I'm glad you are "willing to learn a little about the topic". If you ever need some direction, I'll be happy to give you enough research to read for the next few years.
I'm not sure I have few years to dedicate to reading journal articles but I would greatly appreciate a list of source that you suggest I start with. Thanks very much for the interesting debate. - Mike
Therefore, the mercury we eat is dangerous and can accumulate over time. If a person eats a lot of fish, maybe they should consider chelation at some point. However, do yourself a favor and research what happens when you inject mercury and aluminum into infants and babies. I have spent hundreds of hours that you apparently have not and can document everything I state with scientific evidence.
I don't we should blindly inject vaccines or anything else into ourselves or our children without looking at the ingredients and understanding the risks. I do worry that influential people, such as yourself, other medical professionals, Glen Beck, etc., will cause people to believe that the risks of getting the flu vaccine are greater than the risks of not getting the vaccine. Glen Beck is probably OK with that because he didn't take an oath to do no harm but doctors don't have same luxury.
Based on years of in-depth study, as well as my mother's 30 years of study, I would say "YES", the risk of getting the flu vaccine is absolutely greater than the risk of getting the flu... no questions asked. If this is not totally apparent to you, I suggest you get more information on the topic.
As I indicated, I would like to take you up on your offer for direction and research to review. I'm interested in seeing articles that you, your mother or colleagues have written on the topic. Feel free to send links or I have access to most peer reviewed journals and should be able to locate articles if you send titles and authors. Thanks very much, Mike
Secondly, yes, infants and babies that are poisoned with heavy metals have most likely received this toxic burden from vaccines. And I can appreciate your "fish" argument because a lot of people are confused as well. What you must realize is that INGESTING (eating) heavy metals is totally different than INJECTING heavy metals. It shouldn't take a brain surgeon to realize that.
In 2009, everyone in the U.S. has access to a thimerosal-free flu vaccine so choosing between ethyl mercury exposure and vaccination is not an issue. Maybe my "fish" argument wasn't presented in the best way possible. My point was that fish we regularly consume contains a greater amount of a more harmful type of mercury and most people don't think twice about it. The public view on this type of issue is often based on a skewed perception of risk rather than actual risk.
Most all vaccines available are NOT mercury-free. Furthermore, I wish that mercury was the only concern. Let me know when aluminum-free and squalene-free are also available.
Monstermike - my first recommendation is that you actually LISTEN to my interview because what you would have heard is my promotion of using super-antioxidants to chelate heavy metals, which HAS NO RISK. So, for that reason, naturally I did not elaborate on the non-existent risk.
Would you tell us about the side effects/risks of chelation therapy? Are vaccines the primary source of the mercury and heavy metals in our bodies? If not, would you suggest we stop eating fish or receive chelation therapy after every fish containing meal? I think you should present a more complete view of the issues. When you don't it seems like you are just trying to scare people and you lose credibility with those of us who know or are willing to learn a little about the topic.
I'm glad you are "willing to learn a little about the topic". If you ever need some direction, I'll be happy to give you enough research to read for the next few years.
reneetoccodc 2 years ago
I'm not sure I have few years to dedicate to reading journal articles but I would greatly appreciate a list of source that you suggest I start with. Thanks very much for the interesting debate. - Mike
monstermike1982 2 years ago
Therefore, the mercury we eat is dangerous and can accumulate over time. If a person eats a lot of fish, maybe they should consider chelation at some point. However, do yourself a favor and research what happens when you inject mercury and aluminum into infants and babies. I have spent hundreds of hours that you apparently have not and can document everything I state with scientific evidence.
reneetoccodc 2 years ago
I don't we should blindly inject vaccines or anything else into ourselves or our children without looking at the ingredients and understanding the risks. I do worry that influential people, such as yourself, other medical professionals, Glen Beck, etc., will cause people to believe that the risks of getting the flu vaccine are greater than the risks of not getting the vaccine. Glen Beck is probably OK with that because he didn't take an oath to do no harm but doctors don't have same luxury.
monstermike1982 2 years ago
Based on years of in-depth study, as well as my mother's 30 years of study, I would say "YES", the risk of getting the flu vaccine is absolutely greater than the risk of getting the flu... no questions asked. If this is not totally apparent to you, I suggest you get more information on the topic.
reneetoccodc 2 years ago
As I indicated, I would like to take you up on your offer for direction and research to review. I'm interested in seeing articles that you, your mother or colleagues have written on the topic. Feel free to send links or I have access to most peer reviewed journals and should be able to locate articles if you send titles and authors. Thanks very much, Mike
monstermike1982 2 years ago
Secondly, yes, infants and babies that are poisoned with heavy metals have most likely received this toxic burden from vaccines. And I can appreciate your "fish" argument because a lot of people are confused as well. What you must realize is that INGESTING (eating) heavy metals is totally different than INJECTING heavy metals. It shouldn't take a brain surgeon to realize that.
reneetoccodc 2 years ago
In 2009, everyone in the U.S. has access to a thimerosal-free flu vaccine so choosing between ethyl mercury exposure and vaccination is not an issue. Maybe my "fish" argument wasn't presented in the best way possible. My point was that fish we regularly consume contains a greater amount of a more harmful type of mercury and most people don't think twice about it. The public view on this type of issue is often based on a skewed perception of risk rather than actual risk.
monstermike1982 2 years ago
Most all vaccines available are NOT mercury-free. Furthermore, I wish that mercury was the only concern. Let me know when aluminum-free and squalene-free are also available.
reneetoccodc 2 years ago
Monstermike - my first recommendation is that you actually LISTEN to my interview because what you would have heard is my promotion of using super-antioxidants to chelate heavy metals, which HAS NO RISK. So, for that reason, naturally I did not elaborate on the non-existent risk.
reneetoccodc 2 years ago
Would you tell us about the side effects/risks of chelation therapy? Are vaccines the primary source of the mercury and heavy metals in our bodies? If not, would you suggest we stop eating fish or receive chelation therapy after every fish containing meal? I think you should present a more complete view of the issues. When you don't it seems like you are just trying to scare people and you lose credibility with those of us who know or are willing to learn a little about the topic.
monstermike1982 2 years ago