The Worst Movie ever! Godzilla OF THE 70'S (The obvious rubber suits) were better than this sad excuse of a movie, at least Godzilla was original. This movie ripped off everything from Star Wars through Star Ship Troopers to Flash Gordon.
The only things that this movie made people think of was either "WOW isn't it perdy?" or "I Want My Money Back!". I challenge ANYONE to prove me wrong! What was the thinking part of this movie, what makes you defend it like your own child? Please confine your remarks to the movie; no lame excuses like "It made lots of money", "it won awards", "JJ Abrams Rocks", or "fuck you". Keep it civilized and clear. Don't be a popinjay when responding.
@Trekfreek How about the acting. Each character was portrayed perfectly by each actor/ actress. Aside from Chris Pine who still held up his own. The story is great because it was written in a way where you don't have to be a trekkie or watch any other movie to understand it. Anybody could come in and enjoy it fully. I admit the one problem I had with the movie was that the villain's motivation was kinda immature. But that's not what this movie is trying to express.
@Trekfreek It was about character interactions. That was the most important part of the series. And that's the most important part here. They ingeniously incorporated scenes in the story that showed how all of the characters are awesome. You remember how Chekhov is a badass at math. How Sulu can fight. How Smart and clever Aurora is at tracking enemy signals; and how amazing Scotty is at engineering and teleporting. It shows what makes them all special and I thought that was clever
@28217 PS. I also did not need to post over a dozen times (while repeating myself over and over) to make my point. Learn to consolidate your thoughts.
@Trekfreek That's what the story is about. Character development, relationships, and Confrontations. Just like the show, that was the most important clincher. Not the villain. The friendship between Kirk and Bones and the confrontations between Kirk and Spock were amazing. Especially when old Spock came and told him that he was the true captain of the enterprise.
@Trekfreek Don't you get it! The story wasn't about Nero. It was about following Kirk and the other's rise to becoming the Captain and crew of the Enterprise. That's why everyone loves it. :)
@28217 Obviously YOU don't get it. Story telling includes everyone in the movie, EVEN the villain. Also the way they got together was like 90210 not Star Trek, and The way Kirk got his command was like Star Wars on Acid again not at all like Star Trek. The Characters were not the ones from the show, the acting was so bad that if I had directed it I also would have probably used lens flares to trick my audience into thinking it was good (I HATE LENSFLARES!). Also you are not film guru like me.
@Trekfreek Every story needs an antagonist. That was just the token villain or obstacle star trek uses to help the team come closer together. The acting was amazing. All of the actors played perfect younger versions of the crew. You have to realize. This is the beginning. They are much younger then the crew on the series. So it obvious that they all would act more energetic then the 40 year olds on the show. But when it comes to personality, each character was portrayed perfectly.
@28217 "Every story needs an antagonist “Wrong again. "Star Trek IV", "2001", & "Evelyn" did not have an antagonist. Good Antagonists arn't cookie cutter. Real ST Antagonists are complex characters (Kahn, Nomad, Q, etc...) "each character was portrayed perfectly." They were no ware near like the original characters, and I seen better acting in a mellow drama play! Also it’s not the beginning, To see the real beginning watch Star Trek Origins: Kirk. PS I'm 43 & still can out run any 18 year old.
@Trekfreek All star trek stories. (The good ones) focused on the characters relationships more then the villain. Everyone says the characters were portrayed amazingly except you. I knew it. I know your type. You claim to open to be proven wrong but that's a lie. I responded telling you what the story was about. And then all you said back to me was that the villain sucked. I told you how the characters were portrayed perfectly. And then all you said was the characters sucked.
@28217 GO and watch the real Star Trek and compare the characters to the ones in the new movie. If you have a sharp eye and an open mind (like you claim to have) then you will see that the characters in the new movie don't match the ones in the original series (or even in the fan show Phase II). I gave you8 plenty of reasons why the Villain + the acting + the Story + the directing + the dialog + the characters “Sucked". But you have not given me one logical reason why this movie was good.
@Trekfreek Your not given me any reasons other then saying how they suck or how bad it is. (Like that says something.) Your not willing to have a decent argument. You just want to be right. And the moment you said the acting was terrible you proved that. Karl Urban portrayed a young bones near perfectly and was outrageous. Even other 2009 Star Trek haters have the decency to admit that Zach did a great job at Spock. Give me real retorts aside from they suck. Give me examples from the film
Respond to this video...And P.S. Arnold Schwarzenegger can kick any kids ass. That doesn't mean he'll feel inclined to do it as opposed to 30 years ago where would run jump snap limbs and crush spines. It doesn't take a genius to know when you become older you become more mellow and calm. It doesn't mean you don't have the capability to do high energy things. You just can't act that way all the time like the young people in this movie. You see....explanation
@28217 Wrong again! Despite what you might read in the tabloids Arnold Schwarzenegger never EVER wanted to, or did, "run jump snap limbs and crush spines" in real life and he still would do all that on screen today if given the right kind of script. He did not "mellow" he just decided to do something more important than make movies. And I can, and do, act hyper all the time because I want to. The actors in this movie don’t; half the time I think they are on valium.
@Trekfreek Omg!. Your so stupid. lol. Im not talking about conscious control. I never once said that a 40 year old is incapable of jumping about. If they want to, I'm sure they can. But they won't be able to keep it up. Look at all of Arnold's movies in the 90's. Still a badass. But barely any running or jumping. Just walking around slowly and looking cool. And I can't believe someone's actually debating the fact that a 40 year old won't have as much stamina as a 20 year old.
@28217."But they won't be able to keep it up" You want to put you money where you little bratty mouth is? I challenge you to find any 40 year old that is his ideal weight and health for that age and challenge him to a physical and mental contest. I guarantee he would clean your clock and eat crow! I know 60 year olds who could last 30-60 minutes longer than any 20 year old; AGE MEANS NOTHING kid. Some day you will understand that.
@Trekfreek You just proved how remedial you are. "I know 60 year olds who could last longer then a 20 year old" You can always find someone that breaks the curve. But there's no way an average 43 year old has as much stamina as a 23 year old. Wow. It's insane that I'm actually arguing this. You're at your physical prime at 20. More then half of my yr 40 patients has Chronic Fatigue as a symptom. It's not possible for someone under the age of 25 to have chronic failure. I can't believe this
@28217 Patients? What are you a Doctor of? Chronic fatigue is just a symptom of a greater issue, usually high stress. This is common among 40 year olds not due to loss of physical ability but because of emotional stress from rising families, work, & midlife blues. This can be overcome with therapy & spiritual up lifting such as renewing confidence & helping them to see what they have instead of what was lost. PS. Believe it or Not; I don't care.
@BondFreek I'm a neurologist. I was just explaining to Trek Freek how young adults (BSL) and stamina are higher than anyone elses. I didnt mean for anyone else too get wrapped up into this. And Chronic Failure is a symptom not a diagnosis. And the most common reason for it is depression. That at least is what I was taught. This is weird though. Are you a Neurologist as well? If you are, please tell me the author of the Textbook of Nervous System book where you learned this from. Interesting
@28217 That's just what I said. "fatigue is just a symptom of a greater issue, usually high stress". I'm a student of psychology, chemistry, philosophy, statistics, physics, quantum mechanics, and Accounting. I learned everything I know about the human brain from my mentor the psychiatrist Dr. Copland, and 7 years of psychology classes. Statisticly speeking, there is no proof that age by its self makes people slow down.
@BondFreek Wow! Well I can't argue with someone with that kind of Resume....except High Stress defiantly is a symptom, not a diagnosis. Chronic failure does cannot result in stress. That dosent make any sense. Its the opposite if anything. When you age your metabolism drops, (bsl) rises, and due to your blood vessels being overused, you don't vasodilate and absorb nutrients. Muscle tissue wears. And your heart weakens because of blood sugar resulting in heart defects such as CF
@28217 As a philologist I disagree. Manny physical problems can be produced by high stress. Many things in life can be caused by stress and quite often stress is self inflected. Also low metabolism, high blood pressure, lack of vasodilator, tissue wear, weak hart ect... are a result of long term abuse of the body not age. Also for a doctor, your spelling of medical terms is very poor.
@Trekfreek Thats what it is. Stamina which you tend to relieve yourself of through time. The fact that your arguing a solid fact like this isn't because you don't believe it. You just want to make yourself seem right for not liking this movie. Without giving any solid facts about its problem as a movie. A guy who want's to be right will say anything to prove his point. Give me a specific plot hole in the movie. And I will actually admit that I was wrong. Which is more anyone can about u.
@28217 here I go again! Plot hole # 1 Red matter Makes black holes that suck ships into the past but destroys planets & damaged ships How is it possible? Plot hole # 2, what was Nero doing for 25 years? Plot hole # 3 why did Nero's crew stick around instead of running off to warn Romulus of the impending doom? Plot hole # 4 What happened to Kirk's punishment for cheating? Is that enough? PS. I will always admit when I’m wrong if proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Unlike you I'm more polite.
@Trekfreek Hey I was being polite when I first commented on what it was about. You responded on how I "Obviously don't get it" and how "I'm not a film guru like you", maximizing yourself while minimizing me. I never said I was film guru or better than you or called you any names at first. You were'nt polite. Now I would love to have a polite debate with you. That being said, you were acting a jerk to me and a just retaliated. Now I'm sorry for all I said and hopefully we can start over.
@Trekfreek You are absolutely correct that Star Trek 2009 had several plot holes. It seems to me that you prefer movies that tie up all loose ends in a nice bow. I like this too, but not when the main plot is overly cheesy. I didn't like Star Trek IV's main plot. Sure, it's fun to watch and everything from the previous movies tie up at the end, but it was so...not Star Trek. And OOC Spock was amusing...but it felt like I was reading fanfiction. I liked '09's plot, and TMP's plot, better.
@MFLuder77 STAR TREK IV was more Star Trek than II, III, VI, VIII, X, and Especially XI! Star Trek was a means to address social issues and what makes us human. Saving endangered species is an issue touched on in TOS, TAS and TNG several times. What was XI about? Search for God? No. Anti-war/pro-war? No. Societies impact on the individual? No. Self sacrifice? No. >>>? NO NO NO! It's about NOTHING, ZERRO ZIP, BUPKIS. ST XI is more like an episode of Seinfeld than a Star Trek movie.
@Trekfreek I apologize for upsetting you. You are fully entitled to your opinion, and I respect your opinion. I like to discuss Star Trek with fellow fans, even those who view it in a different light, but having a converstion with you seems to prove a difficulty. I will no longer intrude on your life with anymore mention of Star Trek and how I view it and how it is, has been, and always will be, a major part of my life. Good day.
@MFLuder77 You did not upset me. Sorry if I get a little over zealous. But I'm a hard core sci-fi fan. I was only pointing out what made Star Trek the hit it was. I started watching Trek back in 1974. I was 6, I was mesmerized by it. No other show held my attention longer or taught me more. When I was 8 the letter campaign to name the first Space shuttle after the fictional ship grabbed my imagination. I begged my mom to help me with collecting names. Star Trek is in my BLOOD.
@Trekfreek Thank you for your apology. I assure you I'm not here to try to convert you to my opinion on the new Star Trek movie. I know a lot of people don't like it and i honestly understand why. But referring to your growing up with Trek, I wish I had lived in the 70s when TOS became successful in syndication. My father was a child/preteen during that time, and he passed the "addiction" onto me when I finally entered the world in the early 90s. I can't watch most modern TV b/c of Star Trek.
@MFLuder77 That’s great but I feel to truly understand what the great bird of the galaxy was trying to achieve people must read old sci-fi books. Books like Gulliver’s Travels, From the Earth to the Moon, War of the Worlds, Frankenstein, and 20,000 Leagues under the Sea. These books and many others used sci-fi to discuss the human condition. Once I read these books (I was 8) I understood the deeper issues in Star Trek. These books are for everyone regardless of age.
@28217 PS. Before you respond check out my channel and my friends’ channels (Especially Bill’s). Afterwards maybe you will understand what true trek is about.
@28217 PS. Before you respond check out my channel and my friends’ channels (Especially Bill’s). Afterwards maybe you will understand what true trek is about.
The only things that this movie made people think of was either "WOW isn't it perdy?" or "I Want My Money Back!". I challenge ANYONE to prove me wrong! What was the thinking part of this movie, what makes you defend it like your own child? Please confine your remarks to the movie; no lame excuses like "It made lots of money", "it won awards", "JJ Abrams Rocks", or "fuck you". Keep it civilized and clear. Don't be a popinjay when responding.
i never saw this trailer... that's why i was so surprised to see Leonard Nimoy when i watched the movie. i called out "Spoooock!!" at the edge of my seat when i watched the film. it was great! :)
I'm not really a fan of young actors coming along and portraying classic legendary characters... i believe the classic should be left alone. But i do like the young cast in the film, very good :)
@ChelseyCSD After seeing the movie, I realised that if Star Trek was going to survive, they needed something fresh. I was really prepared to hate it, but just before it's release I began seeing reviews from people who had been fans of The Original Series for as long as I had and they were saying to hold opinions and watch it, that I'd be surprised. I was. I really like it.
@LivesForJihad Yeah, but what about the thousands of non trekkers who dont know who James T Kirk is, or casual trekkers who dont know what the 'T' stands for? This Trek is ment to bring more people into the series, not just the old fans.
Think about it. When a cop pulls you over, do you say (pardon the example) "My name is James Tuberius Kirk!" or do you say your first, middle, and last name? Do you even say your name? THis could have been done a lot better!
Perhaps some people don't know what the T stands for. A better way to solve this would be if...James Kirk was an interview with some admiral, and the admiral reads his name from a file? That would look more "in place"
Oh, maybe Kirk has a ego the size of Ohio? Why say 'James T Kirk of the Starship Enterprise'? Do you throw your middle name initial in? It is Kirk, he will win every pissing contest because his dick is at least 6" longer than everyone else's, and he knows it.
@OrokaSempai He says "James T. Kirk" for the same reason the guitar player insists on being called "Yngwie J. Malmsteen" - y'know, to distinguish himself from all the OTHER guys out there named "Yngwie Malmsteen."
great movie, perfect actors, awesome story, love that Leonard Nimoy who play the original Spock was in this movie . to bad the didn't have William Shatner too ;)
I love the casting in this movie, every actor brought out the essence of their characters without it seeming like an imitation of the previous actor's portrayal of them.
Simon Pegg did a great job as Scotty, but I would've liked to have seen Paul McGillion (Carson Beckett from Stargate Atlantis) get that role..
1. beginning of the movie have a ship and uniforms resembled it came from tos then have the time line change when Nero came back in time. Like NG's yesterday's Enterprise
2. Nero look like a Romulan
3. Ray Liotta play Captain Pike.
4. Have the hardware and Enterprise look like TOS.
5. No romance between Spock and Uhura
6. No red animal that chased Kirk and the silly little alien with Scotty.
8. get rid of all the stupid needless special effects and hectic editing
9. slow down this is not fucking ER during an earthquake
10. yeah Spock and Uhura ??? what the hell were they thinking anyway?
11. tell Pine that Kirk was many things but not an irresponsible clown agonizing over and over and over again duh!
12. tell Quinto that no matter what Spock IS NOT a nervous wreck plus fix his hair cut because he looks like an egg while Spock had a perfect head shape
@leebarrett62 "4. Have the hardware and Enterprise look like TOS. "
I think they were aiming for something that looked relevant today. Not that the execution was that great, but jelly bean buttons weren't going to cut it.
@Zenutheduck not so much the interior of the ship but the exterior and the phaser, commicators and tricorders. They looked like toys to me. The least they could've done was to explain that Matt Jefferies was killed on the ship with Kirks father to explain why there was such a drastic change. If they would've done this is the world of Star Wars the fans would've killed the director!
I'm all for the updating of Trek but, they could've done a better job.
this movie has had alot of mixed reactions since it opened...i watched it recently and the special effects were incredible!, but as hard as this is for me to say being a star trek fan the plot seemed very weak and had no substance...it felt like at times that i was watching a comic book movie, infact the highlight of the film for me was the performance of Karl Urban who played "bones"
Yeah the plotting was a little weak, but i thought the characterization was what really drove the movie and made it so good. Every actor was perfectly cast
I agree. In my opinion, I hope they do a second movie that focuses not only on the actual PLOT, but more of the favorite trio- Bones, Spock, and Kirk. The chemistry Deforest Kelly, Leonard Nimoy and William Shatner had together was amazing. I want to see more of that trio!
@RoseGirl1192 I think it would be awesome if Scotty would refit the new enterprise to look a bit more like the classic on the outside of the ship and have the next movie retell a classic episode with a new twist since there has been a timeline change they could completely retool the story.
@leebarrett62 Most definately. I would love to see the Amok Time episode done in part of the next movie. I believe that would be interesting to see how they adapted it. Or Kahn!
Well, i can understand why a lot of hardcore trek fans did not like it. Kirk was a very weak. But i liked the movie cause it told the story how they crew got together on the Enterprise if for nothing else.
it's a good movie for everyone who doesn't want to see a ST movie as it has nothing to do with ST as envisioned by Roddenberry it's typical hollywood cheescrap that wants to appeal to the superficial plebs you can see nothing of the old chemistry that made the original crew so unique instead there's Uhura and Spock kissing Spock behaving as a nervous wreck Kirk like an oh-so-cool troublemaker as if troublemaking itself was cool the movie destroyed everything that was good in TOS I hate it
@sondano - You need to rethink a lot of what you said. You just held a two hour a movie and turned into a sledgehammer that supposedly destroyed everything that was supposed "good" in a show that ran for three years. I watch TOS often, and I saw nothing destroyed in it, so not sure what you're going on about.
This is an honest attempt to breathe new life into it. It's not perfect (The antagonists were very one-dimensional in this movie), but atleast it's not afraid to be daring.
Leonard Nimpy is a Handsome Devil too ! his presence in the movie added weight to the Film and acted as a form of Self narration. His scenes should have been longer to add more depth, seriuosness and weight and explanation as to what further was going on. He is sort of an Obi wan and Moses like Father Figure to the whole Production onscreen and Off. He deserves and his presnece demandsmore importance in the Next Film.
At the end wheer he meets Quinto. i didn't want him to Go! My Hero !
Star Trek 12 should open up with the new Enterprise in Mid Battle with 5 Klingon Warships. Fans love it when they Enterprise is taking a Pounding and Dishing it out even Harder !
Who remembers the TOS episode with the Klingons starting a war and the Organians came...
The Ship was sneak attacked by a Klingon Battle Cruiser. The Enterprise took a surprise pounding , held together nd returned Fire and Blew the Crap out of the Enemy ! let's see what this new ship can do !
There was scene that was cut where he and his brother were cleaning the car, and his step dad is a dick to them, his brother Sam goes off and Jim takes the car.
You actually see his brother in the film, when Kirk shouts "Hey Johnny" it's actually his brother Sam, they just dubbed over it.
There was also a scene where young Kirk confronts his angry step-father over the Corvette incident.
it was a classic 60s car. As kirk ran it off the cliff its supposed to symbolise the a fresh start from the 60s series and in with a new 21st century startrek...i think.
If i ever was a Spocklover for the original Spock, now I love him even more than ever. Nimoy is the absolute best, half this movie was all about Spock and Vulcan, I love it, i'm going to buy 10 copies when it comes out. Ambassador Spock there is definetly no man on this planet earth like you. LOL, that's why his mother Amanda had to find a mate somewhere else, no good men left here.
Live long, and prosper!!
bluesfun 2 months ago
Sylar is spock :[]
VanillaCocaColaRox 5 months ago
i want a green night elf to be my gf
inachu 8 months ago
The Worst Movie ever! Godzilla OF THE 70'S (The obvious rubber suits) were better than this sad excuse of a movie, at least Godzilla was original. This movie ripped off everything from Star Wars through Star Ship Troopers to Flash Gordon.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only things that this movie made people think of was either "WOW isn't it perdy?" or "I Want My Money Back!". I challenge ANYONE to prove me wrong! What was the thinking part of this movie, what makes you defend it like your own child? Please confine your remarks to the movie; no lame excuses like "It made lots of money", "it won awards", "JJ Abrams Rocks", or "fuck you". Keep it civilized and clear. Don't be a popinjay when responding.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek How about the acting. Each character was portrayed perfectly by each actor/ actress. Aside from Chris Pine who still held up his own. The story is great because it was written in a way where you don't have to be a trekkie or watch any other movie to understand it. Anybody could come in and enjoy it fully. I admit the one problem I had with the movie was that the villain's motivation was kinda immature. But that's not what this movie is trying to express.
28217 10 months ago
@Trekfreek It was about character interactions. That was the most important part of the series. And that's the most important part here. They ingeniously incorporated scenes in the story that showed how all of the characters are awesome. You remember how Chekhov is a badass at math. How Sulu can fight. How Smart and clever Aurora is at tracking enemy signals; and how amazing Scotty is at engineering and teleporting. It shows what makes them all special and I thought that was clever
28217 10 months ago
@28217 PS. I also did not need to post over a dozen times (while repeating myself over and over) to make my point. Learn to consolidate your thoughts.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek That's what the story is about. Character development, relationships, and Confrontations. Just like the show, that was the most important clincher. Not the villain. The friendship between Kirk and Bones and the confrontations between Kirk and Spock were amazing. Especially when old Spock came and told him that he was the true captain of the enterprise.
28217 10 months ago
@Trekfreek Don't you get it! The story wasn't about Nero. It was about following Kirk and the other's rise to becoming the Captain and crew of the Enterprise. That's why everyone loves it. :)
28217 10 months ago
@28217 Obviously YOU don't get it. Story telling includes everyone in the movie, EVEN the villain. Also the way they got together was like 90210 not Star Trek, and The way Kirk got his command was like Star Wars on Acid again not at all like Star Trek. The Characters were not the ones from the show, the acting was so bad that if I had directed it I also would have probably used lens flares to trick my audience into thinking it was good (I HATE LENSFLARES!). Also you are not film guru like me.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek Every story needs an antagonist. That was just the token villain or obstacle star trek uses to help the team come closer together. The acting was amazing. All of the actors played perfect younger versions of the crew. You have to realize. This is the beginning. They are much younger then the crew on the series. So it obvious that they all would act more energetic then the 40 year olds on the show. But when it comes to personality, each character was portrayed perfectly.
28217 10 months ago
@28217 "Every story needs an antagonist “Wrong again. "Star Trek IV", "2001", & "Evelyn" did not have an antagonist. Good Antagonists arn't cookie cutter. Real ST Antagonists are complex characters (Kahn, Nomad, Q, etc...) "each character was portrayed perfectly." They were no ware near like the original characters, and I seen better acting in a mellow drama play! Also it’s not the beginning, To see the real beginning watch Star Trek Origins: Kirk. PS I'm 43 & still can out run any 18 year old.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek All star trek stories. (The good ones) focused on the characters relationships more then the villain. Everyone says the characters were portrayed amazingly except you. I knew it. I know your type. You claim to open to be proven wrong but that's a lie. I responded telling you what the story was about. And then all you said back to me was that the villain sucked. I told you how the characters were portrayed perfectly. And then all you said was the characters sucked.
28217 10 months ago
@28217 GO and watch the real Star Trek and compare the characters to the ones in the new movie. If you have a sharp eye and an open mind (like you claim to have) then you will see that the characters in the new movie don't match the ones in the original series (or even in the fan show Phase II). I gave you8 plenty of reasons why the Villain + the acting + the Story + the directing + the dialog + the characters “Sucked". But you have not given me one logical reason why this movie was good.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek Your not given me any reasons other then saying how they suck or how bad it is. (Like that says something.) Your not willing to have a decent argument. You just want to be right. And the moment you said the acting was terrible you proved that. Karl Urban portrayed a young bones near perfectly and was outrageous. Even other 2009 Star Trek haters have the decency to admit that Zach did a great job at Spock. Give me real retorts aside from they suck. Give me examples from the film
28217 10 months ago
Respond to this video...And P.S. Arnold Schwarzenegger can kick any kids ass. That doesn't mean he'll feel inclined to do it as opposed to 30 years ago where would run jump snap limbs and crush spines. It doesn't take a genius to know when you become older you become more mellow and calm. It doesn't mean you don't have the capability to do high energy things. You just can't act that way all the time like the young people in this movie. You see....explanation
28217 10 months ago
@28217 Wrong again! Despite what you might read in the tabloids Arnold Schwarzenegger never EVER wanted to, or did, "run jump snap limbs and crush spines" in real life and he still would do all that on screen today if given the right kind of script. He did not "mellow" he just decided to do something more important than make movies. And I can, and do, act hyper all the time because I want to. The actors in this movie don’t; half the time I think they are on valium.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Trekfreek Omg!. Your so stupid. lol. Im not talking about conscious control. I never once said that a 40 year old is incapable of jumping about. If they want to, I'm sure they can. But they won't be able to keep it up. Look at all of Arnold's movies in the 90's. Still a badass. But barely any running or jumping. Just walking around slowly and looking cool. And I can't believe someone's actually debating the fact that a 40 year old won't have as much stamina as a 20 year old.
28217 10 months ago
@28217."But they won't be able to keep it up" You want to put you money where you little bratty mouth is? I challenge you to find any 40 year old that is his ideal weight and health for that age and challenge him to a physical and mental contest. I guarantee he would clean your clock and eat crow! I know 60 year olds who could last 30-60 minutes longer than any 20 year old; AGE MEANS NOTHING kid. Some day you will understand that.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek You just proved how remedial you are. "I know 60 year olds who could last longer then a 20 year old" You can always find someone that breaks the curve. But there's no way an average 43 year old has as much stamina as a 23 year old. Wow. It's insane that I'm actually arguing this. You're at your physical prime at 20. More then half of my yr 40 patients has Chronic Fatigue as a symptom. It's not possible for someone under the age of 25 to have chronic failure. I can't believe this
28217 10 months ago
@28217 Patients? What are you a Doctor of? Chronic fatigue is just a symptom of a greater issue, usually high stress. This is common among 40 year olds not due to loss of physical ability but because of emotional stress from rising families, work, & midlife blues. This can be overcome with therapy & spiritual up lifting such as renewing confidence & helping them to see what they have instead of what was lost. PS. Believe it or Not; I don't care.
BondFreek 10 months ago
@BondFreek I'm a neurologist. I was just explaining to Trek Freek how young adults (BSL) and stamina are higher than anyone elses. I didnt mean for anyone else too get wrapped up into this. And Chronic Failure is a symptom not a diagnosis. And the most common reason for it is depression. That at least is what I was taught. This is weird though. Are you a Neurologist as well? If you are, please tell me the author of the Textbook of Nervous System book where you learned this from. Interesting
28217 10 months ago
@28217 That's just what I said. "fatigue is just a symptom of a greater issue, usually high stress". I'm a student of psychology, chemistry, philosophy, statistics, physics, quantum mechanics, and Accounting. I learned everything I know about the human brain from my mentor the psychiatrist Dr. Copland, and 7 years of psychology classes. Statisticly speeking, there is no proof that age by its self makes people slow down.
BondFreek 10 months ago
@BondFreek Wow! Well I can't argue with someone with that kind of Resume....except High Stress defiantly is a symptom, not a diagnosis. Chronic failure does cannot result in stress. That dosent make any sense. Its the opposite if anything. When you age your metabolism drops, (bsl) rises, and due to your blood vessels being overused, you don't vasodilate and absorb nutrients. Muscle tissue wears. And your heart weakens because of blood sugar resulting in heart defects such as CF
28217 10 months ago
@28217 As a philologist I disagree. Manny physical problems can be produced by high stress. Many things in life can be caused by stress and quite often stress is self inflected. Also low metabolism, high blood pressure, lack of vasodilator, tissue wear, weak hart ect... are a result of long term abuse of the body not age. Also for a doctor, your spelling of medical terms is very poor.
BondFreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek Thats what it is. Stamina which you tend to relieve yourself of through time. The fact that your arguing a solid fact like this isn't because you don't believe it. You just want to make yourself seem right for not liking this movie. Without giving any solid facts about its problem as a movie. A guy who want's to be right will say anything to prove his point. Give me a specific plot hole in the movie. And I will actually admit that I was wrong. Which is more anyone can about u.
28217 10 months ago
@28217 here I go again! Plot hole # 1 Red matter Makes black holes that suck ships into the past but destroys planets & damaged ships How is it possible? Plot hole # 2, what was Nero doing for 25 years? Plot hole # 3 why did Nero's crew stick around instead of running off to warn Romulus of the impending doom? Plot hole # 4 What happened to Kirk's punishment for cheating? Is that enough? PS. I will always admit when I’m wrong if proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Unlike you I'm more polite.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
@Trekfreek Hey I was being polite when I first commented on what it was about. You responded on how I "Obviously don't get it" and how "I'm not a film guru like you", maximizing yourself while minimizing me. I never said I was film guru or better than you or called you any names at first. You were'nt polite. Now I would love to have a polite debate with you. That being said, you were acting a jerk to me and a just retaliated. Now I'm sorry for all I said and hopefully we can start over.
28217 10 months ago
@Trekfreek You are absolutely correct that Star Trek 2009 had several plot holes. It seems to me that you prefer movies that tie up all loose ends in a nice bow. I like this too, but not when the main plot is overly cheesy. I didn't like Star Trek IV's main plot. Sure, it's fun to watch and everything from the previous movies tie up at the end, but it was so...not Star Trek. And OOC Spock was amusing...but it felt like I was reading fanfiction. I liked '09's plot, and TMP's plot, better.
MFLuder77 6 months ago
@MFLuder77 STAR TREK IV was more Star Trek than II, III, VI, VIII, X, and Especially XI! Star Trek was a means to address social issues and what makes us human. Saving endangered species is an issue touched on in TOS, TAS and TNG several times. What was XI about? Search for God? No. Anti-war/pro-war? No. Societies impact on the individual? No. Self sacrifice? No. >>>? NO NO NO! It's about NOTHING, ZERRO ZIP, BUPKIS. ST XI is more like an episode of Seinfeld than a Star Trek movie.
Trekfreek 6 months ago
@Trekfreek I apologize for upsetting you. You are fully entitled to your opinion, and I respect your opinion. I like to discuss Star Trek with fellow fans, even those who view it in a different light, but having a converstion with you seems to prove a difficulty. I will no longer intrude on your life with anymore mention of Star Trek and how I view it and how it is, has been, and always will be, a major part of my life. Good day.
MFLuder77 6 months ago
Comment removed
Trekfreek 6 months ago
@MFLuder77 You did not upset me. Sorry if I get a little over zealous. But I'm a hard core sci-fi fan. I was only pointing out what made Star Trek the hit it was. I started watching Trek back in 1974. I was 6, I was mesmerized by it. No other show held my attention longer or taught me more. When I was 8 the letter campaign to name the first Space shuttle after the fictional ship grabbed my imagination. I begged my mom to help me with collecting names. Star Trek is in my BLOOD.
Trekfreek 6 months ago
@Trekfreek Thank you for your apology. I assure you I'm not here to try to convert you to my opinion on the new Star Trek movie. I know a lot of people don't like it and i honestly understand why. But referring to your growing up with Trek, I wish I had lived in the 70s when TOS became successful in syndication. My father was a child/preteen during that time, and he passed the "addiction" onto me when I finally entered the world in the early 90s. I can't watch most modern TV b/c of Star Trek.
MFLuder77 6 months ago
@MFLuder77 That’s great but I feel to truly understand what the great bird of the galaxy was trying to achieve people must read old sci-fi books. Books like Gulliver’s Travels, From the Earth to the Moon, War of the Worlds, Frankenstein, and 20,000 Leagues under the Sea. These books and many others used sci-fi to discuss the human condition. Once I read these books (I was 8) I understood the deeper issues in Star Trek. These books are for everyone regardless of age.
Trekfreek 6 months ago
@28217 PS. Before you respond check out my channel and my friends’ channels (Especially Bill’s). Afterwards maybe you will understand what true trek is about.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@28217 PS. Before you respond check out my channel and my friends’ channels (Especially Bill’s). Afterwards maybe you will understand what true trek is about.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The only things that this movie made people think of was either "WOW isn't it perdy?" or "I Want My Money Back!". I challenge ANYONE to prove me wrong! What was the thinking part of this movie, what makes you defend it like your own child? Please confine your remarks to the movie; no lame excuses like "It made lots of money", "it won awards", "JJ Abrams Rocks", or "fuck you". Keep it civilized and clear. Don't be a popinjay when responding.
Trekfreek 10 months ago
Why do all recent films have to have that "punching" music?
slendersail 1 year ago
Spoooock The leyend!
TremendoGallo 1 year ago
They should give STNG the same treatment...It could be awesome.
WiseGuy5674 1 year ago
May STAR TREK Live Long and Prosper!
VulcanJedi1701 1 year ago
zachary quinto owned that shit
luk3mz 1 year ago
i never saw this trailer... that's why i was so surprised to see Leonard Nimoy when i watched the movie. i called out "Spoooock!!" at the edge of my seat when i watched the film. it was great! :)
rickythekid 1 year ago
Leonard Nimoy is the only real true Spock. Positive. The only.
dadaewaemmerich 1 year ago 9
I love bones. what a cutie!!! it is kick ass movie!
joseyposie 1 year ago
Leonard Nimoy at the end!!!!!!!!!! XD
ChelseyCSD 1 year ago 7
I'm not really a fan of young actors coming along and portraying classic legendary characters... i believe the classic should be left alone. But i do like the young cast in the film, very good :)
ChelseyCSD 1 year ago
@ChelseyCSD After seeing the movie, I realised that if Star Trek was going to survive, they needed something fresh. I was really prepared to hate it, but just before it's release I began seeing reviews from people who had been fans of The Original Series for as long as I had and they were saying to hold opinions and watch it, that I'd be surprised. I was. I really like it.
jtkirkfan2002 1 year ago
He says his full name for dramatic effect. Besides, he's Kirk.
AMVlurver 1 year ago 3
@AMVlurver "Because he's Kirk." LOL. Can't really describe it any better than that. :)
otdtyh 1 year ago 2
the movie - can be seen online for free n @ MOOV ZON . COM search the above link on google
refugiaarmourst 1 year ago
At the beginning...that kid was stupid. He says his full name? We are not stupid...we know who Jim Kirk is.
LivesForJihad 2 years ago
@LivesForJihad Yeah, but what about the thousands of non trekkers who dont know who James T Kirk is, or casual trekkers who dont know what the 'T' stands for? This Trek is ment to bring more people into the series, not just the old fans.
OrokaSempai 2 years ago 2
But it was kinda...out of place.
Think about it. When a cop pulls you over, do you say (pardon the example) "My name is James Tuberius Kirk!" or do you say your first, middle, and last name? Do you even say your name? THis could have been done a lot better!
Perhaps some people don't know what the T stands for. A better way to solve this would be if...James Kirk was an interview with some admiral, and the admiral reads his name from a file? That would look more "in place"
LivesForJihad 2 years ago
Oh, maybe Kirk has a ego the size of Ohio? Why say 'James T Kirk of the Starship Enterprise'? Do you throw your middle name initial in? It is Kirk, he will win every pissing contest because his dick is at least 6" longer than everyone else's, and he knows it.
OrokaSempai 2 years ago
@OrokaSempai You mean the size of Iowa don't you? :)))))
mrtrek64 1 year ago
@OrokaSempai He says "James T. Kirk" for the same reason the guitar player insists on being called "Yngwie J. Malmsteen" - y'know, to distinguish himself from all the OTHER guys out there named "Yngwie Malmsteen."
FreedomZealot 1 year ago
that is no star trek.
Andreas1986xyz 2 years ago
Yeah, Paul played the guy who was assigning people to ships.
silentshadow1989 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
great movie, perfect actors, awesome story, love that Leonard Nimoy who play the original Spock was in this movie . to bad the didn't have William Shatner too ;)
pulsare21 2 years ago
I love the casting in this movie, every actor brought out the essence of their characters without it seeming like an imitation of the previous actor's portrayal of them.
Simon Pegg did a great job as Scotty, but I would've liked to have seen Paul McGillion (Carson Beckett from Stargate Atlantis) get that role..
silentshadow1989 2 years ago 5
@silentshadow1989 Paul is in the film, btw. Just not as Scotty tho. Did you catch which character he was?
Zenutheduck 2 years ago
Omg the original spock is in this!!! :O
cathwon 2 years ago
I have seen tis movie 5x and i have to say i like this movie i hope they make it bigger and better than this one
philipstephenbird 2 years ago
Best movie of 2009!
Firefox13A 2 years ago 5
look guys this movie was one of 2009's best
the reason this film was different was because it was about the crew coming together.
CaptainRon0001 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what is music at 1:18???
KenpachiRules84 2 years ago
William Bell sighting 1:48
kjpdqpb 2 years ago
I would've like to seen
1. beginning of the movie have a ship and uniforms resembled it came from tos then have the time line change when Nero came back in time. Like NG's yesterday's Enterprise
2. Nero look like a Romulan
3. Ray Liotta play Captain Pike.
4. Have the hardware and Enterprise look like TOS.
5. No romance between Spock and Uhura
6. No red animal that chased Kirk and the silly little alien with Scotty.
7. Get a better actor to play Scott
leebarrett62 2 years ago
8. get rid of all the stupid needless special effects and hectic editing
9. slow down this is not fucking ER during an earthquake
10. yeah Spock and Uhura ??? what the hell were they thinking anyway?
11. tell Pine that Kirk was many things but not an irresponsible clown agonizing over and over and over again duh!
12. tell Quinto that no matter what Spock IS NOT a nervous wreck plus fix his hair cut because he looks like an egg while Spock had a perfect head shape
sondano 2 years ago
@leebarrett62 "4. Have the hardware and Enterprise look like TOS. "
I think they were aiming for something that looked relevant today. Not that the execution was that great, but jelly bean buttons weren't going to cut it.
Zenutheduck 2 years ago
@Zenutheduck not so much the interior of the ship but the exterior and the phaser, commicators and tricorders. They looked like toys to me. The least they could've done was to explain that Matt Jefferies was killed on the ship with Kirks father to explain why there was such a drastic change. If they would've done this is the world of Star Wars the fans would've killed the director!
I'm all for the updating of Trek but, they could've done a better job.
leebarrett62 2 years ago
"I AM SPOCK"
"BULLSHIT!"
Canadiack 2 years ago
whoever doesn't like it. you are wrong. its a grea tmovie
ChristopherYoungKim 2 years ago
I even hate the trailer. Kirk as crash kid is the biggest shit.
IlluminationGlobal 2 years ago 2
So what's the first thing they do? Destroy a classic.
Unit430 2 years ago
thats right the new movie is shit
coolerboy1102 2 years ago
Nope.
Zenutheduck 2 years ago
this movie has had alot of mixed reactions since it opened...i watched it recently and the special effects were incredible!, but as hard as this is for me to say being a star trek fan the plot seemed very weak and had no substance...it felt like at times that i was watching a comic book movie, infact the highlight of the film for me was the performance of Karl Urban who played "bones"
kiely456 2 years ago
Yeah the plotting was a little weak, but i thought the characterization was what really drove the movie and made it so good. Every actor was perfectly cast
travi360 2 years ago 2
I agree. In my opinion, I hope they do a second movie that focuses not only on the actual PLOT, but more of the favorite trio- Bones, Spock, and Kirk. The chemistry Deforest Kelly, Leonard Nimoy and William Shatner had together was amazing. I want to see more of that trio!
RoseGirl1192 2 years ago
@RoseGirl1192 Amen!
leebarrett62 2 years ago
@RoseGirl1192 I think it would be awesome if Scotty would refit the new enterprise to look a bit more like the classic on the outside of the ship and have the next movie retell a classic episode with a new twist since there has been a timeline change they could completely retool the story.
leebarrett62 2 years ago 2
how bout the original meeting between the crew and kahn.
travchap4 2 years ago
that would work but, I was thinking about something they haven't revisited before like Harry Mudd or the Corbomite maneuver.
leebarrett62 2 years ago
@leebarrett62 Most definately. I would love to see the Amok Time episode done in part of the next movie. I believe that would be interesting to see how they adapted it. Or Kahn!
RoseGirl1192 2 years ago
@RoseGirl1192 that chemistry cannot be replicated
sondano 2 years ago
I don't deny that at all. What those three had was magic. It can NEVER be replicated. I just like the new chemistry for the new guys too.
RoseGirl1192 2 years ago
What? I don't think an average rotten tomato rating of 96% can be classed as mixed reaction lol :-)
Kihotay 2 years ago
"this movie has had alot of mixed reactions since it opened..."
Yep. A lot of people liked it, some people loved, some people really loved it, and only a few didn't like it. Very mixed ;)
Zenutheduck 2 years ago
Well, i can understand why a lot of hardcore trek fans did not like it. Kirk was a very weak. But i liked the movie cause it told the story how they crew got together on the Enterprise if for nothing else.
Oh and Spock rocked.
rowland2110 2 years ago
Only a few didn't like it. It's actually ranked rather highly on Trek sites.
Zenutheduck 2 years ago
except Spock was not Spock it was Quinto playing a character that was in many sense the opposite of Nimoy's brillliant and calm Spock
sondano 2 years ago
it's a good movie for everyone who doesn't want to see a ST movie as it has nothing to do with ST as envisioned by Roddenberry it's typical hollywood cheescrap that wants to appeal to the superficial plebs you can see nothing of the old chemistry that made the original crew so unique instead there's Uhura and Spock kissing Spock behaving as a nervous wreck Kirk like an oh-so-cool troublemaker as if troublemaking itself was cool the movie destroyed everything that was good in TOS I hate it
sondano 2 years ago
@sondano - You need to rethink a lot of what you said. You just held a two hour a movie and turned into a sledgehammer that supposedly destroyed everything that was supposed "good" in a show that ran for three years. I watch TOS often, and I saw nothing destroyed in it, so not sure what you're going on about.
Zenutheduck 2 years ago
OK I rephrase it: TOS rulez while Star Trek 2009 sucks
sondano 2 years ago
@sondano In my opinion suck is a strong word. I believe it was a very good movie but, it could've been better.
leebarrett62 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a piss poor excuse for a Star Trek film. If this is the direction JJ Abrams is taking this series, then I'm outta' here!
I grew up with Star Trek and have been a fan since the beginning. This film just killed it for me.
Star Trek: 1966-2009. RIP.
Actionguy1 2 years ago
The series died with Star Trek Nemesis.
This is an honest attempt to breathe new life into it. It's not perfect (The antagonists were very one-dimensional in this movie), but atleast it's not afraid to be daring.
niuchemist 2 years ago
Leonard Nimpy is a Handsome Devil too ! his presence in the movie added weight to the Film and acted as a form of Self narration. His scenes should have been longer to add more depth, seriuosness and weight and explanation as to what further was going on. He is sort of an Obi wan and Moses like Father Figure to the whole Production onscreen and Off. He deserves and his presnece demandsmore importance in the Next Film.
At the end wheer he meets Quinto. i didn't want him to Go! My Hero !
Roadracer987654321 2 years ago 3
Star Trek 12 should open up with the new Enterprise in Mid Battle with 5 Klingon Warships. Fans love it when they Enterprise is taking a Pounding and Dishing it out even Harder !
Who remembers the TOS episode with the Klingons starting a war and the Organians came...
The Ship was sneak attacked by a Klingon Battle Cruiser. The Enterprise took a surprise pounding , held together nd returned Fire and Blew the Crap out of the Enemy ! let's see what this new ship can do !
Roadracer987654321 2 years ago
who knows where i can find the part where theres a russian guy with a japanese guy on ship???
Gloc998 2 years ago
I liked this movie, but even I think that the opening with the car was stupid.
punkkillah1288 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Terrible movie. It's an insult to Trek.
Danny77uk 2 years ago
oh shut up you twit it is the same chracters you jerk
luigi19987 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
PUT MY COMMENT DOWN HERE.
silveragent111 2 years ago
I went to the movie theater in Japan.
I will buy BD.
siskoiris 2 years ago
what?! you eat babies?!
im disturbed :x
AlexOoiue 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I eat babies.
drockjr 2 years ago
YAY!......
waffleownage 2 years ago
I have been and always shall be your friend.
Spectator411994 2 years ago 2
I say this to my best friend weekly. It warms our hearts. Jim. Your name is Jim.
RoseGirl1192 2 years ago
I see Star Trek 2 coming soon. This new Star Trek is fantastic.
Topazman12 2 years ago 3
I HOPE SO! I really do, if they don't i'm gonna be completly ticked haha
TheCityISAtWar111 2 years ago
I watched this movie twice in theaters.
whoaamerica 2 years ago 2
Just bought the box set of Star Trek 2.3 & 4 on Blu-Ray.
KAHN!!!!
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago 12
@Avatarblackwolf sorry mate you've got that slightly wrong..it's KAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHN!!!!!!!!!!! :-D
wolfbladedeathtrap1 1 year ago
@wolfbladedeathtrap1 LOL! Thanks!
Avatarblackwolf 1 year ago
I still get goose bumps everytime I watch this.
dwhorrocks 2 years ago 16
me too.
silveragent111 2 years ago
On Blu-Ray 11.17.09
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago 3
Thanks for the info!
davidwebb14 2 years ago
seriously?????????????????? really! omg!!!!!!!!
LaurieLuva96 2 years ago
the movies just too awesome.
silveragent111 2 years ago
You can see Leonard Nimoy's name at 2:07. He makes the best Spok.
tonimtions 2 years ago 7
Actually, the car was George Kirk's, and Jim's wicked stepdad was going to sell it, so Jim decided to destroy it rather than let it get sold.
herselftis 2 years ago
lol @ wicked stepdad. Too bad we never got to see him.
AEigner 2 years ago
Actually, the car belonged to his step father.
There was scene that was cut where he and his brother were cleaning the car, and his step dad is a dick to them, his brother Sam goes off and Jim takes the car.
You actually see his brother in the film, when Kirk shouts "Hey Johnny" it's actually his brother Sam, they just dubbed over it.
There was also a scene where young Kirk confronts his angry step-father over the Corvette incident.
jameslove888 2 years ago
I didn't know kirk's mother remarried. I thought it was his uncle or something.
hoppers001 2 years ago
Yeah!!! Probably the best star trek movie (and there were a quite a few of good star trek movies!). The franchise alive and kicking!!
panathatube 2 years ago
not really i know someone who loved the movie and actually understand it right off the bat because hello there starting from why it all happen ^_^
bobbleheadcollection 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I am an old jew, and like a young jew, I will do next to any crap media for money.
MalignantRacist 2 years ago
Cars in a star trek movie...
MalignantRacist 2 years ago 2
it was a classic 60s car. As kirk ran it off the cliff its supposed to symbolise the a fresh start from the 60s series and in with a new 21st century startrek...i think.
badgerboyUK 2 years ago 7
hmm. i like that idea.
dingoesatemycamera 2 years ago
COOL point of view
carlofos 2 years ago
I think it was also to signify that kirk's rebellious attitude started at a young age
frankssama 2 years ago
haha. not just a car. but a car chase(ish).. with the beastie boys.
oh j.j., only you could have figure out a way to fit the beastie boys into a star trek movie.
dingoesatemycamera 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
probably the cheesest star trek movie I have seen...If you didnt know the charactors before hand you would be very confused
rad4life1 2 years ago
probably the best movie i have ever seen. ...also kind of have the hugest crush on Spock EVER.
superskittle86 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I LOVE IT!!!!! go here mmmfreemovies[dot]com to download all the movies you want
YrEtasy 2 years ago
I saw this movie last month, man, McCoy was way too dramatic in the beginning.
griffin1246 2 years ago 2
Spock is so awsome! lol everyone i know things kirk is hott. 0.o
chicken4metoo 2 years ago
Jaw Drop --- Spock!!! the original!!!
Faustina87 2 years ago
GO SPOCK! Leonard Nimoy rocks
PepulzGuys 2 years ago 6
the movie was set up so that they could make more
Sodaboy1223 2 years ago
You think?
tiburonlxiv 2 years ago 3
They're already working on the script for the next movie.
ctapps 2 years ago 3
You think?
tiburonlxiv 2 years ago
yes i think
dbennett2007 2 years ago
Spock is hot and so is Kirk
emmamallay 2 years ago 2
It's sometimes hard to decide who's hotter!
BeachofDreams 2 years ago
yea i know i think i like Spock a bit more (just my opinion)
emmamallay 2 years ago 3
yea True that. Zachary Quinto is the shit!
jeremyHOJ 2 years ago
They're both pretty cute, but I think Chekov is hotter.
MarissaKathryn1 2 years ago
That millisecond shown at 1:37 of two guys in masks wasn't in the movie...
lukebaggins 2 years ago
i just saw this and it was absolutly AMAZING! something that trekkies (that'd be me) and normal people can both enjoy.
srhpirate2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Saw the movie, and it's MAGNIFICENT!!!!
vindom08 2 years ago
I went to the premier, thought it was the best ever. They did a really good job. Spok was especially good.
I'm going to see it again :/
blufraser 2 years ago
McDonalds must love you.
orenjiotoku 2 years ago
Spock is my idol, not gonna lie.
NIMOY FOREVER :)
Keep 'em coming Quinto!!
differentmoods15 2 years ago 5
Saw it at the IMAX in Dallas, TX last night!!! I frigging loved it!!!
can't wait for them to fix all the changes that the initial black hole caused!!!
mll1206 2 years ago
man you are so lucky, I wish I could do that right now
Slimer2x3 2 years ago
Ooh ooh, I want to see it, I want to take me there. Love my Trek
buryitdeep 2 years ago
If i ever was a Spocklover for the original Spock, now I love him even more than ever. Nimoy is the absolute best, half this movie was all about Spock and Vulcan, I love it, i'm going to buy 10 copies when it comes out. Ambassador Spock there is definetly no man on this planet earth like you. LOL, that's why his mother Amanda had to find a mate somewhere else, no good men left here.
melaniesales 2 years ago 2
I'd like to see Leonard Nimoy as Dr. Morbius in a remake of Forbidden Planet ^.^
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
ok, who do you guys (well girls) think is hotter, KURK, or SPOCK? i will count the votes and post them here. but i need your help, every vote counts
smech131 2 years ago
Buckle up is right! Saw it at the IMAX on Saturday and what a ride!
shibaweb 2 years ago
So it Sunday night, (not in IMAX) great movie
Avatarblackwolf 2 years ago
Nice movie :)
hwuanghu 2 years ago
eh, I'll wait for the torrent
macaighann 2 years ago
Dude! Kirk is HOT!
KCTitans 2 years ago