Human Capital refers to the individual skill, knowledge, and talent possessed by each individual. All Brzezinski is saying is that Haiti has capital in the form of talented and knowledgable personal that can help revitalize the country if the right conditions and opportunities are established. Most probably UN support will be required to establish these favourable conditions.
@westinpbnewman "UN support will be required", first you preach the for the Lord then you say they need help from the beast system, you sound like a forked tounge serpent like the one you speak of. You cannot serve to masters, repent. Yeshua is Lord.
He went on to say in that interview, "What is most important to the history of the world? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?" When the interviewer questioned him about Islamic fundamentalism representing a world menace, Brzezinski said, "Nonsense!"
In 1998, Brzezinski was interviewed by the French newspaper Nouvel Observateur on the topic of Afghanistan. He revealed that CIA support for the mujaheddin had started before the 1979 Soviet invasion. Brzezinski saw the invasion as an opportunity to embroil the Soviet Union in a bloody conflict comparable to the US experience in Vietnam. He referred to this as the "Afghan Trap" and viewed the end of the Soviet empire as worth the cost of strengthening militant Islamic groups.
I suspect 'they' are watching the people in Haiti right now to see how they are responding to the different situations i.e. no food, no shelter, grief, sink of death, hopelessness. At somepoint they will play the people into submission simply by observing.
The lack of effective international help is affecting them ORis it the effect of all that US military gumming up the works.
The only other thing I could add would be control with: fearterrorfearterrorfearterrorfearfearfearfearterror
Therefore, Zbigniew Brzezinski might just consider the loss of 100,000 lives in Haiti as an elimination of toxic investments. Since studying The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I have had issues with some of Adam Smith's concepts, particularly the "invisible hand," which remarkably resembles Luciferian doctrine.
Absolute bullshit Ecn.101 If Adam Smith had chosen the term God versus use "invisible hand" we would all be asking who was Adam Smith. The Principle of Self interest helped determine the Laws of Supply & Demand. Natural Laws which like gravity can not be denied. Fact: Classic economic theory has proven self interest pitted against itself in a free market generates abundance. Conversely, that same self interest in Controlled Market economies guarantys scarcity and shortages.
@waketheoblivious Your right, what you espouse is standard programming in ECN 101. But, the term "Invisible Hand" of Lucifer, not God, fits in the doctrine more appropriately. It will take alot more than Smith, ECN 101 and your programmed response to convince me the greed of the ultra-rich is a benefit to humanity. Furthermore, you obviously fail to grasp the difference between a theory and what you refer to as a "natural law (i.e. "THEORY of Moral Sentiments).
@waketheoblivious Some regulation of the market is necessary to ensure an ethical code of conduct. Otherwise, the "free market" will not remain free, and the corporate elite with "old money" will immediately stifle any competition, just as they have done already. The lack of proper regulation has led to corporate ownership of the govt, and now the intl. corporate elite makes the rules for their own benefit, to the detriment of any fair competition.
The free market will remain free when people quit debating Democrat/Republican Liberal/Conservative and focus on corruption and deception. Satanists/Atheist have zero value to humanity and are the cause of all problems. Corruption is mental kryptonite. Simple enough every Politician and Public Official required to take a lie detector wired to an electric chair. Afraid to take the test, dont't run for office and work in the private industry. Homepage Digital Democracy.
@waketheoblivious I agree the heart of the problem is corruption and deception, I just think Smith's doctrine, like Brzezinski, is part of the problem. It is a distortion of the truth, and typical of Luciferian doctrine.
Bingo! Exactly, Deception is the essence of Evil. The resulting corruption can not be ignored as the corrupt pigs change the rules to destroy the farm as they advance a Luciferian/Satanic/Atheist agenda for a one world dictator. Tis an honor to share the planet and defend God and Country with you RoninSamurai.
@waketheoblivious Adam Smith himself was a Scottish noble and in his works regularly referred to the "Great Architect of the Universe" (Freemasonry's term for Lucifer as admitted by 33rd degree Freemasons Albert Pike and Manly P. Hall). He was therefore likely a Freemason (and perhaps Luciferian) himself. As an indoctrinated noble, he was protecting his own self-interests when he wrote his THEORY. You should bear in mind the ruling class determined what you learned in college.
The Principle of Self Interest helped determine the Laws of Supply and Demand. Natural laws just like grafity, deny you still die. Self interest pitted against itself in a Free Market generates abundance. Converesely, in controlled markets (Socialist/Communist) it guarantys scarcity and shortages. Theoretically the only system that can work is Capitalism. Further proven by the fact we were all born Capitalists since it is out of Self Interest we took our first breath.
@waketheoblivious I agree that self interest helps determine supply and demand, but I disagree that self interest pitted against itself necessarily generates abundance. In reality, it depends on the self interests involved. If those parties involved are interested in world domination and the usurpation of people's civil rights, then its nice to have some rules in place. Competition must be regulated fairly. Baseball without rules is cheating, and so is Laissez-faire. It favors the rich.
Only way to prove wrong is if you can find a choice humans can make that is Not subject to self interest ie., do Not receive psychological or material benefit? The answer to Lord Am I my brothers keeper is in complete concert with Classical Economic Theory. Yes and No. By taking care of our own self interest and acting responsibly we in/directly help our brother. Plus, generate abundance at the lowest possible price distributed by an Invisible hand (Gods).
@waketheoblivious I'm certainly not opposed to healthy competition, but it has to be regulated fairly. We can't assume that everyone's self-interest is the same, or that it is always beneficial to the overall market. There are those in existence who would use the market to control every aspect of our lives if they could, and this is not beneficial to you or me. So there must be safeguards in place to prevent economic tyranny. We need a "level playing field", so to speak.
Those are Laws of Supply and Demand. Theoretically prove the only system that works is a Capitalist system. If can not be made to work in theory it won't work as applied theory either. Incidently, the only choice a human can make that refutes the principal of self-interest, ironicly supports the very same Principle it refuted. The knowledge gained from the first time the choice is made makes it subject to self interest the second time.
He speaks of Human capital. There are only two catagories in a Capitalistic system. The Owners of the Factors of Production & the Factors of Procuction. Bottom line, if own one share of stock, then are an owner of the factors of production. Human Capital is merely a Factor of Production, as is Plant and equipment. BrezNazi forgets that management, is a factor of production and considered human capital. How did a Satanic Nazi, get passed security oathed protect Constitution?
I doubt what I am going to say will come as a surprise to you, I offer it as a reminder. The shapeshifting serpent that hissssed the "you can be Godsssss" speech in the Garden, differs a great deal from what Jesus Christ presented, which was the Truth. He returned to Heaven to ask the Father to send His Holy Spirit, in His name, His gift to us! Him in us and He in the Father then we are of God. Jesus Christ makes us His equal, but not greater then, He who is in the
enslavement in to the beast system of Satan is what they desire.
TheOringinalBRad 4 months ago
Human Capital refers to the individual skill, knowledge, and talent possessed by each individual. All Brzezinski is saying is that Haiti has capital in the form of talented and knowledgable personal that can help revitalize the country if the right conditions and opportunities are established. Most probably UN support will be required to establish these favourable conditions.
westinpbnewman 1 year ago
@westinpbnewman "UN support will be required", first you preach the for the Lord then you say they need help from the beast system, you sound like a forked tounge serpent like the one you speak of. You cannot serve to masters, repent. Yeshua is Lord.
TheOringinalBRad 4 months ago
cont'd
He went on to say in that interview, "What is most important to the history of the world? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?" When the interviewer questioned him about Islamic fundamentalism representing a world menace, Brzezinski said, "Nonsense!"
toodance 2 years ago
It's an emerging menace, yes
Redcarpet01 2 years ago
wiki:
In 1998, Brzezinski was interviewed by the French newspaper Nouvel Observateur on the topic of Afghanistan. He revealed that CIA support for the mujaheddin had started before the 1979 Soviet invasion. Brzezinski saw the invasion as an opportunity to embroil the Soviet Union in a bloody conflict comparable to the US experience in Vietnam. He referred to this as the "Afghan Trap" and viewed the end of the Soviet empire as worth the cost of strengthening militant Islamic groups.
cont'd
toodance 2 years ago
control - kill - control - kill - control - kill - control - kill
hmmm, which one will we choose this week?
NZtrillion 2 years ago 4
I suspect 'they' are watching the people in Haiti right now to see how they are responding to the different situations i.e. no food, no shelter, grief, sink of death, hopelessness. At somepoint they will play the people into submission simply by observing.
The lack of effective international help is affecting them ORis it the effect of all that US military gumming up the works.
The only other thing I could add would be control with: fearterrorfearterrorfearterrorfearfearfearfearterror
motorolarules 2 years ago
Zbigniew Brzezinski is A hole.
ELIAXTRO 2 years ago 3
Thanks D! another great vid:) 5*
CosmicDramaQueen 2 years ago 2
Great video, the last statement is a rude reminder that the people may not be incharge.
motorolarules 2 years ago 4
I was using sarcasm to make a point
Temple420org 2 years ago 2
Ya,... after all I surely did not mention anything others couldn't see or hear themselves.
motorolarules 2 years ago
Bring back slavery would be good for the economy...ohh I mean we need to utilize human capital to the maximum benefit of the people.
Temple420org 2 years ago 7
Therefore, Zbigniew Brzezinski might just consider the loss of 100,000 lives in Haiti as an elimination of toxic investments. Since studying The Theory of Moral Sentiments, I have had issues with some of Adam Smith's concepts, particularly the "invisible hand," which remarkably resembles Luciferian doctrine.
00RoninSamurai00 2 years ago 6
@00RoninSamurai00
Absolute bullshit Ecn.101 If Adam Smith had chosen the term God versus use "invisible hand" we would all be asking who was Adam Smith. The Principle of Self interest helped determine the Laws of Supply & Demand. Natural Laws which like gravity can not be denied. Fact: Classic economic theory has proven self interest pitted against itself in a free market generates abundance. Conversely, that same self interest in Controlled Market economies guarantys scarcity and shortages.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Your right, what you espouse is standard programming in ECN 101. But, the term "Invisible Hand" of Lucifer, not God, fits in the doctrine more appropriately. It will take alot more than Smith, ECN 101 and your programmed response to convince me the greed of the ultra-rich is a benefit to humanity. Furthermore, you obviously fail to grasp the difference between a theory and what you refer to as a "natural law (i.e. "THEORY of Moral Sentiments).
00RoninSamurai00 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Some regulation of the market is necessary to ensure an ethical code of conduct. Otherwise, the "free market" will not remain free, and the corporate elite with "old money" will immediately stifle any competition, just as they have done already. The lack of proper regulation has led to corporate ownership of the govt, and now the intl. corporate elite makes the rules for their own benefit, to the detriment of any fair competition.
00RoninSamurai00 1 year ago
@00RoninSamurai00
The free market will remain free when people quit debating Democrat/Republican Liberal/Conservative and focus on corruption and deception. Satanists/Atheist have zero value to humanity and are the cause of all problems. Corruption is mental kryptonite. Simple enough every Politician and Public Official required to take a lie detector wired to an electric chair. Afraid to take the test, dont't run for office and work in the private industry. Homepage Digital Democracy.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I agree the heart of the problem is corruption and deception, I just think Smith's doctrine, like Brzezinski, is part of the problem. It is a distortion of the truth, and typical of Luciferian doctrine.
00RoninSamurai00 1 year ago
@00RoninSamurai00
Bingo! Exactly, Deception is the essence of Evil. The resulting corruption can not be ignored as the corrupt pigs change the rules to destroy the farm as they advance a Luciferian/Satanic/Atheist agenda for a one world dictator. Tis an honor to share the planet and defend God and Country with you RoninSamurai.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious Adam Smith himself was a Scottish noble and in his works regularly referred to the "Great Architect of the Universe" (Freemasonry's term for Lucifer as admitted by 33rd degree Freemasons Albert Pike and Manly P. Hall). He was therefore likely a Freemason (and perhaps Luciferian) himself. As an indoctrinated noble, he was protecting his own self-interests when he wrote his THEORY. You should bear in mind the ruling class determined what you learned in college.
00RoninSamurai00 1 year ago
@00RoninSamurai00
The Principle of Self Interest helped determine the Laws of Supply and Demand. Natural laws just like grafity, deny you still die. Self interest pitted against itself in a Free Market generates abundance. Converesely, in controlled markets (Socialist/Communist) it guarantys scarcity and shortages. Theoretically the only system that can work is Capitalism. Further proven by the fact we were all born Capitalists since it is out of Self Interest we took our first breath.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I agree that self interest helps determine supply and demand, but I disagree that self interest pitted against itself necessarily generates abundance. In reality, it depends on the self interests involved. If those parties involved are interested in world domination and the usurpation of people's civil rights, then its nice to have some rules in place. Competition must be regulated fairly. Baseball without rules is cheating, and so is Laissez-faire. It favors the rich.
00RoninSamurai00 1 year ago
@00RoninSamurai00
Only way to prove wrong is if you can find a choice humans can make that is Not subject to self interest ie., do Not receive psychological or material benefit? The answer to Lord Am I my brothers keeper is in complete concert with Classical Economic Theory. Yes and No. By taking care of our own self interest and acting responsibly we in/directly help our brother. Plus, generate abundance at the lowest possible price distributed by an Invisible hand (Gods).
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious I'm certainly not opposed to healthy competition, but it has to be regulated fairly. We can't assume that everyone's self-interest is the same, or that it is always beneficial to the overall market. There are those in existence who would use the market to control every aspect of our lives if they could, and this is not beneficial to you or me. So there must be safeguards in place to prevent economic tyranny. We need a "level playing field", so to speak.
00RoninSamurai00 1 year ago
@00RoninSamurai00
Those are Laws of Supply and Demand. Theoretically prove the only system that works is a Capitalist system. If can not be made to work in theory it won't work as applied theory either. Incidently, the only choice a human can make that refutes the principal of self-interest, ironicly supports the very same Principle it refuted. The knowledge gained from the first time the choice is made makes it subject to self interest the second time.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@00RoninSamurai00
He speaks of Human capital. There are only two catagories in a Capitalistic system. The Owners of the Factors of Production & the Factors of Procuction. Bottom line, if own one share of stock, then are an owner of the factors of production. Human Capital is merely a Factor of Production, as is Plant and equipment. BrezNazi forgets that management, is a factor of production and considered human capital. How did a Satanic Nazi, get passed security oathed protect Constitution?
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious That is an excellent question.
00RoninSamurai00 1 year ago
@00RoninSamurai00
I doubt what I am going to say will come as a surprise to you, I offer it as a reminder. The shapeshifting serpent that hissssed the "you can be Godsssss" speech in the Garden, differs a great deal from what Jesus Christ presented, which was the Truth. He returned to Heaven to ask the Father to send His Holy Spirit, in His name, His gift to us! Him in us and He in the Father then we are of God. Jesus Christ makes us His equal, but not greater then, He who is in the
Father
waketheoblivious 1 year ago