He didn't distort any facts. He pointed out that Glenn Beck cut her off and didn't let her finish her point. For what exactly? Glenn Beck decided to talk about his "restoring honor" campaign, which lead to one of the biggest losses in TV ratings. His ratings dropped to the floor. Afterwards, when his contract expired, Fox News did NOT offer him a contract renewal.
It would be different if some evidence were presented that this person really was a marxist. For example, that they have organized a radical labor union, participated in a general strike, seized the means of production, or expressed views that indicated a dialectic understanding of history. I'm not saying that it is wrong to call out leftists for what they are. It is wrong to see a liberal and immediately label them as a radical revolutionary. It is like seeing a Muslim and shouting "terrorist!"
I am so tired of this "radical Marxist" "radical socialist" nonsense. That these charges are always leveled without any supporting evidence makes me believe that those tossing these terms around don't actually know what Marxists or "socialists" really believe. It is just a euphemism for anything they don't approve of, a way of demonizing a person for there beliefs and denying dignity to opposing points of view. Interestingly enough it is exactly the tactic used and advocated by Marx and Lenin.
@ColBrokov The problem is if you let the REAL socialists hear that, then they'll use your reasoning against anybody whoso dares question their ideology legitimately.
@Objectivist1994 . What are you talking about? My point is simply that terms like communist, marxist and socialist mean something definite. They shouldn't be tossed around and used as euphemisms for anything the speaker disapproves of. Its no different from the habit some on the left have of labeling anything they disapprove of a nazi or fascist . Labels like this are just a means to avoid thinking seriously about differing opinions.
@ColBrokov Completely true. I'm just saying that half of the arguments I get from socialists or half-socialists goes along the lines of "oh well I'm not really a SOCIALIST but more of a progressive" or "I'm not a communist, I just believe in state-ownership of business!"
lol, FAIL! HTWW doesn't even understand what LV is saying, MM said "I have been warning about...Carol Browner for months and the republicans didn't listen", and the reason he said that was to bolster his point that she's a fringe extreme right winger. Then he asked the question, why was Beck's promo more important than her finishing her point? It's a legit question which he can ask. HTWW, you don't even understand what's being argued...I hope this helps.
Obama and his administration are as Marxist as Lenin and the Bolsheviks were Adam Smith followers. There is no policy implemented by this corrupt administration that is even remotely Marxist. Healthcare? I dun even think anything was actually implemented beyond the rhetoric and bluster.
I saw a video of LibViewer attacking you for your position on National Healthcare and pointing out that National Healthcare was indeed constitutional under the general welfare clause. I knew at that second he was a subversive. He can't even think of a logical rebuttal. Liberalview is a Marxist liar. LiberalView can smoke a turd in hell after he dies choking on a grimy dick.
i love how all the liberalviewer fanboys instantly flock to this video and have nothing substantial to say because thanks to the Liberal Indoctrination complex, they get they're panties in a bunch when some one says something they don't like, they spew out insults, but offer nothing on why they are right and you are wrong, very childish of them, but not surprising
It's not a surprise youtube is riddled with these idiots because the younger generation think it's cool to be a part of this so called "change" from Obama. Do you people seriously hate this country?!
You seem to be missing the point: Michelle herself said that Republicans weren't listening to her....liberalviewer didn't even mention Beck....seems lame.
I'm as liberal as they come but I'm not so much of a fan of Liberal Viewer because he makes us look like dishonest individuals who would rather look right than steadfastly hold on to what we believe. Now I disagree with this guy's political views, but I salute him for seeing what I noticed. Oh and I think Michelle Malkin is kinda hot. Not sure why. Hew voice kind of ruins it though.
In my opinion, your video and your argument lack substance. For instance, nearly half of the video focuses on your apparent ongoing feud with LiberalViewer, and it does not strongly make a case that LiberalViewer is in the habit of misleading his viewers. My advice to you is spend more time focused on making your case, and back it up with numerous examples of video evidence, not simply one that is open to interpretation at best.
I can see how LiberalViewer might have assumed that Glenn Beck was trying to stop her from talking, but you do make a good point about them talking for seven straight minutes. That's a fair amount of time. But, LiberalViewer did have a point; why wouldn't he have her talk about Browner (sp?)? That doesn't make sense to me.
LV doesnt distort anything dude he makes a vid and ask you to be the judge and he almost always has links showing the videos he uses unedited so the facts are right there your just being anti liberal
You say it's clearly that GB feels extremely bad for cutting off MM. But it's not clearly at all. The finish is abrupt. Why doesn't he mention politely to her time is up and that she needs to finish. Even o'Reilly does that. Maybe you should listen to what MM is saying. She points out the republicans made mistakes and was going into detail about it. Something you later fill in for her??? So how does all this make it clearly GB feels bad for cutting her off. I think you need thicker glasses.
I consider myself an "Independent". So, a lot of the back and forth between liberals (like "LiberalViewer") and conservatives like you is quite entertaining. While I'll agree with you that LV makes all of his points by using short cuts that leave the door open for manipulation, it must be said that you do exactly the same thing when making yours, causing your criticism of his criticism to cave in on its self.
@jayb2k11 LiberalViewer, being a lawyer, cuts up clips to not violate the Fair Use terms. Most of the time he links to the complete video with a tinyurl- or other link, so the interested (and sceptical) viewer can go and watch them in full. I haven't even watched this video, but I sure as hell am not going to. Bound to be BS. No one is more cautious of not distorting facts than LiberalViewer, and you can take that to the bank (though in the current climate that might not be such a good idea).
There is a difference between being emphatic and being effective. There is as difference between being lucid and being loud. This video is a failure and a complete waste of time.
You make irrelative accusations (like LiberalViewer's messages to you) and subjective adjectives "disturbing". LiberalViewer is extremely objective and shows the facts. You are wrong about this video and about your accusations. Keep it up though, you might get into Fox one day!
You know Lee...I do respect your opinion...but try not to embarrass yourself by calling Liberalviewer a blatant liar again XD Liberalviewer is both more open-minded and more honest than you. He not only showed us what was the real story in a video of his own, but I've seen you blatantly distort facts in many of your videos. Saying something's true doesn't inherently make it true. So do me, and yourself, a favor and don't attack someone who's more intelligent than you again.
I want you to buy a copy of Howard Kahane's Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Read it, do the exercises, get tutoring if necessary, until you have the entire book down cold.
Then I want you to apply the principals you've learned to every argument that you have ever used/been persuaded by.
I guarantee that you will find yourself a liberal, and you will no longer wish stupidity on the people who disagree with you, but intelligence instead.
This video makes no sense and makes NO points! Its nonsense and just proves everything LV siad was true! You were meant to be debunking him but you actually prove his point further! You are the easiset person to beat in a debate ever!
You have this annoying habit of just making facts and points up and think coz you put it in a nice little video that it becomes undebatable truth as every Neo-Con does.
wow.............man I just went to your channel and clearly you don't care about the facts
And btw one of the videos i watched was"Paul Ryan delivers a serious budget"
yea...............................you're a nut job ultra-conservative allright........
One last thing.........LiberalViewer is actually pretty soft on Fixed News cause he can't spend all his time debunking but you defending them and Malkin!?! is saying all there is to know about you
Oh, Michelle Malkin, who favored the interment of Asian Americans during WW2? You can't possibly edit that ugly troll to make her look anymore paranoid loony than she already is. Liberalviewer has it way over you intellectually, and, unlike you, is not a whining Tea Party sop. Get a life, and get over yourself, douchebag!
Glenn immediately made his move to stop Michelle the instant he heard Browner’s name. I have no idea what Michelle’s take on Browner is but anything too fringe for Beck must be on the fringes of the solar system.
"as you can clearly tell from that clip Genn felt extremely bad for cutting off Michelle Malkin." ...huh? How can I tell this? How can you tell this? The only noticeable thing is a quickly stated "sorry" and a check-to-check smile. I have also never seen anyone cut off a guest so quick with such little warning. Also, Glenn did not show any press for time until the exact moment Michelle mentioned the name Carol Browner.
You sir are a conservative idiot who has been brainwashed. Stop trying to ride on LVs coattails and actually create something that has a modicum of truth in it that might be actually worth watching. Oh right, sorry your a Fox viewer aren't you so you will not have anything of any worth to talk about.
I really feel sorry for our American cousins I really do!
@cisseshairdresser Save your ever relentlessness pity, Conservatives such as myself think it's hilarious how not one con is the same, yet nearly all liberals represent the latter. I value my differences, HTWW may not always be correct, but at least he puts on a good show and his knowledge of the capitalistic system is nearly flawless. Really.. don't feel sorry for us, you're in no position to do so lol.
Irregardless of liberal or conservative ideals. You fail completely to support your premise. Or anything for that matter. I'm going to watch #2 in the hope that you can do better but i suspect you are just a waste of time.
@p3snooper Holy shit you don't know what biased means. Pick up a dictionary, look it up, also look up the definition of "some one who no matter what will not listen to the other side, and will not change his/her mind" because that is what you are.(In case you are too lazy or ignorant to do so, i just defined a 'Radical')
3:22 So he felt bad, which was why he was smiling?, to keep the rest of the time to use his Fox platform to give a message about his own march? All of Fox's shows are right-wing and not news coverage. If they would openly admit it, I would have more respect for honesty.
WOW, so lame. Use Beck as fodder against "extreme" liberals? You proved nothing and made many poor assumptions. And how does seven minutes of MM have anything to do with Beck cutting her off when she clearly and distinctly was attacking conservatives for not agreeing with her? FAIL!
Yep Glenn came up on a 'HARD BRAKE.' I used to some work with a radio program years ago and everyone knows that in TV and radio everything is set on a schedule especially for commercials. The radio show that I worked with used to let caller talk as long as they wanted to but as always there is too much information and too little time to get all out. LV who only knows how to run YT with commercial breaks can only speculate because he has no clue. Well done Lee!
Wow, that's it? 100s of videos from Liberalviewer and THAT is the best example of distorting the facts you can come up with? That was lame. And BTW if there is a question mark is at the end of the sentence it is not being presented as a fact.
So Glen Beck "felt extremely bad for cutting off Michelle Malkin," how do you know? Rhetoric does not support your argument. Me saying that LV sounds more professional than you is equal to your inference of Beck's "mood". Maybe LV is more knowlegable cuz he sounds smart. A few times in this video you make general points and cite certain views as objectively "disturbing". LV's videos are well thought out, informative and stir questions. You are just shouting "Lunatic" at liberals or leftists.
@Nonoburg The culmination of the libertarianism is the direct opposition to the left. Thats why the more vocal of us cite liberals and leftists; which are actual defined terms given to members of organizations, as problematic when exposing certain members of the media as such. Just as our ideology is the decentralization of power and government, the leftwing is the continued centralization of the government. It then becomes highly "disturbing" when the majority of the media is on the far left
@MyDormantSoul you make good points and I respect your reply. I was particularly focusing on how HTWW's argument was not as strong as LV's. Furthermore, let's not confuse liberalism with leftism. Leftism, and far rightism for that matter both desire strong central gov'ts. The red chinese used to hunt down liberals. Anyway, liberalism is at the core of american values whether conservatives hate the word or not. And the media is not leftist, it's liberal. Reps just like to label it "leftist".
@Nonoburg but the definition of leftist is "someone who subrscribes to the political left," thats it. Liberal=leftwing, and voters may say otherwise but the fact is, the increase of government ownership over the private sector is a leftwing thing; ie interventionist economics, bailouts, govt healthcare. The only way the far right is believed to have a centralist agenda is fascism, which the only right thing about it is the fact that its nationalist, other than that it might as well be statism#3
@MyDormantSoul I Canadian, and Im not afraid of govt run industries like healthcare, I am simply aware of it and its progression through time. The fact is, most people dont need to go in for extensive surgery, so it works out. obviously a mixed economy is smart, one side strengthens the economy and the other spends more to give aid to the people, but it is the rightwing belief that one must always watch the left because it does indeed grow the govt at all times, thats constitutionalism for ya.
Omg. Is this irony? Glenn Beck talks for 7 minutes about with theres no mention, and he lets her go because their out of time, really strange. I'm sure talking about open Maxists is OK, but talking about Marxist who destroyed documents is too "on the fringe" for Beck... Corruption is on the fringe, thank god we have other MSM.
@serialkiller1990 I was not addressing the subject matter of malkin in this interview. I was addressing the lack of credibility of Glen Beck and HowTheWorldWorks. Beck obviously has very low credibility but so does HTWW. Here's why: They both use buzzwords and use very little useful information to back up their claims. HTWW is just yelling. My case is that Liberalviewer is a better analyzer and fact finder. If HTWW's use of a timeline is just to keep up with LV's LEAD in all this debating.
I find more funny that liberalviewer claims to be a civil libertarian. Shades of Bill Maher. You cannot be a liberation and support Obama's big government policies at the same time.
I believe HTWW must be damn effective in his arguments. Look how many liberal trolls hit this page along with distorting the like and dislike thumb panel.
When I hear people from the right call Obama and his cabinet a bunch of Marxists, I just have to laugh. The claim is pathetic. Calm down; take a deep breath. The USA is not being hijacked and forced down some path toward Communism. The government is trying to have a positive impact on people's lives, not take over the means of production. If you want to believe Obama is the head of a grand conspiracy, go ahead, but don't be surprised when people call you out for being a loon.
I'm not a partisan. I'm interested in the truth. I am always interested in listening to claims of factual errors or distortions by biased media outlets. Of the hundreds of liberal viewer videos, is the best example you have? This is your strongest case? I agree with newwind. "I'd be suprised [sic] if you could survive a College English composition class." You had over six minutes and could not adequately state your case. I won't be wasting any more time watching your pathetic videos.
7 WHOLE MINUTES ! That's why I watch TV for such exhaustive reporting as 7 min. will provide. LMFAO ! Why not discuss the FALSE media instead of feigning the left v. right B.S.
HowTheWorldWorks...you aren't free from bias yourself. I can't believe you have the audacity to say you're any better than Liberal Viewer, especially because he actually explains his points with evidence and precedents. You are a big bag of rhetoric...I'd be suprised if you could survive a College English composition class.
I'm a socialdemocrat, in many ways. I'm Norwegian. But I really like Doren's vid. Nice and objective, and exposes bias and fabrication in many liberal (in the American sense) statements, positions, portrayals and allegations.
@Pomme843 I disagree. Objective arguments don't use rhetoric like "many Obama supporters are radical marxist" or "Michele Malkin's well received book". Liberal Veiwer at least provides substantial evidence.
You have no argument, what is your evidence? At least liberalviewer gives intelligent arguments, you are just trashing him. Talk about the issues you moron, not your petty internet squabbles.
I watched the whole video and still dont get your whole point, LV's point was that
Beck cut her off, and thats exactly what he did, he cut her off, whether he cut her off because her views were too conservative is debatable, your response to his video is NOT debatable however, you didnt dispell anything, good job at getting responses based on going against anything liberal though, a concept that many of your ilk has already done with sucess. your cred is shot with me buh bye
@zunklives Lee was disproving LiberalViewer's biased assumptions, including how Malkin was cut off because she was "too fringe for Glenn Beck" and also for other conservatives when attempting to expose a proven radical Leftist such as Browner. While I agree, evidence for this was not concrete, it certainly was not a misguided stab like LV's.
"Glenn Beck let's Malkin talk for over 7 minutes because he values her opinion and expertise". The only person who values her opinion and expertise is herself. Beck values her time filling anti-liberal rants.
You apparently don't understand how network TV works. So let me explain. For an hour long show, you are only on the air for usually no more than 45 minutes (the other 15 taken by ads). For the news, there is only a certain amount of time alloted for each segment. Beck had to cut her off at 7 minutes because her interview went OVER the alloted time. And it's not just Beck's show that this happens. What you said show your ignorance of not just broadcasting but in general.
Yor an a-hole. just leave LV alone. You are taking the wind out of LV's sails because you are a jealous a-hole. You're like an anti-matter particle and you'll deprive the world of a good show because you can't stand anybody else being popular.
I haven't seen the liberalviewers' video on this, but as far as I can tell from the 30 seconds you actually spent talking about anything relevant, it boils down to you thinking that showing "jingoistic patriotic military themed blah blah blah, i forget his exact words" IS more important that allowing the chick to attack republicans for being to soft on the "marxian"(In what way is socialism an insult? We're a socialist country, we have welfare and the like.) czars(word association, clever).
"The WMD diehards will likely find some comfort in these newly-WikiLeaked documents. Skeptics will note that these relatively small WMD stockpiles were hardly the kind of grave danger that the Bush administration presented in the run-up to the war."
Oh course liberal viewer is biased. He's editing video's to prove his points, the action of which is biased. But unlike you, he provides quick and clean evidence for his statements and provides good links to his sources and the entire interview.
You're biased too, of course, but you make moronic statements and accusations all the time with little supportive evidence, and poor sources. And you suck at editing videos.
Wait wait wait, so when you make video response after video response to him it's okay but when he wants to private message you to talk it out, that's too far?
After researching some youtube clips...I find a lot of clips showcasing your dishonest "spinning". And to be honest, your points on Libview and his distorting is really weak and not very detailed...not a believer man...Are you fucking Fox News up the ass or do they just have Beck doing it for them to you?
1 minute ago I love the TYT & find their info incorrect in my opinion; all the time, but I can make videos about your sources...Edit them and make a video just like you did.... I hope you keep following the TYT, cause you need them. You need them to justify your hate and intorlance. By the way: Whatever perversion your into(and we all know what that is)...I like it harder.........HOMO LOL
Lunatics, socialists, czars, openly Marxist, extremely disturbing, leftist radicals. Remember when the Repubs called Obama a Socialist Facist? LMFAO. Those are 2 different sides of the political spectrum. Suprised I didn't hear that snuck in the video. Anyone who listens to/defends Beck doesn't know the definitions of these words. What is "radical" for a bureaucrat? I'll tell you what's radical: going to Iraq on bad intelligence and breaking the Geneva Conventions. You're just fighting to fight.
@crazydeadbread lol dont forget that the nazi's, liberals most favorite fascists, also happened to be national socialist. The only reason you think there on 2 different sides of the political spectrum is because youve been brainwashed to think so.
lol sorry for the spelling mistake. I know it really took away from the meaning of my comment. I know spelling mistakes just mean your right, and I'm glad your here to pontificate or else I would be lost. I hope this trip to reality has been nice, revisit any time you like
HAHAHAHAH!! I love this title! Everything about Libtard is annoying and deceptive. Hell, even Libtard's refusal to invest in a fucking microphone pop screen is annoying. HTWW, keep up the good videos.
@apinsent89 Seriously? I find it quite funny that you are going to insult the intelligence of another person, with a misspelled statement. (I believe you meant to say "YOU'RE AN IDIOT" as opposed to "YOUR" which is the possessive use of YOU.) Try not to insult others opinions, even if you believe that they are inferior to YOUR own opinions, because sometimes the smallest typographical error can call down the grammar and spelling Nazis (or the punctuation Brown Coats.)
LW - "to fringe to get the attention of most Republicans."
MM - "I have been warning about.......and the Republicans didn't listen."
Sound's to me like the GOP isn't interested in her statements about Carol Browner, regardless of your opinions about her or her actions in the past. Also, how long Beck and Malkin talked before Glen went on his pseudo-patriot shtick are immaterial. Good attempts at misdirection tho.
@cugamer How is the amount of TV time Beck spent with Malkin "immaterial?" Do you think this is CSPAN or your local public access channel?
see, they have these things called "Hard Breaks" which are commercial breaks programmed into the computer, this will cut the studio camera at a given time and start the commercials. IN the studio, in front of Beck, is a countdown clock, which shows how many seconds are left before the computer will cut away to commercial.
@Zaxxon2008 Ummm, "Hard Breaks" aside, please tell me how the length of time Beck and Malkin had been talking are at all material or relevant to the argument that HtWW's makes that Liberal Viewer is "Deliberately Misleading" his viewers.
@cugamer ok... the relevance lies in LibViewer claims that Beck ccut her off & wouldnt let her wildly right wingnut views be heard
when in fact, Beck had her on for 7 minutes straight, and it was time for a commercial, her sattellite invterview was over, and they were moving on to the next segment in the show
but LibViewer makes it seem like Beck CUT HER OFF to stop her opinions, in fact Beck had her on for 7 minutes. But LibViewr never acknowleldges the fact that the segment was 7 min
@Zaxxon2008 Ok, in that case why doesn't Beck highlight the fact that he is out of time? He could have easily worked that in but he doesn't. In addition, Beck clearly appears uncomfortable at what Malkin is saying. So if the interview had run for 7 minutes (or 7 hours) it still doesn't matter. Lib Viewer is making the simple point that Maklin's views are extreme even for the right, and here he presents an instance of that. Yet Doren somehow spins that into "deception."
@cugamer OK, tell ya what... i'll jump in my time machine, go back & tell Beck that LibViewtard and u will try to make a big deal that he didn't "highlight the fact that he is out of time" and all will be solved. cool?
only u assume Beck "appears uncomfortable" and when u assume, you make an ass out of yourself. leave me out of it
LibViewtard and you can CLAIM "Maklin's views are extreme" but that doesnt make it so. in fact, specifically in this case, her worries turned out prophetic
Yeah good point evorev, also the liberals try to kick your door down and steal all of your pennies, whilst the conservatives love big banks and do everything possible to maximize the banks abiility to screw the public.
@buisyman Your right, Liberals do distort facts. Like how the liberal president and his entire cabinet said Iraq "Had weapons of mass destruction," and distorted all the statistics to start an entire American war costing billions and moreover costing thousands of American lives.
@richis2fast4u Facts are not truth, dipshit. Are you too simple minded to understand that? Every spy agency around the world (including Russia and France) said Iraq had WMD's. In true liberal form, you're conveniently forgetting facts that don't fit your agenda. Bush didn't lie. The intel provided to him was wrong. You really are a stupid little cunt, aren't you?
@buisyman A) Facts are truth, learn to use a dictionary if you didnt know that. Every spy agency huh? B) If every one was so convinced than where were photos of places the WMD's were being made/built? Remember seeing on the news the blue UN trucks driving around in Iraq for months before the war that found nothing? I do. C)Bush may not have lied. But he could have done some research before rallying for war? And good job calling me a cunt. I see your 47. That's really mature of you buddy.
@Darusdei really?even bill clinton said iraq was a seriuos threat long before bush was elected. russiaand france? who gives a fuck if russia and france think anything??
@whitemanwaydownsouth intelligence reports are abit different thing than intelligence reports.
well it's obvious that your redneck ass wouldn't care, buuut then again people flew plains to your buildings, caused war in a remote place where the "win" conditions are impossible to achieve, because people like you.
@whitemanwaydownsouth you don't have to be an expert to know how handfull of very idiotic people make catastrophic mistakes.
fact is that the u.s. allies had warned u.s. months before, now i think it's pretty fucking stupid not to take it seriously when multiple sources are warning...
but hey, shitkickers like yourself know the best right? lol...
@Darusdei Perhaps y'all shouldcheck out ikileaks for the proof that Sadam HAD WMD's. It's all right there. documentation, picture, everything. Afterards, you can come back and apologise for your stupidity. And, just fyi, wikileaks is uberliberal.
@Darusdei You didn't even check it out, did you? You just go on folloing your heart, thinking that because you feel it, it MUST be truth. How old are you, little girl, 4 years old?
@buisyman i'm not claiming that i've read 400,000 pages of info.
i'm saying what they have discovered in the documents and nothing in there has suggested a weapons program which was the bush's main reason for invasion.
they have found sealed ammo storages which have been closed for ages, though the insurgents have tried to open them.
So you emulated LiberalViewer's style to attack him? Get a grip!
Appeal to Ridicule does not establish anything! All you did in this upload was list certain of your claims without providing any evidence for them. Liberalviewer allows its viewers to think for themselves, that's why at the end of his videos, he asks rather objective questions and people respond to them.
I will even be surprised if you allow my comment or any other dissident's comment to be seen by the public.
malkin, is a;" stooge"!!.. for;" foxnews",you nuts ,just keep getting your enfo.from ;"Rush,the "dope- lush". freedom of enfo. dose not alow nuts like your org. to infiltrate the office's of your so called fair and balanced reporting. you people are caught!! get'n paid buy;("BP") uhaaaaaaa....! so whats 'up....ppppp!! wit dis?????
The only "fact" that you showed liberal viewer distorting was his take on Glenn Beck's opinion of Michelle Malkin! Nothing else was distorted! You really took more than 6 minutes to state that??? Do you KNOW that Glenn Beck doesn't think Malkin is too radical? If not, then it's just your opinion versus his!
Your title for this commentary alone distorts the facts more than liberal viewer did.
He didn't distort any facts. He pointed out that Glenn Beck cut her off and didn't let her finish her point. For what exactly? Glenn Beck decided to talk about his "restoring honor" campaign, which lead to one of the biggest losses in TV ratings. His ratings dropped to the floor. Afterwards, when his contract expired, Fox News did NOT offer him a contract renewal.
rufuguru 3 days ago
It would be different if some evidence were presented that this person really was a marxist. For example, that they have organized a radical labor union, participated in a general strike, seized the means of production, or expressed views that indicated a dialectic understanding of history. I'm not saying that it is wrong to call out leftists for what they are. It is wrong to see a liberal and immediately label them as a radical revolutionary. It is like seeing a Muslim and shouting "terrorist!"
ColBrokov 2 weeks ago
I am so tired of this "radical Marxist" "radical socialist" nonsense. That these charges are always leveled without any supporting evidence makes me believe that those tossing these terms around don't actually know what Marxists or "socialists" really believe. It is just a euphemism for anything they don't approve of, a way of demonizing a person for there beliefs and denying dignity to opposing points of view. Interestingly enough it is exactly the tactic used and advocated by Marx and Lenin.
ColBrokov 2 weeks ago
@ColBrokov The problem is if you let the REAL socialists hear that, then they'll use your reasoning against anybody whoso dares question their ideology legitimately.
Objectivist1994 2 weeks ago
@Objectivist1994 . What are you talking about? My point is simply that terms like communist, marxist and socialist mean something definite. They shouldn't be tossed around and used as euphemisms for anything the speaker disapproves of. Its no different from the habit some on the left have of labeling anything they disapprove of a nazi or fascist . Labels like this are just a means to avoid thinking seriously about differing opinions.
ColBrokov 2 weeks ago
@ColBrokov Completely true. I'm just saying that half of the arguments I get from socialists or half-socialists goes along the lines of "oh well I'm not really a SOCIALIST but more of a progressive" or "I'm not a communist, I just believe in state-ownership of business!"
Objectivist1994 1 week ago
lol, FAIL! HTWW doesn't even understand what LV is saying, MM said "I have been warning about...Carol Browner for months and the republicans didn't listen", and the reason he said that was to bolster his point that she's a fringe extreme right winger. Then he asked the question, why was Beck's promo more important than her finishing her point? It's a legit question which he can ask. HTWW, you don't even understand what's being argued...I hope this helps.
HugeJohn51 3 weeks ago
Thumbs Up
because everyone should listen to both sides of the argument.
Arielslopa 1 month ago
no ratings = no credibility
CommitToFocus 1 month ago
I know you have the freedom of free speech but sir: Name-calling is something that you can never justify.
Sickboyfriend 1 month ago
Oooooh, disabled the ratings hey, how very "distorting";-)
alfa8 2 months ago
All you got is red-baiting? hahaha. go let your father hand job you some more.
swerver666 2 months ago
And yet someone has their ratings disabled and no link back to the one they're rebutting.
mrdarkevilme 2 months ago
Obama and his administration are as Marxist as Lenin and the Bolsheviks were Adam Smith followers. There is no policy implemented by this corrupt administration that is even remotely Marxist. Healthcare? I dun even think anything was actually implemented beyond the rhetoric and bluster.
arugono 3 months ago
I saw a video of LibViewer attacking you for your position on National Healthcare and pointing out that National Healthcare was indeed constitutional under the general welfare clause. I knew at that second he was a subversive. He can't even think of a logical rebuttal. Liberalview is a Marxist liar. LiberalView can smoke a turd in hell after he dies choking on a grimy dick.
Zresponder 3 months ago
@Zresponder What isn't logical about it? He "attacked" nobody. He responded politely & calmly.
Altalic77 3 weeks ago
Dude, you're a fool. LV is brilliant, and you're a lying piece of shit.
HugeJohn51 3 months ago
@HugeJohn51 I bet that you didnt even watch this
thepolice911copeland 4 weeks ago
i love how all the liberalviewer fanboys instantly flock to this video and have nothing substantial to say because thanks to the Liberal Indoctrination complex, they get they're panties in a bunch when some one says something they don't like, they spew out insults, but offer nothing on why they are right and you are wrong, very childish of them, but not surprising
maximunoutlaw32 4 months ago
Comment removed
maximunoutlaw32 4 months ago
Comment removed
maximunoutlaw32 4 months ago
Comment removed
maximunoutlaw32 4 months ago
Comment removed
maximunoutlaw32 4 months ago
It's not a surprise youtube is riddled with these idiots because the younger generation think it's cool to be a part of this so called "change" from Obama. Do you people seriously hate this country?!
tudssquadbuisness 4 months ago
You seem to be missing the point: Michelle herself said that Republicans weren't listening to her....liberalviewer didn't even mention Beck....seems lame.
MrRafaelblock 4 months ago
"Liberal viewer deliberately distorts the facts"
Hmmmm, I bet How the World Works made this video. *looks at video*
hahahahahahahahahaha
devourerofbabies 4 months ago
I'm as liberal as they come but I'm not so much of a fan of Liberal Viewer because he makes us look like dishonest individuals who would rather look right than steadfastly hold on to what we believe. Now I disagree with this guy's political views, but I salute him for seeing what I noticed. Oh and I think Michelle Malkin is kinda hot. Not sure why. Hew voice kind of ruins it though.
iwebber88 5 months ago
Radical left? Really? I think they don't understand the meaning of the word radical.
MrG0TH1ER 5 months ago
In my opinion, your video and your argument lack substance. For instance, nearly half of the video focuses on your apparent ongoing feud with LiberalViewer, and it does not strongly make a case that LiberalViewer is in the habit of misleading his viewers. My advice to you is spend more time focused on making your case, and back it up with numerous examples of video evidence, not simply one that is open to interpretation at best.
hawkeyeDJ 5 months ago
what no ratings??? not very democratic is it? in fact you might even call it "distorting the facts"
wanker
tonybuk70 5 months ago
I like how the disabled the ratings^^
Lassitofi 5 months ago
I can see how LiberalViewer might have assumed that Glenn Beck was trying to stop her from talking, but you do make a good point about them talking for seven straight minutes. That's a fair amount of time. But, LiberalViewer did have a point; why wouldn't he have her talk about Browner (sp?)? That doesn't make sense to me.
philipthewise777 5 months ago
Ratings disabled? Nice.
SlappyGomez 5 months ago
Wow, what a dueche
Phillies08WS 6 months ago
Time it took to call liberals communists in this video:
Two minuets and twenty three seconds.
"Several of Barack Obama's Advisors are OPENLY Marxist."
This is a big claim. You did not source this claim. By not sourcing this claim, you appear to be *insane*
Please retract this statement or cite it.
GoblinsnHobbits 6 months ago in playlist Debunked: Liberal Arguments, Distortions, and Lies
-_- this is sad. HOWTHEWORLDWORKS is such a dump guy
victorolsen1 6 months ago
MMMMM! crack its HOWTHEWORLDWORKS!
chromeshellking 7 months ago
LV doesnt distort anything dude he makes a vid and ask you to be the judge and he almost always has links showing the videos he uses unedited so the facts are right there your just being anti liberal
matt30666 7 months ago
You say it's clearly that GB feels extremely bad for cutting off MM. But it's not clearly at all. The finish is abrupt. Why doesn't he mention politely to her time is up and that she needs to finish. Even o'Reilly does that. Maybe you should listen to what MM is saying. She points out the republicans made mistakes and was going into detail about it. Something you later fill in for her??? So how does all this make it clearly GB feels bad for cutting her off. I think you need thicker glasses.
Firstdensity 7 months ago
@HowTheWorldWorks
I consider myself an "Independent". So, a lot of the back and forth between liberals (like "LiberalViewer") and conservatives like you is quite entertaining. While I'll agree with you that LV makes all of his points by using short cuts that leave the door open for manipulation, it must be said that you do exactly the same thing when making yours, causing your criticism of his criticism to cave in on its self.
jayb2k11 8 months ago 2
@jayb2k11 LiberalViewer, being a lawyer, cuts up clips to not violate the Fair Use terms. Most of the time he links to the complete video with a tinyurl- or other link, so the interested (and sceptical) viewer can go and watch them in full. I haven't even watched this video, but I sure as hell am not going to. Bound to be BS. No one is more cautious of not distorting facts than LiberalViewer, and you can take that to the bank (though in the current climate that might not be such a good idea).
Brogel 3 months ago
Seriously, Liberals are mentally retarded
ThatHaloGuy117 8 months ago
There is a difference between being emphatic and being effective. There is as difference between being lucid and being loud. This video is a failure and a complete waste of time.
lmelvina 8 months ago
You make irrelative accusations (like LiberalViewer's messages to you) and subjective adjectives "disturbing". LiberalViewer is extremely objective and shows the facts. You are wrong about this video and about your accusations. Keep it up though, you might get into Fox one day!
cniglari 8 months ago
We all know that you are liberalviewer, you can't fool me.
Idiota.
sergio267 8 months ago
I could make a lengthy comment detailing your stupidity, however I'll just skip all that and just say you're an idiot.
ButThePRIZE 8 months ago
You know Lee...I do respect your opinion...but try not to embarrass yourself by calling Liberalviewer a blatant liar again XD Liberalviewer is both more open-minded and more honest than you. He not only showed us what was the real story in a video of his own, but I've seen you blatantly distort facts in many of your videos. Saying something's true doesn't inherently make it true. So do me, and yourself, a favor and don't attack someone who's more intelligent than you again.
Have a nice day :D
NerdboiisAfroMan 9 months ago 2
@ HowtheWorldWorks:
I want you to buy a copy of Howard Kahane's Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life. Read it, do the exercises, get tutoring if necessary, until you have the entire book down cold.
Then I want you to apply the principals you've learned to every argument that you have ever used/been persuaded by.
I guarantee that you will find yourself a liberal, and you will no longer wish stupidity on the people who disagree with you, but intelligence instead.
skoockum 9 months ago 2
Dude for a 'genious' your pretty dumb!
This video makes no sense and makes NO points! Its nonsense and just proves everything LV siad was true! You were meant to be debunking him but you actually prove his point further! You are the easiset person to beat in a debate ever!
You have this annoying habit of just making facts and points up and think coz you put it in a nice little video that it becomes undebatable truth as every Neo-Con does.
cisseshairdresser 9 months ago
@cisseshairdresser Coming from the person who doesn't use the correct wording of "you're" It's you're not your.
puttputtking 6 months ago
@puttputtking
So since you're so clever you'll understand what an ad-hominem is then won't you? retard! Argue the points not the man!
cisseshairdresser 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hahaha.......
LiberalViewer distorts the facts?
wow.............man I just went to your channel and clearly you don't care about the facts
And btw one of the videos i watched was"Paul Ryan delivers a serious budget"
yea...............................you're a nut job ultra-conservative allright........
One last thing.........LiberalViewer is actually pretty soft on Fixed News cause he can't spend all his time debunking but you defending them and Malkin!?! is saying all there is to know about you
Bennybombomable 9 months ago 15
@Bennybombomable he is all right(correct)
mcgge7 6 months ago
Oh, Michelle Malkin, who favored the interment of Asian Americans during WW2? You can't possibly edit that ugly troll to make her look anymore paranoid loony than she already is. Liberalviewer has it way over you intellectually, and, unlike you, is not a whining Tea Party sop. Get a life, and get over yourself, douchebag!
theworldwillknowme 9 months ago
Glenn immediately made his move to stop Michelle the instant he heard Browner’s name. I have no idea what Michelle’s take on Browner is but anything too fringe for Beck must be on the fringes of the solar system.
TheReasonTroll 10 months ago
Comment removed
TheReasonTroll 10 months ago
"as you can clearly tell from that clip Genn felt extremely bad for cutting off Michelle Malkin." ...huh? How can I tell this? How can you tell this? The only noticeable thing is a quickly stated "sorry" and a check-to-check smile. I have also never seen anyone cut off a guest so quick with such little warning. Also, Glenn did not show any press for time until the exact moment Michelle mentioned the name Carol Browner.
TheReasonTroll 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LiberalViewer is da bomb. You, not so much...
FSUSW15009 10 months ago 3
look at 5:05 - 5:09 and then pause at 5:36 = lol?
in the first minute he said deliberately distorts the facts 5 times,
throughout the video he said it 11 times,
so, i still wait for which fact, which liberalviewer has stated as a fact were distorted.
i do like his way with words, like discontinuous 1:17 and rabel 2:17 marksist? 2:22
i've wasted my time... hav'nt i?
Meansofviewing 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You sir are a conservative idiot who has been brainwashed. Stop trying to ride on LVs coattails and actually create something that has a modicum of truth in it that might be actually worth watching. Oh right, sorry your a Fox viewer aren't you so you will not have anything of any worth to talk about.
I really feel sorry for our American cousins I really do!
cisseshairdresser 11 months ago 4
@cisseshairdresser Save your ever relentlessness pity, Conservatives such as myself think it's hilarious how not one con is the same, yet nearly all liberals represent the latter. I value my differences, HTWW may not always be correct, but at least he puts on a good show and his knowledge of the capitalistic system is nearly flawless. Really.. don't feel sorry for us, you're in no position to do so lol.
LunarPoetry473 5 months ago
@cisseshairdresser Idiots are those who attack people using slurs, like left wing people like you.
you don´t need to be a fox news viewer to know that.
crocve 5 months ago
Irregardless of liberal or conservative ideals. You fail completely to support your premise. Or anything for that matter. I'm going to watch #2 in the hope that you can do better but i suspect you are just a waste of time.
finerbiner 11 months ago 2
@finerbiner irregardless = double negative at best, not a word at worst
kingjeep123456789 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Holly shit. You're not biased. Nope, not at all. Not a bit. Not even slightly. No sign of that at all. None. Zip. Zero. Nada. Nyet.
You're "fair and balanced," just like Pox News.
Have you ever considered a career in entertainment? I'm sure you'll get laughs......
p3snooper 11 months ago 3
@p3snooper Holy shit you don't know what biased means. Pick up a dictionary, look it up, also look up the definition of "some one who no matter what will not listen to the other side, and will not change his/her mind" because that is what you are.(In case you are too lazy or ignorant to do so, i just defined a 'Radical')
maximunoutlaw32 4 months ago
continuously =/= continually
HyldenHero 11 months ago
LiberalViewer owns your babies' babies you personified smear campaign!
Dylan5timeS 11 months ago 2
3:22 So he felt bad, which was why he was smiling?, to keep the rest of the time to use his Fox platform to give a message about his own march? All of Fox's shows are right-wing and not news coverage. If they would openly admit it, I would have more respect for honesty.
gotitans999 11 months ago
WOW, so lame. Use Beck as fodder against "extreme" liberals? You proved nothing and made many poor assumptions. And how does seven minutes of MM have anything to do with Beck cutting her off when she clearly and distinctly was attacking conservatives for not agreeing with her? FAIL!
ComicFreak2099 11 months ago
Yep Glenn came up on a 'HARD BRAKE.' I used to some work with a radio program years ago and everyone knows that in TV and radio everything is set on a schedule especially for commercials. The radio show that I worked with used to let caller talk as long as they wanted to but as always there is too much information and too little time to get all out. LV who only knows how to run YT with commercial breaks can only speculate because he has no clue. Well done Lee!
jrc99us 11 months ago
Wow, that's it? 100s of videos from Liberalviewer and THAT is the best example of distorting the facts you can come up with? That was lame. And BTW if there is a question mark is at the end of the sentence it is not being presented as a fact.
HowTheWorldWorks is such a hack.
verstwo2 11 months ago
@Avush LOL that's the best you got? Do a vid about how you are right.
BorgKing001 1 year ago
Oh dear, I thought you where the Stephen Colbert of right wing politics. I stand corrected. You are a fucktard.
Even if Liberal Viewer distorted facts - and he did as demonstrated by your video - you are still a fucktard.
Hint - try looking at both sides of the argument, and the basis of their beliefs. ie Rationalism vs magical thinking.
silverspirit2001 1 year ago
You really don't seem to understand "How the World Works"...
LiberatedThinkers 1 year ago
I don't agree with u: Your Analysis has critized one single small Aspect, and your own BIG Bias came out... that's poor...
BUT: My Question: You critisize a critic? What for?
;)
thocze 1 year ago
I don't agree with u: Your Analysis has critized one single small Aspect, and your own Bias came out... that's poor...
;)
thocze 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So Glen Beck "felt extremely bad for cutting off Michelle Malkin," how do you know? Rhetoric does not support your argument. Me saying that LV sounds more professional than you is equal to your inference of Beck's "mood". Maybe LV is more knowlegable cuz he sounds smart. A few times in this video you make general points and cite certain views as objectively "disturbing". LV's videos are well thought out, informative and stir questions. You are just shouting "Lunatic" at liberals or leftists.
Nonoburg 1 year ago 41
@Nonoburg Which is just what conservatives tend to do
robman8855 11 months ago
@Nonoburg The culmination of the libertarianism is the direct opposition to the left. Thats why the more vocal of us cite liberals and leftists; which are actual defined terms given to members of organizations, as problematic when exposing certain members of the media as such. Just as our ideology is the decentralization of power and government, the leftwing is the continued centralization of the government. It then becomes highly "disturbing" when the majority of the media is on the far left
MyDormantSoul 8 months ago
@MyDormantSoul you make good points and I respect your reply. I was particularly focusing on how HTWW's argument was not as strong as LV's. Furthermore, let's not confuse liberalism with leftism. Leftism, and far rightism for that matter both desire strong central gov'ts. The red chinese used to hunt down liberals. Anyway, liberalism is at the core of american values whether conservatives hate the word or not. And the media is not leftist, it's liberal. Reps just like to label it "leftist".
Nonoburg 8 months ago
@Nonoburg but the definition of leftist is "someone who subrscribes to the political left," thats it. Liberal=leftwing, and voters may say otherwise but the fact is, the increase of government ownership over the private sector is a leftwing thing; ie interventionist economics, bailouts, govt healthcare. The only way the far right is believed to have a centralist agenda is fascism, which the only right thing about it is the fact that its nationalist, other than that it might as well be statism#3
MyDormantSoul 8 months ago
@MyDormantSoul I Canadian, and Im not afraid of govt run industries like healthcare, I am simply aware of it and its progression through time. The fact is, most people dont need to go in for extensive surgery, so it works out. obviously a mixed economy is smart, one side strengthens the economy and the other spends more to give aid to the people, but it is the rightwing belief that one must always watch the left because it does indeed grow the govt at all times, thats constitutionalism for ya.
MyDormantSoul 8 months ago
@Nonoburg
Omg. Is this irony? Glenn Beck talks for 7 minutes about with theres no mention, and he lets her go because their out of time, really strange. I'm sure talking about open Maxists is OK, but talking about Marxist who destroyed documents is too "on the fringe" for Beck... Corruption is on the fringe, thank god we have other MSM.
serialkiller1990 7 months ago
@serialkiller1990 I was not addressing the subject matter of malkin in this interview. I was addressing the lack of credibility of Glen Beck and HowTheWorldWorks. Beck obviously has very low credibility but so does HTWW. Here's why: They both use buzzwords and use very little useful information to back up their claims. HTWW is just yelling. My case is that Liberalviewer is a better analyzer and fact finder. If HTWW's use of a timeline is just to keep up with LV's LEAD in all this debating.
Nonoburg 5 months ago
I find more funny that liberalviewer claims to be a civil libertarian. Shades of Bill Maher. You cannot be a liberation and support Obama's big government policies at the same time.
xxashyy 1 year ago
I believe HTWW must be damn effective in his arguments. Look how many liberal trolls hit this page along with distorting the like and dislike thumb panel.
xxashyy 1 year ago
When I hear people from the right call Obama and his cabinet a bunch of Marxists, I just have to laugh. The claim is pathetic. Calm down; take a deep breath. The USA is not being hijacked and forced down some path toward Communism. The government is trying to have a positive impact on people's lives, not take over the means of production. If you want to believe Obama is the head of a grand conspiracy, go ahead, but don't be surprised when people call you out for being a loon.
frankroto 1 year ago 2
@0crazylegs Butthurt?
killallhipsters 1 year ago
@killallhipsters yeah.............must be. [Facepalm]
0crazylegs 1 year ago
I'm not a partisan. I'm interested in the truth. I am always interested in listening to claims of factual errors or distortions by biased media outlets. Of the hundreds of liberal viewer videos, is the best example you have? This is your strongest case? I agree with newwind. "I'd be suprised [sic] if you could survive a College English composition class." You had over six minutes and could not adequately state your case. I won't be wasting any more time watching your pathetic videos.
bmcmanus28 1 year ago
7 WHOLE MINUTES ! That's why I watch TV for such exhaustive reporting as 7 min. will provide. LMFAO ! Why not discuss the FALSE media instead of feigning the left v. right B.S.
icespike361 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HowTheWorldWorks...you aren't free from bias yourself. I can't believe you have the audacity to say you're any better than Liberal Viewer, especially because he actually explains his points with evidence and precedents. You are a big bag of rhetoric...I'd be suprised if you could survive a College English composition class.
newwind07 1 year ago
I'm a socialdemocrat, in many ways. I'm Norwegian. But I really like Doren's vid. Nice and objective, and exposes bias and fabrication in many liberal (in the American sense) statements, positions, portrayals and allegations.
Pomme843 1 year ago 2
@Pomme843 I disagree. Objective arguments don't use rhetoric like "many Obama supporters are radical marxist" or "Michele Malkin's well received book". Liberal Veiwer at least provides substantial evidence.
newwind07 1 year ago
Obama's supporters make marxist claims?
Is that the largest of your concerns in light of what stuff has spawned from the mouths of Palin, Roberstson, Bush, Cheney, O'donnel, McCain, etc.?
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 1 year ago
You have no argument, what is your evidence? At least liberalviewer gives intelligent arguments, you are just trashing him. Talk about the issues you moron, not your petty internet squabbles.
Kriegtime101 1 year ago
FUCK YOU. YOU SUCK
ausversehn0 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I watched the whole video and still dont get your whole point, LV's point was that
Beck cut her off, and thats exactly what he did, he cut her off, whether he cut her off because her views were too conservative is debatable, your response to his video is NOT debatable however, you didnt dispell anything, good job at getting responses based on going against anything liberal though, a concept that many of your ilk has already done with sucess. your cred is shot with me buh bye
zunklives 1 year ago 35
@zunklives Lee was disproving LiberalViewer's biased assumptions, including how Malkin was cut off because she was "too fringe for Glenn Beck" and also for other conservatives when attempting to expose a proven radical Leftist such as Browner. While I agree, evidence for this was not concrete, it certainly was not a misguided stab like LV's.
awise107 1 year ago
@zunklives Did you actually watch the whole video....um without the mute button on?
YoUr CreeeeD is shOt wIth me BUH BYE
mikeyboy236 1 year ago
"Glenn Beck let's Malkin talk for over 7 minutes because he values her opinion and expertise". The only person who values her opinion and expertise is herself. Beck values her time filling anti-liberal rants.
evilnolan 1 year ago
@evilnolan
@zunklives
You apparently don't understand how network TV works. So let me explain. For an hour long show, you are only on the air for usually no more than 45 minutes (the other 15 taken by ads). For the news, there is only a certain amount of time alloted for each segment. Beck had to cut her off at 7 minutes because her interview went OVER the alloted time. And it's not just Beck's show that this happens. What you said show your ignorance of not just broadcasting but in general.
monty287 1 year ago
@monty287 your a MORON aswell.
0crazylegs 1 year ago
@0crazylegs The evidence being....?
monty287 1 year ago
You suck at this.
IHateStaleCrackers 1 year ago
Yor an a-hole. just leave LV alone. You are taking the wind out of LV's sails because you are a jealous a-hole. You're like an anti-matter particle and you'll deprive the world of a good show because you can't stand anybody else being popular.
SoldierZ340 1 year ago
i watched LV response to this video , this guy needs to find something else to do nothing he stated hear fits the facts LV showed
smithbrass 1 year ago
I haven't seen the liberalviewers' video on this, but as far as I can tell from the 30 seconds you actually spent talking about anything relevant, it boils down to you thinking that showing "jingoistic patriotic military themed blah blah blah, i forget his exact words" IS more important that allowing the chick to attack republicans for being to soft on the "marxian"(In what way is socialism an insult? We're a socialist country, we have welfare and the like.) czars(word association, clever).
Thereisnomatter 1 year ago
"she was found in CONTEMPT of court!"
(correction, correction... actually it was EPA...)
LOL, you're so stupid, its funny...
LMAO
You should do a comedy routine.
rubberbaby00 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"The WMD diehards will likely find some comfort in these newly-WikiLeaked documents. Skeptics will note that these relatively small WMD stockpiles were hardly the kind of grave danger that the Bush administration presented in the run-up to the war."
when you fail you fail...
Darusdei 1 year ago
Oh course liberal viewer is biased. He's editing video's to prove his points, the action of which is biased. But unlike you, he provides quick and clean evidence for his statements and provides good links to his sources and the entire interview.
You're biased too, of course, but you make moronic statements and accusations all the time with little supportive evidence, and poor sources. And you suck at editing videos.
LeadBeIIy 1 year ago
AS if Michelle Malkin or Lee doesn't distort the facts
EsClayWilson 1 year ago
Wait wait wait, so when you make video response after video response to him it's okay but when he wants to private message you to talk it out, that's too far?
metalrox555 1 year ago
After researching some youtube clips...I find a lot of clips showcasing your dishonest "spinning". And to be honest, your points on Libview and his distorting is really weak and not very detailed...not a believer man...Are you fucking Fox News up the ass or do they just have Beck doing it for them to you?
jcem24 1 year ago
There's alot of talking; not a whole lot of points made. Pretty weak.
wmorfin 1 year ago
Weak video. I mean, LiberalViewer's voice is worse than yours but you somehow still managed to make a duller video.
mootothehood 1 year ago
Ahh and btw did you not see Glen Beck's face when she mentioned that name? They took her off the air because she is a nut bag.
pickledouche 1 year ago
you sound like a big baby
pickledouche 1 year ago
the name says it all, liberal(liar)viewer
whitemanwaydownsouth 1 year ago
1 minute ago I love the TYT & find their info incorrect in my opinion; all the time, but I can make videos about your sources...Edit them and make a video just like you did.... I hope you keep following the TYT, cause you need them. You need them to justify your hate and intorlance. By the way: Whatever perversion your into(and we all know what that is)...I like it harder.........HOMO LOL
GENERALJOHNNYREBEL 1 year ago
Lunatics, socialists, czars, openly Marxist, extremely disturbing, leftist radicals. Remember when the Repubs called Obama a Socialist Facist? LMFAO. Those are 2 different sides of the political spectrum. Suprised I didn't hear that snuck in the video. Anyone who listens to/defends Beck doesn't know the definitions of these words. What is "radical" for a bureaucrat? I'll tell you what's radical: going to Iraq on bad intelligence and breaking the Geneva Conventions. You're just fighting to fight.
crazydeadbread 1 year ago
@crazydeadbread lol dont forget that the nazi's, liberals most favorite fascists, also happened to be national socialist. The only reason you think there on 2 different sides of the political spectrum is because youve been brainwashed to think so.
Illumified 1 year ago
bull shit and lie the liberalviewer powned you on all of the above you cheeses Glenn Beck whanna bee
Richardisdorky 1 year ago
lol sorry for the spelling mistake. I know it really took away from the meaning of my comment. I know spelling mistakes just mean your right, and I'm glad your here to pontificate or else I would be lost. I hope this trip to reality has been nice, revisit any time you like
apinsent89 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAH!! I love this title! Everything about Libtard is annoying and deceptive. Hell, even Libtard's refusal to invest in a fucking microphone pop screen is annoying. HTWW, keep up the good videos.
savemyplaylist 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out my Michelle Malkin tribute song. Just visit my channel.
8/28
tinnitischannel 1 year ago
YOUR AN IDIOT man seriously get a life and come back to reality
apinsent89 1 year ago
Comment removed
jwreagan 1 year ago
@apinsent89 Seriously? I find it quite funny that you are going to insult the intelligence of another person, with a misspelled statement. (I believe you meant to say "YOU'RE AN IDIOT" as opposed to "YOUR" which is the possessive use of YOU.) Try not to insult others opinions, even if you believe that they are inferior to YOUR own opinions, because sometimes the smallest typographical error can call down the grammar and spelling Nazis (or the punctuation Brown Coats.)
jwreagan 1 year ago
LW - "to fringe to get the attention of most Republicans."
MM - "I have been warning about.......and the Republicans didn't listen."
Sound's to me like the GOP isn't interested in her statements about Carol Browner, regardless of your opinions about her or her actions in the past. Also, how long Beck and Malkin talked before Glen went on his pseudo-patriot shtick are immaterial. Good attempts at misdirection tho.
cugamer 1 year ago
@cugamer How is the amount of TV time Beck spent with Malkin "immaterial?" Do you think this is CSPAN or your local public access channel?
see, they have these things called "Hard Breaks" which are commercial breaks programmed into the computer, this will cut the studio camera at a given time and start the commercials. IN the studio, in front of Beck, is a countdown clock, which shows how many seconds are left before the computer will cut away to commercial.
consider this lesson learned
Zaxxon2008 1 year ago
@Zaxxon2008 Ummm, "Hard Breaks" aside, please tell me how the length of time Beck and Malkin had been talking are at all material or relevant to the argument that HtWW's makes that Liberal Viewer is "Deliberately Misleading" his viewers.
cugamer 1 year ago
@cugamer ok... the relevance lies in LibViewer claims that Beck ccut her off & wouldnt let her wildly right wingnut views be heard
when in fact, Beck had her on for 7 minutes straight, and it was time for a commercial, her sattellite invterview was over, and they were moving on to the next segment in the show
but LibViewer makes it seem like Beck CUT HER OFF to stop her opinions, in fact Beck had her on for 7 minutes. But LibViewr never acknowleldges the fact that the segment was 7 min
Zaxxon2008 1 year ago
@Zaxxon2008 Ok, in that case why doesn't Beck highlight the fact that he is out of time? He could have easily worked that in but he doesn't. In addition, Beck clearly appears uncomfortable at what Malkin is saying. So if the interview had run for 7 minutes (or 7 hours) it still doesn't matter. Lib Viewer is making the simple point that Maklin's views are extreme even for the right, and here he presents an instance of that. Yet Doren somehow spins that into "deception."
cugamer 1 year ago
@cugamer OK, tell ya what... i'll jump in my time machine, go back & tell Beck that LibViewtard and u will try to make a big deal that he didn't "highlight the fact that he is out of time" and all will be solved. cool?
only u assume Beck "appears uncomfortable" and when u assume, you make an ass out of yourself. leave me out of it
LibViewtard and you can CLAIM "Maklin's views are extreme" but that doesnt make it so. in fact, specifically in this case, her worries turned out prophetic
Zaxxon2008 1 year ago
Yeah good point evorev, also the liberals try to kick your door down and steal all of your pennies, whilst the conservatives love big banks and do everything possible to maximize the banks abiility to screw the public.
richis2fast4u 1 year ago
Neo Cons - Right wing fascists who love war ( as long as poor do the fighting) and are pro corporation, love enslaving people.
Liberals - Left wing fascists who promote male bashing feminism, hate whites, and indoctrinate the colleges with they're ideology.
Fuck both of you!
6evorev6 1 year ago
@6evorev6 'Bout sums it up. What're you, a libertarian?
MrUnicorn1995 1 year ago
Comment removed
donotoperateoncrack 1 year ago
Liberals always distort the facts. It's 1 of 2 arguements they have. the otherone is racism.
buisyman 1 year ago
@buisyman what do conservatives do?
HighFlyActionGuy 1 year ago
@buisyman Your right, Liberals do distort facts. Like how the liberal president and his entire cabinet said Iraq "Had weapons of mass destruction," and distorted all the statistics to start an entire American war costing billions and moreover costing thousands of American lives.
Wait?
richis2fast4u 1 year ago
@richis2fast4u Facts are not truth, dipshit. Are you too simple minded to understand that? Every spy agency around the world (including Russia and France) said Iraq had WMD's. In true liberal form, you're conveniently forgetting facts that don't fit your agenda. Bush didn't lie. The intel provided to him was wrong. You really are a stupid little cunt, aren't you?
buisyman 1 year ago
@buisyman A) Facts are truth, learn to use a dictionary if you didnt know that. Every spy agency huh? B) If every one was so convinced than where were photos of places the WMD's were being made/built? Remember seeing on the news the blue UN trucks driving around in Iraq for months before the war that found nothing? I do. C)Bush may not have lied. But he could have done some research before rallying for war? And good job calling me a cunt. I see your 47. That's really mature of you buddy.
richis2fast4u 1 year ago
@richis2fast4u Riiiiiiight.
buisyman 1 year ago
@buisyman yeah you lost that one son
Madorem 1 year ago
@Madorem Thank you! lol.
richis2fast4u 1 year ago
@Madorem In what way? Facts can be distorted, we e lawyers do it in court every day. The truth i immutable.
buisyman 1 year ago
@richis2fast4u Facts can be skewed to mean something else. Truth is immutable
buisyman 1 year ago
@buisyman Sorry, 46, my bad.
richis2fast4u 1 year ago
@buisyman Fuck off you don't have a clue what your talking about.
SuperTorres1990 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SuperTorres1990 Riiiiiiiight
buisyman 1 year ago
@buisyman facts? russia, france, britain nor israel proclaimed that iraq had "wmd's"
neither did the cia, they actualy said that iraq posses no immediate threat to it's neighbours, u.s. or it's allies.
calling others you don't seem very bright yourself
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei really?even bill clinton said iraq was a seriuos threat long before bush was elected. russiaand france? who gives a fuck if russia and france think anything??
whitemanwaydownsouth 1 year ago
@whitemanwaydownsouth intelligence reports are abit different thing than intelligence reports.
well it's obvious that your redneck ass wouldn't care, buuut then again people flew plains to your buildings, caused war in a remote place where the "win" conditions are impossible to achieve, because people like you.
who "don't care" or simply won't think...
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei lol every non american is an expert on american politics
whitemanwaydownsouth 1 year ago
@whitemanwaydownsouth you don't have to be an expert to know how handfull of very idiotic people make catastrophic mistakes.
fact is that the u.s. allies had warned u.s. months before, now i think it's pretty fucking stupid not to take it seriously when multiple sources are warning...
but hey, shitkickers like yourself know the best right? lol...
you're the reason world laughs at you.
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei Perhaps y'all shouldcheck out ikileaks for the proof that Sadam HAD WMD's. It's all right there. documentation, picture, everything. Afterards, you can come back and apologise for your stupidity. And, just fyi, wikileaks is uberliberal.
buisyman 1 year ago
@buisyman wikileaks is liberal? wtf...
btw...
"WikiLeaks war logs doesn’t reveal evidence of some massive WMD program by the Saddam Hussein regime"
the same old stuff which was mostly destroyed in the first gulf war...
no modern weaponry, not even usable...
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei You didn't even check it out, did you? You just go on folloing your heart, thinking that because you feel it, it MUST be truth. How old are you, little girl, 4 years old?
buisyman 1 year ago
@Darusdei P.S. I kno you didn't look, because there are almot 400,000 page of documents. No one reads THAT fast.
buisyman 1 year ago
@buisyman i'm not claiming that i've read 400,000 pages of info.
i'm saying what they have discovered in the documents and nothing in there has suggested a weapons program which was the bush's main reason for invasion.
they have found sealed ammo storages which have been closed for ages, though the insurgents have tried to open them.
Darusdei 1 year ago
YOU SUCK!! F*ck yourself!
maumad103 1 year ago
So you emulated LiberalViewer's style to attack him? Get a grip!
Appeal to Ridicule does not establish anything! All you did in this upload was list certain of your claims without providing any evidence for them. Liberalviewer allows its viewers to think for themselves, that's why at the end of his videos, he asks rather objective questions and people respond to them.
I will even be surprised if you allow my comment or any other dissident's comment to be seen by the public.
kkamizadeh 1 year ago
malkin, is a;" stooge"!!.. for;" foxnews",you nuts ,just keep getting your enfo.from ;"Rush,the "dope- lush". freedom of enfo. dose not alow nuts like your org. to infiltrate the office's of your so called fair and balanced reporting. you people are caught!! get'n paid buy;("BP") uhaaaaaaa....! so whats 'up....ppppp!! wit dis?????
prophecyunveiled 1 year ago
lib view is the lowest typ of scum, lower then The Young Turks kind.
ORVX 1 year ago
lol you said "extreme remarks" on the video with the nazi tourettes guy
nailo1 1 year ago
I think Michelle is hot!
daveme7 1 year ago
Liberal Viewer is another demon run liberal media outlet.
graydog36 1 year ago
The only "fact" that you showed liberal viewer distorting was his take on Glenn Beck's opinion of Michelle Malkin! Nothing else was distorted! You really took more than 6 minutes to state that??? Do you KNOW that Glenn Beck doesn't think Malkin is too radical? If not, then it's just your opinion versus his!
Your title for this commentary alone distorts the facts more than liberal viewer did.
johnedwards1968 1 year ago
@johnedwards1968 I think he wanted to show the events leading up to this incident.
dukee155 1 year ago