Added: 4 years ago
From: progressiveamerica
Views: 12,032
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • it seems like waxman did not want to hear the definition of what the act said about plame. DEMOCRATS EXIST ON HALF TRUTHS AND LIES.

  • JUST WATCH and LISTEN to how Toensing TRIES HARD TO LIE, as she TRIES HARD TO QUALIFY HER OPINIONS... as FACT. But WAXMAN directly questions this fast-talking snake and GETS HER TO ADMIT THAT SHE'S A LIAR. I love it how the REPUBLICANS TRY TO LIE at EVERY OPPORTUNITY. Not here! Ha!

  • FOR SOME EXCELLENT WAXMAN HEARINGS... Watch these hearings: Iraq Embassy Construction, Lurida Doan (GSA), Valerie Plame, Blackwater, and the Tillman hearings. WAXMAN and the DEMOCRATS uncover SO MUCH REPUBLICAN TREASON, it's not even funny. Bravo Waxman. Bravo!

  • FANTASTiC JOB, WAXMAN. That's why he remains the BEST CHAIRMAN of the Committee, who is now chaired by that acidic liar, Darrell Issa. Waxman is brilliant as he RIPS TOENSING A NEW ONE, and underscores that her statement is a WEB OF LIES. Bravo, Henry Waxman. Bravo!

  • What a fucking BULLY!

  • It is totally innappropriate for Waxman to mention the name of General Hayden when he demands that Gloria's testimony be under oath.And Hayden is not there to give his own testimony or take an oath. This is sheer character assassination. She had no obligation to answer him whatsoever as being under oath one had the right to plead the fifth ammendent. Waxman is a hatchett man and a scumbag. Good riddence before the fact of his death.

  • WaxMan doesn't ask questions, he asks/TELLS you the answer then reminds you that he hasn't yielded the time back so there's no reason to respond cause he already gave you the answer to his question/answer!! WaxMan is such a D!K!!

  • Typical lying lawyer who wants to redefine reality until it fits her agenda.

    Wouldnm't know the truth if it bit her skanky ass.

    She would have fitted in great in Bushg's white house.

  • Holy hell, she tore him to pieces. He was probably walking funny for weeks after this.

  • @bweazel

    "Tore him to pieces" You are delusional.

    Then again you sound like a republican so delusions are par for the course.

  • PLAME WAS NOT COVERT. Conspiracy theory crackheads.

  • @nvieira100

    You are wrong, there was only one prosecution in this case and it was because Scooter Libby apparently lied to the FBI. Waxman misrepresented his conversation with the head of the CIA, and Rove was not the leaker. It was finally revealed that the person who revealed Plame's identity was her husband, Joe Wilson.

  • video was a little short i felt like it was just getting started.

  • toensing another Bush repug whore bitch liar

  • As it turns out Plame was not covert and Rove did not leak her name. Not only was Toensing right on both counts, but in fact Rove had not said he leaked Plame's name, he had only refused to deny he did, and the head of the CIA had not said Plame was covert, he had simply refused to say she was not covert. Waxman misrepresented the facts for his own political aggrandisement.

  • @AppleSpar You're on crack. I guess the courts ... judge, jury ... misrepresented the facts too right? Yeah, go to your little corner of the crack house and take another pull will ya.

  • Waxman has some psychological problems.

  • @Starbuck926 Does he really? Why? Because he isn't afraid to show his outrage at the lies this douche bag told and continues to try to tell? Or is it because he refuses to allow her any room for more lies? The one with the psychological problems is the douche bag he's interviewing. Get a grip.

  • go waxy wax

  • This from the party that had to define the meaning of the word is.

  • Hehe, Waxman can only win the debate by not letting her speak... Sad, really... As she said, Plame never was covert by the definition of the CIA. Simply stating a desk is really a watercooler, doesn't make it any more of a beveridge dispenser than them SAYING Plame was covert, if, when in fact, her job was that of a glorified CIA desk clerk...

  • you better listen ratman, you will be so no lub screwed playing the setup card now, when the dobble cross is on.

  • Great broadcast of Henry Waxman speaking on JewishJournal!

  • Seriously...who votes for this guy? Who?

  • Woa! Henry Waxman has already decided on the outcome and is impatiently going through the motions. That's obvious.

  • Waxman " I'll ask a question, but you can't answer " Very Progressive !!! Thanks for your posts. You can't see the forest from the trees.

  • Yeah, you can see the delusional wingnuts drool gallons of ignorance.

  • Wow! now, that's a bit of a stretch. People will, in all likelyhood, eventually, go to prison over many of the crimes committed against this nation and our Constitution. Fortunately, the chance that any of them will be Valerie Plame is about the same as the chance of Chairman Waxman do ANYTHING at your behest. Perhaps you should try leaving the lush rimjob dietary supliments on the shelf before you next expose yourself to the consideration of those of us who exist on this demensional plane.

  • This is such a perversion of partisan politics. Waxman did his level best to suppress her testimony -- even though she was the principle author of the Intelligence Identity Protection Act which is central in defining Plames status....Plame was not protected under the law. No further argument.

  • This 'clip' doesn't give context to her testimony. She was being asked to explain statements that she made as factual which weren't factual at all. Waxman was trying to show those statements she made as factual weren't factual at all and Toensing being the good little partisian she is was not able to answer yes or now without showing the world what she really is so she tried to use up the time.

  • Sorry, you're dead wrong. She was answering truthfully, and Waxman didn't want to hear the truth. And neither do you, because the truth contradicts the awful things you want to believe about the Bush Administration. "Context" is just another word for political spin used by the liberal media.

  • Henry Waxman doing Sean Hannity. Just answer the question. Yes or no. I thought this was a hearing. Who's doing the hearing?Why call it a hearing?

  • That is Rep. Waxman's perogative. He is asking these questions in the capacity of the Chairman of a Congressional committee, as opposed to that of some "fair and balanced" hack on faux "news". Ms. Toensing is under oath and, therefor, obligated to answer Mr. Waxman's yes/no questions without injecting her own partisan monologue.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more