@TheSHORTKID7 GAHAHAHAHAHAA NO TRAITS OF ESPLOSIVE MATERIAL AT WTC SITE, how fucking ignorant can you be to believe that? YOU BADLY want to believe that. The government got NIST to do all the "investigation", and they admitted they never looked nor tested for explosive material, why? Because their employers told them not to. Thousands, yes thousands of non government experts checked the dust and it ALL 100% samples contained unreacted nano thermite chips, you brainless monkey.
We don't need to disprove your fairy tales we are disproving the official story which is NIST. Get a clue. NIST never factored in any of the pelting from WTC1 when it did it's simulation. This is the pelting that Edgeman was saying helped weaken the structure. So, I guess Edgemann and other official story followers don't believe in defending NIST's report and simulation. Fire alone is what NIST says brought down WTC7. Think about all the reasons fire alone can't do this.
Look at how edgemanLL2 tries to get out of quote he agreed with. RBA referenced it yes. But it was you, edgemanLL2 that said, "Oh, I agree with you." Apparently when edgemanLL2 agrees with a statement such as " It collapsed after being pelted with debris from the building next to it and then burning for 7 hours", he either forgets he agrees or isn't cognizant enough of what he agreed to. Unless EddgmanLL2 reveals what he means, we'll never really know.
EdgemannLL2 says, " It collapsed after being pelted with debris from the building next to it and then burning for 7 hours" If this" pelting with debris" was so important to the destruction of WTC7, you'd think that NIST would've factored it in. They didn't. The cartoon model that NIST released and the report state that this "pelting" was insignificant. So, if you want to defend the official lie, EdgemanLL2, you'll need to tell us how fire alone could've taken out WTC7.
@charlesfloyb <--in addition to exposing himself as a Believer of NIST, and a pussy who wont hit reply because he so fears the smackdown he KNOWS he will get, Charles the Retard is also an illiterate little bitch, who has the reading comprehension of a carrott.
It was RBA to referenced "pelting." Not me. ooops!
Still wating for Charlestheretard to show us any examples of a 47 story building magically hovering for 18 seconds after all resistance was removed. =]
@EdgemanLL2 I see you're still flogging a dead horse there fuck stain. You don't get it do you?? It really doesn't matter who made what happen or why, its fucking old news the world is laughing at you. It gave you an excuse to Fail in Iraq & Fail in Afghanistan. You stupid Americunts have fucked up everything. And your puppet president is no better than the last puppet president only with a few more brain cells. No keep going Top Gun boy this is fucking hilarious. How is your boy toy Terry??
@EdgemanLL2 The only people who have won, top gun boy, are the 3000 odd people who died that day, They haven't had to read your stupid fucking comments for the last 10 years.
You are like a 12 year old. Not interested in anything but yourself and Cant handle being a fool always resorting to cheap insults thinking your better than the wise people of the earth.
You didn't answer my question fuck stain. How is your arse mate Terry???
@EdgemanLL2 Im sorry I didn't ask for your permission to post on you tube CUNT STAIN. I should have known that replying to a fuckwit with a god complex would get me into trouble. The thing is CUNT STAIN I couldn't give a fuck what you say, do or think. My issue is that for ten years, all day every day, on countless vids, you have been fighting a fight that nobody gives a fuck about anymore. Now you are either paid to post on youtube or you have no life (my vote the latter)
Pretty funny though. you troll comments I made 10 months ago. Then pretend others have no life? You wait 24/7 for me to post, so you can come running back instantly. Then complain others have no life?
@EdgemanLL2 Oh so you have a life CUNT STAIN. Then you must be paid to post. Is your remuneration based on a per word or per comment basis??? I have no need to pretend you have no life CUNT STAIN, your paid Youtube contributions are evidence of that fact. Thing is CUNT STAIN no matter how hard you try you will always be a fuckwit.
Now how is your arse mate Terry doing??? He must be rolling in the big bucks too!!!
If someone can find one example of a building falling at free fall acceleration other than explosives, I'd love to see it. Right now, it appears that WTC7 had to have explosives in order to hit the 2.2 seconds of free fall acceleration. Only explosives can remove this resistence, that's why this free fall acceleration reported by NIST is evidence of explosives. It can't happen any other way.
@charlesfloyb If anyone can find an example of a 47 story building taking 18 seconds to collapse, AFTER it had its resistance removed by explosives, Id love to see it.
@EdgemanLL2 Sure thats easy the collapse of World trade center 7 on 9/11. It collapsed after being pelted with debris from the building next to it and then burning for 7 hours
@RBAWilcox Oh, I agree with you. I was just trying to help out old CharleRetard.
Still cant find me any examples where 47 story buildings defy the laws of physics and free fall and 1/3 the free fall rate after having all its resistant removed with magical, silent explosives, =]
@EdgemanLL2 Oh, that's the route you're taking. I suggest you read the highest trump for the official story at this point. It's called NIST. NIST clearly states in its final report that WTC7 fell at freefall acceleration. The only stab you feel is the point of your own knive cutting into you. If you choose to put your head in the sand, that's your choice. However, you'll never win an argument.
@baitedfloyb I suggest you take youre own advice them and read your own sainted trump card NIST. because they do NOT say the building fell at free fall accelration. What they DID say was that there was a 2.25 second moment of free fall accelleration measured at one segment from one wall. This is NOT say the same thing as saying the building itself collapsed at free fall. It still took approx 18 seconds total to complete.
In the same way that I can roll a ball down a flight of stairs...
Cont) the ball will have many moments where it is in free fall. This doesnt somehow proof the staircase was blown up with explosives.
The stab you feel is not only the point of the knife, but the bitter, metallic taste in your upper lip? Thats me sinking the hook. You were baited son! Too bad you get your info from kook sites, instead of the primary sources themselves. If you choose to continue using kooksites and bury your head in the sand, thats ur choice. But youll never win an argument
@EdgemanLL2 Your example doesn't work. A bowling ball rolling down a flight of stairs will never reach free fall acceleration. Every time the bowling ball hits another stair, the stair will offer some resistance, thus blocking any possibility of the bowling ball reaching free fall speed. In a natural collapse WTC7 would always be facing some resistance, thus stopping it from achieving free fall acceleration. But WTC7 , stated in the final NIST report did free fall for a 2.25 second period.
@charlesfloyb The example works perfectly. Both to make my point, and to expose you (as if more proof were needed after all these years) as a moron with no clue about physics.
Any time it is in the air, from one step, to the next, its in free fall. Its vertical acceleration is always a free-fall rate.
So again, just as its not proof the staircase was blown up, a brief (and obviously predictable) 2 second moment out of an 18 second collase is also not proof of explosives. Homeschooler
@EdgemanLL2 "Any time it is in the air, from one step, to the next, its in free fall. Its vertical acceleration is always a free-fall rate." The problem is, that the bowling ball is a separate object and not connected to the stairwell. So, technically, your bowling ball which is a completely foolish analogy because it's not part of the building, does fall for a portion of a second in free fall. But then it slows once it hits the next stair. WTC7 never slowed for 2.2 seconds of free fall.
@charlesfloyb The problem is, in the matter of physics, thats a difference without a distinction. A periodic moment of free fall in NO WAY constitutites explosives. PERIOD.
It wouldnt have collapsed over a period of 18 seconds, if it was a CD. PERIOD.
Moronic fantasies about a brief, glimmer of a moment is irrelevant.
@EdgemanLL2 , you said"What they DID say was that there was a 2.25 second moment of free fall accelleration measured at one segment from one wall. " Yes, and this measurement represents the whole building falling at free fall. If not, show just one part that didn't fall at that speed. That's all you'd have to do to disprove it.
You'd have to be a complete retard to believe the Government...
Do the tiniest bit of research and you will see what a complete farce 9/11 was... I couldn't possibly think of a better way to destroy America from the Inside.
@EdgemanLL2 Calling me InedibleKOOK...wow...never looked at it like that before. Thanks for setting me straight! I'll be sure to choose authority over instincts and reason from here on out. As your president so wisely proclaimed seven years ago, Mission Accomplished!
@EdgemanLL2 You talking about refuting fact hahahahahah. FUCK STAIN thats a big word for you. All you have is the same dull arguement that sounds like it is directly from a script. When your proven wrong as you have been time and time again you clam up and call people names. You never refute anybody's argument when they catch you out.
9 years and your still going on about it. GET OVER IT FUCK STAIN.
@EdgemanLL2 Sound isn't required for it to be an explosive demolition. Did you know that? Didn't think so. Sure we have one shown here where the recording device recorded the sound. Are you trying to say I can't find a demolition where the recording device didn't record the sound very well, like in WTC7?
@charlesfloyb Actually (despite some times non-exposive events are considered explosions) yeah, there really does need to be some type of sound to it. Because by definition the explosive charge releases energy rapidly ( compared to an indendiary, for example, which is slower), The rapid release of energy compresses air ahead of the energy wave as the wave propagates outward. The compressed air is what you hear as the explosion.
Why did they waste all those small explosives and time rigging them when they could have used one medium bomb at the top floor and let the "pancake effect" do what it allegedly does? Oh right...science doesn't allow it.
@TrutherD1 They can't just use any old fire. It has to be that special blend that is hot enough to cut (not melt) steel and weaken concrete hundreds of feet down, but not too hot that it burns passports inside it.
@RetarD1. Funny how morons like you keep saying that, ignoring the fact that the buildings that collapsed from fire, Damaged or destroyed dozens of other, nearby buildings.
Its neither efficient, nor "controlled" to demolish a building that way, since every time its been tried, dozens of nearby buildings were also destroyed or damaged.
@EdgemanLL2 Whatever you say. You're the anonymous expert who knows better than 1200 architects and engineers who raised over $50,000 at buildingwhat. org
@RetarD1 1200 STUDENTS and a handful of architects and engineers. None of whome have any demolition, or collapse forensics experience, or have designed anything taller than a Gymnasium.
Compared to countless peer reviewed papers, and 100's of millions of architects, engineers worldwide who laugh at you shitheads?
@RetarD1 LOLOL> if you thought for yourself, youd never EVER be so sheeplike as to say "Hey, I saw it on a website, its gotta be true!" If you REALLY thought for yourself youd steer clear of the agenda websites, and rely on the peer-reviewed data. If you REALLY thought for yourself youd never think "I heard it on talk radio, no need to think for myself anymore! Talk radio is infallable!"
Its true we dont have to agree. But youre still the kook that everyone laughs at, and no one believes. =]
So it doesnt matter to me, for shit, if we agree or not. Because even if you argue "to a tie" you still lose. Because after we both turn off the computer and go out into the world, youre still a kook, with Zero evidence to back up your bullshit. =]
@charlesfloyb So, you were so HUMILIATED that you got caught lying (evidence does exist for the terrorist attack, while you have NOTHING) that you couldnt even sum up the courage to hit "reply." Because you KNEW id come back and laugh at you.
Your challenge was met. In return, you had ZERO to support your kookery. Edge wins!
"...investigators have “traced the origin of the funding of 9/11 back to financial accounts in Pakistan.’’
The Times of India first reported on October 10, 2001 that India told the US that some $100,000 had been wired to the leader of the hijackers, Mahmud Atta, by British-born terrorist Ahmad Saeed Umar Sheikh."
• It is interesting how we are constantly looking for associations in archetypes.. (subconsciously and consciously) If we cannot go to that parallel; point of reference.. we come up with whatever is close to that point.
Edgeman is your typical Shill. He misrepresents arguments, behaves superciliously, has an inexplicable penchant for derision, and is impervious to logic. How he's managed to accumulate so many friends on YouTube when he's such a colossal ass is mind-boggling.
@CHIPSTERO7 LOL. Typical shill. meaning I debunked you losers. So you have to make some OTHER bullshit fantasy (ie, that people are actually paid to refute you) to cover for the humiliating ass beating I gave you.
i watched the twins come down. my first thought? "that sure did look like controlled demolition" (seen lots of them). that was followed by lots of second thoughts like "how could that ever be pulled off?" but regardless of how impossible something seems the fact remains that they fell like controlled demo. considering what is required to make any building fall through what would normally be the path of greatest resistance....well...
@Mrreverendjim@Mrreverendjim Ive tyouve REALLY seen lots of them, youd know that demolitions blow out the lowest floors, and the buildings "telescopes" down. They dont blow up the building, floor by floor, from the top down, one floor at a time. Plus, the sounds of the explosives are unmistakable for MILES.
@Mrreverendjim its not an insult, its a FACT. youre either lying about seeing many demolitions before, OR youre lying about what you saw. Because irrefutably, they dont look alike.
Unlike yourself, Im VERY openminded. Just show me the invisible, govt demolition ninjas running into the buildings, using magical, invisible, silent explosives to take down the buildings.
Cont--As far as the AE911Kooks, just let me know when they start passing peer-review.
Its grossly hypocritical for you kooks to whine about people being open minded. YOU shitheads have already decided no matter WHAT you see, youll never accept the truth.
Me, on the other hand, am 100% open minded. Just show me the actual, direct evidence where I can see govt agents participating in the attacks.
@EdgemanLL2 oh yes...good old peer review. seems they use this to control what gets out and to ridicule dissent at the same time. i just have questions, i dont really see anyone 100% able to convince me of anything either way concerning the how or why concerning this event. on the other hand you seem to have your mind made up. care to define open minded? and your incessant name calling and insults...well...that kind of behaviour speaks for itself.
Thats just a pussified, little twat cop-out to avoid facing the fact that REAL scientific community that actually KNOWS what the fux they are talking about laughs at you shitheads. No one who ACTUALLY knows wtf they are talking about takes you idiots seriously--because its pure BS. Rather than face the fact, you idiots come up with some worldwide, bullshit conspiracy to keep you idiots from getting credibly published. Pathetic. truly truly! =]
@Mrreverendjim And, again, as you kooks do, you see the world in reverse STILL. YOU hve already made up your mind--no matter what you see, youll still push the inside job lie despite any facts or evidence.
I stated it plainly, and unmistakeably. Just go ahead and show me the credible, corroborated proof where I see govt agents wiring the buildings to explode. Ill believe it.
But you cant. why not? because its a fuxed in the head moronic lie with no basis in reality.
@EdgemanLL2 just cant stop with the gutter mouth can you? do you know what debate is? didn't think so..you'ld rather insult and rant and so on. you know something? the difference between me and you is 911 is not my life. i looked at your channel. you need to get a life. jeez...its history man. come to think of it, maybe thats why i like yanking the chains of morons who are stupid enough to bite and expend so much energy on the ensueing bullshit. lol...fool.
MrLaden. Of course this is your life. All kooks are pathetic, lifeless dolts looking for meaning.
And yes, moron, I know what a debate is. And if YOU knew what one was, youd know that the primary requirements are Candor, Intelligence and a good faith attempt at the discussion. you EPIC fail all three.
Cont---You refuse to be honest, you are a moron, and are REFUSING to have the debate--instead you keep focusing on me.
So stop whining like a little bitch about me. have the debate about the REAL issue. Be honest. Show me the govt agents participating in the attacks, or be HONEST and admit it really didnt happen.
Bluff called, bitch. Thats the debate. Paritipate--show me the govt participation--or admir youre wrong.
@EdgemanLL2 more gutter mouth. i was going to ignore you but i'm betting you will have to rant some more. you can always get a life, ya know. btw, how was i focusing on you? i made a comment and you went on a crusade. i am much more interested in the psycology of your obsession.
@CHIPSTERO7 yeah...but he's fun to tease. and i really am interested in the psycology of willful ignorance. i mean with the political, government and scientific communities i can understand the pressure. but joe public? you gotta wonder.
Translation: "Edge was too smart for Chip. Edge will debunk all your lies and make you face the fact--like he did with Chip--that youre a mindless moron duped into believing kookspiracies. So dont listen to him, or else youll see how wrong we were!" HAHAHAHA
@EdgemanLL2 you back again? lol... you have found me out...i am hiding in a cave in afganistan, or is it iraq? well where ever the mainstream media says i am. i'm sure you'll believe it. man...you are obsessed....wow...did you know my alqaeda funded computer is a weapon of mass destruction? george was looking for it but he never found it. just thought you should know that george wouldn't lie about such things....
@EdgemanLL2 why do i keep finding you when i check my messages? i believe you are obsessed. you refer to me as achmed...hmm...you know when i look at the world just taking things at face value...u know...the US administration fighting isreals wars and stuff...vids like the latest from wikileaks...all that fun historical stuff...i can see why there are arab terrorists, same reason as why there was an IRA. how do you feel about zionism and isreali terror against palistine.
@EdgemanLL2 2 weeks and you cant leave it alone. whats wrong? no one biting? i haven't thought about this vid for weeks, but your still at it. that's obsession. have you thought about making a fragrance out of it? no, somebody beat you to it. you are behind the 8 ball, "edge"....again.
@EdgemanLL2 agents? how about the entire bush admin, or at least the top members, if not all of them. the bush family is in oil. they hobnob with oil company execs, big bankers, weapons manufacture execs etc...and you don't think they're just waiting for a reason (ie. 911) to start a war? can you not see their motives? let me tell you buddy, they're counting on guys like you to be fooled and get behind their game. are you gonna fight for the people, or do what they tell you to?
@randekio Its one thing if you want to say they took advantage of a real, no shit terrorist attack for political gain. THAT is an issue where reasonable people can disagree.
However, thats a completely different issue from the moronic inside job claims. You are simply, chronically naive, and employ logical fallacies (false dichotemy). Try harder,
@EdgemanLL2 we have a body of evidence and an official explanation that leave many questions, we have financial motive, we know the government has lied to us in the past...put it all together and i just can't buy what i've been told. i don't know what happened, but they've obviously done a poor job of convincing me (and thousands of others) that it all happened the way they said it did. why don't we have a second (proper) investigation, then people like me can stop bothering people like you.
@randekio You dont have evidence. you have rumor, innuendo, speculation and conjecture. You can say "leave many questions." Thats really irrelevant. As such, simply because you dont understand what happened isnt evidence that it didnt happen.
its completely irrelevant if you "buy it" or not. your inability to comprehend is completely irrelevant to reality. The fact that you dont buy reality doesnt make it any less a reality.
@EdgemanLL2 so are you telling me sir, that if a friend or colleague lied to you repeatedly you wouldn't lose trust in them? even if you have no proof? and they had motive? it gets to the point where you need concrete proof just to believe them. that is what trust is about sir. and if you believe the government blindly, then i say good luck to you sir. i'm not sure i believe the conspiracies, but you're the one that needs to come to grips with reality.
@randekio of COURSE you believe in the Kookspiracies. its the only way you could peddle that "wouldnt you lose trust in someone who lies to you" with a straight face.
Because without any doubt, the kook movement lies repeatedly and unabashedly. If you REALLY believed the shit you just wrote, you could NEVER doubt for a SECOND that the kookspiracies are false.
Cont--Further, your lack of any training in logic or analytcal thinking shines brightly. Just because govt lies to its people does NOT somehow make it impossible for that country to be attacked by terrorists. Its a false dichotemy. Logical fallacies so prevelant in the kook movement.
cont-3: 2) an overly complex kookspiracy that couldnt happen in a million years because its so ridculously overlycomplex--requiring 10s of thousands to participate, Ignore all the observationsand just assume (without an cause) that its all fake? It requires us to assume thousands of baseless, idiotic claims?it requires us to pretend the whole world lies, except kooks?
When comparing those 2? Only an idiot gives #2 the light of day
@EdgemanLL2 look sir, you can't tell me what i believe and what i don't believe. you are not me. why do you think there are thousands (if not millions, and growing) of people that are asking questions about 911? because they've lost trust in their government, sir. even if it happened the way you say it did, there's a bunch of people who don't believe it. and rightly so. we have been lied to too many times to believe everything they say. this whole thing is about trust.
1) I am not telling you what you think. In fact, no one could ever, honestly describe what kooks do as thinking. Its a completely thoughtless, faith-based belief. In any event, it is YOU who is telling ME what you (which can only euphemistically be referred to as) "think."
2) Millions and growing. LMAO. Lets see, shall we? Loose Brains final cut, world premiere CANCELLED because no one showed. IN NY, where the metro area is over 10 million!!!
2) cont--also in NY, on the 911 anniversary, Bermass could only get 3 people to "rally" with him (again, out of a metro area of over 10 million). the dick Gage, Fetzer et all give speeches to small handfuls of people at a time. Ray Griffin shills his book in Seattle (metro area 3.3 million) 30 people show up. Kooks sites get fewer and fewer hits each month, and have to go begging for donations--and ever some have branched out into bigfoot, UFO's and shit just to try and break even.
cont--Kook Candidate, Ron Paul, Went down like a $4 hooker. "Getting kicked in the nuts" got more votes than RP got. Yeah. HUGE movement. HAHAHAHAHA. Sorry Achmed, the kook movement is collapsing at free fall speed. You have a better chance of finding a flat-Earther than finding a 911 kook.
3) "its about trust!" LMAO. Bull-fuxing-shit! If it were about trust, youd never believe the kookspiracies. they are PROVED liars. Sorry, but kooks who hurl ridiculous slanders have NO credibility complaining about the lost trust. Youll never GET the trust back, if you insist on dishonesty and slander. Capice?
@EdgemanLL2 woah, i just realized (after i read a few comments on the actual tube) that you rant on, through multiple comments. I'm only getting the ones that read @randekio. i think you're obsessive, or possibly insane. i don't think i should correspond with you anymore. good luck, my friend.
@randekio "i don't think i should correspond with you"
Translation: "Edge is right. Rand cant defend his indefenisble treason against humanity. Terrified by any facts or logic that expose the idiocy of Rands kookspiratard religious beliefs, Rands instinct is to run away and hide. So rather than accept that he was wrong, he's going to run off and bury the empty head in the sand."
@EdgemanLL2 i hope i can say this without hurting your feelings, or insulting you. please realize sir, it's not normal to be ranting on through dozens of comments like this. And after reading some of their content, i think you may have a mental illness. if left unchecked, it can get worse over time. if you don't have professional help already, i hope you'll at least go for an evaluation. good luck, and take care my friend. peace and love. R
@EdgemanLL2 you're not telling me what i think? your exact words were-- "of COURSE you believe in the Kookspiracies. its the only way you could peddle that "wouldnt you lose trust in someone who lies to you" with a straight face."--Huh? can you see me? i'm starting to doubt your sanity.
look sir, i live in canada, and i see more and more people talking about 911, in mainstream media. for example, just last month CBC did an hour long expose on 911 with experts on both sides of the issue.
@EdgemanLL2 "completely thoughtless, faith-based belief" Yes, the official conspiracy theory is this. When you can actually come up with some evidence that 19 hijackers led by Bin Laden did 9/11, then we can change what you just said in the quotes.
@charlesfloyb <--the PeeWee Herman Defense "I know you are but what am I?"
You forgot the "neener neener neener" at the end.
No evidence, huh? Besides them admitting it repeatedly? Besides the hijacking being on the plane, and identified by the flight attendants, by seat number? Besides al Jazeera airing video "last wills" where they brag about the attacks, before it happened, with OBL sitting next to them?
Yeah, if you ignore all the evidence, there is none! LMAO
@EdgemanLL2 " Besides them admitting it repeatedly? " Very vague, who is "them".
"identified by the flight attendants, by seat number?" Yet you can't name the flight number or the flight attendants by name. Not very sound evidence. Alot of things wrong with the tape you mention. 1st, it's authenticity can't be verified, and there are many more problems with it. So where is your evidence of your outlandish and crazy story? Do you have ANYTHING AT ALL?
Really smart companies use Straight Diesel Fuel because on 911?WTC 10,000 gal of diesel fuel concentrated on 10 stories Pulverized all the 110 stories of steel reinforced concrete floors. Even the CORE had Steel reinforced concrete for at least 10 stories and it, too, is Gone. Smart Demo Co' are using Diesel in trying economic times. Makes Cents.
@pcuimac That will end the noise pollution caused by blowing things up. Just set it on fire with some diesel fuel and then toss office furniture on it and you have a controlled demolition for 110 acres per WTC..
@IExposeMormonism LOL. yeah, youd have a controlled demolition that destroys or damages a dozen nearby buildings.
Yep! yeah! do that. Do demolitions THAT way. Then go out of business after the first one because 1) you have to repair or replace dozens of nearby buildings and 2) youll never get insurance again.
@Moron. But you werent talking about LS. You were asking when demo companies dont use fires to bring down buildings. I explained why,
As far as LS goes (idiot) since he BORROWED money to finance the leases, his insurance payment would be required to go to either 1) paying off the loans OR rebuilding the buildings to provide collateral for the loan. Hence Larry dont see a DIME! Ooops!
ROFL that's the fucking ugliest building in the world :D everybody were so happy when it blowed up ..or down but why americans always explode everything? O_o can't they just break it little more carefully
Great Video - have a look at my site
MotherwellScotland 3 months ago
press 2 to see a man rape another man
PSPFREAK201 5 months ago
@TheSHORTKID7 GAHAHAHAHAHAA NO TRAITS OF ESPLOSIVE MATERIAL AT WTC SITE, how fucking ignorant can you be to believe that? YOU BADLY want to believe that. The government got NIST to do all the "investigation", and they admitted they never looked nor tested for explosive material, why? Because their employers told them not to. Thousands, yes thousands of non government experts checked the dust and it ALL 100% samples contained unreacted nano thermite chips, you brainless monkey.
Xendrius 7 months ago
is there nothing I can't masterbaute to?
Djalkoe 8 months ago 2
google scholar search active thermitic materials
wow, that's right
scientists have found high-tech explosive in the dust from the wtc buildings
152czar 9 months ago
We don't need to disprove your fairy tales we are disproving the official story which is NIST. Get a clue. NIST never factored in any of the pelting from WTC1 when it did it's simulation. This is the pelting that Edgeman was saying helped weaken the structure. So, I guess Edgemann and other official story followers don't believe in defending NIST's report and simulation. Fire alone is what NIST says brought down WTC7. Think about all the reasons fire alone can't do this.
charlesfloyb 11 months ago
@charlesfloyb Sooo, Charles ADMITS he has no proof to the contrary.
Another Succesfful debunking.
Edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at how edgemanLL2 tries to get out of quote he agreed with. RBA referenced it yes. But it was you, edgemanLL2 that said, "Oh, I agree with you." Apparently when edgemanLL2 agrees with a statement such as " It collapsed after being pelted with debris from the building next to it and then burning for 7 hours", he either forgets he agrees or isn't cognizant enough of what he agreed to. Unless EddgmanLL2 reveals what he means, we'll never really know.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
EdgemannLL2 says, " It collapsed after being pelted with debris from the building next to it and then burning for 7 hours" If this" pelting with debris" was so important to the destruction of WTC7, you'd think that NIST would've factored it in. They didn't. The cartoon model that NIST released and the report state that this "pelting" was insignificant. So, if you want to defend the official lie, EdgemanLL2, you'll need to tell us how fire alone could've taken out WTC7.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlestheretard <--Pussy who wont hit reply, because he knows I PWN his bitch-ass every time he does.
Charles says "Edge is wrong, because NIST is right and says something different."
Charles debunks himself. His comment relies on the premise that the NIST report must be correct.
Charles <---concludes NIST report correct, and there was no inside job.
Edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb <--in addition to exposing himself as a Believer of NIST, and a pussy who wont hit reply because he so fears the smackdown he KNOWS he will get, Charles the Retard is also an illiterate little bitch, who has the reading comprehension of a carrott.
It was RBA to referenced "pelting." Not me. ooops!
Still wating for Charlestheretard to show us any examples of a 47 story building magically hovering for 18 seconds after all resistance was removed. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
STILL waiting Charles. Where is it?
EdgemanLL2 11 months ago
@EdgemanLL2 I see you're still flogging a dead horse there fuck stain. You don't get it do you?? It really doesn't matter who made what happen or why, its fucking old news the world is laughing at you. It gave you an excuse to Fail in Iraq & Fail in Afghanistan. You stupid Americunts have fucked up everything. And your puppet president is no better than the last puppet president only with a few more brain cells. No keep going Top Gun boy this is fucking hilarious. How is your boy toy Terry??
3133123 3 weeks ago
@3133123 "It really doesn't matter who made what happen"
See? Kooks admit it. Outside job.
Edge wins.
EdgemanLL2 3 weeks ago
@EdgemanLL2 The only people who have won, top gun boy, are the 3000 odd people who died that day, They haven't had to read your stupid fucking comments for the last 10 years.
You are like a 12 year old. Not interested in anything but yourself and Cant handle being a fool always resorting to cheap insults thinking your better than the wise people of the earth.
You didn't answer my question fuck stain. How is your arse mate Terry???
3133123 3 weeks ago
@3133123 Damn bitch, you run right back as soon as I post? Someone is desperate for some Edge Cock.
Dont worry. Crying Kook is my favorite sound.
EdgemanLL2 3 weeks ago
@EdgemanLL2 Im sorry I didn't ask for your permission to post on you tube CUNT STAIN. I should have known that replying to a fuckwit with a god complex would get me into trouble. The thing is CUNT STAIN I couldn't give a fuck what you say, do or think. My issue is that for ten years, all day every day, on countless vids, you have been fighting a fight that nobody gives a fuck about anymore. Now you are either paid to post on youtube or you have no life (my vote the latter)
3133123 2 weeks ago
@3133123 Im sorry that I hurt your vagina.
Pretty funny though. you troll comments I made 10 months ago. Then pretend others have no life? You wait 24/7 for me to post, so you can come running back instantly. Then complain others have no life?
LMGDAOOOOO. PWND!
EdgemanLL2 1 week ago
@EdgemanLL2 Oh so you have a life CUNT STAIN. Then you must be paid to post. Is your remuneration based on a per word or per comment basis??? I have no need to pretend you have no life CUNT STAIN, your paid Youtube contributions are evidence of that fact. Thing is CUNT STAIN no matter how hard you try you will always be a fuckwit.
Now how is your arse mate Terry doing??? He must be rolling in the big bucks too!!!
3133123 1 week ago
@3133123 <--More crying.
Edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 5 days ago
If someone can find one example of a building falling at free fall acceleration other than explosives, I'd love to see it. Right now, it appears that WTC7 had to have explosives in order to hit the 2.2 seconds of free fall acceleration. Only explosives can remove this resistence, that's why this free fall acceleration reported by NIST is evidence of explosives. It can't happen any other way.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb If anyone can find an example of a 47 story building taking 18 seconds to collapse, AFTER it had its resistance removed by explosives, Id love to see it.
right now.
=]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Sure thats easy the collapse of World trade center 7 on 9/11. It collapsed after being pelted with debris from the building next to it and then burning for 7 hours
RBAWilcox 1 year ago
@RBAWilcox Oh, I agree with you. I was just trying to help out old CharleRetard.
Still cant find me any examples where 47 story buildings defy the laws of physics and free fall and 1/3 the free fall rate after having all its resistant removed with magical, silent explosives, =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
WTC7 fell at free fall acceleration. How does that happen without explosives? Anybody want to take a stab at that one?
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb Simple. It didnt fall at free fall.
Stab completed. :)
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Oh, that's the route you're taking. I suggest you read the highest trump for the official story at this point. It's called NIST. NIST clearly states in its final report that WTC7 fell at freefall acceleration. The only stab you feel is the point of your own knive cutting into you. If you choose to put your head in the sand, that's your choice. However, you'll never win an argument.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@baitedfloyb I suggest you take youre own advice them and read your own sainted trump card NIST. because they do NOT say the building fell at free fall accelration. What they DID say was that there was a 2.25 second moment of free fall accelleration measured at one segment from one wall. This is NOT say the same thing as saying the building itself collapsed at free fall. It still took approx 18 seconds total to complete.
In the same way that I can roll a ball down a flight of stairs...
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Cont) the ball will have many moments where it is in free fall. This doesnt somehow proof the staircase was blown up with explosives.
The stab you feel is not only the point of the knife, but the bitter, metallic taste in your upper lip? Thats me sinking the hook. You were baited son! Too bad you get your info from kook sites, instead of the primary sources themselves. If you choose to continue using kooksites and bury your head in the sand, thats ur choice. But youll never win an argument
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Your example doesn't work. A bowling ball rolling down a flight of stairs will never reach free fall acceleration. Every time the bowling ball hits another stair, the stair will offer some resistance, thus blocking any possibility of the bowling ball reaching free fall speed. In a natural collapse WTC7 would always be facing some resistance, thus stopping it from achieving free fall acceleration. But WTC7 , stated in the final NIST report did free fall for a 2.25 second period.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb The example works perfectly. Both to make my point, and to expose you (as if more proof were needed after all these years) as a moron with no clue about physics.
Any time it is in the air, from one step, to the next, its in free fall. Its vertical acceleration is always a free-fall rate.
So again, just as its not proof the staircase was blown up, a brief (and obviously predictable) 2 second moment out of an 18 second collase is also not proof of explosives. Homeschooler
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 "Any time it is in the air, from one step, to the next, its in free fall. Its vertical acceleration is always a free-fall rate." The problem is, that the bowling ball is a separate object and not connected to the stairwell. So, technically, your bowling ball which is a completely foolish analogy because it's not part of the building, does fall for a portion of a second in free fall. But then it slows once it hits the next stair. WTC7 never slowed for 2.2 seconds of free fall.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb The problem is, in the matter of physics, thats a difference without a distinction. A periodic moment of free fall in NO WAY constitutites explosives. PERIOD.
It wouldnt have collapsed over a period of 18 seconds, if it was a CD. PERIOD.
Moronic fantasies about a brief, glimmer of a moment is irrelevant.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EdgemanLL2 , you said"What they DID say was that there was a 2.25 second moment of free fall accelleration measured at one segment from one wall. " Yes, and this measurement represents the whole building falling at free fall. If not, show just one part that didn't fall at that speed. That's all you'd have to do to disprove it.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
What a pussy kicking that guy when
He was down, fucking pussy bitch
Headshothorror4488 1 year ago
haha wtf was that countdown? xD i loled, lol
necrOothic 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my latest video on 9/11 truth.
TrutherD1 1 year ago
You'd have to be a complete retard to believe the Government...
Do the tiniest bit of research and you will see what a complete farce 9/11 was... I couldn't possibly think of a better way to destroy America from the Inside.
NanoThermite911 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Calling me InedibleKOOK...wow...never looked at it like that before. Thanks for setting me straight! I'll be sure to choose authority over instincts and reason from here on out. As your president so wisely proclaimed seven years ago, Mission Accomplished!
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@Inediblekook. Translation: you couldnt refute the facts. So you whined about me instead.
Kook <--denial accomplished! LMGDAO!!!!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 You talking about refuting fact hahahahahah. FUCK STAIN thats a big word for you. All you have is the same dull arguement that sounds like it is directly from a script. When your proven wrong as you have been time and time again you clam up and call people names. You never refute anybody's argument when they catch you out.
9 years and your still going on about it. GET OVER IT FUCK STAIN.
3133123 1 year ago
@Achmed. More ad homs. More whining. Edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2
more unintelligent 3rd person crap Just what I expect from you FUCK STAIN
3133123 1 year ago
@Monkeyboy. More dancing. just what I ordered you to do. Edge wins
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2
3rd person again really FUCK STAIN change it up will ya Im getting bored
3133123 1 year ago
@Monkeyboy. LOLOL. Im not bored. I love making you dance.
Dance! Edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Hahahahahahahaha
Your head is going to explode
3133123 1 year ago
How come there's no related videos telling people to investigate 9/11?
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1 Same reason there are no videos demanding a new investigation to see if the Earth is flat or not.
Anyone with a shred of education knows the Earth isnt flat, and the Truth movement is a bunch of fuxing retards. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 No harm in a little investigation :)
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@TrutherD1 Great. Then lets investigate you, and the rest of the kook movement for ties to Alqaeda.
No harm, eh?
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Knock yourself out. Just don't infringe on my rights.
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1. Ok, send me all your financial records.
For the last 10 years. =]
Bluff called.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 If you want to investigate me you're going to have to do it yourself.
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1 Ok, so you lied before. You dont think there is no harm in an investigation. Thats why you opposed my request.
Busted!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 You still trolling?
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1. Yes you are.
Thanks for asking. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 lol... so you like exploding buildings a lot, eh? WTC 7 is a good one.
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1 Just show me the video of 7 that looks and sounds like this video, and Ill believe ya!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 There you go again imagining I'm saying things I'm not. lol. do you spend all day, week, year here fighting 9/11 truth or what?
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1 Nothing imagined at all. YOU said, clearly and umanbiguously, that B7 was a "good one" in reference to exploding buildings.
I simply asked you to show me how it exploded. Show me the video (like the one here) where we can see and hear it?
Oh, wait. NOW I remember. Because you lied. It wasnt exploded. NOW I remember. Its all coming back to me now. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EdgemanLL2 You mean WTC building 7? Yeah they're raising funds for it at buildingwhat. org Few people even know it was destroyed on 9/11
TrutherD1 1 year ago 3
@EdgemanLL2 Sound isn't required for it to be an explosive demolition. Did you know that? Didn't think so. Sure we have one shown here where the recording device recorded the sound. Are you trying to say I can't find a demolition where the recording device didn't record the sound very well, like in WTC7?
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb Actually (despite some times non-exposive events are considered explosions) yeah, there really does need to be some type of sound to it. Because by definition the explosive charge releases energy rapidly ( compared to an indendiary, for example, which is slower), The rapid release of energy compresses air ahead of the energy wave as the wave propagates outward. The compressed air is what you hear as the explosion.
Class dismissed.
PS, ur a datelss bitch, STILL? lol.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Why did they waste all those small explosives and time rigging them when they could have used one medium bomb at the top floor and let the "pancake effect" do what it allegedly does? Oh right...science doesn't allow it.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@Inediblehulk Funny how they don't use fire for CD when it's so efficient. ;)
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@TrutherD1 They can't just use any old fire. It has to be that special blend that is hot enough to cut (not melt) steel and weaken concrete hundreds of feet down, but not too hot that it burns passports inside it.
Inediblehulk 1 year ago
@RetarD1. Funny how morons like you keep saying that, ignoring the fact that the buildings that collapsed from fire, Damaged or destroyed dozens of other, nearby buildings.
Its neither efficient, nor "controlled" to demolish a building that way, since every time its been tried, dozens of nearby buildings were also destroyed or damaged.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Whatever you say. You're the anonymous expert who knows better than 1200 architects and engineers who raised over $50,000 at buildingwhat. org
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1 1200 STUDENTS and a handful of architects and engineers. None of whome have any demolition, or collapse forensics experience, or have designed anything taller than a Gymnasium.
Compared to countless peer reviewed papers, and 100's of millions of architects, engineers worldwide who laugh at you shitheads?
Ill take whats behind door #2 Monty!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Why would I believe you? I think for myself. We don't have to agree.
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1 LOLOL> if you thought for yourself, youd never EVER be so sheeplike as to say "Hey, I saw it on a website, its gotta be true!" If you REALLY thought for yourself youd steer clear of the agenda websites, and rely on the peer-reviewed data. If you REALLY thought for yourself youd never think "I heard it on talk radio, no need to think for myself anymore! Talk radio is infallable!"
Its true we dont have to agree. But youre still the kook that everyone laughs at, and no one believes. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Cont.
So it doesnt matter to me, for shit, if we agree or not. Because even if you argue "to a tie" you still lose. Because after we both turn off the computer and go out into the world, youre still a kook, with Zero evidence to back up your bullshit. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Damn yoo I got #pwned
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1 Finally, you swerved into the truth. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@Inediblekook. Prolly because they didnt use any bombs at all. It was a collapse due to the terrorist attacks.
Duh.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
9/11
MEMPHISBUTCHA 1 year ago
I don't think this "last wills" tape puts a "dent" in anything.
If anything it just hightlights a very unusual dance going on. It doesn't help shed any light on anything as far as I'm concerned.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb So, you were so HUMILIATED that you got caught lying (evidence does exist for the terrorist attack, while you have NOTHING) that you couldnt even sum up the courage to hit "reply." Because you KNEW id come back and laugh at you.
Your challenge was met. In return, you had ZERO to support your kookery. Edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 *Sigh* are you on every 9/11 video mr paid agent?
TrutherD1 1 year ago
@RetarD1
Sigh..So you admit your "tracking tool" is a lie. Otherwise you wouldnt have to ask.
Are you paid by Alqaeda for your treason? Or is it voluntary? =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@TrutherD1 This isn't a 9/11 video.
rgmztxy 1 year ago
"...investigators have “traced the origin of the funding of 9/11 back to financial accounts in Pakistan.’’
The Times of India first reported on October 10, 2001 that India told the US that some $100,000 had been wired to the leader of the hijackers, Mahmud Atta, by British-born terrorist Ahmad Saeed Umar Sheikh."
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 - inside job.
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
you don't see this kind of applause when they finish building something
radsimu 1 year ago 5
@radsimu wow! thats an amazing comment bro! best comment on youtube
zeekisathinker 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• It is interesting how we are constantly looking for associations in archetypes.. (subconsciously and consciously) If we cannot go to that parallel; point of reference.. we come up with whatever is close to that point.
TuesdayMorningInSept 1 year ago
bush inside job
datzfast 1 year ago
Edgeman is your typical Shill. He misrepresents arguments, behaves superciliously, has an inexplicable penchant for derision, and is impervious to logic. How he's managed to accumulate so many friends on YouTube when he's such a colossal ass is mind-boggling.
CHIPSTERO7 1 year ago
@CHIPSTERO7 LOL. Typical shill. meaning I debunked you losers. So you have to make some OTHER bullshit fantasy (ie, that people are actually paid to refute you) to cover for the humiliating ass beating I gave you.
::points and laughs::: EPIC FAIL! HAHAHAHHA
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
that sounded exactly from 9/11 when it fell
so bombs were planted
lenape09 1 year ago
you are stupid people hahaha
jake77348 1 year ago
it was a plane....had to be to come down like that
Mrreverendjim 2 years ago
agreed. a plane must have hit the building from behind to make it fall like that.
Squish888 2 years ago
i watched the twins come down. my first thought? "that sure did look like controlled demolition" (seen lots of them). that was followed by lots of second thoughts like "how could that ever be pulled off?" but regardless of how impossible something seems the fact remains that they fell like controlled demo. considering what is required to make any building fall through what would normally be the path of greatest resistance....well...
Mrreverendjim 2 years ago
@Mrreverendjim @Mrreverendjim Ive tyouve REALLY seen lots of them, youd know that demolitions blow out the lowest floors, and the buildings "telescopes" down. They dont blow up the building, floor by floor, from the top down, one floor at a time. Plus, the sounds of the explosives are unmistakable for MILES.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim Cont--So youre either lying about seeing lots of demolitions. Or lying about the demolitions you saw.
Pick one, I dont care which.
Further, you shouldnt use terms you dont understand. Like "path of most resistance." You look foolish. Google "intertia." its a start.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 insults are good. what do you think of architechs and engineers for 911 truth? just wondering because you don't seem very open minded.
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim its not an insult, its a FACT. youre either lying about seeing many demolitions before, OR youre lying about what you saw. Because irrefutably, they dont look alike.
Unlike yourself, Im VERY openminded. Just show me the invisible, govt demolition ninjas running into the buildings, using magical, invisible, silent explosives to take down the buildings.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Cont--As far as the AE911Kooks, just let me know when they start passing peer-review.
Its grossly hypocritical for you kooks to whine about people being open minded. YOU shitheads have already decided no matter WHAT you see, youll never accept the truth.
Me, on the other hand, am 100% open minded. Just show me the actual, direct evidence where I can see govt agents participating in the attacks.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 oh yes...good old peer review. seems they use this to control what gets out and to ridicule dissent at the same time. i just have questions, i dont really see anyone 100% able to convince me of anything either way concerning the how or why concerning this event. on the other hand you seem to have your mind made up. care to define open minded? and your incessant name calling and insults...well...that kind of behaviour speaks for itself.
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
"seems they use this to control what gets out"
Thats just a pussified, little twat cop-out to avoid facing the fact that REAL scientific community that actually KNOWS what the fux they are talking about laughs at you shitheads. No one who ACTUALLY knows wtf they are talking about takes you idiots seriously--because its pure BS. Rather than face the fact, you idiots come up with some worldwide, bullshit conspiracy to keep you idiots from getting credibly published. Pathetic. truly truly! =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim And, again, as you kooks do, you see the world in reverse STILL. YOU hve already made up your mind--no matter what you see, youll still push the inside job lie despite any facts or evidence.
I stated it plainly, and unmistakeably. Just go ahead and show me the credible, corroborated proof where I see govt agents wiring the buildings to explode. Ill believe it.
But you cant. why not? because its a fuxed in the head moronic lie with no basis in reality.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 just cant stop with the gutter mouth can you? do you know what debate is? didn't think so..you'ld rather insult and rant and so on. you know something? the difference between me and you is 911 is not my life. i looked at your channel. you need to get a life. jeez...its history man. come to think of it, maybe thats why i like yanking the chains of morons who are stupid enough to bite and expend so much energy on the ensueing bullshit. lol...fool.
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
MrLaden. Of course this is your life. All kooks are pathetic, lifeless dolts looking for meaning.
And yes, moron, I know what a debate is. And if YOU knew what one was, youd know that the primary requirements are Candor, Intelligence and a good faith attempt at the discussion. you EPIC fail all three.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Cont---You refuse to be honest, you are a moron, and are REFUSING to have the debate--instead you keep focusing on me.
So stop whining like a little bitch about me. have the debate about the REAL issue. Be honest. Show me the govt agents participating in the attacks, or be HONEST and admit it really didnt happen.
Bluff called, bitch. Thats the debate. Paritipate--show me the govt participation--or admir youre wrong.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 more gutter mouth. i was going to ignore you but i'm betting you will have to rant some more. you can always get a life, ya know. btw, how was i focusing on you? i made a comment and you went on a crusade. i am much more interested in the psycology of your obsession.
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim
Ignore Egdeman. He's highly accomplished at being a reprobate.
CHIPSTERO7 1 year ago
@CHIPSTERO7 yeah...but he's fun to tease. and i really am interested in the psycology of willful ignorance. i mean with the political, government and scientific communities i can understand the pressure. but joe public? you gotta wonder.
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
Translation: "Edge was too smart for Chip. Edge will debunk all your lies and make you face the fact--like he did with Chip--that youre a mindless moron duped into believing kookspiracies. So dont listen to him, or else youll see how wrong we were!" HAHAHAHA
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim OK, so Unable to have the debate, you AGAIN change the subject to me (gutter mouth..im more interested..etc).
So, you were given the choice, Show me the govt agents participating in the attacks OR admit it didnt happen.
You No-showed. You ADMIT it didnt happen.
So, only question left is "does alqaeda pay you to defend them on the web? Or are you a bottlicking, treasonous, Alqaeda supporter voluntarily?'
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 you back again? lol... you have found me out...i am hiding in a cave in afganistan, or is it iraq? well where ever the mainstream media says i am. i'm sure you'll believe it. man...you are obsessed....wow...did you know my alqaeda funded computer is a weapon of mass destruction? george was looking for it but he never found it. just thought you should know that george wouldn't lie about such things....
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim Bah blah Yawn. More obsessing over me.
All because you couldnt show me govt agents participating in the attacks.
And why are you scared to answer the question? Are you paid? or a volunteer? what do you have to HIDE Achmed?
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 why do i keep finding you when i check my messages? i believe you are obsessed. you refer to me as achmed...hmm...you know when i look at the world just taking things at face value...u know...the US administration fighting isreals wars and stuff...vids like the latest from wikileaks...all that fun historical stuff...i can see why there are arab terrorists, same reason as why there was an IRA. how do you feel about zionism and isreali terror against palistine.
regards, achmed
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim "why do i keep finding you when i check my messages?"
Translation--having been busted obsessing over me, he childishly tries to say "you too! Nenner neenr neener!"
Sorry shithead. this is a DISCUSSION forum. The difference is I discuss the ideas, YOU discuss ME. Obsession is all yours, Achmed. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 2 weeks and you cant leave it alone. whats wrong? no one biting? i haven't thought about this vid for weeks, but your still at it. that's obsession. have you thought about making a fragrance out of it? no, somebody beat you to it. you are behind the 8 ball, "edge"....again.
achmed
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
@Mrreverendjim So, STILL you talk about ME? Hmmmm. Puppet. I own your head. =]
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2
Mrreverendjim 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 agents? how about the entire bush admin, or at least the top members, if not all of them. the bush family is in oil. they hobnob with oil company execs, big bankers, weapons manufacture execs etc...and you don't think they're just waiting for a reason (ie. 911) to start a war? can you not see their motives? let me tell you buddy, they're counting on guys like you to be fooled and get behind their game. are you gonna fight for the people, or do what they tell you to?
randekio 1 year ago
@randekio Its one thing if you want to say they took advantage of a real, no shit terrorist attack for political gain. THAT is an issue where reasonable people can disagree.
However, thats a completely different issue from the moronic inside job claims. You are simply, chronically naive, and employ logical fallacies (false dichotemy). Try harder,
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 we have a body of evidence and an official explanation that leave many questions, we have financial motive, we know the government has lied to us in the past...put it all together and i just can't buy what i've been told. i don't know what happened, but they've obviously done a poor job of convincing me (and thousands of others) that it all happened the way they said it did. why don't we have a second (proper) investigation, then people like me can stop bothering people like you.
randekio 1 year ago
@randekio You dont have evidence. you have rumor, innuendo, speculation and conjecture. You can say "leave many questions." Thats really irrelevant. As such, simply because you dont understand what happened isnt evidence that it didnt happen.
its completely irrelevant if you "buy it" or not. your inability to comprehend is completely irrelevant to reality. The fact that you dont buy reality doesnt make it any less a reality.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 so are you telling me sir, that if a friend or colleague lied to you repeatedly you wouldn't lose trust in them? even if you have no proof? and they had motive? it gets to the point where you need concrete proof just to believe them. that is what trust is about sir. and if you believe the government blindly, then i say good luck to you sir. i'm not sure i believe the conspiracies, but you're the one that needs to come to grips with reality.
randekio 1 year ago
@randekio of COURSE you believe in the Kookspiracies. its the only way you could peddle that "wouldnt you lose trust in someone who lies to you" with a straight face.
Because without any doubt, the kook movement lies repeatedly and unabashedly. If you REALLY believed the shit you just wrote, you could NEVER doubt for a SECOND that the kookspiracies are false.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Cont--Further, your lack of any training in logic or analytcal thinking shines brightly. Just because govt lies to its people does NOT somehow make it impossible for that country to be attacked by terrorists. Its a false dichotemy. Logical fallacies so prevelant in the kook movement.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Cont-2 When evaluating competing explanations, and
1) one is an exact match, supported by facts, science, and observations, for what we saw. And we compare that to
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
cont-3: 2) an overly complex kookspiracy that couldnt happen in a million years because its so ridculously overlycomplex--requiring 10s of thousands to participate, Ignore all the observationsand just assume (without an cause) that its all fake? It requires us to assume thousands of baseless, idiotic claims?it requires us to pretend the whole world lies, except kooks?
When comparing those 2? Only an idiot gives #2 the light of day
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 look sir, you can't tell me what i believe and what i don't believe. you are not me. why do you think there are thousands (if not millions, and growing) of people that are asking questions about 911? because they've lost trust in their government, sir. even if it happened the way you say it did, there's a bunch of people who don't believe it. and rightly so. we have been lied to too many times to believe everything they say. this whole thing is about trust.
randekio 1 year ago
@ranLaden.
1) I am not telling you what you think. In fact, no one could ever, honestly describe what kooks do as thinking. Its a completely thoughtless, faith-based belief. In any event, it is YOU who is telling ME what you (which can only euphemistically be referred to as) "think."
2) Millions and growing. LMAO. Lets see, shall we? Loose Brains final cut, world premiere CANCELLED because no one showed. IN NY, where the metro area is over 10 million!!!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
2) cont--also in NY, on the 911 anniversary, Bermass could only get 3 people to "rally" with him (again, out of a metro area of over 10 million). the dick Gage, Fetzer et all give speeches to small handfuls of people at a time. Ray Griffin shills his book in Seattle (metro area 3.3 million) 30 people show up. Kooks sites get fewer and fewer hits each month, and have to go begging for donations--and ever some have branched out into bigfoot, UFO's and shit just to try and break even.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
cont--Kook Candidate, Ron Paul, Went down like a $4 hooker. "Getting kicked in the nuts" got more votes than RP got. Yeah. HUGE movement. HAHAHAHAHA. Sorry Achmed, the kook movement is collapsing at free fall speed. You have a better chance of finding a flat-Earther than finding a 911 kook.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
3) "its about trust!" LMAO. Bull-fuxing-shit! If it were about trust, youd never believe the kookspiracies. they are PROVED liars. Sorry, but kooks who hurl ridiculous slanders have NO credibility complaining about the lost trust. Youll never GET the trust back, if you insist on dishonesty and slander. Capice?
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 woah, i just realized (after i read a few comments on the actual tube) that you rant on, through multiple comments. I'm only getting the ones that read @randekio. i think you're obsessive, or possibly insane. i don't think i should correspond with you anymore. good luck, my friend.
randekio 1 year ago
@randekio "i don't think i should correspond with you"
Translation: "Edge is right. Rand cant defend his indefenisble treason against humanity. Terrified by any facts or logic that expose the idiocy of Rands kookspiratard religious beliefs, Rands instinct is to run away and hide. So rather than accept that he was wrong, he's going to run off and bury the empty head in the sand."
Understood.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 i hope i can say this without hurting your feelings, or insulting you. please realize sir, it's not normal to be ranting on through dozens of comments like this. And after reading some of their content, i think you may have a mental illness. if left unchecked, it can get worse over time. if you don't have professional help already, i hope you'll at least go for an evaluation. good luck, and take care my friend. peace and love. R
randekio 1 year ago
@randekio " it's not normal to be ranting on through dozens of comments like this."
And yet you persist? I noticed that (as all uneducated religious kooks do), you attack the person instead of adressing the issues.
Please, cry some more for me! Whine about how mean I was! I fuxing LOVE that shit! HAHAHAHAHAA
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EdgemanLL2 you're not telling me what i think? your exact words were-- "of COURSE you believe in the Kookspiracies. its the only way you could peddle that "wouldnt you lose trust in someone who lies to you" with a straight face."--Huh? can you see me? i'm starting to doubt your sanity.
look sir, i live in canada, and i see more and more people talking about 911, in mainstream media. for example, just last month CBC did an hour long expose on 911 with experts on both sides of the issue.
randekio 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 "completely thoughtless, faith-based belief" Yes, the official conspiracy theory is this. When you can actually come up with some evidence that 19 hijackers led by Bin Laden did 9/11, then we can change what you just said in the quotes.
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb <--the PeeWee Herman Defense "I know you are but what am I?"
You forgot the "neener neener neener" at the end.
No evidence, huh? Besides them admitting it repeatedly? Besides the hijacking being on the plane, and identified by the flight attendants, by seat number? Besides al Jazeera airing video "last wills" where they brag about the attacks, before it happened, with OBL sitting next to them?
Yeah, if you ignore all the evidence, there is none! LMAO
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
We have all that, and the peer-reviewed science that absolutely supports what happened.
what do you shitheads have?
1) Do you have govt agents confessing over and over "We attacked the US on 911?"
2) You have crew members calling in the hijacking saying "Dick Cheney just hijacked my plane and killed the crew?
Have ANYTHING AT ALL?
Or will you take the bitchified way out and just pretend all the evidence doesnt count?
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 " Besides them admitting it repeatedly? " Very vague, who is "them".
"identified by the flight attendants, by seat number?" Yet you can't name the flight number or the flight attendants by name. Not very sound evidence. Alot of things wrong with the tape you mention. 1st, it's authenticity can't be verified, and there are many more problems with it. So where is your evidence of your outlandish and crazy story? Do you have ANYTHING AT ALL?
charlesfloyb 1 year ago
@charlesfloyb Yet none of your avoidance refutes the facts.
Evidence was presented, you simply avoid it. As predicted.
Now, do YOU have anything at all?
If not, edge wins!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Really smart companies use Straight Diesel Fuel because on 911?WTC 10,000 gal of diesel fuel concentrated on 10 stories Pulverized all the 110 stories of steel reinforced concrete floors. Even the CORE had Steel reinforced concrete for at least 10 stories and it, too, is Gone. Smart Demo Co' are using Diesel in trying economic times. Makes Cents.
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago 2
Even better! NIST says old furniture burning for 6 hours is enough. Let´s make a bonfire for bush and cheney.
pcuimac 1 year ago
@pcuimac That will end the noise pollution caused by blowing things up. Just set it on fire with some diesel fuel and then toss office furniture on it and you have a controlled demolition for 110 acres per WTC..
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
@IExposeMormonism LOL. yeah, youd have a controlled demolition that destroys or damages a dozen nearby buildings.
Yep! yeah! do that. Do demolitions THAT way. Then go out of business after the first one because 1) you have to repair or replace dozens of nearby buildings and 2) youll never get insurance again.
Good thinking, idiot.
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
@EdgemanLL2 Oh, shove off, Larry Silverstein was insured and re-insured. It's a sure fire proposition. So to speak.
IExposeMormonism 1 year ago
@Moron. But you werent talking about LS. You were asking when demo companies dont use fires to bring down buildings. I explained why,
As far as LS goes (idiot) since he BORROWED money to finance the leases, his insurance payment would be required to go to either 1) paying off the loans OR rebuilding the buildings to provide collateral for the loan. Hence Larry dont see a DIME! Ooops!
EdgemanLL2 1 year ago
Comment removed
IExposeMormonism 2 years ago
I flagged this video!
primatt60 2 years ago
ive flagged this video for adults fighting at 0:05
TheSuicideAttacker 2 years ago
im startin to wonder wut really happen on 9/11
ERIKTHEBEST 2 years ago
i still dont get y they clap lol
fnogyrabyore 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch "Ring of Power".
Disinfo:
TrutherD1 2 years ago
real talk this shit is stupid y put some body getting jumped on the fuckin internet
09malcolm 2 years ago
And this video proves what?
talltatguy 2 years ago
This video proves that unles you can produce magic thermite that can
1) explode sideways, quietly, and defy the laws of gravity by flowing sideways many feet at a time instantly
or
2) produce magical, silent explosives that do not flash or bang...
Then this proves the impossibility of a CD. Because explosions make noise. Just the way REAL LIFE is.
Reality refutes kooks every time.
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
It proves that trolls will reply to your comments.
Pikers81 2 years ago
You being proof....
EdgemanLL2 2 years ago
Find out about "chemtrails". There's a secret program going on world-wide! Check my vids I filmed it!
TrutherD1 2 years ago
ROFL that's the fucking ugliest building in the world :D everybody were so happy when it blowed up ..or down but why americans always explode everything? O_o can't they just break it little more carefully
isokessu 2 years ago
@isokessu Why would you piddle away at the job, when you can just do it more quickly and cheaply? It's the American way, haha.
soco13466 2 years ago
whats with the ass kicking at the start?
PivotStorm 2 years ago
ITs a quick summary of what humans are..we enjoy destruction and ass kicking..lol
is just in our blood ...ahaa
legendz53 2 years ago
yeeeeeees... muha... MUHAHA... MUHAHAHAHA! MUAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!
PivotStorm 2 years ago