Is it at all feasible to regard all the precise geometry, functioning and movement of the universe as the outcome of matter in its ignorance?
When so much planning, thought and precision are needed for man to perform such a task, are not the subtlety, exactitude and orderliness observable in the world a proof of origination deriving from the intelligence, creative planning and far-reaching wisdom of the creator?
Question for the board. Secretariat had a mutant heart, 22 lbs. vs. avg. 8 lb. heart for a thoroughbred horse. His heart allowed him to run faster than any horse in known history. Arguably his mutation was good. None of his offspring had extra large hearts. Why was the mutation for an extra large heart not selected and passed to his offspring? That is how natural selection is supposed to work, right?
@RespectMyHate Natural selection "started" the very moment the first self-replicating DNA(or RNA) arose. How life came to exist from non-life is another topic (abiogenesis).
natural selection selects, and its using existing material. its not speciation and never changes into anything but its kind. speciation never has happened or been observed anywhere. these secular humanists want to confuse these 2 seperate topics
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why is it that evolutionists are worrying about global warming? Isn't this just their own theory being demonstrated. What are they worried about? Wouldn't our offspring just adapt? It's funny how the people that are urging this global warming so let's be green agenda usually deny creation. Where does the adaptation of species come into play in this situation? If it has already been happening,(evolution), won't it just happen again? I don't believe in wasting our future. I just realize design.
Please tell me you are this stupid. We worry about climate change for the same reason we worry about hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, earthquakes, disease, or any other natural problem, because it effects us.
Evolution is happening and will continue to happen as it has for the last hundreds of millions of years. Why would this be hard to understand?
P.S. if there was creator they are piss poor at their job by the way, but as there is no evidence for design we are lucky.
We are worried about a mass extinction and major ecosystem changes. It takes millions of years to reach the same level of genetic diversity that we have today. Many species have died since humans have covered the globe. Many animals died from climate change but many died from human influences. If there is major drought, then how will we feed the ever growing population?
It depends on how fast the environment is changing and how extensive the changes are. Organisms might be able to adapt to a warmer climate for instance. Though if changes are too extensive, it may rub general living conditions, making the planet uninhabitable (if we stretch it far). Also, if it happens too fast, life won't be able to adapt. Evolution is not a very rapid process. Global warming is more compareable to a nature disaster rather than a slow change of the environment.
JUST THINK ABOUT RANDOM ORGANIZATION! THAT"S IT! What about the parents who have black hair, and the kid comes out with blonde hair, and keeps blonde hair throughout their lifetime. Can You point out some traits you have that are of adaptation. I guess it's time cows and chickens adapt the same way everybody else did. Come on random selection save us from being on the dinner plate is what they are probably saying. I guess random selection is sure being randomly selective to them.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Why do the evolution videos always show the same examples. Are they afraid to reveal something that might create questions among evolutionists? As I have said before, evolutionists are only surface feeders. By the way I am not joking. Why don't they show the evolution of cattle? HMMMMMMM!
o, lets see... BECAUSE WE DIRECTLY INFLUENCED THE SPECIATION OF MODERN DOEMSTIC CATTLE U DUMBARSE! we already have traced th origion of the bovine species. And we so called "evolutionists" dont use the same example, because we have all of the biological world to be used as evidence.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You think it is evidence. Stop surface feeding and you will actually see design. I was just using cattle to almost halfways sound silly. Also how dare I mistake you for an evolutionist. Please forgive me!
lol, o im sorry, soooo, the beauty of say, malaria, is the design of a loving god.... HAHAHAHAHAHA, u creationists crack me up. Heres a question for yah, u believe in gravity right? You no thats JUSt a thoery.... that make u a gravatanionist? lol, now do u see how STUPID u r for using the term Evilutionist
lol, so yout takin a stab at internet slurs and shortened terms? im sorry, but u didnt answer my question with gravity... is that ebcause u cant find a creationist site with the answer for u... lol fundy
"lul wat?!" what the hell is random selection? :) They cover in this exact video what natural selection is and how it operates and you still got the concept so wrong that you can think its a random process :)
The Manifestations of God in Nature!
Is it at all feasible to regard all the precise geometry, functioning and movement of the universe as the outcome of matter in its ignorance?
When so much planning, thought and precision are needed for man to perform such a task, are not the subtlety, exactitude and orderliness observable in the world a proof of origination deriving from the intelligence, creative planning and far-reaching wisdom of the creator?
1tabligh 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Question for the board. Secretariat had a mutant heart, 22 lbs. vs. avg. 8 lb. heart for a thoroughbred horse. His heart allowed him to run faster than any horse in known history. Arguably his mutation was good. None of his offspring had extra large hearts. Why was the mutation for an extra large heart not selected and passed to his offspring? That is how natural selection is supposed to work, right?
achilles197474 9 months ago
When did evolution start? At the very start of the very first life form?
RespectMyHate 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate Yes.
billite 1 year ago
@RespectMyHate Natural selection "started" the very moment the first self-replicating DNA(or RNA) arose. How life came to exist from non-life is another topic (abiogenesis).
TheYipedo 10 months ago
natural selection selects, and its using existing material. its not speciation and never changes into anything but its kind. speciation never has happened or been observed anywhere. these secular humanists want to confuse these 2 seperate topics
shinesthrudarain 1 year ago
obviously written by you daughter!!!
shoepebble 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why is it that evolutionists are worrying about global warming? Isn't this just their own theory being demonstrated. What are they worried about? Wouldn't our offspring just adapt? It's funny how the people that are urging this global warming so let's be green agenda usually deny creation. Where does the adaptation of species come into play in this situation? If it has already been happening,(evolution), won't it just happen again? I don't believe in wasting our future. I just realize design.
shoepebble 2 years ago
*facepalm*
Please tell me you are this stupid. We worry about climate change for the same reason we worry about hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, earthquakes, disease, or any other natural problem, because it effects us.
Evolution is happening and will continue to happen as it has for the last hundreds of millions of years. Why would this be hard to understand?
P.S. if there was creator they are piss poor at their job by the way, but as there is no evidence for design we are lucky.
Looking4Coffee 2 years ago 8
We are worried about a mass extinction and major ecosystem changes. It takes millions of years to reach the same level of genetic diversity that we have today. Many species have died since humans have covered the globe. Many animals died from climate change but many died from human influences. If there is major drought, then how will we feed the ever growing population?
lesouder2222 2 years ago 2
It depends on how fast the environment is changing and how extensive the changes are. Organisms might be able to adapt to a warmer climate for instance. Though if changes are too extensive, it may rub general living conditions, making the planet uninhabitable (if we stretch it far). Also, if it happens too fast, life won't be able to adapt. Evolution is not a very rapid process. Global warming is more compareable to a nature disaster rather than a slow change of the environment.
Varimedes 2 years ago
Comment removed
antiZionizier 2 years ago
umm.. you're a moron.
verzen 2 years ago 7
No it's not. I don't really see why it should be. You're confusing evolution with... well, rolling a barrel down the hill.
Varimedes 2 years ago
No it isn't Nice strawman jackass.
sabertooth1980 2 years ago
JUST THINK ABOUT RANDOM ORGANIZATION! THAT"S IT! What about the parents who have black hair, and the kid comes out with blonde hair, and keeps blonde hair throughout their lifetime. Can You point out some traits you have that are of adaptation. I guess it's time cows and chickens adapt the same way everybody else did. Come on random selection save us from being on the dinner plate is what they are probably saying. I guess random selection is sure being randomly selective to them.
shoepebble 3 years ago
... your joking right?
lordbyrne 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why do the evolution videos always show the same examples. Are they afraid to reveal something that might create questions among evolutionists? As I have said before, evolutionists are only surface feeders. By the way I am not joking. Why don't they show the evolution of cattle? HMMMMMMM!
shoepebble 3 years ago
o, lets see... BECAUSE WE DIRECTLY INFLUENCED THE SPECIATION OF MODERN DOEMSTIC CATTLE U DUMBARSE! we already have traced th origion of the bovine species. And we so called "evolutionists" dont use the same example, because we have all of the biological world to be used as evidence.
lordbyrne 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You think it is evidence. Stop surface feeding and you will actually see design. I was just using cattle to almost halfways sound silly. Also how dare I mistake you for an evolutionist. Please forgive me!
shoepebble 3 years ago
lol, o im sorry, soooo, the beauty of say, malaria, is the design of a loving god.... HAHAHAHAHAHA, u creationists crack me up. Heres a question for yah, u believe in gravity right? You no thats JUSt a thoery.... that make u a gravatanionist? lol, now do u see how STUPID u r for using the term Evilutionist
lordbyrne 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Try proofreading before you press Post Comment. But I will just leave you where you are at.
shoepebble 3 years ago
lol, so yout takin a stab at internet slurs and shortened terms? im sorry, but u didnt answer my question with gravity... is that ebcause u cant find a creationist site with the answer for u... lol fundy
lordbyrne 3 years ago 4
"lul wat?!" what the hell is random selection? :) They cover in this exact video what natural selection is and how it operates and you still got the concept so wrong that you can think its a random process :)
Neeboopsh 2 years ago
How come people just cant accept the fact of evolution. yeah it maybe a theory but its better than that creationist bullshit. props for the vid!
MrMuayTha1 3 years ago 3