dude, the ignorant ass mutha from "how the world works" doesnt know shit, he was trying convince people that the Japan Nuclear problem was not as severe as was reported, he was trying explain what a nuclear meltdown was and that Japan was not having a Nuclear meltdown
#4 It doesn't matter that you or others use facsim to mean things you don't like. It does have a defination. Facsim is almost idenical to modern european socialism, i.e. complete control over corporations, except that it doesn't stress nathionalism or militarism. But economically they're the same.
In summary your video is so full of misunderstandings and misrepersentations that I find it unlikly this is an honest mistake. I believe that you are decieving your audience.
@HumanRights4Everyone #4 I don't use fascism to mean 'things I don't like'. I use fascism to mean the nationalist, corporatist political movements that arose in Europe as a response to WW1, the collapse of the dynastic empires and the Great Depression.
I don't think you have pointed out any misrepresentations or misunderstandings.
Btw, I'm now over at dlandoncole, hence the delay in replying to you.
@Darusdei Yeah they do and I explained why they do. Its one thing to not agree it another to not understand. Either your comhension of english or of the ideas is lacking. It's nothing to be ashamed of. I happen to be a native english speaker but useing non-native english speaker as an insult is racist.
@Darusdei Its not as clear cut as socialism = fascism. But the modern manifestation of socialism seen in nations such as Iran or Sweeden is nearly identical the the economic policies of 1930's italy. You seem to be a very ignorant person who thinks fascism is "rightwing" and socialism is "leftwing". Hate to break it to you but life isn't that simple.
#3 HTWW was merely refuting the point that saying Obama is a socialist was crazy. In fact he mentions the democratic socialist party in europe in the video saying that Obama's policies match up. Remember Obama's poilicies include a lot more then healthcare, as does socilaism. HTWW was empathizing the economic policies in this video. So he is defining socialism, futhermore not once did he say Obama is evil.
@HumanRights4Everyone #3 which democratic socialist party? I'm assuming he doesn't mean the tiny, irrelevant Italian one, so his comparison is meaningless.
#1 HTWW said in his video that Glen Beck had a 9/12 project, he then stated that that project was unrelated to the march on washington that just happened to be on 9/12. How did you not understand that?
#2 HTWW was only useing a simple headline rate in response to TJ useing a simple headline rate to "prove" his point. HTWW was making the point that indeed taxes are complicated and one cannot simply use rates like that.
HTWW Has his head so far up his ass, he can't see straight. He doens't use facts, he's driving by his emotions and feelings. I suspect that guy to have some kind of under the table contract with Fox. I have serious doubts about his sincerity.
Listen to the podcast I mention in the sidebar from the 912 project website that starts '912 march on Washington update'. I'm prepared to accept I'm wrong on this - I'm in London, and so not as up to speed as I'd like to be on what's going on your side of the Pond - but it seems unlikely that the two draw no inspiration from each other.
As I said, I may have made a mistake on that. I'm only saying 'may' and I maintain that there is an intellectual connection.
It's possible that HTWW only watched that first bit of the video; I went through what I saw as errors in his video chronologically. If I do another one, I think I'll start with the more effective points.
To be honest, the biggest one is 'what is socialism?' It encompasses such huge variation that it becomes meaningless unless further defined.
so, basically what you're trying to say is he didn't watch your video till the end, so he can be pardoned for his utter stupidity and lack of substance.
i have a problem with people not even trying to show a little respect to other people who criticise them, although people like you do it even though you have to stand infront of the camera and expect meaningless trolling abuse.
HTWW has no intention of addressing your points - it has no benefit for him.
he has shown no respect to you or to any other people who have been making pretty good responses - j0hn wi11iams made over a dozen of video comments and most of what he gets is: "yeah, you're wrong".
and conservative trolls.
i liked your response because it was straight to the point. but HTWW can't be bothered - he has TJ cock to suck for awhile until he reaches some arbitrary subscriber mark.
umm actually johnwilliams' only argument was that john holdren was well qualified due to his education degree at stanford (and some other school that i forget) all Lee needed to say was "intelligence does not immunize someone from moral bankruptcy" you obviously are biased. therefore, your judgement is already comprimised.
yeah - so you're saying that there should be some other critical criterion when it comes to hiring? to you, education is not essential for qualification?
i'm biased, therefore my opinion is "comprimised"?
if that's your argument, you are biased against my opinion, therefore, your argument is "comprimised".
you see were i'm going with this?
your whole comment is hilarious.
especially with the speech impediment (umm) as a starter.
To an extent, Jda4160 is right: being educated to a high level doesn't mean that you're necessarily 'correct' on an issue - although it improves the likelihood.
However, all Jda seems to mean by 'biased' is 'having an opinion'. Having an opinion doesn't necessarily compromise your objectivity. Indeed, you could easily say that HTWW is biased on that basis. He has strongly-held opinions; that alone doesn't mean we should discount what he says.
i'm not saying that he's right - i'm saying that qualification mainly depends on education (and experience to a degree). of course that HTWW has biases, we all do. but i'm not criticising his biases - i'm criticising his lack of civility and common decency when it comes to stepping up to your "accusers", if you will.
i'm sorry if i seem a bit cranky, but people like HTWW are the worst kind since you can't argue with someone who is completely irrational about his views and egotistical, scared, and more than anything, completely incapable of reasonable discussion without resorting to name calling and abuse.
dude, the ignorant ass mutha from "how the world works" doesnt know shit, he was trying convince people that the Japan Nuclear problem was not as severe as was reported, he was trying explain what a nuclear meltdown was and that Japan was not having a Nuclear meltdown
gronlaf 9 months ago
D LANDON COLE!
BRING BACK THE CHOPS!
Ninjaculation 1 year ago
#4 It doesn't matter that you or others use facsim to mean things you don't like. It does have a defination. Facsim is almost idenical to modern european socialism, i.e. complete control over corporations, except that it doesn't stress nathionalism or militarism. But economically they're the same.
In summary your video is so full of misunderstandings and misrepersentations that I find it unlikly this is an honest mistake. I believe that you are decieving your audience.
HumanRights4Everyone 1 year ago
@HumanRights4Everyone #4 I don't use fascism to mean 'things I don't like'. I use fascism to mean the nationalist, corporatist political movements that arose in Europe as a response to WW1, the collapse of the dynastic empires and the Great Depression.
I don't think you have pointed out any misrepresentations or misunderstandings.
Btw, I'm now over at dlandoncole, hence the delay in replying to you.
dlcu38 1 year ago
@HumanRights4Everyone "Facsim is almost idenical to modern european socialism, i.e. complete control over corporations"
that sentence didn't make sense AT ALL...
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei Are you not a native english speaker?
HumanRights4Everyone 1 year ago
@HumanRights4Everyone No but at least i know what those concepts mean.
Socialism and Fascism don't got anything to do with each other.
Btw with your grammar and spelling, i wouldn't call yourself as a native english speaker...
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei Yeah they do and I explained why they do. Its one thing to not agree it another to not understand. Either your comhension of english or of the ideas is lacking. It's nothing to be ashamed of. I happen to be a native english speaker but useing non-native english speaker as an insult is racist.
Research the ideas or take an english class.
HumanRights4Everyone 1 year ago
@HumanRights4Everyone Oh the irony... the thing what is amusing, is that you might be in need of the english class OR get that dyslexia checked...
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei What's amusing is that you have yet to make a single counter-argument to my claims. ;)
HumanRights4Everyone 1 year ago
@HumanRights4Everyone "Fascism is identical to socialism" does that need a argument or would a facepalm suffice?
Darusdei 1 year ago
@Darusdei Its not as clear cut as socialism = fascism. But the modern manifestation of socialism seen in nations such as Iran or Sweeden is nearly identical the the economic policies of 1930's italy. You seem to be a very ignorant person who thinks fascism is "rightwing" and socialism is "leftwing". Hate to break it to you but life isn't that simple.
HumanRights4Everyone 1 year ago
#3 HTWW was merely refuting the point that saying Obama is a socialist was crazy. In fact he mentions the democratic socialist party in europe in the video saying that Obama's policies match up. Remember Obama's poilicies include a lot more then healthcare, as does socilaism. HTWW was empathizing the economic policies in this video. So he is defining socialism, futhermore not once did he say Obama is evil.
HumanRights4Everyone 1 year ago
@HumanRights4Everyone #3 which democratic socialist party? I'm assuming he doesn't mean the tiny, irrelevant Italian one, so his comparison is meaningless.
dlcu38 1 year ago
#1 HTWW said in his video that Glen Beck had a 9/12 project, he then stated that that project was unrelated to the march on washington that just happened to be on 9/12. How did you not understand that?
#2 HTWW was only useing a simple headline rate in response to TJ useing a simple headline rate to "prove" his point. HTWW was making the point that indeed taxes are complicated and one cannot simply use rates like that.
HumanRights4Everyone 1 year ago
@HumanRights4Everyone #1 I think there are emotional and intellectual links that have been cultivated by people on both sides.
#2 OK
dlcu38 1 year ago
FAIL. You clearly didn't listen to his video
shatwood 1 year ago
@shatwood Oh? Why do you say that?
dlcu38 1 year ago
Good points.
seanotube85 1 year ago
Good job man! You ripped HTWW! Obviously the guy doesn´t know how the world works outside his Lala land!
cerritoboy 2 years ago 2
HTWW Has his head so far up his ass, he can't see straight. He doens't use facts, he's driving by his emotions and feelings. I suspect that guy to have some kind of under the table contract with Fox. I have serious doubts about his sincerity.
cartonhead 2 years ago 8
Came here via your blog, but something you should know about HTWW, he's never been one to let facts get in the way of an argument.
dominictemple 2 years ago 5
Oh, there's plenty of evidence of confirmation bias at work with HTWW :)
dlcu38 2 years ago
5 stared it and fav'd it to my channel. Nice work on tearing up HTWW.
caveman73 2 years ago 2
Thankyou very much!
dlcu38 2 years ago
More than welcome. I am not a fan of the extremes... Far Right or Left. Capitalism or Communism, yadda yadda yadda.
The middle is where the majority is and no one speaks for us.... Mainly due to there being no money in it.
We all get screwed over because no one has spepped up and shut both sides down....
There I will now get off my soapbox.
caveman73 2 years ago
US National Debt clock usdebtclock(.)org
powermousey 2 years ago
Listen to the podcast I mention in the sidebar from the 912 project website that starts '912 march on Washington update'. I'm prepared to accept I'm wrong on this - I'm in London, and so not as up to speed as I'd like to be on what's going on your side of the Pond - but it seems unlikely that the two draw no inspiration from each other.
Would you care to respond to my other points?
dlcu38 2 years ago
Yes, and the 912project isn't the 912 march.
HowTheWorldWorks 2 years ago
nice. you may have heard of something called "constructive criticism".
i guess you have a knack for answering to your critics with "uh-uh, you're wrong". unless they're the big names on youtube.
franzpolak 2 years ago
As I said, I may have made a mistake on that. I'm only saying 'may' and I maintain that there is an intellectual connection.
It's possible that HTWW only watched that first bit of the video; I went through what I saw as errors in his video chronologically. If I do another one, I think I'll start with the more effective points.
To be honest, the biggest one is 'what is socialism?' It encompasses such huge variation that it becomes meaningless unless further defined.
dlcu38 2 years ago
so, basically what you're trying to say is he didn't watch your video till the end, so he can be pardoned for his utter stupidity and lack of substance.
i have a problem with people not even trying to show a little respect to other people who criticise them, although people like you do it even though you have to stand infront of the camera and expect meaningless trolling abuse.
HTWW has no intention of addressing your points - it has no benefit for him.
franzpolak 2 years ago
Franz,
It's not an excuse, but it may be an explanation. It doesn't reflect well on him, given that the video is only a touch over five minutes long.
Sorry to be dim - did you mean I was showing respect? I hope I was.
xD.
dlcu38 2 years ago
he has shown no respect to you or to any other people who have been making pretty good responses - j0hn wi11iams made over a dozen of video comments and most of what he gets is: "yeah, you're wrong".
and conservative trolls.
i liked your response because it was straight to the point. but HTWW can't be bothered - he has TJ cock to suck for awhile until he reaches some arbitrary subscriber mark.
franzpolak 2 years ago
umm actually johnwilliams' only argument was that john holdren was well qualified due to his education degree at stanford (and some other school that i forget) all Lee needed to say was "intelligence does not immunize someone from moral bankruptcy" you obviously are biased. therefore, your judgement is already comprimised.
Jda4160 2 years ago
yeah - so you're saying that there should be some other critical criterion when it comes to hiring? to you, education is not essential for qualification?
i'm biased, therefore my opinion is "comprimised"?
if that's your argument, you are biased against my opinion, therefore, your argument is "comprimised".
you see were i'm going with this?
your whole comment is hilarious.
especially with the speech impediment (umm) as a starter.
franzpolak 2 years ago
To an extent, Jda4160 is right: being educated to a high level doesn't mean that you're necessarily 'correct' on an issue - although it improves the likelihood.
However, all Jda seems to mean by 'biased' is 'having an opinion'. Having an opinion doesn't necessarily compromise your objectivity. Indeed, you could easily say that HTWW is biased on that basis. He has strongly-held opinions; that alone doesn't mean we should discount what he says.
dlcu38 2 years ago
Although HTWW could do well to remember a line I like from Abraham Lincoln - you catch more flies with a drop of honey than a gallon of gall.
dlcu38 2 years ago
i'm not saying that he's right - i'm saying that qualification mainly depends on education (and experience to a degree). of course that HTWW has biases, we all do. but i'm not criticising his biases - i'm criticising his lack of civility and common decency when it comes to stepping up to your "accusers", if you will.
franzpolak 2 years ago
I think we're in agreement.
dlcu38 2 years ago
i'm sorry if i seem a bit cranky, but people like HTWW are the worst kind since you can't argue with someone who is completely irrational about his views and egotistical, scared, and more than anything, completely incapable of reasonable discussion without resorting to name calling and abuse.
franzpolak 2 years ago
Perhaps. Would you care to reply to my other points?
dlcu38 2 years ago