Added: 8 months ago
From: 88ABRAMS88
Views: 15,913
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (81)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Watch out for Skynet

  • As long as we advance in technology till we are able to explore the galaxy i am fine with these. Just remember to look up the sky and say cheese!

  • x47b not that good any drone with out a true a.i. will fail many things vs a modern enemy. If they have remote control or human confirm fire. then a jamming can't at least stop the fire or as worse as the full control drone loses control and crashes. A full a.i. the best we can make with free will would drop and return and predictable course make it easy for fighter too pic them off.

  • That stupid music totally destroys any desired credibility you were going for.

  • one word : Taliban .

  • mostly poor people die in wars, the old rich men live, wake up to throwing your lives away for the rich, people of the Earth unite or the consequences will be beyond your worst nightmares

  • Hopefully these ones won't be easily spoofed into landing in Iran.

  • What about the F/A XX for Navy?

  • With the exception of barracuda and x37b, why do the rest look so similar ? is that dart-wing design the best option ? Also why did they move the turbine intake to the top ? Nice video though, great to see the shape of things to come.

  • Latest news: Due the ongoing economic meltdown, and to reduce costs, US and NATO officials decided to build all future weapons in CHINA ....ha ha ha...Poor pathetic countries which are never going to be back to top ..ha ha Now it is going to be Era of "BRIC" forever :))))

  • we doon 't need that crappy airplanes...Nato should be forbidden

  • NATO is there to prevent future world wars, they need money for that

  • @MrOmega467 Shush.

  • Europe is able to spend so much on its citizens BECAUSE they have the US is backing them lolz.

  • @AgrivatedKillah lol and that is a bad thing because? honestly im very glad that here in the UK we dnt hav to spend ridiculous amounts on defence, as you said the US can do it for us so our taxes can stay lower because of it, sure we forgo the title of "world superpower" but dnt u think its time to let some1 else take that burden? im sure u guys in the US will feel the same way in 200 years time

  • the Dassault neuron and the other is the best airplane for it dont risk any life

    

  • :D

  • @TheARMAProductions Ok I miscalculated. The U.S. has over 100,000 troops while 40 other nations combined are contributing about 30,000. On average thats under 1,000 troops per country. The U.K. does have the most non-U.S. troops with 9,000. I will say that the U.K. has been a very good ally to the U.S. and is probably its closest friend besides Israel. But overall, the contribution by other NATO forces is laughable.

  • @TheARMAProductions I'll give u an example. There is about 100,000 or so NATO troops in Afghanistan. Of that, only about 5,000 or so are non-U.S. soldiers. About 20 countries participate and can only cough up 5,000 troops? That is a joke. The rest of the NATO members exclusively rely on the U.S. to carry the load when it comes to military expeditions. If it weren't for the U.S., NATO wouldn't exist.

  • @TheARMAProductions #1. We are not going broke because of our defense budget. If you were to cut the entire defense budget we would still have a deficit of just under $1 trillion. Defense is only 20% of the entire budget while entitlements and welfare consist of 60%.

    #2. U are correct from an economic standpoint that the EU and US depend on each other. But I was talking mainly from a military standpoint. And NASA is a government agency not a private company.

  • @TheARMAProductions The U.S. is the only NATO member that actually increased its military budget. Every other member decreased its budget. When NATO goes to war the U.S. carries the load. Just like we carry the load when it comes to to funding the UN, IMF, World Bank etc. WIthout the U.S., the world wouldn't be what it is today.

  • somehow i should be angry that the americans stole all the tech that was decades further then anything to that time from germany but on the other hand they used it wisely so... it payed off in the long run didn't it^^

  • @NOHOW00 *tech from WW2

    

  • Whats the tune and who is the rapper?

  • cool NATO rocks!

  • x-37B is a space ship, not an aircraft, first flight 2010...Status in service ! 211 world tour without any explaination from USAF, i say "in service" !

  • By NATO u mean the United States right?

  • @bRizzle2009100 no also all other countrys, you see in this vid UAVs from france, england and germany

  • Comment removed

  • @88ABRAMS88 youtube.com/watch?v=QeWlZBnYgm­I Newly designed UAV from BAE UK.

  • @88ABRAMS88 yeah but the american ones are real they exist, the european ones are just dreams, especially when E.U. economy is going down the toilet.

  • @bRizzle2009100 no he's kidding he mean USA :p

  • It is proved that every time in every war western planes kicked asses of those crapy Russian planes. The Indians and Russians consider their Crap jet SU-30MKI equal to Dissault Rafale and F-22 Raptor. lol

  • All unmaned drones suits cowards that are scared to fight.I can see just like in Lybia by useing there drones presidents like Oduma will say its not a war because America faces no casualtys.Criminals that one day America and their friends will have to face the hole world.Plus China is going to surpass America as the world super power.Just hope they are not occupieing criminals like America.

  • To the Russian talking about shitty Russian aircrafts i say: for your stupid Pak Fa we have the F-22, which you stole the idea from us, in order to create your failure project (T-50) Pak Fa!

    Theives!

  • @DeMoNMiNdLS dude i think you dont know what you stole from the russians

  • @MegaJim555 Please feel free to tell me... with a Proof ;)... I have proof if you want ;)

  • @DeMoNMiNdLS stealth was actually a russian technology

    the concept of distracting guided misiles by jamming its laser directory was russian

    thrust vectoring

    more powerfull jet engines

    powerfull rockets(for space)

    a good assault rifle

    guided misiles

    i can go on if u want

  • @MegaJim555 no was german, google nurflügler : ) after that the german engeneers went to the united states and completed their work...

  • @MegaJim555 am the germans invented thrust vectoring during ww2 , they used it on their v2 rockets , then the british on their harriers then u coppied it put it on a jet and said u invented it , and every thing in that list is a lie or unreliable , its a fact that russian jet engines are not as good as us or european ones and i can go on and on and on stealth u all never invented it u all just came up with a theory about the angles

  • @marcusbloods1 russian jet engines need less maintanance and normally go faster and are more reliable

    and ur about right about trhust vectoring i didnt knew that

  • @MegaJim555 no they not, else they would have a plane that could go faster than the SR71 and the mig25 made to interceptor it had to have the engines changed after a short mach 3.2 flight , do some research russian jet engines are not the best

  • @MegaJim555 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA­HAHAHAHAH... and i can go on if you want... hahaha.... You fucking Russians lie about EVERYTHING! haha!

    Forgot when the F117 Crashed in Serbia? forgot when they sold it to you? With OUR Stealth technology, and this is how you actually got to know how to build stealth technology ;)... THIEVES.. just like the Chinese are!

    WITHOUT stealing our planes like gays you will be worthless!>>

  • @DeMoNMiNdLS stealth tech was invented by russians and taken by americans

  • @MegaJim555 PROVE IT?

    I JUST PROVED IT TO.. MoRoN!

    Ohh Haha Russians are great.... at leing.... haha! im waiting for your proof ;)

  • @DeMoNMiNdLS just after ww2 they builded a plane with small radar signature

  • @MegaJim555 an russian arms are just about the best at reliability but are not as accurate at us ones

  • @marcusbloods1 true but they are deadlier

  • @MegaJim555 not really

  • POWER TO NATO!!!!!!

  • This is insane, this countries are drouning in debt and still producing a lot of weaponry that will be used against us in a future not too far specially aircrafts like this that are excellent for recon missions and if armed a lot better for the fucking establishment. Wakeup!

  • @MrOmega467 This actually isn't anything compared to Highly classified weaponry.

  • @MrOmega467 Shut up,Comanchero,Mexico debts are the ones nobody can`t pay. Watch your steps not Ours,Chicano.

  • Comment removed

  • Baracuda is only a demonstrator

  • 2 people don't know how to fly an airplane... oh wai-

  • No matter how much "destructive" power you have, once your system got hacked its over.

    In my view, The future of warfare is not about the numbers or destruction, Its about disrupting the communication, hacking into missiles to change it's trajectory etc..

    Unfortunately, we have brain shortage in NATO. haha :P

  • yeah russians could never do nothing like this..

  • barrcuda

  • PAK - FA destroy this bullshit. SU-37 Mig-35 don't forget !

  • @02Sibalex Russia suck the dick.Big dick!!!

  • most looks like the German Nurflügler or Horton

  • Great Video .." NATO kicks everyone's ass " no other air power will come close to NATO.

  • @f39eagle2 I hope by NATO you mean the U.S. The united States holds the supermajority of NATO airpower and makes a lot of the planes the other countries use. Eurofighter and dassault airframes represent a minority.

  • @ConservativeAtheist9 Eurofighter,Rafael,Mirage,Grip­en,Tornado... The minority???????

  • @FrancisJoa Rafale not Rafael

  • NATO!!! will own the sky with no man in the sky

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more