Added: 4 years ago
From: Freedomlover911
Views: 154,706
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (611)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What a loser. A floating piece of paper is not a laser.

  • @closebits Yeh its a floating bit of paper!! thats bright RED! that isnt affected by the fireball or the impact and has a high freq flicker which happens to match laser targeting systems and the jet turns towards it at last moment!! This is a IR laser! seen because the camera had Night Shot enabled! DUH!!!!!!!

  • And also we use inferred lasers

  • Not possible for the whistle thing most of our stealth uavs have prop engines

  • That is a UAV for sure, but im just saying.. in all the other vids the lazer isnt there.

  • Comment removed

  • With all due respect you claim the camera is picking up the sound of the UAV's "whistle" but yet the jet engines or collision/explosion moments before on the second tower are barely audible for us to then hear the screams/shouting of a human!!!

    Not only that the whole point of a UAV is to fly so high it will NOT be spotted, so flying straight through the "danger zone" is a big NO NO.

    This can be very dangerous to a weak mind so fuck you cockwashing nonce fodder!!!!

  • A lame attempt to deliberately dis-credit those that don't believe the official story.

  • Pussy

    

  • how come the favorit like is a half assed description (light coutinus when plain has already hit tower) an dosnt even address there other video of the drone ,people like to beleave what they beleave even if its against facts or sence

  • You stupid fuck, you can't actually s-e-e that kind of laser in the naked eye.. noob...

  • @shai3060 lol, Dumbass. It isn't being seen by a 'naked eye'. It is being filmed and loads of home video camera's are capable of picking up infrared.

  • Or... it was a plane.... but hey, if your dumbass thinks that it was an attack that the american government did on itself... then go right ahead...

  • This is a bunch of crap, project the image on a screen and shine a white dot on any area you want, Maybe have an image if Mickey Mouse smiling back at you, or maybe use the "Alien" image from a "Recovered Alien Aircraft" documentary, that would be better, thousands of freaks could claim it was aliens.

  • total setup

    

  • omg laser is in the smoke stilllllll??????????

  • That was a huge drone LOL

  • lol

  • They are desperatly afraid that the american people will finally realize that the media was complicit in the attacks by broadcasting fake video of commercial airliners travelling way over VMO, performing high g maneuvers and then smashing into the world trade center towers. Debunkers attack this theory the most because it is the most dangerous.

  • @Daddyo930 , cause there were NO EYEWITNESSES who saw the planes. Most dangerous? Try most stupid.

  • @vsdefender What are you like 10 or something? You got final fantasy, lady gaga and gwen stafani on your channel. Go away. Your obviously too young to understand 7th grade physics or even understand what VMO is let alone what CGI means.

  • @Daddyo930

    What does my taste in music have to do with anything? Can you demonstrate that the aircraft was operating above its maximum velocity or are you just blowing hot air? CGI? Are you saying that eyewitnesses were seeing a holographic image of a plane?

    I know you think you're some sort of expert. You're not.

  • @vsdefender Maybe you should have done some research and consulted with Boeing before making that statement. Try googling Boeing 757 VMO-MMO performance limitations. Then get back to me.

  • yeah for "SMART WEAPONS" not passenger planes...

  • thats not predator drone

  • The americans are full of bull. these 19 hijackers in their flight stimulator were caught practising hitting the WTC and still no one guessed their real purpose of training until unfortunately it was too late and i still dont think that the americans wud do somthing so stupid as to destroy their own iconic buildings. wake up conspiracy theorists. Americans maybe dumb and bullies, but they are not idiots and also it is a great country.

  • The americans are full of bull. these 19 hijackers in their flight stimulator were caught practising hitting the WTC and still no one guessed their real purpose of training until unfortunately it was too late and i still dont think that the americans wud do somthing so stupid as to destroy their own iconic buildings. wake up conspiracy theorists. Americans maybe dumb and bullies, but they are not idiots.

  • What is the object of this video? that the americans destroyed their iconic buildings, killed their people, destroyed their economy to control arab oil which was already under their control???? these fucking conspiracy theorists will stop at nothing to try to prove that americans have done this or israelis. i think whoever has made this video is a very huge sympathizer of al-qaeeda or at least a radical. i will not be surprise if he is a ungrateful pakistani living as an immigrant in USA.

  • @anilsreedhar1973 The fact is,is that the global elite have been the ones starting all of these wars for their NEW WORLD ORDER to enslave,imprison and murder most of the population and we seem to sit back and allow them to walk all over us. They are the trojen horse in all countries and have been playing the entire world as fools. Do we stop this or let it continue?

  • watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q everyone who calls it the reflection of the plane or something else, this video explains a bit better then this guys post, check it out

  • 114 CIA agents dislike this video ... oh comon guys , we still believe in SantaClaus

  • I've read quite a few comments and it's safe to say many people didn't watch the video too closely. The 'paper' which moves across the screen doesn't defect when the plane hits. It then disappears a few seconds after the impact.

    Whoever thinks of it as a reflection of the plane really, really didn't see the video. The plane crashes. The 'reflection' would disappear. Not travel across the flames and onto the neighbouring building. As for being able to see IR light. The human eye cannot see it

  • BS.. even in actual drone attacks in Pakistan border you don't see the tageting laser, even with an IR sensitive drone camera! ffs.. get a grip US!...

    btw.. what is a drone whistle!? idiot!

  • BS.. even in actual drone attacks in Pakistan border you don't see the tageting laser, even with an IR sensitive drone camera! ffs.. get a grip US!...

  • Piece of paper falling, dope. Get a grip

  • @smartestmanonnet watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q, this is a bit better of what this guy posted, check this one out.

  • NO DOUBT

  • thats prob the fucking reflection of the plane you fucking dipshit. also osama. who is dead, has admitted to doing it. you sir are a fucking retard

  • You, sir, have just failed epically.

  • Some people say the building were huge and hard to miss. Hard to miss seeing them but not flying a Jet into them.

    If this was a homing laser, it came from the Woolworth building which would explain why a large part of the building was destroyed for no apparent reason in the official story. Any evidence of homing laser equipment was destroyed.

  • What if it was a targeting laser from a drone that had orders to shoot down the plane or disable it but it either intercepted it too late since the plane was now above a populated city or its orders were to simply follow it and it's targetting laser was on but no had no permission to shoot down or was unarmed; and after impact, the pilot of the drone back at base alters its course to survey the damage of the building. The same drone that shows up in the video at the end?

  • Not sure if this is a laser but I know they used something. Military Satellite tracking, Radio controlled air craft seems reasonable.There is no way they flew those planes manually into those buildings. They would have been completely lost. It would have been more believable if at least one of the planes missed and clipped a wing and crashed into other buildings. The official story is too far fetched.

    Some people say the building were huge and hard to miss. Hard to miss seeing them but not...

  • You people obviously do not know what your military is capable of. In 1972, the us military shot a tank round out the air with a chemical laser. In the 80's, they developed the plasma rail gun. You like plasma screen tv's right? The white dot is clearly a laser designator. You know nothing of military weapons development, therefore most people can't wrap their minds around some of the things the military is doing.

  • the white dot is the sunlight's reflection of the plane.

  • the white dot is the plane's reflection. #failed theory.

  • Yeah....but how did they put an IR laser pointer on that pigeon's head? dumbass

  • Just once, I wish I could see some kind of CREDIBLE evidence of a 9/11 conspiracy. Instead, all I see are videos, views and opinions from seemingly no-talent, inbred, booger-eating morons.

  • i work and launch military uavs and that is not a uav at all. they are desinged to move as slow as possible to capture live video. fake.

  • I don't think crashing a plane into one of the worlds largest building requires a laser. It's pretty hard to miss.

  • @MacksP0w3r As if you spent ANY time in a flight simulator. Hitting the WTC at over 400 knots at sea level is like trying to enter your garage moving at 150 mph. Nearly impossible. Pilots for 911 truth. Don't believe me, listen tot he experts.

  • @video

    So u mean there was no1 to die in the Plane, What a Mess, Go n check the records of those who died in plane, n its simple to conclude. Do they don't even have a record of the dead one's. Lame.

  • Wow! I really see it now. It was really a drone plane mocked up to look exactly like a 767, right down to the passengers that conveniently disappeared (obviously, they were in in on it). And hitting a building that size is SOOOOOoooo hard that I *almost* missed it once in a flight simulator (actually navigating to the right area is a FAR harder trick). There HAD to be a targeting device!! I mean...it is only 200' across and 1300' high.....idiot.

  • This video doesn't prove anything other than the fact that a bunch of religious nut balls flew planes into the twin towers. First off, you wouldn't have seen the targeting laser. Secondly, what is being claimed as a UAV is a bird or some other sort of debris. Even today, we do not have any UAV's that can move at that sort of speed.

  • It's a piece of debris from the other tower you moron

  • This video is definitive proof that high tech weapons were used to guide the emergency backup plane into the 2nd tower. (the 2nd tower's plane defected somehow) They didn't have a second emergency backup (remote controlled and aimed) plane to use when building 7's plane defected also. this is what they whispered to prez in the classroom on 9/11 am/ (our plane for building 7 has also defected, we are busted mr president) And more dots connect until the picture is exponentially undeniable.

  • The negative feedback is from Israel,

    and the zionist pigs good job .

    Fuck Israel......

  • probably just the headlight reflecting off the shiny glass of the building. u cant see IR

  • @deejaygixxer

    filmed on a camera phone

    1: grab a tv remote

    2: turn on camera on your phone

    3: direct the IR bulb at camera

    4: press buttons and look on screen

    IR target marker seen by a camera phone :)

  • some one has been smoking some pot...what a fricking idiot!!!

  • USELESS........

    

  • @yeahiknow96

    Yeah, you can't see that. In most likelihood that was a piece of paper or fabric being blown

  • Get real. That's paper coming from the other building. You can see it IN THE SKY a second before it moves in front of the building. And that "uav" was moving way too fast ... it must've been one of those "rods" that the OTHER conspirocy nuts are always talking about. You "Troofers' are just trying too hard.

  • # EPIC #FAIL

  • There's so much fail to this theory, Obama endorsed it.

  • The big problem, other than the obvious, is the "laser dot" would not be visible between buildings. The "laser" although not visible to the naked eye would definitely not be visible between the buildings where the light is traveling down the street.

  • Anyone else think that so called "uav" was traveling much too fast to be a uav, I mean I'm no genius but that looked Damn close to super sonic so where's the sound of a jet engine? That whistle sure as hell wasn't it and if it was an ir tag it would stay on Target not love around to the next building

  • It's a fairly obvious and measurable reflection off the plane. Unfortunately, facts matter little when there's a desire for conspiracy.

  • Looks like a bird flying slightly toward the camera....

    Not only that but that would be one HUGE laser beam......

  • I would also like to have an airplane like this that sneaks into the building and vanishes. Steel that is softer than aluminum, this is surley an U.S. invention.

  • Wheres the laser? All I see is a piece of paper, and at 5:11 I see birds flapping wings.

  • "Laser" or not is absolute unimportent: The Maker of this Video present the evidence not very well.

    For a better explanation look this video:

    watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q

    (There is a LOT more evidence in the other video).

    P.S.: we need a WORLDWIDE REVOLUTIOn !! ...

  • @FreedomFighter2002 Thanks, very useful!

  • if the uav wasnt united states military y didnt they use IT to destroy the towers instead of stealing a boeing and risking the possibility of it missing? and the military scrambled jets not long after they realised some planes had been hijacked

  • Now that thrid object that obviously flies by looks to me like a "Raptor" UAV. FOlks you know that the Authorities had scrambled F-16s and F-18s and UAVs where most likely dispatched from the nearest military installation. The tape shows it at 05:11 on the clock

  • Sweets lord people!!! That is just the reflection off the glass at WTC of the incomming aircraft. It is obvious that the person(s) that uploaded this video either purposely came up with this lie or has no idea what he's talking about.

  • @MrJrv435 I agree!!!!!!!!

  • @MrJrv435 Jesus H. Christ in a chicken basket Jebidiah! You know nothing of military weapons development over the past 30 years. Plasma rail gun, chemical lasers are some of the things. What most military people know is what a laser designator looks like.  You obviously don't. I served in the air force, my brother in the army, my mother in the coast guard, my father in the air force. Look up what a laser designator is.

  • @MrJrv435 that would be a good one, but you can still see the laser/light after the plane has already crashed, on the lower building. Silly Dweebunkers

  • @MrJrv435 the light also continues over to other buildings next to it after the plane crashes

  • See for me there's just too many probabilities out there. Video A says it's not a 767, one says it's gotta bomb under it's belly, other says a missile. One says it's a military plane another says cargo plane. A flash before hitting the building, and a light. Now a little black dot flying across the screen. UAV? Don't know. I'm afraid we wont know the real truth on what happened that day until some yrs later, probably when those involved are dead and gone.......Just like Operation Northwood.

  • lmao like a plane would need to be guided to a target as big as the south tower.. dude you've been watching that move 'navy seals' too much. go uncover the mystery of how to get chicks to touch you.

  • The plane is coming into the sun and the wind shield of the cockpit is reflecting the sun onto the WTC. I got it after the first showing.

  • best video about 9 11

  • I'd say it is the reflection of the sun off the aircraft

  • 4:56 you hear a missile like whoooo boom and there was explosives or the tower was blown up if there wasnt neither then the building would collapse

  • US goverment destroyed the towers so they could have an excuse to invade muslim countries USA is the biggest terrorist

  • laser is coming from the E4B thats seen in the sky directly behind the building., its also at the correct angle for the beam., the E4B's were used to guide in the remotely controlled boeings....

  • Just recorded this vidio, whit my Highspeed camara (slowmotion) and the drone you can "SEE" at 5.11 is cut in. so better luck next time :D

  • so they needed to laser paint the tower. because they could have missed the target ?

  • i remember the first time i smoked pcp

  • reflect the sun to the airplane , the light towards the building.

  • YOU LEFTIES ARE NUTS,,,NUTS,,,NUTS,,,,,,BIN LARDEN SCUM HATE YOU TO LEFTIES

  • irate is right the "laser" is falling debris.

  • yeah i think same, and at the end u can see that is not a drone is a couple of birds... in one frame u can see them with wings up and in the next frame u can see them with wings down... maybe u think that light is a laser pointer but i think is a reflecting light from plane.... epic fail theory

  • Yea. I think there is a lot of fail to this theroy.

  • what the fuck are you honestly trying to prove you're piece of shit "theory" with this load of crap? Get a brain cell. As others have said before, if there was a laser, it would have been infra red as all laser targeting systems are, and as for that "suspicious background noise" for all we know it was squeaking brakes on a passing bus or taxi. All you are going on is speculation to accuse the so-called dumb hick president Bush of the single largest gov. cover-up in world history, ur a disgrace .

  • But not with an IR camera, guys. -_-

  • Actually it isn't a piece of paper, anyone capable of doing a closer examination can see this. about 1/4 of a second in you see your "piece of paper", but just before impact at maybe 3/4 of a second in, it's gone..not to mention from that distance, seeing a piece of paper floating around the top stories of the WTC? It would have to be the size of a chalk board..idiot. It's obvious after 10 years of compiled evidence that this was a false flag operation, anyone who still debates this is ignorant.

  • 1:36 damn the plane just passes so close by the Empire State building.

  • listen to that kid say Holy shit 10 times is sickening....blind leading the blind

  • Lol fail...

  • "it was paper" is what they want you to think.lol

  • @metalf919 IR Lasers are invisible to the naked eye dumbass... And they aren't white. That, and I doubt any kind of missile would respond to the movements of a Laser Designator that quickly.

  • in fairness if your country was being attacked would you send out drones to see wtf is goin on?

  • Why isn't that white dot in any of the original video? News flash: Laser designators are not in the visable light spectrum... At least not to the human eye...

  • lol..agreed falldown i coulda can make this in photoshop too...

  • It is a pice of paper dumb ass

  • What a dumb ass. Oh visible infra red and in broad daylight no less. Also the whistle of the drone? Ever hear a jet engine before? LOOK UP IN THE AIR! IT'S A BIRD, NO IT'S A PLANE NO, IT'S A WHACK JOB CONSPIRACY NUT BUY THE NAME OF FREEDOMLOVER911 WHO'S LONG OVERDUE FOR A BLOW JOB. Good luck weiner.

  • @talon55130 How ignorant!

  • now I don't actually believe that a few extremists did this, it was probably an inside job...but dude!

    falling paper closer to the camera

  • @numb3rtv Yes, there was a lot of paper fiting around but not sitting on the side of the building BEFORE the plane hit!!

  • @star4evr9

    everyone knows it was an inside job but come on...thats just paper!

    Paper from the other building that has a huge whole in it.

  • This could be edited/manipulated film, but the whole event and the official story is such a huge lie that it shines through to anyone with a bit of awareness. My question is: What difference does it make that someone use a target system - it's already obvious that the intent is to hit the buildings. If you got footage of a drone with "CIA" on it, from around that time, that would get all of us further.

  • This is so lame you nuts get crazier by the minute

  • @MeanMachine67 There are none so blind as those too blind to see (too scared to see) I sympathize. This truly is frightening to know really happened! :(

  • Death to America Goverment

    Death to Al Qaede And vahabi

    Death to Bush

    American goverment men is Donkey!

    But I do not know how are the people of American.

    Maybe Good or Maybe Bad

    I do not know

    i am from IRAN

    :)

    thanks

  • Hey Freedomlover911.....get a life and a clue...idiot

  • That is interesting... It's moving too fast and straight to be a bird or piece of paper. It looks vaguely like a UAV exiting a target area in a hurry...

    Too bad no one can discuss the truth about what really happened that day without being made to look like a crackpot conspiracy theorist, even though there's still many unanswered questions and the official record doesn't answer them.

    Life goes on, and America bought the official story--more because it needed to than for its basis in fact.

  • haha you people can also see the IR light to the TV from the remote? tards..

  • it s a pidgeon or something assss, how else can it be in front of a building 2 miles away?

  • Crackpots

  • Actually its a reflection of the approaching airplane. Look Again 10 Times

  • its dosnt matter what was that fact is This is happend one way or another and evrybody know who did it and way questions is with this silense how you gonna live with this guild ...! ????

  • Its the reflection of the sun off the plane's windscreen.

  • to bad IR is invisible to the naked eye...

  • @falldowncliff too bad its not to ccd camera chips. derp

  • @falldowncliff on top of that, if u could by any chance SEE it, why would it continue travelling to a building much closer to the camera? Piece of dust FTW :D

  • @DeKlauwXD ..Piece of dust?The size of a window!?!?HAHAHAHAH.

    C'MON SON. It may not be a lazer but it damn sure ain't dust.

  • @falldowncliff not the reflection

  • @falldowncliff  but not a camera .

    you and 10 other people did not know that.

  • @falldowncliff That wasnt the naked eye that recorded it, was it?

  • @cassius969 I record things naked all the time

  • @falldowncliff yea but its still recorded with a CAMERA not with a NAKED EYE

  • @falldowncliff It is invisible to naked eye, BUT with camera you can see IR light. I'm sorry but try it for yourself and you'll see. And btw, I don't believe in this theory.

  • @falldowncliff hence why it's recorded on a camera? Dipshit.

  • its a bird its a plane, nooooo its the zionist whom have made million if not billion in weapon, training private contractes and oil from this day.. may allah grant the innocent life lost peace and blessings in the hereafter ameen

  • airplanes head lights ... may be ..bt it doesnt prove nething !

  • for all you retards who think its a piece of paper, it must be a big ass piece of paper for it to be caught on camera from that far away and or it to not desinigrate when the explosion happens. If you watch closely then you can still see it during the explosion, paper cant do that.

  • at the end of the video look at the close up of the suspect drone.....it's a bird chasing another bird for some lovin, thats all....

  • Probably a bird...

  • i also think it is a piece of paper, but a cam can see I.R. you can try it yourself, most cellphones have cam's inside, so switch it on, get a tv.remote or something else with I.R. and hold the black part towards the cam lens and push a button. Then you will see a light-blue light flickering. I use this method to check I.R. remotes.

  • @nielsisa the IR spectrum is invisible to the naked eye, in other words, unless you have Night Vision Goggles(NVGS or NODS as the military would refer to them) with the capability to see IR light then its invisible. Hence, a normal camera without IR capability cannot capture IR light.

  • Lmao these must be brain dead

  • The UAV that you keep referring to is known as the Avenger. It was developed by the USAF and it is way bigger than any "bird" you're trying to compare it with. The Avenger is 44 feet long and has a 66 foot wingspan. You know any "birds" flying around NYC that big?

  • dats the reflection on the windows. and IR lasers are invisible to the naked eye. and if a drone was targeting the building why did it pass on the opposite side of where dat white dot was?

  • why shouldnt i believe this,

    even if it aint true, i believe this is true,

    you know why,

    thats

    WHY!!

  • If you say "muslims did 911" muslims bring up the whole "jews did it, muslims in caves could never have done this" but if you say "muslims could never have ever done 911 they'll instantly drop their theories and tell you how great it was for islam

    when debating with muslims its al;l abotu how you phrase things - they aren't smart enough to see the bait coming that way

  • @personage2007 The 6 August 1945 nuclear explosion hypocenter at Genbaku Dome was almost directly above (150 meters / 490 feet away) an A-36 standard steel structure but withstood the explosion and stands even today. Debating any religious anything is Master Baiting the Moronic Masses, you do not drive several airliners into the towers and have the Marxist Broadcasting Empire actually deliver any Broads, they're all skinny and starved to promote the concentration camp look for fema campstyle

  • its called glare from the windows? i think?

  • as a conspiracy theorist myself i have got to say this is retarded. the white dot could of been many things especially concidering if it was infrared you would be able to see it. second drones dont whistle

  • and that black thing was prolly a damn bird flying..and the noise? Its fuckin new york aint it? ever heard a subway ur dick? u have some fuckin nerve to try to convince us that this is real...GOD BLESS AMERICA

  • Do u rlly think that u want us to believe that our own fucking government killed over 3000 people and for what reason? U want us to believe that piece of paper was a fuckin "laser designator"?! R U FUCKING INSANE?! The person who filmed this mustve been miles away...and if u can still see that "laser" than it mustve been the size of a fuckin minivan. and the second video. A "drone" that fuckin flies on the one side of the tower "marks" were to hit on the opposite side? make sense?

  • piece of paper mate

  • fake and gay!

  • Believing in conspiracies is for people who can not grasp the idea of an attack planned out by a relatively small group as the Al Quida. They rather believe that only a big very powerful government can plan such an attack.

  • Some people just believe TOO MUCH in conspiracies.... not everything is a movie people.

  • Holy shit, you're a moron MAKING EXCUSES FOR THE JIHADIST SCUM, therefore YOU are their ally and should be thrown in gitmo.

  • well for one im glad this happened. they found an old wooden ship at ground zero that dates hunderds of years back

  • @William1990hill your fucking dumb. stfu

  • paper

  • No laser beam could ever be white. White light contains ALL wavelengths of light. Lasers emit a very narrow bandwidth of light with respect to the spectrum. Although it is true that some lasers can sweep multiple wavelengths, they can only emit that one narrow bandwidth at a time. Notice how the white dot moves at the same relative speed as the plane, the position of the sun (high and to the right side of the plane), and the dot is above the plane and closes to the impact point

  • @matthewbgibson556 Complete horse dung. A laser can be white. I've seen white lasers. Krypton lasers are white. They use them in laser light shows. Also you can have very light blue and red lasers that appear white.

    I think people should read up on stuff before they make comments.

    However this video is fake, they would use an infrared laser that you can't see without infrared vision. Why make it white? Al Qaeda prosecuted the 9/11 attack.

  • LOL This just cracks me up. Not only is it a piece of paper floating around but MORON tells us its intense infrared laser light shining off the building. Duh, the human eye nor the video camera that took this picture can SEE infrared.

  • The buildings never existed, its a big hoax.. (have fun with that, conspiracy nuts)

  • The terrorist pilot visited the WTC to accurately set his sophisticated gps. This is a known fact. Google "wtc hijacker gps".

  • If you notice the other building has been hit already, it is debris from the other building.Even after all this time I cant imagine what those poor people went through.

  • so the person who posted this video is saying that in the earlier parts of this video the plane and a drone missile simultaneously hit the building ? FYI i think a drone missile is very loud upon contact

  • its just some bloody shrapnel

  • If you people we're smart, we could say:

    A: Editied video (most likely made by a seed from another country)

    B:Planes Reflection (Probably what it is)

    C:Maybe it was a UAV laser painting? (IMPOSSIBLE! 767 aircraft are not modified to follow lasers... Osama Bin Laden ADMITTED to planting terrorists in those planes to crash them into the towers.)

    Who the fuck would be smart enough to modify a whole fucking plane as to follow an infrared laser dot. HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED ITS DEBRIS? Idiots.

  • Bush and Cheney flew both planes and jumped out just before they hit

  • das ist ne scheibe...its the glas of a window

  • huh, very strange

  • IF you think this sh*t is real! pack your shit up and get the hell out, the government is killing its own people. you are more than welcome to book a flight to somewhere you will feel safe.

  • You guys do realize the targeting lasers they use for guided weapons are invisible to humans right? They operate in the infrared wavelength, that means unless you had your camera turned to night vision (if it supports true night vision) you wouldn't be able to see the dot. What you're seeing here is more than likely just light reflected off the surface of the airliner.