Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (178)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • all of the comments are about either sex or terrorism, what the hell :P

  • I wonder the 4 "don't like" what do they have instead of ears....

  • All I can say is what an incredible piece of music ! Why you are all arguing about sex etc god only knows, pin back your ears and listen !

  • @thegoodgeneral thanks so much for uploading this. Its my favorite recording. And by the way I'm a high schooler and I want to be a film maker when I'm older. I'm writing a script and I'm wondering if I can include a variation on your Daphnis et Chloe/porno shit comment? Its fucking brilliant!

  • @tatertots725 Go for it as long as you credit me in the beginning, half-way through, 3/4ths of the way through, 7/9ths of the way through, at the end, in an after-credits epilogue, and send 100% of the proceedings my way.

  • @thegoodgeneral will do kiddo

  • This is my very favorite performance of this piece.

  • @LittleCatBead yeah I wish I could've seen this live.

  • Stop with the bickering children let me enjoy my music!!!!!!

  • I must say, I usually think the up-loaders of classical music are snobs, but you are FUCKING HILARIOUS! :D

  • THIS SONG IS SEX FOR MY EARS. And that aint no sin.

  • @MrNbkelly Perhaps not, but using your grammar should be. "And that is not a sin".

  • It's all part of the continuing decay of the average human attention span, I think. Centuries ago folks were more than happy to sit and listen to entire symphonies and oratorios, or read enormous books. Now, people can't even pay attention past the first few bars of Beethoven's Fifth, and they still fancy themselves classical music fans. TV commercials have certainly contributed to this sad trend. But I can stomach the ones that leave the original composition alone, at least. But not this.

  • @Bingo1059 Ravel was not noted to be a sexual man. In fact his romantic affiliations were not only not recorded, they were not witnessed. But more than sex he was not religious and cared nothing for what others called "sins."

    Sex is beautiful, passionate; sometimes primal, sometimes calm. No wonder the comparison to music.

  • @thegoodgeneral The only reason one should commit the act is to conceive children, after marriage. Than it can be a beautiful thing. I said sometimes sinful, however sadly it is abused far too much in modern society. They kill their children and use contraception. It's not just "For the fun of it', it should have a much deeper meaning. Even you must admit it's abused, to some degree at least, just like almost any good thing. I knew Ravel wasn't religious, it's always something that saddened me.

  • @Bingo1059 You're a disgusting slimeball. You are being an unrealistic, hateful shit stain who can't enjoy life. Take your moronic scumbag religion and shove it. We don't need your woman-hating genital-based morality. It's done more to destroy society than any other stupid delusion.

    Fuck off.

  • @Aquaria Really? You open with calling me a "slimeball' when in your next breath you call me a "hateful shit", that's not at ALL being a hypocrite. How am I hateful? How do I hate woman? And like fu*king like rabits is EXCELLENT for society. So are drugs, murder, rape, and any other vice. Your being vague, pulling harsh conclusions out of thin air, even flat out lies, all to support your rationality. Isn't that sad?

  • @thegoodgeneral Knowing Ravel's temperment it's safe to say he wouldn't exactly frown upon the comparison, but rather he was so dedicated to his music he felt he had no time to love anything else. And it shows.

  • @Bingo1059 Oh by the way check out "Daphnis et Chloe," which is the story of two pornstars with enormous genitalia that fucked all the Goddamned time before Chloe got stole'd from pirates who raped her and then giant-dicked Daphnis came on their faces and saved Chloe the end

  • @thegoodgeneral I'm not quite certain why you are telling me about your porn collection? This is exactly what I mean about the abuse of sex. It gets dragged into everything. I thought you had some class, instead you tell me, a complete stranger, about your porn collection. Everyone always makes everything about sex, when it should be a private and humble moment between husband and wife.

  • @Bingo1059 If you had some class you would've known that "Daphnis et Chloe" is a ballet scored by Ravel about two young lovers.

  • @thegoodgeneral Don't flatter yourself, I was being sarcastic.

  • @Bingo1059 Just stop it man. Enjoy the music. thegoodgeneral destroyed you, the war we are currently fighting is bullshit and an atrocity, and you're too preachy.

    To each his own.

  • @tatertots725

    1. I only reply to comments because their nothing short of funny.

    2. I hardly see how the goodgeneral "Destroyed" me. Hes debate was probably the weakest.

  • @thegoodgeneral You are sick!

  • @Bingo1059

    Why is sex necessarily sinful? Why is sex not necessarily beautiful? You're begging the question, dear friend. I think sex would be an adequate metaphor, as both are considered among the height of human pleasure.

  • @azazeal905 I said sometimes sinful. As said in another reply, it's abused far too often. It should be a moment between a husband and wife to conceive children. Instead they kill the children and use contraceptives. Even you must admit it is abused,There are children who are kidnapped and locked to basements for sex in exchange for meth, of course this is a very extreme case, it's fact that it's abused in the most disgusting of ways and without any moral line there are no boundaries for abuse.

  • @Bingo1059 Oh shut up you uptight stupid prude and woman-hating, homophobic religitard piece of shit. Sex doesn't have to be between a husband and wife. What about a man and man? A woman and woman?

    And thank goodness for contraceptives. It prevents more scumbags like you from being vomited into culture and society. You are bringing bullshit into a discussion about Ravel that doesn't belong in it. You're a tedious, pompous, stupid bore of a prude.

    Sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up, bigot.

  • @Aquaria How do I hate woman? Your not making any sense. Homophobic insinuites being "Scared" of them, but I'm not scared of them, nor do I hate them. I could care less what they do. I have many lesbian friends, and many gay friends (For as homophobic and woman hating as I am), you pretend to know me and what I believe but you know nothing. You called me a bigot when you obviously HATE catholics to their core, how is that not bigotry? You are a very sad hypocrite, and, I will pray for you.

  • @Aquaria Further more your saying I'm bringing thing's into a song that "don't belong", for one I didn't start randomly posting "I'm a mormon". I didn't even say I believe in God. I said that it's sad that sex has to be randomly pulled into this song.

  • @Bingo1059

    But this doesn't actually adress what I said. The same could be said of many human activities. What you are referring to only involves general human depravity- it doesn't attack any inherent issues with sex or pleasure.

    For instance, Religion is often used as a justification for war, murder, and atrocity. Does this make religion itself bad?

  • @azazeal905 Sex itself isn't bad, I even said that. I said it's abuse is bad. So the question you pose is therefore invalid. You can even check back in the comments.

    The only religion in modern days that uses itself as justification for war is Islam, which is bad. I'm Catholic, and, at least for a LONG time, war must first be justified for religion, not the other way around.

  • @Bingo1059

    My question is not invalid. Your original problem was that somebody compared this song's beauty to sex. You, then focus on supposed "abuse". It's absolute nonsense, you are viewing the world through a rather biased and prudish window.

  • @azazeal905 Wow... You're slow. Your question IS invalid, let me brake this down for you. You said: "Why is sex necessarily sinful?", THAT WAS INVALID IN THE FIRST PLACE because I said it "Can be beautiful". It would be a lie to say ANYTHING is absolutely beautiful. I pointed out it's major flaw, which is disgusting abuse. The order in which we meet people has changed. it used to be:

    1. Meet. 2. Marriage. 3. Sex

    Now its

    1. Sex. 2. Possibly date. 3. Marriage.

    Thats simply wrong.

  • @Bingo1059 you sound like a complete whackjob

  • Oh, and fun fact, there have been more terrorist attacks on U.S. soil from Christian extremist groups than Muslim ones in the last ten years. There are also no actual wars being declared/justified by Islam right now, whereas I don't know how many times I have heard people I know of various faiths (Catholic, Protestant, Hindu, and Jewish to be specific) use their religious beliefs in an attempt to justify the wars the United States has, and is currently participating in.

  • @azazeal905 1. Those statistics are TOTALLY arbitrary, I agree, there are TONS of whack jobs who call them selves Christains, and are our total enemy's, but there are just under 1 billion muslims who would love nothing more than this country dead (Thats 1/6th of worldy population). And, any Catholic who uses their faith to justify war is not Catholic, Look up the Just War Doctrine. In order for a war to be "okay" in the Catholic world, it has to pass 4 rules, one of which ensures humanity.

  • @azazeal905 This is the Just War doctrine:

    1.the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be lasting, grave, and certain;

    2.all other means of putting an end to it must have been shown to be impractical or ineffective;

    3.there must be serious prospects of success;

    4.the use of arms must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated. The power of modern means of destruction weighs very heavily in evaluating this condition.

  • my favorite part is 3:45!!

  • thanks for good information!

  • The Cellist's hair made made more noise than he did!

  • I can't not move when those strings come in at the beginning ORGASM

  • I really hope for them that the 2 "dislikes" are def

  • @composer2510 Aww, I wouldn't wish deafness on anyone....

  • Who needs sex when you can just listen to Ravel?

  • SKIP TO 0:13 !!!

  • I kinda wanna play this quartet now...

  • violist had an orgasm at 1:24

  • @jfs50 So do I. Every single time.

  • its the proof of playing full of passion!

  • I really love this movement!

    My favorite! [ :

  • Such a wonderful and illuminating music.

  • Anyone besides me think that Ancestry.com sucks for desecrating this masterpiece?

  • @ifutureman It's sad that they had to take a beautiful thing and, in my harsh opinion, rape it. Society does that. We get something good or beautiful finally and we just run with it. Beautiful things are becoming more scarce. Far more scarce. I think Maurice Ravel was the last of any composer that wrote anything of any notability. Ravel's music is beautiful, it captures a spirit that no other artist I know possibly has. It captures France and all it's glory in one song. Impossibly beautiful.

  • Thanks to Wes Anderson for including this in "The Royal Tenenbaums"!

  • I have a cd of this but its slightly a little more faster

  • Its a shame he only wrote one, but its also convenient to just be able to say "the ravel string quartet"

  • Any chance of this being uploaded in HQ? :)

  • @FISHFACEmatt I've thought about it, I do own the DVD. But the audio quality is pretty good as is on here, maybe those who want better should consider making a purchase.

  • @thegoodgeneral Cool! I may well just do that! :P

  • @thegoodgeneral Your first sentence is a comma splice. A semicolon would more properly structure your thought. Nevertheless, I have read your video info and greatly admire the fluency of your writing.

  • love love love... such a pretty piece :)

  • This is absolutely glorious.

  • Orthough the orchestra members of this are, well, very expressive. At 3:12 she looks like she's going to cry..... very strange faces.... Would be much more entertaining without that....

  • @Bingo1059 maybe, 'orthough' it's not that big a deal in my opinion

  • @tyu3456 "orthough" you don't have to get so defensive... A lot of "dorky" musicians do it. I had one member in my orchestra just go crazy (Looked like he was doing something inapropriate with his cello...), it's just how they are. I suppose at least if they are going to be so arrogant they have at least earned it. I love this piece.

  • Love this song, it's lively and has some very beautiful melodies! It reminds me of traveling through Italy and France for some reason, I must of heard this song while I was there and subconsciously think of it now.

  • Comment removed

  • i can't see any microphones. Thee must be a pair of TLM-50's above the stage, out of shot.

  • Why wasn't this on the boogie nights soundtrack, w Mark Walberg pluckin' dem strings?

  • Haha. I was just thinking about how this could go in a movie and boom, it's another one from the Royal Tenebaums.

    Three pieces of music from that movie I've listen to independently without seeing it:

    This, that Eric Satie piece and Needle in the Hay by Elliott Smith. I resonate with the musical taste of the people in that movie.

  • TRÈS TRÈS VIF!!!!!! C'est très lent!!!! Quickly plz!!!!!

  • @DZAUDZI69 It's "assez vif," not "tres vif."

  • @thegoodgeneral Assez vif is ''Allegro assai'' (quickly enough). Très vif is ''Allegro molto'' (very quickly).

  • @DZAUDZI69 Assez is "rather," compared to "assai" which is "very." "Vif" means lively, whereas "allegro" specifically dictates a speed. Had Ravel meant "allegro assai," he would've written "allegro assai" at the top.

  • @thegoodgeneral Anyway, the music is very slow. :< The Royal Tenenbaums play it better.

  • all this testy exchange about hidden mikes insinuates that without technology Ravel would sound awful. Grow up.

  • @MrAkihiros Without good technology, all recordings of any music will always, no doubt, sound awful. Have some respect for sound engineers, fuckface; they're hugely responsible for 99% of the music you enjoy listening to.

  • @thegoodgeneral No need to be offensive. I'm all for technology, in fact I was on your side against the other poster. I really do appreciate your efforts for this post so relax and peace, ok?

  • @thegoodgeneral Anyway, this isn't the spirit of Ravel.

  • @DZAUDZI69 At least 335 people disagree with you.

  • @thegoodgeneral 335 doesn't know Ravel.

  • @DZAUDZI69 I've listened to the recording to reference. The speed isn't that much different; in fact, the difference lies in The Hagen Quartet having more dynamics in their interpretation, slowing down and speeding up, whereas the Ysaÿe Quartet (the performers of the recording you prefer) play it fairly static. Overall, I found their interpretation to be riddled with problems, the most noticeable of which is tuning issues. (Continued in following comment....)

  • @DZAUDZI69 To close, no one's going to stop you from having a preference. But please don't say that those who like Hagen's performance "doesn't" know Ravel's music, especially when you refer to your preference as performed by "The Royal Tenenbaums," a movie title, whose soundtrack, by the way, excludes the 3 other movements of this piece. If that's not being in the dark, I don't know what is.

  • @DZAUDZI69 I wouldn't say that. I think it sounds just like him.

  • Does anyone else think this sounds very folky at times?

  • @Symmetryful Yeah, for sure! Or something like that, anyway. Ravel boggles my mind...

  • @Symmetryful come to think of it the theme does sound rather folksy. But i don't think that's a bad thing though. Stravinsky, for example, is very folksy.

  • Wow! I've searched for this remarkable song for years! Amazing!

  • Wht beautiful skill and the video has so much clarity that it's better than being in the back of the hall. Do you notice one of the men broke his string.

  • @Grendelmonster8u The e-string is thin enough to sometimes appear missing, but nowhere in this video does a string break.

  • @thegoodgeneral From 06:06 to 06:12 there is a string hanging...not that it matters happens often from vigorous playing.

  • @Grendelmonster8u Oh, you mean a hair. Horsehair from the bow.

  • This reminds me of Ratatouille...

  • I fell in love with this song I play in orchestra so I am musically satisfied and I couldn't stop dancing to it. I can't escape from the beauty of it. Sounds like a fantastic dream

  • fantastic recording!

  • Found out about this composer via this song on the royal royal tenenbaums soundtrack.

  • this is absolutely amazing.

  • Astoundingly gorgeous!

  • No dislikes??/ Way to goo!!!! YEah!:D

  • It's amazing how just four intstramentalists can sound like a whole orchestra

  • wonderful interpretation of a wonderful piece of music

    Ravel did so much more than the Bolero

  • i think this saved me from my ED

  • @fatqwert200 Hahahaha.

  • were their instruments mic'd? they sound very bright

  • @ihosvany I don't think so. You see microphones hanging from the ceiling; no cables from their instruments. But I guess it's possible that they have wireless microphones inside their instruments.

  • @thegoodgeneral They have to be mic'd, otherwise you wouldn't hear the same sound quality at each camera angle.

    

  • @terminatormunky Professional cameras don't have microphones on them. Ihosnavy was asking if they had microphones placed in them instead of ambient microphones, which you can see hanging off the ceiling. "otherwise you wouldn't hear the same sound quality at each camera angle." Why would anyone ever assume this?

  • @thegoodgeneral No, no I never said there were mics on the cameras. I said that the instruments are mic'd, otherwise the audio of the video wouldn't be the same in every area. I assumed it because it's true XD. And yes, they are hanging ambient mics.

  • @terminatormunky What does the camera angle have to do with the microphone-placement and mixing?

  • @thegoodgeneral Ahh, well the person you were talking to assumed that there were no mics, I was more responding to them. Carry on! No harm meant. You do argue a bit with your viewers don't you XD.

  • @terminatormunky They asked if the instruments were mic'ed from the inside rather than using ambient microphones. I don't see how anyone hearing this music could assume no microphones were involved, lest they believe in magic.

  • @thegoodgeneral Ahh guess I misunderstood their comment. And yes, that's what made me laugh, it would be impossible. But so you know, the Hagen Quartet sounds this good without mics! I heard them in Austria.

  • @thegoodgeneral I Private Messaged you, btw.

  • This is music as it should be presented, beautiful photography, crisp and clear sound I could watch and listen to this for years and never tire of this group.I year to hear more of their love for playing. A perfect ten would not be enough, perfection is when musicians go

    beyond their ego and play like Gods. Thank you all.

  • This is music as it should be presented, beautiful photography, crisp and clear sound I could watch and listen to this for years and never tire of this group.I year to hear more of their love for playing. A perfect ten would not be enough, perfection is when musicians go

    beyond their ego and play like Gods.

  • One of my all time favorite works, truly inspirational.

    By the by...

    Not until listening to these guys did I hear Camille Saint-Saëns in the piece.... but can we get a holler at 4:01 for the coda of 'Danse Macabre'?

  • the way mark wahlberg and hillary clinton interact in this is a wonderful thing

  • @calebpaxton lollllllllllll

  • Love this music. To play it.. listen to it :)

  • Absolutely amazing. It sounds so contemporary to me, like it was composed yesterday.

  • @Papapaprice- it's okay, it looks like Donnie Wahlberg is playing cello.

    Jokes aside, this is amazing, and any chamber musician would do well to study these folks.

  • awesome

  • La Gloria.

  • Great performance!

  • The Hagen Quartet, featuring Mark Wahlberg on first violin.

  • @papapaprice Strangeass comparison.

  • @papapaprice: Unlike! Ha! This player emotes more in his pinky finger more than MW has in his entire career... and he's still dreamy hot... That's so cool...

  • @babyfreshpony Haha. I just think he looks alot like him is all.

  • @papapaprice I was thinking that too! I wonder if he also has a third nipple? ;)

  • @papapaprice I guess you meant Matt Damon.

  • @papapaprice You forgot Judd Apatow on 2nd, Hillary Clinton on Viola...anddd the Cellist as himself 

  • @crazyequalsfun Ugh, I used to consider the violist attractive. Thanks a lot.

  • @papapaprice And Matthew Broderick at cello

  • 2:47 I love those harmonies

  • this is one of the most beautiful renditions of this piece that i have ever heard. this is one of my favorite songs!! thank you for the amazing performance :)

  • wow I really love this

  • This became my favourite piece after hearing the Medici String Quartet play it at Kingston University. It is utterly luscious and summer-like!

  • WOW

  • This is so incredibly amazing! Thank you!

  • the second violinist looks like manuel from fawlty towers :P

    this interpretation is sound and results in a WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW effect

  • @l0veartist The right performers make all the difference.

  • This quartet is amazing. :)

  • 這畫質也太好了吧!  HQ . 讚!

  • @s931722 謝謝!

  • Ravel only wrote 1 string qurtet, but, like most of his works, it rivals the very best of earlier masters of the form. This is definitely my favorite string quartet.

  • best violist i have seen on this piece

  • @crayhead we're rude like that ;P

  • The Cellist keeps giving me the finger...

  • This video has the perfect quality! Great upload, thanks!

  • you really can feel ravel when they play it.. really amazing performers... just brilliant...

  • i know this isn't important but the cellist and the first violin look like they're somehow related.

  • They are. The first violinist, violist, and 'cellist are siblings. It's in the description.

  • Hahaha! I love watching string players perform! They just get so into the music that they're practically falling out of their seats. Great performance and great recording too!

  • This movement is so amazing. This may possibly be my favorite piece of music in the entire world.

  • I love how much vibrato the 1st Violinist and violist used when they play the melody.....I love this song. The contrast between pizzicatto and the arco is amazing....

  • I love the music, and I agree the clarity of the pictures is just amazing. We can see exactly what the musicians are doing.

  • Windows Movie Maker is easy to use and popular, which explains the definite lower quality of most videos on YouTube, I think/

  • @thegoodgeneral What program did you use to create the file?

  • @thesafekind DivX Author 1.5. I'm not an expert on video editing, but this gave the best results (that I could see) visually and aurally.

  • I love the music but the quality of the picture is phenomenal!!! (I was on a delayed train this morning getting frustrated when I heard a woman's cell phone ring with the pizzicato melody, the thought of the music carried me away and I immediately looked up youtube to see if there was a recording, I was not disappointed)

  • I've heard the pizzicato melody on numerous ringtones as well.

    Glad you were able to find this video!

  • I had to hold back tears the entire time. This music is so powerful and has touched me deeply. There's nothing cooler than some big barbarian dude in the crowd giving the performers the "metal horns" hand sign after each movement.

  • Nothing cooler than that, indeed. Except maybe that not happening at a concert. That might be cooler.

  • haha you made me laugh so hard

  • Thanks for favoriting!

  • I get tears every time I hear this song. I went to see the Julliard Quartet perform the entire Debussy/Ravel quartets this summer at the Kimmel Center in Philadelphia. We had front row seats. Here I am this big, hairy, long haired guy in a Slayer t-shirt and camo pants just sitting there surrounded by a room full of elderly folks.

  • Studying 120 right now. Thanks!