Added: 4 years ago
From: Stefancos
Views: 45,818
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (89)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • best composer hands down.

  • I would say that there is 1 person whatever...except that I can't think of anybody on this planet who dislikes John Williams.

  • lol, beethoven!!

  • he's right there with mozart and beatles 

  • @rivariad he's in a class alone . He's "incomparable"

  • @rivariad the beatles suck

  • @TheOrganicBeats i wasnt expecting a troll under a john williams video, weird

  • @rivariad Point being you can't use the beatles, and john williams in the same sentence.(WTF mozart is in a completely different league of genius). Camparing the beatles to these guys is like comparing hannah montana to whitney houston dude

  • @TheOrganicBeats do you even know what a comparison is? cuz i'm sure i didnt compare any of'em, point is from a creative perspective, all of them are equally genius and innovative in their own areas.

  • @rivariad why is TheOrganicBeats a troll? Because he dislikes the Beatles? I don't understand...explain.

  • i want to die so that he will live instead of me

  • @drisdrisdrisdris haha great comment but I think it is Zimmer who scores the music for the movie about the fountain of youth!

  • legend!!

  • GOD, why is there a dislike.!!!! i think the one who bushed this button was trunk and missed the like button

  • This man has provided some of the best musical scores of all time. I hope that he lives to 100.

  • The one disliked the video is a Justin Bieber fan for sure.

  • @tootallbg Why?.. Why did you feel the need to bring up that crapsack in a vid that has nothing to do with it.

  • @tootallbg no need to bring that loser up in the same sentence as John Williams. Pretty sad, all those youtube users who bring that guy up just to get positive reactions.

  • 3:00 Poor John :(

  • He is AMAZING!

  • I would like to know why someone didn't like this video... ;-)

  • does anyone know to where one should write if you want to send John Williams a letter?

  • @mackanmodh Search on google "contact John Williams" and take the second link. There are three adresses.

  • They should do a film about his life and call the film "Towner" (John Williams' second name). It'd look like "Amadeus", Williams would be Mozart and Zimmer (example) would be Salieri. That'd be great, eh?

  • Star Wars would simply NOT be the same without John Williams.

    John's music has been the catchiest, most epic music of so many generations now....lets keep it going.

  • Comment removed

  • John Williams is the Jedi Master of film music!

  • damn how does he come up with all those motifs... they are always so perfect

  • brilliant

  • I also thank Gustav Holst for creating The Planets suite, which served as inspirational base for almost "any" sci-fi movie including star wars.

    Listen to Mars Bringer of War, you hear many very familar phrases (especially around 1-2min you hear how JW directly quoted it)

  • I LOVE YOU JOHN WILLIAMS!!! My. musical. hero. =D

  • LORD OF MUSIC

  • dude like fucking grand master he was in the air force he is the man he is a beast!!!! WOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! your my inspiration i am studying music now because of you mr. williams

  • master !

  • he's referring to debussy ^_^ i love this man, im soaking so much in right now!

  • He's the FUCKING man

  • i love this composer tho im more of a hard rock fan i love the soundtracks hes done for star wars XD battle of the heroes is my fav

  • get over it. john williams is a composer. before classical music was called "classiscal music" it was just music. never forget that all music is is the culmatnation of the very first human banging a stick on a tree or rock.

  • he a better hero for me then obi wan

  • John williams uses a motive from Dvorak 9th symphony 3rd movement in star wars.

  • This is film scoring. This is not "classical music." If you like, you may listen to his actual concert music, free from obvious references.

  • Classical music was made for the concert hall. Modern classical and neo-classical music is music which uses the forms of the classical era (roughly 1750-1850), drawing on the techniques and rules of composers from that era. John Williams writes contemporary, modern, and neo-romantic music.

    Concert music does not mean "classical music." You have the periods (baroque, classical, romantic, modern, impressionist, etc.), and then the context (film, stage, ballet, opera, etc.).

  • may I butt in here on this one? I know it's a little late, but it's an intelligent arguement that you both have, I must agree with certain aspects of both of your arguements. John Williams is of a Dying Breed! He is a classical composer in all respects in my opinion, but not by the stereotypical mindset of "Classical" music (Beethoven, Back, Strause, the GREAT Tsaichovksy et al) but he still more than qualifies as to being able to hold is own in that very distinguished list of characters yes?

  • Beethoven and Strauss are Romantic, Tchaikovsky is late-Romantic, and Bach is Baroque. None of them are classical composers.

    My argument has never been to discredit Williams's skill (or stature) as a composer; merely to make a distinction. By all definitions, John Williams is a contemporary composer, not a classical composer. He would have to have been alive in the 18th century for that.

    As for implying that he is of a dying breed; Williams is the most popularized... there are others.

  • The word "classical" is also defined as "something that survives trends because of the high class." Ideal example to fit the concept is when one person, the composer, created the music by writing it down, and done so with artistic ambition.

  • Though that is, indeed, a working definition of the word "classic" (and therefore "classical"), the original usage was a reference to antiqueness works, such as ideologies of the Greeks. The classical period, roughly 1750-1850, is described as having been immersed in classic ideologies. I think both listed definition (yours and mine) of "classic" contribute to each other.

    However, classical music as a term to describe concert music should be discouraged.

  • Minor argument here. Beethoven may have led the Classical Era in music to a close, but he stilled adhered to its forms, thereby he is still Classical. Apart from that, the idea of "classical" is that it can either refer to the era, OR to the conception that is imposed by the people upon any music that isn't electronically produced (at least mostly, exceptions being such people as Cage or Boulez). You have to remember, it is hard to say "classical" without a cringe, and with it John Williams.

  • Beethoven was also living in the Classical era, so you are right when you point out the inaccuracy of my calling him specifically a Romantic. However, I disagree with your assessment that classical music, as a term, should be used to broadly encompass any form of concert music.

    I would try to remember your last sentence if I were able to understand it.

  • My last sentence was unfortuately cut to minimalist standards due to character count. What I was trying to make reference to was how in modern society, even the mention of the word "classical" in most circles will make the masses cringe in disgust. That is all. As well, just viewing things periodically is a tad narrow, and culturally demonstrates that either you are ignorant, or uncaring. Also, in what instance is Beethoven a Romantic? That is all I ask.

  • I'm not an expert on Beethoven, but I think his work starting in the 1800s is widely regarded as being Romantic works. I think Symp.3 is a popular example. Those are weasel words, but it's the impression I've gotten, and it's one with which I tend to agree; in my opinion, if he pioneered the change, he is a Romantic.

    I've never run into occasions where people have cringed at "classical music," I have also never encountered accusations of narrow-mindedness when referring to the eras.

  • Excellent point

  • If that was a reply to me, thank you.

  • Well there's an old saying - good composers borrow - great composers steal!

  • This is too true. The best part that is missing is the third: "the best composers steal...by making it their own."

  • @jwd0808 Great quote it is. We build our work on the shoulders of masters. John Williams on Stravinsky's and Prokofiev and others, indeed... Beethoven on CPE Bach's and on Haydn's definitely... It is not for nothing that western music evolved slowly but surely for 1000 years already!

  • Those comparisons are noted, but not as heavy in credence as people think.

  • John Williams is one of my many favorite composers. He's a classic!!!

  • @loulou656 Mine too my friend. HE IS MY FAVOURITE.

    I can't imagine no one else who will match or compete on his level of swashbuckling theme's lol.

  • Sure, he's inspired by Wagner and Mahler...why not? But he's not just a replica of those classic composers. If you really believe that you don't know much about John Williams.

  • yea...i did a research paper on him....for my musicology class and compared him to those for mentioned composers...and i got a 98 on it...and my teacher is one of the top 3 women in the field of musicology...so try again...

  • You got a 98 because you expressed an opinion, not because you are right. Please don't convince yourself being a college student makes you intelligent.

  • Argument of authority. "i should know because i studied it in school lol."

  • thank you GOD for giving us john williams.

  • @70tee, thank John Williams for putting his talent out there, not God.

  • @AIgrim No reason to broadcast your atheism... geez.

  • @LPalex2511, no reason for 70tee to broadcast his religion, jeez.

  • Awesome Man...I aspire to be as good as him one day.

  • I'm sorry I wholey disagree with your assesment. And I'd be willing to argue my point of view.

  • Sorry if i'm being rude, but thats a dumb argument. If i want to compose like Wagner there's probably a list of similar size of composers he (Wagner) liked.

    What i would suggest is to study music a lot, learn how your favourite composers work (that's whats gonna make you sound similar to them).. and of course, don't expect to master anything in less than a decade. :)

  • yea that's real easy man. a walk in the park

  • The only true Master of music! I admire him deeply.

  • LHP, I love JW, but he's not the "Only" true master. After all he was the under study of the great Bernard Herrmann. Check his stuff out. He scored amazing works such as that for Citizen Kane, Vertigo, Psycho, Fahrenheits 451, Taxi Driver...etc.

  • At this time I'm mostly in and connected with JW music! He has a rare but still authentic classic style which conveys pure connotation and true essence... therefor he's the greatest to me but also Bach's music is a real profound love to me! Thanks for recognizing his mentor, I haven't heard a lot of his music yet so I'll check his music more carefully then.

  • Your point of view is very narrow-minded

  • @LHPRivs You mean a contemporary master of music. That he is. There are many true masters of music, only things is most of them died about 100-150 years ago. But Williams is a modern day classical treasure since classical music has almost become extinct (in terms of composing) because video has indeed killed the radio star.

  • @LHPRivs Not the ONLY one, but he is one of only so few.

  • @LHPRivs The Master. Period

  • @LHPRivs hm.... I kinda think that john williams and danny elfman are the best movie composers;

    so I'd say they're equal....

  • @LHPRivs not bach, or beethoven, or mozart?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more