Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Mr Macintyre looks and sounds exactly like the dour Catholic philosopher I already imagined him to be.

  • Thanks! I can't believe I've actually seen and heard MacIntyre himself ... a tinge of a Scottish accent too!

  • Great lecture, very enjoyable.

  • "To excel as a contemporary academic philosopher is a matter of the quality of one's analytic and argumentative skills"...If only this statement were actually true.

  • @BandofSorensons To a great extent it is. Academic philosophy in anglo-saxon universities has been more concerned with analytic and argumentative skills, i.e. "well-argued-for" criterion, than with e.g. the pursuit of wisdom, the truth or falsehood of the thesis proposed/well-argued-for, etc. Indeed, that seems to be the prime criterion for excellence applied to philosophy students in major philosophy (mainly analytical) departments.

  • @SonoPortoricano That's the party line but in my experience, which includes years as a graduate student of analytic philosophy, this is not really true. The criterion for excellence applied to philosophy students has absolutely nothing to do with the "well-argued-for" but has everything to do with a fuzzy and yet all important value called "scholarship". A good paper would be one that mentioned all the right names in relation to a "problem" and not necessarily one with some overarching argument.

  • @SonoPortoricano Well you can't expect all of that from students they are just learning. They are not required to discover new truths.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more