Uhhhh, you don't have the right to let your child break the law. Whether you think you have the right to give your child a drop of alcohol or not, you don't. And because "kids will drink anyway" is not a reason to let them drink, even supervised. Because alcohol hurts a still developing teenagers brain.
However, in this case given the sign that only said "Mikes lemonade" the court could give some leeway to this guy.
girzwald3 "you don't have the right to let your child break the law"
You didn't read all of what I said, you are being dishonest. Since the child didn't drink any alcohol, it was false imprisonment, it was the government that was breaking the law. I'm not familiar with the laws of all the states, but from what I understand the laws in many states allow children to drink with parental supervision and for religious ceremonies. You might want to study the law and the Constitution. ;)
Uhhh, yes the child DID drink alcohol. Mikes hard lemonade has alcohol in it, go read a bottle. And if such laws exist to allow wine drinking they are in conflict with regular alcohol laws. You cant break the law just because your religious beliefs say otherwise.
The physical evidence indicates he didn't drink alcohol. I suspect he was pressured by the fascist by the politically correct mob mentality to lie. The physical evidence contradicts the testimony.
girzwald3 "Leo was taken by ambulance to Detroit's Children Hospital because clinic officials said he reported feeling a little nauseated after drinking about 12 ounces of the drink with a 5 percent alcohol content. But a blood sample taken at the hospital detected no trace of it."
If the child drank 12 ounces at 5% it should show up in a blood sample for several hours.
girzwald3 "You cant break the law just because your religious beliefs say otherwise."
Apparently because of your hysterical agenda you don't care about the law or the Constitution.
A law that violates the Constitution is not a legal law. As I said I'm not familiar with the laws of all the states, I would think the states that have laws against it are in violation of the Constitution.
girzwald3: As far as the brain damage argument you have made, the laws that allow parents to let their children drink responsibly of course would not include excessive drinking because that would be considered child abuse and endangerment.
Your logic is beyond flawed and reeks of moral decay. Whats the perfect amount of alcohol for every child that wont hurt their brain development? Define "excessive". Does that mean more then to just get them buzzed? Well guess what, that will hurt their developing brain. Maybe you should educate yourself on alcohol and its effects before you say kids should be able to drink. You ACLU wanabe.
girzwald3 "Your logic is beyond flawed and reeks of moral decay."
On the contrary. I would say the same about you. You don't seem to care about the law or Constitution reason or logic or morals. You seem more concerned with your fascist abolitionist agenda. I think the parents should be allowed some discretion. Not all people are the same, so the same amount would not be appropriate for every child or parent.
girzwald3: You remind me of the people that are afraid of chlorine in the water because it is a poison and can cause cancer. To the best of my knowledge no one has been poisoned by chlorinated water. The fact is chlorinated water saves lives. Chlorinated water saves hundreds of thousands of people year from things like malaria, dysentery, polio, etc...
Someone that wants to make a 5th of ounce of sacramental wine for a religious ceremony illegal is flawed and reeks of moral decay.
girzwald3: To the best of my knowledge parents are only allowed to give alcohol to their own children, not others because they are not the parents of those children.
Wikipedia
Alcoholic beverage
One of my neighbors children was even legally allowed to sell alcohol to adults because he was the owner of a beer shop. His son used to brag in school that he was allowed to sell alcohol.
Don't be hysterically politically correct and fascist. Be reasonable. ;)
Uhhhh, you don't have the right to let your child break the law. Whether you think you have the right to give your child a drop of alcohol or not, you don't. And because "kids will drink anyway" is not a reason to let them drink, even supervised. Because alcohol hurts a still developing teenagers brain.
However, in this case given the sign that only said "Mikes lemonade" the court could give some leeway to this guy.
girzwald3 3 years ago
girzwald3 "you don't have the right to let your child break the law"
You didn't read all of what I said, you are being dishonest. Since the child didn't drink any alcohol, it was false imprisonment, it was the government that was breaking the law. I'm not familiar with the laws of all the states, but from what I understand the laws in many states allow children to drink with parental supervision and for religious ceremonies. You might want to study the law and the Constitution. ;)
Schemefighter 3 years ago
Uhhh, yes the child DID drink alcohol. Mikes hard lemonade has alcohol in it, go read a bottle. And if such laws exist to allow wine drinking they are in conflict with regular alcohol laws. You cant break the law just because your religious beliefs say otherwise.
girzwald3 3 years ago
girzwald3 "yes the child DID drink alcohol"
Once again the facts are contrary to your claims.
The physical evidence indicates he didn't drink alcohol. I suspect he was pressured by the fascist by the politically correct mob mentality to lie. The physical evidence contradicts the testimony.
Schemefighter 3 years ago
girzwald3 "Leo was taken by ambulance to Detroit's Children Hospital because clinic officials said he reported feeling a little nauseated after drinking about 12 ounces of the drink with a 5 percent alcohol content. But a blood sample taken at the hospital detected no trace of it."
If the child drank 12 ounces at 5% it should show up in a blood sample for several hours.
Schemefighter 3 years ago
girzwald3 "You cant break the law just because your religious beliefs say otherwise."
Apparently because of your hysterical agenda you don't care about the law or the Constitution.
Schemefighter 3 years ago
girzwald3 "You cant break the law just because your religious beliefs say otherwise."
Apparently because of your hysterical agenda you don't care about the law or the Constitution.
A law that violates the Constitution is not a legal law. As I said I'm not familiar with the laws of all the states, I would think the states that have laws against it are in violation of the Constitution.
Schemefighter 3 years ago
girzwald3: As far as the brain damage argument you have made, the laws that allow parents to let their children drink responsibly of course would not include excessive drinking because that would be considered child abuse and endangerment.
Schemefighter 3 years ago
Your logic is beyond flawed and reeks of moral decay. Whats the perfect amount of alcohol for every child that wont hurt their brain development? Define "excessive". Does that mean more then to just get them buzzed? Well guess what, that will hurt their developing brain. Maybe you should educate yourself on alcohol and its effects before you say kids should be able to drink. You ACLU wanabe.
girzwald3 3 years ago
girzwald3 "Your logic is beyond flawed and reeks of moral decay."
On the contrary. I would say the same about you. You don't seem to care about the law or Constitution reason or logic or morals. You seem more concerned with your fascist abolitionist agenda. I think the parents should be allowed some discretion. Not all people are the same, so the same amount would not be appropriate for every child or parent.
Schemefighter 3 years ago
girzwald3: You remind me of the people that are afraid of chlorine in the water because it is a poison and can cause cancer. To the best of my knowledge no one has been poisoned by chlorinated water. The fact is chlorinated water saves lives. Chlorinated water saves hundreds of thousands of people year from things like malaria, dysentery, polio, etc...
Someone that wants to make a 5th of ounce of sacramental wine for a religious ceremony illegal is flawed and reeks of moral decay.
Schemefighter 3 years ago
girzwald3: To the best of my knowledge parents are only allowed to give alcohol to their own children, not others because they are not the parents of those children.
Wikipedia
Alcoholic beverage
One of my neighbors children was even legally allowed to sell alcohol to adults because he was the owner of a beer shop. His son used to brag in school that he was allowed to sell alcohol.
Don't be hysterically politically correct and fascist. Be reasonable. ;)
Schemefighter 3 years ago