this is by far the best molecular biology video i have ever watched. I wish they just turn on this video instead of teaching in the molecular biology lecture.
the translator got it wrong. The central dogma is from 1958 not 1985. And in 1958, the code wasn't broken yet. So the transfer rna and messenger RNS were not even figured, only that there were intermediaries between dna and protein. Incredible feat. By 1970, more was know and the "dogma" was reiterated in its present form
Every organism- humans, plants, animals and etc. come from the same exact original cell. The theory was pronounced by Charles Darwin and accepted as a scientific document later on. Meaning..you have same DNA with every living thing in this world. The concept of karma yet solves another piece of a puzzle. Wishing others well, you get well. Wishing others evil, you get evil. What one critics in others, those are his precise flaws..How one sees the world, that is exactly how one sees himself..
A prion is a specific non-productive way of folding a protein that facilitates the process of other proteins to fold the same non-productive way, ie it is a self-replicating process.
Prions became famous because of the mad-cow disease, scrapies and creutzfeld-jacobs disease, since prions are the most likely cause of those diseases.
The central dogma of Cricks theory of the DNA double helix has been fatally challenged, yet the new discovery has not been publicized because science has been compromised by the politics of greed. Now mankind must deal with genetically modified foods that is already showing signs of catastrophic random altering of the DNA of all plant and animal life on the planet. Mankind needs to develop a bit of humility. Our leaders have gone mad and we admire them.
@psychosavant CLEARLY, I mean that the Crick gang has not acknowledge that the central dogma is flawed and it has not officially recognized that fact so, continues to promote the dogma as truth, Perry Mason.
You think the one way travel of information from DNA to protein is a lie based on a worldwide scientific conspiracy? It's not possible AT ALL that it's based on mountains of data and countless man hours worth of hard work and research from thousands of educated scientists.
But I still don't understand how Perry Mason is involved, and I'm still curious to know how you managed to learn about this new discovery that fatally challenges this theory. Can you present your case at least?
@psychosavant I was researching GM foods and it mentioned the central dogma and how erroneously it proved to be. The information is all over the internet and YouTube but it would take me too long to specifically name the items or videos. Do your own research, please. If you cannot make the tiny leap onto what I meant by calling you Perry Mason, I doubt you would understand any explanation I could make about my position re central dogma. People like you enfuriate me with your obfuscating doubts.
By the way, I've already found the portion of the article where central dogma is mentioned, and the writer of this particular one got the definition of central dogma incorrect and it defeats the idea of contradicting the principle. If this is the general consensus of your ideas, I encourage you to make additional efforts into finding out how accurate the information in these articles actually are. Either way, I will continue looking into it.
@psychosavant The thing Crick didn't count on was that the DNA doesn't always only replicate itself predictably, but it replicates whatever cell it penetrates....this is as close to my concern as I can explain. I am not trained in this field enough to recognize whether the central dogma was understood correctly by the writer of the item you read or whether his error defeats the idea. I appreciate your zeal in getting to the bottom of the issue.I will review my own documents and continue to seek
@olga2415 "The thing Crick didn't count on was that the DNA doesn't always only replicate itself predictably, but it replicates whatever cell it penetrates..."
@YurNotSpecial I mean, that Crick discovered a definite indeterminism in the way the DNA replicates. The closest anyone can get to predictibility of anything on the subatomic level is probabality, not certainty. There will never be a mathematical formula for everything that is seen to have happened, is what his discovery unearthed because there is too much that is unpredictable. Creativity is not something that can be quanticised. Is this the way you understand it also?
@YurNotSpecial If I understood it better, I'd be able to be clearer about my statements. lol I am struggling to understand the conflict between Crick and some of his critics. It seems important to some who write their papers. I tried to find the hard copy I have of a site on the issue and tore up my computer room files and cannot put my hand on it. I know I have it somewhere. It was an article regarding HIV/AIDs issue and they harked back to Crick's DN A "flawed" replication dogma.
@olga2415 Kinda hard to agree or disagree when no argument has been put forward; although, this statement is a bit telling: "It was an article regarding HIV/AIDs issue and they harked back to Crick's DN A "flawed" replication dogma."
Please bear in mind the central dogma pertains to information flow in a cell, not replication.
@YurNotSpecial before a cell can replicate there must be information flow; right? I am not a trained physicist and am not looking to be agreed or disagreed with. I am trying to understand this issue of why I am reading so many articles criticizing Crick's explanation of DNA re not only replication re HIV/ AIDs, but genetically modified foods issue. It is complicated to the point that not even physicists agree; why would I deign to look for an agreement or disagreement here on the comments site?
Actually, saying recent discovery is far more vague than mentioning GM Foods. Thanks for taking the time to at least mention it. Since you finally did, I was able to look it up. I'm guessing you presumably thought I was psychic. So given this new information, i'll look into it further.
But seriously, it would take you too long to list your sources? Try this: gmfreecymru d o t org
@psychosavant I do not have the obvious need you display to one-up anyone to prove how intelligent I am. Have a good time with your research. I use a wide range of sources, tending to eschew official sources; which I do not trust.
This isn't a question of proving how intelligent any of us are, but rather coming down to knowing what the truth is. I'm personally not okay with people wandering around with false information, or even worse, spreading false information. I'm positive you feel the same way or you wouldn't have made your posts in the first place. At any rate, I'll sift through as much stuff I can, and see if I can get to the bottom of this. If there is substance to your arguments, I will find it.
This is wonderful. I am now taking Freshmen Biology and this also helped me wayyyy better than the instructor. I have 5 pages of notes and still didn't understand it, but now it is crystal clear. Visual learning is my forte. Thank you again!!
This was terrible I thought, and I'm not being raciest. I just though he didn't go in depth with particularly any of the enzymes or specific tRNA molecules. Hands down the worst explanation I've seen.
this is the best desciption ever!!1 :) what is the official name of this video so I can download it in HD quality? maybe some 720p torrent ? or Rapid share? Good Job
This is super awesome. Helped me understand way better than my professor explained it and SI Instructor. Very simple and accurate and wonderful animation that captured the processes in fine detail. This is why I love the Japanese.
It would be nice to have a hierarchy of interlinked videos to allow viewers to zoom into the many different processes involved in great detail. Perhaps even down to the level where only a single active site is shown and some sense of the many hundreds to thousands of wrong or misaligned molecules that bounce in and out before the correct one creates a reaction is depicted. Perhaps something like the encyclopedia of life, but for just for the various nanobots that inhabit our cells.
very good, really liked it
xenabss 3 weeks ago
THE ONLY DOGMA I BELIEVE IS IN CENTRAL DOGMA! :D
dapiridoob 1 month ago
this is by far the best molecular biology video i have ever watched. I wish they just turn on this video instead of teaching in the molecular biology lecture.
hongmancho10 2 months ago
Comment removed
hongmancho10 2 months ago
the translator got it wrong. The central dogma is from 1958 not 1985. And in 1958, the code wasn't broken yet. So the transfer rna and messenger RNS were not even figured, only that there were intermediaries between dna and protein. Incredible feat. By 1970, more was know and the "dogma" was reiterated in its present form
jrlmenezes1 4 months ago
@jrlmenezes1
hahaOSAMAhaha 4 months ago
Why does Japanese make things sound so much simpler? Yay for this video
Cannibalope 10 months ago 2
yes, if you want a reference I recommend the cell for further info on intracellular mechanisms I recommend Molecular Biology of the Cell.
dumtadum 10 months ago
@dumtadum I would recommend looking into it! Specifically regarding this statement: "tRNA is a protein..."
YurNotSpecial 10 months ago
oh, good, and asian person. Now I can't fail my biology final!
Stupidespeon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Every organism- humans, plants, animals and etc. come from the same exact original cell. The theory was pronounced by Charles Darwin and accepted as a scientific document later on. Meaning..you have same DNA with every living thing in this world. The concept of karma yet solves another piece of a puzzle. Wishing others well, you get well. Wishing others evil, you get evil. What one critics in others, those are his precise flaws..How one sees the world, that is exactly how one sees himself..
RUSSKAYAG 1 year ago
A prion is a specific non-productive way of folding a protein that facilitates the process of other proteins to fold the same non-productive way, ie it is a self-replicating process.
Prions became famous because of the mad-cow disease, scrapies and creutzfeld-jacobs disease, since prions are the most likely cause of those diseases.
dumtadum 1 year ago
A 13 week class condensed into and 8 minute video...
bluejello007 1 year ago
I hate to ask, but am I the only one to get the Evangelion reference?
kendonator1 1 year ago
Such a great review for my exam tomorrow! Glad I found this :)
misshayleygirl 1 year ago
The central dogma of Cricks theory of the DNA double helix has been fatally challenged, yet the new discovery has not been publicized because science has been compromised by the politics of greed. Now mankind must deal with genetically modified foods that is already showing signs of catastrophic random altering of the DNA of all plant and animal life on the planet. Mankind needs to develop a bit of humility. Our leaders have gone mad and we admire them.
olga2415 1 year ago
@olga2415
Hold on.. if it's not been publicized, how do you know about it?
psychosavant 1 year ago
@psychosavant CLEARLY, I mean that the Crick gang has not acknowledge that the central dogma is flawed and it has not officially recognized that fact so, continues to promote the dogma as truth, Perry Mason.
olga2415 1 year ago
@olga2415
You think the one way travel of information from DNA to protein is a lie based on a worldwide scientific conspiracy? It's not possible AT ALL that it's based on mountains of data and countless man hours worth of hard work and research from thousands of educated scientists.
But I still don't understand how Perry Mason is involved, and I'm still curious to know how you managed to learn about this new discovery that fatally challenges this theory. Can you present your case at least?
psychosavant 1 year ago
@psychosavant I was researching GM foods and it mentioned the central dogma and how erroneously it proved to be. The information is all over the internet and YouTube but it would take me too long to specifically name the items or videos. Do your own research, please. If you cannot make the tiny leap onto what I meant by calling you Perry Mason, I doubt you would understand any explanation I could make about my position re central dogma. People like you enfuriate me with your obfuscating doubts.
olga2415 1 year ago
@olga2415
By the way, I've already found the portion of the article where central dogma is mentioned, and the writer of this particular one got the definition of central dogma incorrect and it defeats the idea of contradicting the principle. If this is the general consensus of your ideas, I encourage you to make additional efforts into finding out how accurate the information in these articles actually are. Either way, I will continue looking into it.
psychosavant 1 year ago
@psychosavant The thing Crick didn't count on was that the DNA doesn't always only replicate itself predictably, but it replicates whatever cell it penetrates....this is as close to my concern as I can explain. I am not trained in this field enough to recognize whether the central dogma was understood correctly by the writer of the item you read or whether his error defeats the idea. I appreciate your zeal in getting to the bottom of the issue.I will review my own documents and continue to seek
olga2415 1 year ago
@olga2415 "The thing Crick didn't count on was that the DNA doesn't always only replicate itself predictably, but it replicates whatever cell it penetrates..."
What do you mean by this statement?
YurNotSpecial 10 months ago
@YurNotSpecial I mean, that Crick discovered a definite indeterminism in the way the DNA replicates. The closest anyone can get to predictibility of anything on the subatomic level is probabality, not certainty. There will never be a mathematical formula for everything that is seen to have happened, is what his discovery unearthed because there is too much that is unpredictable. Creativity is not something that can be quanticised. Is this the way you understand it also?
olga2415 10 months ago
@olga2415 What are talking about? There's a lot of ambiguity and generalizations in your comments, please be specific.
I was hoping you could clarify this statement more: "... but it replicates whatever cell it penetrates..."
YurNotSpecial 10 months ago
@YurNotSpecial If I understood it better, I'd be able to be clearer about my statements. lol I am struggling to understand the conflict between Crick and some of his critics. It seems important to some who write their papers. I tried to find the hard copy I have of a site on the issue and tore up my computer room files and cannot put my hand on it. I know I have it somewhere. It was an article regarding HIV/AIDs issue and they harked back to Crick's DN A "flawed" replication dogma.
olga2415 10 months ago
@olga2415 Kinda hard to agree or disagree when no argument has been put forward; although, this statement is a bit telling: "It was an article regarding HIV/AIDs issue and they harked back to Crick's DN A "flawed" replication dogma."
Please bear in mind the central dogma pertains to information flow in a cell, not replication.
YurNotSpecial 10 months ago
@YurNotSpecial before a cell can replicate there must be information flow; right? I am not a trained physicist and am not looking to be agreed or disagreed with. I am trying to understand this issue of why I am reading so many articles criticizing Crick's explanation of DNA re not only replication re HIV/ AIDs, but genetically modified foods issue. It is complicated to the point that not even physicists agree; why would I deign to look for an agreement or disagreement here on the comments site?
olga2415 10 months ago
@YurNotSpecial Yet, Crick did not reveal this aspect of his discovery....that was left for his critics to publicize.
olga2415 10 months ago
@olga2415
Actually, saying recent discovery is far more vague than mentioning GM Foods. Thanks for taking the time to at least mention it. Since you finally did, I was able to look it up. I'm guessing you presumably thought I was psychic. So given this new information, i'll look into it further.
But seriously, it would take you too long to list your sources? Try this: gmfreecymru d o t org
See how easy that was?
psychosavant 1 year ago
@psychosavant I do not have the obvious need you display to one-up anyone to prove how intelligent I am. Have a good time with your research. I use a wide range of sources, tending to eschew official sources; which I do not trust.
olga2415 1 year ago
@olga2415
This isn't a question of proving how intelligent any of us are, but rather coming down to knowing what the truth is. I'm personally not okay with people wandering around with false information, or even worse, spreading false information. I'm positive you feel the same way or you wouldn't have made your posts in the first place. At any rate, I'll sift through as much stuff I can, and see if I can get to the bottom of this. If there is substance to your arguments, I will find it.
psychosavant 1 year ago
Anyone know what a prion is?
olga2415 1 year ago
I got 300 XP points playing this game! Using this Move. I love Final Fantasy... wait
davidkeys100 1 year ago
I got 300 XP points playing this game! Using this Move. I love Final Fantasy... wait
davidkeys100 1 year ago
@asddge isn't it Japanese?
missypunkrocker 1 year ago
exellent j'en suis pantoise.
Un grand merci jolie voix
rifliflih 1 year ago
Addresses all the right questions....epic
MrWaffleman098 1 year ago
Excellent. My lazy biolgy teacher should watch this. Good work.
steppinithotter 1 year ago
i just saved myself 6 years of college with this 8min video.
manualLaborer 1 year ago
did anyone else thought of evangelion?
Mefis2feles 1 year ago
This is wonderful. I am now taking Freshmen Biology and this also helped me wayyyy better than the instructor. I have 5 pages of notes and still didn't understand it, but now it is crystal clear. Visual learning is my forte. Thank you again!!
WaterBearer2008 1 year ago
yeah, maybe its such a brief explaination, but it does help for further understandings.
arigatou gozaimasu!
nilahable 1 year ago
How is tRNA made?
mdoerkse 1 year ago
@mdoerkse tRNA is a protein and made like any other protein. An organism's first tRNA is inherited from its mother.
dumtadum 1 year ago
@dumtadum "tRNA is a protein and made like any other protein."
Are you sure about that?
YurNotSpecial 10 months ago
すばらしい 感動的な まとめです!
天才!
fkurbanov 1 year ago
ชอบค่ะ แต่ฟังไม่ออก อิอิ
ThePhakarat 1 year ago
This was terrible I thought, and I'm not being raciest. I just though he didn't go in depth with particularly any of the enzymes or specific tRNA molecules. Hands down the worst explanation I've seen.
Aire26 1 year ago
@
obvious troll is obvious
FissionNonStop 1 year ago
ありがとう!
pinkpendant 1 year ago
very precise xplanation, love it............
dolly224 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
この ビデオは おもしろくて、 よかったです。ありがとうございます。
So interesting, and well presented... excellent! thank you very much! :)
MELODY7809 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
この ビデオは おもしろくて、 よかったです。ありがとうございます。
So interesting, and well presented... excellent! thank you very much! :)
MELODY7809 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
この ビデオは おもしろくて、 よかったです。ありがとうございます。
So interesting, and well presented... excellent! thank you very much! :)
MELODY7809 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
この ビデオは おもしろくて、 よかったです。ありがとうございます。
So interesting, and well presented... excellent! thank you very much! :)
MELODY7809 1 year ago
この ビデオは おもしろくて、 よかったです。ありがとうございます。
So interesting, and well presented... excellent! thank you very much! :)
MELODY7809 1 year ago
Very good animation and explanation!
harajukulovergirl 1 year ago
thank you for this super version of DNA synthesis! It's the best I've seen so far! Thanks for the translation!
carrishayn 1 year ago
so the whole process we just viewed is seen as an old concept? D: or what? confuzzled.
awesome animation. i LUV japanese
SatoTM3 1 year ago
Wouaaaaah bravo magnifique!
Merci
rifliflih 1 year ago
Great vid. Thanks
rfa123c 1 year ago
Japan!
Lima547 1 year ago
i wish all lectures were this good!!
salemaw 1 year ago
Really fantastic..Pls promote videos like where students can understand very easily than reading text books.
nsubashcbose 1 year ago 2
Was very informative. Covered the topic very well.
madmercenary2 1 year ago
I'm so afraid of my molecular bio exam..........
barrooooz 1 year ago
@barrooooz, how did you do?
spiryt03 1 year ago
domo arigato gozaimasu! ^____^
RobotBadger 1 year ago
ATCGATCGATCGGATGCTATGCTATAGCCATTA 3:32 right?
MrProper2009 1 year ago
this is a great video ^^ thanks
goumjandi 1 year ago
this is the best desciption ever!!1 :) what is the official name of this video so I can download it in HD quality? maybe some 720p torrent ? or Rapid share? Good Job
illraveu 1 year ago
close enough
lactatingwalrus 1 year ago
This was really great. Thank you!
jaymadison1309 1 year ago
life's amazing and beautiful. i love how everything is so accurate.
cherryquf 2 years ago
Super video!!! Hard to believe:)
coolguy0529 2 years ago
1:48 Just like some creepers?
Ryukazaki 2 years ago
This is super awesome. Helped me understand way better than my professor explained it and SI Instructor. Very simple and accurate and wonderful animation that captured the processes in fine detail. This is why I love the Japanese.
cjlouis1029 2 years ago 30
Don't be so hard on your professor. You probably just understood it this time because of the visual aid
7410n0 2 years ago 4
@cjlouis1029 Admittedly my beliefs exactly as why they are more advanced.
Underfaith 1 year ago
It would be nice to have a hierarchy of interlinked videos to allow viewers to zoom into the many different processes involved in great detail. Perhaps even down to the level where only a single active site is shown and some sense of the many hundreds to thousands of wrong or misaligned molecules that bounce in and out before the correct one creates a reaction is depicted. Perhaps something like the encyclopedia of life, but for just for the various nanobots that inhabit our cells.
ananiasacts 2 years ago 2
simply wonderful :)
1derfulymade 2 years ago 2
excellent. i love the "natural" explanation of things, such as giving an idea of how fast the RNA polymerase process works
Techra 2 years ago 17
@Techra yeah, definitely loved the time reference.
spiryt03 1 year ago
that helped me so much for my quiz tomorrow :D
ambiemouse 2 years ago
lol me tooooooooooooooooo
xMiro7x 2 years ago
very interesting to undeerstand DNA functions
betomondra 2 years ago
Great video. Japanese narration makes it more majestic. :]
TsimNujHawj 3 years ago
great video & translation.
durstwurst 3 years ago
this really helped me..cheers!
Essincy 3 years ago
よかった。
alheadbme 3 years ago
Those are pretty pictures...
Shaun32887 3 years ago
Wow!
dfernan 3 years ago 3
AMAZING.
Just amazing.
spyxter 3 years ago 3
this was really helpful
thank u so much for uploading this.
bluedrangon69 3 years ago 2
Fantastic. Thanks a lot!
neithere 3 years ago 2
detailed....
Imbacrap 3 years ago 2
nce!!! it is so detailed.........ü
mercychen 4 years ago 2
wow, great video
explains all the concepts with really explainatory images
2soos2 4 years ago 2