call myself human.
bobbyjones000098 1 month ago
The female silverback only gets on FOX to try to take up for our Liar N Chief
She is a complete idiot, I dont know why FOX would even let her on any of their shows
MrJMBrowning 1 month ago in playlist Jehmu Greene on Fox News
The ad was a emotional jerker - nothing all.
QuestionRenee 2 months ago
The black woman is an idiot.
BEARARMZ 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck Shamoo Green. She is living in a fantasy world...like all libs.
JunkMan16 4 months ago in playlist Jehmu Greene on Fox News
Commercial was offensive to maybe 1% of the American population....only the sensitive emotional princesses had a fit over it
Thundermine2 5 months ago
Jehmu Greene you are a classy woman. Racists and idiots will be racists and idiots. But I still disagree with you, I dislike Focus on the Family, but the commercial wasn't offensive. It was a good commercial and I agree with what it was saying. I don't think that women get abortions unless medically necessary.
9zreed 5 months ago
"i think you're trying to muzzle them!!' he says, as he interrupts her...such utter hypocrisy.
TheBeezusjones 5 months ago
I DON'T KNOW WHY GORILLAS PUT MAKEUP ON THEMSELVES IT'S KINDA GROSS TRUE STORY
Eleetnessful 7 months ago
@Eleetnessful You're gross and I don't understand why you keep saying true story.
Disregarded388 7 months ago
@Disregarded388 YOUR FACE IS GROSS. ALMOST AS GROSS AS THIS GORILLA WITH A HUGE OPEN NOSE (GORILLA NOSE) AND HUGE LIPS (GORILLA LIPS) AND PUBICHAIR ON HEAD
TRUE STORY
Eleetnessful 7 months ago
LIKE A TYPICAL MONKEY, I CAN'T HELP BUT TO STARE AT HER HUGE OPEN NOSE WITH A SOUR, DISGUSTED, AND SICKENING EXPRESSION TRUE STORY
SEE, WITH NIGGERS, THEY'VE LITERALLY HAD HUMANS BEND OVER BACKWARDS FOR THEM THE MOMENT THEY CAME OUT OF THEIR GORILLA MOMMY VAGINAS SO IF YOU LISTEN TO THEM THEY'RE ALWAYS SAYING "THERE'S STILL INEQUALITY IN THIS COUNTRY!" (IMPLYING: 'WHITE PPL, YOU OWE US MORE SHIT!') OR "THEY (RICH) NEED TO 'SHARE' MORE!' IT'S SO INTERWOVEN IN THE FABRIC OF NIGGERS TRUE STORY
Eleetnessful 7 months ago
@Eleetnessful Whats a Nigger?
dominiaue 7 months ago
@Eleetnessful There are some racism arguments that are ridiculous and it is true that some minorities make comments regarding the white majority that are out of line. There is a mature, adult way to discuss the topic in an inoffensive way. I suggest you get yourself educated enough to participate in these types of discussions before you start talking.
BillA1016 7 months ago
@BillA1016 Ok fine: mature adult way:
"'black' "people" ostensibly resemble gorillas/apes/chimpanzees/monkeys/etc. and are 'lesser-than-rodents. Their STD, crime, dropout, out of wedlock rates are astronomically high. They have been in this country for generations, and, despite MASSIVE and EXTREME affirmative action help, they are in the bottom of society. For this reason, in conjunction wtih the fact that many races (who came here GENERATIONS after them) with substantially more barriers cam
Eleetnessful 7 months ago
@BillA1016 e here, are moving forward, and repudiate the 'black' argument, provokes an extreme sense of jealousy among these 'lesser-than-rodents'. This deep jealousy manifests itself in very serious and damaging ways. You see people getting sued-for-pants, you see countless more lives being ruined by monkeys (the rate is lower with Whites -- you just hear about their cases more [Duke lacrosse, DSK, etc.]); this all stems from this deep jealousy monkeys have
TRUST ME. This is real
Eleetnessful 7 months ago
@BillA1016 Having said the 'mature' way, let me say again that this jehmu gorilla kinda irritates me bc one of my biggest pet peeves is when a gorilla, or even a 'very unattractive human' goes around thinking she's hot
Her nose is so gorilla-like wide that I can't help but to stare at it with digust and with a sour face
OOH OOH AHH AHH!!!
Eleetnessful 7 months ago
Bill O'Reilly should have stuck to entertainment news, although he sucked at that as well.
Ruhlmann1 8 months ago
Funn how she says the commercial has a bias. Are you kidding me?!?! Of course it does, her decision saved someone who is an inspiration to millions! This lady is a devout eugenics followers
2727taterbug 8 months ago
the family doesn't have an anti-choice agenda, they have an anti-death agenda!!
tito8512 9 months ago
I wonder how many babies have been aborted on doctor advice that would have turned out dying in infancy or at birth. I guess we'll never know. Although, maybe we should start keeping track of miscarriages and periods as abortions as well.
Xwowplaya 9 months ago
she got owned at the end, "are you offended that he is alive? that his mom didn't kill him??? oh uhhh uhh tv executives blah blah.........owned....
Bill should of also stated abortion kills more black people in less than a year than all the deaths the KKK did in history
hemet92544 10 months ago
Even if I were an O'Reilly fan I would find this unwatchable. His constant interruptions in that straining tone make it too uncomfortable to listen to. I dont understand why more guests dont just walk off. There's no point in being there.
BubbleGumNipples 1 year ago
Fox News: We respect your opinion, now shut up and let me tell you what your opinion should be. :)
Kiru26 1 year ago
Fox News... Come to the interview and let US tell YOU what WE think.
Kiru26 1 year ago
As usual, Bill could have used his strong influence to incite a provocative, intelligent conversation....but as usual he didn't let someone with whom he disagrees actually complete a sentence...so as usual it was a complete waste of time.
peduzzi89 1 year ago
I'm very much pro-choice, and I can't stand O'Reilly, but I have to say that I agree with him on this one (as much as I hate to admit it). Pro-life advertisements have as much right to exist as pro-choice ones, and encouraging to choose not to abort is NOT the same thing as attempting to take away the right to choose. As long as abortion remains legal, let pro-life advocates do their best to try to promote life (as long as they don't resort to misinformation).
burchdc 1 year ago 4
@jbond5150 It is a living, growing being.
ransche1 1 year ago
Comment removed
ransche1 1 year ago
they all dont turn out as football stars, folks.
jbond5150 1 year ago
Let's be honest. Pro-choice is the choice to kill your baby.
ransche1 1 year ago
@ransche1 you think a group of cells at the time of conception is a baby?
jbond5150 1 year ago
@ransche1 Pro choice is the choice to kill, or not to kill your baby. Let's be honest
Trailslayer 1 year ago
@Stoogewatcher She's speaking out for pro-choice. So your saying that a woman with a problematic pregnancy shouldn't have the choice to end it or not..... that it should be followed through blindly regardless of the consequences?! The woman in this, Jehmu, said that Mrs. Tebow's success should be celebrated, that it is a joyous occasion, which it is. But in other cases it may not result in such a happy event, and women faced with situations like this should have a choice!
Pookie7985 1 year ago 2
So, is it that CBS is not approving ads by atheist groups or something? Because I have no problem with the ad nor do I have a problem with it airing during the Super Bowl, but atheist groups should have the same right then, if they care to put up the money... It seemed like O'Reily was dancing around the real problem when he says things like "Do you have a problem with Tim Tebow being alive?" (not the exact quote, but along those lines). Poor journalism.
BrentonSteinhilber 1 year ago
Murder of a child is not a woman's right!
Murder of an unborn child is?
Abortion is murder, the argument has been misguided from the start.
Do you think she has a right because it is a health issue?
If this were true then sex would be an insurable act, and health insurance companies would have to pay out if she got pregnant. Just as Auto insurance companies pay out for accidents right?
PoorMansPlato 1 year ago
O'Reilly is a flat out liar..
Bill O’Reilly, citing the New England Journal of Medicine stated that “46.3% May Leave Medical Profession” and “If half of the nation’s doctors are considering bailing on the profession if Obama-care passes, that is a frightening consequence.”
The New England Journal of Medicine states that they never produced a health care survey!
vukodlok1 1 year ago
Everything NOW does isn't all bad, everything FOCUS ON THE FAMILY does isn't all bad either. This lady needs to calm down, it seems like she doesn't want to get rid of abortion at all...NOW's focus should be helping and figuring out other ways to help women with unwanted pregnancies.
Creationcreed 1 year ago
what an ugly fat black female liberal animal
SCJohnson77 1 year ago
@SCJohnson77 how rude
TheAtheistKate 1 year ago
@SCJohnson77 I was gonna ask you why do you have to be racist, but then i went on ur page and saw Htler so i guess i already know there's no hope for you. So sad
lilltigger7 1 year ago
Bill O'Reilly doesn't bow to a bunch of PC BS and tells it like it is in this video.
Kudos to him for doing so....
wldchld7 1 year ago 2
Billo is a dodo
max2right 1 year ago
@TheSidney1961 The only bitch is you for being a pro-abortion fascist.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
@StoogeWatcher AMEN
SCJohnson77 1 year ago
How ironic that an African-American woman is speaking for the pro-abortion side, especially since the abortionist movement was founded by a white supremacist.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
wow im going to pray for you people tonight.this lady is a lost soul and will one day see the error of her ways...everyone should realize the power or prayer.
mbornholdtful 1 year ago
This woman is a fucking saint, how can she speak so calmly with this moron interrupting every sentence she spoke?
qarohc 1 year ago 2
@qarohc Jehmu Greene is a fascist, pro-abortion, free-speech-hating tool. How ironic that an African-American woman is speaking for the pro-abortion side, especially since the abortionist movement was founded by a white supremacist.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
@StoogeWatcher
Ad Hominem-
Got nothing to say so you just insult the character of the person, tells me something about where you are coming from.
qarohc 1 year ago
THAT WOMAN IS A FUCKING CUNT!
gonavy505 2 years ago
What exactly is the argument against pro life? Come on people. Think about it the ad is about not murdering unborn babies period. It is not about taking rights away from women.
b102175 2 years ago
Continually astounded at how much of an idiot Bill is!
Any idiot(except Bill), whether pro choice or pro life, could see this ad as promoting pro life. As one of the most polarized topics around the ad can't but help be anti pro choice. The argument is, why is it being showed during superbowl based on past criteria for ads in these sort after slots. For this it does deserve a little bit of 'head scratching' and discussion.
"offended Tim is alive?..." !?!? Bill is dangerous.
richdorks73 2 years ago
I love how O'Reilly thinks he's engaging in "debate." Someone get this man a fucking dictionary.
okumabear 2 years ago
What an a-hole. So if your doctor advises you that your pregnancy could endanger your health or the baby's health, you should ignore their advice and instead believe an old book full of misogyny and hatred.
Oh wait, he didn't specifically mention the bible--I guess I'm just a hateful infidel.
I can't believe people are brainwashed enough to believe this jerk's BS.
I'll admit my opinion is biased--I'm a white male.
tctheunbeliever 2 years ago
Shut the fuck up Bill, you jackass. Let her speak. He always does this bullshit. He is just scared that this women would sound slightly convincing to his audience.
whitietothe 2 years ago 3
THis lady is CRAZY. Obvoiusly Mrs. Tebow was given the choice and she chose wisely. What is so controversial about loving life?
chovies123 2 years ago
My friend bet their life savings on a one in a thousand poker hand at the casino.
He now lives in a $4million house and drives a Ferrari. He was given a choice and he chose wisely.........Or was he lucky.
Based on the little information I have about Mrs Tebow, your comment seems a little crazy.
I hope you know more about Mrs Tebow's story than I do.
richdorks73 2 years ago
O'Reilly: "Are you offended that Tim Tebow is alive?" You dumb shit. Why does this fool still have a show? Nothing is ever gained from O'Reilly's "discussion" style. Wake up, America. This isn't dialogue, it isn't debate, and it sure as hell isn't productive. We need smarter media!
drumrnva 2 years ago 2
children are an heritage from the Lord. Abortion is murder it is a living person, and you kill it that is murder it don't get any simpler than that
Abortion is murder
MrSeanhoyt 2 years ago
Bill O'Reilly is an embarrassment to journalism. He invites a woman to his show and proceeds to interrupt everything she tries to say.
reeged 2 years ago 20
@reeged Pro-abortion groups were the ones embarrassed.
StoogeWatcher 1 year ago
@reeged it's because the bitch is evil EVIL.
CpsLock3 1 year ago 2
@reeged Bill O'Reilly is clearly correct on this issue. Tebow's mom is simply stating that she chose life over abortion and it worked for her. She never says "I think abortion should be illegal" in any way, shape, or form throughout the ad.
bobbyjones000098 1 month ago
Abortion is murder!!!!!
MrSeanhoyt 2 years ago
actually its not
Celticking36 2 years ago 7
@Celticking36 not what?
FlyinSpaghettiMnstr7 1 year ago
Is she offended that Tebow is still alive, Mr. OReilly? You betcha!
It has always bothered me that when liberal organizations get themselves criticized by those that do not like their agenda they blow a gasket. That includes the organization that this woman represents and Planned Parenthood (what a joke that name is), as well as others. They love to scream "Hate!" but yet it is them that do the hating and killing (in this case, of unborn children).
gkpirate 2 years ago
it's not o'reily who is the mouth breather for asking questions like "are you offended Tebow is alive?"
The real retards are the ones who think the red herrings are relevant.
Thats why Bill uses em so often.
O'Reilly
tehKap0w 2 years ago
All societies that sanction abortion are in severe demographic meltdown - but pretend they are not!! They are getting what they gave - death! No wonder they don't want to admit it - choice has backfired it seems! LOL!
Only a CATHOLIC STATE - foundational state of the west - will resist your demographic wipeout and Islamisation at the hands of idiot secular governance!! Only the good survive you know!
amaqula 2 years ago
@amaqula
It's ok we can just kill the muslims to cut down their numbers. Would be preferable to live in a child raping, pro death via AIDS without condoms, pro nazi catholic state. Actually considering the millions the pope is killing with his anti condom killing mission and the millions the nazi's killed with Pope Pius XII's support, killing all muslims should fit right in. Just the sort of thing the catho's go for.
bhutos 2 years ago
No- you can't kill innocent people - you are a hypocrite! First you wanted to kill your own unborn children - then when Islam was employed to take their place - you decided to kill them too! I'm afraid life doesn't respond to all this killing - in the end you are killing your own nation! As you sow - so shall you reap! And secularists are the spreaders of AIDS and all STDs! Faithful Catholics do not get or give AIDS :P Secularists are history's losers!!
CATHOLIC STATE forever!
amaqula 2 years ago
@amaqula
Catholics love killing people, Hitler was catholic. The only reason they want to stop abortion is so they have more children to rape. They don't even have to deny themselves publically and then do meth and gay hookers like Ted Haggard, catholics don't need to worry about being caught, they had too many young boys to bugger in safety and protection of the church. And the pope, wanting to kill all those millions of black people in africa by banning condoms - gets 'em to heaven quicker.
bhutos 2 years ago
@amaqula
I guess it's only been 70 years since the catholic church was involved in a holocaust - time for another one.. At least these ones are black eh? Won't be as hard to the jews. Nazi Youth Benedict must have learnt his lesson. I wonder how many mroe interns catholic Bill O'Reilly is going to abuse. Get that loofah ready! you must be thanking the lord almighty it wasn't young boys like all the other catholic rapists.
bhutos 2 years ago
Sorry - but the Holocaust was committed by atheists! yes Catholics were involved too - and they shouldn't have been - but we have a recent history of supporting atheist politicians and their evil agendas! This must stop! We must only support a Catholic State - if we are really Catholics! Remember - we are the founders and true defenders of the West - atheists are its evil destroyers! Oh and true Catholics don't get or give AIDS! Only secularists do that! Ugggh!
CATHOLIC STATE forever!
amaqula 2 years ago
Nope, Nazi's wore "God is with us" on their uniforms while they killed jews and the Catholic church supported killing all the christ killers. Sorry, thanks for playing, come back when you educate yourself ;)
bhutos 2 years ago
Nope - they did not serve Christ (God Himself) - they wanted God to serve them! I get it all the time - atheists want Catholics to support them and their evil agendas! No more! Never again!
CATHOLIC STATE forever - cos only the good survive!
amaqula 2 years ago
Bill O'Riely is an idiot, while the ad may have a 'positive' message the motive for which it was created is not positive it is backwards, it only serves to undermine the choice a woman has with her own body. This ad is a wolf in sheeps clothing.
gigawebsurfer 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why dont the pro-death abortion lovers make their own commercial with a mother saying how happy she is to have killed her baby?
Oh yeah they cannot find one..
capon33 2 years ago
This is rediculous... isn't it a woman's right to choose to tell the story of the choice she made and the story of what happened afterward? The rhetoric just doesn't add up...
RebornJumpman 2 years ago
The bitch has not even seen this ad and she's already got her panties in a wad.
downpeta 2 years ago
Okay fine eh? Guess there should have been a second part to the commercial: "I decided to have sex with the first guy at a party, and got pregnant. Used my abortion rights to go in and have that little inconvenience ripped arm and leg apart and dumped like garbage into a bloody pail... death... what a convenient choice..."
firebirdhome 2 years ago
I love how people hate this lol
DeJay17Revolution 2 years ago
Wish Jemhu's mom was pro-choice and save us from her idiocy.
cunningcommando 2 years ago
Jemu is another face of fascism.
Spikew0ng 2 years ago
What a stupid and intolerant woman.
thisnamepwnsyours 2 years ago
wow. this lady is an idiot.
buddhajapan 2 years ago
Even though im pro-choice, I think they should be able to run the add but after that they should have a condom add as well. But im sure Bill would have a problem with that.
mentalholocaust 2 years ago
Bill is a Libertarian, not a Republican. I'm fairly certain he would be okay with letting any condom company that would pony up the money air their ad. It's the Libertarian way, and why he's not against things like the legalization of marijuana.
GBU, MDJ. †
BlackJaPanther 2 years ago
@BlackJaPanther LOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!! Are you joking or just stupid?
mentalholocaust 2 years ago
Neither, I'm well informed. What about you? Go back and research his views on civil liberties (and libertarian ideology in general), and think about how intelligent your last post makes you sound. I'll be happy to e-mail you my certified intellectual and educational credentials if you send yours 1st. GBU Still, M.†
BlackJaPanther 2 years ago
If you watched his full program instead of just listening to small clips that liberals post to make him seem crazy and read opinion pages that diss him, you will see that he really isn't that republican. He attacks both sides if he doesn't agree with them.
silverakisame 2 years ago
Have YOU ever watched an entire O'Really?! program that Includes a guest with an opposing view? He's just a big blowhard bully who does not allow the opposition to bring any facts and he RARELY lets them finish a thought to give voice to their opinion. Braying Jack-ass is the best description for his type of interviewing style.
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
I watch almost every night. If someone doesn't answer the question and tries to side steps it, he calls them on it. I don't see anything wrong with that. If you can't handle it, that's your problem. There are many times where he has people of an opposing view on his show and he is tough on the interview, but still respect them/their opinion. Seems like you are pretty selective about it.
silverakisame 2 years ago
I would simply repeat what I said before except that you are a blind follower of his type - probably of Palin too - and see nothing wrong with their method of communication which is all ONE-SIDED. They don't bother with the other side of an argument or discussion because they are incapable of processing anything beyond the most recent thing they have studied that goes along with their values. Bill talks over people even after he has asked them a question. Respect?! Cutting off mic / hanging up?
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
Again, Politics aren't so simple, lol. No, I don't like Palin. She seems a nice lady, but I don't think she belongs in politics. I think that if you watch what Bill clips there are on here you will see. If you watch his show, the times when he cuts people off because they don't ANSWER the question. They are talking around it. I don't know why you can't get that into your thick skull. If someone says something that isn't true or is BS he calls them on it. It's a debate program. Get over it!
silverakisame 2 years ago
ANTI-CHOICE!!!
jakebroadwood 2 years ago
That is the loaded word that Jehmu and her ilk try to label the 50% of Americans who believe that abortion is bad, which it is,
so if she calls me ANTI-CHOICE!
then she will be called
ANTI-LIFE!!!
jakebroadwood 2 years ago
Nah, Just Anti-Baby-Murder.
GBU, MDJ. †
BlackJaPanther 2 years ago
Anti-choice is NOT running the ad. She chose one way.. others can choose another. If you don't allow any other options than abortion, how is that being pro-choice?
silverakisame 2 years ago
silverakisame- when two people have a debate and one of them uses a loaded word, such as "anti-choice" to describe their opponents they make whats called a "straw man argument" where they can't have civil discorse and simply try to demonize the other person, the same could be said if someone who is anti-war is simply dismissed as someone who "hates the troops", it's not all black & white
jakebroadwood 2 years ago
Silverakisame- I am objecting to the woman who Bill O'Reilly was interviewing, I am saying that for Jehmu to label anyone who disagrees with her as ANTI-CHOICE shows she isn't interested in hearing any other point of view than those who agree with her. If you believe abortion is a womans right than I may disagree with you, but I won't just dismiss you as being "against babies", people need to have civil debate's about things, and not just lob hate words at eachother.
jakebroadwood 2 years ago
Having an ad like this will tell women that they are obligated to give up their health for a possible successful birth.
cosmicguy180 2 years ago
No, it will tell them that they can make their own choice, and don't have to be terrorized into abortion by what their Dr. or anyone else says. It does not tell them they are obligated, absolutely must, or even should give up their health. It tells a WONDERFUL story, and leaves it up to each individual viewer to decide what to do with that story.
GBU, MDJ. †
BlackJaPanther 2 years ago
I'm not saying its not a great story. I'm saying there are people who are so easily influenced buy these simple stories. This situation isn't a perfect example for all people/ scenarios. It depends on the situation, and if someone wasn't smart enough to select what situation it fits, then it becomes a problem.
cosmicguy180 2 years ago
Good Point. But don't you think those same people will also be influenced by their doctors, family, friends and "significant others", as well as all the planned parenthood, naral, etc. literature and media that will be thrust upon them? It seems like you want every voice to be heard except that voice which advocates for the unborn. Seriously, don't you think 90 percent of the popular media today espouses the opposite viewpoint? No one in the Tebow family is asking for others to be censored.
BlackJaPanther 2 years ago
Bill wasn't evening listening or concidering her point. He completely ignored her.
CBS is against advocacy ads.
It banned a gay ad.
But it passes a pro-life ad.
Bias!
rexcherry33 2 years ago
The gay ad wasn't an advocacy ad. It was promoting a for-profit business the CBS decided most Super Bowl watchers would find offensive. If a pro-gay advocacy group just had a gay couple standing there telling their story (like the Tebow ad), it would be similar and probably be approved. If Tebow and his Mom were making out (like in the gay ad), it would have definitely been disapproved.
GBU, MDJ. †
BlackJaPanther 2 years ago
i'm torn on such a matter, aborting a baby is denying a being life, yet not aborting could be subjecting a baby to a bad life, in the instances that the parents don't want it, or it has defects
and also, one example, a woman is raped, and falls pregnant, should she be forced to have that reminder for the next nine months, on the other hand, should the baby be denied life, because it would otherwise cause the mother pretty bad discomfort.
supertrinko 2 years ago
Adoption?
silverakisame 2 years ago
yes, i'm all for putting a child up for adoption instead of abortion, however, if you know a baby will have a serious life altering defect, should the baby be given life? no matter how hard that life would be?
supertrinko 2 years ago
People with disabilities can still be happier (I would argue more happy) than many of the people who are "normal". If there is a family out there who is experienced with those kind of children and will give them love and the care that they need, I think it would be fine.
silverakisame 2 years ago
OMG!!!
"I would argue more happy"???
You're worse than I thought!
Who the F--- do you think you are to make such an uneducated, unfeeling statement as that?
When did you ever live with or raise a child with severe birth-defects? How many families are there out there available to take on that monumental task? Know any??? Is your experience limited to "Extreme Home Make-over"?
Get off my cloud!
Talk about something you actually have experience with!
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
there's no real need for such language.
perhaps you could state your opinion, so we can get a better grasp on why you disagree with silverakisame.
supertrinko 2 years ago
Sorry for the language. Just a bit frustrated following much "dialoging" with "silver" who has cast aspersions herslef.
Look throughout this "comments" blog and you will see my opinion which is based on the fact that no one had seen the ad in question and that O'Really!? did not give equal opportunity to Jehmu Greene to explain why there was opposition to the ad (in a nut-shell).
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
I had seen it. It was posted online, lol.
silverakisame 2 years ago
My pastor had a son with down's syndrome. Sure it was tough, but he was a bright child and was loved by the whole congregation. I don't see how he couldn't have been happy. Again, I said they CAN be. Not that all are, etc. Please read again. I've also worked with disabled kids tutoring them. I think many of them are able to see a world we don't grasp because we are too concerned with appearance and superficialities. There are families out there who adopt only special needs kids too.
silverakisame 2 years ago
there's some disabilities that a parent or caregiver would have to give their own lives for, 24/7 care of a child in a wheelchair with next to no motor skills, should the parent give up their social life for this child to experience a half life?
and then i return to the rape case, some mothers come to the brink of suicide when pregnant with the baby of a rapist, they dread the day the baby could come looking for it's mother, a mother who couldn't look the child in the face.
supertrinko 2 years ago
Look at the percentage of women who give an abortion due to rape they are small, if a lwas was passed to outlaw abortion only if you were raped or life in danger rape case would go through the roof, its not a good argument about 85% of abortion are due to a mother not wanting the baby due to a mistake. FACTS!
bgdomino 2 years ago
85%? really? wow, that's shameful
abortion should not be aloud just because you don't want a baby, if there is a true impact on the mother, then yes, abortion is an option but just cause the baby was an accident?
the mother doesn't have to keep the baby, sure, the baby doesn't know any better, but that doesn't mean denying it life is a good option, especially when the number of babies being denied such life is so high.
supertrinko 2 years ago
Again, it's a choice the parents have to make. Some of them don't care about a "social life" and care more about the child. It's a choice. If the woman was raped, she has to make the choice. I'm just saying adoption is AN option that should be considered. If someone else wants to get an abortion, go for it. But the emotional/mental affects are just as lasting and horrible as putting it up for adoption and worrying about seeing the baby. All choices are difficult. It's about what she wants.
silverakisame 2 years ago
about the social life, yes indeed, if they don't care about their own life, to bring up a child that cannot fend for themselves for life, then fine, help that child life what life they can.
and about putting the baby that was the product of rape up for adoption, that's pretty much what i said.
but a normal baby, that was simply not wanted, shouldn't be aloud to be aborted, the baby may not have feelings at the time, but it'd be taking away the opportunity for it to have any at all.
supertrinko 2 years ago
I'm highly entertained by all the folks claiming the ad says this, the ad says that, oh I'm so offended...when the ad hasn't run yet, no one beyond a few folks at CBS has sen it, but we're all supposed to believe you've all got magic crystal balls that can peer into the future. Ya know, you'd think that if you could see ahead to Super Bowl Sunday, you'd at least tell us who's gonna win the game, so we can make a ton of money betting on it like they did in Back To The Future II.
BillyBughead 2 years ago
It was posted online before the Super Bowl
silverakisame 2 years ago
I think Bill did a great job. The ad isn't saying that abortion is wrong, simply that abortion isn't the only answer. Pro-choice groups don't want to celebrate anything good coming from a decision to keep a baby. Pro-choice should be pro-choice, instead of being pro-abortion.
I'm pro-choice myself, though I wouldn't get an abortion myself because I couldn't handle it, I do think it's okay for people to have that choice. So let people make that choice! Abortion isn't always the answer!
silverakisame 2 years ago
@silverakisame
"Pro-choice groups don't want to celebrate anything good coming from a decision to keep a baby."
That kind of all-inclusive statement is ridiculous, untrue and you know it. Pro-choice groups like Planned Parenthood have been helping women in crisis with their choice (whether to keep or abort) for MANY years longer than Focus on the Family has been around.
Besides, the big brouhaha began because someone thought it was not an appropriate topic for a family venue - I include ED ads.
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
Then why are they offended by the ad? Why do they care about it? Planned Parenthood is useful sure, but to deny the fact that they promote abortion is to be blind. One of the main goals is to "protect" abortion rights. How this commercial offends that I don't know.
It doesn't matter who's been around longer. I don't see how it's not appropriate. It just celebrates his life. What is so damn offensive about that? It's just his story! I'm pro-choice, and I think both options should be exposed.
silverakisame 2 years ago
AGAIN - HAVE YOU SEEN THE AD? If you haven't you have no leg to stand on!
The topic of unplanned pregnancy and how those involved determine the outcome is NOT a topic most families would like to have over the buffalo wings and guacamole!
GET IT?!
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
I have seen the ad. It's tame. It barely even mentions anything. I don't see why you are so offended. You didn't see it either. It's a perfectly family oriented commercial. She just talks about her relationship with her son. Btw, if you were more informed, you would know that it wasn't an unplanned pregnancy, simply a pregnancy that she could have die by going through with it. Please get your facts straight. You sound foolish.
silverakisame 2 years ago
When did you see the ad? During the football game? (which would mean it was after your post from this discussion so don't give yourself so much credit!) I have NEVER seen the ad and NEVER claimed to have seen it. I just said that you had no business giving it credence without having seen it. Who sounds foolish?
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
@silverakisame
I see that you are 22. That explains a lot.
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
I saw it before, because it was posted ONLINE. Maybe if you bothered to check before writing it off as a huge "threat" to society and families, you wouldn't look so silly now.
And age doesn't matter. You can be old and misinformed (stupid) just as easily. :)
silverakisame 2 years ago
I am only "silly" when I want to be.
Re. age: being misinformed is not necessarily the same as being stupid (I will make an exception for: Bush & Palin supporters and O'Really?!-philes.), you simply exhibit as much understanding of political discourse as someone with a very limited background in politics and/ or world views. I'll give you a chance: What do you think of "Cap-and-trade"? Can you answer without mouthing some "talking points" fed to you via O'Really?!?
Candyliz2003 2 years ago
he ate her alive. and used poor rhetoric too.
pickles7713 2 years ago
i don't get why a pro choice group is upset about a pro life add...after all if they're pro choice and this ad is not about taking away that choice then they should be all for it...pro choice means you agree with the right to both abort and not abort...so there really should be no issue me thinks unless by pro choice you mean that anyone who is against abortion is an ignorant idiot hick...which is most likely the case
dirksilver 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are naive to think that the man and the money behind this ad (Focus on the Family) has no agenda. He will obtain public sentiment first, and then he will try and pass a law against abortion. Get real please! He wants to take away a woman's right to choose. Period. After this, he will go after gay people. You watch and don't be so fooled.
ch1aka2 2 years ago
#1. Bill is an idiot. "beef". Really Bill? That is such unprofessional language I could just about cry.
#2. He does not understand because he doesn't want to understand. Choice means to be able to abort or to not abort. It is about a woman being able to decide. Not the governement. The same argumet is made about guns. They say it is their choice to own a gun or not. Not the government.
MetalViper85 2 years ago
Good to see such an unbiased interviewer allowing his invited guest to get a word in edgewise. Why should we want to listen to her? After all we only need O'Reilly's opinion.
herbiepop 2 years ago
the commercial is implying that abortion is horrible and it is probably in the tone of "abortion is bad"
and focus on the family is a christian organization and we all know many chistians are pro-life
so it is obviously going to have pro-life tones about it
darthsasuke554 2 years ago
Comment removed
mdbys 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's not pro-choice, it is pro-abortion. Let Planned Parenthood put up a video showing the positive effects of an aborted child. Fair is fair I say!!!
tdrchainsaw 2 years ago
How do you know if the effects are positive?
glramer2007 2 years ago
For once I fully agree with Bill O'. Yes, you heard me right
Reiff444 2 years ago
Funny, most people who are pro-choice say they are not for abortion but for the woman's rights... ok with that being said, why are people upset over the ad? Sounds to me like a choice, which Mrs. Tebow made and because she chose to keep the baby it's wrong? Should they be fair and air a commercial with a woman who aborted her baby? Give me a break.
scarebear83 2 years ago
What Mother EVER tells her child I was supposed to ABORT you but I decided not to? How about a mother with an agenda and a child with out any sort of shame who want to use their twisted relationship to generate money?
No Mom in her right mind would ever tell her kid "I was supposed to abort YOU.....fucking shameless....
Mary77577 2 years ago
So you're all for a mother lying to her child instead of being truthful? How does it harm the child? The mother says "the doctors wanted me to abort you but I wanted to keep you," how is that bad? She's letting the child know she loved them enough that she would rather give the child a fighting chance. That to me sounds like ultimate love.
scarebear83 2 years ago
@scarebear83 No I'm a Mother and I would never tell me child he was in danger of being aborted when I was pregnant with him....this ad is bullshit or Mom has some mental issues....
Mary77577 2 years ago
Bill O= Willful ignorance, disingenuity, tlaking over people, and loaded questions.
magx01 2 years ago
Im not pro life, because without the mother, the baby could never be, so ultimately, its the woman's choice to have the baby or not. But, there is no reason to censor TV based on someone's opposing position. Like so many have said: Freedom of Speech
dssupra 2 years ago
No, the political ad is wrong. Period.
Why doesn't Tim Tebow do a real Christian/faith based ad on helping the poor, hungry, and homeless? The USA/Superbowl culture seems to be about Friday Night Lights, women with large fake breasts, beer and Viagra. Most of the "Christians" I observe are bigoted, self-serving and hypocrital, which is the antithesis of Jesus' teachings. Real Christians live by their actions, not Superbowl ads. Sorry, Tim Tebow, golden boy.
ch1aka2 2 years ago
I was be completely ok if they aired this if they also allowed the homosexuality ad.
JediMasterFisher 2 years ago
It's just an ad that's trying to persuade women not to have an abortion... You want an ad that tries to persuade us all to be gay?
glramer2007 2 years ago
its doing no such thing. Its promoting a website for people that are gay to find happy lives. Even if more people were gay so what? that just means less for the population and more homes for children that don't have any.
JediMasterFisher 2 years ago
Ok, I will admit, what i said below was just a joke. That being said, I don't think this ad about Tim Tebow is really an anti-choice ad. It's gives a GOOD reason not to be pro-choice, but it's doing it by telling a story, not by shoving it down your throat. That being said, the gay ad should be reserved for a channel and time that less young children will be watching.
glramer2007 2 years ago
but its okay to show beer ads with half naked girls? I'd rather my children see gay dating then that anyday!
JediMasterFisher 2 years ago
I definitely agree with you about the beer ads. On the other hand, you saying "well they did this so we should be able to do that," doesn't hold much water.
glramer2007 2 years ago
true I guess. I just hate censorship.
JediMasterFisher 2 years ago
I do to an extent. But I also think it's necessary. The parents should be the ones to educate their children on any given subject, not ads on TV. Unfortunately, so many parents just don't give a crap, and the child is educated by TV and end up acting like what they see on commercials or even in violent movies.
glramer2007 2 years ago
@smaakjeks
people who advocate "choice" tacitly support abortion by making that decision available legally, by fighting for the right to make that specific choice
bathory714 2 years ago
Also, why does Mrs. Women talk about women's health during this debate?
The debate is about ABORTION not about HEALTH.
Women usually choose abortion in order to not have children. If you don't want a child, that doesn't relate to health, just relates to decisions about time management and other things that children raising requires.
mitchblatt1dot1com 2 years ago
Mrs. Women here is kind of stupid.
She thinks that an ad arguing for women to chose life is taking away rights even though it's arguing for women to chose something, not arguing for laws banning choice.
mitchblatt1dot1com 2 years ago
FREDON OF SPEECH!!!!
wilfredo61 2 years ago
Haha, I'm entirely serious, I wish someone would debate me on this. You can get raped in the Philippines and you still have to carry the baby. Since '87, they do have exceptions if the *mother's* life is immediately threatened, which I understand that it was not in this case since according to Tebow's story, it was "recommended to avoid damage to the child." This whole thing seems like a huge distortion of the truth in order for the anti-choice movement to capitalize on Tim Tebow's fame.
sheepburn 2 years ago