@natmanprime That is correct. The video does not claim the contrary. The video claims that they are *relative* primes to the previously found primes, 2 and 3. You may also be interested in taking a look at my Prime Gaps idea at youtube.com/watch?v=j3eYoOTBK68 .
35 and 49 aren't prime numbers.
7*7 and 7*5...
natmanprime 1 year ago
@natmanprime That is correct. The video does not claim the contrary. The video claims that they are *relative* primes to the previously found primes, 2 and 3. You may also be interested in taking a look at my Prime Gaps idea at youtube.com/watch?v=j3eYoOTBK68 .
adanieltorres 1 year ago