Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
put alot of full birds's out of work
mr20yr 2 years ago
the wasted to much money for this bullshit
mr20yr 2 years ago
for anybody interested in what a complete FAILURE "army transformation" has been.
THE ARMY AFTER NEXT by: THOMAS K. ADAMS
the book is more objective then i am on the subject. the facts speak for themselves.
the army has spent the last 12 years trying to be the marine corps. 15 years..... and they still cant make it work. billions have been wasted shifting division and brigade organizations, and responsiblilities only to find out the old 3 brigade division structure works best.
mpower6428 3 years ago
This is part of the process in creating a more mobile force. Doing this allows the Army to rotate deployments and allows Soldiers to know when they will be deployed. The Army is an ever-changing force, it "gave up its history" years ago when it became more modernized and began creating NEW divisions. Soldiers are not trained at the division level, they are trained at the company level, therefore, there is no need to keep units permanently attached to divisions.
xKahunax 4 years ago
its a bad idea, the army allready has 2 or 3 brigades in a Division. doing this will ruin the history of the army and the goal of their units.
they want to push divisions aside as merley higher command but the command doest have any units permanatly attached. so the 1st infantry Div. could be attached 2 armor brigades and 1 infantry.
What the hell? Obviously it is a move Shoomaker has made to give all the excess generals a usefull job.
would the army be willing to give up its history?
PadawanOsswe 5 years ago