Flame would often spit out of the Me-262's Junkers 004 turbojets while pressure built up in the compression section of the engine and excess fuel (injected) pooled.
The CG is great. I think what people are objecting to is that they are looking for video of actual aircraft. If you put CG in the title, I think you would lose the compaints. It would also be useful to searches looking to find computer generated graphics. ;-)
Is this what you do with your life.. ANYONE can take flight sim clips and pollute Youtube in lieu of historical account and real footage. The should make a special service called "simtube" for people who are alive in the absence of living....
Everyone on YouTube is a connoisseur of CGI. I receive mail hating my Second Life videos because "It's not real". This is laughable. ALL these experts turn out NOTHING, they are posers who have opinions and no body of work to show. They just LOVE to criticize, that is their thing to do here... ignore them, they are losers. The sounds on this should be redone to be more 'turbine', it's true, remember NAZI tech was slow warmup... but otherwise it looks fine. I like it.
@doceigen Thanks. I dont mind if people call this bad. People who dont contribute with anything, dont get my attension. This animation was made years ago, in a period of learning.
@nimbalo300 I was the Tail gunner they were flying as fast but not as fast as the Me-262 is able to fly. It turned away from my B-17 and I let off a hail of bullets and I hit it and it exploded.
sigh, hello, people? i dont see anywhere in the description saying this is/was a to scale real life representation of a historic event.
Its a demonstration of various effects using 3d modeling/animation software. Which isnt bad in that sense - considering i have no idea what the capabilities of the programs used even are.
may not look real and true to life but it looks fine as a visual effects demonstration - knupps, dont let the bashers put you off, keep working on it
There are a sum total of NO afterburners on a 262. No research was done by the Germans on afterburners. The British started reseaearch on the subject (Wiki search the term "jetpipe reheat miles M.62"). Later the idea was explored by Chance Vaught (US), Pratt & Wittney (US), Rolls Royce (UK), Iroqousi (US), and De Havilland (UK). NO Germans had afterburners. Simples.
You are kind with serious stuff. Did you know this plane can not be acelerate too fast? You certainly do not know nothing about to pilot with only a broked leg and the other cutted off. Did you know? Play, like a child, for ever....
I was going to say that there were no afterburners in 1944/45 but someone beat me to it. If you made the movements more realistic it'd be great. I thought it was a neat animation.
why do they show flames from the engines, even in real jets there are only certain situations where the exhaust is visibly illuminated (night or early dawn). I cant believe they would make such a mistake
True, they did not have after burners but late in the war the Luftwaffe only had diesel fuel and the engines would make flames out the back on start up.
@ironfalcon100 that aren't after burners if you know anything the engines on them are temperamental and you couldn't go from 0 to 100% quickly without catching fire like that
@ironfalcon100 Yes, that is correct, and many say that the junkers engines never had afterburners at all, but the B model of the the Me-262 did, but as it says in the video this is the Me-262 1A so, it wouldn't have had after burners.
@ironfalcon100 Well, lets say this "generation zero" of jet engines had serious problems to keep fire in the chamber, so it may be considered a flaming off.. Instead the real ME262 needed kilometers of road to take of. This is the first jet ever seen capable of taking off in just 5 - 6 meters of space!! :D
One of the first (active) ME-262's crashed on take off The pilot was a 109 ace The story was told from another 109/ 262 ace pilot This pilot also escorted a B-17 towards home after seeing all the damage that was done to it out of respect he saluted him and headed back
It went transsonic but only a handful 262 pilots lived to tell the tale as the stress to the airframe caused structural failure. Indeed some 262s may have broken the sound barrier, but none of those pilots survived.
doesn't really matter. the allied Bomber fortresses were to powerful and to many of them for the Luftwaffe to handle. Maybe the war would have lasted another year MAX.
powerfull ? Not really . On bloody thursday , luft shot down 60 B-17s with prop planes . Americans stop bombing for 2 weeks to rethink bombing tactics. little over 200 262's saw comabt . JG7 alone shot down 500+ aircraft with their 262's , most were all bombers . Not saying they could have won the war , german had no fuel or material . But only 1 shell from a 30MM could split the wing on B-17. not counting the 24 rockets under the wing .
Your right, 262's and other Prototype's did shoot down plenty of bomber's. But not all were 17's. A lot were 24's and 25's which were much easier to kill.
Im talking about the general Luftwaffe. The US air force just kept them coming and coming. It sometimes took half of ammunition to take down a 17 or 25 and they had to RTB. There is some stories of just 1 bomber taking down 3-5 jet's and 10-15 prop fighters. But in the end the allies just had to much numbers on their side.
That is highly unlikely that even happend once , let alone more then twice . If they kept their speed up , the Bendix gun turrets of a B-17 could not even track a Me262 let alone for accurate deflection shooting.
unlikely? just look at the B-17 in Northwest Germany who took down 2 ME's, i cant remember hte pilots but I will search it. And why isn't it highly unlikely? most of the pilots who were in those 262's had been armature's anyway since Germany was so desperate to put stuff in the air. These guys were not pro's as doing high dive's and side swoops. They just came from the back in a line. And the Turret's had clean shots.
unlikely . You said alone Me262 shot down very little B17's . Plus the rarity of the 262's . So who are the B17 jet ace's ? I assume you're speaking for the last three months of the war . The first selection of 262 pilots were all Ace's ... Die Jet Experten what they were known as . it was hard enough for a gunner turret to shot down a prop plane let alone a jet . Again , the Bendix gun turrets had extream difficulty traking high speed jet .
me262 took off longer than any propeller a/c. It didnt have any afterburners and it was extremely hard to pilot, some aces burned themselves or got killed as a result.
I have seen trailers for that game it looks amazing. But that was made by an entire team of people this is one man. I think this video is made very well.
well this plane bring us many modern planes :P well germans DID invent the first engines like this then shared wiht russia and afteer the war uk usa and other countries 'stole' theyre planes and work...
Convict..this is incorrect.Search Sir Frank Whittle.1945 we had the Gloucester Meteor.After WWII Rolls Royce sent Russia 40 x jet engines,thinking that russia would remain an ally.Russia did not have the technology to produce required alloys.
Germany had better jets than Britain and the US. Me-262 was a much better fighter design. The He-162 was also a better design. the Germans were also developing a much more advanced plane called the Ta-183 which were to be armed with 4 air-to-air guided missiles and were comparable to F-86 Sabres and Vietnam War era MiG-17s. They even had a stealth fighter prototype flying called the Horten 229, and a stealth heavy nuclear capable strategic bomber, the Horten-18 with the range to hit New York.
Its not fake retard.
TylerAssady 1 day ago
FAKE
jk :D
TimeFadesMemoryLasts 1 month ago
Flame would often spit out of the Me-262's Junkers 004 turbojets while pressure built up in the compression section of the engine and excess fuel (injected) pooled.
n74jw 1 month ago
FAIL the ME262 had no afterburners but its a nice video ;)
DeadChick100 2 months ago
The ME-262 didn't have after burners. Do your research before making a horrible incorrect cgi.
Travis8620 2 months ago
I'm part german and hate nazis
Scott32Austin 2 months ago
excellent work..don't uderstand why everyones moaning?..it clearly says CGI in the title??
rebelwithoutaporsche 3 months ago
ahahahaaa ok :)
newsgamer4u2d 3 months ago
It really isn't that bad, man.
FalconKPD 4 months ago
Buy Il-2 Sturmovik 1946, then remake this video, and it would be much better,
StandardCards 4 months ago
I came here and gave you a thumbs up just because you had the decency to precise "CGI" in the title.
rolfen 4 months ago
The CG is great. I think what people are objecting to is that they are looking for video of actual aircraft. If you put CG in the title, I think you would lose the compaints. It would also be useful to searches looking to find computer generated graphics. ;-)
MrJdsenior 4 months ago
RealityCheeker, why do you says that is is not an historical video? There are ME262 and b17 so what's wrong?
And you says that anyone can do that so send me a p51 takeoff...
Hawx1163 4 months ago
Is this what you do with your life.. ANYONE can take flight sim clips and pollute Youtube in lieu of historical account and real footage. The should make a special service called "simtube" for people who are alive in the absence of living....
RealiteeChecker 4 months ago
Everyone on YouTube is a connoisseur of CGI. I receive mail hating my Second Life videos because "It's not real". This is laughable. ALL these experts turn out NOTHING, they are posers who have opinions and no body of work to show. They just LOVE to criticize, that is their thing to do here... ignore them, they are losers. The sounds on this should be redone to be more 'turbine', it's true, remember NAZI tech was slow warmup... but otherwise it looks fine. I like it.
doceigen 4 months ago 9
@doceigen Thanks. I dont mind if people call this bad. People who dont contribute with anything, dont get my attension. This animation was made years ago, in a period of learning.
knupps 4 months ago
i was no looking for this sorta video, and for a CGI it was pretty shit
tracker2241 5 months ago
urrrrr a fogggot
theknifekid 5 months ago
@theknifekid .... and you are? Keep your faul language to yourself.
knupps 5 months ago
Did you take the sound for this out of a satellite launch? Doesnt sound one bit like a turbine.
Synaps4 5 months ago
lame
wadeyearsago 5 months ago
that was pretty bad
Brian79camino 5 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Death to the Muslims and Christians .. Long live Israel a Jewish state
ISRAEL10F 5 months ago
worse animation ever
hatecrewsix2 6 months ago
Me 262 is a flying kerosene flammable jet couple bullets to the wing area it's dead.
pvtsoap262 6 months ago
@pvtsoap262 yea good luck hitting it
nimbalo300 6 months ago
@nimbalo300 I've hit it a couple time's in a game called B-17 the Mighty Eighth.
pvtsoap262 6 months ago
@pvtsoap262 no comment -_-
nimbalo300 6 months ago
@nimbalo300 I was the Tail gunner they were flying as fast but not as fast as the Me-262 is able to fly. It turned away from my B-17 and I let off a hail of bullets and I hit it and it exploded.
pvtsoap262 6 months ago
Why do you people feel the need to put animations or computer games on here??? seriously....Go get laid or bash one out!!!
camer81 6 months ago
that... was.... retarted
ZELDAFAN152 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ლ(ಠ益ಠლ
Zombieuprising96 7 months ago
....this is shit...and when Jumo 004 had afterburners?...bullshit animation...
happycrap23 7 months ago
you are a fucking cock if the highest order posting pc game footage ya prick .. i was hoping for the genuine article
colintraveller 8 months ago
take off looks retarted it just like hovers up
Arbiter11723 10 months ago 19
......gay
pwnasaurus33 10 months ago
Fuckin gamers.
apoypto 10 months ago
be cool....the title should say [sim]
TheRocketSilo 11 months ago
Yep. This one has the tricycle gear. Sorry for effing up.
artcore3030 11 months ago
Has to go down the runway. Pilot hits the brakes slightly to get nose up. THEN take off.
artcore3030 11 months ago
@artcore3030
They only had to hit the breaks when the Me-262 had the tail wheel this 1 dosn't so it dosn't need to.
jimmyxx3 11 months ago
Write FS in the title next time fag
MaverickOnTheMoon 1 year ago
guys... HES JUST TESTING OUT 3D PROGRAMS! WHERE IN THE HELL DO U READ THAT THIS IS REAL? HUH! FUCK OFF LOSERS! >:C
gokuta333 1 year ago
Czajnikiem robiłeś tą animację ?
Cube47pl 1 year ago
Lol
HuutavaOrgasmi 1 year ago
sigh, hello, people? i dont see anywhere in the description saying this is/was a to scale real life representation of a historic event.
Its a demonstration of various effects using 3d modeling/animation software. Which isnt bad in that sense - considering i have no idea what the capabilities of the programs used even are.
may not look real and true to life but it looks fine as a visual effects demonstration - knupps, dont let the bashers put you off, keep working on it
kineticdeath 1 year ago
a German Pilot said it took around 40 seconds for a Me-262 to get off the ground cause of the weight of the jets...
jasincl 1 year ago
There are a sum total of NO afterburners on a 262. No research was done by the Germans on afterburners. The British started reseaearch on the subject (Wiki search the term "jetpipe reheat miles M.62"). Later the idea was explored by Chance Vaught (US), Pratt & Wittney (US), Rolls Royce (UK), Iroqousi (US), and De Havilland (UK). NO Germans had afterburners. Simples.
Hanglands 1 year ago
I enjoyed the realistic takeoff..
richerite 1 year ago
lol it takes of in like 10 feet and the engines would of been blow out lol
rostereas 1 year ago
.........MISLEADING...........
zathras1000 1 year ago
why dont you idiots label it a cartoon stupid
TheMikesylv 1 year ago 2
what game?
zabuzarocks14 1 year ago
@zabuzarocks14 game?
ZELDAFAN152 1 year ago
Looping sound ruined it.
spymak7 1 year ago
Declare it's animation in the title.
ManRen1 1 year ago
Your missing one original marking on the tail.
freaklemon 1 year ago
il2 stumovik???
TheNERFDUDE97 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrJord1994 1 year ago
@TheNERFDUDE97 no
i think its a self done animation
DRFTR566 1 year ago
Deine Modelle sehn ja gut aus, aber der Start is Unrealistisch. sofort starten, ohne zu Beschleunigen. Naja...
DienerDesErbauers 1 year ago
thats crap, not realistic
XSparrow76X 1 year ago
the me262 looked like a flying shark
eba2294 1 year ago 2
looks like a single person made this
heisenfeis 1 year ago
That looks really unrealisistick
logantheace 1 year ago
You are kind with serious stuff. Did you know this plane can not be acelerate too fast? You certainly do not know nothing about to pilot with only a broked leg and the other cutted off. Did you know? Play, like a child, for ever....
adauto3000 1 year ago
I was going to say that there were no afterburners in 1944/45 but someone beat me to it. If you made the movements more realistic it'd be great. I thought it was a neat animation.
111olbap 1 year ago
No more CGs!
MsYama55 1 year ago
Took off in less than 5m, I don't think so.
eckyspondoolie 1 year ago
WTF? I thought it was a real one WTH?
chamath1985 1 year ago
me 262 was nasty stuff for alies :D
dfrss 1 year ago
@dfrss The only good thing we had against the -262 during WW2 was (1) the jet's short loiter time and (2) it was slow to throttle up.
SenorSpode 1 year ago
why do they show flames from the engines, even in real jets there are only certain situations where the exhaust is visibly illuminated (night or early dawn). I cant believe they would make such a mistake
yakovlev3a 1 year ago
bla,bla,bla.....
Urkraft2010 1 year ago
absurd video. Tired to see FSX boring recordings.
Antagraber 1 year ago
afterburners?
WunderDoob 1 year ago
super me62
kozak1874 1 year ago
@kozak1874 LOL, THAT WOULD BE AWESOME!!!
harris3693 1 year ago
Me 262 love super
kozak1874 1 year ago
IL-2 Sturmovik is better
NutzerYOu 1 year ago
@NutzerYOu More Il-2 Sturmoviks were made than any other combat aircraft, at over 41,000.
SenorSpode 1 year ago
@SenorSpode ich mean the game il2 sturmovik!!
NutzerYOu 1 year ago
God, it looks like a kick ass video game 8)
megadog200 1 year ago
failgraphic.
NimaSify 1 year ago
Absurd takeoff. You made it look like a short takeoff landing aircraft
coy0te9 1 year ago
Put animated in the fucking title! I hate these douche bag cartoons.
smokeddirky 1 year ago 2
wie schäbig
gekko434 1 year ago
they don't have afterburners...
mounsteres 1 year ago
Very nice hehe:)
Duchovicius 1 year ago
q merda
templuca 1 year ago
really fast take off
but a good video
TheOceanFighter 1 year ago
lol
worlds quickest takeoff xD
iroxsmelly 1 year ago
Nice Takeoff! (in 2 seconds that is...)
28thBobbyplane 1 year ago
Welcher arschloch postet so scheißvideos. danke
mad762 2 years ago
@mad762
1. lern erstmal deutsch
2. was ist an diesem video auszusetzen?
gibt sehr viel unnötigere videos auf youtube
kokksi 1 year ago
Shit, the pilot are smoking weed!
TheIcaJerry 2 years ago
if i saw those commin at me i'd be saying holy shit
ArkanianMicroStudio 2 years ago
when they are rolling the control surfaces should move, but other than that well done.
sharter15 2 years ago
schneidemuhl
HARDCORE1982BRK 2 years ago
the take off was lame you cannot take off so quik but nice made
1makermovie 2 years ago 2
they can practically leap into the air in reality
wlh1us 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that almost looks fake....
INFORISISY 2 years ago
put in name: CGI ANIMATION this is not real, thanks
asolutionforyou 2 years ago 4
The Junkers Jumo 004 turbojets never had afterburners.
ironfalcon100 2 years ago 108
Yes but this is a cartoon.
paullubliner 2 years ago 2
@ironfalcon100,
True, they did not have after burners but late in the war the Luftwaffe only had diesel fuel and the engines would make flames out the back on start up.
DrMotorDude 2 years ago
@ironfalcon100
kozak1874 1 year ago
@ironfalcon100 ...ridiculous...afterburners were invented by the British.....AFTER the war
Aussiephil99 1 year ago
@ironfalcon100 that aren't after burners if you know anything the engines on them are temperamental and you couldn't go from 0 to 100% quickly without catching fire like that
rostereas 1 year ago
@ironfalcon100 Yes, that is correct, and many say that the junkers engines never had afterburners at all, but the B model of the the Me-262 did, but as it says in the video this is the Me-262 1A so, it wouldn't have had after burners.
recreatedtiger 7 months ago
@ironfalcon100 Well, lets say this "generation zero" of jet engines had serious problems to keep fire in the chamber, so it may be considered a flaming off.. Instead the real ME262 needed kilometers of road to take of. This is the first jet ever seen capable of taking off in just 5 - 6 meters of space!! :D
SettimaLegione 6 months ago
At 0:28 these bombers were the british Avro Lancasters.
Latvietis96 2 years ago
i guess those are rather B-24 ;)
juliantom182 2 years ago
Das tut weh! Ein spiel und miese Grafik!
NetterFreund1 2 years ago
Der schloeden undst der krieden flauter!
worthlessdollar1 2 years ago
Der hat das animiert...........depp.
mistaknista1907 2 years ago
game?
recell312 2 years ago
i love the sound of this plane's engines.
SP33D3Rz 2 years ago
Graphics are not bad, but the take off and other moves don´t look very realistic..
michiel1403 2 years ago 50
@michiel1403 they suck
SacredAfro 1 year ago
@michiel1403 Reminded me of an episode of Stargate SG-1...
SenorSpode 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shit
levijr76 2 years ago
cool
ScreamingEagle04756 2 years ago
Your engines must be on fire. The only "afterburners" on the 262 were the flames when it crashed.
AgentJayZ 2 years ago 3
lolz
77794471 2 years ago
LONG LIVE IL-2
dwah18 2 years ago
I think it was a bit to smooth, like it was on rails
PzOwNeD 2 years ago
the sound was from an F/A-18, i know this, i used the sound in one of my X-plane models
planefreak3 2 years ago
чушь какая
Fktrc70 2 years ago
crap and pointless video if you ask me..
Nightrapture 2 years ago
no one did
Dragonsway 2 years ago
One of the first (active) ME-262's crashed on take off The pilot was a 109 ace The story was told from another 109/ 262 ace pilot This pilot also escorted a B-17 towards home after seeing all the damage that was done to it out of respect he saluted him and headed back
freakyflow 2 years ago
wow, as in the 262 pilot thought it'd been damaged enough so let him go?
jaw1024 2 years ago
nicer than i would have been. that yank would have had four cannons lighting up his ass.
Keinlicht 2 years ago
haha, that's the general ruthless attitude everyone has on IL-2 :P. Even the AI are like that
jaw1024 2 years ago
I would have blown that Ami out of the sky after bombing little German kids. That GErman pilot who spared that bomber was far too nice.
FinalWar1444 2 years ago
Attacking civilians is against the Geneva Conventions and also fits the definition of "Terrorism" so yeah, he was far too nice.
HerrGeneralVonBraun 2 years ago
first super sonick jat^^
DeluXenSS 2 years ago
It never went super sonic
Dpedersen35 2 years ago 4
It went transsonic but only a handful 262 pilots lived to tell the tale as the stress to the airframe caused structural failure. Indeed some 262s may have broken the sound barrier, but none of those pilots survived.
33vortex 2 years ago 3
Cool, it's like an old fashioned Red Alert cutscene! Great job! ;)
Denta92 2 years ago
Nice Takeoff! (in 2 seconds that is)
IAUnitedFilms 2 years ago 5
lol ill say
cs512tr 2 years ago
GARBAGE
xentroliat 2 years ago 4
MMMM
TOPCAMERMAN 2 years ago
what the hell, afterburners? never knew they were even invented a back then! LOL
nunvikingsofthesea 2 years ago 6
Yes, the Me262 never had afterburners.
mick431 2 years ago
this is so stupid. why do you think that this is interesting?
vitotiv 2 years ago
Shortest takeoff ever
Goose511th 2 years ago 2
beautiful :D
can you imagine if the ME-262 had entered service earlier? God only knows what would have happened.
RJfan 3 years ago 4
doesn't really matter. the allied Bomber fortresses were to powerful and to many of them for the Luftwaffe to handle. Maybe the war would have lasted another year MAX.
DarkHour404 2 years ago
True. Me-262 would just made the war even more brutal in the air than it was, and was plenty brutal.
cmorris975 2 years ago
powerfull ? Not really . On bloody thursday , luft shot down 60 B-17s with prop planes . Americans stop bombing for 2 weeks to rethink bombing tactics. little over 200 262's saw comabt . JG7 alone shot down 500+ aircraft with their 262's , most were all bombers . Not saying they could have won the war , german had no fuel or material . But only 1 shell from a 30MM could split the wing on B-17. not counting the 24 rockets under the wing .
RudeRaptor 2 years ago
Your right, 262's and other Prototype's did shoot down plenty of bomber's. But not all were 17's. A lot were 24's and 25's which were much easier to kill.
Im talking about the general Luftwaffe. The US air force just kept them coming and coming. It sometimes took half of ammunition to take down a 17 or 25 and they had to RTB. There is some stories of just 1 bomber taking down 3-5 jet's and 10-15 prop fighters. But in the end the allies just had to much numbers on their side.
DarkHour404 2 years ago
That is highly unlikely that even happend once , let alone more then twice . If they kept their speed up , the Bendix gun turrets of a B-17 could not even track a Me262 let alone for accurate deflection shooting.
RudeRaptor 2 years ago
unlikely? just look at the B-17 in Northwest Germany who took down 2 ME's, i cant remember hte pilots but I will search it. And why isn't it highly unlikely? most of the pilots who were in those 262's had been armature's anyway since Germany was so desperate to put stuff in the air. These guys were not pro's as doing high dive's and side swoops. They just came from the back in a line. And the Turret's had clean shots.
DarkHour404 2 years ago
unlikely . You said alone Me262 shot down very little B17's . Plus the rarity of the 262's . So who are the B17 jet ace's ? I assume you're speaking for the last three months of the war . The first selection of 262 pilots were all Ace's ... Die Jet Experten what they were known as . it was hard enough for a gunner turret to shot down a prop plane let alone a jet . Again , the Bendix gun turrets had extream difficulty traking high speed jet .
RudeRaptor 2 years ago
Wtf take off in 2 meters? o_O Since when that was true?
Convict147 3 years ago 3
lol i noticed that ! :))
dragonkilla7 3 years ago
i loled at that....
withthebeatles7000 3 years ago
extremely strong headwind perhaps? lol
camwizardoz 3 years ago 2
one Ho-229 prototype
EmperorTiger 3 years ago
Video game. Meh
706jim 3 years ago
looks weird^^
but best plane ever.
EXITUS01 3 years ago
nice takeoff.. in 2 seconds.. XD
layup91 3 years ago 3
me262 took off longer than any propeller a/c. It didnt have any afterburners and it was extremely hard to pilot, some aces burned themselves or got killed as a result.
hugostv 3 years ago
did the pane take off in 2 seconds
balongaboy 3 years ago 4
the me262 doesnt have afterburners just to let you know
muthatrukka24 3 years ago 5
maddox?
shicetube 3 years ago
Hm I think you got to early into the sky.
Haniel93 3 years ago
The engineers behind the F-35 Lightning have retrofitted this Me-262 with STOVL capabilities...
AndyBones1978 3 years ago
LOL
EmperorTiger 3 years ago
it's not professional looking but the creator must have put a whole lot of days into this.
slopedarmor 3 years ago
Its not great, the whole thing just doesn't look right, compare what is in this video with an IL2 ME262
moomoo1337 3 years ago
i completely agree,the in game recordings of a ME 262 looks/sounds a lot better then this animation. but i give him an A for the effort
jshkorn 3 years ago
I have seen trailers for that game it looks amazing. But that was made by an entire team of people this is one man. I think this video is made very well.
Ryan1m 3 years ago
Favorite plane of WW2
I like it more then the P-51 Mustang!
thats coming from a 12 year old...
BlueArtStudios 3 years ago
well this plane bring us many modern planes :P well germans DID invent the first engines like this then shared wiht russia and afteer the war uk usa and other countries 'stole' theyre planes and work...
Convict147 3 years ago
Convict..this is incorrect.Search Sir Frank Whittle.1945 we had the Gloucester Meteor.After WWII Rolls Royce sent Russia 40 x jet engines,thinking that russia would remain an ally.Russia did not have the technology to produce required alloys.
banoffee2001 3 years ago
Well, this plane was the FIRST jet plane that flew in WW2
Convict147 3 years ago
wrong, it was the first Jet Fighter to go into service in WWII (its not the same thing)
EmperorTiger 3 years ago
Germany had better jets than Britain and the US. Me-262 was a much better fighter design. The He-162 was also a better design. the Germans were also developing a much more advanced plane called the Ta-183 which were to be armed with 4 air-to-air guided missiles and were comparable to F-86 Sabres and Vietnam War era MiG-17s. They even had a stealth fighter prototype flying called the Horten 229, and a stealth heavy nuclear capable strategic bomber, the Horten-18 with the range to hit New York.
EmperorTiger 3 years ago