Added: 3 years ago
From: iliu23tomuch
Views: 6,932
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (70)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Who cares, Harper is a nazi.

  • NDP are doing amazing in the polls and just might have a chance, so those not wanting to chose the lesser of 2 evils realize you DO have another choice.. I'm confident if people went to the polls and really voted based on who they wanted and not trying to vote against harper or against ignatieff we might just have an amazing result, and a historical one..

  • my older brother works at the air port as one of the gaurds and ignatieff went therw his gate and he was a jerk 2 him

  • It's pathetic that some Canadian conservatives are claiming Ignatieff was not born in Canada. Our very own "Birther Movement" - how original...

    Google "Girther Movement" and find out about the new Tea Party-esque angle that could bury the left.

  • 1/3 of the country "MIGHT" vote for the Liberal Party...

    But 1/3 of the country doesn't want to vote any party with Ignatieff as leader!!!

    That's the bottom like Mike.

  • Liberal Party = Goof Troop

  • Obviously a doctored video footage, what are you trying to prove?

  • who conservative? the liberals?

    that paradigm is fake

    left right=same puppets

  • Go back to Russia Count Ignatief we in Canada dont need nicotine teeth and american/english /russian brought in to run our asses

  • Is that why he never smiles? Always so miserable--I thought he was constipated! Now I know he is also a chain smoker!

  • Send this guy home! Who let him back in anyway?

  • PATHOLOGICAL "WE AMERICANS" LIEING IS THE ISSUE, more than his 34 years away. That kind of repititious publicly stated lies (hundreds of times) is a classic symptom of psychopathy. Either he is 100% delusional or he thinks the public are complete idiots, take your pick.

  • You conservatives crack me up. Conservatism is like a religion. All you have to do is you blindly believe, ignore facts, demonize the opposition and repeat simple phrases over and over. Harper couldn't get a majority against Dion and the polls show where he is. And Harper tried to form the same coalition in 2004. but blind conservatives just ignore this and attack Iggy instead. He will be your PM soon. I cant wait

  • Isn't it a bit hypocritical to label all Conservatives in this manner? Most people I know who voted Conservative in the last election came from a variety of backgrounds and actually voted Liberal in the past. Most were simply upset with internal division within the Liberal party. They were not blind to the faults of the Conservatves; they just weighed their options. If you believe Conservative voters sit back and fling insults, you are wrong. In fact, you have just done what you claim to object.

  • DUDE! We are not going to legalize pot!

  • I'm just want no more lie-beral corruption! What can I do???

  • If the liberals did neocon style attack ads you would all be whining your heads off. There is so much dirt on Harper. Just look up his own quotes. He'd be done in one commercial.

  • Dumbass! The Lieberals have the worst record for using dishonest attack ads. The Tory ads are factual and use Little Count Iggy's own words against him. The Liberal ads remember "Solders in our cities, in Canada???" are just pure fabrications.  I always get a laugh out of Lie-berals complaining about negative ads. I guess they thought they were just fine when they were using them!

  • You neocons are so funny. All you do is name call and choose which facts to ignore. lol The truth is that Harper is scared and since he can't actually govern, he has to do attack ads. They say more about him than it does about Iggy. Look up Harper's racist quotes. Maybe the libs should use those against him. Wait. Nevermind. Conservatism=hypocrisy. You would just ignore those too. Make sure you call me another name k.

  • Racist quotes! That's too funny. How about Iggy's right hand man - he accused Chinese Canadians of eating cat and serving it to unsuspecting Canadians in their restaurants! That's racist! What made CatScam even worse was that little count Iggy didn't fire the clown and took more than a week to issue a weak kneed call for him to apologize! The Lie-berals already tried to demonize Harper with all sorts of out of context quotes and they failed. Iggy is being skewered by himself.

  • 3/ Dion's stint as leader/ sacrificial goat for the Liberal Party allowed the next person in line

    ( Ignatieff or Rae at that point in time ) a bit of distance from Chretien and Martin's final years in office. In other words, people hadn't had time to forget just how awful the Liberal Party was. The Liberals ran Dion as their leader knowing full well that he didn't stand a chance as leader. They were saving Iggy for a time when the party would be on more solid ground

    with Canadians.

  • As for the 2nd option:

    the option suggesting that a third of the Liberal Party would vote Liberal no matter who their leader was.

    Iggy is basically saying that one third

    - that's 33% - of his party's members are mindless lemmings. It's not a matter of the best person winning under those circumstances it's a matter of their leader winning regardless of what he/she may or may not have to offer.

    33% of the Liberals voted for Dion and 66% saw him for the joke that he was.

  • Regardless of whether Iggy's comment was the

    1st or 2nd option, it was self serving. Iggy is basically promoting himself as the savior or his party. Of course, he looks good following Dion.

    Who wouldn't?

  • The 1/3 comment was in regards to Liberals always getting 30% of the vote in elections. Thus Canadians would be the ones who are the mindless lemmings, not just the members. As for the number of liberals who are mindless lemmings, probably 100%. Same would go for 100% of conservatives. Any person who subscribes themselves to one political party is a mindless lemming in my book.

  • I am in complete agreement with you in regards to any person who subscribes themselves to one

    party being a mindless lemming. I have always and will always declare myself non-partisan.

    The 30% of the vote that the Liberals have gotten in elections does not reflect 30% of Canadian voters voting for the Liberals. You have to take into account the members of other political parties who vote strategically against their own party. They vote Liberal to prevent the Conservatives from winning.

  • Agreed, my apologies. 30% of people who vote is what I should have said. Remember only a quarter or so of Canadians actually vote. Secondly, people vote for different reasons. Some people vote for a PM, some people vote for a Part, some people vote for their local MP.

  • Those people don't vote for who or what they believe in, they vote for the party that they believe will do the least amount of damage.

    A vote FOR, under those circumstances, is not an endorsement of the Liberal Party and it should not be regarded as such.

  • My last statement was an extension of my previous statement. You're right about people voting for a variety of different reasons : voting for PM, voting for a Party's entire platform, voting for a party's stand on a hot button issue ( ie - capital punishment, abortion, environment, etc. ), voting for their local MP.

  • Sorry, I don't see anything wrong with what he said, its an undeniable fact, since confederation the Liberals have always had at least 30% of the vote. Go look it up!

  • Here's what's wrong with Iggy's statement, jafac.

    He says that ' a third of this country WANTS to vote for the Liberal Party IF you give it half a decent reason to do so '.

    It's a round about way of saying that a third of the country WANTS to vote for the Liberal Party BUT it won't because it ISN'T being given a decent reason to do so.

    (or)

    It's a direct shot at the sheepish mentality of Liberal voters who will vote Liberal regardless of who their leader is. They'd vote Daffy Duck for P.M.

  • Maybe I misunderstood your comment, but the 2nd option seems to contradict the 1st. If 1/3 Canadians want to vote for the Libs given a decent reason, then why did so many Canadians abandon the party with Dion as the leader? Undeniably there are a group of people who will vote Lib no matter what. But every party has that group, its the base. Clearly there's more to the Party than that group of sheep, otherwise Dion would've won. As an aside, I love how every pro Iggy comment has a thumbs down.

  • I love how every pro Iggy comment has a thumbs down too.

    The 2nd option doesn't contradict the 1st option because the bracketed word 'or' seperated the 2 options that I provided.

    Canadians abandoned the Liberal Party when Dion was leader because !/. He was viewed as a traitor for climbing into bed with the Bloc

    ( a party with designs on seperating from Canada ) and joining forces with the NDP

    ( champagne socialists of the worst order )

    for what he could get out of us NOT what he could do for us

  • 2/ Dion would have been a joke on the World Stage as Canada's leader. English speaking Canadians across the country couldn't understand his english. English speaking Canadians would have ended up needing english subtitles whenever he spoke english on televised press conferences.

    Dion was to the Liberals what Kim Campbell was to the Conservatives: a person who took the job as leader of their party because nobody else wanted it at the time.

  • 1) The coalition occurred AFTER the election. Mass abandonment of the Libs occurred before this.2) Dion was and is well respected internationally in academic circles. He was a scholar at the Brookings Institute, chaired the UN Climate Change summit in Mtl. As for his english, Chretien wasn't a whole lot better and he did fine. 3) Dion became leader by mistake at the 06 convention. Rae and Iggy both ran against him, so their votes were split. That being said, Dion was a terrible leader, no doubt.

  • Comment removed

  • You're right that the coalition/ attempted coup took place after the election. The Liberals didn't like the way the election turned out so they joined forces with the NDP and the Bloc to reverse their misfortune.

    Mass abandonment of the Libs started during the Martin years following on the heels of Chretien's shameful last years in office.

    Chretien was reduced to playing with his (golf) balls in front of an inquiry.

    Chretien speaks english a lot better than Dion. Laughable but understandable.

  • that's because of the color of the flag!

  • What a pathetic use of editing that didn't even succeed in making Ignatieff look bad. Nice try neocon. Maybe the Harperites should try actually governing instead of just attacking the opposition. It worked with Dion. It won't work with Iggy

  • It's working in much the same way that the Conservative attack on the coalition worked.

    All the Consevatives had to do was point out that the Liberals would go so far as to climb in bed with the Bloc ( a political party whose agenda is to seperate from Canada with no concern whatsoever for the damage that they might do to everyone else in the country ) to

    gain political advantage.

    Iggy is nothing but a self-serving opportunist.

    Wise up or change your name to thedeluded3092

  • Get your facts straight! Harper tried to form the EXACT coalition in Sept of '04 when Martin was PM. Iggy didn't actually want the coaltion and stopped it from happening. If he wanted to, he would already be PM in this coalition. Harper was the self-serving opportunist who would have been in bed with the NDP and Bloc.Get your head out of your hypocritical conservative ass and look at the facts before you make a fool out of yourself on here. Thanx for the usual intelligent neocon name calling.

  • The FACT deluded3092 is that 'O4 was 'then' as in not NOW. The way it was or the way it may have been are not the way it is or the way it will be in the Canadian public's eyes. Iggy is the leader of a party that sought to form a coalition with the Bloc in very recent memory. In other words, it still stings.Saying that Harper tried to do the same thing doesn't remove the fact that the Liberal tried to do the same thing.

    Whatever wrong went before doesn't give them permission to do wrong now.

  • Get your priorities straight deluded and you'll have a clearer view about what's actually going on in Canadian politics.A person doesn't have to be a Conservative to find fault with Iggy and the Liberal Party.I'm non partisan. I pointed out that people such as yourself ( Liberal Party sheep whose only perspective is the flock of Liberal Party sheep around them) are decreasing in number. Your 'power'base is diminishing regardless of however you may 'Bah' otherwise.

  • Comment removed

  • You are a typical conservative hypocrite. It's like religious people. As long as you believe, ignore facts and say the same thing over and over it becomes true. lol

  • oooh 'religious people' .

    What next 'nazi'? How about 'fascist'?

    'typical conservative hypocrite". Hah!

    Stop typing and start thinking, deluded3092.

  • hu.... what's wrong with what he said???

  • this is from an 8min. interview I suggest you find and watch the whole of it. Context is everything.

  • That isn't a unique ability at all, someone once said that a great politician is someone who can talk for an hour without saying anything. All politicians can do that.

  • I think this person rather intended destructive criticism, not unlike; "Harper appears highly subjective and lowly thought when public speaking" .. or if I was to be myself more objective; "I wish to poop on prime minister Harper's forehead"

  • That's true, what I meant was that you shouldn't consider some to be good because they can talk, what matters is what they say.

  • thats not out of context at all....

  • what he said is the truth, I suggest you deal with it

  • micheal would make a good PM

  • YESS!!! take those comments of context! good job!

  • ignatieff is a fraud, fake left, endorses torture..avoid him at all costs

  • Ignatieff is so arrogant...

  • You're a perfect example of a stupid person who arrogantly declares themself 'intelligent'.

    For your information that just ain't so.

    Calling shit 'feces' doesn't change the stink, deluded3092.

    You're focussing on Iggy's delivery rather than what he's actually delivering.

    Recognize the blanks in his speech for the blanks that they are.

    Don't fill in the blanks with excuses.

    Bush is gone if you haven't noticed.

    Live today. You're dying in the past.

  • Aren't you just a genius. Obviously I hit a nerve. The more you talk, the less strength your argument has. Calling me stupid or changing my name doesn't hurt my feelings. I will do your simple talk so you understand. Iggy isn't perfect and he is arrogant. I never said he wasn't. But in simple conservative fashion, It's all black and white. Iggy is the lesser evil and is the next PM. Face it. Harper's disapproval ratings tell the story. I'm gonna change your name to "weighty' cuzyou must be fat.

  • Pointing out that you are stupid and assigning you a more appropriate Youtube name did nothing to smarten you up either, deluded3092.

  • refer to my above comment you idiot

  • People only have to refer to ALL of your comments here to see what an idiot you truly are, deluded3092.

  • Intelligent? If you actually read some of his stuff you'll realize there is not much substance there. I remember reading that they used have a joke about him in England: everyone knows what an idiot savant is: someone who appears to be an idiot but in fact is a wise man. Well, Ignatieff was a savant idiot.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more