Added: 4 years ago
From: 911NeverForget
Views: 37,828
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (336)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Never forget....there is no plane in the picture

  • @0:25 :P the terrorist have a magic shrink ray.... i guess that's why there so little. but ya i blame china for that attack

  • @mozart116 It's only a quick side view. It's obviously not a missle if hundreds of people watched as the plane flew right into the building, then saw the aftermath.

  • that looks like missile, way to damn small to be a plane. 0:23

  • You two are arguing who's smarter... How about an English lesson on usage? Both of you need to go back to elementary.

  • Plane? Yea right.

  • So your telling me that that "plane" is a boeing 757...looked more like a missle to me not nearly large enough to be a plane

  • ok but where is the engine and seats and everything else that WON'T BURN up in a fire???

  • at precisely 0:25 you will see an invisible plane hit the pentagon.

  • Is it possible that the car arriving on the scene at 2:49, contained the person that fired that missile?

  • it was a missile im sure it wasnt a plane its way to short to be a plane at that speed

  • @DeeJayNickztar Yea a missile flying a couple feet from the ground, get a fucking brain retard

  • @ProtectDavid aye i wasnt stating a fact... i reli cudnt care less i was jus sayin so ur the retard.

  • i dont understand how a plane can be controlled going over 500mph at that low down, cause the building wernt that tall.

  • @scoobersteve2010 It was low to the ground for maybe 4 seconds.

  • I know how the plane didn't appear on the frames. It was going five hundred miles per hour. Tell me that it would have appeared on a frame-by frame video. It wouldn't have showed up. Look at the car, for example. It just sort of blinks by.

  • @burmiester1 you know what? i could record a plane flying miles above the ground and i would see the plane or at leats where its at, and for some random reason cameras fail at this just for that day? come on!

  • Forget the video. I have one question for people who do not believe that a plane hit the pentagon - Since American Airlines flight 77 allegedly did NOT hit the Pentagon on 9/11 (according to conspiracy theorists), then what happened to the missing passengers that were on that flight? Or the plane, for that matter? If flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, where did it go? How do we explain a vanished flight and passengers?

  • @mplsmn1975 thats easy they are all aliens from area 51 and after this they fly back to their planet.

  • @dasheiligeheerlager Cute. Is that a new conspiracy theory? (just kidding)

  • anything could've happened in between those frames. wind could've blown it out of the camera. the slow frame rate can make things appear and disappear.

  • the plane had hit the building seconds before that mark. i see no pipe.

  • i can say that i have as many hours working with editors too. it doesnt make me automatically correct unless i prove it.

    you guys always like to say you have some kind of experience somewhere without proving it to make it sound like you know what you're talking about when you dont.

    face it. it has not been edited.

  • just how is it the "wrong angle"? no one said it was the wrong angle but you.

    the video's from a distance. do any of you guys think about distances? if the video is in the distance, the plane will appear shorter. you learn that in school.

    you dont even know how things can appear smaller in videos according to distances and you're asking ME if i know anything about film and video? hilarious.

    the frame rate can also mean the amount of frames per second. another thing you should know.

  • this has the same quality in all of the documentaries it has been shown in.

    that "white stripe" is the smoke trail from the plane. you're jumping to conclusions based on a video with a horrible frame rate and blurry quality.

  • Who are you 911neverforget? you seem so biased? defensive

  • having an opposing opinion makes me biased and defensive? not at the least.

  • Where did the molten metal come from in the WTC's wreckage? why were the employees in the west side of the pentagon asked to be moved to another office one week in advanced were the "plane" hit? Why is there so many strange events withing the 911 crysis? Your a liar 911NeverForget !

  • there's no concrete proof that there was any molten metal in Ground Zero but there's proof that molten aluminum trickled from the South Tower before it collapsed which easily could've come from F175.

    where did that little tale about them being moved come from? proof?

    you asking that question is a good sign that you're not thinking very well at all. of course there were strange events on the day the US had received the most deadly terrorist attack in history. it's nothing new or suspicious.

  • @911NeverForget Same goes for the governments version you hypocrite. Molten metal was found in the wreckage. Planes did not take down the towers and thats a fact! your so full of shit you have nothing, only the lies you've been told!

  • @911NeverForget well if you americans are with your government i see you as the world does. your the real terrorist!

  • and now im a terrorist for simply disagreeing with you.

    you're being an ass.

  • @911NeverForget look into it yourself. i forget the names but workers inside the pentagon were moved a week in adavanced, same as the bomb sniffing dogs that were in the WTC's. oh yeah and how the insurance works with the WTC's was just another flok (event) right? LOL way to many events that were pre plained! there's no way the governement could not have been part! simple as that

  • as always when you guys dont have proof to offer i get the "look for it yourself" like im supposed to do your job to prove your claims. YOU made the claim YOU provide the proof. that's not my duty, it's YOURS. if you dont give a link then it's safe to say you don't have one. period.

    bomb sniffing dogs were only there because the security was heightened and they returned the security to normal levels, thus removing the dogs.

  • it wasnt a "flok". it's not surprising that they got insurance against terrorism considering the North Tower was bombed in 1993.

  • Why do you not want the truth 911NeverForget? Because if you have read the government's version you would know it is all a lie! ok...so the fire from the planes made the 3 towers fall...how did fire make them fall the way they did? striaght down at free fall speeds?

  • a better question: why do you make baseless assumptions?

    it wasnt straight down at free fall speeds.

  • Don't believe anyone people! do your own research! Many good people are trying to get the truth out but the government and media are doing a great job keeping that from happening! dont believe in the lies, 3 towers 1 day, from fire? never before in history did fire destroy a steel framed tower! lies lies lies!

  • never happen before =/= cant happen.

  • @911NeverForget yeah it cant happen. fire can't melt that type of steel! you dumbass

  • no one said it melted.

    lose the insults.

  • @ 0:25 far left corner is the plane / missle Looks Very small.

  • why do people have the idea that this camera was right up against the plane? it wasnt. it was a good distance away, hence the small size.

    it was a plane.

  • @911NeverForget Ik it was a plane some people think it was a missile ,just pointing out time the plane is seeable.

  • I feel extremely sad and upset that the good american citizens actually believe in there government's version of 911. none of it makes since, and is complete fucking corrupted bullshit!

  • actually it does make sense.

  • @911NeverForget well there's plenty of good people even american police that have contradicted the usa governments version of 911. The plane that sapposedly hit the pentagon flew away seconds after the huge fire ball, is what the american 2 police officers said. and i believe them! why dont you?

  • @911NeverForget proof it? cause i can

  • i doubt you can. any proof you guys have usually contain severe flaws.

  • @911NeverForget There's enough proof that the government's version is a lie! There's proof that the government could have been part of it but the government was not aloud to be interrogated or interviewed. "They" hired a group to do there dirty work. This "group" hired by the government was not as smart as they initially thought because there a many flaws, un answered questions that can very well lead us to the truth! Why doesn't the American people want the Truth?

  • I just want to know what happened to the people that were supposed to be on that plane..if it is a missile, then were the passengers and crew of the missing plan murdered/\.

  • there were remains found.

  • @911NeverForget "claimed to be found" the debris of the plane "disintegrated" but somehow BODIES were found?? Come on, get serious already. I'm not one to search for conspiracy theories at all, but this doesn't even qualify as a conspiracy. The only conspiracy to me is that there is a plane someone in this crash.

  • i didnt say complete bodies, did i? you're taking my quote out of context. typical.

    remains can easily refer to body parts. they were burnt remains and were not pristine. they didnt end up completely fine.

    no problems here.

  • @911NeverForget remains were found? says who? the same people that said the WTC's fell because of fire right? your a fucking liar, this was not a plain, 2 american cops even stated that the plane flew away after the fire ball?? they were after told they could not speak about what the saw ever again? somethings fishy!! and stop defend the liars or you might go to hell with them for that.

  • no they didnt and even if they did it's nitpicking. there were many witnesses that saw a plane.

    im not defending any liars. you are.

  • @911NeverForget I'm tired of fending off whack jobs about the supposed 911 coverup and theories. Could you please show me where I can locate the other footage of the plane hitting the pentagon so that I can put this to rest for people. Thanks and keep up the good work

  • i dont exactly know where the Pentagon footage i uploaded can be downloaded at since i've lost the links when my old laptop died and i dont recall what they were.

    however, i did upload all the footage (it shouldn't be too hard to find) so it should help you out. :)

  • @grammobici there's theory's that the people were executed. did they even recover a black box from one of the plains? they had to of, but of course they wont allow anyone to see that because of the obvious.

  • they got both black boxes that F77 had.

  • Stop saying it's not a plane. The frame rate is too slow to figure out what it really is. People were saying it was a plane anyway.

  • @dumpsterovation that is NOT a plane.

  • yep it is.

  • at 0:30 what is the fire on the left of the screen?

  • @xkillaz18x My first thought is that when the plane went in and exploded, the fireball would have travelled down the corridors blowing out windows etc. It would make sense.

  • @Joshalidina why that window and not the others?

  • 0:25 is no plane. a missiles from usa's own military plane that people say they saw! And i believe them, and not the people hiding all the video tapes with there lies!

  • uh, no one says they saw a missile.

  • @911NeverForget well, it sure wasn't a plane! pictures do not lie.

  • people say they smelled sulfer, like from matches! since when was sulfer ever added into jet fuel?

  • where the fuck are the anti air craft missiles? oops they forgot to turn that on that morning righttttt! or what about the bombs that were planted in the WTC's? do you americans actually believe in what your government says about all this? please reply!

  • ! this was no plane people! witnesses said they seen a US military airforce plane in the air shortly after this, and it was reported there was no planes in the air at this time, FUCKING LIE. theres no signs of a plane crash anyways!

  • you would think at the pentagon they would have better security cameras. not ones that take a picture ever 2 seconds.. -____-

  • im pretty sure, by now, that security is bigger and the cameras are better. 2001 was a different time.

  • @911neverforget

    Have u ever seen a plane up close??? Even from that distances u should be able to see the plane and know it was a plane...that was no plane, more like a missile, I seen pictures of the crash, there is no evidence found before the plane crash showing any debre from the plan and how would the plane crash so low to the ground and leave no marks on the ground below? No luggage was found bo seats no tail of the plane wings nor the front of he plane

  • @BICsuicideATLANTA you got that right! 911neverforget is probley some cia faggot trying to cover this up. my father been a clean up guy when a plane crashed where we live, there's always debre, luggage and body parts. or atleast the fucking motors of the plane lol boeing 737 motors do not vaporize i can tell you that!

  • Its not a plane.To fast to small. has to be missile

  • planes are able to travel that fast.

    it's only small because of the camera's distance from it. that should be obvious.

  • wheres the plane

  • right side of screen at 0:25.

  • @911NeverForget doesn't look like a plane

  • Pause the video at 25 seconds exactly. There is no way that white object that is about 6 feet off the ground can be a 747. Not to mention, do you know how hard it would be to fly a 747 jet a couple feet of the ground flying perfectly horizontal with the ground. These supposed highjackers were not good pilots, not even a veteran pilot could pull that manuver off, its a huge plane not a stunt plane.

  • again, there's a black object in front of it. the white stuff is the smoke trail. the black object is the plane. also, it was a 757 and not a 747.

    he wasn't perfectly horizontal. the plane was tilted where one of the wings was touching the ground.

    yes he could, actually, when are you're doing is steering a plane.

  • @911NeverForget no he couldn't, no chance what so ever it was a plane, do some research, a 757 is larger than the object in the video, left no wing marks, melted steel that requires temperature greater than the maximum potential of jet fuel and left a hole smaller than a 757, also, with all the cameras on and around the pentagon why such horrible indistinguishable footage. A minor taste of the truth.

  • yet more of the same thing, including stuff that had nothing to do with the discussion you're getting involved in at all.

    the "do research" line never works, the camera wasnt right up against the plane and thats easy to see, it didnt but its very hard to tell, that had nothing to do with the Pentagon and no one said it melted, the hole wasnt smaller as the wings barely dented the building, not all the cameras were pointed at that one spot.

    come back when you have something new to offer.

  • @911NeverForget Why would the FBI confiscate nearby hotel and gas station footage and withhold 84 tapes of the event, and only release these pitiful frames. Investigators found molten steel at the site so yeah there was. Direct quote "If you look at the hole in that was made in the Pentagon, the nose penetrated far enough so that there should have been wing marks on the walls of the Pentagon. I have been unable to find those wing marks."-Major General Albert Stubblebine (head of intelligence)

  • because not all the tapes were from the Pentagon and it wasnt just one video, they released two others.

    no they didnt.

    one person saying they couldnt find it means nothing when there were many many others.

    you still have nothing new.

  • @Dpelv1n if it was a plane, they would have released all the tapes to the public, there obviously hiding something. 911neverforget is a faggot and deserves to go to hell along with the true orchestrators.

  • this fucken slide show is taking forever...

  • its not a slideshow.

  • @911NeverForget You could've fooled me.. -______-

  • not really.

  • JEWS did it.

  • Jews did it

  • no.

  • how can anyone honestly say that they see a plane in this video? there are basically 4 frames of interest at around 25 seconds. the first shows a thin white line at the right of the image. the next shows the same thin line connected to the explosion. if you look carefully at the next 2 frames you'll see the line becomes more diffuse. i'm not aware of any thin planes that gradually diffuse in air...oh wait, that's because it's not a plane, it's a vapour trail.

  • there's a blackish object in front of the white trail. that would be the plane.

  • @911NeverForget How can you say that? there is no such object! i don't know what you're seeing but if there was a plane there it would appear a lot bigger and more visible than this invisible 'blackish object' that you're talking about. you might as well say that osama bin laden pops up in front of the camera because that would be just as truthful.

  • yeah, there is. this wasnt right in front of the plane. it was in the distance. the blurry quality doesnt help things either.

  • @qwerty86567

    There's also the eyewitnesses who watched the plane fly into the building.

    But obviously they're all in on it!

    Not really though.

  • @qwerty86567 hardly conclusive. those planes were made to reflect the sky above, and the ground below.

    this would make it all that much more difficult to see.

    But it is there, you (Really) have to know where to look. that's not vapor, BTW, it's smoke from a damaged engine.

    Fieve.

  • except it wasnt a missile.

  • It was not a missle .

    it was a plane.

    there proof

    inbox me and il tell you the whole proof and the awnsers people were trying to get for a decade now.

  • That couldn't have been a missile. It struck 5 lamp poles! And a missile don't take down 5 lamp poles unless they are standing in a row or if the missile is flying around all over the place to struck them on purpose...yeah...that sounds pretty smart...

  • Where is the plane at?

  • at the 25th second, you'll see a black object just barely ahead of a streak of white on the right side of the camera. if you look closely, you'll see the tail of the plane.

  • @911NeverForget THANK GOD I FINALLY FOUND ONE PERSON WHO SAW THE PLANE. ITS FUNNY HOW PEOPLE DIDNT SEE A PLANE BUT SWARE ITS A MISSILE. LOL

  • sorry my brother works at boeing he builds these planes- he has been there since the mid 1980s- hes a pilot and an aeronautics freak- theres no doubt in his mind that was a plane- at a few hundred miles an hour it would be a blur- a missile would not even register visually they move so fast- parts of the plane can be seen on many peoples amatuer videos - eyewitness accounts and those who died just didnt disappear - i guess the deads families are conspiring too huh??? 

  • Like lambs to the slaughterhouse. So unaware of your fate and who controls it.

  • @Vengeant1 Like retarded animals, so unaware of what life truly is they make up their own realities.

    Oh, and I'm talking about you, just in case you're too dense.

  • Funny how your government admitting to faking an act to start the Vietnam war that killed 58,000 Americans, but no one cares, and no one is in an uproar. Everything that happened on 911 has been declassified and planned decades ago and carried out now.  Wikileaks will eventually come across the documents that Cheney & friends used to plan this.

  • when did they do that?

    no it hasnt and no they wont.

  • @sychophantt SO THE GOVERNMENT FAKED VIET NAM BY SAYING WHAT? THAT COMMUNISM WAS TRYING TO TAKE OVER? THAT WAS THE TRUTH DUDE. AND WIKI LEAKS WILL PROBABLY SHED THE TRUTH ON 911 AS IT IS ALREADY, A TERRORIST ATTACK AND NOTHING MORE. AS MUCH AS I CANT STAND BUSH, I DONT THINK HE WOULD EVER DO ANYTHING TO FAKE WHAT HAPPENED. I MEAN NO ONE CAN KEEP A SECRET THAT LONG AND THERE WOULD BE A LOT OF PEOPLE TRYING TO KEEP THIER MOUTHS SHUT.

  • No wings, no engines, no tail, no wingmarks, no luggage, people, etc. You people who believe what your government tells you are doing real good! This is the most secure building in the world, and no footage of a plane, but inside an empty football stadium at 5 in the morning there is video of the roof collapsing due to snow.

  • all those existed, it has nothing with the goverment telling anyone, proof, and there is footage such as the footage i uploaded.

    because that's a sporting event. you guys will nitpick at everything.

  • Not sure how you sleep at night, 911neverforget, knowing your government slaughters it's own citizens and your helping them try to cover it up.

  • because neither is happening.

  • @Vengeant1 911neverforget must work for the government because no one with simple common sense can be this stupid. The evidence is right there in front of you we all can see it but not you! Very sad!

  • lose the paranoia and arrogance, thanks.

  • not fake but an inside job. and for those of you who say our government couldnt pull this off let alone do this to the american citizens> google US experiments on citizens see what crap they have done to us already. murdering us isnt such a leap

  • yawn.

  • Also, you see a tiny but of the plane, then the first quarter. You say it's because it's moving too fast for the camera to catch. If so, why does it just suddenly jump across the camera, with a big explosion? If it capturee those 2 small portions in 2 frames, it can show the 'plane' atleast half inside the building.

  • @911NeverForget So then how do you explain the wing marks on the WTC, compared to a HOLE 14 ft in diameter in the pentagon. Yes, it's poor video quality, but you can see everything else fine. It's WHITE. I don't see any color but white. And the reading skills 'insult' ? I read it fine, so not very effective.

  • again, apples and oranges. did you not understand that?

    no, you can't see everything else fine. they're blurry, dude.

  • More then one witness that was interviewed said they saw a smaller, white plane.

    Had no wings eh? I'm pretty sure a plane with no wings that hits 5 light poles will not make it's destination.

    So what hick, idiotic state are you from? Alabama? Arkansas? Texas?

  • and more than one witness said it was bigger than that. i already explained them anyway. apparently you ignored that too.

    i didnt say the plane didnt have wings. i said the wings had came off when it hit the Pentagon. you took what i said out of context. also typical.

    where did you get your lack of reading skills from?

  • @911NeverForget

    What you just said, was idiotic and didn't support anything

    Every other color scheme is fine, and the 'plane' is TINY. And completely white. Not an AAL757 at all. Contradiction- "The plane was huge" But it leaves a tiny hole?

  • yes, just dismiss everything i said as "not supporting anything". typical.

    what part of "the blurry quality did that" do you not understand?

    did "the wings came off" not click either?

  • Oh, and one 'witness' stating he saw an AAL 757, then several other questioned whom saw a smaller, WHITE (as in the 2 frames) plane.

    Time to stop being a hick sir,

    Now, lets see your facts and science supporting a terrorist attack on the pentagon.

    No Fox news told you.

    I'm waiting for your reply

  • witnesses see what they INTERPRETED something as, based on where and how they saw it. it doesnt guarentee that what they saw was true. what was true is that they really did interpret it like that. that doesnt mean there was a smaller plane. it wasnt one witness either. many saw a large jet hit the Pentagon.

    no, you need to stop cherry picking.

    what the fuck does Fox News have to do with anything? why is it always them getting the bad shit? why not CNN...NBC? i never even watch Fox News.

  • @edbelfor2 911neverforget is one person going thru life with blinders on!

  • wrong.

  • Executing a 330 degree vector at over 500 MPH WHILE descending, a commercial aircraft can't perform that.

    A 16 foot hole in diameter when a boeing 757s wingspan tip to tip is well, HUGE.

    So planes hit the WTC and left enormous holes, yet this 'plane' that hit the pentagon leaves one 16 feet apart? Thats bullshit.

    You're basically contradicting your beliefs.

  • yes it can, and it wasnt at 500 MPH until the pilot hijacker did a dive into the Pentagon.

    the wings came off

    the WTC and Pentagon are two different buildings. apples and oranges.

    nope, im not.

  • @911NeverForget

    "The wings came off"?

    So where are the Engines and those wings?

    I am sure you think JFK was shot by Oswald by himself.

    Open your eyes.

  • they found engine parts. the wings sheared off and disintergrated.

    open YOUR eyes.

  • @s3fredo The wings disintegrated LOL! You are one dumb ass!

  • worst comeback to a point ever. are insults the only thing you guys have anymore?

  • @sychophantt

    I didn't say that so you are the dumb ass!

    Still watching Wrestling punk?

  • Hole going through the WHOLE pentagon but fuselage located in the field?

    No skidmark on the ground?

    FIVE lightpoles knocked over and still being able to execute this tactic?

    FBI showing up to the gas station and hotel across the highway to confiscate video tapes?

  • proof?

    the plane didnt hit the ground.

    the plane's huge, dude. they were hit by the wings.

    to investigate the event. why do you people see every tiny thing as something suspicious when it's not?

  • @911NeverForget

    Um no go check out an AAL757....

    The WHOLE thing on this video is white, it's slim, you can't even see ANY red, blue or silver (which is more then 50% of the metal sheeting)

    Learn your planes shithead.

    Also, titanium alloy engines disappearing?

  • what part of "bad video quality" did you not understand? that is why it appears white, it's due to the blurry quality.

    how about you learn to read, idiot?

    they didnt disappear.

  • @911NeverForget

    Look at it, it doesn't even look big enough to be a plane, its tiny, PLUS, Its an AAL 757, American Airlines planes are shiny silver with red white and blue.

    Its white.

  • bad video quality explains that.

  • This isn't a "recording"? So when I used to push the "record" button on my old VHS machine, I wasn't "recording" video? Hey "911NeverForget, what does the "R" in "DVR" stand for?

  • okay, for one thing, it doesnt make a fucking difference whether it was a recording or not anyway. it makes no difference as to the purpose of the clip. i uploaded it as i did and whats IN the clip is what matters.

    secondly, its funny you'd rather poke fun at only one point and not the other three i made.

  • The recording is not a proof that it was a plane. Enuff said.

    And the explosion resembles too much of a payload than a fuel tank...

    If you are not blind or working with anyone, you are, no offense, plain stupid :)

    Don't worry, in about 50 years you will remember your postings :)

  • first off, this isnt a "recording"...its not an audio tape. its a video clip.

    secondly, the explosion is nothing different from the ones seen at the towers when the planes hit there.

    thirdly, im none of those. no one's working with anyone.

    finally, im taking that with a grain of salt.

  • Wht ever hit it enters the frame @ 0:25 ,If you move the slider from 0:23 to 0:25 you can see a white object enter the frame above the farthest orange cone at the horizon.

    The blast looks like it occurred just before hit hit the building .

    (Probable been said)

  • @tracker001

    yup spot on

    looks like this has been messed with ...

  • it hasnt.

  • Wht ever hit it enters the frame @ 0:25 ,If you move the slider from 0:23 to 0:25 you can see a white object enter the frame above the farthest orange cone at the horizon.

    (Probable been said)

  • The news said the muslim terrorists only learned how to turn, did the muslim terrorist pilot just get lucky when he nailed that perfect landing into the side of the pentagon? And how could that be the only video of an 'airplane' crashing into the pentagon, if it was a plane there would be a lot of vids not just this white blur that is indistinguishable.

  • The news said the muslim terrorists only learned how to turn, did the muslim terrorist pilot just get lucky? And how could that be the only video of an 'airplane' crashing into the pentagon, if it was a plane there would be a lot of vids not just this white blur that is indistinguishable.

  • he learned how to operate the plane completely but only needed to steer it to do what they needed to do.

    wheres the rule that says a plane must have a ton of video?

  • the plane only shows up in one frame, and then boom. :\ hmm?

  • the camera frame rate was only one per second. that, combined with a plane moving at 500 MPH, made it difficult for the camera to catch the plane.

  • so why then do you insist that this blur is a plane?

  • im just glad my dads alive,i was only 2 when this happened and my mom and granma were freaking out because he wouldnt answer the phone,but thankfully its only because the building didnt have service in the building at the time of the crash.

  • This is just horrible :/

  • i know this sounds bad but why dident they hit area 51 ? that would make more sense

  • it wasnt a symbol of America.

  • i kn ow this sounds bad but why dident they hit area 51 ? that would make more sense

  • im sick of people saying things like this are conspiracies. seriously? 1000's of people viewed what happened, there was no "tomahawk missle" and it wasnt a plot from the governments. it was terrorists and their sick pleasures hijacking planes and killing many people cause thats what they think they are "destined" to do, its as simple as that so everybody stop your little theories cause its not convincing anybody besides uneducated rebelious teenagers who think its cool to deny simple facts.

  • @chillaxenintheburbs

    how about the millions. not just a few but millions (approximately 65-70% i believe was the tally?) who believed that there was more to this than what the government says. if what they say happened really happened, why all the secrecy? even the release of a couple videos or answering of a few questions could put this all to rest. but they prefer to keep it under wraps. hmm, wonder why....

  • there hasnt been any secrecy for one thing, and another thing the polls are either outdated and were not exactly accurate with the questions they asked.

  • 0:25 : That would be a tomahawk missile.